PDA

View Full Version : Basketball Purgatory..



HarlemHeat37
05-09-2010, 09:44 PM
Are the Spurs officially here yet?..they probably have been for over a year now, but I guess we can say it's official now, considering they spent so much money last Summer for a minimal reward..

What can the Spurs do about this?..they can't fully rebuild, because a team with Duncan/Parker/Ginobili and others will not be bad enough to miss the playoffs and get a lottery pick, unless there are some major injuries..

They can't win a title, because there is no longer a legit #1 option on this team..Duncan, Ginobili and Parker are all low-tier #2 or high-end #3 options at this point..you can't win in the NBA like that..



Are the Spurs going to continue being like the Malone/Stockton Jazz, where they don't rebuild and continue to pile up 1st round/2nd round exits?..did Ginobili's extension pretty much guarantee that the Spurs are going to be stuck in mediocrity until he and Timmy retire?..

I don't see the point TBH..

What is the realistic solution?..Do we have to accept the reality that the Spurs are going to be stuck here for a few more years?..Is there any chance at rebuilding right now?..Are the fans in favor of rebuilding?..

Mr.Bottomtooth
05-09-2010, 09:50 PM
I'm not ready to believe that they are. There's still an offseason to go and they can still make moves. If they come back next season with basically the same roster, then yeah.

HarlemHeat37
05-09-2010, 09:51 PM
What kind of move would actually turn the Spurs back into a contending team though?..

Don't you think they would need to get a guy that can at least be a legit #2 option?..I don't really see how that's possible..

Mr.Bottomtooth
05-09-2010, 09:52 PM
Jefferson is key though. I really think we need to find a way to deal him and his nasty contract in order to keep on going.

Mr.Bottomtooth
05-09-2010, 09:53 PM
What kind of move would actually turn the Spurs back into a contending team though?..

Don't you think they would need to get a guy that can at least be a legit #2 option?..I don't really see how that's possible..

I haven't been on the ball with how the offseason looks like this year, so I can't give a good explanation.

TDMVPDPOY
05-09-2010, 09:53 PM
What kind of move would actually turn the Spurs back into a contending team though?..

Don't you think they would need to get a guy that can at least be a legit #2 option?..I don't really see how that's possible..

a big to play down low with duncan, and a long 3 who can play defense and spread the floor

bonner, mason, rj, bogans needs to go seriously...

DPG21920
05-09-2010, 09:54 PM
I have said more than likely the Spurs are screwed from a contender standpoint. Besides some very lucky or wild trade, they cannot be a contender for the next few years. They will slowly start to rebuild while remaining competitive.

Then once Tim is done, the full rebuild will begin.

Spurs Brazil
05-09-2010, 09:54 PM
What kind of move would actually turn the Spurs back into a contending team though?..

Don't you think they would need to get a guy that can at least be a legit #2 option?..I don't really see how that's possible..

I think I can dream so I hope TP get a full summer of rest and then we'll see the 2009 Tony again. With that Tony I believe we can be a much better team.

Sign Tiago, trade Jefferson for a guy who can give us something and believe

HarlemHeat37
05-09-2010, 09:56 PM
I agree that the Spurs can make some moves that could make them a lot better than this year, but I don't think it's possible to win a title again with the current core, barring a Gasol-like collusion trade..unfortunately, only LA would get such a deal..

So I guess we have to accept that the Spurs are going to be a good team that isn't really a legit contender..

ffadicted
05-09-2010, 09:59 PM
So much fail in this thread man, next year is going to be a great opportunity to go far in the playoffs and make a last push. Tony will (hopefully) be healthy all season, Ginobili has proven he still has all-star quality level left, and timmy (as shitty as he was this season at times) is still VERY underappreciated for what he does.

If we get Splitter here and get jefferson to provide more, we look good. A trade or something to get some three point shooters would also help, and hopefully we can get a decent backup SF in the draft.

Calm the fuck down

Marco
05-09-2010, 09:59 PM
Developing our young players would make sense, Pop permitting.

peskypesky
05-09-2010, 10:00 PM
trade Parker for a really good center. that's our only hope.

