View Full Version : Bucks: Unveil New Logos/Unis
BatManu20
04-14-2015, 06:05 PM
For the 2015/16 Season.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCg5LuzUEAAv7sQ.jpg
Only shot available of the new unis. Will be unveiled later.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCkLSRIWMAAriu3.jpg
BatManu20
04-14-2015, 06:07 PM
587817244727447552
BatManu20
04-14-2015, 06:11 PM
Once you notice the "M" in the neck, it can't be unseen, tbh.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CChFUW5WEAAPBbB.jpg:large
Jamal should be their logo imho
lil'mo
04-14-2015, 06:23 PM
Once you notice the "M" in the neck, it can't be unseen, tbh.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CChFUW5WEAAPBbB.jpg:large
And the basketball formed by the lower antlers. Pretty badass logo.
Malik Hairston
04-14-2015, 06:25 PM
Much better than the atrocious rumored logo from a few weeks ago, tbh..
BatManu20
04-14-2015, 06:29 PM
Yea I actually really like these new logos. They're a significant upgradehttp://cdncache-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/) over their current ones and the ones they had before those.
TheCultOfPersonality
04-14-2015, 09:03 PM
That's a mean looking deer.
Silver&Black
04-14-2015, 09:24 PM
I approve...
:tu nice new logo
01Snake
04-14-2015, 09:33 PM
http://thebachelorguy.com/images/blogs/jagerlabel.jpg
baseline bum
04-14-2015, 09:46 PM
The jersey is horrible
Spurs9
04-14-2015, 10:17 PM
I like those colors.
gambit1990
04-14-2015, 11:16 PM
not good enough.
gambit1990
04-14-2015, 11:18 PM
they've had a shitty color scheme since i've been a fan of the nba.
DAF86
04-14-2015, 11:20 PM
Let's all agree that with the Bucks colors scheme and logo there isn't much you can do in terms of cool looking stuff.
Sean Cagney
04-15-2015, 12:36 AM
And the basketball formed by the lower antlers. Pretty badass logo.
That logo is bad ass, agreed.
The jersey is horrible
I like the logo and the other stuff above, but the jersey is pretty bad.
Infinite_limit
04-15-2015, 12:56 AM
The issue is their 3rd color
90s: Purple
2000s: Red
Now: Blue?
What's wrong with just green and gold? 3rd color should be black, white or grey.
8FOR!3
04-15-2015, 11:51 AM
The jersey would be nice if "BUCKS" wasn't outlined in blue. It even looks good on the sleeves but not on Bucks.
BatManu20
04-15-2015, 12:11 PM
Wizards new primary logo. Should go back to the Bullets, tbh.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCpfeEnW0AAq4RL.jpg
Aztecfan03
04-15-2015, 01:06 PM
Wizards new primary logo. Should go back to the Bullets, tbh.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCpfeEnW0AAq4RL.jpg
why is there a sword or obelisk in there?
The Gemini Method
04-15-2015, 01:15 PM
why is there a sword or obelisk in there? Oh its an obelisk? Thought it was symbolism as to how Washington D.C. keeps anal raping the citizenry? It's for the George Washington monument, yo.
Aztecfan03
04-15-2015, 01:49 PM
Oh its an obelisk? Thought it was symbolism as to how Washington D.C. keeps anal raping the citizenry? It's for the George Washington monument, yo.
They don't even have anything to do with Wizards in their logo though. THey need that if they are called the wizards.
Pelicans78
04-15-2015, 01:51 PM
Bucks change logos and colors every few years.
BatManu20
06-01-2015, 07:44 PM
Hawks new primary logo:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGbNozNVAAAMUO7.jpg
DJR210
06-01-2015, 07:54 PM
Hawks new primary logo:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGbNozNVAAAMUO7.jpg
The Hawks have so many good looks that they could go back to IMO.. I even like the red and black ones with the Hawk across the chess they worse in like 95 for a couple of seasons.
Splits
06-01-2015, 08:01 PM
Sixers new logo:
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--GJeA0LEn--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/782139313146419523.jpg
Yes, that's Ben Franklin. Or supposed to be...
stxspurs
06-01-2015, 08:30 PM
bucks logo is horrible...they just shouldnt exist
Thread
06-01-2015, 08:39 PM
bucks logo is horrible...they just shouldnt exist
And if that were true I'd be down 18-16.
Splits
06-01-2015, 08:42 PM
And if that were true I'd be down 18-16.
Minny: 5
Thread
06-01-2015, 08:54 PM
Minny: 5
Crawl, motherfucker, crawl!!!
Splits
06-01-2015, 08:56 PM
Crawl, motherfucker, crawl!!!
http://stewthornley.net/lakers_4748.jpg
Thread
06-01-2015, 09:12 PM
http://stewthornley.net/lakers_4748.jpg
Absolutely.
Splits
06-01-2015, 09:14 PM
Absolutely.
Where are the blacks?
http://www.realclearsports.com/images/wysiwyg_images/landmarkrelocations/minnlakers.jpg
Thread
06-01-2015, 09:15 PM
Where are the blacks?
http://www.realclearsports.com/images/wysiwyg_images/landmarkrelocations/minnlakers.jpg
In their place.
