Planted by whom? Looks to me like she planted herself at Georgetown law.
If she did so for reasons pure political advocacy, as speculated by Mytheos Holt based on Jammie Wearin Fool's reporting, what's wrong with that?
might not be able to get a better policy.......with her being a and what not!
Planted by whom? Looks to me like she planted herself at Georgetown law.
If she did so for reasons pure political advocacy, as speculated by Mytheos Holt based on Jammie Wearin Fool's reporting, what's wrong with that?
And will someone please explain to me how the this es contraception was $1000 a year?
you can get an IUD implanted for $500 that lasts 5 years, rubbers are $1 apiece, the pill is as low as $4 a month...why do you guys just swallow that without question?
Sure, but it's a free country. Sandra Fluke can protest that if she wants, even demand that gender reassignment be covered. That doesn't make her a or a pros ute in any way.
using Maher as an example
1. It's pretty common knowlege that he's a condescending
2. He's on HBO, not government funded radio
3. This isn't about left and right anyway, as much as you would love it to be. Really not surprised that a re is defending Rush Limbaugh here.
I'll admit rush got a little carried away...
But who is the "they" that is supposed to cover all these things for free?
What difference does it make to you?
Be specific.
Dunno, tbh.
If, arguendo, birth control ought to be covered by Georgetown as a matter of equity, the cost is immaterial.
Easy. If she is a professional insurance rights advocate planted in that congressional committee hearing under the guise of being an "innocent law student" I have ZERO sympathy for her taking a little heat.
who's taking the heat?
Georgetown University?
Why would the issue be framed as a matter of equity?
So calling her a was justified to you because she is good at making a political case.
Please explain further.
it is already framed as a matter of gender equity, profe.
And why should Georgetown University be forced to furnish female students contraception for free?
I didn't say that. I am discussing her less than innocent (as presented) role. I already stated Rush went overboard.
Please try to keep up.
My understanding is insurance is not free, but maybe you know more about this particular policy.
So it really makes no difference to you.
Make up your mind.
I'm not making the argument it should. That's Sandra Fluke's hobby horse.
Board Republicans can't separate the issues.
As an educated consumer of insurance for my company I know that the cost of insurance rises or falls depending on the level of insurance coverage, specific items you do or don't cover, deductibles, maximum out of pocket, etc. that you choose.
What part of this are you not understanding?
though as pointed out, having medication covered by an insurance plan one pays for is hardly free
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)