If you don't vaccinate your children, you are a horrible parent. Period

[tholdren]

:jack

That isn't a link, and it isn't evidence. That is you claiming something.

You still suck at this.
Already linked the cdc report to you last month. You couldn't read it because you dont understand what the numbers mean. Lololo

You flip flop and gossip every week. Lolololokil

Almost as dumb as ChumpDumper and his numerous inaccuracies. Kansas, furloughs, ships, fatality rate, spike, ships, hospital, wet markets, timely data, surge, protests, 2 weeks.

That's a lot of gossip. You even listed hospitals. Veahahahhahahhahahah you

[RandomGuy]

claims without evidence. If you had the evidence you would post it. Repeatedly. It's like you don't want someone to look at your underlying assumptions.

That is dishonest.

You still suck at this.

some more.


weeks ago the cdc reported the ifr as 2x flu. You arent smart.

Another claim without evidence. more :jack

Tell you what, not putting you on ignore, but i am simply going to pass on responding to your lazy posts, unless you provide links to back up your claims.

Fuck even with 9-11 twoofers had links. You gotta work hard to fall short of that standard.

[RandomGuy]

Wow. I just came across this. Check it out.


Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6wudTuFr35ZP/


I didn't make it green. What's going on?



Why look at that.
Even the resident nutbar can find some source material to link.

Had any luck proving your batshit theory about the moon landings yet? :rollin

[RandomGuy]

Hey RandomGuy

You never responded to post #484.
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=203274&page=20&p=10166993&viewfull=1#post10166993
(https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=203274&page=20&p=10166993&viewfull=1#post10166993)

Here's some more info you should check out if you purport to have an opinion on the issue.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1361194&viewfull=1#post1361194

If You Think Your Kid's Vaccines are Safe, DON'T Watch This!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsZbVg6vmVs

What needs responding, in your own words?

[tholdren]

Another claim without evidence. more :jack

Tell you what, not putting you on ignore, but i am simply going to pass on responding to your lazy posts, unless you provide links to back up your claims.

Fuck even with 9-11 twoofers had links. You gotta work hard to fall short of that standard.

Cdc report in May that you cant read

[RandomGuy]

Cdc report in May that you cant read

I really can't read your support if you don't post the link to it. Sorry, can't read minds.

:lol less work than the resident moon landing denier.

[RandomGuy]

The shills working this forum gave up because they were looking like horses' a---s during the whole discussion.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-latest-moon-hoax-documentary.163196/

(http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-latest-moon-hoax-documentary.163196/)sciforums (dot) com/threads/the-latest-moon-hoax-documentary (dot) 163196/
(http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-latest-moon-hoax-documentary.163196/)





I'll copy and paste what I said in post #484.


Have you watched this video?

You're behaving like a checkmated disinfo agent* who doesn't even believe his own arguments. Stop playing games and answer the question.


*
http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html
http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
https://cultureofawareness.com/2012/09/26/disinformation-campaign-exposure-confessions-of-a-paid-disinformation-poster/

An easy question.

I have not watched your video.

I did watch Vaxxed though. It was horrendously bad.

Is there something specific you are trying to get to?

[tholdren]

I really can't read your support if you don't post the link to it. Sorry, can't read minds.

:lol less work than the resident moon landing denier.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

5th time posting sad to be you. Your math skills are hialrIous.

[RandomGuy]

RG, do you have kids?

Two. 17 and 14

[RandomGuy]

Vaxxed is the video I referred to.


You're being a little unclear. Are you saying it showed that the new vaccines can cause autism and other bad stuff which is bad, or are you saying you don't agree with the point the makers of the documentary are making?


Watch part 2 and tell us whether you think the new vaccines can have horrible side effects.

Vaxxed II: The People's Truth (2019)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1RAAGIgNLeJU/

You should ask tholdren. He is very scientific, and will tell you all about vaccines and autism, I'm sure.

[SnakeBoy]

Two. 17 and 14

If a Covid-19 vaccine is approved by the end of the year will you put your children first in line to get it?

[tholdren]

You should ask tholdren. He is very scientific, and will tell you all about vaccines and autism, I'm sure.
Yes I am. Thank you for leaving the science and math to the experts. Don't known enough about Vax to comment.

