View Full Version : lol Best point guard in the NBA
Interviewer: Do you think you're the best point guard in the league?
Rondo: Do I think I'm the best?
Seconds later...
Rondo: Yes, I do.
Playing with the talent on the Celtics, shit I would average 5+ assists.
Nothing but a peace of shit bona fide scrub.
Rummpd
02-01-2011, 11:21 PM
Losing to the vaunted Kings right now!
Pelicans78
02-01-2011, 11:25 PM
Rondo's a very good PG.
HarlemHeat37
02-01-2011, 11:25 PM
Why would he say no?..
redzero
02-01-2011, 11:26 PM
Rondo's so good that the Lakers didn't even bother defending him in the Finals.
8FOR!3
02-01-2011, 11:28 PM
Rondo's a top 5 PG. He's not Chris Paul/Deron Williams though.
Darth_Pelican
02-01-2011, 11:31 PM
Put CP3, DWill, or Rose on a scrub team, and they will probably add about 10-12 wins for that team.
Put Rondo on a scrub team, and how many wins do you honestly think he adds? I say mabye 2.
Greg Oden
02-01-2011, 11:32 PM
obviously the OP is butthurt by this because he thinks Tony Parker is better than Rondo.
MavDynasty
02-01-2011, 11:36 PM
lol best pg in the NBA who can't shoot for shit.
reminds me of M>S with KG
Nahtanoj
02-01-2011, 11:37 PM
obviously the OP is butthurt by this because he thinks Tony Parker is better than Rondo.
Parker is better offensively.
redzero
02-01-2011, 11:40 PM
Parker is better offensively.
You do know that passing is a part of the offense, right?
LnGrrrR
02-02-2011, 12:42 AM
Losing to the vaunted Kings right now!
Premature ejaculation :lol
Killakobe81
02-02-2011, 12:58 AM
Rondo's a top 5 PG. He's not Chris Paul/Deron Williams though.
I'll co-sign this. he nees to improve his shot to get to the top 3 ...
Killakobe81
02-02-2011, 01:00 AM
oops wrong thread ...
#41 Shoot Em Up
02-02-2011, 01:02 AM
I can see him being best.
Is the OP on crack??? bona fide scrub??????
Hooks
02-02-2011, 05:18 AM
You do know that passing is a part of the offense, right?
Parker would probably average just as much or even more assists on the Celts. The Celts are staaaaaaaaacked with offensive weapons.
TP, Cp3, D-Will, Rose, Westbrook>Rondo
Bukefal
02-02-2011, 05:50 AM
Rondo's a very good PG.
No he's not. He's hype and of course he himself thinks he is :lol
As already said, put him on another team and see how he does/sucks.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 06:29 AM
Rondo is the best PG, and has been for a number of years.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 10:49 AM
Why would he say no?..
Because there are 2 PGs in the league that are superior. He is not humble, he is another cocky faggot Boston Celtic.
FUCK BOSTON, LA, & MIAMI
None of those teams are deserving of jack shit
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 10:52 AM
Because there are 2 PGs in the league that are superior. He is not humble, he is another cocky faggot Boston Celtic.
FUCK BOSTON, LA, & MIAMI
None of those teams are deserving of jack shit
He's humble >in game< if you watch him.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 10:54 AM
It's a shame he'll likely be a Celtic for all of his career. I CANNOT WAIT UNTIL PP, KG, SHAQ, AND RAYRAY ALLEN RETIRE. :lmao @ pest PG in league when cannot shoot for fuck and has all of these players to assist. Essentially, Rondo's numbers tell me he's just a product of the system, of his team. He's definitely a great player, but the guy never shoots and literally passes all game long...to that Celtics team...with a pretty damn strong bench as well. Seriously, in a couple of years, what's he gonna claim himself to be when he's averaging 5-7 assists per game and still bricking jumper after jumper?
CROFL Rondo
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 10:55 AM
He's humble >in game< if you watch him.
Claiming yourself to be the best PG in the world, when there are obviously better PGs out there, is pretty fucking ridiculous.
hater
02-02-2011, 10:59 AM
On a given night he can be the best PG out there. So I think ppl here are making too much ado about nothing.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 11:07 AM
Claiming yourself to be the best PG in the world, when there are obviously better PGs out there, is pretty fucking ridiculous.
