man exposes Scientist lying in the text books and gets run off the radio.

[mouse]

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2274708

[Agloco]

You've snapped. :lol

[mouse]

I still had my other point about the Space Station and NASA to make.

I have heard callers take the whole 20 minute segment as long as they can Bash Obama he knew my topic was creating a buzz and he wanted to talk about Mike Vick.

If you listen to the following segments many callers want to react to my call,



http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2274709




Isn't that what radio is really all about... getting the public involved so they can have huge ratings so they sell airtime with ads and make a profit, am i missing something here?


That show could have easily blown away WOAI's Live Coast to Coast with Professor Igmo who claims he is an expert on Moth Man and knows why he's here on earth.

But hey..that's just my opinion, something we once had on the radio...

[4>0rings]

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2274708
:lmao:lmao:lmao

I can't tell if you were being serious or trolling him but...

:rollin

[Wild Cobra]

Isn't that what radio is really all about... getting the public involved so they can have huge ratings so they sell airtime with ads and make a profit, am i missing something here?

No, the purpose of the caller, is to make the host look good.

[Wild Cobra]

You've snapped. :lol
He's always been lie that.

[mouse]

:lmao:lmao:lmao

I can't tell if you were being serious or trolling him but...

:rollin

click on the show links that say Aug 31 and hear the feedback.
http://www.wabcradio.com/sectional.asp?id=37817

[mouse]

No, the purpose of the caller, is to make the host look good.

Is that why Nbadan will never have his calls heard on Rush Limbaugh?

[Wild Cobra]

Is that why Nbadan will never have his calls heard on Rush Limbaugh?
I don't know. Does he waste his time calling in? Ever actually get a ring-ring, or is it always busy like thousands of other callers get each day?

[Agloco]

But hey..that's just my opinion, something we once had on the radio...

You should have hit him with your "Michael Jackson is alive" theory as well. You might have induced an on air suicide.

[RandomGuy]

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2274708

Oh boy. another link to a long video/audio track from someone who won't listen/watch anything anybody else posts.

Please post more.

[DMC]

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2274708

Self proclaimed troll god status aside, you love yourself more than anyone I've ever encountered. You must score a ton of pussy.

[mouse]

Self proclaimed troll god status aside, you love yourself more than anyone I've ever encountered. You must score a ton of pussy.

Success of a man is not based on how much pussy he gets.

Sincerely:

http://jewishsinglemaltwhiskysociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/johnHolmes.jpg

[mouse]

You should have hit him with your "Michael Jackson is alive" theory as well. You might have induced an on air suicide.

Proving the Grand Canyon is not two million years old like you and your yuppy radiation pals think it is I find much more satisfying.

I already posted at the mans Facebook page he knows what to expect next time I call in.

[Wild Cobra]

Proving the Grand Canyon is not two million years old like you and your yuppy radiation pals think it is I find much more satisfying.

I already posted at the mans Facebook page he knows what to expect next time I call in.

You fail to understand that water doesn't do much damage when it's not under pressure. The water for the concrete tunnel was under tremendous pressure.

[mouse]

Oh boy. another link to a long video/audio track from someone who won't listen/watch anything anybody else posts.

Please post more.


Maybe one day when you grow a pair and call in a live radio show you can post the audio also.

Grand Canyon not as old as recently claimed


http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/2008/09/grand-canyon-not-as-old-as-recently.html

Geologists Phil Pearthree and Jon Spencer from AZGS, and Jim Faulds and Kyle House from the Nevada Bureau of Mines are challenging a recent report that claimed the Grand Canyon started forming 17 million years ago. [right, National Park Service]

[Wild Cobra]

Maybe one day when you grow a pair and call in a live radio show you can post the audio also.

Grand Canyon not as old as recently claimed


http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/2008/09/grand-canyon-not-as-old-as-recently.html

Geologists Phil Pearthree and Jon Spencer from AZGS, and Jim Faulds and Kyle House from the Nevada Bureau of Mines are challenging a recent report that claimed the Grand Canyon started forming 17 million years ago. [right, National Park Service]
That's still way more than the 60 days to make it.

[mouse]

You fail to understand that water doesn't do much damage when it's not under pressure. The water for the concrete tunnel was under tremendous pressure.

You fail to understand the Grand canyon was a result of a spillover. That is water building up pressure then released all at once.



damage Irene just one day of rain


http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article538999.ece/BINARY/w620/Irene.jpg

http://a57.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/U.S./396/223/irene_vermont_damage.jpg

Just think what 40 days and nights of rain can do...


http://www.stardusttrailers.com/gallery_film/Waterworld%28movie_wallpaper_pictures_photo_pics_p oster%29%28070610143219%29waterworld_4.jpg

[4>0rings]

Make a shitty movie?

[mouse]

That's still way more than the 60 days to make it.

So If I say 3,998 people died on 9/11 and you say 3,997 people died on 9/11 does that mean we have to stop giving our personal views on 9/11?

The point is the Grand Canyon could have been carved in two years it's still 16 million 998.000 years less than your Darwin lovers claim.

You obliviously have no clue how powerful water is and what it can do in just hours.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/02/article-1217599-06AA83D5000005DC-808_634x474.jpg

[mouse]

Make a shitty movie?

Only the people who paid 8 dollars to go see water world were pissed,
the people like myself that downloaded it for free thought it was alright.

[Agloco]

Proving the Grand Canyon is not two million years old like you and your yuppy radiation pals think it is I find much more satisfying.

Does this mean you have time to lecture me about the inaccuracies of carbon dating?

[DMC]

Why hasn't the Mississippi River then created another Grand Canyon?

[fraga]

http://www.nypress.com/imgs/hed/art20239.jpg

[mouse]

Does this mean you have time to lecture me about the inaccuracies of carbon dating?


Your move brah!

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/chump2.jpg


Two known facts:

A: I don't lecture people, I try to educate them.

B: I don't want to waste time educating the ignorant.

Don't go were you may want to come the same..........


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/Mallen-Blue-2.gif

[mouse]

:lmao


http://www.nypress.com/imgs/hed/art20239.jpg

[Agloco]

Your move brah!

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/chump2.jpg


Two known facts:

A: I don't lecture people, I try to educate them.

B: I don't want to waste time educating the ignorant.

Don't go were you may want to come the same..........


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/Mallen-Blue-2.gif

I eagerly await your sermon.

[Agloco]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/Mallen-Blue-2.gif

Honestly though mouse, this is a cool picture. Did you know that cesium137 emits a bluish glow?

Hey, that reminds me.........have you ever been to Brazil?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goi%C3%A2nia_accident


A few days later one man broke open the iridium window which allowed him to see the caesium chloride emitting a deep blue light.[1]

The exact mechanism by which the light was generated was not known at the time the IAEA report was written. The light is thought to be either fluorescence or Cherenkov radiation associated with the absorption of moisture by the source; similar blue light was observed in 1988 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory during the disencapsulation of a 137Cs source. The man scooped out some of the radioactive caesium and tried to light it, thinking it was gunpowder, and eventually gave up.

You weren't a part of that were you?

[boutons_deux]

...

[Vici]

That was one of the dumbest things I have ever heard in my life.

[Vici]

Still can't believe how retarded that was.

BTW mouse they do know how Stone Henge was built.

[ElNono]

Still can't believe how retarded that was.

BTW mouse they do know how Stone Henge was built.

http://www.thebeachmonkeys.com/stonehenge-monkeys_op_681x428.jpg

[Agloco]

http://www.thebeachmonkeys.com/stonehenge-monkeys_op_681x428.jpg

:lol

[DMC]

Mouse reminds me of this onion article:

http://www.theonion.com/articles/somebody-should-do-something-about-all-the-problem,11018/

[TE]

This is one of the most stupidest threads ever in this forum's history.

[mouse]

Theses men received the same ignorant responses I am getting before they're simpleminded non believing asses were educated to their causes.

http://sln.fi.edu/franklin/inventor/images/belllg.jpg


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-d58jtcy0v8E/TVTG-QHlIzI/AAAAAAAAAB8/-qDmD100pRg/s1600/Thomas-Edison-lightbulb-moment.jpg


http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Technology/images-2/bill-gates-microsoft-young.jpg

[RandomGuy]

Just think what 40 days and nights of rain can do...


http://www.stardusttrailers.com/gallery_film/Waterworld%28movie_wallpaper_pictures_photo_pics_p oster%29%28070610143219%29waterworld_4.jpg


Make a shitty movie?

:rollin

DING DING DING...

4>0rings = Thread winner.

All you other slim shady's is just imitatin'

/thread

[RandomGuy]

Theses men received the same ignorant responses I am getting before they're simpleminded non believing asses were educated to their causes.

1) THEIR, not "they're"

2) The sentence is structured so that "simpleminded non-believing asses" refers to "Theses men", i.e. the great inventors. I assume that is not what you intended.

[RandomGuy]

the Grand Canyon could have been carved in two years it's still 16 million 998.000 years less than your Darwin lovers claim.

You obliviously have no clue how powerful water is and what it can do in just hours.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/02/article-1217599-06AA83D5000005DC-808_634x474.jpg

:rolleyes

Uh huh.


Response:
1.We know what to expect of a sudden massive flood, namely:
•a wide, relatively shallow bed, not a deep, sinuous river channel.
•anastamosing channels (i.e., a braided river system), not a single, well-developed channel.
•coarse-grained sediments, including boulders and gravel, on the floor of the canyon.
•streamlined relict islands.