Budkin
05-09-2010, 10:01 PM
Splitter!

024
05-09-2010, 10:04 PM
about half way through the season, i could tell the core was done. the ginobili extension didn't exactly thrill me. spurs will have to patiently wait for a good trade or start trading off players like ginobili. honestly, i think the spurs will need a legit low post presence. judging from the current trajectory, duncan can't be the legit low post offense the spurs have relied on for the last decade. duncan's decline robbed the spurs of a player of superstar level so until the spurs can get someone similar back, they will be a borderline playoff team.

Brazil
05-09-2010, 10:05 PM
trade Parker for a really good center. that's our only hope.
:lol

and you give the keys of the car to who ? Hill ? he is a SG. Manu ? he will be older next year and can't run the point during a whole season IMO, he is better playing along side with TP.
If you trade parker it would be only for an elite PG.

TP has been the most reliable spurs during these 10 games

Death In June
05-09-2010, 10:06 PM
Do we have to accept the reality that the Spurs are going to be stuck here for a few more years?Yes. Unless the spurs land some superstar in the offseason, this team will be stuck at the 50 win mark, around the 4-8 seed until Duncan retires. There are FAs to be had, but no cap space to work with. There are a few contracts to toy around with, but I can see Holt gunshy about any future spending decisions. The spurs will be a good team until Duncan is gone, but I doubt they'll ever be great again during his tenure.

The_Worlds_finest
05-09-2010, 10:11 PM
They need a big to back up Timmy

phxspurfan
05-09-2010, 10:13 PM
They need a big to back up Timmy

This

coyotes_geek
05-09-2010, 10:13 PM
What is the realistic solution?..Do we have to accept the reality that the Spurs are going to be stuck here for a few more years?..Is there any chance at rebuilding right now?..Are the fans in favor of rebuilding?..

You go down swinging. Do what is within your power to put the best team you can out there for Tim's last years. If that means 1st and 2nd round playoff exits, so be it. But you definitely keep fighting.

z0sa
05-09-2010, 10:16 PM
There's reasons to believe we can still go all the way again if all the right pieces fall in place.. that's the problem in cheering for a fringe contender. You go in knowing that your heart will most likely be ripped out. Only choice is enjoy it, I guess. Every last second of the pain.

TD 21
05-09-2010, 10:17 PM
I'd rather take another chance with this core than start the re-build. Why is everyone seemingly looking forward to this? It's inevitable at some point and it's going to be a long, grueling slog, that almost certainly won't bear anything close to as much fruit as this core has.

Maybe they are done winning championships, but I'd rather have an outside chance at it than not have a chance at all. Unless the Spurs sink so low that they can get a true, legitimate franchise player, they have no chance at a championship in the future. What you'll get is a run of the mill young team with a limited upside, similar to the Hawks right now or a team like the Grizzlies. Sure, they look good on paper, but is that core ever going to be enough to even make a conference finals? Not likely.

If that mediocre reality is in the not so distant future anyway, why not take another chance with this core? And you're selling this core short. Maybe none are top tier first options anymore, but lower second tier? Get real. The Magic are one of three teams with a shot at a championship and they don't have a top tier first option.

As up and down as this team was, two-three quality, realistic moves and they put themselves in position to have a chance at contending again. And if they don't win another one? By then, the re-build will have commenced, whether they want it to or not.

Chomag
05-09-2010, 10:18 PM
:lol

and you give the keys of the car to who ? Hill ? he is a SG. Manu ? he will be older next year and can't run the point during a whole season IMO, he is better playing along side with TP.
If you trade parker it would be only for an elite PG.

TP has been the most reliable spurs during these 10 games

You maybe right but there just is nothing other then TP that has trading value for the Spurs

Trading a player does not mean allways that they suck. You have to give to get, and if the spurs want something quality TP is the only player with enough value to draw something.