But, his point is legitimately arguable, Al. Is it laid to rest? No. But, he, or, anybody that makes the argument for him is well within the margin of error.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 11:09 AM
It's a shame he'll likely be a Celtic for all of his career. I CANNOT WAIT UNTIL PP, KG, SHAQ, AND RAYRAY ALLEN RETIRE. :lmao @ pest PG in league when cannot shoot for fuck and has all of these players to assist. Essentially, Rondo's numbers tell me he's just a product of the system, of his team. He's definitely a great player, but the guy never shoots and literally passes all game long...to that Celtics team...with a pretty damn strong bench as well. Seriously, in a couple of years, what's he gonna claim himself to be when he's averaging 5-7 assists per game and still bricking jumper after jumper?
CROFL Rondo
He's a winner. There are damn few of those in this league.
Right now. This minute, I'd trade any one player off our roster for him/sans Kobe.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 11:28 AM
But, his point is legitimately arguable, Al. Is it laid to rest? No. But, he, or, anybody that makes the argument for him is well within the margin of error.
It is maybe legitimately arguable, there's no doubt he's great and he's very good defensively too. But when an interviewer asks you if you're the best, and you respond "Yes, I do" so assuredly when Chris Paul and Deron Williams exist...is just a complete slap in the face to those players.
He's a winner. There are damn few of those in this league.
Right now. This minute, I'd trade any one player off our roster for him/sans Kobe.
Don't give me that "winner" crap...he's not a proven individual winner my friend. No.
He is a Celtic. He is no more winner than D-Will. If Deron Williams is on the Celtics, they lose maybe 5 games all year long. And then sweep the playoffs entirely including the finals.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 11:31 AM
Right now. This minute, I'd trade any one player off our roster for him/sans Kobe.
I probably would too.
But that has nothing to do with anything, because you could also say the same for D-Will or Chris Paul or Derrick Rose. You would, don't deny it.
Cry Havoc
02-02-2011, 11:32 AM
You do know that passing is a part of the offense, right?
I find that odd, because as has been shown, Rondo seems to get the assists on offense even on plays where he didn't touch the ball, or made the 3rd to last pass to the guy that scored.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 11:32 AM
You're inconsolable over this Rondo, fellow, Al. It's personal with you.
You're never this outlandish otherwise.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 11:33 AM
I probably would too.
But that has nothing to do with anything, because you could also say the same for D-Will or Chris Paul or Derrick Rose. You would, don't deny it.
Not for Williams or Paul. I don't buy those two, at all.
Rose, I would admittedly consider it.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 11:35 AM
Giuseppe, question for ya. When the Miami Heat win a championship sometime in the next 3-4 years, will you also claim LeBron a winner? I wouldn't, for obvious reasons.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 11:37 AM
Giuseppe, question for ya. When the Miami Heat win a championship sometime in the next 3-4 years, will you also claim LeBron a winner? I wouldn't, for obvious reasons.
Mostly likely I'd have to, Al. In order for them to ring, James will have to go to the place where all champions go in order to ring. He won't ring at the level he's played at to this point.
ChrisRichards
02-02-2011, 11:37 AM
Giuseppe, question for ya. When the Miami Heat win a championship sometime in the next 3-4 years, will you also claim LeBron a winner? I wouldn't, for obvious reasons.
Thats stupid, tbh.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 11:38 AM
Not for Williams or Paul. I don't buy those two, at all.
Rose, I would admittedly consider it.
Well given if you're not trading Kobe for Rondo, you're going to have to give up Pau most likely. You're going to need offense, not just passing and never shooting. Is Rondo only going to pass to Kobe and average 13 assists there as well? Perhaps...but the Lakers would lose almost every game because a Laker team without Pau, given how much Kobe chucks...it would take probably 40 FGA per game from Mamba for Rondo to keep those averages up.
You would be much better off with a guy like CP3 or Deron Williams, who can do everything Rondo does while scoring a lot as well.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 11:42 AM
You're inconsolable over this Rondo, fellow, Al. It's personal with you.
You're never this outlandish otherwise.
I won't hesitate to admit I do not like the Celtics. I respect the shit out of essentially all of their players, and I'm clearly arguing against their attitudes in this thread.
To summarize and restate, when you are Rajon Rondo and Chris Paul and Deron Williams exist, you don't claim yourself to be the best PG in the league so assuredly.
Even Kobe Bryant might not do something like that when asked who is the best player in the league, all around. He might say he's the best one on one player, but I'm not sure he would respond:
"Me, next question, on to the next one. KD & Bron don't have shit over me."