The Scablands in Washington state were produced by such a flood and show such features (Allen et al. 1986; Baker 1978; Bretz 1969; Waitt 1985). Such features are also seen on Mars at Kasei Vallis and Ares Vallis (Baker 1978; NASA Quest n.d.). They do not appear in the Grand Canyon. Compare relief maps of the two areas to see for yourself.


2.The same flood that was supposed to carve the Grand Canyon was also supposed to lay down the miles of sediment (and a few lava flows) from which the canyon is carved. A single flood cannot do both. Creationists claim that the year of the Flood included several geological events, but that still stretches credulity.


3.The Grand Canyon contains some major meanders. Upstream of the Grand Canyon, the San Juan River (around Gooseneck State Park, southeast Utah) has some of the most extreme meandering imaginable. The canyon is 1,000 feet high, with the river flowing five miles while progressing one mile as the crow flies (American Southwest n.d.). There is no way a single massive flood could carve this.


4.Recent flood sediments would be unconsolidated. If the Grand Canyon were carved in unconsolidated sediments, the sides of the canyon would show obvious slumping.


5.The inner canyon is carved into the strongly metamorphosed sediments of the Vishnu Group, which are separated by an angular unconformity from the overlying sedimentary rocks, and also in the Zoroaster Granite, which intrudes the Vishnu Group. These rocks, by all accounts, would have been quite hard before the Flood began.


6.Along the Grand Canyon are tributaries, which are as deep as the Grand Canyon itself. These tributaries are roughly perpendicular to the main canyon. A sudden massive flood would not produce such a pattern.


7.Sediment from the Colorado River has been shifted northward over the years by movement along the San Andreas and related faults (Winker and Kidwell 1986). Such movement of the delta sediment would not occur if the canyon were carved as a single event.


8.The lakes that Austin proposed as the source for the carving floodwaters are not large compared with the Grand Canyon itself. The flood would have to remove more material than the floodwaters themselves.


9.If a brief interlude of rushing water produced the Grand Canyon, there should be many more such canyons. Why are there not other grand canyons surrounding all the margins of all continents?


10.There is a perfectly satisfactory gradual explanation for the formation of the Grand Canyon that avoids all these problems. Sediments deposited about two billion years ago were metamorphosed and intruded by granite to become today's basement layers. Other sediments were deposited in the late Proterozoic and were subsequently folded, faulted, and eroded. More sediments were deposited in the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, with a period of erosion in between. The Colorado Plateau started rising gradually about seventy million years ago. As it rose, existing rivers deepened, carving through the previous sediments (Harris and Kiver 1985, 273-282).

Note:

Darwin was not a geologist.

[mouse]

Note:

Darwin was not a geologist.

We all know Darwin wasn't worth a shit. Some old hash smoking drunk finds a few birds on an island that look the same with different beaks then writes a book about how we evolved from snails and you simpleminded fools cling on his words like Joe Chalupa at an Obama rally.


It pains me to even have to educate some of you people to a level where I can try to debate properly.

Scientist all over the world are admitting they was wrong about the earth being Billions of years old, to bad many of them (out of fear) won't go on the record.

I suggest you don't miss my next call it will blow the host and listeners away.

The gloves are coming off now.

[RandomGuy]

we evolved from snails

Someone who doesn't even know what a theory is, trying to debunk it.

:lol

That's comedy right there.

If you can't clearly state what the theory of evolution says in your own words, you have zero credibility when it comes to criticizing it, sorry.

[mouse]

Someone who doesn't even know what a theory is, trying to debunk it.

:lol

That's comedy right there.

If you can't clearly state what the theory of evolution says in your own words, you have zero credibility when it comes to criticizing it, sorry.

I knew that would go over your small brain.

allow me to educate you.....

Evolution teaches us the Earth was 4 billion years old it took two billion years for it to cool down during that time there were huge pools of liquid that life started to form and millions of years later that life slithered out from the pools and grew legs.

what part of evolving from a Snail do you not get?



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa8.jpg

Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?

[mouse]

turn on your AM radio.............

[ChumpDumper]

No thanks.

[mouse]

Maybe being a Darwin supporter you find a banana more appealing?

[Agloco]

Maybe being a Darwin supporter you find a banana more appealing?

Mouse pushing radioactive foods here?

:lol

[mouse]

as promised....


17:22 / 42:40

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2297308

[Fabbs]

mouse,
i believe in creation. However, i do not believe each creative "day" was 6,000 years. "Day" can be a relative term. I do believe the earth could have been formed billions of years ago and God put life on it in a relatively shorter recent time as laid out in Genesis, which as you know is supported by science.

Can you agree with that?

[Vici]

I knew that would go over your small brain.

allow me to educate you.....

Evolution teaches us the Earth was 4 billion years old it took two billion years for it to cool down during that time there were huge pools of liquid that life started to form and millions of years later that life slithered out from the pools and grew legs.

what part of evolving from a Snail do you not get?



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa8.jpg

Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?


LMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Where did you get snail from? So from that I'm guessing that all life evolved from a snail, then (somehow going back to being aquatic), then a fog, then regressing again to an alligator, then a platypus?, then regressing again to a bird, then monkey, finally a human?

Jesus Christ you didn't go to school very long did you?

[mouse]

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Where did you get snail from?

Science text books



So from that I'm guessing that all life evolved from a snail,


Read any 7th grade science book.





then (somehow going back to being aquatic), then a fog, then regressing again to an alligator, then a platypus?, then regressing again to a bird, then monkey, finally a human?

I knew you would get it!





Jesus Christ you didn't go to school very long did you?

What school would you recommend?

[Blake]

What school would you recommend?

a college, tbh

[DMX7]

Bill Gates used to look like Tony Hawk.

[Vici]

Science text books





Read any 7th grade science book.






I knew you would get it!






What school would you recommend?

Funny, Bachelors of Science in Human Biology degree must be worthless since not a single book or journal mentioned mammals, much less humans, evolved from snails.

Give one source, even if the guy is insane and not a scientist, that mentions life came from a snail. It's more for entertainment on my part :lmao

[Vici]

a college, tbh

I was thinking he should just finish his G.E.D. but why not shoot for the stars.

[TDMVPDPOY]

lol mouse trollin good job

[Blake]

what part of evolving from a Snail do you not get?



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa8.jpg

lol you don't know how arrows in a picture work


Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?

Michael Denton did. He now believes in evolution by design.

[RandomGuy]

Funny, Bachelors of Science in Human Biology degree must be worthless since not a single book or journal mentioned mammals, much less humans, evolved from snails.

Give one source, even if the guy is insane and not a scientist, that mentions life came from a snail. It's more for entertainment on my part :lmao

I've schooled mouse on this already.

He knows it is wrong, but still uses the statement in his trolling. Or maybe hell, he forgot getting spanked. mouse is not one with a great short-term memory, no offense, m.

[RandomGuy]

I knew that would go over your small brain.

allow me to educate you.....

Evolution teaches us the Earth was 4 billion years old it took two billion years for it to cool down during that time there were huge pools of liquid that life started to form and millions of years later that life slithered out from the pools and grew legs.

Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

[Vici]

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

Apparently the world was covered in snails at some point.

[LnGrrrR]

Mouse is a dangerously insane individual.

[JoeChalupa]

Mouse is a dangerously insane individual.

:lmao

[Agloco]

What school would you recommend?

Well from the looks of it, not MIT.

[mouse]

Funny, Bachelors of Science in Human Biology degree must be worthless since not a single book or journal mentioned mammals, much less humans, evolved from snails.


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3427/3248936585_1f397f2129.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa7.jpg

Do you even know how snails came about?

Do you know anything about what the text books teach?

The books in school teach the earth took billions of years to cool down and out of the pools of liquid life was formed.

From that life snails evolved and later on man evolved, what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?



Give one source, even if the guy is insane and not a scientist, that mentions life came from a snail. It's more for entertainment on my part :lmao

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa6.jpg
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/book.jpg


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/evolutiontree.gif
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/book6.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/snail.jpg

[Blake]

Look at the tree picture you posted.

A snail is in the mollusk family.

Lol

[Blake]

Look at the tree picture you posted.

A snail is in the mollusk family.

Lol

[LnGrrrR]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3427/3248936585_1f397f2129.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa7.jpg

Do you even know how snails came about?

Do you know anything about what the text books teach?

The books in school teach the earth took billions of years to cool down and out of the pools of liquid life was formed.

From that life snails evolved and later on man evolved, what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?




http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa6.jpg
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/book.jpg


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/evolutiontree.gif
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/book6.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/snail.jpg

You could've just said, "No, I can't find anyone who says that life originated from snails".

[mouse]

Look at the tree picture you posted.

A snail is in the mollusk family.

Lol

That's right cherry pick some typo instead of addressing the subject matter.

You guys are out of your league on this subject stick to debating sports.

[RandomGuy]

what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/snail.jpg

:lmao

Snails and humans have a common ancestor, but the very picture you posted shows that you are wrong.

You have, in essence, a family tree, and are saying that my 2nd cousin is my grandfather.

:rollin

You don't even understand the theory you are attempting to troll. That is funny.

[Blake]

That's right cherry pick some typo instead of addressing the subject matter.

You guys are out of your league on this subject stick to debating sports.

lol typo

5th grade science book pictures are obviously out of your league

[RandomGuy]

what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/snail.jpg

what part of I am the grandson of my cousin vinny do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://spurstalk.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=57&pictureid=1642

See? I have this family tree with us both on it. That obviously proves Cousin Vinny is my grandfather.

