PDA

View Full Version : Someone Convince Me The Grizzlies Shouldn't Be The Overwhelming Favorite in the WCF



Pages : 1 [2]

RD2191
05-17-2013, 11:42 PM
I don't understand how we aren't expected to beat a 5 seed. I mean they're a 5 seed for a reason. Spurs are a 2 seed for a reason.

moisaenz
05-18-2013, 12:10 AM
If diaw stops being hesitant on shooting the ball we can manage without bonner having to play to stretch the floor

baseline bum
05-18-2013, 12:12 AM
I don't understand how we aren't expected to beat a 5 seed. I mean they're a 5 seed for a reason. Spurs are a 2 seed for a reason.

And they were an 8-seed too.

baseline bum
05-18-2013, 08:32 AM
If it makes anyone feel better, timvp was very wrong about last year's WCF when he picked the Spurs in 5. So hopefully he can go 0/2 in his predictions.

doobs
05-18-2013, 08:40 AM
I don't understand how we aren't expected to beat a 5 seed. I mean they're a 5 seed for a reason. Spurs are a 2 seed for a reason.

Grizzlies won 56 games. Spurs won 58 games. Not a huge difference.

tmtcsc
05-18-2013, 08:46 AM
I'm feeling better about this series. I think it would be wise to smother Conley and make things extremely uncomfortable. He's the head of the snake for that team. The Clippers tried to trap him but he broke that easily so I'm thinking it would be best to put a bigger defender on him. Put Parker on someone else perhaps and let him save his energy for the offensive end.

We also need to make their bigs work and try to get them in foul trouble. Get them off the floor for long periods. One thing for sure, there won't be a hack-a-big on Memphis. Those guys make their FT's. Should be a great series.

ploto
05-18-2013, 08:47 AM
Grizzlies know exactly who they are. Spurs still seem to waver back and forth.

I think a lot of Spurs fan do not appreciate the defense of the Grizzlies - kind of ironic.

I look forward to a good old-fashioned tough, physical series full of big guys playing dominant roles. I am not so sure that Splitter is ready for this and rather sure that Pop will turn to Bonner.

Rapper
05-18-2013, 09:12 AM
1 We have better ball movement

2 Our experience in playoffs is beyone compare even though we lost to them in 2011

3 The best coach in the decade is our Gregg pop

4 Our young guys are getting more confidence through past 2 series

5 The 2013 Duncan is far better than 2011ˊs no matter his mindset or attitude

6 We have home court advantage

7 In terms of offense ,we are definately excellent than Grizz in so many ways because we have more weopens and options

8 We are healthy.

9 We are avengers so that we have more momentum and desire to win this series.

10 The year 2013 is odd year

hey timvp ,dont be so soft , we are better team this year

spurs in 7

EVAY
05-18-2013, 09:33 AM
Is there any chance at all that Pop would activate Baynes for some of these games, simply to have another body to lean on Gasol and Randolph in the low post?

Does anyone think he might?

ginobilized
05-18-2013, 09:49 AM
My angle of hope centers around the idea that this Spurs team has not really peaked. Yet. It is possible that they find that extra gear.
If not, I still think that it could come down to end of game execution and the Spurs have a chance in those cases.

Memphis could easily make some costly mental mistakes that allow the Spurs a game or two. WCF is a lot more pressure than they are used to.

Bruno
05-18-2013, 10:05 AM
I expect/wish big series from Parker and Splitter.

Parker has been terrific during the regular season against Memphis (25.5ppg) and I expect it to continue. IMO, Conley's defense is damn overrated. His defensive regular season numbers are quite bad and Chris Paul just destroyed him in the first round.

For Splitter, while there are some wishful thinking too, he looked better at the end of the GS series after his disastrous start of the payoffs. I'm not really expecting big offensive numbers from him but it's his defense that could turn this series around. If Grizzlies can't dominate in the paint, they are as dangerous as a teddy bear.

Regardless, I like Spurs chances and I'm quite confident but so I was in 2011 against Memphis so take it for what it's worth...

Fabbs
05-18-2013, 10:26 AM
The bigger question is whether TP can get healthy enough to hurt them offensively, and how often our offence will go into a funk like it did for the last 15 mins of game 6. IMHO the team just needs to have faith in the system and stick to it.
Good points all on the others. As to TP...
Will Lord Poppycock move away from TP dominating the ball if TP is at 60%?
Many a possession was ghastly last series.

T Park
05-18-2013, 10:41 AM
I expect/wish big series from Parker and Splitter.

Parker has been terrific during the regular season against Memphis (25.5ppg) and I expect it to continue. IMO, Conley's defense is damn overrated. His defensive regular season numbers are quite bad and Chris Paul just destroyed him in the first round.

For Splitter, while there are some wishful thinking too, he looked better at the end of the GS series after his disastrous start of the payoffs. I'm not really expecting big offensive numbers from him but it's his defense that could turn this series around. If Grizzlies can't dominate in the paint, they are as dangerous as a teddy bear.

Regardless, I like Spurs chances and I'm quite confident but so I was in 2011 against Memphis so take it for what it's worth...

This team IMO is better suited to face the grizzlies this time around.

jag
05-18-2013, 10:42 AM
Tiago about to put the team on his back and cement his legacy as the best big man to play next to Duncan since The Admiral. He must be freed

dbestpro
05-18-2013, 11:08 AM
The Spurs will customize their approach for Memphis. In LA is was all about fronting the post. GSW was about matchups and execution. Memphis will be about pushing the ball before Memphis can set up their defense. The 2012 offense that pushed the ball evolved as a result of that 2011 Memphis series. Look for the Spurs to push the ball and try to run the limited bench of Memphis out the gym.

ajballer4
05-18-2013, 11:22 AM
Is there any chance at all that Pop would activate Baynes for some of these games, simply to have another body to lean on Gasol and Randolph in the low post?

Does anyone think he might?

I think he does. He was active in the Laker's series. While Diaw was hurt then, I think we can all agree if he did a good job on Howard. He won't play unless there is an emergency, but I can see him being active while De Colo/TMac are inactive. Grizz have no wing threats, McGrady won't be needed

spursince#99
05-18-2013, 12:40 PM
I just fail to see how a team that struggles to score against decent defenses, I just, whatever.


Finish this statement

spursince#99
05-18-2013, 12:52 PM
we would've beat Memphis in 2011 had Dick made that 3 to win game 1 IMHO, tbh. That 3 set the tempo the entire series along with Manu being hobbled, and our D is SIGNIFICANTLY better than that 2011 defense. Thanks in large part to those gunners on the Warriors who basically taught us how to play tight physical defense IMO. I honestly believe that year was fools gold anyway. I mean Blair, Bonner, Neal, and Dick got valuable minutes for crying out loud :lol

therealtruth
05-18-2013, 06:49 PM
I think he does. He was active in the Laker's series. While Diaw was hurt then, I think we can all agree if he did a good job on Howard. He won't play unless there is an emergency, but I can see him being active while De Colo/TMac are inactive. Grizz have no wing threats, McGrady won't be needed

I think McGrady's best value could be when the offense is stalled and we're struggling to score. One thing I remember from the '11 series is we struggled to score against their set defense. The Grizzlies don't give up much 3's and they pack the paint. That means the easiest ways to score our in transition and from midrange. In the half court execution will be key. The Spurs will need to move the defense and get the best available shot.

Trainwreck2100
05-18-2013, 06:57 PM
And they were an 8-seed too.

they tanked that year for the spurs though

Obstructed_View
05-18-2013, 07:40 PM
And they were an 8-seed too.
They intentionally tanked for a Spurs team that had an injured Manu Ginobili and a center rotation that averages 6'7" tall.


Grizzlies won 56 games. Spurs won 58 games. Not a huge difference.
The Grizzlies were playing for seeding up until the last day of the season. The Spurs had basically nothing to play for the last two weeks of the season. They were six and a half games ahead of Memphis when they let up on the gas.

