Evidence of jesus and the Bible

[LittleCriminal]

Is there any?
Can somebody post something/anything that proves without a doubt god is real??
Im losing my faith...

[bigzak25]

I don't know man, how about the fact that this site is mostly non believing a holes and yet every other thread is about God and Jesus. Lol.

[spurraider21]

I don't know man, how about the fact that this site is mostly non believing a holes and yet every other thread is about God and Jesus. Lol.
damn heretics :depressed

[BacktoBasics]

Is there any?
Can somebody post something/anything that proves without a doubt god is real??
Im losing my faith...Yes. No. So what.

[Koolaid_Man]

Is there any?
Can somebody post something/anything that proves without a doubt god is real??
Im losing my faith...


This young lady explains her experience of how I helped her turn her life around...when I saw her waiting tables in a restaurant offered her a job...and came to pick her up in my white van that said " jesus saves" on the side and convinced her to leave her boyfriend...:lol

IMeJh_c7MaQ

[Koolaid_Man]

cOYgcvWdt5M

[DMC]

It's quite likely a goofy rabbi existed who was killed for some crime against religion, and that he had 12 followers. There have been many over the years. So what? What if he lived, and died, and what if he was resurrected and walked among us? What he he did all sorts of miracles. How does any of that support his doctrine?

And there's been no convincing evidence to support the existence of any deity, much less one who gives a shit about what you draw.

[LittleCriminal]

Yes. No. So what.

I see a whole bunch of no.. None of the yes...and so what.

[LittleCriminal]

This young lady explains her experience of how I helped her turn her life around...when I saw her waiting tables in a restaurant offered her a job...and came to pick her up in my white van that said " jesus saves" on the side and convinced her to leave her boyfriend...:lol

IMeJh_c7MaQ

This is not proof god lived and or existed.. I want proof.. Not some stupid slut talking about stupid shit.

[Joseph Kony]

there is literally no proof unless you are a fucktard who attributes what science cannot yet explain must somehow prove god exists or you want to bend and twist interpretations of fairy tale books. there is literally zero real evidence of any god. there's a reason they claim to rely on "faith" which is literally belief without evidence

[BacktoBasics]

I see a whole bunch of no.. None of the yes...and so what.There's no shortage of evidence. That's always been the case. Its that the evidence piece by piece isn't particularly strong. Not a good sign when it takes so many small pieces of evidence in order to justify a conclusion vs. a single indisputable piece.

[DMC]

There's no shortage of evidence. That's always been the case. Its that the evidence piece by piece isn't particularly strong. Not a good sign when it takes so many small pieces of evidence in order to justify a conclusion vs. a single indisputable piece.
Especially when the conclusion is made a priori.

[Joseph Kony]

"no shortage of evidence"

:lmao okay.

[DMC]

"no shortage of evidence"

:lmao okay.

Just shortage of a defendant.

Religion and it's followers are still, thousands of years and all the power later, trying to tidy up their doctrine. They don't have time for existential arguments. Any time you see an argument about the existence of god, at least three things happen:

1. It's argued that you cannot disprove god's existence
2. Religion's merits are argued
3. Atheism is labeled a religion in a "tu quoque" style argument.

Then it digresses to faith and you'll be prayed for, which is a welcomed change since religion has preyed ON us for most of history.

[Sportcamper]

The terms anno Domini… (A.D.) and before Christ…(B.C.) are used to label or number years in the Julian and Gregorian calendars….The term anno Domini is Medieval Latin, which means in the year of the Lord but is often translated as in the year of our Lord….It is occasionally set out more fully as anno Domini nostri Iesu (or Jesu) Christi ("in the year of Our Lord Jesus Christ")

So basically we measure time Before Christ & After…

[pgardn]

This young lady explains her experience of how I helped her turn her life around...when I saw her waiting tables in a restaurant offered her a job...and came to pick her up in my white van that said " jesus saves" on the side and convinced her to leave her boyfriend...:lol

IMeJh_c7MaQ

Pretty girl. Bad family life. No self confidence and not exactly smart. = very tough life


So for her, some guidance in whatever form, is a good thing.
Seems pretty simple.