I certainly would take either over Kobe at this point, but this is another one of those margin of error cases. None of those are miles ahead than the other.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 11:45 AM
Thats stupid, tbh.
If you interpret "winner" in the literal sense, you're right.
But I don't think Giuseppe meant it in the literal sense when describing Rondo. If he did, that would be equally stupid in this argument, since he said he'd take Rondo partially because he's a winner (literally a championship winner). Nazr Mohammed is a winner as well in this sense.
ChrisRichards
02-02-2011, 12:46 PM
If you interpret "winner" in the literal sense, you're right.
But I don't think Giuseppe meant it in the literal sense when describing Rondo. If he did, that would be equally stupid in this argument, since he said he'd take Rondo partially because he's a winner (literally a championship winner). Nazr Mohammed is a winner as well in this sense.
Oh well in that case, I agree with you.
ohmwrecker
02-02-2011, 12:58 PM
Rondo could probably be a much better scorer if he had to be. He just has more capable offensive weapons at his disposal.
In any other pertinent category, he is the most efficient PG in the league. His abilty to not be hindered by his limitations just makes him more effective.
Paul and Williams have their flaws as well.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 01:00 PM
His abilty to not be hindered by his limitations just makes him more effective.
Wrecker/goods/precise style.
Bito Corleone
02-02-2011, 01:08 PM
Probably the best point guard that is a zero scoring threat to ever play the game. That being said. There are many (at least 4) PGs in the NBA right now that are better.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 01:10 PM
Probably the best point guard that is a zero scoring threat to ever play the game. That being said. There are many (at least 4) PGs in the NBA right now that are better.
But, none of those have rang.
bostonguy
02-02-2011, 01:10 PM
No he's not. He's hype and of course he himself thinks he is :lol
As already said, put him on another team and see how he does/sucks.
Ah the "put him on another team" card being used here. Yes Rondo has flaws. Yes he isn't the best pg in the league. I bet Rondo would be successful anywhere else. The guy isn't a scrub and he isn't "all hype". He is a damn good pg. It helps that he doesn't have as much pressure, but the guy is talented. I can't believe you are denying that. :lmao:lmao
This is almost as funny as the other spurs fan who shat all over Perkins considering he is better than any other spurs big outside of Duncan.
ohmwrecker
02-02-2011, 01:19 PM
Bukefail should stick to making game threads tbh.
jjktkk
02-02-2011, 01:28 PM
This is almost as funny as the other spurs fan who shat all over Perkins considering he is better than any other spurs big outside of Duncan.
Not really saying a whole bunch there tbh. Perkins is a tough, physical, defender, but pretty limited offensively. I do like him as a player though.
LnGrrrR
02-02-2011, 03:01 PM
LOTS of Rondo butthurt on this forum.
redzero
02-02-2011, 03:03 PM
I'm trying to understand your reasoning, Culburn. Dwyane Wade carried his team to a championship, and you're not sure he's a winner. Rondo won a Championship as the fourth best player (i.e., a role player) on his team, but he's a winner?
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 03:16 PM
I'm trying to understand your reasoning, Culburn. Dwyane Wade carried his team to a championship, and you're not sure he's a winner. Rondo won a Championship as the fourth best player (i.e., a role player) on his team, but he's a winner?
I have no empiricals to bear out my reasoning twixt the two.
The '06 ring by Wade and Miami is a difficult one to stomach, but, I have to because it's my religion, so I don't & I won't qualify it, but, it does shade my judgment as to the worthyness of Wade. I need desperately to see Wade win another before I'll let him go in peace. I don't need that with Rondo. One was enough. His behavior in Game 7 when all was lost on that final three from the corner was astounding. Bryant there did not believe in Rondo and ran to Allen. It was a seminal moment.
Rondo will become lost in the game. Wade is still enamored watching it.
redzero
02-02-2011, 03:57 PM
So, let me get this straight: the fact that Rondo made one 3-pointer after Kobe left him is enough to declare Rondo a winner? You do know that Kobe left him because nobody on the Lakers respected his shot? You do know that the Lakers dared Rondo to hit jumpshots the entire series, and Rondo failed to make them pay, right?
So, you are saying that Rondo is a winner because he hits one 3-pointer? That's what makes him better than Paul and Williams?
