Ray Lewis: Colin Kaepernick's girlfriend cost him a job in Baltimore

[Aztecfan03]

One doesn't project power with putting up with shit. CK should've kept his woman in check. Dude's a fucking train wreck.
Aw cmon. You should have said "learn how to read."

[Axl Rose]

Is Pavlov still pretending he's not chumpdumper?

[Spurtacular]

Aw cmon. You should have said "learn how to read."

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Is Pavlov still pretending he's not chumpdumper?

Yes.

[Chris]

Is Pavlov still pretending he's not chumpdumper?

That MPD thingy...prayers for Pav :tu

[Pavlov]

One doesn't project power with putting up with shit.Dude needs to project power this way?

He's a billionaire. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Is Pavlov still pretending he's not chumpdumper?Well this is a stupid act from you.

[Spurtacular]

Dude needs to project power this way?

He's a billionaire. :lmao

And he didn't get to be one by being a cuck. I know it's hard for a sperm shield like you to understand. CK should've kept his bitch in check. You bite the hand that feeds and you get what you get.

[Axl Rose]

Well this is a stupid act from you.
Don't deflect, you have a serious addiction and psychological condition that keeps you coming back here for 15 years and hundreds of thousands of posts. You're old enough to be my dad, what the hell man? The whole reason you stopped the other account and picked up again on this one is because people were giving you a hard time about being this dedicated

[Spurtacular]

Don't deflect, you have a serious addiction and psychological condition that keeps you coming back here for 15 years and hundreds of thousands of posts. You're old enough to be my dad, what the hell man? The whole reason you stopped the other account and picked up again on this one is because people were giving you a hard time about being this dedicated

It is a sickness; he should do something with his life. He doesn't even do anything here besides sperm shield, anyways.

[Pavlov]

And he didn't get to be one by being a cuck. I know it's hard for a sperm shield like you to understand.I understand he's a snowflake.


Don't deflect, you have a serious addiction and psychological condition that keeps you coming back here for 15 years and hundreds of thousands of posts. You're old enough to be my dad, what the hell man? The whole reason you stopped the other account and picked up again on this one is because people were giving you a hard time about being this dedicatedActually it was the Russia stuff. Going back to the other when it's all over. Why are you using so many screen names yourself?

[Axl Rose]

I understand he's a snowflake.

Actually it was the Russia stuff. Going back to the other when it's all over. Why are you using so many screen names yourself?
I'm not sure I understand why the fake news Russian meme requires a new user name?

[Pavlov]

I'm not sure I understand why the fake news Russian meme requires a new user name?I'm sure there's a lot this screen name doesn't understand.

[Spurtacular]

I understand he's a snowflake.


Maybe you should lay off the snow in your own right, dude. You got shit completely backwards. Taking on CK would've been the pussiest thing he could've done.

[Pavlov]

Maybe you should lay off the snow in your own right, dude. You got shit completely backwards. Taking on CK would've been the pussiest thing he could've done.Nah, it would show he didn't give a shit about some stupid tweet. As it is he's shown he's a snowflake and easily hurt.

[Axl Rose]

So you needed a Russian troll to post fake news about a nonexistent Russian collusion? You could have just stopped posting entirely and gotten treatment for your addiction.

[Spurtacular]

Nah, it would show he didn't give a shit about some stupid tweet. As it is he's shown he's a snowflake and easily hurt.

It'd have shown that he takes shit like a bitch. That may be your role in life, bro; but it's not for winners.

[Pavlov]

So you needed a Russian troll to post fake news about a nonexistent Russian collusion? You could have just stopped posting entirely and gotten treatment for your addiction.Your tell is fairly obvious. You're the only individual who does it.

[Pavlov]

It'd have shown that he takes shit like a bitch. That may be your role in life, bro; but it's not for winners.:lol winners show they are ultra sensitive to girl tweets.

[Spurtacular]

:lol winners show they are ultra sensitive to girl tweets.

What's your logic on bashing the twitter medium? Do you think it'd somehow be different if the sentiment was relayed in another manner?

[Pavlov]

What's your logic on bashing the twitter medium?I'm not bashing the medium, genius.
Do you think it'd somehow be different if the sentiment was relayed in another manner?I'm saying how it was relayed, genius.

[Spurtacular]

I'm not bashing the medium, genius.I'm saying how it was relayed, genius.

How it's relayed (twitter) is the medium, "genius."

[Pavlov]

How it's relayed (twitter) is the medium, "genius."

Yes. That's why I said.

[Spurtacular]

Yes. That's why I said.

Poor grammar as a distraction? But at any rate, the twitter medium is of no relevance that you've presented despite your shitty arguments.