[Avante]

I don't buy the Bible stories, I think we are seeing something close to Homer/mythology there. Stories that were written by man, not unlike all the myths. Obviously we can't have the Bible and the Koran, yep, both total bullshit.

But.....


I do believe in there is "something" so far beyond our human limitations we simply can't fathom it. We are still stuck on...."oh yeah, well prove it", because we are simple. There is no doubt we didn't...BANG!!!!!!!!!! or just happen by chance. So there is "something" that designed all this, and it should be obvious. What that is we really have no idea so we make shit up trying to explain it, us humans need an explanation for everything. This being the one we can't explain.

Imagine what people thought seeing that old moon just hanging there. It had to be..."how is this possible?" We are there as far as God goes.

[Avante]

I get this impressioin all those we see here all worried about God/Bible/religion don't say shit about it to all those they know who do believe in some God which is most people. So they come herre to hide and talk about it.

I'd bet 90% of those...bah humbuggers....came from religious families.

The bottom line is real simple, most people simply want more than this so they have it because it makes them feel better about life. They don't care about you little shits with your...."oh yeah, well can ya prove it, huh huh huh?" they see you guys as poor little fucks who need help.

Notice how most these atheists are pricks?

[clambake]

does this mean you're not ready to school us on adam and eve?

[boutons_deux]

I look forward to any and all evidence for Jesus OUTSIDE of the early centuries' relentless Christian marketing strategy.

[Warlord23]

4 x 100 m relay ...

Lane 1: Adam, Eve, Methuselah, Noah
Lane 2: Abraham, Job, Ishmael, Moses
Lane 3: Samson, David, Solomon, Jacob
Lane 4: Jesus, John the Baptist, Mary Magdalene, Lazarus
Lane 5: Talking Snake, Cain, Jezebel, Judas
Lane 6: Lucifer, Baal, Mammon, The Whore of Babylon

Who wins tbh?

[Parker2112]

Almost all major world religions acknowledge Jesus's role in history. Islam, Judaism, Christianity and even some secular people. Even those who despise him acknowledge him.

There is recorded evidence of his existence, his ministry, and his death. The Jews despise his teachings but they acknowledge him readily.

Most of all, the truth He brought to this world, the truth that is still feeding countless numbers of people, physically and spiritually, is a testament to his existence and his divine nature.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_perspectives_on_Jesus
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus

[Parker2112]

Watch "Is Jesus Real? - Non-biblical Evidence of His Existence" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/4bLlpiWh9-k

[Parker2112]

"Everyone says the Bible is written by men, but the Bible says it was men who were directly inspired by God. But I didn't believe it for a minute. So I start reading and I start discovering and you have 66 books written by 40 different authors spread over three different continents, in three different languages, over a 2,000-year period. Most of the authors did not know each other, had no knowledge of each other, but yet I see consistently that they're not just answering each other's questions, they're finishing each other's sentences. It was mind-boggling, the deeper I got into it, and one day it hit me like a shot. I'm reading the living word of a living God. After that, I was just scratching the surface. Then, when you get even deeper into it, it's beyond comprehension.

"I cannot say it strongly enough. It is beyond impossible that it could've been written by men. I'm a writer, and even the writers that I know that I admire, I look at how we write, I know what our limitations are, and, like I said, it's so far beyond our comprehension."

[Clipper Nation]

Jesus was a real person. Jesus in the Bible is a heavily fictionalized version of him. The Bible in general is a weird combination of history and fairy tales, edited in a slapdash manner.

[BatManu20]

Here's your proof.


http://www.atheist-meme.com/resources/Observable%20universe%20-%20DON'T%20MASTURBATE.jpg.opt724x6516o0,0s724x6516 .jpg

[Parker2112]

John 10 24
'The Jews*who were there gathered around him, saying, “How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Messiah, tell us plainly.”