Dwyane Wade carried his team to a championship--something Rondo has never done--but Rondo is a winner because he hit a 3-pointer when down five? Using that logic, isn't Derek Fisher even better? Fisher has made many big shots on on championship teams. Fisher has won five rings as a role player and Rondo has won one, so isn't Fisher the best point guard in the NBA?
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:01 PM
So, let me get this straight: the fact that Rondo made one 3-pointer after Kobe left him is enough to declare Rondo a winner? You do know that Kobe left him because nobody on the Lakers respected his shot? You do know that the Lakers dared Rondo to hit jumpshots the entire series, and Rondo failed to make them pay, right?
So, you are saying that Rondo is a winner because he hits one 3-pointer? That's what makes him better than Paul and Williams?
Dwyane Wade carried his team to a championship--something Rondo has never done--but Rondo is a winner because he hit a 3-pointer when down five? Using that logic, isn't Derek Fisher even better? Fisher has made many big shots on on championship teams. Fisher has won five rings as a role player and Rondo has won one, so isn't Fisher the best point guard in the NBA?
You're being purposefully unreasonable, Red. Why, I don't know. I try and have a candid conversation with you about this in a civilized manner and you put words in my mouth and insitutute Fish into the conversation.
That ain't right, Red.
redzero
02-02-2011, 04:11 PM
You're being purposefully unreasonable, Red. Why, I don't know. I try and have a candid conversation with you about this in a civilized manner and you put words in my mouth and insitutute Fish into the conversation.
That ain't right, Red.
I'm not putting words in your mouth. You have misunderstood my point. I am comparing Fisher and Rondo. I am, not you. I am comparing them so I can ask you a question.
That question is as follows:
If both Rondo and Fisher have hit big shots, and if Rondo and Fisher have won championships as role players, why--using the reasoning you have used in this thread--isn't Fisher the best point guard in the NBA?
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:13 PM
I pass, Red.
redzero
02-02-2011, 04:15 PM
I pass, Red.
Why? Is the question not fair?
jjktkk
02-02-2011, 04:15 PM
I'm not putting words in your mouth. You have misunderstood my point. I am comparing Fisher and Rondo. I am, not you. I am comparing them so I can ask you a question.
That question is as follows:
If both Rondo and Fisher have hit big shots, and if Rondo and Fisher have won championships as role players, why--using the reasoning you have used in this thread--isn't Fisher the best point guard in the NBA?
Shame on you red. Your denying Culby's trolling when your talking sense to him. :lol
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:18 PM
Shame on you red. Your denying Culby's trolling when your talking sense to him. :lol
jj, gettin' his ass smootcher on.
redzero
02-02-2011, 04:21 PM
I don't know why you won't answer my question. I haven't called you names or put words in you mouth; I'm trying to have civilized conversation, but you don't want one, apparently.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:21 PM
I don't know why you won't answer my question. I haven't called you names or put words in you mouth; I'm trying to have civilized conversation, but you don't want one, apparently.
I pass, Red.
bostonguy
02-02-2011, 04:25 PM
I pass, Red.
Hi
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:26 PM
Hi
I warn ya, I'm sittin' here bottomless.
bostonguy
02-02-2011, 04:28 PM
I warn ya, I'm sittin' here bottomless.
Why is that a warning? How is that a warning?
Texas_Ranger
02-02-2011, 04:30 PM
When he'll make some shots then he can be the best, right now I can shoot better than him.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:30 PM
When he'll make some shots then he can be the best, right now I can shoot better than him.
:rolleyes
bostonguy
02-02-2011, 04:32 PM
:rolleyes
:rolleyes
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:36 PM
:rolleyes
:rolleyes
Greg Oden
02-02-2011, 04:46 PM
LOTS of Rondo butthurt on this forum.
I don't get it. Spurfans are really mad about something obviousl like Rondo >> Parker.
bostonguy
02-02-2011, 04:49 PM
I don't get it. Spurfans are really mad about something obviousl like Rondo >> Parker.
Rondo isn't good. He is hype and nothing else. It is simply the system making him look good. It has nothing to do with talent. Put him in another system and he is a scrub.
jjktkk
02-02-2011, 04:51 PM
jj, gettin' his ass smootcher on.
If anyone can bob knob with fellow Laker fans..... :lol
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:52 PM
Rondo isn't good. He is hype and nothing else. It is simply the system making him look good. It has nothing to do with talent. Put him in another system and he is a scrub.
That's preposterous.
And you know it.
You're just looking a gift horse in the mouth & showing your ass.
