View Full Version : Cavs v Lakers
Dim Tuncan
01-20-2009, 01:00 AM
ariza > lebron
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 01:01 AM
Ariza can't shoot.
Shang Tsung
01-20-2009, 01:01 AM
im getting that ariza boner too :D
Dim Tuncan
01-20-2009, 01:01 AM
hickson > kobe
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 01:02 AM
It's depressing when they score like 10 points in 1:30 late in the 4th. They're all a product of Kobe.
ManuTP9
01-20-2009, 01:02 AM
im getting that ariza boner too :D
:lmao
DPG21920
01-20-2009, 01:03 AM
The Lakers did exactly what they were supposed to. Feed the bigs early and often.
Thunder Dan
01-20-2009, 01:03 AM
I'm the president of the sasha pavlovic is a cunt fanclub
I hope lobes finger is broken and they have to cut his hand off and shove it up pau gasols ass
DPG21920
01-20-2009, 01:04 AM
Lolz
Thunder Dan
01-20-2009, 01:04 AM
IMs gonna go out and rape some women tonight
IronMexican
01-20-2009, 01:04 AM
It's depressing when they score like 10 points in 1:30 late in the 4th. They're all a product of Kobe.
Uh huh. Like I said, this game wasn't that big a deal to begin with. I am looking forward to Sunday though.
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 01:05 AM
I'm the president of the sasha pavlovic is a cunt fanclub
I hope lobes finger is broken and they have to cut his hand off and shove it up pau gasols ass
Can Ferry ship his ass out with Wally for something good.
lil_penny
01-20-2009, 01:05 AM
I hope lobes finger is broken and they have to cut his hand off and shove it up pau gasols ass
I don't think that would be as hard as a raping the lakers gave the cavs tonight though
IronMexican
01-20-2009, 01:05 AM
IMs gonna go out and rape some women tonight
Nah, I am probably staying home and fapping.
DPG21920
01-20-2009, 01:06 AM
If Wally and Sasha have trade value, then so does Bonner, Vaughn, Udoka, Oberto...
ManuTP9
01-20-2009, 01:06 AM
good win
Kobe™
01-20-2009, 01:07 AM
Yezzir!
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:07 AM
the cavs fell for the Kobe high trap bait! buhahah. ok doesnt work all the time, but it worked tonight lol
IronMexican
01-20-2009, 01:07 AM
Nah, I am probably staying home and fapping.
To my Ariza pictures, of course.
Spur-Addict
01-20-2009, 01:07 AM
There's nothing bad about this Cleveland loss to be honest. Missing two major players against a top team isn't going to get it done especially on the road. Lebron was simply doubled and abused all game because others couldn't create or finish. Lebron still owns Kobe. LBJ 7, Kobe 4. This game wasn't that exciting though, although Kobe hit some tough shots that were impressive. Nice snatch by LBJ on the Kobe drive, and that dunk on Lame-ar.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:08 AM
Wtf??? I step away when the lakers look to be in control to make a quesadilla and take a dump, I come back and now its only a 7 point game.
then i took a dump and they are back up by 17 lol
peskypesky
01-20-2009, 01:09 AM
There's nothing bad about this Cleveland loss to be honest. Missing two major players against a top team isn't going to get it done especially on the road. Lebron was simply doubled and abused all game because others couldn't create or finish.
:toast
Thunder Dan
01-20-2009, 01:09 AM
I'm going to bed, fuck those asshole who invented the pacific time zone, I hope them, pavlovic, kellen winslow, pau gasol, rondo and bynum all get in a bus tonight and dennis hopper blows it up and they all die painful deaths
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 01:10 AM
If Wally and Sasha have trade value, then so does Bonner, Vaughn, Udoka, Oberto...
Wally has an expiring to the tune of 13mil. Something the spurs don't have.
turiaf for president
01-20-2009, 01:10 AM
If Wally and Sasha have trade value, then so does Bonner, Vaughn, Udoka, Oberto...
cept wally has a 13 million dollar contract that expires this year
turiaf for president
01-20-2009, 01:11 AM
Wally has an expiring to the tune of 13mil. Something the spurs don't have.
doh. beat me to it
IronMexican
01-20-2009, 01:11 AM
What made you guys think this game would be exciting? Unlesd it turned into the Kobe-Bron show, it was going to be boring. The Cavs have a great team, but apart from LBJ, a boring one.