25*Jesus answered,*“I did tell you,*but you do not believe. The works I do in my Father’s name testify about me,26*but you do not believe because you are not my sheep.27*My sheep listen to my voice; I know them,*and they follow me.*28*I give them eternal life,*and they shall never perish;*no one will snatch them out of my hand.*29*My Father, who has given them to me,*is greater than all[c];*no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand.*30*I and the Father are one.”'

[Parker2112]

Get in where you fit in tbh.

[tlongII]

Almost all major world religions acknowledge Jesus's role in history. Islam, Judaism, Christianity and even some secular people. Even those who despise him acknowledge him.

There is recorded evidence of his existence, his ministry, and his death. The Jews despise his teachings but they acknowledge him readily.

Most of all, the truth He brought to this world, the truth that is still feeding countless numbers of people, physically and spiritually, is a testament to his existence and his divine nature.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_perspectives_on_Jesus
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus

False.

[tbdog]

False.

^ That is correct. There little to no evidence that Jesus the man existed. The best evidence that Christians point to are historians who wrote decades after his supposed death. If Jesus did exist and his doctrine was true, where he had the infinite most important message for man kind (it is infinitely the most important because our souls have an eternity afterlife), then is an incompetent god. And a incompetent god deserve no praise.

[BacktoBasics]

"no shortage of evidence"

:lmao okay.Laugh all you want. Evidence is evidence even if its 3-4-5 times removed from origin. Don't get me wrong I don't believe in religion. I don't buy any of it...at least not in the context that most bible thumpers do and certainly not the accepted modern interpretations. But I'm not ignorant enough to act as if there's no evidence or that some of it doesn't corroborate on an elemental level. That doesn't mean its to be believed or that it somehow equates to facts.

[Blake]

"Everyone says the Bible is written by men, but the Bible says it was men who were directly inspired by God. But I didn't believe it for a minute. So I start reading and I start discovering and you have 66 books written by 40 different authors spread over three different continents, in three different languages, over a 2,000-year period. Most of the authors did not know each other, had no knowledge of each other, but yet I see consistently that they're not just answering each other's questions, they're finishing each other's sentences. It was mind-boggling, the deeper I got into it, and one day it hit me like a shot. I'm reading the living word of a living God. After that, I was just scratching the surface. Then, when you get even deeper into it, it's beyond comprehension.

"I cannot say it strongly enough. It is beyond impossible that it could've been written by men. I'm a writer, and even the writers that I know that I admire, I look at how we write, I know what our limitations are, and, like I said, it's so far beyond our comprehension."

Lol

[tbdog]

"Everyone says the Bible is written by men, but the Bible says it was men who were directly inspired by God. But I didn't believe it for a minute. So I start reading and I start discovering and you have 66 books written by 40 different authors spread over three different continents, in three different languages, over a 2,000-year period. Most of the authors did not know each other, had no knowledge of each other, but yet I see consistently that they're not just answering each other's questions, they're finishing each other's sentences. It was mind-boggling, the deeper I got into it, and one day it hit me like a shot. I'm reading the living word of a living God. After that, I was just scratching the surface. Then, when you get even deeper into it, it's beyond comprehension.

"I cannot say it strongly enough. It is beyond impossible that it could've been written by men. I'm a writer, and even the writers that I know that I admire, I look at how we write, I know what our limitations are, and, like I said, it's so far beyond our comprehension."

It is easy to put the puzzle together when you have other material to copy over. It is like saying that star wars books must be real because they are written by different authors yet there is consistency in them.

[I. Hustle]

Geez. Another thread? Don't you guys get tired of this?

So what if people don't believe in any sort of religion? That is their right. If your religion is the right one then they will have to answer when they die. If they are right, then no harm no foul.

And why can't people believe in something without you anti-religious people bashing them so much. Let's be honest, it's not like they are going to have any power to make changes. Yes, I know that politicians use them for their agendas but if it isn't religion then it will just turn around and be something else. What does it benefit you to be so condescending, insulting and rude?