[RandomGuy]

weeks ago the cdc reported the ifr as 2x flu. You arent smart.

[link? several times over]


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

5th time posting sad to be you. Your math skills are hialrIous.

Honestly, at this point in your "LOL"s I am finding it hard to find what point you are trying to make specfically.

Your point appears to be that according to a planning document, based on some spitball assumptions (based on data recieved before the end of April), the R-0 is two times the flu, although there is no specific comparison in the link to the flu rate for this year.

So what?

[RandomGuy]

If a Covid-19 vaccine is approved by the end of the year will you put your children first in line to get it?

Sure, if it is approved. Seems reasonable to do so, Cosmored's flagellating aside.

[RandomGuy]

Yes I am. Thank you for leaving the science and math to the experts. Don't known enough about Vax to comment.

Just watch his links man. He will tell you all about it. You just need to do your research.

[tholdren]

Just watch his links man. He will tell you all about it. You just need to do your research.
I'm not interested in it. So I won't. But that also means I won't comment on it, because that would be gossip.

[RandomGuy]

All I can say is checkmate. All the viewers can see that you're a disinfo agent. I don't see how you people can sleep.

Checkmate, sure. Tell tholdren all about it. I'm too far gone, you may be able to help him.

[RandomGuy]

I'm not interested in it. So I won't. But that also means I won't comment on it, because that would be gossip.

That's because you haven't done your research like ol' Cosmored. You don't want to tip your hand about being a fellow shill. I get it. Shhhhhh

[tholdren]

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

5th time posting sad to be you. Your math skills are hialrIous.

RandomGuy trying to bury so he can claim no proof and deflect. He needs simple math lessons.

[RandomGuy]

RandomGuy trying to bury so he can claim no proof and deflect. He needs simple math lessons.


When these disinfo agents that work forums are checkmated in a debate, they try to bury that part of the debate to reduce the number of viewers who see it. Then they go on as if nothing had happened.

They're just like the Black Knight in this video.

Monty Python - The Black Knight - Tis But A Scratch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs


RandomGuy tap danced around an issue instead of addressing it on page #21.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=203274&page=21

:rollin :lmao :rollin :lmao

You tell me all about it. Show me on the doll where I touched your conspiracy theory.

[tholdren]

:rollin :lmao :rollin :lmao

You tell me all about it. Show me on the doll where I touched your conspiracy theory.

remember when you said it wasn't 2x the flu? Lol your math

[RandomGuy]

remember when you said it wasn't 2x the flu? Lol your math

Remember when I asked you to back up your claims.. and you couldn't?

Show me on the doll where I touched your conspiracy theory.

[tholdren]

Remember when I asked you to back up your claims.. and you couldn't?

Show me on the doll where I touched your conspiracy theory.
Remember when I pasted above and you couldn't read it because you dont know what ifr means. Hysterical. Lol cdc says I'm correct. I bet that hurts being proven wrong day after day after day.... lol sad to be a gossiping kind of guy Mr. 1 bed

[RandomGuy]

Remember when I pasted above and you couldn't read it because you dont know what ifr means. Hysterical. Lol cdc says I'm correct. I bet that hurts being proven wrong day after day after day.... lol sad to be a gossiping kind of guy Mr. 1 bed

cdc doesn't say you are correct. That is your claim about what the cdc says. Another claim you have yet to back up.

You posted a planning document, not a scientific study.

You suck at this.

[boutons_deux]

rightwingnutjobs are fucking hilarious

against vaccinations, proven to prevent disease and deaths, because a minuscule number have bad reaaction

but

for stopping social-distancing, no matter how many 100Ks are diseased, damaged, dead.

[tholdren]

cdc doesn't say you are correct. That is your claim about what the cdc says. Another claim you have yet to back up.

You posted a planning document, not a scientific study.

You suck at this.

cdc ifr = 2x flu. That was planning based on science. Lololololl

This guy says the cdc published a planning document that wasn't using science to plan for a pandemic.



BWAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH

face it, you are low iq

[pgardn]

I'm not interested in it. So I won't. But that also means I won't comment on it, because that would be gossip.

like you have standards?

you are a liar as well as a fake.
You have commented on plenty of topics you know nothing about.