Chomag
05-09-2010, 10:21 PM
I'd rather take another chance with this core than start the re-build. Why is everyone seemingly looking forward to this? It's inevitable at some point and it's going to be a long, grueling slog, that almost certainly won't bear anything close to as much fruit as this core has.

Maybe they are done winning championships, but I'd rather have an outside chance at it than not have a chance at all. Unless the Spurs sink so low that they can get a true, legitimate franchise player, they have no chance at a championship in the future. What you'll get is a run of the mill young team with a limited upside, similar to the Hawks right now or a team like the Grizzlies. Sure, they look good on paper, but is that core ever going to be enough to even make a conference finals? Not likely.

If that mediocre reality is in the not so distant future anyway, why not take another chance with this core? And you're selling this core short. Maybe none are top tier first options anymore, but lower second tier? Get real. The Magic are one of three teams with a shot at a championship and they don't have a top tier first option.

As up and down as this team was, two-three quality, realistic moves and they put themselves in position to have a chance at contending again. And if they don't win another one? By then, the re-build will have commenced, whether they want it to or not.

A year older for the big 3 where they are shown to be quickly on the decline. Stand pat once again? Spurs have shown they are not even close to beimg contenders, no way a band aid move would put them on top once again.

z0sa
05-09-2010, 10:21 PM
I will say this: If Parker plays like 2009 again, if Manu can maintain his level of play and stay relatively injury free, if Tim can get some help down low, and a lot of it, while our young guns keep growing and getting better, there's still a lot of reasons to believe. We have to make some adjustments, though.

superjames1992
05-09-2010, 10:28 PM
So much fail in this thread man, next year is going to be a great opportunity to go far in the playoffs and make a last push. Tony will (hopefully) be healthy all season, Ginobili has proven he still has all-star quality level left, and timmy (as shitty as he was this season at times) is still VERY underappreciated for what he does.

If we get Splitter here and get jefferson to provide more, we look good. A trade or something to get some three point shooters would also help, and hopefully we can get a decent backup SF in the draft.

Calm the fuck down

Good post.

HarlemHeat37
05-09-2010, 10:31 PM
-Manu and Timmy have proven they can be all-stars for half a year..Manu didn't show up in the 1st half of the season and Duncan wore down from carrying the team in the 1st half of the season..

-Can't assume TP is going to be healthy, it's not a guarantee..

-Jefferson can't provide more..he's not a championship-caliber player..he's too mentally weak, can't spread the floor and doesn't play any defense..

I'm not denying the abilities of the big 3, they're all still very good players, but it's tough to win with an old core and with none of them being top 5 players in the NBA..



I fully agree that the Spurs should continue to attempt at building a title team while Duncan is there, btw, but the expectations for this team will obviously have to be lowered, which is tough on ST..

J_Paco
05-09-2010, 10:48 PM
A year older for the big 3 where they are shown to be quickly on the decline. Stand pat once again? Spurs have shown they are not even close to beimg contenders, no way a band aid move would put them on top once again.

Who is quickly on the decline? Duncan is obviously declining, but he can still rebound and defend at a high level. Parker just had the best year of his career a year ago, but injuries destroyed any chance he had of following it. Ginobili had his best year since 2008, but needs to be limited in his use for now on.

I believe the front-office and coaching staff really needs to infuse this team with more young, athletic and defensive-minded players. They choose to play Hill and Blair, but neglected in forwarding the development of Malik and Ian. Instead, minutes were given to Bogans, Mason Jr., Bonner and McDyess. Unfortunately, 3 out of 4 of these rotation players flamed out through the grind of the season and playoffs.

I give Bonner credit because he played (on offense/shooting) better these last 2 games, but that was pretty much too little to late. Hairston and Mahimnhi probably wouldn't have been enough to defeat Phoenix, but they would've grown from the experience during the season and playoffs.

If the organization truly believes that Parker, Duncan and Ginobili have another title run in them then giving them more (young) help is necessary. If they can (finally) acquire Splitter, draft a impact SF with the 20th pick, find more reliable outside shooting and actually play more young players they have a chance. I don't believe that the current league has very many elite teams, really there are only three (Orlando, Cleveland and Los Angeles), but they are all flawed and beatable. Look at how Phoenix improved themselves enough from out of the playoffs last season to a deep run the next.

There is tons of parity, especially in the western conference and the Spurs just need to make the right moves.

TD 21
05-09-2010, 10:50 PM
A year older for the big 3 where they are shown to be quickly on the decline. Stand pat once again? Spurs have shown they are not even close to beimg contenders, no way a band aid move would put them on top once again.

For the first time in three years (assuming Parker doesn't play in the World Championships) the big three will enter a season healthy, rested and not having to take half a year to get back into rhythm/shape. Obviously, Duncan and Ginobili are at an age where they can't maintain brilliant play for an entire season, but I also think Duncan held up a lot better this season than he was given credit for.

Parker, people forget, he's right at his peak. I hope he doesn't play this summer and returns to his form from a season ago, because people have quickly forgotten that he's one of the best scorers in the league. Is he a clear cut go to guy for a championship team? Probably not, but the other two make it so none of them have to be the guy by himself.

Who said anything about standing pat? It's obvious this team needs to sign Splitter, get a quality free agent and get a solid draft pick, preferably one that can contribute some next season. I just don't think re-building now is the way to go.


-Manu and Timmy have proven they can be all-stars for half a year..Manu didn't show up in the 1st half of the season and Duncan wore down from carrying the team in the 1st half of the season..

-Can't assume TP is going to be healthy, it's not a guarantee..

-Jefferson can't provide more..he's not a championship-caliber player..he's too mentally weak, can't spread the floor and doesn't play any defense..

I'm not denying the abilities of the big 3, they're all still very good players, but it's tough to win with an old core and with none of them being top 5 players in the NBA..

I fully agree that the Spurs should continue to attempt at building a title team while Duncan is there, btw, but the expectations for this team will obviously have to be lowered, which is tough on ST..

Didn't show up? It took him a half season to get into proper shape/rhythm and build confidence. I expect more consistency from Ginobili next season. Not as high as his peak this season, but not as low as his low, either. Duncan did wear down, but he should have more help on the front line next season and like I said, he held up a lot better than he was given credit for.

Can't assume any player is going to be healthy, it's never a guarantee. His track record is fairly strong though and for the most part his injuries were of the freak variety. He's not in their class, but people forgot how great Wade and now Paul are because of one injury plagued season and that's happening to Parker now. So long as he sits out the summer, I expect a big season from him next season. He's got a lot of mileage, but he's still young enough to think this season was more injury than decline related. People made that mistake with Ginobili and he's older than Parker. You don't go from your peak season to a steep decline instantly, without injury playing a major factor

I tend to agree with Jefferson, but by the trade deadline he'll become movable. The big thing for him is re-establishing himself as a corner three ball shooter. He shot it well last season from there, so it's not like it's unrealistic to expect him to do so again.

I agree, it's definitely tough and it's unlikely, but like I said, I'd rather take an outside chance with them (the Spurs owe Duncan that) than start a re-build that's inevitably not too far off anyway.

Depends on what they do in the off season, in terms of expectations. The way I see it, there's only three teams head and shoulders above them and the best two are in the East. As long as they're around fifth best, they'll have a shot, if they are healthy and draw a favorable match-up, or have one of the other contenders bow out early. It's not a great spot to be in obviously, but it's also not as doom and gloom as so many make it sound.

Nbadan
05-09-2010, 10:52 PM
Step 1: move Jefferson.....

Nbadan
05-09-2010, 10:55 PM
Step 2: Move Mason...

NewJerSpur
05-09-2010, 11:04 PM
Step 2: Move Mason...

He's a free agent and is the only certain exit from SA at this point.

It was nice to see Pop giving Hill more time this year after the debacle that happened against Dallas in 2009. And Blair received more minutes than Hill did as a rookie in his first playoff stint, so the young guys are being brought along while the team is still in contention.