In the end, both groups look like idiots and no changes have been made. You want to change someone's views? Then be an example. Telling them how stupid they are usually isn't the best way to get your point across.

[I. Hustle]

The reason that idiot from Kentucky is getting so much press is because of other morons like 2ndPFGoat. If a complaint would have been filed and she would have just been jailed, yes she would have made a scene but what fuels it is the death threats and all the personal attacks on her. Those idiots that are doing that are making her a martyr and now she is somewhat of a legend for people that believe like she does.

The only good thing about this thread is that I see my homie Back2Basics back in this mother.

[Blake]

The reason that idiot from Kentucky is getting so much press is because of other morons like 2ndPFGoat. If a complaint would have been filed and she would have just been jailed, yes she would have made a scene but what fuels it is the death threats and all the personal attacks on her. Those idiots that are doing that are making her a martyr and now she is somewhat of a legend for people that believe like she does.

The only good thing about this thread is that I see my homie Back2Basics back in this mother.

Don't be disingenuous by leaving out the Christians that are making her martyr for getting jailed.

Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz showed up to fuel the story to pander to the religious nut voters.

[SpursforSix]

It is easy to put the puzzle together when you have other material to copy over. It is like saying that star wars books must be real because they are written by different authors yet there is consistency in them.

that's a terrible analogy.

[Blake]

that's a terrible analogy.

If he's talking about all the Star Wars books out there and not just the movies, I think it's a pretty solid analogy.

[SpursforSix]

If he's talking about all the Star Wars books out there and not just the movies, I think it's a pretty solid analogy.

if he's assuming the movies had nothing to do with it, then he's retarded

[Blake]

if he's assuming the movies had nothing to do with it, then he's retarded

nothing to do with what?

[I. Hustle]

Don't be disingenuous by leaving out the Christians that are making her martyr for getting jailed.

Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz showed up to fuel the story to pander to the religious nut voters.

I agree with that. She always got an interview on national television because of all the death threats and the insults she receives. She was able to have a bigger platform to shed her tears and talk about how she is being persecuted because people have decided to constantly attack her.

Do you really think that hers was the first religious rally? Do you think she would have gotten as much air time if it was just a one sided affair?

[I. Hustle]

The writing. Even I followed that one

[Blake]

I agree with that. She always got an interview on national television because of all the death threats and the insults she receives. She was able to have a bigger platform to shed her tears and talk about how she is being persecuted because people have decided to constantly attack her.

Do you really think that hers was the first religious rally? Do you think she would have gotten as much air time if it was just a one sided affair?

lol "because people have decided to attack her"

if the bigot had obeyed the law and done her job from the beginning, there'd be no story.

[SpursforSix]

if he's assuming the movies had nothing to do with it, then he's retarded


nothing to do with what?


The writing. Even I followed that one

[Blake]

i asked to make sure because I don't see how it's relevant to the point. Why does it matter that the movie influenced the books?

[I. Hustle]

i asked to make sure because I don't see how it's relevant to the point. Why does it matter that the movie influenced the books?

I think he is saying that because they didn't have movies to watch in biblical times. They might have though. I wasn't there.

[I. Hustle]

lol "because people have decided to attack her"

if the bigot had obeyed the law and done her job from the beginning, there'd be no story.

Right, I agree. At what point in history though has everyone obeyed the law? My point was that the story was made even bigger than it should have been. Nothing wrong with protesting for her to go to jail and to be impeached but everything else was unnecessary.

Are you saying that she wasn't attacked? I'm not saying she is right in any way but do you deny that she was?

[boutons_deux]

so, outside of the Christian marketing dept and copywriters who wrote the Bible, assembled it from various sources (rejecting a lot of other sources), there's no non-Christian evidence.

btw, Christ's contemporaries didn't consider Him to be divine, God. He was just a very special, holy, spiritually advanced Jewish rabbi.

Christ as God was made up 40 years after His death to convince, sucker the primitives into becoming followers.