In your real life, you may take a good bitch slap in stride. But only a total idiot has his people insult prospective employers.

[Pavlov]

Poor grammar as a distraction? But at any rate, the twitter medium is of no relevance that you've presented despite your shitty arguments. I don't know why you're shitting yourself about this. I'm laughing about twitter. I'm laughing about snowflakes like you.


In your real life, you may take a good bitch slap in stride. But only a total idiot has his people insult prospective employers."Has his people."

:lmao

Snowflake.

[Chucho]

So you needed a Russian troll to post fake news about a nonexistent Russian collusion? You could have just stopped posting entirely and gotten treatment for your addiction.

Hypothetically, he does have time for that.

[pgardn]

So you needed a Russian troll to post fake news about a nonexistent Russian collusion? You could have just stopped posting entirely and gotten treatment for your addiction.

Oh.

So Pavlov is a Republican, 4chan, neckbeard.
Got it.

[Spurtacular]

I don't know why you're shitting yourself about this. I'm laughing about twitter. I'm laughing about snowflakes like you.

"Has his people."

:lmao

Snowflake.

I have to say his people b/c you cry like a bitch if I just say solely CK.

So, to be clear, you'd hire someone who plays you like a bitch?

[Pavlov]

I have to say his people b/c you cry like a bitch if I just say solely CK.Well you thought he sent the tweet.


So, to be clear, you'd hire someone who plays you like a bitch?CK didn't do anything. Damn, you still don't get it, snowflake.

[Axl Rose]

Oh.

So Pavlov is a Republican, 4chan, neckbeard.
Got it.
Stop horsing around

[Spurtacular]

Well you thought he sent the tweet.

CK didn't do anything. Damn, you still don't get it, snowflake.

Never thought that at all. Read it from the start that it was his woman sending the tweet. Even went to google images and wiki to see more on her at the time. But you'll believe what you want to believe, so no point in arguing it.

....

Told you if I didn't say it you cry like a bitch.... So, to be clear, you'd hire someone who has his people play you like a bitch?

[Pavlov]

Never thought that at all. Read it from the start that it was his woman sending the tweet. Even went to google images and wiki to see more on her at the time. But you'll believe what you want to believe, so no point in arguing it.Then quit saying he sent the tweet. Get it straight for once.


Told you if I didn't say it you cry like a bitch if I didn't say sh** to a tee..... So, to be clear, you'd hire someone who has his people play you like a bitch?That's not being played like a bitch. Only a snowflake would think that.

[Spurtacular]

Then quit saying he sent the tweet. Get it straight for once.

That's not being played like a bitch. Only a snowflake would think that.

:lmao

Dude, his woman shat all over the owner and Ray. I would've kicked his ass to the curb too. Real G's don't roll like bitches, bro.

[Pavlov]

:lmao

Dude, his woman shat all over the owner and Ray. I would've kicked his ass to the curb too. Real G's don't roll like bitches, bro.:lol real Mormon Gs

Snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

:lol real Mormon Gs

Snowflake.

Cucklov would take a bitch's shit!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1PaxOaKPezI/hqdefault.jpg

[Pavlov]

Cucklov would take a bitch's shit!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1PaxOaKPezI/hqdefault.jpg:lol You would let a tweet get to you and whine to the world about it, snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

You would let a tweet get to you and whine to the world about it.

I love how CK's bitch does sh** with impunity; but the other side is "whining" and "snowflakes." Bro, you don't take reality for what it is. Or maybe you do and just argue stupid sh** anyways.

[Pavlov]

I love how CK's bitch does sh** with impunity; but the other side is "whining" and "snowflakes." Bro, you don't take reality for what it is. Or maybe you do and just argue stupid sh** anyways.She's the one who sent the stupid tweet. They're the ones who were snowflakes about it and whined about it to the press. That's the reality. You can't change it.

[Spurtacular]

She's the one who sent the stupid tweet. They're the ones who were snowflakes about it and whined about it to the press. That's the reality. You can't change it.

They put it out there that CK is a bitch. So, that the next time gimps whine that CK ain't in the league they'll know why. Snowflakes like you can't handle that.

[Pavlov]

They put it out there that CK is a bitch. So, that the next time gimps whine that CK ain't in the league they'll know why. Snowflakes like you can't handle that.Because of a tweet?

:rollin

What a bunch of snowflakes. "Put it out there" because of a tweet! :lmao

[Spurtacular]

Because of a tweet?

:rollin

What a bunch of snowflakes. "Put it out there" because of a tweet! :lmao

When and if you get a job, someday, go talk shit about your employer on a personal verified twitter account and see where it gets you.

[Pavlov]

When and if you get a job, someday, go talk shit about your employer on a personal verified twitter account and see where it gets you.:lmao the employee didn't do anything snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao the employee didn't do anything snowflake.

There is no employee, dumb fuck.

If your point is that I didn't use an exact example it's a dumb fucking point like pretty much every pedantic point you make.

[Pavlov]

There is no employee, dumb fuck.

If your point is that I didn't use an exact example it's a dumb fucking point like pretty much every pedantic point you make.You keep missing the point. That's the point. It's really funny.

[Spurtacular]

She's the one who sent the stupid tweet. They're the ones who were snowflakes about it and whined about it to the press. That's the reality. You can't change it.

When you get a job, talk shit to your boss and see where it gets you.

[Pavlov]

When you get a job, talk shit to your boss and see where it gets you.It wasn't the employee talking shit.

[Spurtacular]

It wasn't the employee talking shit.

Nor was he going to be after that. :lol

[Pavlov]

Nor was he going to be after that. :lolAfter what? Your hypothetical's all wrong.

[Spurtacular]

After what? Your hypothetical's all wrong.

More gimpy rebuttals, huh.

[Pavlov]

More gimpy rebuttals, huh.You just keep fucking up over and over. You keep trying to change the facts because it's an incredibly stupid thing to be a snowflake about and you know it. It's a riot.

[Spurtacular]

You just keep fucking up over and over. You keep trying to change the facts because it's an incredibly stupid thing to be a snowflake about and you know it. It's a riot.

The facts are pretty straight forward; always have been. You just love dramatizing them like a true drama queen.

[Pavlov]

The facts are pretty straight forward; always have been. You just love dramatizing them like a true drama queen.You're the one trying to change them. The snowflake owner and snowflake convicted perjurer made all the drama with their reaction.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one trying to change them. The snowflake owner and snowflake convicted perjurer made all the drama with their reaction.

Never tried to change them, bro. Made an innocuous statement that omitted a detail and you got your ire up and acted like it was shit because you were losing the argument.

[Pavlov]

Never tried to change them, bro. Made an innocuous statement that omitted a detail and you got your ire up and acted like it was shit because you were losing the argument.Never tried to change them. I just changed them several times.

[Spurtacular]

Never tried to change them. I just changed them several times.


Didn't feel like saying shit like "prospective" and "his people" and whatever other terms every fucking time. A dick weed like you pretends that's "changing" shit.

[Pavlov]

Didn't feel like saying shit like "prospective" and "his people" and whatever other terms every fucking time. A dick weed like you pretends that's "changing" shit.No pretending. You changed it multiple times because the actual case is so middle school you feel stupid repeating it.

[Spurtacular]

No pretending. You changed it multiple times because the actual case is so middle school you feel stupid repeating it.

You love to argue in the weeds, bro.

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov: 'It's not fair that CK doesn't get a job after his chick shit talks the prospective employer! They're just snowflakes!'

:lmao

/Thread

[Pavlov]

Pavlov: 'It's not fair that CK doesn't get a job after his chick shit talks the prospective employer! They're just snowflakes!'

:lmao

/ThreadIn never said anything about fairness. I said Baltimore Snowflakes.

/thread

[Spurtacular]

In never said anything about fairness. I said Baltimore Snowflakes.

/thread

:lmao You whined enough; one would figure it was implied.

But okay, let's try this again:

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Pavlov]

:lmao You whined enough; one would figure it was implied.One figured wrong.


But okay, let's try this again:

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/threadNope.

Baltimore Snowflakes.

Just like you.

/thread

[Spurtacular]

One figured wrong.

Nope.

Baltimore Snowflakes.

Just like you.

/thread

So, you're saying you whine for days over things you don't even consider unfair? :lmao

.....

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Pavlov]

So, you're saying you whine for days over things you don't even consider unfair? :lmaoDidn't have to.


.....

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/threadNope.

Baltimore Snowflakes.

Just like you.

/thread

[Spurtacular]

Didn't have to.

But you did (whine like a bitch for days). :lmao

...

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Pavlov]

But you did (whine like a bitch for days). :lmaoYou were a snowflake for days. Still are. :lmao

/thread

[Spurtacular]

You were a snowflake for days. Still are. :lmao

/thread

You spent days not avoiding clarifying what you meant by "Baltimore snowflakes" cos you knew you were cucking hard! :lmao

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Pavlov]

You spent days not avoiding clarifying what you meant by "Baltimore snowflakes" cos you knew you were cucking hard! :lmao

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/threadI was stringing you along because you couldn't figure out something the was right in front of you, snowflake. :lol "abuse"

You're such a victim.

[Spurtacular]

I was stringing you along because you couldn't figure out something the was right in front of you, snowflake. :lol "abuse"

You're such a victim.

Way to conflate, brah. Never equated any "abuse" to myself, brah. Nice try, brah.

And it was all over when we got to the red meat.

'But but he has billions...'

'But but it's just a girl...'

'But but twitter's not real.....'

:lmao Real G's don't play, son.

[Pavlov]

Way to conflate, brah. Never equated any "abuse" to myself, brah. Nice try, brah.

And it was all over when we got to the red meat.

'But but he has billions...'

'But but it's just a girl...'

'But but twitter's not real.....'

:lmao Real G's don't play, son.:lol Real Mormon G twitter abuse

You're the real victim here.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Real Mormon G twitter abuse

You're the real victim here.

How many millions know CK (via his bitch) trashed the Ravens owner? Wazza, brah? Your twitter angle is full-on retard, son.

[Pavlov]

How many millions know CK (via his bitch) trashed the Ravens owner? Wazza, brah? Your twitter angle is full-on retard, son.It's your angle. Quit trying slang. You're still white.

[Spurtacular]

It's your angle. Quit trying slang. You're still white.

No it's not. I disregard the heightened (non)relevance of the medium that you attribute to it. It's your issue, bro.

[Pavlov]

No it's not. I disregard the heightened (non)relevance of the medium that you attribute to it. It's your issue, bro.:lmao you don't even know what you're saying at this point.

:lmao real Gs hurt by a girlfriend tweet

[spurraider21]

As long as people stop pretending he's only out of the league because he's not a good enough player to be even a backup, I rest my case. Whether it's his kneeling or gf tweets, either way

[Spurtacular]

As long as people stop pretending he's only out of the league because he's not a good enough player to be even a backup, I rest my case. Whether it's his kneeling or gf tweets, either way

He was already benched before he added his drama to it all. He's a suck-ass player who shouldn't be playin' games in the margins. So, your attempt at getting some sort of vindication is trite.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao you don't even know what you're saying at this point.

:lmao real Gs hurt by a girlfriend tweet

Whoa! More worthless blanket statements that don't mean shit! :lmao

Let me remind you:

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Pavlov]

Whoa! More worthless blanket statements that don't mean shit! :lmao

Let me remind you:

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread:lmao abuse

[Spurtacular]

:lmao abuse

Abuse - language that condemns or vilifies usually unjustly, intemperately, and angrily

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Chucho]

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

:rollin

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Pavlov]

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread:lol
:abuse victim

[Spurtacular]

:lol
:abuse victim

Never called him a victim, bro. Owner took a bitch out, tbh.

[Pavlov]

Never called him a victim, bro. Owner took a bitch out, tbh.

If he's not a victim of abuse, what's the problem?

[Spurtacular]

If he's not a victim of abuse, what's the problem?

Owner was a recipient of abuse. No problem. He took a bitch out at the knees.

[Pavlov]

Owner was a recipient of abuse. No problem. He took a bitch out at the knees.

So he was a victim of abuse. OK. And did nothing to his abuser.

[Spurtacular]

So he was a victim of abuse.

Oh, well I'm glad to see you're owning up to the fact that CK's gf is an abuser.

[Pavlov]

Oh, well I'm glad to see you're owning up to the fact that CK's gf is an abuser.:lmao Real G twitter abuse victim!

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Real G twitter abuse victim!

Do you think this is novel, a person paying a heavy price for immature actions via social media?

[Pavlov]

Do you think this is novel, a person paying a heavy price for immature actions via social media?Which person?

[Spurtacular]

Which person?

A person. Learn the language.

[Pavlov]

A person. Learn the language.But which person in this case?

[Spurtacular]

But which person in this case?

You know who paid the price in this case, bro.

[Pavlov]

You know who paid the price in this case, bro.CK?

He didn't do anything to anyone.

[DMC]

As long as people stop pretending he's only out of the league because he's not a good enough player to be even a backup, I rest my case. Whether it's his kneeling or gf tweets, either way

When you stop pretending there's only one variable in the equation of employment as a professional athlete that resolves to the package the individual has to offer.

[Spurtacular]

CK?

He didn't do anything to anyone.

We weren't immediately discussing who did whatever. Who paid the price, bro?

[DMC]

We weren't immediately discussing who did whatever. Who paid the price, bro?

You know his schtick already. He's going to use "so..." before some narrative he creates and then chase that for pages as if he just created a new reality by offering a strawman.

[Pavlov]

We weren't immediately discussing who did whatever. Who paid the price, bro?CK.

He didn't do anything to anyone.