We need to figure out what else, if anything, we have on the current bench between Temple (played well down the stretch in crucial action), Hairston (has shown flashes but needs to provide consistency in at least one area of his game), and Ian (I'm not sure if there will ever be anything there) to go along with the draft picks from last year that were not brought in immediately and the guys that will be added this year.

michaelwcho
05-09-2010, 11:16 PM
Hey guys, didn't the Suns get good with free agents and modest draft picks? Seems to me the Spurs could do the same. We didn't lose to them because of their big 3 or our big 3.

Stringer_Bell
05-09-2010, 11:21 PM
Hey guys, didn't the Suns get good with free agents and modest draft picks? Seems to me the Spurs could do the same. We didn't lose to them because of their big 3 or our big 3.

You shut your logic speaking mouth right now!!!!

But for real, I'm not scared about this team staying in tact. Only a complete idiot of a coach and GM would think we have enough guns on hand for a Championship fight next season. *waits for the bump in 1 year when nothing has changed*

Marcus Bryant
05-09-2010, 11:34 PM
LOL.

Basketball purgatory is being a contender every season and not once bringing home a trophy. Spurs fans truly do not understand how good they've had it over the last decade.

DaDakota
05-10-2010, 12:13 AM
You guys are where my Rockets were when Hakeem was in decline.....you had the best player in the league in Duncan, but he is slowing down......

Rebuilding is painful....trust me.

;)

DD

EricB
05-10-2010, 12:14 AM
You guys are where my Rockets were when Hakeem was in decline.....you had the best player in the league in Duncan, but he is slowing down......

Rebuilding is painful....trust me.

;)

DD

Nice try but no.

objective
05-10-2010, 12:25 AM
Purgatory isn't that bad a word. HH37 isn't that offbase.

The issue is that I fail to objectively see how the Spurs on paper could improve to the point where they would be seen as better than PHX or LA. And that's ignoring the east, and ignoring the possibility that Utah could have a top 3 pick.

Let's be honest, everyone is counting on Tiago Splitter. That's great. Even if he signs, and that's a big if, that pretty much just leaves them with minimum salaries, the draft, and maybe the LLE to improve the squad.

I love Splitter. I think Splitter will instantly be a legit starting caliber center. But next season Robin Lopez will be back, and he's already proven himself as a legit starting center. Does Tiago Splitter really leapfrog the Spurs over a Suns team with Lopez?

Then the argument becomes about how much better Hill and Blair can become, maybe even Hairston or the 20th pick who could be a small forward. Awesome. Will the progress be so much more than the improvement of Dragic and Dudley, and the fact the Earl Clark still isn't a part of their rotation?

So how on paper are the Spurs going to be any better than the team that just straight wrecked them?

Hell, will they be any better than Dallas? If Rick Carlisle hadn't Popped Beaubois that series goes 7, and I don't even know that the Spurs get out of the first round.

The most realistic, and optimistic offseason is signing Splitter and hoping someone decent falls to them in the draft and can play right away. That's not enough, not at this stage in the careers of the big 3. Unless there's a trade for a real upgrade using Jefferson, or some outlandish pie-in-the-sky fantasy blockbuster like Parker-Splitter-Jefferson for Bosh-Calderon, there's nothing else. And even that fever-dreamed lunacy wouldn't make the Spurs better necessarily, only different.

And that's the best case. Worst case . . . Splitter decides to wait out the looming workstoppage in Europe, and the Spurs are left with . . . what? The MLE on . . . who? Basically they'd just re-sign Bonner and pray.

Cant_Be_Faded
05-10-2010, 12:30 AM
I been sayin this since before last season begun.

We kinda in a fucked-mode for championship hopes cuz we're good enough to keep makin the playoffs but will never get a high enough pick without sucking balls.

So either you hope for a major injury to Duncan (which I would never EVER hope for)

Or you just stay satisfied with who we are until the Big FunD decides to retire.

ElNono
05-10-2010, 12:34 AM
My hope is that they can build a 2004 Pistons like team. No 'superstar' that stands out, but a solid team, with a solid system, playing solid defense. That would require better role players than what we had, and going back to putting the onus on the defense.
Some length on the wings, some shot blocking helping Tim, and good shooters on the wing. I think it can be done.

