View Full Version : Official apologize to Tony Parker thread
:)
Yea, he started off slow, but he saved us in the 3rd quarter. He's a frustrating kid, but he's stepping up now. Let's go Spurs!
samikeyp
06-01-2005, 10:54 PM
I love Tony but he has yet to be a "dollar player"
Good for 4 quarters. :)
MaNuMaNiAc
06-01-2005, 10:54 PM
Waiting for AHF to show his face!
Aggie Hoopsfan
06-01-2005, 10:56 PM
Tony gets his props in two weeks. Way to rebound tonight after an abysmal first half though kid.
1Parker1
06-01-2005, 10:56 PM
:)
Yea, he started off slow, but he saved us in the 3rd quarter. He's a frustrating kid, but he's stepping up now. Let's go Spurs!
You'll get 0 apologies, and about 20 excuses pointing out the bad parts--such as his sucky start, without giving him props for the good parts.
WalterBenitez
06-01-2005, 10:58 PM
apologize? no, I think he deserve better than this, congrats ...
smeagol
06-01-2005, 10:58 PM
TP needs to step it up if we are to win it all. He had a great 3Q, but 8-21 and only two assists is not enough.
Manu didn't have a great game either.
TD was Da Man of Da nite!
Slo spurs fan
06-01-2005, 10:59 PM
Beno showed him how to make btb threes!
:spin
Sense
06-01-2005, 10:59 PM
:)
Yea, he started off slow, but he saved us in the 3rd quarter. He's a frustrating kid, but he's stepping up now. Let's go Spurs!
I want my props for knowing what pop was doing and knowing that parker would step up...
AHF... :rolleyes
T Park
06-01-2005, 11:00 PM
TP needs to step it up if we are to win it all. He had a great 3Q, but 8-21 and only two assists is not enough.
Manu didn't have a great game either.
TD was Da Man of Da nite!
how many points did Parker have???
Thanks good night.
The haters will always hate.
JUUOT
06-01-2005, 11:01 PM
he finally made them pay for leaving him open
he was not extraordinary but he get out of his funck alone. he steped up contrary to previous year. he is trully getting better. and hudrih is finall showing since two games. that is solid man solid!
smeagol
06-01-2005, 11:08 PM
how many points did Parker have???
Thanks good night.
The haters will always hate.
I'm not hating, you fucking asshole.
IMO he did not have a great game. I gave him props for the 3Q, where he played the lights out. But only 2 assists? You think that is good for a PG? There were many plays were he has dribbling the ball for way too much time and he made poor plays. If we would have lost, people would be blaming him.
You are pointing out how many points he scored. 18 pts on 21 shots. That's not good either.
Manu had one more point than TP and he still had a mediocre game, IMO (as I pointed out in my previous post).
You are such and idiot.
smeagol
06-01-2005, 11:10 PM
he finally made them pay for leaving him open
he was not extraordinary but he get out of his funck alone. he steped up contrary to previous year. he is trully getting better. and hudrih is finall showing since two games. that is solid man solid!
Agreed. I give him huge props for that. His first half was horrible, shooting poorly from the perimiter. But the guy has cojones! He continued shooting and made crucial shots in the 3rd. Q.
Tek_XX
06-01-2005, 11:20 PM
These apoligize threads are so retarded. Why should anyone apoligize for critizing a player when said player is playing like utter crap? I think Tony Parker is excellent when he's on and making smart moves. But this doesn't make me want to retroactively apoligize for critizing him for disappearing.
These apoligize threads are so retarded. Why should anyone apoligize for critizing a player when said player is playing like utter crap? I think Tony Parker is excellent when he's on and making smart moves. But this doesn't make me want to retroactively apoligize for critizing him for disappearing.
Damn dude, calm down. This thread was made in jest. :rolleyes I never said you couldn't criticize a guy for playing like crap because I was cussing him out in the 1st half for stinking up the place but we lose this game without his play in the 3rd and decisive quarter when we surged to take the lead. We won, we advanced to the finals, and he deserves props. He's still inconsistent but you can tell he's steadily improving.
weebo
06-01-2005, 11:46 PM
If parker ever develops a jumpshot, the Spurs will be next to unbeatable. For a short stretch, Parker was actually the Suns best player--the way he was clanking shots left and right.
Solid D
06-01-2005, 11:57 PM
The 8 straight points Tony made in 50 seconds in the third were huge.
This was far from Tony's best game but he hung in there. He made some bad decisions with the ball in the 4th that helped the Suns to get within 3 points. Pop put the ball in Manu's hands to enter the offense the last 4-5 minutes (thank you Pop). That seemed to settle the Spurs and then Tony was able to focus on bothering Nash and running and cutting. He even managed to get open on the screen/roll missed switch for the easy lay-in.
beirmeistr
06-01-2005, 11:58 PM
I feel bad for stating that Parker was playing like a retard in the first half. he made up for it in the third. But what's still disturbing is that he is not playing as smart as he should. Perhaps the brilliance of nash just accentuates Parker's shortcomings. I just hope he can play better because Billups is next.
jcrod
06-02-2005, 12:38 AM
I'm not hating, you fucking asshole.
IMO he did not have a great game. I gave him props for the 3Q, where he played the lights out. But only 2 assists? You think that is good for a PG? There were many plays were he has dribbling the ball for way too much time and he made poor plays. If we would have lost, people would be blaming him.
You are pointing out how many points he scored. 18 pts on 21 shots. That's not good either.
Manu had one more point than TP and he still had a mediocre game, IMO (as I pointed out in my previous post).
You are such and idiot.
Why do people always harp on the assists. This system is not made for a PG or any one player to have huge assist numbers. So get over the assist numbers. He was huge defense wise on Nash tonight.
nacho estrada
06-02-2005, 12:49 AM
When Tony gets going its scary for our oppenents because you know Manu and Tim do other things to get in the game and are even more consistent(at this point) than Tony. Think to Games 1 and 2 where Tony shot the best % of our Triumphant 3.
cqsallie
06-02-2005, 01:06 AM
Somebody said that the measure of a PG was the number of assists per game. But who? Are assists more important than points? Maybe it's time to stop playing by the rules of sportscasters, who are - sad to say - only hangers on. They do their best to out-talk their fellow sportcasters. They dredge up silly and unimportant pieces of information in the middle of a game to show each other how much they know.
But, who's playing the game? They're not!
I'm not hating, you fucking asshole.
IMO he did not have a great game. I gave him props for the 3Q, where he played the lights out. But only 2 assists? You think that is good for a PG? There were many plays were he has dribbling the ball for way too much time and he made poor plays. If we would have lost, people would be blaming him.
You are pointing out how many points he scored. 18 pts on 21 shots. That's not good either.
Manu had one more point than TP and he still had a mediocre game, IMO (as I pointed out in my previous post).
You are such and idiot.
Tony is not a pure point guard ala Stockton, Nash, etc so I don't think you can measure his effectiveness based on assists. He's a scoring point guard which has already been acknowledged by Pop. His career average in assists is what, 5-6 per game? Yea, I agree it wasn't his best game but when we had to win just 1 more to get to the finals, it was good enough. :)
slayermin
06-02-2005, 01:26 AM
Hey, it isn't over yet.
We still need to win a championship. Eat your Wheaties and get ready for Billups or Jones.
milkyway21
06-02-2005, 01:44 AM
i love Tony playing alongside Tim Duncan. the Jeff & Mutt.
but please...........
play some consistent game, Kid! Not just after halftime Pops' chit chat in the locker room.
And you'll go places. Believe me.
anyway, thank you for that back-to-back 3 pointers in the 3rd. We got the W.