[Spurtacular]

CK.

He didn't do anything to anyone.

Yes, but his girlfriend did. Or do you think that players should be allowed to have their immediate 'loved ones' be allowed to shit talk the organization with impunity?

[Spurtacular]

You know his schtick already. He's going to use "so..." before some narrative he creates and then chase that for pages as if he just created a new reality by offering a strawman.

Yea, I know. And it's fun because he thinks he sees five moves ahead; but I often squash him in one or two. :lol

[Pavlov]

Yes, but his girlfriend did. Or do you think that players should be allowed to have their immediate 'loved ones' be allowed to shit talk the organization with impunity?I don't know why billionaires would give a shit, honestly. Seems petty for a real G.

[Spurtacular]

I don't know why billionaires would give a shit, honestly. Seems petty for a real G.

Okay, we've established that. Now, do you think that players should be allowed to have their immediate 'loved ones' be allowed to shit talk the organization with impunity?

[Pavlov]

Okay, we've established that. Now, do you think that players should be allowed to have their immediate 'loved ones' be allowed to shit talk the organization with impunity?I just said I don't know why billionaires should give a shit, especially this one. If his BFF is and face of the franchise a guy who was convicted of lying about a killing and snitched on his friends, I don't see how a tweet could mean anything.

[Spurtacular]

I just said I don't know why billionaires should give a shit, especially this one. If his BFF is and face of the franchise a guy who was convicted of lying about a killing and snitched on his friends, I don't see how a tweet could mean anything.

IIRC, Ray was charged with obstruction, not perjury. There's a difference. I don't recall if he was even convicted (IIRC, he wasn't on the condition that he testified against his friend). But that aside, do you think that a player should be allowed to have his 'loved ones' attack the organization for which he plays or desires to play for in this case?

[Pavlov]

IIRC, Ray was charged with obstruction, not perjury. There's a difference.The obstruction was lying.
I don't recall if he was even convicted.Dude confessed, pleaded guilty and was sentenced in exchange for his snitching.
But that aside, do you think that a player should be allowed to have his 'loved ones' attack the organization for which he plays or desires to play for in this case?"attack"
"abuse"

Snowflake talk.

I think billionaires shouldn't give a shit about twitter. Sad!

[Spurtacular]

The obstruction was lying.Dude confessed, pleaded guilty and was sentenced in exchange for his snitching."attack"
"abuse"

Snowflake talk.

I think billionaires shouldn't give a shit about twitter. Sad!

So, at this point you're basically arguing that because Ray Lewis is a bad guy, then CK should be allowed to have his woman talk shit about the owner, and he should be rewarded with a contract despite that.

[Pavlov]

So, at this point you're basically arguing that because Ray Lewis is a bad guy, then CK should be allowed to have his woman talk shit about the owner, and he should be rewarded with a contract despite that.CK had nothing to do with it and billionaires shouldn't be snowflakes about twitter, period.

[DMC]

CK had nothing to do with it and billionaires shouldn't be snowflakes about twitter, period.

Unless your name is Donald Trump, right?

[Pavlov]

Unless your name is Donald Trump, right?Billionaires shouldn't be snowflakes about twitter, but they are.

[Spurtacular]

CK had nothing to do with it and billionaires shouldn't be snowflakes about twitter, period.

And how do you know that CK had nothing to do with it?

[DMC]

Billionaires shouldn't be snowflakes about twitter, but they are.

But the left can be snowflakes about it if it's a billionaire tweeting.

So financial status dictates whether or not you should be a "snowflake" about twitter.

[Pavlov]

And how do you know that CK had nothing to do with it?There is no evidence he did.

[DMC]

CK had nothing to do with it and billionaires shouldn't be snowflakes about twitter, period.

It's his girlfriend who did it so yeah, in the eyes of the franchise, it was enough to tip the scales against him (obviously he was teetering already, probably some kind of marketing plan caused them to consider him in the first place).

[Pavlov]

But the left can be snowflakes about it if it's a billionaire tweeting.Not necessarily.


So financial status dictates whether or not you should be a "snowflake" about twitter.Not necessarily. We're just talking about billionaires here.

If you want to make a little list, you go right ahead.

[Spurtacular]

There is no evidence he did.

So, you think that players should be allowed to have their gfs or wives talk shit about the owner so long as he can't prove that the player was directly involved?

[Pavlov]

It's his girlfriend who did it so yeah, in the eyes of the franchise, it was enough to tip the scales against him (obviously he was teetering already, probably some kind of marketing plan caused them to consider him in the first place).He is free to be a snowflake about twitter, as is anyone.

[DMC]

Not necessarily.

