Reply With Quote
Literally 55,000 pages. She's stalling this as long as she can as they wade through boxes upon boxes of her emails.
Like whom?
OK Chump.
She is just pure as the ing wind driven snow and wouldn't try to hide anything.
And you spewing talking points that "most were already in the governments possession IFFFF they were sent to government addresses is just monumentally dumb considering the Secretary of State does a load of business with parties that don't use US.Gov.
ISIS?
Osama?
She turned over 55,000 pages so you already failed at one talking point.
Pretty big cop out just to avoid this question:From this point on I'm OK with being a silent observer of this thread. Feel free to declare victory and continue to spew Hillary talking points.
What are you saying she is hiding?
Literally 55,000 pages. She's stalling this as long as she can as they wade through boxes upon boxes of her emails.
What difference does it make?!?!
No, she actually turned over emails last fall.
You guys are really badly informed.
So you're saying she's not hiding anything?
I'm really confused at what you guys are angry about here. Your anger is apparently keeping you from reading anything factual about this.
i haven't followed this closely and just overheard the news at lunch say they were paper copies she turned over. No?
that line went over your head?So you're saying she's not hiding anything?
I'm really confused at what you guys are angry about here. Your anger is apparently keeping you from reading anything factual about this.
No. There would really be no reason to do so. If you want to go the black helicopter route, you can say she just deleted whatever incriminating emails you are dreaming of last fall before turning in the rest.
that line went over your head?
So, Chump...
( I know I said I wasn't coming back to this one but your hack partisan defense is so laughable I couldn't resist)
Are you saying using private email accounts shows good judgement for a Secretary of State?
No. There would really be no reason to do so. If you want to go the black helicopter route, you can say she just deleted whatever incriminating emails you are dreaming of last fall before turning in the rest.
so she did not turn over actual paper files of her emails? I am positive that is what I heard.
I really don't care one way or another, anything negative to come upon this vile **** gets me hard.
Kerry is the first to use government servers exclusively.
Powell used private email exclusively and deleted everything from his server when he left office. I don't think that's a big deal either. Rice and Albright claim they didn't use email regularly.
Email and the resulting record keeping is pretty new. I'm sure the new policy will be adopted from here on out.
Since she had control over what was turned over and the request came from the Obama State Department, I don't see how it would possibly play out in such an adversarial manner.
so she did not turn over actual paper files of her emails? I am positive that is what I heard.
So it appears.I really don't care one way or another, anything negative to come upon this vile **** gets me hard.
And DumpyChump artfully dodges a direct question and talking point deflects to pointing the finger at others.
BTW, Hillary Clinton who you have decided to "champion" *horn chorus sounding for DumpyChump* has already admitted it was a pretty bad idea to use a private email server.
But hey, DumpyChump keep talkin those talkin points.
I think it was fine. I don't see how you could miss that.
The problem I had was going cheap on the security certificate; but I would probably fault whoever set it up.
And that statement itself invites ridicule considering this redneck cowboy checks three email accounts from one "device". Is she trying to say she had to carry an Ipad for every email account?Hillary Clinton , seeking to tamp a simmerng controversy before the expected launch of her presidential campaign, said she used a personal email account instead of a government address during her four years as secretary of state because it was more convenient.
In retrospect, she said, she should have used separate accounts. “I thought using one device would be simpler, and, obviously, it hasn’t worked out that way,” Mrs. Clinton told a news conference Tuesday at the United Nations in New York. “Looking back, it would have been probably…smarter to have used two devices.”
So is an email account a device?
Guess that depends on what your definition of is, is.
Funny how history repeats itself.
Man, board Republicans are really reaching these days.
May as well concede now if this is the best you can do.
Keep trying, CC.
Something may stick someday.
and DumpyChump farts and slinks out of the room.
I'm commenting on the game too.
and DumpyChump farts and slinks out of the room.
It is SpursTalk after all.
Do you have anything more than gossip and innuendo at this point?
Do you believe she turned everything over? minus personal emails
And I'm still reading conflicting reports. Did she actually hand over 55,000 paper files?
I don't see why not in this case. I keep asking you what you think she's hiding.
Post your sources for the 55,000 sheets of paper.
Here's mine saying it's digital:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...ment/24668715/
It says 55,000 pages. Where are you getting its digital?
Why would they print them out? Why does it matter?
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/06..._r=0&referrer=
Finally, in December, dozens of boxes filled with 50,000 pages of printed emails from Mrs. Clinton’s personal account were delivered to the State Department. Those do ents were then examined by department lawyers, who found roughly 900 pages pertaining to the Benghazi attacks.
I don't know. It seems very odd.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions