I Know, I know

[xrayzebra]

Okay, I know these have more than likely been posted
before, but I think all you liberals and Dem-o-Craps need
to be reminded. So There!!!!!

==============================================

Subject: FW: Inspector Clouseau at your service-Ve Vill find zese wepons of mass instruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten time since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"[WE] urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." > - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime . He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

SO NOW EVERY ONE OF THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED -- THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR UNNECESSARILY!



==============================================

Have a nice day.

:elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant

[Nbadan]

SO NOW EVERY ONE OF THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED -- THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR UNNECESSARILY!

No one is saying that the administration lied about the possibility that Saddam may have once possessed WMD. The administration manipulated intelligence to support claims that Saddams weapon program were still active and a 'clear and immediate' threat to the U.S. and our interests. One could see how democrats who received biased intelligence from the C.I.A., could be manipulated into believing that Saddam still possessed these weapons.

Despite the urging of P.N.A.C., Clinton never invaded Iraq based solely on intelligence that could not be supported by first-hand credible sources.

[Hook Dem]

" Clinton never invaded Iraq based solely on intelligence that could not be supported by first-hand credible sources." ..................You are exactly right Dan!........He was too busy getting a blow job!:rollin

[ChumpDumper]

Bad intel is bad intel.

[Samurai Jane]

The problem with bad intel is that you don't find out it's bad until after the fact. So, IMO, the question becomes, do you err on the side of caution or do you gamble that it is bad intel, possibly at the expense of the safety of your people?

[Nbadan]

So, IMO, the question becomes, do you err on the side of caution or do you gamble that it is bad intel, possibly at the expense of the safety of your people?

I think when your starting a war you err on the side of caution. Look, the U.S. main human asset in Iraq prior to the war was Ahmed Chalabi, a man the U.S. now says was acting in the best interest of Iran at the time, and a man known to have had political ambitions in a free Iraq.

[Yonivore]

There are other things just now coming to light.

The oil-for-food scandal, for example. It now appears that Saddam Hussein was diverting millions in OFF kickbacks to al Qaeda through a front company -- the Iraqi government owned -- in the United Arab Emirates.

I'm telling you...when the truth comes out, it'll be bigger than an Nbadanallah conspiracy and will finally show why France, Russia, Germany, and the U.N. Secretary General's office were so opposed to this war.

[Nbadan]

Everybody, including the U.S. was making money of the Food for Aid program. The U.S. let Syria import oil from Iraq in exchange for Syrian cooperation in the war on terrorism. That is, until the media caught wind of the illegal pipeline. Then the Neocons twisted it to seem like it was Syria doing it behind the back of the U.S. led export embargo.

[xrayzebra]

=============================================
Bad intel is bad intel.
=============================================

Isn't that what Monica said. Or was it Clinton who
said "bad(in) tail is bad (in)tail".

:bang