Not necessarily. We're just talking about billionaires here.

If you want to make a little list, you go right ahead.

Billionaire is a financial status.

[DMC]

He is free to be a snowflake about twitter, as is anyone.

Call him and let him know he can proceed.

[Pavlov]

Billionaire is a financial status.And we were only talking about one, not others.

If you want to make a little list of them, you go right ahead.

[Pavlov]

Call him and let him know he can proceed.No one needs approval to be a snowflake. They are free to be snowflakes.

[DMC]

He is free to be a snowflake about twitter, as is anyone.


No one needs approval to be a snowflake. They are free to be snowflakes.

:lmao

You're really trying to shift the term "snowflake" to someone other than the SJWs.

[Pavlov]

:lmaoIt is funny you need these things explained to you.

[DMC]

It is funny you need these things explained to you.

Says the person who needs "We the People" explained.

:lol

[Pavlov]

Says the person who needs "We the People" explained.

:lolYou could never do it though.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

You're really trying to shift the term "snowflake" to someone other than the SJWs.

Astute observation.

[Spurtacular]

So, you think that players should be allowed to have their gfs or wives talk shit about the owner so long as he can't prove that the player was directly involved?
Pavlov

[Pavlov]

:lmao

You're really trying to shift the term "snowflake" to someone other than the SJWs.It fits in this case tbh.

[Pavlov]

PavlovI don't know how many times I have to tell you I don't think billionaires should be snowflakes.

Really, why should he care?

[Spurtacular]

I don't know how many times I have to tell you I don't think billionaires should be snowflakes.

Really, why should he care?

So, you think that players should be allowed to have their gfs or wives talk shit about the owner so long as he can't prove that the player was directly involved?

[Pavlov]

So, you think that players should be allowed to have their gfs or wives talk shit about the owner so long as he can't prove that the player was directly involved?That would still qualify as being a snowflake.

Really, why should he care?

[Spurtacular]

That would still qualify as being a snowflake.

Really, why should he care?

So, you're for bringing in pernicious persons into an organization?

[DeadlyDynasty]

He's definitely capable of b/u QB duty, but like others have said you basically have to tailor your offense to gimmickry, just like Tebow. I think a lot of people forget that Harbaugh and Roman created a "pistol" formation offense for him that hadn't been seen yet. After a year/year 1/2 of game film it/he was ineffective. We're talking about a guy who eventually lost his job to Blaine Gabbert--before this social charade ever started. I think the beef some people have with him was his timing. If he pulled this act when he was on top it would still be vilified, but the message would've resonated greater, imo. When he did it he was a scrub who was fast-losing playing time, endorsements, and the spotlight--so it came off as a desperation move to get back the attention he lost. He doesn't come off as genuine at all, either. This is the same guy who tried to date-rape a chick with molly in Miami, and also had a SC special on his collection of 500 pairs of Air Jordans:lol (a killer in the black community). So, questionable morals/priorities + precipitous NFL decline = recipe for disaster. Again, this was all before the Anthem protesting.

He absolutely deserves to be riding the pine on some NFL roster instead of black-balled (no arguments there), but who wants that distraction now, especially as it's crescendoing? He's not good enough for anything more than a few spot-starts, and the media would be clamoring for him to start on whatever roster he was on, making the QB situation a ticking timebomb, and ultimately cause distractions and divisiveness in the locker room. From a business perspective, who wants that risk? As an owner it would be a no-win situation since you'd be bringing in a limited player with lots of baggage...and let's be honest, the people that are genuinely behind Kaepernick can't afford to go to the games, so they do nothing to positively affect an owner's bottom line.

As for the teams with serious QB issues, some are due to injured starters and the others (most of, anyways) are content to suck this year because there'll be a LOADED QB draft class in 2018.

[Pavlov]

So, you're for bringing in pernicious persons into an organization?Pernicious? He's already done that, so that argument is moot.

[Spurtacular]

Pernicious? He's already done that, so that argument is moot.

Hmm. All-time great MLB vs. scrub QB. But let's change the question to suit your snowflake qualifications; you're for bringing in pernicious back-up quarterbacks into a locker room?

[Pavlov]

Hmm. All-time great MLB vs. scrub QB. But let's change the question to suit your snowflake qualifications; you're for bringing in pernicious back-up quarterbacks into a locker room?:lol You haven't proved he had anything to do with it but you keep trying to pretend he did.