[BacktoBasics]

btw, Christ's contemporaries didn't consider Him to be divine, God. He was just a very special, holy, spiritually advanced Jewish rabbi.

He was more like an apocalypticist. If he even existed at all. It was always about end times from the get go. I'd liken him to a very early times Harold Camping of sorts.

Then modern day Christianity morphed the doom and gloom perspective into a more financially digestible message. Where you'll not just be salvaged in the after life but rewarded in you current one as long as you "do good"..."pray"..."believe"..."tithe"...etc.

[Blake]

I think he is saying that because they didn't have movies to watch in biblical times. They might have though. I wasn't there.

K, I still don't see how that's relevant. Acting has been around for a long time, on screen or not.

[Blake]

Right, I agree. At what point in history though has everyone obeyed the law? My point was that the story was made even bigger than it should have been. Nothing wrong with protesting for her to go to jail and to be impeached but everything else was unnecessary.

Are you saying that she wasn't attacked? I'm not saying she is right in any way but do you deny that she was?

When you say "everything else" what exactly are you referring to? You obviously have some specific incident(s) in mind

[SpursforSix]

K, I still don't see how that's relevant. Acting has been around for a long time, on screen or not.

LOL. This shtick seems vaguely familiar....

[Blake]

LOL. This shtick seems vaguely familiar....

I'm not doing a shtick, cantthinkofanything

[I. Hustle]

K, I still don't see how that's relevant. Acting has been around for a long time, on screen or not.

Oh my bad. I didn't know that people could see the same exact plays all around the world at the same time back then. I thought it would take years to travel from one place to another and then it would change as it went. Weird, what do I know?

[I. Hustle]

When you say "everything else" what exactly are you referring to? You obviously have some specific incident(s) in mind

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/kim-davis-now-getting-death-threats-from-gay-bullies

http://shoebat.com/2015/09/10/homosexual-activists-tell-kim-davis-we-will-kidnap-your-husband-tie-him-up-and-force-him-to-watch-us-raping-you-we-will-burn-you-alive-civil-unrest-is-coming-to-america/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/01/kentucky-clerk-gets-horrific-and-violent-threats-as-she-doubles-down-in-gay-marriage-refusal-it-is-a-heaven-or-hell-decision/

That kind of everything else. It's ridiculous and makes both sides look like morons.

Oh you don't agree with me?! Well you are a narrow minded (insert liberal, bible thumper, sinner, bigot, etc.)!

It's the same stupid argument for both sides. Why not just let people be who they want to be? That goes for both groups.

[Blake]

Oh my bad. I didn't know that people could see the same exact plays all around the world at the same time back then. I thought it would take years to travel from one place to another and then it would change as it went. Weird, what do I know?

k, that still doesn't explain the importance of seeing the movie before writing new books. Do you really think the authors of the later books of the Bible had no idea of previous books/stories?

[boutons_deux]

"Why not just let people be who they want to be?"

Christian Taliban are forcing non-Christians to submit to their religious bullsht, iow, NOT letting people be who they want to be.

[I. Hustle]

"Why not just let people be who they want to be?"

Christian Taliban are forcing non-Christians to submit to their religious bullsht, iow, NOT letting people be who they want to be.




Follow along home boy. I am against that as well.

Plus, I don't see a lot of people submitting to anything. Religious or not.

Can't the same be said for all the "if you don't love two men in love then you must be a hateful bigot!" I see just as much propaganda for both sides and I don't see anyone saying "You know what? Those guys are right. Let me submit to their ideas"

Not agreeing with someone's beliefs is not the same as slandering, mocking and being a condescending a hole. You can disagree with someone without being a d bag. Again, that goes for both sides.

[Ignignokt]

Just shortage of a defendant.

Religion and it's followers are still, thousands of years and all the power later, trying to tidy up their doctrine. They don't have time for existential arguments. Any time you see an argument about the existence of god, at least three things happen:

1. It's argued that you cannot disprove god's existence
2. Religion's merits are argued
3. Atheism is labeled a religion in a "tu quoque" style argument.