[pgardn]

cdc ifr = 2x flu. That was planning based on science. Lololololl

This guy says the cdc published a planning document that wasn't using science to plan for a pandemic.



BWAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH

face it, you are low iq

you have no idea what science is used for.
A document planning for a pandemic might have a number of places where suggestions are not backed by scientific study idiot.

there can be suggestions on how to address large diverse populations that don’t have any scientific backing at all. they rely on basic social norms of the times.

1) Tell the truth

(A Judeo-Christian holdover that is still used today. A moral code)

Idiot...

you don’t have any clue about what science can and cannot do.

[boutons_deux]

Immunity to the coronavirus remains a mystery.

Scientists are trying to crack the case

https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/11/coronavirus-immunity-vaccine-development/

[RandomGuy]

Here's some stuff from the vaxxed website that people can show to their skeptical friends.
https://www.vaxxed.com/stories-categorized-by-vaccine/


The glitch in my last post (https://www.vaxxed.com/stories-categorized-by-vaccine/)seems to have been fixed (https://www.vaxxed.com/stories-categorized-by-vaccine/)but some of the links are still not hotlinks. This didn't used to happen. Can the moderators fix it so that all links appear as hotlinks? I've seen a few eldery people who didn't know how to copy and paste.
(https://www.vaxxed.com/stories-categorized-by-vaccine/)

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0IxYWDltdHEqujnO/giphy.gif

No one cares.

Protip:

if you don't vaccinate your kids you are still a horrible parent.

We will need as many people as possible to slow the rates of transmission.

[Rummpd]

Pediatrician and public health trained doctor and if you have ever seen some of these diseases as I have there would be no qualms to vaccinate. Vaccines have potential slight risks but the benefits far outweigh these. I myself have had a number of vaccines most don't get due to my work or travels and I always took willingly.

[baseline bum]

This guy is trying to make people think the official story is the only story. I think most people have seen the alternative info.

This is about vaccines in general.
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=286342


This stuff is about the covid vaccine.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender_category/covid/

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/11/25/michael-yeadon-pfizer-coronavirus-scam.aspx

I'll copy the whole article. There's a video in the link too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY AT-A-GLANCE



There are currently no excess deaths while cases increase.
Data show many deaths — primarily people aged 45 to 65, with equal distribution between the sexes — are mainly due to heart disease, stroke and cancer, which suggests they are excess deaths caused by lack of routine medical care due to the pandemic restrictions
The PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and should not be done on the scale we’re now doing it. The high rate of false positives is only fodder for needless fearmongering
Virtually no one who is asymptomatic has the live virus, but when you run the test at a cycle threshold over 30, meaning you amplify the viral RNA more than 30 times, you end up with a positive test even if the virus is inactive and noninfectious
According to Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer, very few people will need the COVID-19 vaccine as the mortality rate is so low and the illness is clearly not causing excess deaths





I've written several articles about scientists and medical doctors who question the official narrative about the COVID-19 pandemic and the global measures (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/17/coronavirus-fraud-biggest-crime-against-humanity.aspx) put into place because of it, from useless testing, mask wearing (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/19/are-face-masks-effective.aspx) and social distancing (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/06/25/social-distancing.aspx), to lockdowns, tracking and tracing (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/05/13/digital-vaccination-certificate.aspx) and the baseless fearmongering driving it all.
In the video above, British journalist Anna Brees interviews Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis.
In it, he discusses several concerns, including his belief that widespread PCR testing is creating the false idea that the pandemic is resurging, as the total mortality rate is completely normal. He also discusses his concerns about COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
PCR Testing Is Causing a False 'Casedemic'

As I explained in "Asymptomatic 'Casedemic' Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/11/19/covid-testing-fraud-fuels-casedemic.aspx)," by using PCR testing, which cannot diagnose active infection, a false narrative has been created.
Currently, rising "cases," meaning positive tests, are again being used as the justification to impose more severe restrictions, including lockdowns and mandatory mask wearing, when in fact positive tests have nothing to do with the actual spread of illness.
According to Yeadon, the U.K. has now tested an estimated 30 million people, or close to half of the population. "A large number of those tests have been recent," Yeadon says, noting that the definition of a "coronavirus death" in the U.K. is anyone who dies, from any cause, within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test.
You cannot have a lethal pandemic stalking the land and not have excess deaths. ~ Michael Yeadon, Ph.D.
So, what we're seeing now is a natural death rate — about 1,700 people die each day in the U.K. in any given year, Yeadon says — but many of these deaths are now falsely attributed to COVID-19. "I'm calling out the statistics, and even the claim that there is an ongoing pandemic, as false," he says.
He challenges anyone who doesn't believe him to seek out any database on total mortality. If you do that, you will find that the daily death count is "absolutely bang-on normal," Yeadon says.
For some months, the death count is actually slightly lower than the average norm over the past five years. And, he adds, "You cannot have a lethal pandemic stalking the land and not have excess deaths."
Lack of Routine Medical Care Is Causing Uptick in Deaths

The slight uptick in deaths that are now being reported simply aren't directly due to COVID-19, he insists. Data show these deaths — primarily people aged 45 to 65, with equal distribution between the sexes — are mainly from heart disease, stroke and cancer, which suggests they are excess deaths caused by inaccessibility of routine medical care as people are either afraid or discouraged from going to the hospital.
These deaths may be characterized as being COVID related, but that's only because they have been falsely lumped into that category due to false positives being recorded within 28 days of death.
Again, people are being tested very regularly, and the rate of false positives is extremely high. All hospital patients are also tested upon admission, so when they die — regardless of the cause — they're likely to have a false positive on their record, which then lumps them into the death tally for COVID-19.
"The longer you stay in hospital, the more likely you are to die, obviously," Yeadon says. "You would be released if you were well and improving. So … long-stay patients are both more likely to die statistically, and much more likely to be tested so often that they'll have a false positive test.


That is what I think is happening … It's a convenience for someone playing some macabre game, because I don't think it's an error anymore … I've spoken to people in [public health] and they're embarrassed that they're not even being allowed to characterize and publish the information you would need to know to work out how useful the test is. That's not being done."

Can You Get Reinfected?

Yeadon also says he's "sick and tired" of people claiming that immunity against SARS-CoV-2 may wane after a short time, leaving you vulnerable to reinfection. If you've been ill with COVID-19 and recover, you will have antibodies against the virus, and you will be immune, he says.
He understands that journalists may get this wrong, or may be given incorrect information, but if a scientist says this, "they are lying to you," he says. Yeadon categorically denies the premise that you can recover from COVID-19 and later get reinfected and experience severe illness again.
According to Yeadon, there are only two ways by which COVID-19 would not provide lasting immunity. The first would be if it destroys your immune system. The HIV virus, for example, which causes AIDS, disarms your immune system, causing permanent impairment. Hence you do not become immune to the HIV virus. Coronaviruses do not do that.
The second way is if the virus mutates, which is common among influenza viruses. If the virus mutates, your immune system may not fully recognize it and will have to mount a defense again, thereby creating another set of antibodies. However, coronaviruses are genetically stable, Yeadon says.
(For transparency, there have been reports of SARS-CoV-2 mutating,1 so it's not impossible that some people might get reinfected with a slightly mutated version of the virus that might make them sick again.)
Hidden Agenda in Plain Sight

As noted by Yeadon, people are now changing the laws of immunology, which simply shouldn't happen. This should not be a political issue, but somehow it is being treated as one. He claims to have no ideas at all as to why these false narratives are being created, and why scientific truth that contradicts the mainstream narrative is being censored.
Others, however, have become more outspoken about this issue, pointing out how the pandemic is being used as a convenient excuse and justification for redistribution of wealth and the technocratic takeover of the whole world under the banner of a Great Reset (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/28/the-great-reset.aspx) to a "more equitable" social order and greener commerce.
It's being used to usher in social changes that simply could never be introduced without some sort of calamity, be it war or a biological threat, because they involve a radical limitation of personal freedoms and the elimination of privacy. Those in charge of pandemic response measures also refuse to take into account the price of these measures.
When making public health decisions, you need to calculate the cost in terms of lives saved and the price in dollars and cents of saving those people, against the cost of not implementing the measure in question. This is not being done. The question is why is such an illogical stance being taken?
Yeadon on Vaccination