:lol victim of pernicious girlfriend tweet abuse

[DeadlyDynasty]

Hmm. All-time great MLB vs. scrub QB. But let's change the question to suit your snowflake qualifications; you're for bringing in pernicious back-up quarterbacks into a locker room?
Odd choice of words, but whatever. I don't think I've ever heard anything about him being a bad teammate, so he wouldn't be directly "pernicious." He would however be indirectly pernicious due to the media circus/sjw's that come as a package deal

[Spurtacular]

:lol You haven't proved he had anything to do with it but you keep trying to pretend he did.

:lol victim of pernicious girlfriend tweet abuse

I don't need to prove that CK had anything to prove to do with the tweet. It's CK's responsibility to keep his bitch in check.

Again, you attack the medium (twitter) as if it has anything to do with anything. It's a cyber megaphone. Deal with reality, bro.

[Spurtacular]

Odd choice of words, but whatever. I don't think I've ever heard anything about him being a bad teammate, so he wouldn't be directly "pernicious." He would however be indirectly pernicious due to the media circus/sjw's that come as a package deal

I wasn't even talking about him being a bad teammate; but apparently there's an argument for that as well.


We're told one of the issues that was raised in the meeting was ... a bunch of players felt like Colin had been acting like a "loner" -- constantly walking around the team facility with his headphones on, tuning out the rest of the team.
Our sources tell us players are frustrated because it makes Colin seem unapproachable -- and some of the vets, including Davis, felt he NEEDS to be more inclusive if he wants to be an effective leader.
We're told it's not just the headphones ... it's more complicated ... but it was raised in the meeting as one of the issues.

http://www.tmz.com/2015/10/29/colin-kaepernick-headphones-pissing-off-teammates/




The 2-5 49ers, whose fall from grace is reflected in the plunge of their one-time wunderkind quarterback, have a leader whose confidence is completely lost, according to a report from Fox Sports (http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/san-francisco-49ers-colin-kaepernick-on-an-island-in-locker-room-jay-glazer-102515), and his teammates aren’t exactly picking him up.
After a particularly brutal defeat to the Seahawks on Thursday, in which Kaepernick passed for just 124 yards and was sacked six times, the 27-year-old lost the game and showed signs of losing his locker room.
“His confidence is completely shot,” insider Jay Glazer said Sunday on a FOX pregame show. “It’s not that [the players] don’t like him. But he’s just alone, on an island in that locker room. There’s not a lot of people he connects with.
“Confidence-wise, he’s just buried right now.”

http://nypost.com/2015/10/25/colin-kaepernick-and-the-49ers-have-a-locker-room-problem/

[Spurtacular]

No one needs approval to be a snowflake. They are free to be snowflakes.

Is this your rationale for being a snowflake? You feel free?

[Spurtacular]

There is no evidence he did.

There is strong circumstantial evidence to suggest that CK was involved in the tweet.

Following Michael Vick's assessment that CK should look the part, he tweeted a Stockholm Syndrome definition that is "identifying with captors." In that case, he was too afraid to directly speak on the subject.

See any parallels?

[Pavlov]

I don't need to prove that CK had anything to prove to do with the tweet. It's CK's responsibility to keep his bitch in check. :lol single guy, eh?


Again, you attack the medium (twitter) as if it has anything to do with anything. It's a cyber megaphone. Deal with reality, bro.:lol "attack" again with the snowflake terms. I'm emphasizing how trivial it all is.


Is this your rationale for being a snowflake? You feel free?You are free to be a snowflake and feel attacked all the time. Doesn't mean you should.


There is strong circumstantial evidence to suggest that CK was involved in the tweet.

Following Michael Vick's assessment that CK should look the part, he tweeted a Stockholm Syndrome definition that is "identifying with captors." In that case, he was too afraid to directly speak on the subject.

See any parallels?Were these tweets? :lmao They're all free to be snowflakes.

As are you. You are way too sensitive to millionaire girlfriend attack abuse tweets to millionaire and billionaire victims. It's middle school shit you never grew out of.

[Spurtacular]

:lol single guy, eh?

:lol "attack" again with the snowflake terms. I'm emphasizing how trivial it all is.

You are free to be a snowflake and feel attacked all the time. Doesn't mean you should.

Were these tweets? :lmao They're all free to be snowflakes.

As are you. You are way too sensitive to millionaire girlfriend attack abuse tweets to millionaire and billionaire victims. It's middle school shit you never grew out of.

His girlfriend shit talked his one prospective employer. :lmao That's just beyond stupid on its face. :lmao Anyone protesting that reality is the real SJW snowflake :lmao

You're the real snowflake, hence why you spent days even avoiding directly answering the question of who you were calling a snowflake! :lmao

Quadrupling down on your stupidity! :lmao

[Pavlov]

His girlfriend shit talked his one prospective employer. :lmao That's just beyond stupid on its face. :lmao Anyone protesting that reality is the real SJW snowflake :lmao

You're the real snowflake, hence why you spent days even avoiding directly answering the question of who you were calling a snowflake! :lmao

Quadrupling down on your stupidity! :lmao:lol you couldn't figure out what I plainly stated for days.