Giuseppe
02-02-2011, 04:52 PM
If anyone can bob knob with fellow Laker fans..... :lol
You mean the moose knuckle?:lol
jjktkk
02-02-2011, 04:53 PM
I don't get it. Spurfans are really mad about something obviousl like Rondo >> Parker.
You normally don't get much tbh.
Greg Oden
02-02-2011, 05:02 PM
You normally don't get much tbh.
My #1 fan, still trying to get a piece of my scrotum.
Rondo >> Parker
jjktkk
02-02-2011, 05:09 PM
My #1 fan, still trying to get a piece of my scrotum.
Rondo >> Parker
I'll leave your fantasy's about other men to your BFF Tyson when you two have sleepovers. But back to basketball Rondo is better on the defensive end, while parker is better on offense. Pretty good pg debate imo.
Greg Oden
02-02-2011, 05:11 PM
if you worried about attending TAMUK for a few semesters but not graduating as much as you do about a couple of 7' black men, you might have actually graduated.
Rondo >> Parker
jjktkk
02-02-2011, 05:19 PM
if you worried about attending TAMUK for a few semesters but not graduating as much as you do about a couple of 7' black men, you might have actually graduated.
Rondo >> Parker
Worried about what? I'm just discussing basketball on here. Can you debate Rondo is better than Parker, or is this alittle too complex for yea? maybe Tyson can help you, hes pretty good at NBA2K11 from what I heard. :lol
Greg Oden
02-02-2011, 05:38 PM
Can you debate Rondo is better than Parker
That isn't much of a debate.
jjktkk
02-02-2011, 05:43 PM
That isn't much of a debate.
Very insightful, your improving. :toast
UnWantedTheory
02-02-2011, 05:45 PM
Rondo is a damn good PG. I think alot of it has to do with the team around him, but whatevs,as he is still very talented. Top 5-6 for sure. I use to think he wasn't even top 10 quality,but he certainly has proved me wrong. With that said, I would still take Cp3,D-Will,Rose,Westbrook or TP over him.
Brazil
02-02-2011, 06:02 PM
Rondo isn't good. He is hype and nothing else. It is simply the system making him look good. It has nothing to do with talent. Put him in another system and he is a scrub.
ppl said that about Amare too, he is a Steve Nash product, well apparently not
I'm pretty sure Rondo would be just fine on another team
Xylus
02-02-2011, 06:07 PM
Rondo is easily one of the best PG's in the game, and is the best Celtic on the court on many nights. I love his confidence, too. He has a quiet arrogance and he's very competitive.
cornbread
02-02-2011, 06:13 PM
I don't think Rondo is the best PG, but he's good enough and has won enough that I got no problem with him saying this out loud. If saying it makes him believe it and believing it makes him play better, more power to him.
Now I probably would get at least a little butthurt about it if Parker were anywhere close to being the best PG, but he's not so way-to-go Rondo.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 06:18 PM
I have no empiricals to bear out my reasoning twixt the two.
The '06 ring by Wade and Miami is a difficult one to stomach, but, I have to because it's my religion, so I don't & I won't qualify it, but, it does shade my judgment as to the worthyness of Wade. I need desperately to see Wade win another before I'll let him go in peace. I don't need that with Rondo. One was enough. His behavior in Game 7 when all was lost on that final three from the corner was astounding. Bryant there did not believe in Rondo and ran to Allen. It was a seminal moment.
Rondo will become lost in the game. Wade is still enamored watching it.
This post is retarded.
It's OK, once you commit to an argument you can back up and rephrase or admit a part of it was incorrect. Wade took an older, much less able Shaq and won it all. Shaq anchored the Lakers to the rings. If Wade ain't a winner, Kobe isn't either. Clearly neither is true.
For essentially entire career, Wade's team has been GARBAGE.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 06:20 PM
You're being purposefully unreasonable, Red. Why, I don't know. I try and have a candid conversation with you about this in a civilized manner and you put words in my mouth and insitutute Fish into the conversation.
That ain't right, Red.
lolol, using bullshit to cover up his own retarded ass bullshitting
you clearly know jack shit
Bukefal
02-02-2011, 06:42 PM
Ah the "put him on another team" card being used here. Yes Rondo has flaws. Yes he isn't the best pg in the league. I bet Rondo would be successful anywhere else. The guy isn't a scrub and he isn't "all hype". He is a damn good pg. It helps that he doesn't have as much pressure, but the guy is talented. I can't believe you are denying that. :lmao:lmao
This is almost as funny as the other spurs fan who shat all over Perkins considering he is better than any other spurs big outside of Duncan.
