Log in

View Full Version : Stop being duped by the 3D scam



ElNono
04-23-2011, 11:35 AM
Stop being duped by the 3D scam (http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/hiner/stop-being-duped-by-the-3d-scam/7983?tag=nl.e010)

Takeaway: The entertainment and electronics industries keep trying to push 3D on consumers, even though a lot of smart people have caught on to the fact that it’s a scam. It’s time to stop the madness.

MannyIsGod
04-23-2011, 12:49 PM
Couldn't agree more

xellos88330
04-23-2011, 01:24 PM
I could never stand 3D. I hate those damn glasses. Isn't worth getting glasses that are under/oversized that you have to put on just to see a picture somewhat clearly, and suffer the headaches/sores from the glasses, not the tv.

LnGrrrR
04-23-2011, 02:09 PM
I think that 3D gaming could be awesome, but I haven't had a chance to play any yet to find out.

Are the problems the author lists fixable through better technology or an inherent limitation of the 3D format?

IronMaxipad
04-23-2011, 02:13 PM
Fuck 3D and Fuck James Cameron (http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/apr/12/james-cameron-3d-film?&CMP=EMCFLMEML1672).

IronMexican
04-23-2011, 02:14 PM
Fuck HDtv's. Still got a tube. Come the fuck at me.

LnGrrrR
04-23-2011, 02:25 PM
This article has some more interesting info, and a better explanation of why 3D isnt optimal.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html

MannyIsGod
04-23-2011, 02:47 PM
LnG I think its obvious that they could make it look better over time, but for me it adds nothing and is merely a gimick. I don't feel more immersed in the movies at all and it adds nothing at a raised rate.

As long as I'm given the option I really don't care, though.

Viva Las Espuelas
04-23-2011, 03:26 PM
I'd say, and have said, keep the 3D hype alive. I don't care for it. Maybe the occasional 3D movie at the theater but keep it alive to keep the prices of 2D sets down. Or somewhat down.

BlackSwordsMan
04-23-2011, 03:28 PM
Yeah 3D is shit but priest 3d comes out in two weeks.

Cane
04-23-2011, 03:46 PM
George Lucas has been saying that 3D was the future of filmmaking for years, even before the prequels were released, and now he's spending more money converting Episode 1 into 3D than it did to make it in the first place if I remember right. With the success of Avatar and the release of the Nintendo 3DS, Lucas might be on to something.

But for me there's not enough quality 3D titles out there that makes it worth it. Although I did think Avatar was one hell of a moviegoing experience and Hubble 3D was fun as well. However when it comes to Toy Story 3D and other movies where 3D seemed more like an afterthought than a driving part of the experience...not so much...

ynh
04-24-2011, 12:11 AM
I can't stand 3D.. saw my first film in 3D last summer and it hurt my eyes. Bought the 3Ds and have the same problem where it just doesn't feel right and most of the time I just shut it off. I know there are quite a bit of people that have the same issues with it bothering them as I do.

ManuBalboa
04-24-2011, 01:30 AM
I have 20/20 vision and Avatar 3d was blurry as fuk for me in the theaters. I asked everyone else and it was clear. wtf

leemajors
04-24-2011, 04:02 AM
Fuck 3D and Fuck James Cameron (http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/apr/12/james-cameron-3d-film?&CMP=EMCFLMEML1672).

He's a moron.

TDMVPDPOY
04-24-2011, 04:23 AM
how about bringing down the prices for a +65 and lower on power consumption....

Nathan Explosion
04-24-2011, 09:49 PM
Maybe the occasional 3D movie at the theater but...

Exactly. Some movies can benefit from having 3D. Not be totally dependent on it, but it can add a little something.

I saw Harry Potter (not the last one, but the one before because I had a free pass) and only the first few scenes were in 3D, which sucked.

But I was thinking that some of the scenes could have looked pretty cool in 3D. But a lot of movies don't need to be 3D. The 2D versions will do just fine (or even suck just as bad as the 3D version).

Really, only movies that rely on lots of visual effects (not necessarily computer, but just grand, sweeping type scenes) should be considered (but not necessarily done) for 3D. Things like Toy Story or Drive Angry don't need to be 3D. Neither one benefits from being in 3D.

Viva Las Espuelas
04-24-2011, 10:04 PM
George Lucas has been saying that 3D was the future of filmmaking for years, even before the prequels were released, and now he's spending more money converting Episode 1 into 3D than it did to make it in the first place if I remember right. With the success of Avatar and the release of the Nintendo 3DS, Lucas might be on to something.

But for me there's not enough quality 3D titles out there that makes it worth it. Although I did think Avatar was one hell of a moviegoing experience and Hubble 3D was fun as well. However when it comes to Toy Story 3D and other movies where 3D seemed more like an afterthought than a driving part of the experience...not so much...

Right when Ep III came out, I read that he was taking a few years off then going back and making every episode in 3D. Should be interesting what he does with it.

Nathan Explosion
04-25-2011, 12:33 PM
Right when Ep III came out, I read that he was taking a few years off then going back and making every episode in 3D. Should be interesting what he does with it.

I don't think it will add anything or even be that good. Really, if a movie is going to be in 3D it has to be shot in 3D with certain aspects of the film taking advantage of new dimension.

Going back and converting isn't anything special at all.

TacoCabanaFajitas
04-25-2011, 05:49 PM
Avatar was the first and last movie I saw in 3D that I actually felt the 3D aspect made it something special. Saw UP, Toy Story 3 in 3d with my daughter and felt ripped off both times. The colors aren't as vibrant and I found myself with the glasses off for the most part during both of those

ynh
04-25-2011, 10:38 PM
That's how I felt with dispicable me.. Believe I spent half the movie with them off just to rest my eyes.

