why would rachal maddow insult you?
Insulting your intelligence isn't hard to do.
why would rachal maddow insult you?
LOL
Check the forum rules you ignorant . They aren't Chumps rules.
I am not obligated to educate you.
If Kori or LJ say I have to provide links to back up statements I make in the political forum for the stupid people that don't know how the google machine works then I will do it.
Until then, if it's something that really interests you (other than just being an irritating confrontational ) then google is your friend.
Last edited by CosmicCowboy; 04-06-2012 at 05:51 PM.
So sexual preference is the basis for your contra position? Thats nice. Oh and shes snarky. Uppity women should be burned at the stake huh?
burn your straw man at the stake instead.
Oh so when you say
You were just saying that as an observation and it has no position on how you view her opinions...
Show some ing balls and stand by what you say.
No, you aren't obligated to back up your claims.
You never do.
Sorry you're so sensitive. If you don't like being called out and are too much of a coward to be a man about it when you are, you should stop talking out of your ass.
Rachel Maddow is the average liberal. She makes a living off of tv advertisements when she openly admits to never watching tv.
She speaks to people as if she is teaching them. She has low ratings and only has a job because of cronyism
He's all hat and no cattle.
OK...
politically and intellectually I find her disgusting.
She distorts her version of the truth just as bad as Glen Beck does his.
She is a proud Lesbian.
Do you have a problem with me acknowledging she is a lesbian when she doesn't?
And yeah, it's OK to combine the two trains of thought and call her a lesbian just as you are allowed to call me a heterosexual asshole if you emphatically disagree with me.
Do you not understand how this is played?
...so much that you can't think of one example.
pfft...go yourself Chump. I'm not doing your work for you .
It's your claim.
Since you can't support it with even one example, I can safely conclude you just made it up like you always do. Someone told you to hate her so you just repeated it and you got a chance to flaunt your phobia again.
Good job!
Or another possibility is that I hold you in such contempt that I refuse to play your game.
GFY...
He doesn't present opinions CC... just trolls people that have them.
You know how it goes...
Show your facts...
No
Show your facts...
No
You are a pussy show your facts...
No
Here what about this...
Hah that doesn't count
Or this?
You misspelled a word
Or this?
Bigot
Or this?
phobic asshole
Or this?
Jesus dude get a life this topic is so yesterday.
Wash rinse repeat... never a clever thought, never a variation from the model.
Don't worry, I have probably committed some spelling error, said something racist, or have been a "pussy" in a 3rd grade attempt to get a response.
Funny thing is... he is going to think I'm talking TO him instead of about him and that he deserves a response.
Children should be seen not heard.
I would suggest that you stop letting the little ankle biter tug on your pant leg for attention and go shoot something while you still have light.
Oh, the Wild Cobra response.
Get something original, coward.
Except no one would think to call you a heterosexual asshole unless they thought the two things were related.
Or they were a re .
Or dishonest.
What place does sexual orientation have in this discussion other than for you using it as a point to try an discredit her? I understand that is not the only basis that you claim but it certainly seems to be an important point since you have fixated on it over your last 6 or so posts in this thread.
You being heterosexual is neither here nor there either. Thats my point. i haven't used your sexual orientation as a point to discredit you. See the difference?
at Chump defending Rachel Maddow like she is the modern day Walter Cronkite.
What a monumental fail.
Not much of anyone in this thread has defended Rachel Maddow.
Sorry, but you still have no chance of scoring with Cucking Funt.
huh? you think i am saying this to hit on CF? you having flashbacks to middle school or something?
Address the point: do you really think that someones sexual orientation is a basis to discredit someone's argument?
Strongly agree
His schtick is old and overused.
And heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeere comes the straw man!
You are so predictable, CC.
Talk about a tired schtick. It's hilarious that folks are so afraid of me that they are preemptively resorting to whining and name calling. I'm just a guy at a keyboard and I've cowed you all into submission by merely asking you to support your opinion with one (1) fact.
All you want is to be hugged and coddled by the members of your support groups who have also been called out by mean ol' me and knew they had been exposed as badly as you.
Tough .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)