Solid D
06-02-2005, 02:19 AM
The Spurs run several Motion offensive sets, including some Flex. These sets are not really PG-centric. Another reason why TP won't have high assist numbers is that if more than one dribble is used to score, the pass prior to the multiple dribbles no longer is an assist (except in rare cases). Feeding Tim in the post and letting him dribble and use his footwork doesn't lend itself to an assist on the entry pass. It more than likely creates an assist for Tim or a perimeter player out of that post move, as the ball is cycled to the open man.
The Spurs had the best assist +/- differential in the league, defensively limiting the other team's assists (15 or 16), while putting up 22-23 assists per game themselves.
The Spurs share the ball and are the best passing Spurs team to date.
smeagol
06-02-2005, 05:46 AM
So it looks like I agree with most of the people posting on this thread. TP had a so-so game, but shot huge buckets in the 3rd Q and played good D in the 4th.
I've said numerous times I like TP and his game.
But somehow, I'm the hater.
Go figure.
Rick Von Braun
06-02-2005, 06:00 AM
No matter how you slice it, this was not a good game for TP. No hate, just the honest truth.
SouthernFried
06-02-2005, 06:31 AM
Tony was not good tonite.
His 8 points in about 2 minutes in the third were huge for our run...but, playing 2 good minutes in a game is not gonna cut it for a starting PG in this league. I've given Tony as much slack as anyone...but I'm running out of patience with the guy. I keep thinking he's "improving," but I'm not sure he is. He's been completely consistent...in his inconsistency.
If he doesn't play better and more consistent in the Finals...we will lose.
If he disapears in these next games as well, Pop's gonna have to make some hard decisions.
ladiesman
06-02-2005, 07:27 AM
His dissapearence act is getting old... Heck, Amare has a better jumper than TP... :rolleyes
OM_fever
06-02-2005, 08:01 AM
The only problem on TP is his lack of consistency with his jump shot. If it hits 40%, it would force defense to play closer to him and with his foot speed, he would have plenty open space after having beaten his opponent or forcing someone to leave another space for a pass to an open man.
I don't see that problem being fixed till this summer, hope start next season would see this change in his game applied. But don't judge someone only on his stats, if Spurs played a high tempo style, he would have 8 assits per game... (hope so).
xapatan2
06-02-2005, 08:48 AM
Yo !
I am beginning to become really sick with all those threads about TP lack of this and lack of that...
He played this serie and what is the concret result at the end ? the mvp has no impact and was no way decisive...
Parker is already among THE THREE BEST POINT GUARD IN THE LEAGUE ON DEFENSE, and you are not happy ?
Happily he has still to improve, but he has shown every year major improvement in his game... and he's still so FUCKING YOUNG !
Question is, is he ready or not to match Billups ( if Pistons pass) intensity in terms of mental presence ??? I do not know the answer... He has the talent for it, the maturity ?
But if he is matching Billups game, he'll be on the top of playoff's point guard... at 23 !
X
ladiesman
06-02-2005, 08:57 AM
he'll go off in the first 2 games, then, they will start going underneath on the pic'n'roll, and that is where the problem starts....
wildbill2u
06-02-2005, 09:26 AM
:)
Yea, he started off slow, but he saved us in the 3rd quarter. He's a frustrating kid, but he's stepping up now. Let's go Spurs!
I'd like Tony to watch some film of Nash. If he could learn to go in the lane and simply not pick up his dribble or back out, he could be awesome. How many times did Nash simply start in and when blocked by the bigs, slowly dribble around until an opening appeared for him to shoot or pass off to a big man under the basket. He just won't give up control of the ball until he absolutely has to.
jcrod
06-02-2005, 09:38 AM
He held Nash to 9-20 and under 20 pts, I call that a great game on its own.
Again folks this system is not made for the PG to have huge assists numbers, get use to it. He did have an off shooting night, but that will come with practice and time, heck Jordon didn't have a reliable jumper till later in his career.
mcshine
06-02-2005, 09:38 AM
Yo !