ElNono
01-20-2009, 01:12 AM
Uh huh. Like I said, this game wasn't that big a deal to begin with. I am looking forward to Sunday though.
I hate Sunday early games. Cuts my day in two.
Thunder Dan
01-20-2009, 01:12 AM
Can Ferry ship his ass out with Wally for something good.
I don't know that ain't my job, wrong dan.
I'd send him on a boat and blow it up
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 01:13 AM
What made you guys think this game would be exciting? Unlesd it turned into the Kobe-Bron show, it was going to be boring. The Cavs have a great team, but apart from LBJ, a boring one.
Usually close games are exciting. Except Gasol, Fisher with that jumper outta the time-out, Ariza had to ruin it.
Spur-Addict
01-20-2009, 01:14 AM
I'm going to bed, fuck those asshole who invented the pacific time zone, I hope them, pavlovic, kellen winslow, pau gasol, rondo and bynum all get in a bus tonight and dennis hopper blows it up and they all die painful deaths
:lmao
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Arts/Arts_/Pictures/2007/11/30/hopper460.jpg
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 01:14 AM
I don't know that ain't my job, wrong dan.
I'd send him on a boat and blow it up
We would get a good trade exception out of that. Get er' done Ferry.
Thunder Dan
01-20-2009, 01:15 AM
Kobe won't be playing gutair hero in his undies with his boyfriends tonight...he will have to stick to the skin flute
IronMexican
01-20-2009, 01:16 AM
Anyways, does anyone else think that girl from The Invited is real cute
Spur-Addict
01-20-2009, 01:17 AM
What made you guys think this game would be exciting? Unlesd it turned into the Kobe-Bron show, it was going to be boring. The Cavs have a great team, but apart from LBJ, a boring one.
I don't know, lets say two of the top teams in the league right now squaring off. Or it could possibly be the fact that the two best perimeter players in the game were being showcased here tonight. Or maybe it could be the fact that Lebron dropped Forty one on those fools the last time they met I believe. Or the fact that LBJ is up in the head to head match up category. It could be any one of those or a combination of those, or some unannounced additives that I missed.
scanry
01-20-2009, 01:19 AM
LA had too much fire power. They just kept trapping LBJ and the Cavs scrubs pretty much either bricked a shot or turned over the ball.
LA had size, skill and depth, and that killed Cleveland. Kobe had a great game considering his injury.
I hate to say this, but LBJ was mugged all game. But that didn't matter too much as Kobe was equally mugged on the other end.:lol
Bynum & Pavlovic are punks for taking cheap shots at players heads.:rolleyes
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:19 AM
I don't know, lets say two of the top teams in the league right now squaring off. Or it could possibly be the fact that the two best perimeter players in the game were being showcased here tonight. Or maybe it could be the fact that Lebron dropped Forty one on those fools the last time they met I believe. Or the fact that LBJ is up in the head to head match up category. It could be any one of those or a combination of those, or some unannounced additives that I missed.
LBJ up in the head to head makes it exciting?
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:21 AM
did Bynum even touch Lebrons head?
Spur-Addict
01-20-2009, 01:26 AM
LBJ up in the head to head makes it exciting?
Yes, yes it does. It makes it exciting for me at least, take that however you want to. It's extra exciting when he drops big numbers in the match ups. :D
cobbler
01-20-2009, 01:26 AM
did Bynum even touch Lebrons head?
Nope. Watched in in slo mo many times. He went for the ball with his left hand and his arm hit LBJ in the chest. LBJ threw his head back to accentuate the foul and Doug Collins in all his BS wonder says Bynum went for the chin. He never touched any part of LBJ's face or head.
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 01:27 AM
did Bynum even touch Lebrons head?
There was another play in the first half where Bynum hit LB in the head.
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 01:27 AM
Well, the LakeShow proved they can beat the Cavaliers when they're missing two starters and L.A. is given free reign to anally rape LeBron every time he comes within ten feet of the basket.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:28 AM
Nope. Watched in in slo mo many times. He went for the ball with his left hand and his arm hit LBJ in the chest. LBJ threw his head back to accentuate the foul and Doug Collins in all his BS wonder says Bynum went for the chin. He never touched any part of LBJ's face or head.
Doug Collins makes it seems as if he gave Lebron a bloody nose.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:28 AM
Well, the LakeShow proved they can beat the Cavaliers when they're missing two starters and L.A. is given free reign to anally rape LeBron every time he comes within ten feet of the basket.
we just doing what we're suppose to do....