I did not say he wasn't talented. He is and he is a good pg for Boston. He just isn't the best pg in the NBA, that's ridiculous and I think Paul, Rose, Williams, Westbrook and TP are better than him. And yes, I think he is hyped, because of his assists. If you would put another pg in his position they too would have such stats.
21_Blessings
02-02-2011, 06:49 PM
think Paul, Rose, Williams, Westbrook
:tu
and TP are better than him.
:td
Kyle Orton
02-02-2011, 06:54 PM
Does anyone rememba det one time when bukkakefail said Parker was a top 10 player in the NBA right after his fluke 2009 season :lmao
Tp9gospursgo
02-02-2011, 07:26 PM
He can't shoot. So, no. Top 5 maybe. Not the best.
mindcrime
02-02-2011, 07:53 PM
I did not say he wasn't talented. He is and he is a good pg for Boston. He just isn't the best pg in the NBA, that's ridiculous and I think Paul, Rose, Williams, Westbrook and TP are better than him. And yes, I think he is hyped, because of his assists. If you would put another pg in his position they too would have such stats.
Why would any player not say they're the best at their position and give a possible foe the edge? How quickly people forget that Parker had a horrible outside shot as well until he improved on it. Rondo may do the same.
ALVAREZ6
02-02-2011, 08:01 PM
Why would any player not say they're the best at their position and give a possible foe the edge? How quickly people forget that Parker had a horrible outside shot as well until he improved on it. Rondo may do the same.
Give them an edge? what edge, a competitive playing advantage/edge, or are you saying it would be bad to give a verbal compliment/respect/consideration to an opponent?
It's not like every question has to be black or white...obviously he could say things like, it's close, it's tough to say, there's a lot of great PGs in the league, I think I'm one of the best but really there's a lot of us that are great...anything like this is also a possibility.
Rondo: I'm the best.
No you are not, and it's funny that you pretend that you are.
Greg Oden
02-02-2011, 08:11 PM
Does anyone rememba det one time when bukkakefail said Parker was a top 10 player in the NBA right after his fluke 2009 season :lmao
det was funny scrah.
lol bukefail
lol macadonia
GoodOdor
02-02-2011, 08:17 PM
Does anyone rememba det one time when bukkakefail said Parker was a top 10 player in the NBA right after his fluke 2009 season :lmao
Tbh isn't he the guy who runs the parker facebook thread?
gay for parker, tbh.
Bukefal
02-02-2011, 08:42 PM
I wasn't talking about his current performances in that time. Some on here were all just very fast to bash everything parker or spurs like always. In this thread too.
But hey, don't anyone dare to say or mention something positive about Parker on here (on a freakin Spurs forum), that person should be ashamed. Parker should be hated. He is worth nothing.
Bukefal
02-02-2011, 08:43 PM
It's not like every question has to be black or white...obviously he could say things like, it's close, it's tough to say, there's a lot of great PGs in the league, I think I'm one of the best but really there's a lot of us that are great...anything like this is also a possibility.
Rondo: I'm the best.
No you are not, and it's funny that you pretend that you are.
This.
Rondo can say what he wants. He just isn't.
Bukefal
02-02-2011, 08:43 PM
det was funny scrah.
lol bukefail
lol macadonia
ok :lol
Greg Oden
02-02-2011, 08:56 PM
:cryI wasn't talking about his current performances in that time. Some on here were all just very fast to bash everything parker or spurs like always. In this thread too.
But hey, don't anyone dare to say or mention something positive about Parker on here (on a freakin Spurs forum), that person should be ashamed. Parker should be hated. He is worth nothing. :cry
dallaskd
02-03-2011, 01:04 AM
he is 3rd in the NBA among point guards in FG% only behind Nash and Parker..
(this for those saying he cant shoot)
LnGrrrR
02-03-2011, 01:08 AM
he is 3rd in the NBA among point guards in FG% only behind Nash and Parker..
(this for those saying he cant shoot)
LIES! He can't shoot! :(
Seriously though, if he doesn't develop a solid mid-range jumper before he loses his burst/speed/athleticism, then I'll worry.
ALVAREZ6
02-03-2011, 01:09 AM
he is 3rd in the NBA among point guards in FG% only behind Nash and Parker..