Then it digresses to faith and you'll be prayed for, which is a welcomed change since religion has preyed ON us for most of history.

tips fedora


nah, brah i have to agree with you here.

[Blake]

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/kim-davis-now-getting-death-threats-from-gay-bullies

http://shoebat.com/2015/09/10/homosexual-activists-tell-kim-davis-we-will-kidnap-your-husband-tie-him-up-and-force-him-to-watch-us-raping-you-we-will-burn-you-alive-civil-unrest-is-coming-to-america/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/01/kentucky-clerk-gets-horrific-and-violent-threats-as-she-doubles-down-in-gay-marriage-refusal-it-is-a-heaven-or-hell-decision/

That kind of everything else. It's ridiculous and makes both sides look like morons.

Oh you don't agree with me?! Well you are a narrow minded (insert liberal, bible thumper, sinner, bigot, etc.)!

It's the same stupid argument for both sides. Why not just let people be who they want to be? That goes for both groups.

The "gay side" isn't condoning illegal death threats. If some idiots are caught saying they'll rape and kill her, they should be charged.

And saying the "argument is the same for both sides" is stupidly false. Gays have a legal right to get married. If she is denying them that right, then she's breaking the law. It's not even an argument. That's why she went to jail.

[I. Hustle]

k, that still doesn't explain the importance of seeing the movie before writing new books. Do you really think the authors of the later books of the Bible had no idea of previous books/stories?

It wasn't as easy to come by. I'm not saying that they couldn't have known some of the stories but books then weren't like books now. That's just fact. It's not like they could have gone to Ye Olde Barnes & Noble and picked up a copy of Matthew.

[I. Hustle]

The "gay side" isn't condoning illegal death threats. If some idiots are caught saying they'll rape and kill her, they should be charged.

And saying the "argument is the same for both sides" is stupidly false. Gays have a legal right to get married. If she is denying them that right, then she's breaking the law. It's not even an argument. That's why she went to jail.

So it's ok to lump all religious people together but not all gay people? You do know that they aren't exlusive right? There are plenty of religious gay people as well.

I'm all for throwing that crazy bitch in jail. Never said I was against it. I never once said she should not have gone to jail. I actually think I said the opposite along with impeachment.

[Blake]

Follow along home boy. I am against that as well.

Plus, I don't see a lot of people submitting to anything. Religious or not.

Can't the same be said for all the "if you don't love two men in love then you must be a hateful bigot!" I see just as much propaganda for both sides and I don't see anyone saying "You know what? Those guys are right. Let me submit to their ideas"

Not agreeing with someone's beliefs is not the same as slandering, mocking and being a condescending a hole. You can disagree with someone without being a d bag. Again, that goes for both sides.

Nice strawman you built there, homey

[Blake]

So it's ok to lump all religious people together but not all gay people? You do know that they aren't exlusive right? There are plenty of religious gay people as well.

I'm all for throwing that crazy bitch in jail. Never said I was against it. I never once said she should not have gone to jail. I actually think I said the opposite along with impeachment.

Who's lumping all religious people together here? it's not even about lumping gays together. It's about the law.

You're all over the place. I don't even know what argument you're trying to make

[SpursforSix]

I'm not doing a shtick, cantthinkofanything

Then you're fucking retarded.

[Ignignokt]

Who's lumping all religious people together here? it's not even about lumping gays together. It's about the law.

You're all over the place. I don't even know what argument you're trying to make

Yet, you cuck for Islam.

[Blake]

Then you're fucking retarded.

Neh, you're just upset because I called you out and you couldn't back it up

[Blake]

Yet, you cuck for Islam.

Neh, but I'm sure someone here will believe you

[Ignignokt]

Neh, you're just upset because I called you out and you couldn't back it up

Your wife backs it up into Jamaal err day

[Ignignokt]

Neh, you're just upset because I called you out and you couldn't back it up

You never called me out. Repeating an argument is not winning one.