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 01:29 AM
No disrespect intended to the LakeShow, BTW. Cavs were shorthanded and the officiating was slanted, though.
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 01:29 AM
we just doing what we're suppose to do....
Yeah, yeah, you hit some shots, etc etc.
turiaf for president
01-20-2009, 01:33 AM
No disrespect intended to the LakeShow, BTW. Cavs were shorthanded and the officiating was slanted, though.
please.... lebron had contact in the paint but so did kobe. infact cleveland shot 19 free throws to lakers 15.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:33 AM
No disrespect intended to the LakeShow, BTW. Cavs were shorthanded and the officiating was slanted, though.
no worries. It was a close game...im sure u lost to other teams by a bigger margin.
oh wait.....
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 01:36 AM
please.... lebron had contact in the paint but so did kobe. infact cleveland shot 19 free throws to lakers 15.
Kobe got three or four touch fouls on jump shots. LeBron was getting hammered without a whistle.
Just take the home cooking. We get it too. It's all good.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:40 AM
Kobe got three or four touch fouls on jump shots. LeBron was getting hammered without a whistle.
Just take the home cooking. We get it too. It's all good.
its all good!
cobbler
01-20-2009, 01:40 AM
No disrespect intended to the LakeShow, BTW. Cavs were shorthanded and the officiating was slanted, though.
No disrespect to the Cav's but the Lakers were also shorthanded and the fouls favored the Cavs 17-14 and they went to the line more too.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 01:43 AM
I didn't really expect the Cavaliers to win tonight. Even though the Lakers still have 1 starter and backup PG out, their depth is still too much for the Cavs. It showed when the bench came in and pumped up the lead. You can tell LeBron was tired in the 4th when he was missing his shots.
LeBron needs one more star on his team that can take over for him in the 4th ala Shaq/Kobe. That 4th quarter beating was a bit embarrassing.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:45 AM
he'll have Wade with him in NY in 2010
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 01:46 AM
No disrespect to the Cav's but the Lakers were also shorthanded and the fouls favored the Cavs 17-14 and they went to the line more too.
Two starters >>>>>>>> Backup point guard.
LakeShow was the better, healthier team tonight. They had a huge advantage in the frontcourt and they exploited it, to their credit. The statistics don't explain the officiating disparity, but I won't belabor it any more. LA was better tonight, period. See you in Cleveland on Feb. 8.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 01:46 AM
he'll have Wade with him in NY in 2010
That would be pretty bad-ass.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 01:47 AM
Two starters >>>>>>>> Backup point guard.
LakeShow was the better, healthier team tonight. They had a huge advantage in the frontcourt and they exploited it, to their credit. The statistics don't explain the officiating disparity, but I won't belabor it any more. LA was better tonight, period. See you in Cleveland on Feb. 8.
It's close. Lakers also had 1 starter out.
2 starters > 1 starter, 1 backup PG.
I didn't really expect the Cavaliers to win tonight. Even though the Lakers still have 1 starter and backup PG out, their depth is still too much for the Cavs.
Walton ? :lol C'mon man.
I don't think anyone can take anything from this game.
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 01:47 AM
LeBron needs one more star on his team that can take over for him in the 4th ala Shaq/Kobe. That 4th quarter beating was a bit embarrassing.
Teams tend to underperform when they're missing 40 percent of their starting lineup.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 01:49 AM
Walton ? :lol C'mon man.
I don't think anyone can take anything from this game.
The offense runs much better when Walton's in. He's actually playing well this year.
I don't remember exactly but I don't think the Lakers have lost with Walton as the starting SF yet.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:49 AM
Two starters >>>>>>>> Backup point guard.
LakeShow was the better, healthier team tonight. They had a huge advantage in the frontcourt and they exploited it, to their credit. The statistics don't explain the officiating disparity, but I won't belabor it any more. LA was better tonight, period. See you in Cleveland on Feb. 8.
Two starters >>>>>>>> Backup point guard = 17 point margin?
Teams tend to underperform when they're missing 40 percent of their starting lineup.
Although, sometimes the depleted team is even more dangerous and over performs. Luckily today wasn't one of those times.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 01:50 AM
Teams tend to underperform when they're missing 40 percent of their starting lineup.
That's true. I just didn't expect them to lose by 17.
dirk4mvp
01-20-2009, 01:51 AM
The offense runs much better when Walton's in. He's actually playing well this year.