(this for those saying he cant shoot)
that's because he doesn't shoot jumpers because he knows he can't.
he gets steals and makes layups, or just makes layups.
nice try faggot, Nash maintains a high ass FG% while being much older and less athletic, shooting jumpers, 3s, anything.
dallaskd
02-03-2011, 01:11 AM
Since when do point guards need to shoot jumpers?
LnGrrrR
02-03-2011, 01:15 AM
Since when do point guards need to shoot jumpers?
Well, if Rondo had solid jumper, it would keep defenses honest.
Although defenders laying off of him this year seems to give him great passing lanes, hence the higher assist numbers.
Teams will probably give him room in the playoffs this year. He'll have to make them pay either with a jumper or great passes. We will see.
dallaskd
02-03-2011, 01:18 AM
Mark jackson was considered the best PG in the league for some time and couldnt shoot worth shit. was a pure passer his whole career..
dallaskd
02-03-2011, 01:19 AM
Unless he gets stuck on a shitty team. i.e Devin Harris, then Rondo will be fine
dirk4mvp
02-03-2011, 01:20 AM
Kidd used to dominate games while shooting in the low 40s or even high 30s from the field. I don't get why spurfans of all people are giving a PG shit for not being able to shoot. It was barely a few years ago when Parker gained a halfway decent shot. And he's not even close to being the passer and defender Rondo is.
HarlemHeat37
02-03-2011, 01:27 AM
Mark jackson was considered the best PG in the league for some time and couldnt shoot worth shit. was a pure passer his whole career..
:lmao
ALVAREZ6
02-03-2011, 01:37 AM
Kidd used to dominate games while shooting in the low 40s or even high 30s from the field. I don't get why spurfans of all people are giving a PG shit for not being able to shoot. It was barely a few years ago when Parker gained a halfway decent shot. And he's not even close to being the passer and defender Rondo is.
1. I'm giving Rondo shit in this thread's context. So, in comparison to the D-wills, the CP3s, the Roses, etc. I know he's a great player, I never said he was not. I just have a problem with him stating he's the best PG, implicitly saying CP3 and D-Will are both inferior, when they clearly are not.
2. Rondo dominates games currently, quite frankly..with the help of all of his buddies to pass to..Shaq, KG, Pierce, Allen..they're all on court with him at any given time, the defense isn't overwhelmed or anything. Kidding aside, Rondo can dominate games. It's just different than when D-Will drops 39 points on 16-24 shooting while recording 9 assists.
3. You're right, Parker did not have a consistent jumper earlier in his career. I will add to this and say I agree he is not close to being the passer and defender Rondo is. I don't think TP is a better PG, I've never claimed such a thing or ever put TP in my top 5 PGs in that thread. This is one of Tony's best assisting seasons and probably best, but he's never been an amazing ball distributer in his career. He's a small, quick as hell 1 without the vision the elite passers have.
1. I'm giving Rondo shit in this thread's context. So, in comparison to the D-wills, the CP3s, the Roses, etc. I know he's a great player, I never said he was not. I just have a problem with him stating he's the best PG, implicitly saying CP3 and D-Will are both inferior, when they clearly are not.
2. Rondo dominates games currently, quite frankly..with the help of all of his buddies to pass to..Shaq, KG, Pierce, Allen..they're all on court with him at any given time, the defense isn't overwhelmed or anything. Kidding aside, Rondo can dominate games. It's just different than when D-Will drops 39 points on 16-24 shooting while recording 9 assists.
3. You're right, Parker did not have a consistent jumper earlier in his career. I will add to this and say I agree he is not close to being the passer and defender Rondo is. I don't think TP is a better PG, I've never claimed such a thing or ever put TP in my top 5 PGs in that thread. This is one of Tony's best assisting seasons and probably best, but he's never been an amazing ball distributer in his career. He's a small, quick as hell 1 without the vision the elite passers have.
Solid post, hammered all the points I would've hammered.
Dave Mustaine
02-03-2011, 01:55 AM
yeah because Alavarez's post there could've been dumbed down to "Nothing but a peace of shit bona fide scrub." :tu
ALVAREZ6
02-03-2011, 01:56 AM
?
jjktkk
02-03-2011, 01:58 AM
Mark jackson was considered the best PG in the league for some time and couldnt shoot worth shit. was a pure passer his whole career..
What league was this? The Big East?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.