I am beginning to become really sick with all those threads about TP lack of this and lack of that...
He played this serie and what is the concret result at the end ? the mvp has no impact and was no way decisive...
Parker is already among THE THREE BEST POINT GUARD IN THE LEAGUE ON DEFENSE, and you are not happy ?
Happily he has still to improve, but he has shown every year major improvement in his game... and he's still so FUCKING YOUNG !
Question is, is he ready or not to match Billups ( if Pistons pass) intensity in terms of mental presence ??? I do not know the answer... He has the talent for it, the maturity ?
But if he is matching Billups game, he'll be on the top of playoff's point guard... at 23 !
X
xapatan2,
Don't get so worked up, people are always gonna critisizing asking- "What have you done for me lately?" I'me the biggest Tony fan but, I think he was a little overhyped at the end of the season. Overall he still has to work on his consistency over a series. He still gets outplayed at times by other point guards inferior to him. At the end of this series, Phoenix was leaving him so wide open, but give him credit, cuz he hit those 2 big threes in the third.
I will give the edge to Billups in a head to head matchup against Tony.
But you're right, he's only 23 and is only gonna get better.
SouthernFried
06-02-2005, 09:50 AM
I've given Tony slack for a few yrs now...I'm not seeing improvement. He's as inconsistent as he ever was...and the guy plays soft, especially if someone is playing him physical.
I watched him a lot last nite...and he was playing scared.
Afraid to shoot, and not doing much to help anyone else on the team. He dribbled to the top of the key and just passed it off, then just ran around avoiding any contact. Not setting any picks when he didn't have the ball, and not moving around trying to get himself open. He simply didn't want the ball, and he wasn't doing much to get others the ball in good shooting position...3 assists from your point, who isn't producing on the offensive end simply sucks.
Yes, I know...he had a 2 minute streak where he made a quick 8 points that was key to our 3rd quarter run. That was great.
But, 2 or 3 good minutes from a starting point guard on a championship team aint gonna do it. And it's not like this is a new thing for him.
If TP doesn't show he's capable of truely turning it up and showing he's a championship caliber PG in the FINALS...I'd get rid of him next year. He's is by far the weakest link on this team right now.
The FINALS will show what TP is made of. I'm rooting for him regardless of how down on him I sound. I don't wanna go PG shopping, and I like him and he fits into our chemistry great.
So, suck it up Tony. Prove something to me and your critics. Fold one more time...and I'll be leading the dump him bandwagon.
Pressure? Yeah. Welcome to the NBA.
ducks
06-02-2005, 09:52 AM
you must be on crack
the center is the weakest postion on the court
heck the spurs starter for the regualar season is seeing no time in playoffs
SouthernFried
06-02-2005, 09:57 AM
Without production from Tony...either assists or shooting...we will lose in the FINALS. We don't expect huge numbers from the Center position, and Nazr is doing everything and more than we expected from that position.
Our team is structured to expect and demand more from our PG position. If Nazr doesn't get high scoring numbers we still expect to win. If Tony doesn't get high numbers in either points or assists...we will lose.
On our team, with how we are structured to win games...right now, TONY is our weak link.
Mebbe we can structure it next year to not expect so much outta the Point, and focus on Nazr or someone else. Not sure how that makes Tony's case any better tho.
2centsworth
06-02-2005, 10:16 AM
On our team, with how we are structured to win games...right now, TONY is our weak link.
get a clue. Tony has been the strength. He totally controls the tempo and puts a ton of pressure on the opposing teams. That in itself is huge for the spurs, but not to mention Tony has come up huge at critical moments of games. His first three years he was plagued with disappearing in key games, now he fights through his inconsistency and still contributes in a very large way. BTW, he avg over 21 pts a game against the Suns and the SUns totally changed their defensive philosophy to stop TONY. Why does a team change their style to stop the other teams weakness. Boy you're dumb.
spurster
06-02-2005, 10:20 AM
Tony had a good game, or a "good enough" game, however you want to look at it. His offense was probably affected by the amount of defensive effort that he put in.