Tbiggums47
05-18-2013, 09:01 PM
I apologize in advance but my first reaction when thinking about the Spurs vs. Grizzlies is Memphis should be considered a heavy favorite. Right now, I'm thinking the Grizzlies in 5 or 6 is a pretty damn safe bet. I hate to be this pessimistic but I just don't see how the Spurs are going to win this series. Maybe someone can convince me otherwise but ...

1. Duncan isn't playing that well. He had trouble with Bogut and Marc Gasol is just a better version than Bogut. TD has had a great season but it's asking a ton for him to shine against the DPOY.

2. Parker is hurting. He had trouble scoring against a Warriors team with iffy defensive guards and limited bigs. What's going to happen against Conley -- arguably the best Parker defender in the league -- and a team with legit bigmen and other players with agile length? On paper, this looks like it'll be a disastrous series for TP unless he miraculously returns to health.

3. Ginobili is no longer in the stage of his career where he can carry a team. And besides, going up against Tony Allen would be a tall task no matter his age.

4. Splitter played a bit better today but he's still playing without physicality. He has trouble grabbing contested boards. He still has issues finishing in crowds. Those three faults play perfectly into the Grizzlies hands.

5. Leonard and Green just came off of a GREAT defensive series -- but Memphis does their damage on the inside. There really won't be anyone for those two to shut down. Thus, it'll be much more difficult to impact the series.

6. Diaw, Bonner and Blair are all poor matchups against a physical frontline.

7. Neal's ballhandling and decision-making against that pressure defense? Yikes.

8. Does Joseph have the experience to play in what is going to be a glorified back alley dogfight?

9. The Grizzlies are at the very least as good defensively as the Spurs. Most likely, they're better. San Antonio was superior offensively for the majority of this season -- but they've fallen off a cliff in the last couple months. That ball-movement that made this team special is mostly gone. They don't have much in terms of individual creators. The Grizzlies offense isn't awesome but their scoring, on paper at least, will be more reliable since it'll come on the inside. Add in the points they'll create by forcing turnovers and hitting the offensive glass -- and I can't make a strong case for the Spurs having a better offense or defense right now.

10. We still really don't know how good the Spurs are at the moment. Should we take anything from sweeping the Lakers? Probably not. Is struggling with a Warriors team that was mediocre in the regular season a bad sign? Yeah, probably. Add in the poor way the Spurs ended the regular season -- and this team is still riddled with question marks. The Grizzlies, on the other hand, know exactly what they are and what they aren't.




I hope beyond hope that I'm dead wrong. I really, really, really want the Spurs to win this series. (In fact, just making it to the Finals would make my year; I wouldn't even care if the Spurs lost to the Heat -- I just want this team to make the Finals one last time.)

Hopefully there are a few pieces to the puzzle that I'm missing. Maybe one of you can give me some hope. Maybe when I crunch the numbers, I'll see it differently.

I want to believe -- but as I'm sitting here right now, I just can't do it by any logical means. I'm sorry.

Sorry TIMVP
,
although your insight during the season has been spot on. YOU and many others seem to underestimate the resilience of this team. I have to agree with Dan Carney of the Spurs Nation. Although Memphis is a defensive juggernaut type team to contend with....They just don't have the offensive muscle to move me away from a team who has offensive balance and defense to match........Not to mention the benefit of having home court. You pointing out the obvious can not change what the Basketball Gods have ordained.......A fifth Championship Baby.....Peace!

Spurs 4 The Win
05-18-2013, 10:10 PM
Sorry TIMVP
,
although your insight during the season has been spot on. YOU and many others seem to underestimate the resilience of this team. I have to agree with Dan Carney of the Spurs Nation. Although Memphis is a defensive juggernaut type team to contend with....They just don't have the offensive muscle to move me away from a team who has offensive balance and defense to match........Not to mention the benefit of having home court. You pointing out the obvious can not change what the Basketball Gods have ordained.......A fifth Championship Baby.....Peace!

Swag Swag Swag
Preach it!

Nbadan
05-18-2013, 11:59 PM
Back to fundamentals...to win this series the Spurs offense has to click....the Spurs need Diaw, Splitter and Duncan to hit the offensive board...one shot per possession isn't going to get it done...Tony has to be able to penetrate the lanes against Memphis's zone defense..Spurs can't let ZBo go off..should be all hands on deck every time he touches the ball...let Conley and the guards beat you from the outside..

Nbadan
05-19-2013, 12:08 AM
I think part of TimVP's apprehension is that the Griz need a lot less to go right than the Spurs do to win this series...but ultimately, shots got to fall and that's why we play the games...

callo1
05-19-2013, 12:19 AM
Must go up tempo. Can't allow Memphis to get their defense set, or it will be very tough to score. Put Danny on Conely and hide TP on Allen...I don't see them going through Allen on offense.

Tiago is the best low post "stonewall" post defender on the team when he shows up...he needs to show up.

I would deactivate Mills and activate Baynes for more size and muscle against Randolph/Gasol.

Trust Tmac for 4-5 minutes a game to cover an aging Prince...he can do that.

Must hit threes early in the games to soften up the Grizz defense...if they don't respect the shooters, Tony is gonna have a hell of a time getting to the basket, and Timmy is going to get beat up.

Must have Spurs bigs leak out and beat a lumbering Gasol down the floor to get easy buckets.

Use some zone here and there...not too much, but just enough to confuse them a bit...maybe at the beginning/end of quarters.

Have Cojo continue to play exceptional defense...he can disrupt Conely.

Most importantly, DO NOT put Bonner on a single Grizz big man. I do think Blair can have very brief stints of success if used correctly.

Sean Cagney
05-19-2013, 01:53 AM
Must go up tempo. Can't allow Memphis to get their defense set, or it will be very tough to score. Put Danny on Conely and hide TP on Allen...I don't see them going through Allen on offense.

Tiago is the best low post "stonewall" post defender on the team when he shows up...he needs to show up.

I would deactivate Mills and activate Baynes for more size and muscle against Randolph/Gasol.

Trust Tmac for 4-5 minutes a game to cover an aging Prince...he can do that.

Must hit threes early in the games to soften up the Grizz defense...if they don't respect the shooters, Tony is gonna have a hell of a time getting to the basket, and Timmy is going to get beat up.

Must have Spurs bigs leak out and beat a lumbering Gasol down the floor to get easy buckets.

Use some zone here and there...not too much, but just enough to confuse them a bit...maybe at the beginning/end of quarters.

Have Cojo continue to play exceptional defense...he can disrupt Conely.

Most importantly, DO NOT put Bonner on a single Grizz big man. I do think Blair can have very brief stints of success if used correctly.

IF POP USES BONNER ALOT WE ARE FUCKED, believe that. He will be garbage in this series against those bigs! They are not soft minded like Howard is.

intlspurshk
05-19-2013, 02:22 AM
It comes down to how spurs bench against Memphis bench. If guys like D Arthur or Bayless get hot against spurs then no Memphis in 6.

Spurs do have lot of wounds recently and they seriously need 1 more go-to player. TP is not too reliable and Manu is somewhat a good but not great player

z0sa
05-19-2013, 02:30 AM
IF POP USES BONNER ALOT WE ARE FUCKED, believe that. He will be garbage in this series against those bigs! They are not soft minded like Howard is.

Expect Bonner some early on in the series. He did well vs LA and Pop will remember that unlike some here. I agree he should have a short leash.

Johnny RIngo
05-19-2013, 10:29 AM
When the Spurs lose to the Grizzlies, the popular reason will be "Parker was injured". Whatever excuse to make themselves feel better about Parker being a choke artist. Ginobili looks awful right now so you can't rely on him anymore to carry TP and the Spurs backcourt when things get rough. TD will be solid but age catches up with everyone and I don't think he has enough gas to make one more run at a championship.

