Log in

View Full Version : sarah palin steps down as governor



Pages : 1 2 [3]

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 03:08 AM
But according to some, no one hardly ever heard of these nasty rumors.Dishonest. And idiotic. Nobody ever claimed no one heard. The internet was buzzing.

This board was buzzing...you saw the bumped thread.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 03:08 AM
Why can't you play it straight, Iggy?

whottt
07-06-2009, 03:08 AM
:lol Of course you don't recall.

Where did the loons post it?

I told you to go bump the original thread for your fucking link...you were obviously too fucking stupid to figure out how to do that for yourself so I have now posted a link for you for the first time in probably 3 or 4 years mainly for the benefit of igkni...and of course you reacted just as I expected you would.


Ha ha.

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 03:09 AM
Newsprint and TV are the national media, and they didn't touch it.

So is the Huffington Post since they are being used as reliable sources by MSNBC.

The Huffington post recently had to pull a journal about making fun of Trig.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 03:12 AM
I told you to go bump the original thread for your fucking link...you were obviously too fucking stupid to figure out how to do that for yourself so I have now posted a link for you for the first time in probably 3 or 4 years mainly for the benefit of igkni...and of course you reacted just as I expected you would.You expected me to disprove your claim that the mainstream media ran with the Bristol is Trig's mom rumor?

Neat.

No wonder you didn't want to try to argue it yourself. Now hours later your only hope is trying to argue the Kos was the mainstream media you were talking about all along.


Ha ha.Indeed.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 03:15 AM
By your definition...but you're a whore and idiot. Your definition doesn't count. Everybody can decide for himself. Holding out Kos as a mainstream source is tendentious.


Since even your partisan blog has removed it, I don't know why you would expect it to still be floating around "legitimate" news sources...


I'm not saying that it isn't...I'm just saying I just stuck the National Media straight up your dumb fucking ass.You can't prove your point, you refuse to prove it, so you just fall back on lame definitions and over the top vulgarity.

How pathetic.

whottt
07-06-2009, 03:24 AM
Everybody can decide for himself.
You mean the liberals can keep being liberals.




Holding out Kos as a mainstream source is tendentious.

I don't what's funnier, the fact that you consider our more traditional news outless as bipartisan or the fact that even the fucking partisan blog has remoced it and you don't think that's relevant to a lack of links(not that the links don't exist)



You can't prove your point, you refuse to prove it, so you just fall back on lame definitions and over the top vulgarity.

LOL. You either don't know what media means(and seem to be working under the impression that it must claim to be bipartisan) don't know what a journalist is, or consider your politics to be above your humanity...


How pathetic.

Pathetic is going after children, not cyberbuttfucking the assholes that think it's funny.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 03:30 AM
You know what...I bet you I can find you calling her bitch. I think I will look for that one...if not I can just find you agreeing with boutons, he calls her a bitch every time he mentions her name, and I don't recall you ever saying a word about it.

Hopefully I can find it, it's been a while since you melted down good.Here's a search for my use of the word "bitch" in this forum.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/search.php?searchid=1422035

In truth, the list is shorter than I thought. It shouldn't take you long to thoroughly examine it, as your stated goal is to make me "melt down good."

Good luck!

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 03:32 AM
I don't what's funnier, the fact that you consider our more traditional news outless as bipartisanI said Kos isn't traditional (MSM) media. The inference that MSM is bipartisan is yours and yours alone. I do not share it.

Why can't you play it straight, whottt?


or the fact that even the fucking partisan blog has remoced it and you don't think that's relevant to a lack of links(not that the links don't exist)Google caches almost everything, dummy. Somebody, somewhere saved the page. You were unable to back up your bs, as usual. Keep digging.



Pathetic is going after children, not cyberbuttfucking the assholes that think it's funny.Who thinks it's funny?

I said upstream I think it was improper to go after Sarah Palin's kids. I certainly never went after them.

Are you still talking to me, whottt, or is this another stupid universalization?

whottt
07-06-2009, 03:47 AM
I said Kos isn't traditional (MSM) media. The inference that MSM is bipartisan is yours and yours alone. I do not share it.


I said National Media.