I don't expect TP to have Nash-like assist numbers, but the low number of assists indicate that TP is not passing well when he penetrates and the lane closes up. All too often, he will stop in the middle of the lane and not be able to get rid of the ball right away.
TwoHandJam
06-02-2005, 10:23 AM
I've given Tony slack for a few yrs now...I'm not seeing improvement. He's as inconsistent as he ever was...and the guy plays soft, especially if someone is playing him physical.
I watched him a lot last nite...and he was playing scared.
Afraid to shoot, and not doing much to help anyone else on the team. He dribbled to the top of the key and just passed it off, then just ran around avoiding any contact. Not setting any picks when he didn't have the ball, and not moving around trying to get himself open. He simply didn't want the ball, and he wasn't doing much to get others the ball in good shooting position...3 assists from your point, who isn't producing on the offensive end simply sucks.
Yes, I know...he had a 2 minute streak where he made a quick 8 points that was key to our 3rd quarter run. That was great.
But, 2 or 3 good minutes from a starting point guard on a championship team aint gonna do it. And it's not like this is a new thing for him.
If TP doesn't show he's capable of truely turning it up and showing he's a championship caliber PG in the FINALS...I'd get rid of him next year. He's is by far the weakest link on this team right now.
The FINALS will show what TP is made of. I'm rooting for him regardless of how down on him I sound. I don't wanna go PG shopping, and I like him and he fits into our chemistry great.
So, suck it up Tony. Prove something to me and your critics. Fold one more time...and I'll be leading the dump him bandwagon.
Pressure? Yeah. Welcome to the NBA.I agree with much of what you say here but I think it's a little harsh to say TP is our "weakest link". I also thought Parker had turned the corner this year in terms of consistency but his up and down play in the playoffs has me disappointed. Again.
To be fair, he has improved his defense tremendously this year and that is helping him stay effective on the court when he isn't playing well but his major problem is still his lack of a consistent outside shot.
I know he worked on his shot this year and his mechanics actually looked better at the start of the season but somewhere along the line he's regressed back to his old "flick of the wrist" form. He almost has a weird side-spin on his shots if you look closely.
I realize he's still young but this is his fourth year in the league and I'm starting to get worried about him ever having a consistent jumper. This would be so key to his game it isn't even funny. If defenders were forced to honor his outside shot then he could use his speed to blow by them at will. He would be virtually unguardable and the Spurs as a team would be virtually unbeatable.
Even after all the roster changes the Spurs' success still seems very tightly linked to Parker's game. When he plays well, we almost always win but when he stinks it up, we tend to lose more often than not.
SouthernFried
06-02-2005, 10:24 AM
Yes, I agree...the SUNS did change their defensive style against TONY. They decided to leave him wide open cause he couldn't produce from the outside, and pack the lanes.
And TONY was scared to take those shots. When he did, he missed them, except for that 2 minute stretch in the 3rd quarter.
However, we still won. But it's more in spite of Tony's poor perfomance than because of any good one.
I want him to do well as much as anyone...this FINALS series will tell me a lot.
TwoHandJam
06-02-2005, 10:34 AM
Yes, I agree...the SUNS did change their defensive style against TONY. They decided to leave him wide open cause he couldn't produce from the outside, and pack the lanes.
And TONY was scared to take those shots. When he did, he missed them, except for that 2 minute stretch in the 3rd quarter.
However, we still won. But it's more in spite of Tony's poor perfomance than because of any good one.
I want him to do well as much as anyone...this FINALS series will tell me a lot.I share your concern, especially against Billups. I'm on the record as saying that Tony's matchup with Billups should prove the largest factor in determining the outcome of a series against Detroit. If he disappears for a couple of games then we'll most likely lose the finals. If that happens then Tony's deficiencies will really be front-and-center in everyone's minds.