[Blake]

:lol

Ralph named his boys Vinny and Guido?

did Ralph have mob ties?

[mouse]

:lmao

Snails and humans have a common ancestor, but the very picture you posted shows that you are wrong.

You have, in essence, a family tree, and are saying that my 2nd cousin is my grandfather.

:rollin

You don't even understand the theory you are attempting to troll. That is funny.


Maybe a simpler explanation is necessary.......


Lets say a loft of bread came before the Cresent, they still are made from flour.

If life started in a warm pool of liquid what part of snail and man do you not get?

keyword (flour)


please don't make me have to simplify it any further.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/oos-books.jpg

[mouse]

5th grade science book pictures are obviously out of your league

So you care nothing about children in the 5th grade?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/cf_bookguide3_main_.jpg

[mouse]

what part of I am the grandson of my cousin vinny do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://spurstalk.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=57&pictureid=1642

See? I have this family tree with us both on it. That obviously proves Cousin Vinny is my grandfather.

I knew you would make the connection. I know this new shit is hard for some of you to take in. Baby steps....don't overwhelm your brains.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa2.jpg

[mouse]

:lol

Ralph named his boys Vinny and Guido?

did Ralph have mob ties?

He only wore turtle necks.

Ralph Lauren

http://www.seventeen.com/cm/cosmogirl/images/2k/RalphLauren-de.jpg

[mouse]

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

And your evidence is from where?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/22222222-1.jpg

[Blake]

And your evidence is from where?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/22222222-1.jpg

Why is there a quote from the "Financial Times" on the cover of that book?

[Agloco]

And your evidence is from where?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/22222222-1.jpg

Snails mouse? Got into a dime bag full of hocus pocus again?

[mouse]

Snails mouse? Got into a dime bag full of hocus pocus again?

I knew the snail metaphor would go right over your head.

go back a page I explain it for the slow thinkers.

[mouse]

Why is there a quote from the "Financial Times" on the cover of that book?

Check with the book publisher.


Another book found in the classrooms.
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/555.jpg

[Agloco]

I knew the snail metaphor would go right over your head.

go back a page I explain it for the slow thinkers.

Slow thinker? Been a while since I held that distinction.

Thanks for the kudos mouse.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

Geology is what I think you are looking for and the creationists have hated on James Hutton's Theory of the Earth too.

[Vici]

I'm guessing you haven't read a page from any of those books.

[Blake]

go back a page I explain it for the slow thinkers.

only a slow thinker would not recognize that mouse is the resident slow thinker

[mouse]

Slow thinker? Been a while since I held that distinction.

Thanks for the kudos mouse.

Your the one who who told posters in the Club your not educated.

I am just trying to support your theory.

[mouse]

only a slow thinker would not recognize that mouse is the resident slow thinker



How slow do you have to think to wait till page #2 to realize it?

I suggest you guys do some Research....errr......I mean ...Googling. before you debate this topic. (just heads up)

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2297308


know when you've been licked...


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/sour-puss.gif

[mouse]

The cover up


10:40 of 48:48

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=37817&ID=2274709

[mouse]

I love when a debate topic is on page two and I was the last to post in it.

You bitches better do your homework before you debate me on age of earth or Evolution.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/c14Mollusk.jpg

[admiralsnackbar]

I love when a debate topic is on page two and I was the last to post in it.

You bitches better do your homework before you debate me on age of earth or Evolution.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/c14Mollusk.jpg

No offense, but it's a bit of a stretch to pretend to scientific credibility in the same breath that you brag about how awesome it is being a night watchman who rocks his shift on Netflix. At least you could say you spend your time reading.

But you don't.

[man on wire]

Have there been any follow-up calls to the show? You didn't really make any valid points in the first one although it was a great balancing act between so called facts and comedy.

[mouse]

No offense, but it's a bit of a stretch to pretend to scientific credibility in the same breath that you brag about how awesome it is being a night watchman who rocks his shift on Netflix. At least you could say you spend your time reading.

But you don't.

Pardon the outdated graphics and book links.

I have a full time job, post in over 24 different forums, have 4 documentaries I need to complete by 2013... and have pet rabbit that chewed the power cord to my 9300 dell laptop?


Don't resort to trying to insulting me to gain debate points... prove me wrong.



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/kennedy2006-fig.gif

pull out the Ice Core card so I can bend you over

[Agloco]

I love when a debate topic is on page two and I was the last to post in it.

You bitches better do your homework before you debate me on age of earth or Evolution.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/c14Mollusk.jpg

It means that the apathy towards the junk you post is becoming more pervasive. This is a good thing imo.

[Blake]

How slow do you have to think to wait till page #2 to realize it?


I dunno. What's the standard time that someone should figure out that you are the resident slow thinker?

[mouse]

No offense, but....

That could ruin your credibility to say you don't want to offend me and yet you do anyway. (heads up) you could look like a flip flopper or some one you can't trust.
And I don't mean that in an offensive way.


it's a bit of a stretch[/quote

Telling students they evolved from an ape and not having any proof is more of a stretch. You trying to urinate in the men's room and actually get in in the urinal and not on your pay less shoes for the first time, is more of a stretch.. (you see how the lame smack doesn't work in debate topics?)


[quote]to pretend to scientific credibility in the same breath that you brag about how awesome it is being a night watchman who rocks his shift on Netflix.

Perhaps your misinformed mate... This isn't my first age of earth or Evolution debate. I can do this shit playing XBox 360 God of War on my chicks ass while we 69ing each other.

Just post some facts and move on this is no place for wannabee smack talkers.







At least you could say you spend your time reading.

But you don't.

How many times do you read a book you have read already. It;s not my fault I all ready did the research it's your lame ass fault for coming in a debate unprepared and resorting to Spurs Report style of posting.

This may be the easiest debate i ever participated in. You guys are some ignorant well educated people. You don't even understand the Snail theory and its from your master Darwin himself.

Scientist today back the snail theory. I didn't make this shit up. Do I need to explain for a 3rd time?


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/66666666.jpg

[mouse]

It means that the apathy towards the junk you post is becoming more pervasive. This is a good thing imo.

And what have you posted? Mr. (look at me I'm educated)

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/555555.jpg

[mouse]

I dunno. What's the standard time that someone should figure out that you are the resident slow thinker?

Well according to your Big Bang scientists you support how about 4 Billion years?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-258480.png

[Agloco]

And what have you posted?

I'm quite certain that my input here far outweighs any contributions you've made.


Mr. (look at me I'm educated)

Would it make you feel better if I told you I held a GED instead?

[Agloco]

Telling students they evolved from an ape and not having any proof is more of a stretch. You trying to urinate in the men's room and actually get in in the urinal and not on your pay less shoes for the first time, is more of a stretch.. (you see how the lame smack doesn't work in debate topics?)

The only "debate" is the one occurring in your head. This isn't a debate mouse, this is a joke.


Telling students they evolved from an ape and not having any proof is more of a stretch.

lol escargot

[Blake]

Well according to your Big Bang scientists you support how about 4 Billion years?


So figuring out you are the resident slow thinker by page #2 is actually incredibly fast.

I'm betting most posters figure it out even faster than that.

[mouse]

I see allot of outdated smack but no evidence.

[mouse]

The only "debate" is the one occurring in your head.

which head?


Notice the "snail" in the picture below.
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-222670.png

[Agloco]

which head?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-2011-05-16-14h39m37s153.png

The one composed predominantly of air.

[TE]

Nice cap.

[mouse]

The one composed predominantly of air.

Unlike yours that is deprived of oxygen.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-243756.png

[Halberto]

So If I say 3,998 people died on 9/11 and you say 3,997 people died on 9/11 does that mean we have to stop giving our personal views on 9/11?

The point is the Grand Canyon could have been carved in two years it's still 16 million 998.000 years less than your Darwin lovers claim.

You obliviously have no clue how powerful water is and what it can do in just hours.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/02/article-1217599-06AA83D5000005DC-808_634x474.jpg




:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol


where do I begin.... oh man. Study some geology before you make such assumptions....



:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin


EDIT:randomguy nails it with his quote. the first few points destroys Mouse's simpleminded conspiracy theory. Also, I believe I read Darwin was actually a Geologist in his early life.

[mouse]

:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol

where do I begin....

On page one



oh man. Study some geology before you make such assumptions....

My point exactly ,the books are flawed. Why study something that is has not been proven?




:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin

Evidence you don't take this subject serious.




I believe

That makes it a religion... not....a " Science"




I read Darwin

My point exactly. (on page one)





was actually a Geologist in his early life.

And Jesus was a carpenter... what's your point?

[Agloco]

Unlike yours that is deprived of oxygen.

Banter much? If you're going to make a point, make it. We'll all be fossilized before word one at this pace.

[Halberto]

On page one

:rolleyes



My point exactly ,the books are flawed. Why study something that is has not been proven?


WTF are you saying? How do you want someone to prove it will take millions of years for rock to erode? If you took the time to read a book you would understand. You could also read the short explanation that randomguy provided, but that would just roll off your simple, lazy mind as bullshit. Science makes sense for those who are willing to take the time to understand.



That makes it a religion... not....a " Science"

You're right, all those people getting PhD's and the people who find oil are just witchdoctors. Anyone can do what they do.





And Jesus was a carpenter... what's your point?

I was simply responding to randomguy claiming Darwin was not a geologist.

[Agloco]

You're right, all those people getting PhD's and the people who find oil are just witchdoctors. Anyone can do what they do.

Anyone mouse, anyone. Even you.

:lol

[mouse]

Who keeps saying they don't teach Man evolved from a snail to the students?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-222670.png

[TDMVPDPOY]

And Jesus was a carpenter... what's your point?

any proof on this what he built?

[mouse]

any proof on this what he built?

Have you tried Craigslist or eBay?
Most of his stuff is rare and hard to find.

http://truelovechurchofrefuge.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/carpenter.jpg

What I don't get is how your weak Bible bashing outdated smack has to do with the Science text books that need to be updated. That is why I call the shows to get a legit answer.

Save your Creationist baiting material for Angel-Luv

I don't support the Bible or Intelligent design I support facts over theories.

And Isn't Science all about "facts"

[Halberto]

This isn't worth my time. Mouse probably failed calculus and physics in high school.

[mouse]

This isn't worth my time.

Translation: I do have time after all I took time to come in here to hurl a lame insult. it's my way to show people I passed calculus and physics in high school and yet have nothing to add to this topic.





Mouse probably failed calculus and physics in high school.

Peter Jennings...Albert Einstein both dropped out of high school whats your point?

What kind of grades did your role model Darwin make in high school?

I heard he flunked PE and used to smoke pot during lunch.

Once again ST shows how weak minded they are on the subject of Evolution and age of earth.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/book3-1.jpg

[RandomGuy]

Translation: I do have time after all I took time to come in here to hurl a lame insult. it's my way to show people I passed calculus and physics in high school and yet have nothing to add to this topic.

Peter Jennings...Albert Einstein both dropped out of high school whats your point?

What kind of grades did your role model Darwin make in high school?

I heard he flunked PE and used to smoke pot during lunch.

Once again ST shows how weak minded they are on the subject of Evolution and age of earth.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/book3-1.jpg

FYI, you have lapsed into incoherence. Your statements used to make some small amount of semi-rational sense, but your posts/statements here lack any order that is intelligible to someone outside of your own head.

While they make sense to you, I'm sure, they don't make sense to anybody else.

[RandomGuy]

Once again ST shows how weak minded they are on the subject of Evolution and age of earth [especially when compared to my rock solid grasp of the topic].



The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled people make poor decisions and reach erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to recognize their mistakes.[1] The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their ability as above average, much higher than it actually is, while the highly skilled underrate their own abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority.

....

The hypothesized phenomenon was tested in a series of experiments performed by Justin Kruger and David Dunning, both then of Cornell University.[2][5] Kruger and Dunning noted earlier studies suggesting that ignorance of standards of performance is behind a great deal of incompetence. This pattern was seen in studies of skills as diverse as reading comprehension, operating a motor vehicle, and playing chess or tennis.

Kruger and Dunning proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will:

1.tend to overestimate their own level of skill;
2.fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
3.fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy;
4.recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill, if they can be trained to substantially improve.

Dunning has since drawn an analogy ("the anosognosia of everyday life")[1][6] to a condition in which a person who suffers a physical disability because of brain injury seems unaware of or denies the existence of the disability, even for dramatic impairments such as blindness or paralysis.

[Wild Cobra]

I support facts over theories.

LOL...

It's one thing to lie to us. I just hope you're not lying to yourself.

[Agloco]

Peter Jennings...Albert Einstein both dropped out of high school whats your point?

Now you're of the same mold as Jennings and Einstein? :lmao

Some fail due to boredom and some fail because they don't grasp things.

Rest assured, you do not fall into the same category as either of those two.

[mouse]

FYI, you have lapsed into incoherence. Your statements used to make some small amount of semi-rational sense, but your posts/statements here lack any order that is intelligible to someone outside of your own head.

While they make sense to you, I'm sure, they don't make sense to anybody else.


They said the same thing to Thomas Edison.

Don't get blown away from my comments, do your own research and prove me wrong. I knew this topic was above your pay grade.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa3.jpg

[mouse]

Your words, or another cut and paste?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/EE_Coversm.jpg

[mouse]

LOL...

It's one thing to lie to us. I just hope you're not lying to yourself.

Thanks to laser surgery many can actually read this topic and judge for themselves who presented evidence.


Truth is ...this topic is recorded proof how weak Darwin's BS really is.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa2.jpg

[RandomGuy]

They said the same thing to Thomas Edison.

Don't get blown away from my comments, do your own research and prove me wrong. I knew this topic was above your pay grade.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/aa3.jpg


The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled people make poor decisions and reach erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to recognize their mistakes.[1] The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their ability as above average, much higher than it actually is, while the highly skilled underrate their own abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority.

....

The hypothesized phenomenon was tested in a series of experiments performed by Justin Kruger and David Dunning, both then of Cornell University.[2][5] Kruger and Dunning noted earlier studies suggesting that ignorance of standards of performance is behind a great deal of incompetence. This pattern was seen in studies of skills as diverse as reading comprehension, operating a motor vehicle, and playing chess or tennis.

Kruger and Dunning proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will:

1.tend to overestimate their own level of skill;
2.fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
3.fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy;
4.recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill, if they can be trained to substantially improve.

Dunning has since drawn an analogy ("the anosognosia of everyday life")[1][6] to a condition in which a person who suffers a physical disability because of brain injury seems unaware of or denies the existence of the disability, even for dramatic impairments such as blindness or paralysis.

:sleep

[Halberto]

Once again ST shows how weak minded they are on the subject of Evolution and age of earth.



Keep in mind you're telling a graduate in Geophysics that they didn't think about the subject enough.

[Agloco]

Keep in mind you're telling a graduate in Geophysics that they didn't think about the subject enough.

He cares not. The same torture was visited upon me in the threads relating to radioactivity.

Geophysics eh? Where do you work?

[Halberto]

I graduated in August and on the prowl right now. I've got an interview in Austin this week with a small exploration company, which I'm ecstatic about.

I think I remember you talking about the technology we have to detect radioactive material, it's good to hear people on here actually speaking from their own expertise instead of from their ass (mouse).

[Blake]

Thanks to laser surgery many can actually read this topic and judge for themselves who presented evidence.


You haven't presented any evidence at all.

You're just stupid.

[admiralsnackbar]

Peter Jennings...Albert Einstein both dropped out of high school whats your point?


Einstein didn't drop out of school. He left a school that chafed his style and went to another that didn't.

And Peter Jennings? I know you live to troll and all, but surely you can do better? How about Michael Faraday?

[Cry Havoc]

They said the same thing to Thomas Edison.

Don't get blown away from my comments, do your own research and prove me wrong. I knew this topic was above your pay grade.

http://i.imgur.com/6mJHR.gif

[Cry Havoc]

http://i.imgur.com/IrwhA.gif

[Borat Sagyidev]

http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/adamevepterosaur.jpg

[DarkReign]

God did it.

The End.

[mouse]

Keep in mind you're telling a graduate in Geophysics that they didn't think about the subject enough.

My point exactly. I am calling out Scientist who have more education than you, you think a piece of paper on your wall and 8 years of wasted collage makes what you say about evolution the truth?

Are you more educated than Obama? Look at the shit we are in today education can't turn a monkey into a man ignorance can.


Keep in mind there are collage professors working at wall-mart today so save your horn tooting for another topic.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/33-1.jpg

[mouse]

I graduated in August and on the prowl right now. I've got an interview in Austin this week with a small exploration company, which I'm ecstatic about.


What part of "save your horn tooting for another topic" did you not get?




I think I remember you talking about the technology we have to detect radioactive material, it's good to hear people on here actually speaking from their own expertise instead of from their ass (mouse).

Pssssst! outdated insults is not the way to show others your "so called" educated (heads up) . Please just show me Evolution is fact and move on please.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-906828.png

[mouse]

Einstein didn't drop out of school. He left a school

Ok my bad...I have to remember that one next time I fill out an application..



And Peter Jennings? I know you live to troll and all, but surely you can do better? How about Michael Faraday?

Live to TRoll? If you call exposing your lying textbooks and false Scientific claims in the schoolroom Trolling, then I shall TRoll on.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-906998.png

[mouse]

You haven't presented any evidence at all.

I don't have to i don't support evolution. make sure you read the topic from the start.



You're just stupid.

^ This is why no one respects you anymore in debate topics.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-906828.png

[mouse]

He cares not. The same torture was visited upon me in the threads relating to radioactivity. [quote]



Don't mix radiation with evolution. If that's the case didn't you say last year the Mavs would never win a Championship ring?


[quote]Geophysics eh? Where do you work?

Still trying to find a friend?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/prooof.jpg

[Halberto]

My point exactly. I am calling out Scientist who have more education than you, you think a piece of paper on your wall and 8 years of wasted collage makes what you say about evolution the truth?

Are you more educated than Obama? Look at the shit we are in today education can't turn a monkey into a man ignorance can.


Keep in mind there are collage professors working at wall-mart today so save your horn tooting for another topic.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/33-1.jpg

collage :lol

[Blake]

I don't have to i don't support evolution. make sure you read the topic from the start.


I'm talking about the topic at the start.

You have not proven that a Scientist was lying in a text book.

All you have done is proven how silly you are.

[mouse]

Lie #4: Biogenic Law (OntogenyRecapitulates Phylogeny)

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/embryo4.jpg


Embryo drawings were used in the 20th century as evidence for the theory of common descent in discussions of biological evolution. They compared embryonal stages of certain vertebrates and vastly overemphasized the similarities. These similarities were claimed to be evidence that humans and fish evolved from a common ancestor.