Why can't you play it straight, whottt?

I do play it straight, if I see someone going after Obama's kids, I won't think it funny or that he deserved it. I also won't think he made props of them or pranced them out on stage.



Google caches almost everything, dummy.
Google is about as bipartisan as boutons is. That said, your're right, they did catch it, and I have repeatedly pointed out that the links are out there.



Somebody, somewhere saved the page. You were unable to back up your bs, as usual. Keep digging.

But I can back it up...had it not been for the valiant but ultimately futile effort from ignki to have an intelligent discourse with you guys, you wouldn't have even gotten the kos link.

I want you guys to post it, they are obviously there I am not lying, I just sat there and read them, once you post them and admit that they are exactly that, I'll believe you worth the effort of a civil discourse.





I said upstream I think it was improper to go after Sarah Palin's kids. I certainly never went after them.

Well, hey, I'm sure Robert Byrd never burnt any negroes at the stake either, I guess that makes it alright. Oh wait a second...I forgot who I am arguing with.




Are you still talking to me, whottt, or is this another stupid universalization?

Still here...Manumaniac was wrong when he said I come here to vent, if anything reading the crap here gives me a need to vent...I come here to procrastinate when I don't want to study for exams.

whottt
07-06-2009, 03:50 AM
Here's a search for my use of the word "bitch" in this forum.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/search.php?searchid=1422035

In truth, the list is shorter than I thought. It shouldn't take you long to thoroughly examine it, as your stated goal is to make me "melt down good."

Good luck!

Yeah, I guess it's not like you could delete the offending posts or anything. You win that one. I'll remember that next time you and boutons are commiserating.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 03:51 AM
I want you guys to post it, they are obviously there I am not lying, I just sat there and read them, once you post them and admit that they are exactly that, I'll believe you worth the effort of a civil discourse.What do you want us to post?

The links that you have been asked to post?

That's a good one.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 03:51 AM
But I can back it up...had it not been for the valiant but ultimately futile effort from ignki to have an intelligent discourse with you guys, you wouldn't have even gotten the kos link.

I want you guys to post it, they are obviously there I am not lying, once you post them and admit that they are exactly that, I'll believe you worth the effort of a civil discourse.*Do my homework for me, then I'll respect you!*

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 03:54 AM
Really, whottt, that's WC caliber argumentation.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 03:56 AM
Yeah, I guess it's not like you could delete the offending posts or anything.:lmao

God damn you are in full excuse mode tonight.

Please, o please ask a mod to look at the logs to see if I have deleted any posts. I said it was indeed possible, so I had no reason to delete anything. You just were so damn sure of yourself, I figured you knew when I did it.


You win that one.Shit, you didn't even try. Pathetic.


I'll remember that next time you and boutons are commiserating.You'll remember that you lost without even trying?

Cool.

whottt
07-06-2009, 04:19 AM
:lmao

God damn you are in full excuse mode tonight.

Please, o please ask a mod to look at the logs to see if I have deleted any posts. I said it was indeed possible, so I had no reason to delete anything. You just were so damn sure of yourself, I figured you knew when I did it.

I never said I was 100% certain you said it....


I was
A. 100% certain that you spoke for the liberals on this forum when you asnswered my question of why ya'll attack her.

B. 100% certain that you have political kindred spirits on this very forum that have. And you've got absolutely problem with them doing it.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 04:22 AM
I never said I was 100% certain you said it....


I was
A. 100% certain that you spoke for the liberals on this forum when you asnswered my question of why ya'll attack her.

B. 100% certain that you have political kindred spirits on this very forum that have. And you've got absolutely problem with them doing it.People do what they want. You want me to complain whenever someone calls Palin a bitch?

You don't even do that.

Don't add hypocrisy to the unprecedented lameness you are displaying tonight.

whottt
07-06-2009, 04:23 AM
What do you want us to post?

The links that you have been asked to post?

That's a good one.

I posted a link. I posted the very first link I told you to go look up. It was a waste a time as I knew it would be, just as any further ones will also be...unlesss of course, you guys post them yourself. I'm telling you they are out there.