[Blake]

You never called me out. Repeating an argument is not winning one.

Right i never called you out

[Avante]

Notice how all this Blake fuck does is go around bugging everyone, what a worthless slab of shit this prick is.

[Avante]

As far as Jesus goes, I doubt it was like that. We are seeing the origins of the fantasy novels there. Just stories written by numerous authors, the why is the mystery.

But, there is little doubt "something" is responsible for all this that we can't explain.

[SpursforSix]

Neh, you're just upset because I called you out and you couldn't back it up

When did you ever call me out?

[bigzak25]

Hey b2b, how did your business work out?

[Blake]

When did you ever call me out?

You said it was a terrible analogy. I said it was solid.

You uttered something about seeing the movie first is what makes the analogy bad. Paraphrasing, I said: "lolwut? Bullshit."

that should pretty much get you up to speed, but if you've already dropped it, i wouldn't blame you. It was pretty lame from the get go.

[SpursforSix]

You said it was a terrible analogy. I said it was solid.

You uttered something about seeing the movie first is what makes the analogy bad. Paraphrasing, I said: "lolwut? Bullshit."

that should pretty much get you up to speed, but if you've already dropped it, i wouldn't blame you. It was pretty lame from the get go.

Lol. It was a terrible analogy. I really thought you were trolling when you defended it. Surely you can see the differences.

[Blake]

Lol. It was a terrible analogy. I really thought you were trolling when you defended it. Surely you can see the differences.

Lol no it's a solid analogy. Parker2112's post was terrible.

[SpursforSix]

Lol no it's a solid analogy. Parker2112's post was terrible.

I don't know. Am I supposed to know who the fuck that is? What did he say? I can't imagine it has any bearing on whether the other dude's analogy made sense or not. And you seriously think all of those Star Wars books would have continuity if they didn't have the movies? You think each individual author would have read all the preceding books?

[Blake]

I don't know. Am I supposed to know who the fuck that is? What did he say? I can't imagine it has any bearing on whether the other dude's analogy made sense or not.

It's really a chore for you to keep up, huh



And you seriously think all of those Star Wars books would have continuity if they didn't have the movies?

I don't see why you're making it out as impossible. You seriously think movies are necessary for books to have continuity?



You think each individual author would have read all the preceding books?

It helps to avoid contradiction but it's not necessary if the author has a firm grasp of the star wars universe.

do you really believe the Bible has that much continuity? Serious question.

[Blake]

It wasn't as easy to come by. I'm not saying that they couldn't have known some of the stories but books then weren't like books now. That's just fact. It's not like they could have gone to Ye Olde Barnes & Noble and picked up a copy of Matthew.

Most scholars agree that Matthew and Luke relied on Mark.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/story/gospels.html

"synoptic gospels"

[I. Hustle]

Nice strawman you built there, homey

Strawman or truth? It's easy to put someone down that doesn't agree with you. It's harder to just accept that someone is different. Fanatics tell you that you are going to hell because you disagree with their theology and extreme atheists will get red in the face and mock your beliefs just because they don't agree.

I am friends with both religious people and with "non-believers" who are intelligent enough to know that not everyone is going to think the same way. It's only small minded idiots that foam at the mouth every time someone disagrees with them.

I'm not angry with you, Blake. You probably don't know any better. You were taught to hate and have obviously been through some tough experiences that have caused you to view things in a negative perspective. My only hope is that one day you will find peace. Whether it be in a higher power or in self acceptance. I'm done with the conversation in this thread.

Have a good day.

[Blake]

Strawman or truth? It's easy to put someone down that doesn't agree with you.

A strawman can be a truth. It's hard to discuss issues with people that use strawmen tho because they get in the way.



It's harder to just accept that someone is different. Fanatics tell you that you are going to hell because you disagree with their theology and extreme atheists will get red in the face and mock your beliefs just because they don't agree.