NewJerSpur
05-10-2010, 12:35 AM
Well, we've had pretty good success with the draft the last few years so I never count out getting on or two impactful guys there. Temple might also be a diamond in the rough. We'll have to see what free agents become available before we blow anyone off in terms of being a cheap, impactful signing.

Jefferson is not in the team's long term plans so he needs to go sooner than later, but who is going to take on that contract prior to the trade deadline?

Cant_Be_Faded
05-10-2010, 12:37 AM
My hope is that they can build a 2004 Pistons like team. No 'superstar' that stands out, but a solid team, with a solid system, playing solid defense. That would require better role players than what we had, and going back to putting the onus on the defense.
Some length on the wings, some shot blocking helping Tim, and good shooters on the wing. I think it can be done.

The only problem with that, is that was under a different NBA era, one where a scrubby defense-only, no-star team COULD win that championship. And that Pistons team did it with flying colors. Such respect for that Pistons team.

But the handcheck rule effectively killed that formula for success.

J_Paco
05-10-2010, 12:45 AM
Purgatory isn't that bad a word. HH37 isn't that offbase.

The issue is that I fail to objectively see how the Spurs on paper could improve to the point where they would be seen as better than PHX or LA. And that's ignoring the east, and ignoring the possibility that Utah could have a top 3 pick.

Let's be honest, everyone is counting on Tiago Splitter. That's great. Even if he signs, and that's a big if, that pretty much just leaves them with minimum salaries, the draft, and maybe the LLE to improve the squad.

I love Splitter. I think Splitter will instantly be a legit starting caliber center. But next season Robin Lopez will be back, and he's already proven himself as a legit starting center. Does Tiago Splitter really leapfrog the Spurs over a Suns team with Lopez?

Then the argument becomes about how much better Hill and Blair can become, maybe even Hairston or the 20th pick who could be a small forward. Awesome. Will the progress be so much more than the improvement of Dragic and Dudley, and the fact the Earl Clark still isn't a part of their rotation?

So how on paper are the Spurs going to be any better than the team that just straight wrecked them?

Hell, will they be any better than Dallas? If Rick Carlisle hadn't Popped Beaubois that series goes 7, and I don't even know that the Spurs get out of the first round.

The most realistic, and optimistic offseason is signing Splitter and hoping someone decent falls to them in the draft and can play right away. That's not enough, not at this stage in the careers of the big 3. Unless there's a trade for a real upgrade using Jefferson, or some outlandish pie-in-the-sky fantasy blockbuster like Parker-Splitter-Jefferson for Bosh-Calderon, there's nothing else. And even that fever-dreamed lunacy wouldn't make the Spurs better necessarily, only different.

And that's the best case. Worst case . . . Splitter decides to wait out the looming workstoppage in Europe, and the Spurs are left with . . . what? The MLE on . . . who? Basically they'd just re-sign Bonner and pray.

I get what your saying, Objective. But, you fail to mention that Amar'e is in all likelihood playing his last season in Phoenix, Grant Hill and Steve Nash will be another year older and the ceiling for the Phoenix role players (or even ours) may not be very high.

Utah and Phoenix will have just as many important decisions to make this off-season, while L.A.'s core of Bryant, Gasol, Artest, and Odom will all have more mileage on their bodies and are all 30+ years old.

If Splitter doesn't come over than the team is screwed, but if he does he'll be an instant upgrade to Matt Bonner. The 20th pick could yield a SF that has the athletic ability, perimeter shooting and defensive mind-set this team craves. Also, the team will need one or two of the young perimeter players (Gee, Hairston and Temple) to pan out. Which isn't too unreasonable since other such players (Shannon Brown, Wesley Mathews and Jared Dudley) have developed and contributed on playoff teams. And, there is the possibility that Jefferson could be dealt to also bolster the perimeter or front-court. Be more optimistic, bro.....