My link qualifies as National Media, it qualifies as world media, it's a got an audience of over a million people per week, potentially much larger, on the largest shared information source in the entire world, and professional journalists write for it. It practically qualifies as government media, as pointed earlier.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 04:26 AM
I posted a link. I posted the very first link I told you to go look up. It was a waste a time as I knew it would be, just as any further ones will also be...unlesss of course, you guys post them yourself. I'm telling you they are out there.Too bad I had already found that link in another blog entry that I did post here and already knew that it didn't work anymore.

Go ahead and look for it.

It's there.

It would prove that you are not a complete douche.


My link qualifies as National Media, it qualifies as world media, it's a got an audience of over a million people per week, potentially much larger, on the largest shared information source in the entire world, and professional journalists write for it. It practically qualifies as government media, as pointed earlier.Pointed out by whom?

You?

You and your opinion are far less important than you think.

Please go and look for my link.

Prove yourself.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 04:27 AM
So then the Kos debunking is legit, whottt? It reached the same *national* audience, and the Democratic party poobahs behind Kos obviously wanted the debunking out there.

(Sorry for the edit, CD. You beat me to the punch again)

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 04:29 AM
So then the Kos debunking is legit in your eyes?Nationally legit.

Professionally legit.

Millions of readers legit.

whottt
07-06-2009, 04:30 AM
People do what they want. You want me to complain whenever someone calls Palin a bitch?

You don't even do that.

Don't add hypocrisy to the unprecedented lameness you are displaying tonight.

I'm doing it now, are you?



Tell you what, I'm not posting anymore fucking links, why don't ya'll just post the original announcement of Bristol Palin's pregnancy by the McCain campaign, it'll give ya'll a chance to shit on a teenage girl again, which I know ya'll enjoy, and I think it'll clear things up sufficiently.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 04:33 AM
I pass.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 04:33 AM
I'm doing it now, are you?You must do it from now on, for any perceived sexist attack or perceived attack against children. And I'm talking any attack.

I'm not going to bother doing it myself, because my panties aren't bunched up about it like yours.


Tell you what, I'm not posting anymore fucking links, why don't ya'll just post the original announcement of Bristol Palin's pregnancy by the McCain campaign, it'll give ya'll a chance to shit on a teenage girl again, which I know ya'll enjoy, and I think it'll clear things up sufficiently.Why would it clear things up?

Maybe you should post a link to it and explain why it would clear things up.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 04:35 AM
Tell you what, I'm not posting anymore fucking links*I've tried nothing and I'm all out of ideas!*

whottt
07-06-2009, 04:41 AM
You must do it from now on, for any perceived sexist attack or perceived attack against children. And I'm talking any attack.

I generally do.





I'm not going to bother doing it myself, because my panties aren't bunched up about it like yours.

Why would it clear things up?

Becasue they make it clear that reports in the MSM about Bristol being the mother of Trig were a reason they were making the announcement.

That simple enough for you?

Those articles are also prevalent enough, probably because they(Palins) have no desire to sue themselves for libel, to where google challenged morons and people lacking the brain power to think there just might be government co-op projects between the state of Alaska and the Government of Russia, given the fact that are like 2 feet away from each other, that are operated under the partial umbrella of authority of the Governor of Alaska...can find them.



Maybe you should post a link to it and explain why it would clear things up.

It wouldn't do any good. It never does.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 04:44 AM
I generally do.Generally, you don't. From what I've seen, it's only been when your imaginary girlfriend is involved. Feel free to show me other examples, though.


Becasue they make it clear that reports in the MSM about Bristol being the mother of Trig were a reason they were making the announcement.

That simple enough for you? So those MSM reports of those rumors should be quite easy for you to find and present to us.


It wouldn't do any good. It never does.God danm you are a whiny bitch -- and I don't mean that in a sexist way.

whottt
07-06-2009, 04:53 AM
Generally, you don't. From what I've seen,
You pretty much see what you want to see Chump, and what you don't not at all.




it's only been when your imaginary girlfriend is involved. Feel free to show me other examples, though.
Would serve absolutely no positive purpose.
You don't care about kids being attacked, if you did, you'd notice my participation in threads where it's reported.