Anyway, Grizzlies to make the Finals where they will get curbstomped by the Heat. Miami will have the better offense, comparable defense, the two best players on the court, and the superior role players. These same things apply if Miami were to play SA in the Finals but that won't be happening.

GaryJohnston
05-19-2013, 10:46 AM
The Grizzlies are a scary team to face. They are completely different than Golden state, who score from the perimeter first. The Gizz like to go inside. If Splitter can step up and Tim can be Tim one more time, I say we force them to beat us from the outside. It'll be a very interesting matchup. Lower scoring than the Golden State series.

Believe.

Technique
05-19-2013, 04:37 PM
Spurs giving a big F U to this thread :lol

Calispursfan11
05-19-2013, 04:41 PM
:lol Timvp tbh. Hope he's giving the Spurs at least "a chance" in the series now.

Calispursfan11
05-19-2013, 04:43 PM
Lol, Tmac getting some burn with almost 6 mins left. Awesome. Smh Timvp...

ddjeffries
05-19-2013, 04:48 PM
Answer: Game 1.

hater
05-19-2013, 04:57 PM
:lmao timvp

:lmao tmac

:lmao both scrubs :lmao

milkyway21
05-19-2013, 05:14 PM
6 reasons for now:

1. HOMECOURT ADVANTAGE - San Antonio has won 16 of 17 home games against Memphis.

2. SAN ANTONIO LOST TO MEMPHIS 2X this season by just 2 & 3 pts and won 2x, (one by 21 pts.well, that was after the $250K fine:()
3. The Spurs is ONE of the few teams to score 100 against them.
4. Memphis has no 3-pt scoring threat.
5. This is a different Spurs team than they last met. This one has so many players who can score from the wings. But if they are afraid to shoot from there then it's another story ex Bonner.

6. While Memphis is better in defense, San Antonio is better in scoring. They can win this series from there. No need to grind inside against those guys if our shots from the wings are falling.

Spurs in 6..

Bonner was alive !

14-29 3s -48 % :clap:

DesignatedT
05-19-2013, 05:20 PM
I am not one of those declaring this series over and I think the grizz will most def end up being a very tough out but I still don't understand how one could say that last years Spurs team would sweep the Grizz last playoff but these Spurs have no chance this season with an immensely improved defense against this Grizz team.

milkyway21
05-19-2013, 05:32 PM
they were better in 2Q & 3Q what if Z scored 15 & Gasol 15 too?

1-0 but well, I don't think we can sweep these guys ..

capek
05-19-2013, 09:21 PM
Where us optimists failed, hopefully today the Spurs succeeded. :tu

Knoxxx
05-19-2013, 09:51 PM
I apologize in advance but my first reaction when thinking about the Spurs vs. Grizzlies is Memphis should be considered a heavy favorite. Right now, I'm thinking the Grizzlies in 5 or 6 is a pretty damn safe bet. I hate to be this pessimistic but I just don't see how the Spurs are going to win this series. Maybe someone can convince me otherwise but ...

1. Duncan isn't playing that well. He had trouble with Bogut and Marc Gasol is just a better version than Bogut. TD has had a great season but it's asking a ton for him to shine against the DPOY.

2. Parker is hurting. He had trouble scoring against a Warriors team with iffy defensive guards and limited bigs. What's going to happen against Conley -- arguably the best Parker defender in the league -- and a team with legit bigmen and other players with agile length? On paper, this looks like it'll be a disastrous series for TP unless he miraculously returns to health.

3. Ginobili is no longer in the stage of his career where he can carry a team. And besides, going up against Tony Allen would be a tall task no matter his age.

4. Splitter played a bit better today but he's still playing without physicality. He has trouble grabbing contested boards. He still has issues finishing in crowds. Those three faults play perfectly into the Grizzlies hands.

5. Leonard and Green just came off of a GREAT defensive series -- but Memphis does their damage on the inside. There really won't be anyone for those two to shut down. Thus, it'll be much more difficult to impact the series.

6. Diaw, Bonner and Blair are all poor matchups against a physical frontline.

7. Neal's ballhandling and decision-making against that pressure defense? Yikes.

8. Does Joseph have the experience to play in what is going to be a glorified back alley dogfight?

9. The Grizzlies are at the very least as good defensively as the Spurs. Most likely, they're better. San Antonio was superior offensively for the majority of this season -- but they've fallen off a cliff in the last couple months. That ball-movement that made this team special is mostly gone. They don't have much in terms of individual creators. The Grizzlies offense isn't awesome but their scoring, on paper at least, will be more reliable since it'll come on the inside. Add in the points they'll create by forcing turnovers and hitting the offensive glass -- and I can't make a strong case for the Spurs having a better offense or defense right now.

10. We still really don't know how good the Spurs are at the moment. Should we take anything from sweeping the Lakers? Probably not. Is struggling with a Warriors team that was mediocre in the regular season a bad sign? Yeah, probably. Add in the poor way the Spurs ended the regular season -- and this team is still riddled with question marks. The Grizzlies, on the other hand, know exactly what they are and what they aren't.




I hope beyond hope that I'm dead wrong. I really, really, really want the Spurs to win this series. (In fact, just making it to the Finals would make my year; I wouldn't even care if the Spurs lost to the Heat -- I just want this team to make the Finals one last time.)

Hopefully there are a few pieces to the puzzle that I'm missing. Maybe one of you can give me some hope. Maybe when I crunch the numbers, I'll see it differently.

I want to believe -- but as I'm sitting here right now, I just can't do it by any logical means. I'm sorry.

Stop posting, tbh

Spurs and Mavs fan
05-22-2013, 01:27 PM
How about the fact that the Grizzlies need to win 4 out of the next 5 games?

SpursWoman
05-22-2013, 01:39 PM
Stop posting, tbh


I just choked on some granola ... that is too awesome not to quote. :lol

SA210
05-22-2013, 01:53 PM
Stop posting, tbh


:lmao:rollin

T Park
05-22-2013, 01:57 PM
I just choked on some granola ... that is too awesome not to quote. :lol


Sup stranger...

Rummpd
05-22-2013, 02:18 PM
I am not one of those declaring this series over and I think the grizz will most def end up being a very tough out but I still don't understand how one could say that last years Spurs team would sweep the Grizz last playoff but these Spurs have no chance this season with an immensely improved defense against this Grizz team.

How many would take 10 or 20 to one odds on the above - Grizz defense very good but Spurs have beat far better superstar driven teams 2 straight on road many times before?

hater
05-22-2013, 02:20 PM
Stop posting, tbh

:lmao

superjames1992
05-25-2013, 11:04 PM
Fantastic jinx thread, tbh. Good job, timvp. :toast

Uriel
05-25-2013, 11:08 PM
The Heat / Pacers are overwhelming favorites against the Spurs in the NBA Finals, tbh. :p:

pikkiwoki
05-25-2013, 11:08 PM
CIA timvp :toast

hater
05-25-2013, 11:12 PM
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

timvp
05-25-2013, 11:13 PM
I was wrong.











Grizzlies in 7.












Tbh.

hater
05-25-2013, 11:13 PM
I was wrong.











Grizzlies in 7.












Tbh.

:lol I love u bro

timvp
05-25-2013, 11:14 PM
^ Not joking.

Horry Hipcheck
05-25-2013, 11:15 PM
Spurs will either finish the sweep in a tight Game 4 or rain hellfire down from the rafters of the AT&T Center in Game 5.

Strategic
05-25-2013, 11:15 PM
Spurs in five I said.

SpursWoman
05-25-2013, 11:18 PM
Sup stranger...

Hola!

ezau
05-25-2013, 11:18 PM
Hahaha

100%duncan
05-25-2013, 11:18 PM
I was wrong.









Grizzlies in 7.












Tbh.