Toward the end of the interview, Yeadon addresses the issue of COVID-19 vaccination. Many are nervous about it becoming mandatory, and rightfully so. Vaccine passports are already being rolled out, and all the indicators point to vaccination becoming a requirement for travel, perhaps even within national borders.
Having spent his career in the pharmaceutical industry, Yeadon fully supports vaccination, believing they prevent large numbers of deaths. However, when it comes to SARS-CoV-2, he believes the vaccine will only benefit the elderly. For those over 80, a vaccine might give them a few more months of life.
"Nobody else needs this [vaccine]," he says. "You don't vaccinate a population because 1 in 1 million might have a bad outcome [from the infection]." He also strongly believes the vaccine must be voluntary:
"It's an appalling … public platform to suggest that the only way we get our lives back is to mass vaccinate the population. Something very smelly is going on. It's simply not appropriate. I don't even think it would work."

In an open letter to the British health minister, Yeadon wrote:2
"I have read the consultation document. I've rarely been as shocked and upset. All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months. If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.


This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information. My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don't).


Instead, it's the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development, should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis. That's my concern.


And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing. You have literally no data on this and neither does anyone else.


It isn't that I'm saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it is that you have no idea what will happen yet, despite this, you'll be creating the impression that you do …


I don't trust you. You've not been straightforward and have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis. You're still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines?"

What Can You Do?

In his interview with Brees, Yeadon suggests medical professionals, especially those who are members of a professional society, who disagree with further pandemic measures — based on the medical facts — write an open letter to the government, urging them to speak to and heed the recommendations from independent experts.
Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn't a pandemic anymore. First and foremost, there are no excess deaths. The same number of people have died this year that, on average, have died in previous years. This simply wouldn't be the case if we had a lethal pandemic.
Second, the PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and should not be done on the scale we're now doing it. The high rate of false positives is only fodder for needless fearmongering. "People should demand to know what [the false positive] rate is," Yeadon says.
Additionally, "testing people who are well — it's just a madcap thing," he says. Virtually no one who is asymptomatic has the live virus, but when you run the test at a cycle threshold over 30, meaning you amplify the viral RNA more than 30 times, you end up with a positive test even if the virus is inactive and noninfectious.
"Let's get back to the facts," Yeadon says. "There are no excess deaths. But that's not what you hear from the BBC now, is it? I'm never going to trust the BBC again, by the way. I've watched BBC for 41 years. [They're] never coming back into my ears, because they've lied in my face all year … There's a fraud going on …


You're walking into voluntary house arrest when there are no excess deaths. Why are you doing that? Seriously? … I'm fearful, because it doesn't make any sense and there are no benign outcomes."

Get Organized

It's easy to get so confused that you can no longer think straight these days. As explained by Dr. Peter Breggin, featured in "Psychiatrist Blows the Whistle on Pandemic Fearmongering (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/11/15/how-is-fear-appeal-used-in-public-health-messaging.aspx)," when you add uncertainty to fear you end up with anxiety, a state in which you can no longer think logically.
If this applies to you, I urge you to turn off mainstream media news and turn to independent experts, such as Yeadon. Do the research. Read through the science. Reorient yourself to the facts and turn off the propaganda. Next, join a group so that you can have support.
A number of groups have formed around the world that are now rising up against mask mandates, mandatory vaccinations and lockdowns. A few examples of such groups include:


Us for Them (https://usforthem.co.uk/), a group campaigning for reopening schools and protecting children's rights in the U.K.
Keep Britain Free (https://www.keepbritainfree.com/)
The COVID Recovery Group (CRG), founded by 50 conservative British MPs to fight lockdown restrictions3
In the U.S., a team of attorneys, doctors, business owners and parents started the Freedom to Breathe Agency (https://www.ftbagency.com/), which is fighting to protect freedom and liberty

Additional sources of information and groups fighting for truth and transparency that are worth checking out include:


The Great Barrington Declaration (https://gbdeclaration.org/),4 which calls for an end to lockdowns. As of November 18, 2020, it had been signed by 34,973 medical practitioners, 12,070 medical and public health scientists, and 634,838 concerned citizens5
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s The Defender (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/welcome-to-the-defender/), a new newsletter that publishes "banned" news
The German COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (ACU2020.org (https://acu2020.org/)), which is launching an international class-action lawsuit against a long list of authorities over the global pandemic response
In Spain, more than 600 doctors have formed Doctors for the Truth (Medicos por la verdad (https://medicosporlaverdad.es/))
In the U.S., doctors have formed a group called America's Frontline Doctors (https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/), which is fighting to make hydroxychloroquine available across the nation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


There are a lot of hotlinks in the article. If you click on the link, you may have to enter your email to see the article with all the hotlinks.


tl;dr faggot

[Trainwreck2100]

:lol bing

[baseline bum]

Hey baseline bum...