I don't remember exactly but I don't think the Lakers have lost with Walton as the starting SF yet.
lmao, what a cheesedick.
Lakerfans ridicule this guy nonstop until it fits their argument.
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 01:51 AM
Two starters >>>>>>>> Backup point guard = 17 point margin?
Never thought I'd see a LakeShow fan so happy about beating the Cavaliers by 17 points. :lol
The offense runs much better when Walton's in. He's actually playing well this year.
I don't remember exactly but I don't think the Lakers have lost with Walton as the starting SF yet.
I could careless. I still prefer Walton sitting on the bench. Only in LA under Phil Jackson would this scrub get playing time.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 01:52 AM
lmao, what a cheesedick.
Lakerfans ridicule this guy nonstop until it fits their argument.
Not me, dickface. I think Luke does a vital job in the Laker offense. He and Lamar Odom are the two best passers and initiators in the triangle offense.
Philip thinks so too, that's why Luke is a starter.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 01:53 AM
Only in LA under Phil Jackson would this scrub get playing time.
Absolutely.
But he fits the triangle like a glove, if not for the triangle, he's pretty useless.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:53 AM
Never thought I'd see a LakeShow fan so happy about beating the Cavaliers by 17 points. :lol
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOT! PARTY TIME!!! 17 point beat down!!
Not me, dickface. I think Luke does a vital job in the Laker offense. He and Lamar Odom are the two best passers and initiators in the triangle offense.
Philip thinks so too, that's why Luke is a starter.
No, it's more like, Vlade was so pathetic that Phil had no choice but to use Walton. Walton = no shot, no defense, no nothing. His passing is vastly overated. The ball isn't even in his hands much. He's a scrub.
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 01:56 AM
Yo kno what JoeTait...ur right...you guys would have played better with your starters in full health. Lakers win 105-95. Happy?
dirk4mvp
01-20-2009, 01:57 AM
Not me, dickface. I think Luke does a vital job in the Laker offense. He and Lamar Odom are the two best passers and initiators in the triangle offense.
Philip thinks so too, that's why Luke is a starter.
Him and Lamar Odumb are the two worst players who get consistent minutes on the Lakers.
lmao, dickface.
Absolutely.
But he fits the triangle like a glove, if not for the triangle, he's pretty useless.
Ok, I'll give you that. He's fortunate that he knows the triangle well. Because we all know Phil cherishes his lil tri.
KidCongo
01-20-2009, 02:01 AM
The Lakers were too tall. Having a healthy Z would change that alot.
JoeTait75
01-20-2009, 02:01 AM
Yo kno what JoeTait...ur right...you guys would have played better with your starters in full health. Lakers win 105-95. Happy?
105-99.
Hold on. Our interior D would have been better with Z out there. How about 95-89?
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 02:03 AM
105-99.
Hold on. Our interior D would have been better with Z out there. How about 95-89?
deal...u guys lost this game by 6!
TheMACHINE
01-20-2009, 03:22 PM
Lakers Highlights
http://www.lakersmedia.com/video/index.php?p=724
DPG21920
01-20-2009, 04:43 PM
"It was a huge deal," Gasol said. "We didn't want to come out of this game with another loss on our home court. It was important for us to bounce back tonight. This is a significant victory for us. The defensive effort was outstanding."
mystargtr34
01-20-2009, 09:09 PM
Why is it so hard for Lakers fans to admit the Cavs were missing alot more than they were.
Z is a 15-8 Center. Probably the second best C in the East. Delonte has proven to be a pretty crucial part to what they do. You cant argue that Jordan Farmer, a 15 MPG guy and Luke Walton, who has started less than a quarter of the games because the guy ahead of him sux, equate to or are even close to those two guys.
Im not saying the Cavs win in LA with a full strength team, but you simply cant argue against the fact the Cavs were missing their 3rd and 4th best player, while the Lakers were missing there 7th and 8th best players, and that it didnt effect the outcome of the game.
cobbler
01-20-2009, 09:25 PM
Why is it so hard for Lakers fans to admit the Cavs were missing alot more than they were.
Z is a 15-8 Center. Probably the second best C in the East. Delonte has proven to be a pretty crucial part to what they do. You cant argue that Jordan Farmer, a 15 MPG guy and Luke Walton, who has started less than a quarter of the games because the guy ahead of him sux, equate to or are even close to those two guys.