So those MSM reports of those rumors should be quite easy for you to find
They were...



and present to us.

Not worth it.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 05:05 AM
You pretty much see what you want to see Chump, and what you don't not at all. Turn it around on yourself, Sigmund Freud. The shoe fits. Classic projection.


Would serve absolutely no positive purpose.
You don't care about kids being attacked, if you did, you'd notice my participation in threads where it's reported. *Read my posts! If you don't, you don't care about the children!*

Grandiose much?


Not worth it.*I'm a chickenshit liar. I never had the links.*

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 05:05 AM
You pretty much see what you want to see Chump, and what you don't not at all.[quote]I see the word bandies about all the time with not a peep from you.

[quote]Would serve absolutely no positive purpose.
You don't care about kids being attacked, if you did, you'd notice my participation in threads where it's reported.You don't care about it unless your imaginary girlfriend is involved. I don't really care about these kinds of attacks enough to actually do anything about them outside the internets, and I'm sure you don't either.


They were...So post them.



Not worth it.CTRL+C, CTRL+V.

It's that simple.

People who aren't pussies do it all the time.

Did you even post a link tonight?

I know you bumped the mother/grandmother thread by accident and then tried to act like you were providing a public service, but I really don't remember any others -- just your saying they're out there.

whottt
07-06-2009, 05:17 AM
I posted a link on page 19 of this thread...you notice I posted that link before I bumped the thread. It is not to the daily kos site, it is to the wiki article on the Daily Kos...


The reason I did it that way, before I deliberately bumped the original Palin thread...is so you guys could click on the link and see why it most definitely qualifies as a National Media source.

Which I assume you did...since you were obviously in this thread before you saw the Palin bump....unfortunately, the reasoning behind my posting a link to the wiki article and not the kos site itself was totally lost on ya'll being the complete fucking dumbasses that ya'll are.



That you guys having your own fucking rag stuck up your ass would not sit well with you was obvious, which is exactly why that was the one I chose...the rebuttal to the excuse I was going to get was already in the link from the moment I posted it.


You got a link, you got the first one I told you about, and you got it without me having to actually dirty my keyboard by typing the actual URL of that rag.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 05:21 AM
I posted a link on page 19 of this thread...you notice I posted that link before I bumped the thread. It is not to the daily kos site, it is to the wiki article on the Daily Kos...Oh yeah, that was sooooooooooooooo helpful.



The reason I did it that way, before I deliberately bumped the original Palin thread...is so you guys could click on the link and see why it most definitely qualifies as a National Media source.Wow -- wikipedia!

Dependable stuff.


That you guys having your own fucking rag stuck up your ass would not sit well with you was obvious, which is exactly why that was the one I chose...the rebuttal to the excuse I was going to get was already in the link from the moment I posted it.Ok, so according to you the national media also debunked the rumor, diffusing the attack on Bristol.

Cool.

The system works!

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 05:23 AM
So one national media outlet ran with the rumor and quickly debunked it.

Ok.

whottt
07-06-2009, 05:29 AM
Turn it around on yourself, Sigmund Freud. The shoe fits. Classic projection.

I've never attacked Obama's kids or defended those that did.




*Read my posts! If you don't, you don't care about the children!*

Hey...a non-dumbass would realize I'm pretty much not going to post any links. The one you got you can thank igkni for.



Grandiose much?

You have now surpassed all the previous stupid statements you have made during this "argument" by an incredibly large margin.


*I'm a chickenshit liar. I never had the links.*

I don't care what someone who puts politics above children thinks of me, trust me, what I think of you is far worse.

whottt
07-06-2009, 05:33 AM
Oh yeah, that was sooooooooooooooo helpful.


Wow -- wikipedia!

Dependable stuff.

It's got links to the actual articles from the journalists and politicans. Lots of em...with your fondness for links, I figured you'd appreciate that.



Ok, so according to you the national media also debunked the rumor, diffusing the attack on Bristol.

Cool.

The system works!

It was libel, of course they're going to cover their ass. The other national media reports of it did that as well, they stated they were rumors as they were reporting it...doesn't change the fact that they went after a child soley on the basis of her mother being nominated for VP, which was my point.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 05:36 AM
Say whottt, do you consider ArcXIX and Inky99 respected professional journalists?