Chachachango
04-26-2011, 05:54 PM
Toy Story sucked with three d. Watched the whole movie without the glasses. I didnt see much difference with the glasses on or off

Cant_Be_Faded
04-26-2011, 07:33 PM
I got a samsung 3D tv because the deal i got online for it was cheaper than its non 3D equivalent. I totally agree its a stupid gimmick and would never have bought it if not for the deal.

Spurminator
04-26-2011, 07:45 PM
It's a bit of a stretch to call it a scam. If you pay to see a 3D movie, you see a 3D movie. Many people like it and go back for more.

Wild Cobra
04-26-2011, 08:54 PM
Stop being duped by the 3D scam (http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/hiner/stop-being-duped-by-the-3d-scam/7983?tag=nl.e010)

Takeaway: The entertainment and electronics industries keep trying to push 3D on consumers, even though a lot of smart people have caught on to the fact that it’s a scam. It’s time to stop the madness.
I wouldn't say it's a scam. I think it's cool. Just not cool enough for me to buy it though.

Wild Cobra
04-26-2011, 08:57 PM
I have 20/20 vision and Avatar 3d was blurry as fuk for me in the theaters. I asked everyone else and it was clear. wtf

When I saw Avatar in 3D, it was f'n awesome! You must have been to a theater where they simply f'd up the projector alignment or focus.

3D, for me, is to be kept in the theater, or special glasses that have two screens built in. Not on the limitations of a TV screen.

Strike
04-26-2011, 09:56 PM
I wouldn't say it's a scam. I think it's cool. Just not cool enough for me to buy it though.

Agreed. Not a scam. Just a novelty that advertisers have been able to convince consumers is the next big thing they need.

I neither need nor want 3D TV.

leemajors
04-26-2011, 10:19 PM
When I saw Avatar in 3D, it was f'n awesome! You must have been to a theater where they simply f'd up the projector alignment or focus.

3D, for me, is to be kept in the theater, or special glasses that have two screens built in. Not on the limitations of a TV screen.

Not everyone can see 3D, that's a stupid assumption. There are plenty of people out there with vision problems (diagnosed or not) that make it near impossible to process the images properly with both eyes.

Wild Cobra
04-27-2011, 01:29 AM
Not everyone can see 3D, that's a stupid assumption. There are plenty of people out there with vision problems (diagnosed or not) that make it near impossible to process the images properly with both eyes.
Yes, my oldest daughter is that way. Still, I think the idea of the OP is out of touch.

greyforest
04-27-2011, 05:00 AM
don't buy a 3dtv with those stupid ass glasses. that shit's already obsolete.

scott
05-04-2011, 09:47 PM
I paid a lot of money to never wear glasses again... fuck anyone who wants me to pay to have to wear them to watch TV.

DPG21920
05-10-2011, 09:00 PM
I agree overall, but I thought Avatar 3D was on another level. The colors were vibrant and it was like I was walking around that damn planet myself IMO. Maybe it largely depends on what theater you see it at.

The one thing I have yet to see that and the only thing that really interest me is 3D basketball. Has anyone seen it? Supposedly the technology Cuban has that he aired at All-Star weekend was something spectacular. To me, 3D sports could be awesome.

baseline bum
05-10-2011, 09:04 PM
The one thing I have yet to see that and the only thing that really interest me is 3D basketball. Has anyone seen it? Supposedly the technology Cuban has that he aired at All-Star weekend was something spectacular. To me, 3D sports could be awesome.

Would have been great for 21 after Bynum got ejected, tbh.

DPG21920
05-10-2011, 09:08 PM
Also, I can't believe no one has made a thread about YouTube Movies launching. (not 3d related)

Sense
05-10-2011, 10:03 PM
I'm proud to say I've never seen a 3D movie nor will I ever pay to see one... FUCK THAT SHIT...

Drachen
05-10-2011, 10:11 PM
Not everyone can see 3D, that's a stupid assumption. There are plenty of people out there with vision problems (diagnosed or not) that make it near impossible to process the images properly with both eyes.

Don't go swimming in Canyon Lake with your eyes open. All I have to say. It will ruin your ability to play baseball in the exact season when you made a breakthrough and became significantly better than your peers.

Spurtacus
05-11-2011, 12:19 PM
I'm proud to say I've never seen a 3D movie nor will I ever pay to see one... FUCK THAT SHIT...

Same. Won't get a 3D tv, won't get a 3DS, won't get a 3D smartphone. Last time I tried 3D was the stupid red/blue glasses with Family Guy Blue Harvest. Headache within seconds.

cheguevara
05-11-2011, 12:33 PM
a scam???

a scam is having to pay for text messages to cellular companies

a scam is having to pay for additional features in phone apps/games

a scam is having your personal information sold to the highest bidder by Google and Apple

:lol at waging war at 3D

DMC
05-12-2011, 07:28 PM
Shit, I just bought some 1080p glasses. Now everything around me is in high definition. Next up, 3D.

Blake
05-13-2011, 10:45 AM
+1 on the hate for the 3D movies/tv

Agloco
06-10-2011, 02:22 PM
Agreed. Not a scam. Just a novelty that advertisers have been able to convince consumers is the next big thing they need.

I neither need nor want 3D TV.

This. Ditto for those 120 and 204Hz TV's.....

lefty
06-10-2011, 02:44 PM
3D sucks major donkey ass

Nathan Explosion
06-11-2011, 12:07 AM
This. Ditto for those 120 and 204Hz TV's.....

I have a 60Hz tv and when I'm watching fast action sports, I do see it getting blurry, so maybe the 120Hz isn't such a bad thing.

But I don't really notice it on games. Maybe I'm just too focused on the action to see it happening, or maybe it just doesn't really happen.