ElNono
05-10-2010, 12:47 AM
The only problem with that, is that was under a different NBA era, one where a scrubby defense-only, no-star team COULD win that championship. And that Pistons team did it with flying colors. Such respect for that Pistons team.

But the handcheck rule effectively killed that formula for success.

True, but I don't expect to hold down opponents under 80 points anymore.
But we have gone away from basic stuff. Good, solid rebounding. Some shot blocking. Good rotations. We won in 2007 playing pretty decent defense, and a lot better defense than what we play these days. Obviously that having a guy like Bruce was a huge difference. I'm not looking back at him, but I think we can get the personnel to play defense a lot better than we have been for the past two seasons. We've tried to win outscoring teams, and it's just a gimmick.

objective
05-10-2010, 01:01 AM
I get what your saying, Objective. But, you fail to mention that Amar'e is in all likelihood playing his last season in Phoenix, Grant Hill and Steve Nash will be another year older and the ceiling for the Phoenix role players (or even ours) may not be very high.

Utah and Phoenix will have just as many important decisions to make this off-season, while L.A.'s core of Bryant, Gasol, Artest, and Odom will all have more mileage on their bodies and are all 30+ years old.

If Splitter doesn't come over than the team is screwed, but if he does he'll be an instant upgrade to Matt Bonner. The 20th pick could yield a SF that has the athletic ability, perimeter shooting and defensive mind-set this team craves. Also, the team will need one or two of the young perimeter players (Gee, Hairston and Temple) to pan out. Which isn't too unreasonable since other such players (Shannon Brown, Wesley Mathews and Jared Dudley) have developed and contributed on playoff teams. And, there is the possibility that Jefferson could be dealt to also bolster the perimeter or front-court. Be more optimistic, bro.....

The Suns just made the WCF, they're re-signing Amare. And Frye. Sarver has a reputation for being cheap, and he's done enough to deserve it, but he's also paid the tax year in and year out and shelled out the dough in new contracts.

RE: Nash and Grant Hill and how they'll decline, I don't expect it. Let's just say that this is a lot like when the Red Sox looked at the numbers, looked at the odds, and looked at performance and decided Clemens just wasn't worth the money. Cuban did the same thing, and he was always big on stats, and also not shy at all about spending big time money. He so thorough that the lengths he'll go to and the money he'll spend just to know about particular stocks are incredible. He came to the same conclusion on his player. Clemens somehow found a way come back for many years of awe-inducing play, causing people to marvel at how incredible it was that he was able to stay in such good shape at his age. Nash and Grant Hill I'm sure are on the same awesome vitamin regimen, they'll be good for a couple years more.

And maybe the Spurs do luck out with the 20th pick. There's no guarantee Pop plays him enough to get him ready. Hell it's more likely to have more Bogans, Bonner, and an added vet scrub like Devean George to fill things out instead of Hairston or Temple or Gee or whoever.

Optimism, pessimism, I just try for objectivity.

ajh18
05-10-2010, 01:14 AM
Wow, listening to some of y'all overreact and flip out with pessimism is just sad.

This team is fine. Do we have a top tier superstar anymore? Probably not. Does that mean things are tougher? Sure. But who that's a contender actually has a top tier star? LA/Cleveland? Personnel wise, we are no worse off than Utah, Phoenix, or Boston. Dwight Howard can't even be called a top-tier star because he's offensively a liability.

Chemistry matters folks. Remember the old Blazers teams of a decade back? Totally STACKED with talent. But no chemistry. They never had "it". Meanwhile, we won a title with Jaren freaking Jackson playing a key role. Because he "fit" the needs.

I think bringing over Splitter is key. We NEED a good, mobile center next to Tim. Not a star, but a defensive presence and someone who can move, put up maybe 9 and 8 a game. If we can bring him over, run a four man frontline of Duncan, Splitter, McDysse, and Blair.

In the backcourt, run Manu, Tony, and Hill. Develop Temple as a long, fourth guard and third-string point. He can be a minute-eater during the regular season. He and Hill can eat up around 45 minutes a game between them, leaving Parker at around 30-35 and Manu at 20-25. This will keep both Tony and Manu relatively fresh for the playoffs.