And how can they be "after" Bristol if they are constantly debunking the rumor?

Explain that to all of us.

And give us those links.

Thanks.

Winehole23
07-06-2009, 05:42 AM
trust me, what I think of you is far worse.I have no doubt.

But it could look bad to other posters. They may notice you're full of shit.

whottt
07-06-2009, 05:52 AM
Say whottt, do you consider ArcXIX and Inky99 respected professional journalists?

About on the same level as Keith Olberman. Why do you ask?

I don't have a much better opinion of the politicians that have written articles for them either.....doesn't mean they aren't respected professional politicians, to idiots.




And how can they be "after" Bristol if they are constantly debunking the rumor?



Explain that to all of us.

Because they went after Bristol Palin, doesn't matter if they were simultaneously debunking it, they went after the child and it's as simple as that.

They drug her into a Presidential Campaign, to hurt her mom. That's exactly what they did.



And you're defending it, excusing it, minimizing it, attempting to invalidate it, because you don't like Palin, that's exactly what you're doing.

Whinehole too.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 05:59 AM
About on the same level as Keith Olberman. Why do you ask?So that is a yes.

You consider ArcXIX and Inky99 professional, mainstream national journalists?

Could you please put that in the form of a sentence.

I, whottt, consider ArcXIX and Inky99 to be professional mainstream national journalists.


I don't have a much better opinion of the politicians that have written articles for them either.....doesn't mean they aren't respected professional politicians, to idiots.Are you calling yourself an idiot for considering ArcXIX and Inky99 as being respected professional journalists?


Because they went after Bristol Palin, doesn't matter if they were simultaneously debunking it, they went after the child and it's as simple as that.No, it is not as simple as that.

Your logic is that any news outlet reporting the reason Palin decided to disclose her daughter's pregnancy was out to get her daughter. It simply isn't so.

You are paranoid for your imaginary girlfriend's children. It's pretty disturbing.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 06:01 AM
And you're defending it, excusing it, minimizing it, attempting to invalidate it, because you don't like Palin, that's exactly what you're doing.

Whinehole too.More paranoia.

Please tell us all what you are doing about this in the real world.

I say you are doing nothing about it.

Nothing at all.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 06:18 AM
So what are you going to do about boutons' attack on Pallin?

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3525854&postcount=4

He called her a bitch, and you told us you were a real man of action when it comes to these things.

whottt
07-06-2009, 06:30 AM
So that is a yes.

You consider ArcXIX and Inky99 professional, mainstream national journalists?

I consider the Daily Kos to be National Media.

I do not know the real identities of the douchebags you named, for all I know they're Katie Couric and Keith Olberman, I am not going to type their names out, but yeah, I consider them as professional as the majority of the mainstream media. In fact if they probably had a better viewership than the majority of MSNBC programs at that time.




Could you please put that in the form of a sentence.

I, whottt, consider ArcXIX and Inky99 to be professional mainstream national journalists.

I whottt consider those two doucebags to be par for the course for the media with the regards to their ethics and willingness to attack children in the cause of aiding their political agenda.


Are you calling yourself an idiot for considering ArcXIX and Inky99 as being respected professional journalists?


No...I'm not saying that at all, and frankly it's kind of stupid for you to draw that conclusion.


No, it is not as simple as that.

Your logic is that any news outlet reporting the reason Palin decided to disclose her daughter's pregnancy was out to get her daughter. It simply isn't so.

I'm really not saying that at all, I'm saying they attacked her daughter to hurt her, it had nothing to do with Palin disclosing her daugther's pregnancy, as it was done before her daughter's pregnancy was known or disclosed.




You are paranoid for your imaginary girlfriend's children. It's pretty disturbing.

I'm not paranoid, they attack her daughter in the mass media, they attack her daughter on the internet, they attack her daugher on this forum because they don't like her mother because of their political agenda...and I'm glad you finally found someting disturbing, to bad it was the wrong thing.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 06:36 AM
I consider the Daily Kos to be National Media.