The drawings were originally produced by Haeckel to illustrate his now discredited theory of Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. He was later convicted of academic fraud, but the drawings found their way into biology textbooks nevertheless.

These pictures are still in textbooks today as evidence of evolution., even though they were found to be fraudulent in the 1850’s.

In 2000, Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould called the continued use of these "fraudulent" embryo drawings the academic equivalent of murder. "We do, I think, have the right," he wrote, "to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks."




Lie # 5: Human Embryo Gill Slits


http://strattonweb.tripod.com/gill-1.gif

You can hardly attend high school or college now days with out hearing or reading this "whopper". In fact, neither gills nor their slits are found at any stage in the embryological development of any mammal including man. The folds in the neck region of the mammalian embryo, that are erroneously called "gills", are not gills in any sense of the word and never have anything to do with breathing. They are merely flexion folds, or wrinkles, in the neck region resulting from the sharply down turned head and protruding heart of the developing embryo. These folds eventually develop into a portion of the face, inner ear, tonsils, parathyroid and thymus. No reputable medical embryology text claims that there are "gill slits" in mammals.

Still, the gill slit myth is perpetuated in many high school and college biology text books as "scientific evidence" for evolution. Even Dr. Spock in his book 'Baby and Child Care' claims that "as the baby lies in the amniotic fluid of the womb, he has gills like a fish." Perhaps the "gill slit" myth continues to be taught because there is no better "evidence" for evolution. How many of you were taught the gill slit myth in school?

[mouse]

Lie # 2: Index Fossils

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/backbrown1.jpg

For years, graptolites were considered index fossils for the Ordovician period (505 to 440 Million Years Ago). However, graptolites were discovered alive and well in the south Pacific.

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/CoelArnaz66.jpg

The Coelacanth (Shown in the images to the left) was used to date layers that were 70 million years old, but they are alive and well in the Indian Ocean.

Other famous living fossils include the tuatara (supposedly extinct since the Cretaceous Period until found still living in New Zealand), the Lepidocaris crustacean (only found as fossils in Devonian rocks), the Metasequoia conifer tree (thought extinct for the past 20 million years), the Neopilina mollusk (supposedly extinct for 280 million years), the lingula brachiopod ("extinct" since the Ordovician), and even the trilobite (chief index fossil of the even more ancient Cambrian Period).

The bottom line is that if these animals are alive today, they cannot possibly be used to prove that the layer of earth they are contained in is any age. Furthermore, the fact that they remain today without any apparent change over the "millions of years" deals a hard blow to the theory of evolution.

[mouse]

Lie #1: The Geologic Column

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/geocolumn.gif



The column is supposed to represent a vertical cross-section through the earth’s crust, with the most recently deposited (therefore youngest) rocks at the surface and the oldest, earliest rocks deposited on the crystalline “basement” rocks at the bottom. If one wishes to check out this standard column (or standard geologic age system), where can he go to see it for himself? There is only one place in all the world to see the standard geologic column. That’s in the textbook! In the real world, there are of course, many layers, but in no place is the entire column represented, and in the majority of places, the layers are in the wrong order.

There are some other interesting things to note about the geologic column. Many of its layers, wherever they are found in the world, are sorted with the courser material on the bottom and the finer material on the top of that individual layer (Except in the case of underwater “slumps” where the material is sorted fine to course). Does this sorting make sense to have happened over millions of years? Sorting like this does not take place today except in specific circumstances. This kind of sorting only occurs naturally in water, and specifically in underwater mudslides called turbodites. I think it is interesting that much of the geologic column looks exactly like turboditic layering.

Other evidences indicate that the layers were layed down rapidly, underwater rather than slowly over millions of years. All over the world, trees are found petrified, standing up, running through several "ages". If these layers really represent ages, we must either accept that the tree stood for millions of years, while the layers slowly built up around the tree, or that the tree grew up through millions of years of rock in search of sunlight.

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/polytree.jpg

In recent history, we had a very powerful demonstration of how layers are formed rapidly through a catastrophe. When Mount St. Helens erupted, it devastated the surrounding area. In this area, many layers of sediment were deposited rapidly, and in many layers. Several canyons were formed by the mud flows, all with features that look remarkably like the Grand Canyon in miniature. Trees were blasted off the face of the mountain, and many of them ended up floating on Spirit lake. Over a short time, as the trees became waterlogged, the began to sink vertically, and become embedded in the mud at the bottom of the lake. The trees here are sinking through many soft layers of material. This process shows a much more likely scenario for the explanation of polystrate tree fossils.

One last note on the geologic column: The ages of the rocks in the column are identified by the index fossils they contain. The fossils are dated by the layers of rock they are in. This is circular reasoning. In recent years, scientists have made the claim that the rocks are dated using radiometric dating, but the truth is that the dates of the layers vary wildly, and any dates that do not conform to the geologic column are regarded as "flawed" and not used.

[clambake]

is this thread about god?

[mouse]

collage :lol

Figured that would go over your head. All that education you speak of and all you have is a LOL icon as a reply. Pathetic and yet expected.

Lie #3: Microevolution Proves Macroevolution

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/micromacro.gif

Our textbooks point out many examples of microevolution, which is really just a slight variation, and claim that this is proof of macroevolution - the change from one kind of animal to another.

The truth is, variations exist, but there are limits. Nowhere on earth, or in the fossil record have we ever seen any evidence of one kind of animal giving rise to another. I would agree that the wolf and the dog, and the coyote probably have a common ancestor - a dog. However, you can cross-breed memners of the dog kind for as long as you want, and you will never get anything other than a dog.

"The fact is that the evidence was so patchy one hundred years ago that even Darwin himself had increasing doubts as to the validity of his views, and the only aspect of his theory which has received any support over the past century is where it applies to microevolutionary phenomena. His general theory, that all life on earth had originated and evolved by a gradual successive accumulation of fortuitous mutations, is still, as it was in Darwin's time, a highly speculative hypothesis entirely without direct factual support and very far from that self-evident axiom some of its more aggressive advocates would have us believe."—*Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1986), p. 77.

[mouse]

Lie #6: Horse Evolution

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/HorseEvolution.gif

Above is a chart that is used to show the various stages of horse evolution. This is shown as evidence of transitional forms. Here's what two of the experts say on the subject:

Dr. G.S. McLean: "The chart is assembled from fossils found in India, South America, North America and Europe, then arranged in a neat sequential order of size, the smallest to the largest. There is no proof whatsoever that one member of the chart has evolved into another."

"Darwin... was embarrassed by the fossil record... we are now about 120-years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn't changed much. The record of evolution is still surprisingly jerky and, ironically, ... some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information."

David M. Raup, Curator of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago; "Conflicts between Darwin and paleontology" Field Museum of Natural History, vol.50, no. 1, Jan 1979, p.25

These are the basic facts about the supposed horse evolution series:

1. The horse series was constructed from fossils found in many different parts of the world and nowhere does this succession occur in one location. The series is formulated on the assumption of evolutionary progression, and then used to 'prove' evolution!
2. The number of ribs varies within the series, up and down, between 15, 19 and 18. The number of lumbar vertebrae also changes from six to eight and then back to six.
3. Fossils of the three-toed and one-toed species are preserved in the same rock formation in Nebraska, proving that both lived at the same time, strongly suggesting that one did not evolve into the other (National Geographic, January 1981, p. 74)

[mouse]

Anyone with at least an 8th grade education reading this topic can clearly see who produced the evidence, and who just merely resorted to weak comebacks.
My work in done here.

[Blake]

Lie #4: Biogenic Law (OntogenyRecapitulates Phylogeny)

http://strattonweb.tripod.com/embryo4.jpg


Embryo drawings were used in the 20th century as evidence for the theory of common descent in discussions of biological evolution. They compared embryonal stages of certain vertebrates and vastly overemphasized the similarities. These similarities were claimed to be evidence that humans and fish evolved from a common ancestor.

The drawings were originally produced by Haeckel to illustrate his now discredited theory of Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. He was later convicted of academic fraud, but the drawings found their way into biology textbooks nevertheless.

These pictures are still in textbooks today as evidence of evolution., even though they were found to be fraudulent in the 1850’s.

In 2000, Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould called the continued use of these "fraudulent" embryo drawings the academic equivalent of murder. "We do, I think, have the right," he wrote, "to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks."


Gould was a noted evolutionary biologist :lol

What textbook today is currently using Haeckel's phony illustrations?

[Agloco]

Don't mix radiation with evolution. If that's the case didn't you say last year the Mavs would never win a Championship ring?

Shit happens. Kinda like snails happen eh mouse?

[Halberto]

Anyone with at least an 8th grade education reading this topic can clearly see who produced the evidence, and who just merely resorted to weak comebacks.
My work in done here.

Exactly. You haven't proved anything and ignore any debate. 8th graders are smart enough to side with the geologist and physicist.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Mouse? is this nihilism of yours even somewhat legit?

[LnGrrrR]

Why does anyone still respond to Mouse?

[mouse]

It's one thing to run someone off the radio but to disable the hotlinks to the pictures is borderline Marshall law.

Let me search old 1999 Hard drive pictures and host them online myself to better explain my replies.

[mouse]

Exactly. You haven't proved anything and ignore any debate. 8th graders are smart enough to side with the geologist and physicist.

..........^ Another wasted post. No info..... No updates......and .. No proof...

Sometimes kicking ass in a debate can become quit boring at times.

[admiralsnackbar]

Why does anyone still respond to Mouse?

The 8-hr work day.

[mouse]

Why does anyone still respond to Mouse?