The real weak link is at small forward. RJ is a slasher, but we actually now HAVE those at the guard spots. What we don't have is good defense and 3 point shooting. And Jefferson just doesnt fit those needs. I hope he can contribute, but I think we could actually "trade down" talent wise, for a good shooter and/or defender, and give Hairston some minutes, and be set. Fill the roster out with veteran 3 point specialists.

Remember, last year the Suns missed the playoffs. The Nash era was over. Then, they traded away Snaq, added some better fitting role players, and they're back in the WCF. And I wouldnt be that surprised to see them upset the Lakers either.

Stop overreacting. We have all the main pieces to be a contender for another couple of years. We just need to find complimentary pieces around them, let our young guys like Blair and Hill develop, and pray for health.

J_Paco
05-10-2010, 01:22 AM
The Suns just made the WCF, they're re-signing Amare.


Not if one of the teams with huge cap space (NY, Chicago, New Jersey, Clippers, etc.) throw max dollars with a front-loaded contract. Remember, that Joe Johnson left because Sarver wasn't willing to match Atlanta's front-loaded offer. I believe he won't be wearing a Suns jersey next season, not with huge dollars and the chance to play with (possibly) Wade on the line.

Hey, are you saying that Nash and Hill are rubbing "magic cream" like Bonds, Sheffield, Clemens and Pettite? Or, injecting their butts with Vitamin "S"?

objective
05-10-2010, 01:54 AM
Not if one of the teams with huge cap space (NY, Chicago, New Jersey, Clippers, etc.) throw max dollars with a front-loaded contract. Remember, that Joe Johnson left because Sarver wasn't willing to match Atlanta's front-loaded offer. I believe he won't be wearing a Suns jersey next season, not with huge dollars and the chance to play with (possibly) Wade on the line.

Hey, are you saying that Nash and Hill are rubbing "magic cream" like Bonds, Sheffield, Clemens and Pettite? Or, injecting their butts with Vitamin "S"?

Sarver didn't want to pay Johnson out of ego. He was even going to match the RFA deal but wanted to hear Johnson ask him to match it. When Johnson's pride wouldn't let him, Sarver let him go.

And yes, there's all sorts of things happening in PHX. It's not just flaxseed oil and controlling what time of day to have sugar. Everything has it's side effects, like Amare's knees and his eyeballs 1 soft poke away from falling out his skull and Gugliotta nearly dying on the team bus.

Nash's hip was all sorts of wrecked after the Portland series, but he gets 3 days of treatment and then he's superman. Someone would have to be willfully naive to think he was just getting some gua-sha or graston technique or tui-na. Same goes with Grant Hill. This guy couldn't stay on the court as a 100+ million dollar investment with the best doctors in the world coming to Orlando to help him. He goes to PHX and discovers how to balance his core, get good acupuncture for his meridians and adjust his chakras and suddenly he's the fountain of youth.

Take a look at Nash's face real carefully, he looks like The Man Who Fell to Earth. And I'm not hating, I support the legalization of any supplement/hormone/steroid under a doctor's supervision for any course of treatment, be it for athletics or even cosmetic. I'm just explaining why I don't think you'll see the decline that people have been predicting for 6-7 years now.

jjktkk
05-10-2010, 02:14 AM
My hope is that they can build a 2004 Pistons like team. No 'superstar' that stands out, but a solid team, with a solid system, playing solid defense. That would require better role players than what we had, and going back to putting the onus on the defense.
Some length on the wings, some shot blocking helping Tim, and good shooters on the wing. I think it can be done.

Which is not so impossible a task IMO. Better 3-point shooting would do wonders for the offense. The only obvious task, besides 3-point shooting, is to to upgrade the front line. Instead of a 4 that can stretch defenses, maybe Pop needs to go back to a "twin tower", more traditional lineup. Maybe the combination of Splitter, and McDyess can achieve that. A an athletic 3 with size is needed. Some might think thats too many needs, but I'm not one of them.