I do not know the real identities of the douchebags you named, for all I know they're Katie Couric and Keith Olberman, I am not going to type their names out, but yeah, I consider them as professional as the majority of the mainstream media. In fact if they probably had a better viewership than the majority of MSNBC programs at that time.:lol

Go ahead, since it's the way you feel -- you don't have to type them. Copy and paste. I showed you how.


I whottt consider those two doucebags to be par for the course for the media with the regards to their ethics and willingness to attack children in the cause of aiding their political agenda.That wasn't the quote. You really aren't good at this.


No...I'm not saying that at all, and frankly it's kind of stupid for you to draw that conclusion.Hey, you kicked yourself in the ass just a day or so ago -- how am I to know it's not a trend?


I'm really not saying that at all, I'm saying they attacked her daughter to hurt her, it had nothing to do with Palin disclosing her daugther's pregnancy, as it was done before her daughter's pregnancy was known or disclosed.Except it wasn't. You won't post any articles because there aren't any. I know this game.


I'm not paranoid, they attack her daughter in the mass media, they attack her daughter on the internet, they attack her daugher on this forum because they don't like her mother...and I'm glad you finally found someting disturbing, to bad it was the wrong thing.They -- they -- they.

Who is they?

Oh right -- respected professional national mainstream journalists ArcXIX and Inky99.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 06:45 AM
Hey, whottt. Maybe you missed it the other times I told you.
So what are you going to do about boutons' attack on Pallin?

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3525854&postcount=4

He called her a bitch, and you told us you were a real man of action when it comes to these things.You're just going to let him get away with this vicious attack?

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 06:54 AM
Dude, someone is attacking Palin and her kid there now!

Do something, whottt! Generally do something!

whottt
07-06-2009, 07:01 AM
Hey, whottt. Maybe you missed it the other times I told you.You're just going to let him get away with this vicious attack?

I've told boutons to put a shotgun in his mouth and pull the trigger several times and generally say something of an equivalent nature about once a month. I'd say our relationship is at best strained. What I would like you from and the other liberals on this forum, is to tell him to drop it or shut the fuck up at least as often as I suggest he put a shotgun in his mouth and pull the trigger. I don't really think it's too much to ask.

If you do this...I just might provide links.

That said, I find boutons calling Palin a bitch pretty offensive but at the same time, it's not on the same level as going after kids.

I expect these sorts of actions be denounced by anyone who terms themself progressive, liberal or considers themself to be in anway an intelligent and civilized person.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 07:04 AM
I've told boutons to put a shotgun in his mouth and pull the trigger several times and generally say something of an equivalent nature about once a month. I'd say our relationship is at best strained. What I would like you from and the other liberals on this forum, is to tell him to drop it or shut the fuck up at least as often as I suggest he put a shotgun in his mouth and pull the trigger. I don't really think it's too much to ask.

If you do this...I just might provide links.

That said, I find boutons calling Palin a bitch pretty offensive but at the same time, it's not on the same level as going after kids.

I expect these sorts of actions be denounced by anyone who terms themself progressive, liberal or considers themself to be in anway an intelligent and civilized person.So you demand political correctness or else there will be consequences.

Consequences meaning you will talk Buddy Holly level smack.

That's quite brave of you, Internets Avenger.

And you can't provide links you don't have.

whottt
07-06-2009, 07:15 AM
So you demand political correctness or else there will be consequences.

Consequences meaning you will talk Buddy Holly level smack.

That's quite brave of you, Internets Avenger.

And you can't provide links you don't have.

Whatever, at least I'm not running for help because I'm losing an internet argument.

ElNono
07-06-2009, 07:49 AM
damn this thread has veered off the tracks faster than sarah palin's political career

Par for the course when whottt is getting his ass handed to him...

whottt
07-06-2009, 07:56 AM
damn this thread has veered off the tracks faster than sarah palin's political career

Seriously we're so far off course I think I just saw your prediction that no one would be talking about her two months after she was nominated.

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 08:52 AM
damn this thread has veered off the tracks faster than sarah palin's political career

Almost as useful as 4cc's Notre Dame journalist degree.

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 08:53 AM
*journalism

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 08:54 AM
Par for the course when whottt is getting his ass handed to him...

