you guys like chump who support the govt story hands down no questions asked are disgusting sycophants
" if there isn't any proof on the official govts website or in the govt controlled media then it just can't be true "
So if you don't find a discussion interesting, you try to end discussion? Interesting.
you guys like chump who support the govt story hands down no questions asked are disgusting sycophants
" if there isn't any proof on the official govts website or in the govt controlled media then it just can't be true "
What are you whining about now?
No it means that I will talk about something else. Me talking about WMD does not stop you from talking about the same birther stuff that's been rehashed ever since Obama announced his candidacy.
My thoughts should not dictate what you can or cannot talk about. Or at least I am not trying to make that so.
Nope.A bunch of expired duds were found.
That is a lie,
Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says (U.S. Department of Defense, June 29, 2006)
Poptech.
What we found is technically WMD, but it isn't we we were looking for. Since I like things in context, here is the interview:
This link jumps to the question and his answer in that interview on the WMD:
WMD qustion
It's just fitting that you'd fight so hard for the notion that Obama was born in Hawaii whenever then man reeks of shadiness and also his actions
It's fitting that you would whine about nothing and have nothing to back it up.
The official said it was a bunch of expired duds.
Thanks for repeating it for me.
Quote and cite where it said they were duds and no longer dangerous.
No it is not "technically" it is 100% irrefutable that WMDs were found. I am fully aware of what Bush wanted to find in shiny new cases stamped "IRAQ WMDS manufactured 2002". Instead over 500 still-lethal WMD munitions were found from older stockpiles. These are not children's toys. The idiots on these boards joke about them as if they are harmless, why don't they volunteer to test their lethality? How about having their children play with the "duds"?
Its already been quoted. Read the quoted portions of the article and see if you can figure it out. Look for words or phrases that fit the definition of dud.
No it has not been quoted re . Try learning how to read in full context and not cherry pick.
Quit lying about what I said, druggie.
You just lied, the evidence is irrefutable.
This is true. Saddam still had some WMD that we found. It's not what was being sought after. Like I said, technically he still had it. It is still very possible the good stuff was hidden well, or moved to Syria.
We all need to accept the fact that they didn't find the more serious stuff.
Don't bother trying to budge the morons from their angle. It's just a waste of time. Some of us tried over and over in the past.
Expired does not mean safe. It's still usable WMD. Just not as originally packaged.
He never said any such think. Stop twisting the truth.
When I call you a loon or crazy or the like, its because of your admission that you have a axis 1 mental disorder. You can try and call me re ed but I do not meet that definition. If anything is re ed it would be you if you are indeed correct in your self diagnosis. If you indeed have aspergers that means your brain did not develop to be able to discern things like nuance, emotional cues and the like. It is a autism spectrum disorder.
As I said before a self admitted axis 1 disorder sufferer really shouldn't throw out insults such as re ed because that means that your brain did not develop normally and you lack the cognitive abilities that typical humans enjoy ie you are re ed. You like talking about definitions. Well that is the irrefutable definition according to the DSM.
I don't understand how Wild Cobra and Poptech is refusing a statement that came straight from the horse's mouth.
The Earl of Sandwich probably thinks so.
Technicalities. Remember also, he answered to a question in the context of a passage out of his book. He probably didn't correct her.
They had nonfluctuating, but deadly WMD. The components could still be used. it was technically still WMD. There is no denying this.
They didn't find the "type" they were looking for. Everyone knows that.
We all know president Bush "misspeaks" on occasion. This is a silly thing to disagree with.
I quoted the book, idiot.
In full context?
No you didn't...
Liar...
You quoted a journalists who cherry picked out of the book.
I'll bet the context of the book mentions WMD that they did find, but wasn't what the were looking for.
Remember, they were focusing on active WMD.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)