:lmao :lmao :lmao

Bruno
05-25-2013, 11:19 PM
It's not like Spurs have been awfully dominant in this series. 2 games went to OT.

And it's too soon to laugh. One day, a team will come back from a 0-3 deficit to win a series.

SA210
05-25-2013, 11:19 PM
:lmao

cheguevara
05-25-2013, 11:20 PM
It's not like Spurs have been awfully dominant in this series. 2 games went to OT.

And it's too soon to laugh. One day, a team will come back from a 0-3 deficit to win a series.

:lmao well done sir :lol

Spursfanfromafar
05-25-2013, 11:21 PM
I will look more into systemic things than individual things-

1) The Spurs' offense picked up in the 5th and 6th games. The ball movement was smooth, they were doing well in the P&Rs, the roll man was doing fine (Splitter, Duncan), the three point shooters were getting good shots off and Parker was mixing it up well despite his injury. The Spurs were thus looking more and more like the early-mid season team that was dominating on offense.

2) The Spurs' defense has been relentless in the last 4 games of the Warriors - tackling their outside perimeter game very well. Their interior defense has been good all along and should hold up against Randolph-Gasol even if the latter will get going relatively.

3) The Grizzlies' defense is fantastic and will work well against the Spurs and make them pay. But I think the Spurs' improving offense will hold on. On the other hand, the Grizzlies' offense is limited to interior play and Splitter recovering well from the ankle injury and a motivated Duncan should be enough while the Grizzlies' lack of a high voltage perimeter play or three point shooting should be their bane.

All said and done, the fact that the Spurs have improved defensively and are improving offensively, make it that they are the better team talent wise against the Grizzlies. They still lack their full flow systemically but they are getting there and that should help them overcome the Grizzlies hump in my opinion.

Self pat in the back...

CubanMustGo
05-25-2013, 11:28 PM
Grizzlies know exactly who they are. Spurs still seem to waver back and forth.

I think a lot of Spurs fan do not appreciate the defense of the Grizzlies - kind of ironic.

I look forward to a good old-fashioned tough, physical series full of big guys playing dominant roles. I am not so sure that Splitter is ready for this and rather sure that Pop will turn to Bonner.

Ploto with her usual anti-Spurs epic fail.

And where's so-called Spurs fan rascal?

michaelwcho
05-25-2013, 11:30 PM
:lmao well done sir :lol

cheguevara, I hope you aren't starting a new thread why Memphis might make a backdoor sweep this year!

SA210
05-25-2013, 11:31 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/382481_10201319576214714_364021229_n.jpg

benefactor
05-25-2013, 11:32 PM
It's not like Spurs have been awfully dominant in this series. 2 games went to OT.

And it's too soon to laugh. One day, a team will come back from a 0-3 deficit to win a series.
Probably...but it won't be this one. The Grizz are just too awful on offense to win four straight.

Bruno
05-25-2013, 11:39 PM
Probably...but it won't be this one. The Grizz are just too awful on offense to win four straight.

Yep, I'm quite confident Spurs will be able to finish it in 4 or 5 games. It's just the mandatory "it's not over til it's over" talk.

T Park
05-25-2013, 11:42 PM
It's not like Spurs have been awfully dominant in this series. 2 games went to OT.

And it's too soon to laugh. One day, a team will come back from a 0-3 deficit to win a series.

The spurs out scored them second quarter through OT 91-64.

They've won 11 of 13 quarters. Domination.

ShoogarBear
05-26-2013, 12:22 AM
Grizzlies in 7.


What, years?

PingPong
05-26-2013, 12:26 AM
(...) One day, a team will come back from a 0-3 deficit to win a series.

San Antônio Spurs against Miami Heat in the 2012-2013 finals, after half of some internet forum called spurstalk.com users committed suicide.

Spurs 4 The Win
05-26-2013, 12:27 AM
The spurs out scored them second quarter through OT 91-64.

They've won 12 of 14 quarters. Domination.

FIFY, Game 2 was OT also

100%duncan
05-26-2013, 12:27 AM
What, years?

:lmao

TheyCallMePro
05-26-2013, 12:28 AM
Are you kidding me Timvp? They have 1 great player in Randolph, and their are times where he gets benched at the end of games because of disputes with his coach. Were not going to lose to Jared Bayless, Tayshaun Prince, and Quincy Pondexter either. We have the much better team. I shouldn't even have to go through the match ups. Seriously, this is not two years ago. We didn't have Leonard or Green, and Splitter never played. That's 3 starters. Were much better. I think everyone is overrating Memphis right now. Remember. Were not the most talented team, but were still TWICE as talented as Memphis.

Posted this a week ago. And in a few other threads I said we'd win in 4 or 5 games.

ffadicted
05-26-2013, 12:28 AM
spurs shittin' on timvp

The Whopper
05-26-2013, 12:32 AM
Quintology.

GSH
05-26-2013, 12:38 AM
I was wrong.

Grizzlies in 7.



What, years?


Now that's funny.


I said from the start that if the Spurs could keep the rebounding and points in the paint close, Memphis would have a hard time winning a game. The Spurs actually out-rebounded Memphis tonight, and only got out-rebounded by 2 in the first game. They also scored more points in the paint tonight and in Game 2, and only got outscored by 2 in the paint in Game 1. That's a pretty tall order, with Gasol and Randolph, but the Spurs' results against Memphis' bigs in the playoffs mirrors what happened in the regular season almost perfectly.

If you remember the playoffs a couple of years ago, the Griz just owned the paint. They can't do that this year, even though the Gasol/Randolph combo was arguably the best it's ever been.

Aztecfan03
05-26-2013, 12:49 AM
The spurs out scored them second quarter through OT 91-64.

They've won 11 of 13 quarters. Domination.

there have been 14 quarters(2 overtimes) And I think we still only won 11 of them. still dominating though.

Aztecfan03
05-26-2013, 12:52 AM
FIFY, Game 2 was OT also

Lost 2 quarters in game 2 and one tonight, so 11 of 14.

TD 21
05-26-2013, 12:54 AM
:lol timvp . . . bandwagon to a tee.

John B
05-26-2013, 01:00 AM
How about 3-0 Timvp? I really believe if the Spurs play their best basketball against best basketball of any team, Spurs would win. It's because of their depth, their best team basketball. They need to beat not one but the entire squad to beat this team. With the starters playing lousy, the bench cleaned-up until the starters settled down. Where else do you see that? Bron-Bron, Wade and Bosh were not playing well, they lose, period.

therealtruth
05-26-2013, 01:00 AM
Alot of the Grizzlies offense relies on turning the other team over which can be remedied by not turning over the ball. Keep the turnovers down and they can't score enough in the half-court against our set defense.

therealtruth
05-26-2013, 01:02 AM
If you remember the playoffs a couple of years ago, the Griz just owned the paint. They can't do that this year, even though the Gasol/Randolph combo was arguably the best it's ever been.

The Splitter/Duncan combo should have happened sooner. We wasted two years because of Pop's stubbornness. I like the Spurs chances with that duo against any other frontcourt in the league.

timvp
05-26-2013, 01:11 AM
How about 3-0 Timvp?

Grizzlies in 7.

lefty
05-26-2013, 01:34 AM
Timvp happy to eat crow :lol

milkyway21
05-26-2013, 01:38 AM
Originally Posted by milkyway21

6 reasons for now:

1. HOMECOURT ADVANTAGE - San Antonio has won 16 of 17 home games against Memphis.

2. SAN ANTONIO LOST TO MEMPHIS 2X this season by just 2 & 3 pts and won 2x, (one by 21 pts.well, that was after the $250K fine)
3. The Spurs is ONE of the few teams to score 100 against them.
4. Memphis has no 3-pt scoring threat.
5. This is a different Spurs team than they last met. This one has so many players who can score from the wings. But if they are afraid to shoot from there then it's another story ex Bonner.