I am friends with both religious people and with "non-believers" who are intelligent enough to know that not everyone is going to think the same way. It's only small minded idiots that foam at the mouth every time someone disagrees with them.

I'm not angry with you, Blake. You probably don't know any better. You were taught to hate and have obviously been through some tough experiences that have caused you to view things in a negative perspective. My only hope is that one day you will find peace. Whether it be in a higher power or in self acceptance. I'm done with the conversation in this thread.

Have a good day.

I'm indifferent towards religious people that keep to themselves tbh.

County clerk Kim Davis isn't keeping her religion to herself. She's using it to justify her bigotry and her illegal conduct of denying marriage licenses.

I think you're a smart enough guy to figure out the difference if you really want to. But you won't.

[SpursforSix]

It's really a chore for you to keep up, huh



I don't see why you're making it out as impossible. You seriously think movies are necessary for books to have continuity?



It helps to avoid contradiction but it's not necessary if the author has a firm grasp of the star wars universe.

do you really believe the Bible has that much continuity? Serious question.
I really have no idea. I've never spent any serious time reading or studying the Bible.

[Blake]

I really have no idea. I've never spent any serious time reading or studying the Bible.

Well there you go.

[SpursforSix]

Well there you go.

That has nothing to do with being able to comprehend the correct use of words and making logical statements.

[Blake]

That has nothing to do with being able to comprehend the correct use of words and making logical statements.

Well if you don't know how the books of the Bible do or don't collaborate, then you're in a poor position to say the star wars book analogy is terrible.

[SpursforSix]

Well if you don't know how the books of the Bible do or don't collaborate, then you're in a poor position to say the star wars book analogy is terrible.

That's not even the argument is it?

What was the other part of the nickname Ingabe you? It was "hairlip something". Was it "hairlip club foot?"

[Blake]

That's not even the argument is it?

What was the other part of the nickname Ingabe you? It was "hairlip something". Was it "hairlip club foot?"

thx for confirming it's too difficult for you to keep up. Just lemme know when you think you have if you want

[SpursforSix]

thx for confirming it's too difficult for you to keep up. Just lemme know when you think you have if you want

Whatever. You really should spend less time focusing on things that obviously make you angry.

[Blake]

Says dude that spent time making a weird frustration thread about me regarding hairlips. Whatever hairlips are.

[SpursforSix]

Says dude that spent time making a weird frustration thread about me regarding hairlips. Whatever hairlips are.

Lol...frustration thread. Whereas you've spent a fair part of your life taking shots at the Bible and Christians.

[Avante]

Poor little Blake the dumb fuck constantly being slammed, hahaha!!!!!!!!

[Blake]

Lol...frustration thread. Whereas you've spent a fair part of your life taking shots at the Bible and Christians.

Lol fair part of life.

The Kim Davises of the world set themselves up for me to smhlol.

[Blake]

Poor little Blake the dumb fuck constantly being slammed, hahaha!!!!!!!!

Sup stalker

[SpursforSix]

Lol fair part of life.

The Kim Davises of the world set themselves up for me to smhlol.

It just seems that you spend a lot of time worrying if others agree with you. And then you get mad when they don't. And then you end up getting frustrated with your limited use of English and your lack of logic. That's all I was saying.

[Blake]

It just seems that you spend a lot of time worrying if others agree with you. And then you get mad when they don't. And then you end up getting frustrated with your limited use of English and your lack of logic. That's all I was saying.

It seems you've spent a lot of time thinking up my psychological and educational profile. Because that shows how non-frustrated you are.

[Quetzal-X]

I really have no idea. I've never spent any serious time reading or studying the Bible.


IMO the vast majority of christians have not spent any serious time reading or studying the bible. And the church just fucking loves it like that. If every christian could comprehend what they are "reading" , they would not need a priest, pastor, preacher, missionary to "interpret" that shit FOR you. Regular redneck and bumpkin mexicans mostly cannot comprehend what they read as all that really Matters is what is "comforting"

[LittleCriminal]

Bump