Im not saying the Cavs win in LA with a full strength team, but you simply cant argue against the fact the Cavs were missing their 3rd and 4th best player, while the Lakers were missing there 7th and 8th best players, and that it didnt effect the outcome of the game.
Probably for the same reason that when Laker fans last year said it would have been a different finals if we had Bynum and Ariza all the Celtic, Spurs, and other Laker hating fans cried "excuses excuses".
I agree the absence of Z was a larger loss. But don't discredit the loss of Walton so easily either. Maybe hes not a superstar, but the loss of him means we have to start spaceballs which is a double whammy. And not having Farmar hurts not so much cause Farmar is good but cause it makes Fish have to play too many minutes.
We can go back and forth on every game where players are out... doesn't matter. It didn't last year because regardless, the celts have the trophy just as the Lakers have the win last night. All else is conjecture.
Time to move on....
mystargtr34
01-20-2009, 09:33 PM
Probably for the same reason that when Laker fans last year said it would have been a different finals if we had Bynum and Ariza all the Celtic, Spurs, and other Laker hating fans cried "excuses excuses".
I agree the absence of Z was a larger loss. But don't discredit the loss of Walton so easily either. Maybe hes not a superstar, but the loss of him means we have to start spaceballs which is a double whammy. And not having Farmar hurts not so much cause Farmar is good but cause it makes Fish have to play too many minutes.
We can go back and forth on every game where players are out... doesn't matter. It didn't last year because regardless, the celts have the trophy just as the Lakers have the win last night. All else is conjecture.
Time to move on....
Im puzzled as to how Walton gets minutes. Rad is a dead-eye shooter and spaces the floor well for Kobe. Im not sure what Luke does, hes a good passer but given that theres Kobe and Pau and sometimes Odom on the floor, all excellent passers - i dont see the need for him at anytime.
Maybe i dont watch enough Laker games.
cobbler
01-20-2009, 09:49 PM
Im puzzled as to how Walton gets minutes. Rad is a dead-eye shooter and spaces the floor well for Kobe. Im not sure what Luke does, hes a good passer but given that theres Kobe and Pau and sometimes Odom on the floor, all excellent passers - i dont see the need for him at anytime.
Maybe i dont watch enough Laker games.
Walton gets the team playing the triangle. While Rad may spread the floor, he also is the weakest link on defense and starts a snowball effect of switches because he either lost sight of his man or simply decided to triple team the opposing PG. The wholr Rad spreading the floor concept is a tad weak in my opinion too because Fish isnt really a penetrating PG. Fish hangs at the 3 pt line enough to spread the D and Gasol is also adept enough at the midrange to bring his defender out. No Laker fan will tell you Walton is a great player. He just knows the offense and gets the team involved. Rad is purely one deminsional.... and a bonifide idiot.
Allanon
01-20-2009, 10:21 PM
Im puzzled as to how Walton gets minutes. Rad is a dead-eye shooter and spaces the floor well for Kobe. Im not sure what Luke does, hes a good passer but given that theres Kobe and Pau and sometimes Odom on the floor, all excellent passers - i dont see the need for him at anytime.
Maybe i dont watch enough Laker games.
Without Walton, there are too many shooters and not enough playmakers.
Kobe, Pau, Bynum, Rad, Fish...every single one of them wants to shoot. It's a bad combination from what I've seen. Either Luke or Odom have to start with that 4 or else the offense stagnates, too much dribbling not enough touches, etc.
KidCongo
01-21-2009, 12:15 AM
Walton gets the team playing the triangle. While Rad may spread the floor, he also is the weakest link on defense and starts a snowball effect of switches because he either lost sight of his man or simply decided to triple team the opposing PG. The wholr Rad spreading the floor concept is a tad weak in my opinion too because Fish isnt really a penetrating PG. Fish hangs at the 3 pt line enough to spread the D and Gasol is also adept enough at the midrange to bring his defender out. No Laker fan will tell you Walton is a great player. He just knows the offense and gets the team involved. Rad is purely one deminsional.... and a bonifide idiot.
His 2 threes did give the Lakers momentum. Can Walton hit that 3 ball?
cobbler
01-21-2009, 12:20 AM
His 2 threes did give the Lakers momentum. Can Walton hit that 3 ball?
Yes. Two years ago prior to his injury he was amoungst the league leaders but Rad is the better 3pt shooter no doubt. Again, Rad may get 2-4 3's in a game but his defensive liabilities diminish his worthiness. Especially against 3pt shooting teams because he tends to wander and leave the line wide open.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.