Mitch
06-01-2015, 09:19 PM
http://stewthornley.net/lakers_4748.jpg
Do you think we should give the titles back to the Timberwolves, Splits?
Thread
06-01-2015, 09:21 PM
Do you think we should give the titles back to the Timberwolves, Splits?
The Celtics tried to revive that debate before the '10 playoffs. Trying to set the table, get the train started. Before you know it,,,they were following us back out to California---the middle of June.
tee, hee.
baseline bum
06-01-2015, 09:35 PM
And if that were true I'd be down 18-16.
What's this 16 talk, you're stuck at O & 47, thank you Steve Nash for that flop.
baseline bum
06-01-2015, 09:36 PM
Where are the blacks?
http://www.realclearsports.com/images/wysiwyg_images/landmarkrelocations/minnlakers.jpg
There is one hanging from the opposite rim.
Mitch
06-01-2015, 10:09 PM
The Celtics tried to revive that debate before the '10 playoffs. Trying to set the table, get the train started. Before you know it,,,they were following us back out to California---the middle of June.
tee, hee.
Makes no sense, Cub, the city didn't win the titles - the team did. Yet some want the Wolves to inherit titles over twice as old as their franchise.
Thread
06-01-2015, 10:16 PM
Makes no sense, Cub, the city didn't win the titles - the team did. Yet some want the Wolves to inherit titles over twice as old as their franchise.
They can want in one hand and shit in the other. See which one gets full first.
We got 16 and we ain't giving a single, solitary one up. No.
Mitch
06-01-2015, 10:22 PM
They can want in one hand and shit in the other. See which one gets full first.
We got 16 and we ain't giving a single, solitary one up. No.
Cub
Caltex2
06-01-2015, 10:23 PM
Hawks new primary logo:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGbNozNVAAAMUO7.jpg
That's not new.
Given the history of the Buicks (yes, the Buicks) in the last 25 years, this may make for a better logo.
http://www.unionsportsmen.org/site/assets/images/uploads/deer_on_wall_2.jpg
LakerHater
06-01-2015, 10:52 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGTNcSvUkAA4WTF.jpg:small (http://twitter.com/conradburry/status/604834145550745600/photo/1)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGTNczYU8AAVvET.jpg:small (http://twitter.com/conradburry/status/604834145550745600/photo/1)
DPG21920
06-01-2015, 10:57 PM
That is ugly IMO ^
baseline bum
06-01-2015, 11:15 PM
They can want in one hand and shit in the other. See which one gets full first.
We got 16 and we ain't giving a single, solitary one up. No.
If the Wolves can't inherit the five from Minneapolis what makes you think Suns fan can inherit 16?
baseline bum
06-01-2015, 11:19 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGTNcSvUkAA4WTF.jpg:small (http://twitter.com/conradburry/status/604834145550745600/photo/1)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGTNczYU8AAVvET.jpg:small (http://twitter.com/conradburry/status/604834145550745600/photo/1)
Damn that looks horrible. How can they do that? They had one of the best sports logos ever.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/b7/52/87/b7528777cf2d3e6191d88270f20e1b61.jpg
BatManu20
06-02-2015, 01:06 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGTNcSvUkAA4WTF.jpg:small (http://twitter.com/conradburry/status/604834145550745600/photo/1)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGTNczYU8AAVvET.jpg:small (http://twitter.com/conradburry/status/604834145550745600/photo/1)
This is easily the worst logo/uniform combo in the NBA if these really is the new Clippers' branding. Complete shit, tbh.
BatManu20
06-02-2015, 01:12 AM
Got damn if the Clips really go with this as their new logo, they will take two steps back from the small step forward they took this year as a franchise :lol
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGWwE1xWwAAZkC0.jpg
605155742006407168
Caltex2
06-02-2015, 10:36 AM
Given the Bucks play over the last 25 years, this may also make for a good logo.
http://m.c.lnkd.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/6/005/09a/10b/0ad9c37.jpg
Sixers new logo:
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--GJeA0LEn--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/782139313146419523.jpg
Yes, that's Ben Franklin. Or supposed to be...
Is this for serious?
Splits
06-02-2015, 02:36 PM
Is this for serious?
Uh huh:
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--WqKIRR6y--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/1249080041467044135.png
Uh huh:
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--WqKIRR6y--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/1249080041467044135.png
That's just....wow.
Findog
06-02-2015, 05:57 PM
That Clipper logo is a big pile of doodoo. This would've been so much better:
http://i.imgur.com/E9nECwy.png?2
http://i.imgur.com/C1tXhhK.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/lV26SAh.png
Caltex2
06-02-2015, 06:17 PM
That logo would have resembled the Portland Pilots too much:
http://collegevisits.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Portland.jpg
https://pilots.up.edu/image/image_gallery?uuid=52f55337-61b3-490d-bd96-37de50124125&groupId=2789221&t=1378159736684
As a matter of fact if it were red and/or blue, the second logo actually works better for the Clippers because it make it more obvious to people that a clipper is a ship.
Patrick Bateman
06-05-2015, 12:25 AM
Sixers new logo:
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--GJeA0LEn--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/782139313146419523.jpg
Yes, that's Ben Franklin. Or supposed to be...
Looks more like that cocksucker Mike Francesa from WFAN or wherever he is now. Terrible
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.