Look in the mirror a keep asking.


Think how much info I have access too before you put your crusty foot in your mouth.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/cray2.gif

[mouse]

The 8-hr work day.


Who the hell you know actually works "8" hours a day?




Next time you decide to engage in a debate with me make sure you do your research.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/9.jpg

[admiralsnackbar]

Who the hell you know actually works "8" hours a day?


Everyone I know, unless they happen to work longer. Maybe one day I'll get to be one of the idle rich (or the idle, self-promoting poor).


Next time you decide to engage in a debate with me make sure you do your research.

Noted.

[Agloco]

My point exactly. I am calling out Scientist who have more education than you, you think a piece of paper on your wall and 8 years of wasted collage makes what you say about evolution the truth?

No. Years of experimental/field research and literature review in relevant fields do that.

Now I suppose you'll tell me that a few months of you-tubing, 3 childrens books on snails, a 6-pack of Corona and a dime bag qualify you to do the same?

[Vici]

I don't know why y'all bother. He's clearly very lonely and can only satisfy himself by trolling.

[Blake]

What textbook today is currently using Haeckel's phony illustrations?

[Halberto]

Now I suppose you'll tell me that a few months of you-tubing, 3 childrens books on snails, a 6-pack of Corona and a dime bag qualify you to do the same?

No, you forgot the mike's hard lemonade.

[mouse]

Noted.



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/222-4.jpg

[Blake]

mouse: What textbook today is currently using Haeckel's phony illustrations?

[admiralsnackbar]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/222-4.jpg
The resemblance is uncanny.

[mouse]

All this so-called educated posters and yet no replies worth reading why is that?

[mouse]

I challenge any of you to a live debate on this subject.......

[Halberto]

Lie #1: The Geologic Column

The column is supposed to represent a vertical cross-section through the earth’s crust, with the most recently deposited (therefore youngest) rocks at the surface and the oldest, earliest rocks deposited on the crystalline “basement” rocks at the bottom. If one wishes to check out this standard column (or standard geologic age system), where can he go to see it for himself? There is only one place in all the world to see the standard geologic column. That’s in the textbook! In the real world, there are of course, many layers, but in no place is the entire column represented, and in the majority of places, the layers are in the wrong order.

There are some other interesting things to note about the geologic column. Many of its layers, wherever they are found in the world, are sorted with the courser material on the bottom and the finer material on the top of that individual layer (Except in the case of underwater “slumps” where the material is sorted fine to course). Does this sorting make sense to have happened over millions of years? Sorting like this does not take place today except in specific circumstances. This kind of sorting only occurs naturally in water, and specifically in underwater mudslides called turbodites. I think it is interesting that much of the geologic column looks exactly like turboditic layering.

Other evidences indicate that the layers were layed down rapidly, underwater rather than slowly over millions of years. All over the world, trees are found petrified, standing up, running through several "ages". If these layers really represent ages, we must either accept that the tree stood for millions of years, while the layers slowly built up around the tree, or that the tree grew up through millions of years of rock in search of sunlight.


Lol at everything here.

"No one has ever seen an entire geologic column."

I don't know what they're trying to get at here. If its that we haven't seen an exposed crystalline basement before, then they haven't been to Enchanted Rock. If they're saying we haven't seen past the crystalline basement, well no shit! You'd be exposed to the mantle, and you wouldn't be happy. We know the mantle is there through simple wave motion, chemistry and seams/holes on the ocean floor. With this logic, you could say you don't believe in the air you breathe.

"This kind of sorting only occurs naturally in water, and specifically in underwater mudslides called turbodites. I think it is interesting that much of the geologic column looks exactly like turboditic layering."

Wrong again dummy.

Volcanic debris settles with coarser grains first, this is called reverse grading. Not only that, many formations can be flipped over when thrusting occurs. These overturned units can be seen all over the world, and I have seen it first hand in Wyoming.

"Other evidences indicate that the layers were layed down rapidly, underwater rather than slowly over millions of years. All over the world, trees are found petrified, standing up, running through several "ages". If these layers really represent ages, we must either accept that the tree stood for millions of years, while the layers slowly built up around the tree, or that the tree grew up through millions of years of rock in search of sunlight."

I'd like to see an example of this.


Lastly, I don't understand why they keep referring to a singular geologic column.... it changes with location.


There you go mouse. Pick my education apart.

Btw, I got the job. :greedy

[Agloco]

All this so-called educated posters and yet no replies worth reading why is that?

My guess? We've considered the source.



Btw, I got the job. :greedy

:tu

[RandomGuy]

Why does anyone still respond to Mouse?

Not really sure. It is kinda fun to show how dumb some of the shit he comes up with is. Hell I would almost say it is an art form by now.

"Look kids, can you find all the things wrong with this statement?"

Kind of like an I Spy book of stupidity.

When my boys get old enough to learn this stuff, I will be using them as examples of bad science and logic. That and Yonivores stuff.

[RandomGuy]

Lol at everything here.

"No one has ever seen an entire geologic column."

I don't know what they're trying to get at here. If its that we haven't seen an exposed crystalline basement before, then they haven't been to Enchanted Rock. If they're saying we haven't seen past the crystalline basement, well no shit! You'd be exposed to the mantle, and you wouldn't be happy. We know the mantle is there through simple wave motion, chemistry and seams/holes on the ocean floor. With this logic, you could say you don't believe in the air you breathe.

"This kind of sorting only occurs naturally in water, and specifically in underwater mudslides called turbodites. I think it is interesting that much of the geologic column looks exactly like turboditic layering."

Wrong again dummy.

Volcanic debris settles with coarser grains first, this is called reverse grading. Not only that, many formations can be flipped over when thrusting occurs. These overturned units can be seen all over the world, and I have seen it first hand in Wyoming.

"Other evidences indicate that the layers were layed down rapidly, underwater rather than slowly over millions of years. All over the world, trees are found petrified, standing up, running through several "ages". If these layers really represent ages, we must either accept that the tree stood for millions of years, while the layers slowly built up around the tree, or that the tree grew up through millions of years of rock in search of sunlight."

I'd like to see an example of this.


Lastly, I don't understand why they keep referring to a singular geologic column.... it changes with location.


There you go mouse. Pick my education apart.

Btw, I got the job. :greedy

The geologic column schtick was debunked years ago.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD102.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood-gc.html#G4c

That doesn't keep the ignorant from copy/pasting them ad nauseum.

Honestly, idiots who don't understand science, and have never done any real science will always find reasons to doubt the experts who spend their lives studying it.

Mouse reminds me of ICP.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=219&pictureid=1641

[mouse]

Lol at everything here.

"No one has ever seen an entire geologic column."

Then why is a picture of it in the collage books?

http://creationwiki.org/pool/images/thumb/2/28/Geo_time.JPG/400px-Geo_time.JPG
Do you not comprehend my point? Did you enter this topic ,skim over the postings and Geological coullum think I am defending young earth or creation?

I don't do neither. I point out Lies in the textbooks.

If no one has seen the geological column then how did it get in the textbooks how did the pictures get done, who drew them, and doesn't that make it really with no "Scientific" proof a fairy tail?
That's what the kids have Dr. Seuss.




But truth is if you have a hard time figuring out where I am coming then further replies will be wasted time.


Psssst! but a quick heads up the Theory in which they support time and fossils is circular reasoning at best.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-240637.png

How do I know Spider man is real? Super Man told me.

How do I know Super Man is real? Spider man told me.



Lastly, I don't understand why they keep referring to a singular geologic column.... it changes with location.




I thought you just said no one has seen it. [/quote]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-243756.png

[Halberto]

:lol

I've done what you asked mouse. I've corrected one of your idiotic claims and you ignore most of it. I don't have the time to explain every facet of geology to you.

Take care.

[mouse]

Take care.


Translation:
I am out of my league exit now.

[Halberto]

Mouse you're copy and pasting arguments from a creationist website :lmao

http://creationwiki.org/Geological_column


:lmao

[The Reckoning]

^ lol

mouse's trolling has become desperation now.

[Agloco]

Mouse you're copy and pasting arguments from a creationist website :lmao

http://creationwiki.org/Geological_column


:lmao

lol creationists

BS5vid4GkEY

Great series made by a fellow scientist.

[RandomGuy]

Then why is a picture of it in the collage books?

http://creationwiki.org/pool/images/thumb/2/28/Geo_time.JPG/400px-Geo_time.JPG
Do you not comprehend my point? Did you enter this topic ,skim over the postings and Geological coullum think I am defending young earth or creation?

I don't do neither. I point out Lies in the textbooks.

If no one has seen the geological column then how did it get in the textbooks how did the pictures get done, who drew them, and doesn't that make it really with no "Scientific" proof a fairy tail?
That's what the kids have Dr. Seuss.

But truth is if you have a hard time figuring out where I am coming then further replies will be wasted time.


Psssst! but a quick heads up the Theory in which they support time and fossils is circular reasoning at best.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-240637.png

How do I know Spider man is real? Super Man told me.

How do I know Super Man is real? Spider man told me.




How do I know Creationist website A is telling me the truth? Creationist website B told me.

How do I know Creationist website B is telling me the truth? Creationist website A told me.


You might not share their belief in Jesus, but you buy their young earth stupidity, hook, line, and sinker.

[Halberto]

Where is mouse?

[redzero]

mouse gets owned like this all the time. He is incapable of feeling embarrassment though, since he will keep using the exact same arguments over and over again, no matter how many times they've been dismantled.