6. While Memphis is better in defense, San Antonio is better in scoring. They can win this series from there. No need to grind inside against those guys if our shots from the wings are falling.

Spurs in 6.. sorry.

the Spurs / Memphis series might be a 4-0 who knows

polandprzem
05-26-2013, 01:39 AM
Grizzlies in 7.

If they would do it your happiness level will rise?

SA210
05-26-2013, 01:40 AM
The Splitter/Duncan combo should have happened sooner. We wasted two years because of Pop's stubbornness. I like the Spurs chances with that duo against any other frontcourt in the league.

Mr.Bottomtooth
05-26-2013, 02:18 AM
^ Not joking.

If you're not trolling and/or massively drunk then what the hell makes you think so?

cutewizard
05-26-2013, 02:25 AM
so-called basketball experts predicted that the Grizzlies will beat the Spurs\\\

WHERE ARE THE EXPERTS NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

cutewizard
05-26-2013, 02:28 AM
I was wrong.






how about Grizzlies in nine????\

lol




Grizzlies in 7.












Tbh.

Splits
05-26-2013, 02:30 AM
so-called basketball experts predicted that the Grizzlies will beat the Spurs\\\


Not true
http://i829.photobucket.com/albums/zz212/akelch/spursgrizz.png

spurraider21
05-26-2013, 02:38 AM
timvp with the robdiazz bads

Legacy
05-26-2013, 02:39 AM
Spurs will either finish the sweep in a tight Game 4 or rain hellfire down from the rafters of the AT&T Center in Game 5.

Yes sir, I do tend to agree with ya. I sure do. MMMmmmm-HHHhhmmmmm. Said so myself... :hat LOL

RD2191
05-26-2013, 02:51 AM
timvp with the robdiazz bads
:lmao

Brunodf
05-26-2013, 02:56 AM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/2679999/facegasol.gif

Splits
05-26-2013, 02:58 AM
I'm convinced this is a season-long-will-not-admit-anti-reverse-double-anti-jinx persona. Either that or TJastal has hacked LJ's main non-troll account.

Grizz in 7 after down 3-0? Really? Not buying the apocalyptic ish anymore.

Obstructed_View
05-26-2013, 03:02 AM
I'm convinced this is a season-long-will-not-admit-anti-reverse-double-anti-jinx persona. Either that or TJastal has hacked LJ's main non-troll account.

Grizz in 7 after down 3-0? Really? Not buying the apocalyptic ish anymore.

Yeah. Pretty retarded wasting it all before the finals tbh.

Spur|n|Austin
05-26-2013, 03:05 AM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/2679999/facegasol.gif

:lol

ShoogarBear
05-26-2013, 03:07 AM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/2679999/facegasol.gif

Surprised Tony Allen didn't go down on that play, tbh.

Obstructed_View
05-26-2013, 03:08 AM
Surprised Tony Allen didn't go down on that play, tbh.

:lmao

NRHector
05-26-2013, 03:11 AM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/2679999/facegasol.gif

:lol

m33p0
05-26-2013, 03:17 AM
there's a first time for everything.

team-work
05-26-2013, 03:18 AM
:lmao

My thought was that on that play Gasol fell down to draw the Refs' attention to the fact that Duncan 'kicked' the ball, so that was at least partly a flop.

As for the Spurs going up 3-0, I have mixed feeling. Partly unhappy due to TD's divorce situation.

Stabula
05-26-2013, 03:25 AM
I knew this thread would get bumped like a motherfucker

Obstructed_View
05-26-2013, 03:26 AM
My thought was that on that play Gasol fell down to draw the Refs' attention to the fact that Duncan 'kicked' the ball, so that was at least partly a flop.
I'm guessing you've never taken a basketball to the nose, especially when it catches you by surprise like that. :)

Legacy
05-26-2013, 03:35 AM
:wow I'm still going to "keep the appropriate fear", tbh. :lol I just realized we have 1 more game to win still. I have to keep that same state of mind that I had during The GS Warriors series... even if I did predict a sweep or Spurs in 5 for this series. I'm scared now. Holy shit!! ... Them bears could come back and chew our asses into a million pieces!! FUCK!!!!!!!!!! :wow

Stabula
05-26-2013, 03:48 AM
Going to bump this again when Duncan gets #5

lefty
05-26-2013, 03:51 AM
338507737526857728

team-work
05-26-2013, 05:29 AM
I'm guessing you've never taken a basketball to the nose, especially when it catches you by surprise like that. :)

As far as I remember, I haven't been stricken in the face by a basketball like that. But it seems there was an exaggeration of the collision. That's why I said it's 'at least partly a flop'.

sehui
05-26-2013, 05:38 AM
hope people learn timvp is just human and he can mistakes, and every thread he makes isn't some type of holy grail - people worship his threads like none other but it's really just another fan's predictions

People can make ESPN blunders too

TJastal
05-26-2013, 07:35 AM
I'm convinced this is a season-long-will-not-admit-anti-reverse-double-anti-jinx persona. Either that or TJastal has hacked LJ's main non-troll account.

Grizz in 7 after down 3-0? Really? Not buying the apocalyptic ish anymore.

F u. I picked the spurs in 5. :p

Obstructed_View
05-26-2013, 08:19 AM
As far as I remember, I haven't been stricken in the face by a basketball like that. But it seems there was an exaggeration of the collision. That's why I said it's 'at least partly a flop'.

Slow motion shows how slow human reflexes are and always looks a bit like a flop. In real time you can see how fast the ball was going. A flop in slow-mo looks HUGELY exaggerated; see Bosh, Chris.

capek
05-26-2013, 09:23 AM
Random thoughts, in no particular order

1. Grizz benefited mightily from opposing team's injuries this post season. BG, RW. They've had a lot go in their favor. You can't say they've looked strong in these POs without that being marginalized somewhat by the opposing team's injuries.

2. As a result of #1, they haven't faced a team with many weapons. For instance the Thunder were SOOOO easy to game plan against without Westbrook. Spurs have way more weapons than any team they've faced.

3. Ya ya ya Conley >>>>>>>>>>>>> Parker, but the Spurs just closed out a series with Parker playing like absolute shit. How can you, in one thread orgasm over the Spurs finally having a legit backup PG in CoJo, and then ignore what that means for this series? Who was the backup PG in '11? Right.

4. Who were the Spurs wings in '11? Right. Who do we have now? Right.

5. Who were all those guys on the Grizz bench in '11 that absolutely killed us? Are any of them on the Grizz now? Right.

Ya, it's troubling to see Tim look increasingly gassed, but he's still putting up good numbers. Tiago looks like he's finally rounding back into shape. Manu is finding ways to contribute even when his shot is not falling. But most importantly we don't have to rely completely on the production of the Big 3 anymore to win playoff games. We have enough other weapons that nobody can score more than 19 in a closeout playoff game, and we can still win by double digits. The last 4 games of the GS series showed that our defense is back and is very solid. Honestly, the I don't think the Grizz can score enough points to beat us 4 out of 7, while we have enough weapons to throw at them that I think it'll just be too much for them to contend with.

I'm expecting 6 tough games, but that the Spurs have enough to get 4 solid wins out of 'em.

Sounds about right. :toast

Better to underestimate how good we are than overestimate how bad we are, tbh

capek
05-26-2013, 09:24 AM
338507737526857728

:lol

team-work
05-26-2013, 10:05 AM
Slow motion shows how slow human reflexes are and always looks a bit like a flop. In real time you can see how fast the ball was going. A flop in slow-mo looks HUGELY exaggerated; see Bosh, Chris.

Thanks for your explanation. I agree with it.

DPG21920
05-26-2013, 10:10 AM
Z-Bo's shooting against the Spurs this season. Spurs lost by 3 in overtime and Tim and Kawhi did not play in the 2nd loss.