What do you think of this?

Robert Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree respond to Bill Gates unsafe Covid-19 Vaccine (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbMp30_B4cs)
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=COVID-19+vaccine+Robert+F.+Kennedy+Jr.++Del+Bigtree+high wire&&view=detail&mid=F8790D597B6C34DA4DDBF8790D597B6C34DA4DDB&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3DCOVID-19%2520vaccine%2520Robert%2520F.%2520Kennedy%2520J r.%2520%2520Del%2520Bigtree%2520highwire%26qs%3Dn% 26form%3DQBVR%26sp%3D-1%26pq%3Dcovid-19%2520vaccine%2520robert%2520f.%2520kennedy%2520j r.%2520del%2520bigtree%2520highwire%26sc%3D0-59%26sk%3D%26cvid%3DA5048861FDF549FDABD7B1EA556212 57

Sorry about the glitch in this site. Copy and paste the link and close all the spaces. If that doesn't work, do a search on the title in bing.com

It's strange that I don't see similar glitches in other people's posts.



(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbMp30_B4cs)


I think you're a piece of shit

[RandomGuy]

Ok. Now what do you think of this?
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=286223&page=39&p=10361807&viewfull=1#post10361807

You are still a piece of shit. An insane piece of shit.

[Trainwreck2100]

Hey baseline bum...

What do you think of this?

Robert Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree respond to Bill Gates unsafe Covid-19 Vaccine (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbMp30_B4cs)
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=COVID-19+vaccine+Robert+F.+Kennedy+Jr.++Del+Bigtree+high wire&&view=detail&mid=F8790D597B6C34DA4DDBF8790D597B6C34DA4DDB&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3DCOVID-19%2520vaccine%2520Robert%2520F.%2520Kennedy%2520J r.%2520%2520Del%2520Bigtree%2520highwire%26qs%3Dn% 26form%3DQBVR%26sp%3D-1%26pq%3Dcovid-19%2520vaccine%2520robert%2520f.%2520kennedy%2520j r.%2520del%2520bigtree%2520highwire%26sc%3D0-59%26sk%3D%26cvid%3DA5048861FDF549FDABD7B1EA556212 57

Sorry about the glitch in this site. Copy and paste the link and close all the spaces. If that doesn't work, do a search on the title in bing.com

It's strange that I don't see similar glitches in other people's posts.



(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbMp30_B4cs)



No, it's not strange you're a fucking idiot who doesn't know how to use the internet, you posted the entire search string instead of the source address for video.

[tholdren]

Not really much to discuss, other than to see if the people who flat out refuse can provide a good amount of scientific evidence to show that vaccines are, on balance, bad.

Granted and acceded costs:
Some people who receive vaccines will die. This is documented, and does happen, from what I understand. It is, however, a cost that is far, far lower than the cost of letting millions die from a disease that can easily be prevented.

There is pretty overwhelming evidence that vaccines have prevented billions of deaths and disfigurements, ala polio.

If you want to claim that there is some super-solid evidence about all vaccines or just certain ones, feel free to present it.

The emotional hook of the thread title got you here, now let's see what evidence is actually out there.

If you can't provide some solid science, you are acting on little more than the faith healing do-dahs, who think God will rescue their kids.
http://www.google.com/search?q=faith+healing+deaths

Lololol9looolloloooooo

Kids dont need a covid vax period

[Ef-man]

Lololol9looolloloooooo

Kids dont need a covid vax period

Soifolding foldren is wrong again, par.

[tholdren]

Lololol9looolloloooooo

Kids dont need a covid vax period

[ChumpDumper]

foldren needs friends

[Spurtacular]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/060/649/609/original/e82fc664b7d138a3.png

[ChumpDumper]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/060/649/609/original/e82fc664b7d138a3.png

Trump approved it.

[spurraider21]

damn why is trump pimping big pharma