[LnGrrrR]

If I had to pick just one person to ban on this forum, it would assuredly be mouse, who literally brings nothing to any conversation. If intelligence were a temperature, he'd be a few degrees colder than absolute zero.

[Wild Cobra]

If I had to pick just one person to ban on this forum, it would assuredly be mouse, who literally brings nothing to any conversation. If intelligence were a temperature, he'd be a few degrees colder than absolute zero.
What a freezer burn.

[RandomGuy]

If I had to pick just one person to ban on this forum, it would assuredly be mouse, who literally brings nothing to any conversation. If intelligence were a temperature, he'd be a few degrees colder than absolute zero.

I dunno. mouse is a fairly nice guy for the most part. He isn't an abusive jackass like some, and although he believes in a lot of stupid shit, he isn't too obnoxious about it.

In my old age I have gotten a lot more sanguine about such things. Message boards are like a sort of intellectual ecosystem, with lots of niches to fill.

[mouse]

If I had to pick just one person to ban on this forum, it would assuredly be mouse, who literally brings nothing


You need me to bring something?
Psssssst! this is a message board, not a pot luck dinner.
You want a place were people bring something go to your sister's baby shower a few months after the tractor pull hits your town.

lets see what you bring to ST



Posted By LnGrrrR
Re: What would your tax plan be?



Who the fuck do you hang out with? Amish people? Who the fuck would have time to sew their own goddamned clothes? Some people are fucking idiots.




Posted By LnGrrrR
Re: Gotham Rogues vs Patriots game thread

Fuck you defense.




Posted By LnGrrrR
Re: Kool... And This Whole Monkey Business Shit

Weird to see Luva pretending to be ignorant, instead of his normal just beig ignorant




Posted By LnGrrrR
Re: 112 Cruise missiles - What a mistake

"Only"

:lmao :lmao :lmao





Ducks, fabbs, where you at dawgs?


those are only on the last page who's knows what Gems lie in his infinite wisdom.

click here for more...

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/search.php?searchid=3144559&pp=25&page=12



The Irony



Posted By LnGrrrR
Why does anyone still respond to Mouse?









If intelligence were a temperature, he'd be a few degrees colder than absolute zero.

And yet you reply.

[Halberto]

Hey mouse, why are you using material from a creationist website?

[bus driver]

is this a serious thread? :wtf

[Borat Sagyidev]

Then why is a picture of it in the collage books?

http://creationwiki.org/pool/images/thumb/2/28/Geo_time.JPG/400px-Geo_time.JPG
Do you not comprehend my point? Did you enter this topic ,skim over the postings and Geological coullum think I am defending young earth or creation?

I don't do neither. I point out Lies in the textbooks.

If no one has seen the geological column then how did it get in the textbooks how did the pictures get done, who drew them, and doesn't that make it really with no "Scientific" proof a fairy tail?
That's what the kids have Dr. Seuss.




But truth is if you have a hard time figuring out where I am coming then further replies will be wasted time.


Psssst! but a quick heads up the Theory in which they support time and fossils is circular reasoning at best.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-240637.png

How do I know Spider man is real? Super Man told me.

How do I know Super Man is real? Spider man told me.




I thought you just said no one has seen it.

[/QUOTE]

http://www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/954-not-sure-if-serious.jpg

[Halberto]

http://creationwiki.org/Main_Page

Mouse, is this the unlimited source of knowledge you were referring to? It's been more than 3 days since you've posted in here...

Interpretation: "I am out of my league exit now."

Or maybe you've got a bad hangover from drinking all those mike's hard lemonades.

[mouse]

http://creationwiki.org/Main_Page

Mouse, is this the unlimited source of knowledge you were referring to?


Your right I should only use material from books I personally wrote myself.

Are you serious you never borrowed a quote or a photo from a site? I used Google to find pictures and quotes I need if you are upset with the results go after Google not me.


It's been more than 3 days since you've posted in here...


Maybe because its been over 7 days since anyone said anything worth commenting too. By the way when have you said anything pertaining to this topic?



Interpretation: "I am out of my league exit now."


Your right trading insults with someone still using outdated smack is way out of my league. Have fun with your Bush league pals.


Or maybe you've got a bad hangover from drinking all those mike's hard lemonades.

case in point.

I am not working tonight so anyone with any intelligence in this matter feel free to try and get this topic back on track and I may return.

[Halberto]

worst troll ever

Do you realize that "outdated smack" was a direct quote from you just days ago....?


Also, please learn the differences between your/you're and to/too.... but that might require you read a textbook.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

worst troll ever

Do you realize that "outdated smack" was a direct quote from you just days ago....?


Also, please learn the differences between your/you're and to/too.... but that might require you read a textbook.

i disagree. mouse is perhaps the greatest internet troll I have ever encountered. I am sure that he has some Luddite tendencies but not too much yet hes strung you guys on with this for months.

[redzero]

Only thing mouse is good at is making himself look like a dumbass know-it-all. He isn't funny and he tries too hard.

He's a terrible troll, unless this conspiracy theorist moron thing is actually a troll job.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Only thing mouse is good at is making himself look like a dumbass know-it-all. He isn't funny and he tries too hard.

He's a terrible troll, unless this conspiracy theorist moron thing is actually a troll job.

He is just about as earnest in being a Mavs fan as he is in this diatribe here. All of it gets people going. He knows how to push buttons. I think its hilarious.

[redzero]

He would be great troll if he actually didn't honestly believe what he was posting.

But I guess it is hard to discern between an idiot who doesn't know what he was talking about and a guy pretending to be an idiot who doesn't know what he is talking about.

[mouse]

He would be great troll if he actually didn't honestly believe what he was posting.

.


^ Still doesn't get it.


And from looking at his post count he never will.

8GtfyHvdLmg


major props to FuzzyLumpkins...... he showed he had my back... and mouse never forgets...........

[LnGrrrR]

Mouse, I meant I don't know why anyone responds to you as if you'd argue fairly. I fully understand why people would respond to you to call you a moron.

[mouse]

Mouse, I meant I don't know why anyone responds to you as if you'd argue fairly. I fully understand why people would respond to you to call you a moron.


Link?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/66666666-1.jpg

[LnGrrrR]

Link?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/66666666-1.jpg

A perfect example of your reading and comprehension skills, as well as your ability to communicate effectively. Thank you.

[redzero]

Typical dumbass mouse claiming some deeper meaning in his posts when there aren't any.

You love trying to spin around the entire board shitting on your retarded posts into some kind of victory.

[mouse]

Anyone with any intelligence in this matter feel free to try and get this topic back on track and I may return.

[redzero]

:lmao As soon as mouse encounters somebody who knows what they are talking about, he disappears.

It's funny that he no longer wants to "educate" people when he starts to lose an argument.

[LnGrrrR]

Anyone with any intelligence in this matter please feel free to explain to me what that is.

[mouse]

:lmao As soon as mouse encounters somebody who knows what they are talking about, he disappears.

It's funny that he no longer wants to "educate" people when he starts to lose an argument.

Show the quote where I am "losing the argument" It's just you and your skateboard pal Grrrr hurling outdated insults.

Maybe you haven't read the "entire" topic. Truth is...It really wouldn't matter if you and your sexually frustrated buddy GRrr decided to actually stay on topic and join the debate, your reputation as serous poster with an education has been ruined after your 5th post here at ST.

Two bored teen boys with no girlfriends never do well in subjects like these.

have you tried the NBA forum?

[mouse]

anyone with any intelligence in this matter feel free to try and get this topic back on track and I may return.

[LnGrrrR]

:lol Outdated insults
:lol Calling me a skateboarding, sexually frustrated teen
:lol Mouse being the failiest fail that ever failed

[SmacktheTrolls]

i disagree. mouse is perhaps the greatest internet troll I have ever encountered. I am sure that he has some Luddite tendencies but not too much yet hes strung you guys on with this for months.

:tu :lmao

[redzero]

:lol mouse now bringing out his trolls for a circle jerk
:lol know-it-all bum
:lol tries to be condescending to others but can't even use proper English

[mouse]

:lol Outdated insults
:lol Calling me a skateboarding, sexually frustrated teen
:lol Mouse being the failiest fail that ever failed


:lol LnGrrrR Avoiding staying on topic.
:lol LnGrrrR Showing everyone he stalks and is immature.
:lol LnGrrrR Gets his ass kicked daily in the NBA forum so he hangs in the politics forum.

[mouse]

anyone with any intelligence in this matter feel free to try and get this topic back on track and I may return.


Day 4 and still no adults?

[redzero]

Why are you responding to my posts with attacks on LnGrrrR?

:lol you of all people calling anybody immature.

"Hey guys, look at this hilarious pic I photoshopped! What, you don't find it funny? I'll just keep posting it until you do!"

[mouse]

Anyone besides Mo Larry and Curly posting tonight?

[LnGrrrR]

:lol LnGrrrR Avoiding staying on topic.
:lol LnGrrrR Showing everyone he stalks and is immature.
:lol LnGrrrR Gets his ass kicked daily in the NBA forum so he hangs in the politics forum.

The topic throughout this entire thread is that you're an idiot. Pay attention.

Feel free to point out where I "got my ass kicked" in the NBA forum. And stalking? :lol You live in a strange world mouse.

[LnGrrrR]

We'd respond to the OP, but we know you'd just use your retarded "One book has snails turning into humans!!!" logic.