5-21
8-15
4-11
4-11

Pretty crazy how this has held up this series. Zbo can turn it on any time, but for the most part, even on his good scoring nights, he has not been efficient. His offensive production has not been enough to put them over the top.

team-work
05-26-2013, 10:21 AM
338507737526857728

Absolutely enjoy the position we are now in. Couldn't have thought it was likely at the very beginning or the end of the regular season.

MaNu4Tres
05-26-2013, 10:27 AM
Pretty crazy how this has held up this series. Zbo can turn it on any time, but for the most part, even on his good scoring nights, he has not been efficient. His offensive production has not been enough to put them over the top.
.
Makes you realize how ridiculously good that 11' Randolph was.

I've been telling people. In 2010, the Phoenix Suns probably put together one of their best 4 game performances in franchise history to beat the Spurs (Spurs were right there every game til the end that series; PHX literally shot and played lights out). Same goes for Memphis in 2011' (hit lightning in a bottle). Then in 2012, the Thunder gets everyone 1-8 to play their A game for 4 straight games (G3-G6).

Spurs literally have been struck by lightning (facing opponents who all seemed to be on fire/the positive side of the law of average theory) the past 3 post-seasons.

Obstructed_View
05-26-2013, 10:35 AM
.
Makes you realize how ridiculously good that 11' Randolph was.
Makes you realize the value of size on your front line. Antonio McDyess and Matt Bonner are amazingly good for opposing bigs' confidence. Z-Bo was hitting threes in that series.

100%duncan
05-26-2013, 10:35 AM
.
Makes you realize how ridiculously good that 11' Randolph was.

I've been telling people. In 2010, the Phoenix Suns probably put together one of their best 4 game performances in franchise history to beat the Spurs (Spurs were right there every game til the end that series; PHX literally shot and played lights out). Same goes for Memphis in 2011' (hit lightning in a bottle). Then in 2012, the Thunder gets everyone 1-8 to play their A game for 4 straight games (G3-G6).

Spurs literally have been struck by lightning (facing opponents who all seemed to be on fire/the positive side of the law of average theory) the past 3 post-seasons.

Now it's time for some Re to the Demption.

Obstructed_View
05-26-2013, 10:37 AM
.
Makes you realize how ridiculously good that 11' Randolph was.

I've been telling people. In 2010, the Phoenix Suns probably put together one of their best 4 game performances in franchise history to beat the Spurs (Spurs were right there every game til the end that series; PHX literally shot and played lights out). Same goes for Memphis in 2011' (hit lightning in a bottle). Then in 2012, the Thunder gets everyone 1-8 to play their A game for 4 straight games (G3-G6).

Spurs literally have been struck by lightning (facing opponents who all seemed to be on fire/the positive side of the law of average theory) the past 3 post-seasons.

http://www.sanctuarymedia.com/edtechexpert/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/you-keep-using-that-word.jpg
:toast

MaNu4Tres
05-26-2013, 10:39 AM
http://www.sanctuarymedia.com/edtechexpert/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/you-keep-using-that-word.jpg
:toast

:lol

As long as you understand my point.

Obstructed_View
05-26-2013, 10:44 AM
:lol

As long as you understand my point.

Apologies if you were being ironical and I whiffed on it. I'm figuratively sick of the misuse of that word, tbh. :)

tlongII
05-26-2013, 10:47 AM
Memphis in 7.

polandprzem
05-26-2013, 10:58 AM
Does LJ stands for Little Johnson?

Whisky Dog
05-26-2013, 11:09 AM
.
Makes you realize how ridiculously good that 11' Randolph was.

I've been telling people. In 2010, the Phoenix Suns probably put together one of their best 4 game performances in franchise history to beat the Spurs (Spurs were right there every game til the end that series; PHX literally shot and played lights out). Same goes for Memphis in 2011' (hit lightning in a bottle). Then in 2012, the Thunder gets everyone 1-8 to play their A game for 4 straight games (G3-G6).

Spurs literally have been struck by lightning (facing opponents who all seemed to be on fire/the positive side of the law of average theory) the past 3 post-seasons.

Or, they finally have the personnel and willingness to be a top defensive grind it out team again. Didn't have that the last 3 seasons, it was all offensive style. We basically became a version of the 2005 Suns until they got back to defense this year.

Canibspur
05-26-2013, 11:10 AM
Are you kidding me Timvp? They have 1 great player in Randolph, and their are times where he gets benched at the end of games because of disputes with his coach. Were not going to lose to Jared Bayless, Tayshaun Prince, and Quincy Pondexter either. We have the much better team. I shouldn't even have to go through the match ups. Seriously, this is not two years ago. We didn't have Leonard or Green, and Splitter never played. That's 3 starters. Were much better. I think everyone is overrating Memphis right now. Remember. Were not the most talented team, but were still TWICE as talented as Memphis.

#CalledIt

rjv
05-26-2013, 11:18 AM
I agree with all the points in this post. :tu

i should have know once tlong agreed with this post, that there was no way timvp was correct about any of his takes.

TimmehC
05-26-2013, 11:38 AM
So is timvp going to start a new thread about how game 4 is a must win?

team-work
05-26-2013, 11:41 AM
Not to take away anything the Spurs has achieved in this year's playoffs. Just wonder what the scenario would be had every team stayed healthy...

"After 2 hard-fought series, we try to convince ourselves the Thunders aren't the favorite in the WCF... with more difficulty."

manufan10
05-26-2013, 12:52 PM
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/401049_560622373984523_2105768999_n.jpg

The San Antonio Spurs (https://www.facebook.com/Spurs?directed_target_id=0) have treated the Grizzlies like welcome mats this series.

GSH
05-26-2013, 01:01 PM
As far as I remember, I haven't been stricken in the face by a basketball like that. But it seems there was an exaggeration of the collision. That's why I said it's 'at least partly a flop'.

If you had, you would remember it. It hurts like a bitch. I've never seen anyone who didn't react about like Gasol did. And you're never looking for it - otherwise you wouldn't let it hit you in the face.

capek
05-26-2013, 01:09 PM
.
Makes you realize how ridiculously good that 11' Randolph was.

I've been telling people. In 2010, the Phoenix Suns probably put together one of their best 4 game performances in franchise history to beat the Spurs (Spurs were right there every game til the end that series; PHX literally shot and played lights out). Same goes for Memphis in 2011' (hit lightning in a bottle). Then in 2012, the Thunder gets everyone 1-8 to play their A game for 4 straight games (G3-G6).

Spurs literally have been struck by lightning (facing opponents who all seemed to be on fire/the positive side of the law of average theory) the past 3 post-seasons.

While that's true of course, the other thing that was the same about the Spurs those seasons, and where the '13 Spurs are different, is defense. Those teams sucked while this one is pretty darn good. If you think about it, the main difference between those series you mention, and this year's GSW series, is that this time we actually had the personel to cool off the other team's players when they started to go off. I guess that's why they say defense wins championships, because without it the opposing teams will, seem like they can hit anything. :tu

therealtruth
05-26-2013, 03:36 PM
Or, they finally have the personnel and willingness to be a top defensive grind it out team again. Didn't have that the last 3 seasons, it was all offensive style. We basically became a version of the 2005 Suns until they got back to defense this year.

It wasn't till he stayed with TD/Splitter that we finally got some separation at the end of the game. TD/Splitter force so many misses around the basket.

Brunodf
05-26-2013, 04:03 PM
.
Makes you realize how ridiculously good that 11' Randolph was.

I've been telling people. In 2010, the Phoenix Suns probably put together one of their best 4 game performances in franchise history to beat the Spurs (Spurs were right there every game til the end that series; PHX literally shot and played lights out). Same goes for Memphis in 2011' (hit lightning in a bottle). Then in 2012, the Thunder gets everyone 1-8 to play their A game for 4 straight games (G3-G6).