It's funny the Chump groupies that show up after the fact, Pixel, baseline bum, and now ElNono.

If you were even paying attention.

boutons_deux
07-06-2009, 09:34 AM
Whott's sorry, bitch-slapped ass recoomends I kill myself. That's about the only way he could escape my non-stop, devastating bitch-slapping.

Like all Macho Men, he's really a pussyfied wimp, Talks Big, Carries a Small Dick.

ElNono
07-06-2009, 09:36 AM
It's funny the Chump groupies that show up after the fact, Pixel, baseline bum, and now ElNono.

If you were even paying attention.

I posted in this thread way before you did. Who's showing up after the fact?

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 09:38 AM
I posted in this thread way before you did. Who's showing up after the fact?

oh yes you did, i'm not talking about the thread, i'm talking about this particular spat.

ElNono
07-06-2009, 09:40 AM
oh yes you did, i'm not talking about the thread, i'm talking about this particular spat.

Well, considering I had my own set of spats with whottt, I was just speaking from experience.

rjv
07-06-2009, 09:43 AM
This is the deal. People who knocked on this girl more often than not have the lesbians,fags,blacks,mexicans and democrats on there side. Making all those comments about Palin and her kids were wrong. It still is wrong. I have zero respect for those assholes who did not say it was wrong. If you want to get down on that level and start calling out these groups of people they will claim u are a bigot and a racist. It's fucking CRAZY. Lets put the fags and fake lesbians in there place. Build a stronger border and let the blacks know not to vote for a president based on color.


:lmao (palin=this type of intellect^^^^^)

ratm1221
07-06-2009, 01:02 PM
Quitter.

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 01:03 PM
Quitter.

Golden State vs Dallas 2007 forum.

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 01:09 PM
gtownspur forum

Mookie boning 4cc's girl forum.

ChumpDumper
07-06-2009, 01:43 PM
It's funny the Chump groupies that show up after the fact, Pixel, baseline bum, and now ElNono.

If you were even paying attention.I assume they keep more normal hours than whottt and I do.

baseline bum
07-06-2009, 03:03 PM
It's funny the Chump groupies that show up after the fact, Pixel, baseline bum, and now ElNono.

If you were even paying attention.

I haven't even posted in this thread until now, you fucking retard. You have mastered the art of kicking your own ass so well in this forum. Now you can resume throwing more shit against the wall.

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 03:31 PM
I haven't even posted in this thread until now, you fucking retard. You have mastered the art of kicking your own ass so well in this forum. Now you can resume throwing more shit against the wall.

Oh no!! what did i do?? oh no, here comes baseline bum :lmao!

Seriously, i saw you lurking here for an hour last night waiting to stick your foot in, but then since i predicted your cheerleading ass would show up, you staved off from posting till now!

And you still posted after the fact, just like i said! :lmao:lmao

You're not too complex.

atleast Pixel Pusher did the wise thing and stayed away.

George Gervin's Afro
07-06-2009, 03:32 PM
Oh no!! what did i do?? oh no, here comes baseline bum :lmao!

Seriously, i saw you lurking here for an hour last night waiting to stick your foot in, but then since i predicted your cheerleading ass would show up, you staved off from posting till now!

And you still posted after the fact, just like i said! :lmao:lmao

You're not too complex.

atleast Pixel Pusher did the wise thing and stayed away.

stalker..and a dumb one at that.

Ignignokt
07-06-2009, 03:34 PM
stalker..and a dumb one at that.

That would require me to post after you or baseline. But i was here first. Whose the stalker now jotito?:lol

baseline bum
07-06-2009, 03:41 PM
Oh no!! what did i do?? oh no, here comes baseline bum :lmao!

Seriously, i saw you lurking here for an hour last night waiting to stick your foot in, but then since i predicted your cheerleading ass would show up, you staved off from posting till now!

And you still posted after the fact, just like i said! :lmao:lmao

You're not too complex.

atleast Pixel Pusher did the wise thing and stayed away.