[m>s]

a scientist lying in text books? the scientist the caller referred to must be a chink im guessing maybe the scientist himself didn't see nothing unlawful or unmoral at all in his behavior, such cheating acts would've been fine in his motherland in fact most "scientists" have been doing just the same there and get away with it, dude must be used to cheating imho.

yeah american taxpayers please keep donating your hard-earned $ to the government to import more and more frauds into our country, funding their living cost & education cost so they can outcompete our own kids in the new workforce, and the immigrants who turn teachers will transform the kids all into dumbasses just like they themselves are.

[Leetonidas]

Your move brah!

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/chump2.jpg


Two known facts:

A: I don't lecture people, I try to educate them.

B: I don't want to waste time educating the ignorant.

Don't go were you may want to come the same..........


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/Mallen-Blue-2.gif

This is so insanely retarded it's not even funny :bang

[Vici]

You gotta realize that's the point... at least I hope for his sake it's intentional.

At some point in Mouse's young life he realized that no one would take him seriously. His parents probably completely ignored him and he figured the only way he would get attention would be if he acted out and "trolled" his parents. Clearly this thinking has extended into his very late adult life where to this day people choose to ignore him in his everyday life. His revenge is to go on as many message boards and talk shows possible to say the most retarded, asinine things he can come up with... Hoping, praying that someone will show him some attention.

I admit that I read his threads, but not because of mouse, but because of the idiots who continue to post on his threads. As one of my childhood heroes once said, "Who's more the fool? The fool or the fool who follows the fool?".

[redzero]

This is so insanely retarded it's not even funny :bang

"Hey guys, look at this hilarious pic I photoshopped! What, you don't find it funny? I'll just keep posting it until you do!"

That's what mouse does; he keeps posting the same unfunny pictures over and over again in a sad attempt to illicit a laugh.

[mouse]

The topic throughout this entire thread is that you're an idiot.


Not to be rude but...
I would like opinions from people with real jobs who can buy cigarettes without showing a fake ID and have some knowledge of this topic before I take your word for it.


Pay attention.


or else?




Feel free to point out where I "got my ass kicked" in the NBA forum.

Translation: Take time away from your daily activity and boost my ego as you be my bitch and do as I say? Psssst!....That's your job to prove you know about Science and try and prove to others you have a girlfriend and can buy cigarettes legally not mine esse.

I am not here to babysit you.






And stalking? :lol

Let the readers decide this one.





You live in a strange world mouse.

And what is so not strange about yours?


But don't worry brah.........











your















still














http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/222-5.jpg

[mouse]

This is so insanely retarded it's not even funny :bang

But...

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/c14Mollusk.jpg

[Blake]

What text book has lies in it?

[LnGrrrR]

lol Mouse failing all over the place

lol Mouse's airport security job much more "real" than me being in the military

lol Mouse a dangerous psychopath

[mouse]

What text book has lies in it?

Science and Biology books grades 2-12

College also.

One example

Plate Tectonics
Textbook sections on this subject need to be read with caution. While it is true that the earth has several "plates" that are moving and causing earthquakes, volcanoes, etc., it cannot be proven that they have been moving for millions of years. The Pangea theory teaches that all the continents broke apart 200 million years ago. They show students how the continents seem to fit.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/continents.jpg


Things the textbooks do not tell you:

1. Africa has been shrunk 40% for the drawings

2. Mexico and Central America are gone

3. Europe and South America have been rotated counterclockwise and Africa clockwise.

Textbooks often show pictures of the ocean floor in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and say that there is evidence of magnetic reversals down there.42 This is simply not true. There are areas of weaker and stronger magnetism, but there is no place on the ocean floor where a north-seeking compass will point south.

[redzero]

This bum is lifting this crap directly from a creationist website without changing anything at all. :lol

http://www.fillthevoid.org/Creation/Hovind/Brainwashed.html

:lol claiming that you are intelligent
:lol using creationist bullshit as your only source

[LnGrrrR]

lol Hovind

[Blake]

Science and Biology books grades 2-12

College also.

One example

Plate Tectonics
Textbook sections on this subject need to be read with caution. While it is true that the earth has several "plates" that are moving and causing earthquakes, volcanoes, etc., it cannot be proven that they have been moving for millions of years. The Pangea theory teaches that all the continents broke apart 200 million years ago. They show students how the continents seem to fit.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/continents.jpg


what text book specifically are you referring to?

[Blake]

This bum is lifting this crap directly from a creationist website without changing anything at all. :lol

http://www.fillthevoid.org/Creation/Hovind/Brainwashed.html

:lol claiming that you are intelligent
:lol using creationist bullshit as your only source

it's been his m.o. as far back as I can remember

he's just fucking around

[boutons_deux]

Mouse is actually too smart to believe his shitty position. He's being a provocateur, a troll.

[RandomGuy]

You gotta realize that's the point... at least I hope for his sake it's intentional.

At some point in Mouse's young life he realized that no one would take him seriously. His parents probably completely ignored him and he figured the only way he would get attention would be if he acted out and "trolled" his parents. Clearly this thinking has extended into his very late adult life where to this day people choose to ignore him in his everyday life. His revenge is to go on as many message boards and talk shows possible to say the most retarded, asinine things he can come up with... Hoping, praying that someone will show him some attention.

I admit that I read his threads, but not because of mouse, but because of the idiots who continue to post on his threads. As one of my childhood heroes once said, "Who's more the fool? The fool or the fool who follows the fool?".


"Who's the more foolish, the fool, or the fool who follows him?"

[Blake]

Mouse is actually too smart to believe his shitty position.

debatable

[redzero]

Mouse isn't smart enough to know the difference between "you're" and "your," so don't give him too much credit.

[Agloco]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/continents.jpg



Well, how about these continents mouse? Do they appear to fit together at all?

[baseline bum]

lol Hovind

They let that dickhead post from prison?

[LnGrrrR]

They let that dickhead post from prison?

It's always a good idea to base your arguments off a guy who's in jail... for fraud.

[Agloco]

It's always a good idea to base your arguments off a guy who's in jail... for fraud.

lol its just the same as these people who attempt to debunk relativity with semantics. Their messiah is a convicted industrial spy.

[mouse]

Well, how about these continents mouse? Do they appear to fit together at all?

Never been big on doing puzzles all I know if they did fit toggether it wasn't 4 billion years ago.

[mouse]

lol its just the same as these people who attempt to debunk relativity with semantics. Their messiah is a convicted industrial spy.

Martha Stewart went to prison also doen't mean she can't teach you how to bake a pie.

[Halberto]

Im so happy that 5 years of studying lies has landed me a great paying job that I love.

[mouse]

Im so happy that 5 years of studying lies has landed me a great paying job that I love.

check stub?


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/vlcsnap-263295.png

[Blake]

lol 1994 and 1998

[mouse]

lol 1994 and 1998

lol 1839 and 1875


http://just-write.contentquake.com/files/2009/11/darwin.jpg

[Blake]

lol 1839 and 1875


http://just-write.contentquake.com/files/2009/11/darwin.jpg

Lmao exactly.

Let me know when you find a public school book from some time this decade.

[mouse]

Lmao exactly.

Let me know when you find a public school book from some time this decade.

Lmao exactly.

Let me know when you find a prof of evolution book from some time this decade.

[mouse]

Let me know when you find a public school book from some time this decade.

December 7, 2010

http://ncse.com/news/2010/12/biology-textbooks-approved-louisiana-006357


2011
Victory for evolution in Texas, National Center for Science Education, 22 July 2011, Retrieved 23 July 2011


http://ncse.com/news/2011/07/victory-evolution-texas-006802

[mouse]

21 June 2006.

http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/images/taens2.jpg

Today many school students are shielded from one of the most important concepts in modern science: evolution. In engaging and conversational style, Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science provides a well-structured framework for understanding and teaching evolution.

[mouse]

2010

Textbook company official: “We teach evolution, and we teach it to the Sunshine State standards.”
Leslie Postal, Science education

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_education_edblog/2010/10/textbook-company-official-we-teach-evolution-and-we-teach-it-to-the-sunshine-state-standards.html



http://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/6868595-L.jpg

[mouse]

2008

Teaching biological evolution in higher education
http://i43.tower.com/images/mm100993755/teaching-biological-evolution-in-higher-education-methodological-religious-brian-j-alters-paperback-cover-art.jpg


2009

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51Axg1vum5L._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2008
http://ca.pbsstatic.com/l/10/1410/9781933531410.jpg

[Halberto]

check stub?

You want me to post my pay check???

[Blake]

Great mouse. Now let us know exactly which lies in those books that you've exposed.

[RandomGuy]

Great mouse. Now let us know exactly which lies in those books that you've exposed.

None. He is just trolling a bunch of shit not even he believes.

Trying to get him to define what it is he himself believes is like pulling teeth, mostly because he knows somewhere, deep down where he doesn't like to look, that what he believes is not supported by anything that approaches evidence.

Best I can recall of the point where he finally fessed up, was "aliens or something created earth and stuff not very long ago, and certainly not billions of years ago". I don't think he has any real coherent beliefs on the subject.

[mouse]

You want me to post my pay check???

How about a photo of your car tittle, or you with a female?

And as you get those think what does this have to do with the topic.

[mouse]

None. He is just trolling
Unless RandomLie is the name on your birth certificate your a TRoll also. In fact we are all TRolling.

Why is that so difficult for the little brains to comprehend?

[Blake]

Unless RandomLie is the name on your birth certificate your a TRoll also. In fact we are all TRolling.

Why is that so difficult for the little brains to comprehend?

man exposes himself lying in his thread.