Spurs literally have been struck by lightning (facing opponents who all seemed to be on fire/the positive side of the law of average theory) the past 3 post-seasons.
Our D is elite/our frontline is big, nothing to see here

therealtruth
05-26-2013, 07:36 PM
Our D is elite/our frontline is big, nothing to see here

Exactly. After we get eliminated by some "hot shooting" teams you really have to question our defense. Defense is about making the offense uncomfortable and forcing misses. There's no luck or probability to it. We didn't play good enough defense from '10-'12.

3 Legged Dog
05-26-2013, 07:55 PM
Exactly. After we get eliminated by some "hot shooting" teams you really have to question our defense. Defense is about making the offense uncomfortable and forcing misses. There's no luck or probability to it. We didn't play good enough defense from '10-'12.

When it comes to 2012; I disagree. The Spurs got jobbed in the OKC series. Their defense was NOT the problem.

Brunodf
05-26-2013, 08:16 PM
When it comes to 2012; I disagree. The Spurs got jobbed in the OKC series. Their defense was NOT the problem.
The defense was the problem! We had the lead in the 4th in games 4/5/6 but small ball couldn't defend the PnR/get stops

2centsworth
05-26-2013, 09:44 PM
I'll bet you the Spurs will win this series. I love this matchup. I don't see how Memphis scores enough to get it done?

Spurs system will produce enough points.

Now against Miami we are the overwhelming underdog.

Grizzlies have very few question marks? They can't freakin shoot from the outside.

Not easy being this right all the time

Budkin
05-27-2013, 12:13 AM
Fuck the Grizzlies. I hope we break their necks tonight.

hater
05-27-2013, 12:15 AM
Fuck the Grizzlies. I hope we break their necks tonight.

:wow

come on grizz were very respectable opponents. I wish them the best. still I hope spurs can close them out. but IMO spurs in 5 now I guess

Spurs and Mavs fan
05-27-2013, 12:16 AM
I'm more worried about the Heat than the Grizzlies right now.

Budkin
05-27-2013, 12:23 AM
:wow

come on grizz were very respectable opponents. I wish them the best. still I hope spurs can close them out. but IMO spurs in 5 now I guess

This is what I remember of the Grizzlies. Dancing around after humiliating us in 2011. I want to put them out of their misery tonight.

http://blogimages.thescore.com/tbj/files/2011/04/zach-randolph-dancing1.jpg

DMC
05-27-2013, 12:25 AM
I was wrong.











Grizzlies in 7.












Tbh.

I've been ahead of you all season on this project.

DMC
05-27-2013, 12:26 AM
I'm more worried about the Heat than the Grizzlies right now.

No reason to be. Wait until after game one and then the worrying can start, but at least you can decide why you're worrying.

DMC
05-27-2013, 12:27 AM
Does LJ stands for Little Johnson?

No, it's El BJ

pikkiwoki
05-27-2013, 08:22 AM
:lol Antonio Davis

_8oVTRPlKR4

:lmao

Captivus
05-27-2013, 09:47 AM
:lol Antonio Davis

_8oVTRPlKR4

:lmao

Many Spurs fans would have probably agree with him (60%) at that time. We are 3 up, but thats not something anybody anticipated.

timvp
05-27-2013, 01:20 PM
Grizzlies in 7.

iminol
05-27-2013, 01:31 PM
Grizzlies in 7.

http://i1.memy.pl/obrazki/bde5192402_.jpg

polandprzem
05-27-2013, 02:07 PM
Grizzlies in 7.
Bad defense of yours


You rather make a typical thread and your thoughts

hater
05-27-2013, 10:47 PM
:cry

Bruno
05-27-2013, 10:47 PM
bump

timvp
05-27-2013, 10:49 PM
:smokin

DAF86
05-27-2013, 10:49 PM
If the Spurs are healthy/have enough in the tank they should win in 5 or 6. Memphis is one of the worst shooting teams in the entire NBA, with a decent game plan (like the one we used against LAL) we should be able to exploit this mayor weakness. Also, after that 2011 series Tony has dominated Conley in personal matchups. Spurs have won 4 out of the last 6 against Memphis and those two Grizzlies wins have been pretty damn close and we were missing key guys.

This was all there was to it, tbh.

DAF86
05-27-2013, 10:50 PM
:smokin

GTFO trying to make it seem like you were trolling all along. :lmao

GSH
05-27-2013, 10:51 PM
If the Spurs win 4 more games, this will go down as one of the classic threads of all time.

dbreiden83080
05-27-2013, 10:51 PM
:smokin


I expect the same thread for the Heat..

We got no shot...

Bruno
05-27-2013, 10:56 PM
Grizzlies ended this series with a combined 135/354 on field goals.

That's a .381 FG%. :wow

Samr.
05-27-2013, 11:00 PM
So rational. So well thought-out. And soooooooo wrong.

Timvp, no matter how experienced you are, everyone can always learn. You bought into the hype. No one expected the Spurs sweep, but at the same time, looking at this series realistically, Spurs were just better. I fell victim to the grizzlies hype too. I thought Spurs in 5-6, and fell guilty to not watching them myself; turns out, they have no offense, and I underestimated how much of a liability that would be.

Lesson learned for the both of us.

jeebus
05-27-2013, 11:01 PM
timvp with the historic bads

superjames1992
05-27-2013, 11:04 PM
Grizzlies in 9, tbh... :lol

timvp
05-27-2013, 11:04 PM
Grizzlies in 9

:tu

Arcadian
05-27-2013, 11:05 PM
:lol

Kori Ellis
05-27-2013, 11:06 PM
timvp playing the pessimist role in the playoffs for the first time in his life is paying off. LOL Usually he "believes" when no one else does.

He better predict the Spurs get steamrolled in The Finals.

tuncaboylu
05-27-2013, 11:14 PM
Parker did it:)

TE
05-27-2013, 11:15 PM
Not too mention a Clippers team that was running on fumes...Memphis is one of the more overrated teams in some time tbh...
tbh

LkrFan
05-27-2013, 11:17 PM
:lolP

ShoogarBear
05-27-2013, 11:18 PM
http://www.nationalsportsbeat.com/images/logos/nba/Memphis_Grizzlies.jpg

2020 NBA Champions

(unless Duncan's still playing)

dbreiden83080
05-27-2013, 11:22 PM
It's amazing how much people overrated the Grizzlies, for beating a OKC team without their all star PG..

SA210
05-27-2013, 11:23 PM
:lmao

Sweep, and yup I predicted it..:tu

tesseractive
05-27-2013, 11:23 PM
timvp playing the pessimist role in the playoffs for the first time in his life is paying off. LOL Usually he "believes" when no one else does.

He better predict the Spurs get steamrolled in The Finals.

:lol :tu

tesseractive
05-27-2013, 11:25 PM
:lmao

Sweep, and yup I predicted it..:tu

Well done.

I had us sweeping Golden State and beating Memphis in 6. Oops. :lol

Stabula
05-27-2013, 11:32 PM
:lol this thread

milkyway21
05-27-2013, 11:32 PM
he was just bluffing :lol

I didn't believe it then that he had doubts. Maybe just scared of our old & injury-prone team

just keep healthy Spurs :flag:

therealtruth
05-27-2013, 11:54 PM
No one else thought it could be a Spurs sweep with the Grizzlies lack of perimeter offense? We used the same strategy against the Lakers and it resulted in a sweep.

SA210
05-27-2013, 11:56 PM
http://www.lolception.com/lollibs/memeimgs/67513902.jpg?_cfgetx=img.rx:500;

timvp
05-28-2013, 12:07 AM
This is my favorite thread ever, tbh. I've never seen SpursTalk so galvanized :wow

DPG21920
05-28-2013, 12:08 AM
Tim swept both Gasol brothers in the same playoff :lol

drpill
05-28-2013, 12:23 AM
This is the wrongest timvp's been since the time he tried to convince me that ATLiens was a better album than Aquemini.*

* - may or may not have actually happened.