Detroit will certainly pack the lane to take away Tony and Manu's penetration and force them to beat us from the outside. Manu can make them pay from three or almost always get fouled on a drive but can Tony?
Tony has already had to be rescued once from a disappearing act in the finals against Kidd after starting strong. He needs to prove this year that he can deliver for the entire series or there are going to be some tough questions to answer this summer.
Tony should really take advantage of having the Big Dog on the team. Steve Smith once helped him with his jumper and it seemed to make a difference. The Dog has one of the smoothest jumpshots in the league. Maybe TP could ask him for a few pointers during this time off.
2centsworth
06-02-2005, 10:45 AM
Yes, I agree...the SUNS did change their defensive style against TONY. They decided to leave him wide open cause he couldn't produce from the outside, and pack the lanes.
And TONY was scared to take those shots. When he did, he missed them, except for that 2 minute stretch in the 3rd quarter.
However, we still won. But it's more in spite of Tony's poor perfomance than because of any good one.
I want him to do well as much as anyone...this FINALS series will tell me a lot.
First you say Tony is the weakest link, and then you say a Team like Phoenix adjust their entire defensive strategy to stop him. Pretty high praise for the weakest link. His jumpshot is his weakest area, no doubt, but the kid is so good that he still figured out a way to have a huge impact on the game with his JUMPER. GET A CLUE>
OM_fever
06-02-2005, 11:05 AM
Tony is definitly a huge player. OK he doesn't yet have that level of consistency that everybody expects. But first he is young, how long he has been in this league doesn't change that fact. He has progressed in a lot of area (defense, distribution...) and even if he needs a better jump shot he is still a really good player. How many teams would be glad to have such an "inconstancy" player? I see plenty of them!
When times come for him to carry the team, he tries to do it and a lot of time succeed to. It's true that he is reluctant to take some open shots, but would you prefer him to take them and lost them.
And if the rest of the team has a good production, they force the opponent defense to pay attention to everybody and create more opportunity to penetrate. When Horry & Barry has good production, it permits to Tony to have more freedom so don't point tony performance without taking into account performance from our 3 point shooters.
I would love Tony to get a more consistent jump shot, but don't complain to much, compare with other point guard, which one with the same salary and room would you like to have in exchange for him? please give names...
Lady M
06-02-2005, 11:12 AM
Tony stats
REBOUNDS PER GAME
YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
01-02 SAS 77 72 29.4 .419 .323 .675 .40 2.10 2.60 4.3 1.16 .09 1.96 2.20 9.2
02-03 SAS 82 82 33.8 .464 .337 .755 .40 2.20 2.60 5.3 .87 .05 2.41 2.10 15.5
03-04 SAS 75 75 34.4 .447 .312 .702 .60 2.60 3.20 5.5 .81 .09 2.39 2.00 14.7
04-05 SAS 80 80 34.2 .482 .276 .650 .60 3.10 3.70 6.1 1.23 .05 2.69 2.10 16.6
Career 314 309 33.0 .458 .315 .697 .50 2.50 3.00 5.3 1.02 .00 2.37 2.10 14.0
Playoff 60 60 35.5 .430 .306 .697 .50 2.30 2.80 4.5 .98 .10 2.48 2.20 16.5
Nash after four years (age: 26 after 4 years)
YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
96-97 PHO 65 2 10.5 .423 .418 .824 .20 .70 1.00 2.1 .31 .00 .97 1.40 3.3
97-98 PHO 76 9 21.9 .459 .415 .860 .40 1.70 2.10 3.4 .83 .05 1.29 1.90 9.1
98-99 DAL 40 40 31.7 .363 .374 .826 .80 2.10 2.90 5.5 .93 .05 2.08 2.50 7.9
99-00 DAL 56 27 27.4 .477 .403 .882 .60 1.60 2.20 4.9 .66 .05 1.82 2.20 8.6
kidd (age: 25 after 4 years)
REBOUNDS PER GAME
YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
94-95 DAL 79 79 33.8 .385 .272 .698 1.90 3.50 5.40 7.7 1.91 .30 3.16 1.80 11.7
95-96 DAL 81 81 37.5 .381 .336 .692 2.50 4.30 6.80 9.7 2.16 .32 4.05 1.90 16.6
