And he is going to stick with the fraud argument ladies and gentleman.
lol fraud
Are you this hung up on me calling him Fraud King or is this a way to deflect from FuzzyLumpkins 3rd blunder?
If its the former have fun continuing on by yourself. I'm having a fun time watching Fuzzy flounder about.
And he is going to stick with the fraud argument ladies and gentleman.
lol fraud
Well, you're talking like he committed actual fraud and/or copyright violations.
Over and over, in fact.
If all I'm doing is making you walk back from your breathless claims, that's worth an lol.
lol
I am not going to allow lol fraud to bump a very good argument off the last page for new readers.
Nice job ignoring me.
Three simple questions I've got for you. Just answer yes or no, don't be a coward.
Did you say Michael Brown was shot in the back and then killed execution style on his knees with his hands up surrendering? Yes or no.
Did you cite an autopsy report by an unlicensed and unqualified man who has been publicly belittled by the medical community for doing so? Yes or no.
Did you cite a twitter user who stole another websites pictures/maps/diagrams and tried to pass it off as his own work? Yes or no.
Rumpy this is your cue to go into hiding.
a dozen people, try one website you hack.
Shaun King @ShaunKing
Follow
I'm done. I want to thank a dozen people who asked not to be named but worked their butts off to sleuth those facts. Arrest Darren Wilson.
9:37 AM - 18 Sep 2014
I am not going to allow lol blunder to try and pass off Shaun King's lazy and deceiving link as a good argument. He literally takes all the information/research/timeline/pictures from linked thread below and tries to present it as his own. It's truly pathetic, even more pathetic someone here is trying to present it as a good well thought out argument. Lol FuzzyBlunders
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/...f-eye-witness/
I'll keep dancing on you as long as you keep avoiding admitting to your collasal ups.
too big of an ego to admit when you're wrong anonymously.
What up Th'Slurper! Knew you'd stop in for some shielding.
Lol. You're such moron. You're too stupid to see what an idiot you look like to the readers of this thread. Yet you go on, banging away at your keyboard like a chimp, completely oblivious to how absolutely stupid you look to everyone.
And just to pile on fraud
Shield activated!!!
Tell your sperm soaker to stop spreading misinformation and I'll back off. Until them I'll continue to expose his takes he tries to pass off as truth.
I will allow this to be presented again for the new readers.
Well, specious fraud and copyright claims aside, what are you saying is factually wrong with King's tweets?
Exactly. Answer this question TSA. You're not suggesting kings message is ripped form the right wing sight you obviously frequent, are you?
I've never once said anything is factually wrong with them. Never even went there because he is just some random white guilt twitter .
Do you take a twitter user who can't do his own research as solid source?
What is factually wrong with the conservative treehouse evidence presented?
So why the fraud/copyright meltdown?
Just an attempt to discredit evidence you can't find factually wrong?
This is a weird tangent for you.
Apparently answering questions isn't required in this thread. I've asked your sperm bank multiple times and have not got one answer. Why would I give an answer to his shield?
Why skip over my other two questions. Answer those and we'll continue.
If it's factually correct, why not? He and the conservative blog thanked others for doing research they posted. The only reason you want to condemn one is because you don't agree with the author's viewpoint.
I have not found anything factually wrong with anything, nor have I tried to discredit anyone but you here. Seeing as I made you walk back time after time, you needed it.What is factually wrong with the conservative treehouse evidence presented?
Now you can answer these questions:
I told you how to get him to answer you. And just for the fun of it, can you show the images side by side that you feel King copped from the right ring rag you frequent?
now you are putting words in my mouth. Find me one post attacking his viewpoint.
The two links can not co-exist factually. I've you'd read both that would be fairly obvious.I have not found anything factually wrong with anything, nor have I tried to discredit anyone but you here. Seeing as I made you walk back time after time, you needed it.
You lazy . Open up two windows in your browser and do it on your own.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)