LOL. You must seriously be 15 or younger.

mookie2001
07-06-2009, 04:46 PM
Whatever, at least I'm not running for help because I'm losing an internet argument.
OH stuff, another classic DUMP by whottt :ihit
please hammer dont hurt em

LnGrrrR
07-07-2009, 09:52 AM
They've never gone after anyone kids like they have Palin's. It's not like the Bush girls got a free pass...but what's been done to Palin, and the they I refer to it encompasses the totality of the liberal movement in this country, from bloggers or new outlets that produce it, to the media that report it, to the disingenuous fuckwads that pretend A. That they don't know what I'm talking about and B. That it's justified.

So are you saying that everyone, every person of left-leaning political persuasion, believes the above?

Or are you saying that one bad apple spoils the bunch?

And note: I am only a Democrat because I currently don't like the Republicans. If Republicans could get their stuff together, and decided to develop a strong set of policies, it might be a different story.

LnGrrrR
07-07-2009, 10:15 AM
Are you dense.

Racist comments about OBama = disparaging comments about a kid.

On the surface they seem equal. But when someone actually takes of their Yes We Can rose colored glasses, they see the comparison is ridiculous.

ONE is a full grown Man, the other is a child. Whose going to handle it better.

And if you want to compare chelseas experience with the palins, you're another dishonest partisan bot.

Reading comprehension. It helps.

DarkReign
07-07-2009, 10:15 AM
I have no doubt.

But it could look bad to other posters. They may notice you're full of shit.

Youre a regular, youre smart, little advice though...

When whottt and CD get going, dont bother responding as if youre even invloved or that you even exist. Because you dont. They both enjoy this. Dont ask why.

You can flush that advice, as opinions are like...

LnGrrrR
07-07-2009, 10:21 AM
Ha ha.

Should we get a total of people who didn't get this one too?

The idiot count from the last one is still 1 (whottt).

To be fair, I thought you might have been talking about ploto's tits. :rollin

Winehole23
07-07-2009, 10:27 AM
When whottt and CD get going, dont bother responding as if youre even invloved or that you even exist. Because you dont. They both enjoy this. Dont ask why..It's good advice and I usually keep it.

In this case, I was responding directly to something whottt said to me.

DarkReign
07-07-2009, 10:31 AM
It's good advice and I usually keep it.

In this case, I was responding directly to something whottt said to me.

Ah, my bad. Carry on, good sir.

whottt
07-07-2009, 10:38 AM
It's good advice and I usually keep it.

In this case, I was responding directly to something whottt said to me.

I appreciate your commentary towards boutons, I just might have to send you some links.


I still want to know why you expect them to be there when they are libelous claims and even the "partisan blog" has removed them from their site.


Does their absence on the Daily Kos now constitute proof that I am making up their role in this too?

Furthermore, you claim mass media was defined as TV and newsprint(the true definition is based upon potential audience size BTW), yet you are asking for internet links to them?

I mean even if I give you a link to a CNN story that is on the internet, that doesn't prove it was on TV.

Do you not see the contradiction?

JoeChalupa
07-07-2009, 10:59 AM
All I know is that she is about to make serious, serious cash and is pretty much set for life now.

Winehole23
07-07-2009, 10:59 AM
I still want to know why you expect them to be there when they are libelous claims and even the "partisan blog" has removed them from their site. Google cache? Right-blogistan screen captures?


Does their absence on the Daily Kos now constitute proof that I am making up their role in this too?They scrubbed it. I don't think you're making that up.


Furthermore, you claim mass media was defined as TV and newsprint(the true definition is based upon potential audience size BTW), yet you are asking for internet links to them? Since we're having an online discussion, yes. It's easier than than finding it on microfiche at the library or finding stale TV programming, somehow, on TV.

I kept to *mainstream* and *traditional* as qualifiers. If you want to talk about *mass* media, of course I accept your definition. But that's not what we were talking about. We were talking about the takedown of Palin in the *respectable, traditional* media. Trig-gate didn't have any oxygen to breathe there, or at least, you could not show that it did.

The *anything goes* free-wheeling internet, naturally, was another case entirely.


I mean even if I give you a link to a CNN story that is on the internet, that doesn't prove it was on TV. Hulu? Youtube? Tivo?