96-97 DAL 22 22 36.0 .369 .323 .667 1.40 2.70 4.10 9.1 2.05 .36 3.00 1.90 9.9
96-97 PHO 33 23 35.5 .423 .400 .688 1.00 3.80 4.80 9.0 2.39 .36 2.30 2.20 11.6
96-97 -- 55 45 35.7 .403 .370 .679 1.20 3.40 4.50 9.0 2.25 .36 2.58 2.10 10.9
97-98 PHO 82 82 38.0 .416 .313 .799 1.30 4.90 6.20 9.1 1.98 .32 3.18 1.70 11.6
it's clear TP can't improve Nash and kidd have proved they are the best of the league after 4 years
it's irony of course :depressed
2centsworth
06-02-2005, 11:14 AM
Tony is definitly a huge player. OK he doesn't yet have that level of consistency that everybody expects. But first he is young, how long he has been in this league doesn't change that fact. He has progressed in a lot of area (defense, distribution...) and even if he needs a better jump shot he is still a really good player. How many teams would be glad to have such an "inconstancy" player? I see plenty of them!
When times come for him to carry the team, he tries to do it and a lot of time succeed to. It's true that he is reluctant to take some open shots, but would you prefer him to take them and lost them.
And if the rest of the team has a good production, they force the opponent defense to pay attention to everybody and create more opportunity to penetrate. When Horry & Barry has good production, it permits to Tony to have more freedom so don't point tony performance without taking into account performance from our 3 point shooters.
I would love Tony to get a more consistent jump shot, but don't complain to much, compare with other point guard, which one with the same salary and room would you like to have in exchange for him? please give names...
exactly. Plus, for someone who has such a terrible jumpshot he sure figured a way to make the Suns pay for leaving him open. I bet they wish they would of had a least a hand in his face.
johnny00
06-02-2005, 02:16 PM
Afraid to shoot, and not doing much to help anyone else on the team. He dribbled to the top of the key and just passed it off, then just ran around avoiding any contact. Not setting any picks when he didn't have the ball, and not moving around trying to get himself open. He simply didn't want the ball, and he wasn't doing much to get others the ball in good shooting position...3 assists from your point, who isn't producing on the offensive end simply sucks.
Yes, I know...he had a 2 minute streak where he made a quick 8 points that was key to our 3rd quarter run. That was great.
But, 2 or 3 good minutes from a starting point guard on a championship team aint gonna do it. And it's not like this is a new thing for him.
Liked these parts of you observations I saw the same things you did last night.
While not the weakest link on this team Tony Parker has got to be one of the most frustrating players to watch when game time starts. Shooting jump shots that aren't hitting until the first half and bad decisions and turnovers by him in the 4th nearly cost us the game. I don't understand how a guy who has so much potential can make so many boneheaded plays.
But he's still young.
Lame excuse. This guy has more playoff experience than probably half of the league, he's gone through these pressure situations already, he should have fuckin' icewater flowing in his veins but what do we get? Fetal Position Parker, scared to run the team, scared to have the ball in his hands, scared to be on the floor.
Disappointing.
Don't get me wrong despite what I said I want him to do well for the team because it's the team I've rooted for for many years. He plays great when he plays with confidence you can see it when he's out there on the floor, but as soon as there is some doubt about his ability to preform or his confidence waivers in any way everything seems to go right out the window.
I hope Tony has a helluva series in the finals this year, I hope he proves me and all the naysayers wrong, Hell, I'd love it I'll even lead the public apologies, because this year Speedy Claxton isn't here to save his ass again.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.