ViceCity84
05-28-2013, 12:35 AM
I had Spurs in 5 for the record.Parker put that scrub Conley in his place unlike 2011.
Zbo 2011 was 1 hit wonder.
Timvp lol

Yuixafun
05-28-2013, 01:44 AM
I think Parker goes berserk this series.

He knows out of the Big three he has the most life left.

He's not that stumbling kid who got pulled for Claxton, or collapsed against packed the paint defenses.. or the Eva's playboy, or the club fighter/promoter.

He's mature, full grown, he remembers what it is to be a champion, and his spirit has a burning desire to feel it once again. I just have this notion that Parker is hungering for redemption and validation, to prove himself at this season in his manhood. But not just for himself.

For Pop, for Teemy, for Manu... for San Antonio, for the next generation spurs that will be his to lead, for France lol...

Sensational series for TP!

Manufan909
05-28-2013, 02:03 AM
timvp playing the pessimist role in the playoffs for the first time in his life is paying off. LOL Usually he "believes" when no one else does.

He better predict the Spurs get steamrolled in The Finals.

This.

Sean Cagney
05-28-2013, 02:07 AM
:lmao

Sweep, and yup I predicted it..:tu

COT DAMN YOU DID!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is the wrongest timvp's been since the time he tried to convince me that ATLiens was a better album than Aquemini.*

* - may or may not have actually happened.
ATLIENS is better! I agree with him!


The thing is though Mobb Deeps the INFAMOUS is better than both of those there ;)
:hat

hater
05-28-2013, 02:08 AM
so when regular posters jump the cliff they are frontrunning bandwagoning faggots, but when the owner of the site cliff jumps, he's playing a pessimist role

:rolleyes

RD2191
05-28-2013, 02:10 AM
so when regular posters jump the cliff they are frontrunning bandwagoning faggots, but when the owner of the site cliff jumps, he's playing a pessimist role

:rolleyes

timvp
05-28-2013, 02:11 AM
so when regular posters jump the cliff they are frontrunning bandwagoning faggots, but when the owner of the site cliff jumps, he's playing a pessimist role

:rolleyes

capek
05-28-2013, 02:25 AM
This is my favorite thread ever, tbh. I've never seen SpursTalk so galvanized :wow

Imagine if in the new Star Trek movie Captain Kirk decides to join forces with Sherlock Holmes. That's what it felt like! :cry

Horry Hipcheck
05-28-2013, 02:28 AM
It's amazing how much people overrated the Grizzlies, for beating a OKC team without their all star PG..

To be fair to Memphis, they did a stellar job imposing their will against OKC, who just could not find a rhythm without Westbrook. It made them look good, but they also got to play their game. The Spurs slammed that door shut on them.

mosdef17
05-28-2013, 03:25 AM
Cool thread, bro.

-21-
05-28-2013, 03:45 AM
I'm so happy timvp was wrong.

pikkiwoki
05-28-2013, 06:55 AM
:blah

6lk3AOzDKR8

http://i.imgur.com/EvnwFcU.jpg

Stabula
05-28-2013, 07:10 AM
Grizzlies were garbage and one of the worst teams to see the WCF in some time

Old School 44
05-28-2013, 07:27 AM
This is my favorite thread ever, tbh. I've never seen SpursTalk so galvanized :wow

You should start this one. "Someone Convince Me The Heat Shouldn't Be The Overwhelming Favorite in the Finals"

letmk
05-28-2013, 07:34 AM
:blah

6lk3AOzDKR8

http://i.imgur.com/EvnwFcU.jpg

Could they be more wrong? No, Timmy and Tony are the two best players in this series. I knew that even before WCF was played. Everybody is high on Gasol, but if Timmy was having a 14.1ppg/7.8rpg/1.7blkpg season, they would say Timmy should have retired. After this series, I become to like Gasol more as he is such a hard worker and a classy player. But he is not better than Timmy even at this age.

Granted, picking ZBo and Gasol might be a popular choice given they played well against Clippers and Thunder. But picking Conley over Tony? On the other hand, while boasting one of the best starting lineups in NBA when healthy, that Manu-led benches are not as reliable as before is one of the biggest question marks for this Spurs team. Yet, they got everything totally the opposite way.

I don't know whether it's because they genuinely believe in what they said (which doesn't bode well about their knowledge), or because they were former Spurs so not to be favoring Spurs (which raises questions about their objectivity). Still, picking Grizzlies to win is fine. But their analyses are totally out of sorts.

pikkiwoki
05-28-2013, 08:02 AM
You should start this one. "Someone Convince Me The Heat Shouldn't Be The Overwhelming Favorite in the Finals"

Can timvp's anti-jinx powers overcome Skip Baseless' Kiss of Death?

339226146111627265

TJastal
05-28-2013, 08:38 AM
:lmao

Sweep, and yup I predicted it..:tu

Nice call, SA210!

SA210
05-28-2013, 08:49 AM
Nice call, SA210!

:tu

bigfan
05-28-2013, 08:55 AM
Bayless is such an asshat. I bet him and Stephen A. Smith give each other knobbers during commercial breaks.

SA210
05-28-2013, 09:15 AM
http://gamedayr.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/san-antonio-spurs-2013-nba-finals-memes1.jpg

quentin_compson
05-29-2013, 07:11 PM
Grizz in 9.

Seriously, though, I never would have thought of the Spurs actually sweeping the Grizzzlies.
Going into the series, the whole thing was pretty much 50-50 to me. And let's not forget there were two OT games in this series. Still, down the stretch in close games, it was so evident that San Antonio just had the better personnel to create and execute good looks. And were we really all so sure that the Spurs would be the more disciplined team defensively, too? I for one was not.

This is probably not the proper thread to say this, but it's just so great that these guys reached the finals once again and have the chance to compete for a championship. To do that with this kind of team basketball is all the more beautiful.

capek
06-03-2013, 10:15 AM
Nothing to see here. My memory's hazy from years of being a pothead, and couldn't believe that I actually remembered correctly that timvp had given up on the Spurs in the last round. But damn, looks like my memory's better than I give it credit for; :lmao @ Grizz being the overwhelming favorite :lmao

rascal
06-03-2013, 11:39 AM
You would think timvp was the word of GOD by the reaction in here.

moisaenz
06-03-2013, 01:09 PM
The worst take in this series was that conley's play was going to level with Parker's, yeah right...it just shows how an underrated Parker is being compared to Conley. Even conley said he wishes to play like parker in the future.

hater
06-03-2013, 02:49 PM
2. this looks like it'll be a disastrous series for TP

3. Ginobili going up against Tony Allen would be a tall task

6. Diaw, Bonner are poor matchups against a physical frontline.

9. and I can't make a strong case for the Spurs having a better offense or defense right now.

I want to believe -- but as I'm sitting here right now, I just can't do it by any logical means. I'm sorry.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

313
06-03-2013, 02:56 PM
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

:lmao Tim Duncan sucks :lmao

capek
06-03-2013, 03:45 PM
The worst take in this series was that conley's play was going to level with Parker's, yeah right...it just shows how an underrated Parker is being compared to Conley. Even conley said he wishes to play like parker in the future.

Well not exactly; it shows how much Parker has improved his game the last two years. Conley owned Parker in '11, but this year he didn't even look in the same league as Tony.

UNT Eagles 2016
04-12-2017, 09:05 PM
Let's not forget Parsons is out as well.

UNT Eagles 2016
04-12-2017, 09:06 PM
whoops, wrong thread

SAGirl
04-13-2017, 12:58 AM
Wow what a necropost that was from Nono!
I don't go way back but he fooled everyone lol
:toast

LaMarcus Bryant
04-13-2017, 11:11 AM
timvp used to drop huge filthy loads like this on occasion

Horse
04-15-2017, 09:11 PM
Oh this is a gem

TheGreatYacht
04-24-2017, 12:12 AM
:wow