[Spurtacular]

:lol you couldn't figure out what I plainly stated for days.

Onus was on you to clarify. And once I skipped by your pussy refusal to clarify at post 177 and moved onto your chicken meat, you cracked like a little bitch really fast. You even tried to run out when I talked about the CK tweet without mentioning his bitch sent it on his behalf. :lmao It doesn't get more snowflake than that! :lmao

His girlfriend shit talked his one prospective employer. :lmao That's just beyond stupid on its face. :lmao Anyone protesting that reality is the real SJW snowflake :lmao

[boutons_deux]

Bengals players reportedly want team to consider bringing in Colin Kaepernick


https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/bengals-players-reportedly-want-team-to-consider-bringing-in-colin-kaepernick/

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his bitch)?'

:lmao

/thread

[Pavlov]

Onus was on you to clarify. And once I skipped by your pussy refusal to clarify at post 177 and moved onto your chicken meat, you cracked like a little bitch really fast. You even tried to run out when I talked about the CK tweet without mentioning his bitch sent it on his behalf. :lmao It doesn't get more snowflake than that! :lmao

His girlfriend shit talked his one prospective employer. :lmao That's just beyond stupid on its face. :lmao Anyone protesting that reality is the real SJW snowflake :lmao
Who's protesting? I'm just saying bilionaires and millionaires are hilariously sensitive about girlfriend attack tweet abuse.Your posting history is mostly one big ongoing meltdown over black people in sports. Also hilarious.

[spurraider21]

When you stop pretending there's only one variable in the equation of employment as a professional athlete that resolves to the package the individual has to offer.
I never pretended that there was just one variable. In fact that's been my main point. There are people who act like the only variable leading to kaepernicks unemployment was his level of play. My argument against those folk has been exactly that there are more variables in play.

In a vacuum, his play would warrant at least a backup spot. The second variable, his political shtick, pushed it over the line

[spurraider21]

:lol Jaguars sign Ryan nassib

[DMC]

I never pretended that there was just one variable. In fact that's been my main point. There are people who act like the only variable leading to kaepernicks unemployment was his level of play. My argument against those folk has been exactly that there are more variables in play.

In a vacuum, his play would warrant at least a backup spot. The second variable, his political shtick, pushed it over the line
Well technically it is his level of play because it doesn't rise above the baggage that it comes with. And one way or another it's always about level of play versus the negatives.

[spurraider21]

Well technically it is his level of play because it doesn't rise above the baggage that it comes with. And one way or another it's always about level of play versus the negatives.
Sure. And when people acted like his baggage was irrelevant and he was put of the league because he's washed up and sucks, they deserved to be corrected

[Spurtacular]

In a vacuum, his play would warrant at least a backup spot. The second variable, his political shtick, pushed it over the line

Supposing a team wants to take the steps to redesign its offense for the backup QB. Some probably would too. Most wouldn't. Then the some have to decide if he is that much better a backup and if the potential distractions / drops in profit would be worth it. CK dug his own hole, dude. And the sad part is he just kept digging instead of allowing sh** to blow over. He's a victim of his own pride.

[Spurtacular]

Who's protesting? I'm just saying bilionaires and millionaires are hilariously sensitive about girlfriend attack tweet abuse.Your posting history is mostly one big ongoing meltdown over black people in sports. Also hilarious.

You called out the owner for not accepting a prospective player's abuse. That's just utterly stupid on its face. I guess you just stand united with your fellow SJWs at the end of the day no matter how stupid it makes you look.

[spurraider21]

Supposing a team wants to take the steps to redesign its offense for the backup QB. Some probably would too. Most wouldn't. Then the some have to decide if he is that much better a backup and if the potential distractions / drops in profit would be worth it. CK dug his own hole, dude. And the sad part is he just kept digging instead of allowing sh** to blow over. He's a victim of his own pride.
The Colts had Scott fuckin Tolzien start but were perfectly happy starting the running brisset one week later.

The Raiders signed EJ Manuel as their backup

The Texans went from Savage to Watson.

This argument sounds great but fails in practice

[Pavlov]

You called out the owner for not accepting a prospective player's abuse. That's just utterly stupid on its face. I guess you just stand united with your fellow SJWs at the end of the day no matter how stupid it makes you look.:lol abuse

And again, CK did nothing. You can't help but lie about that.

[Spurtacular]

The Colts had Scott fuckin Tolzien start but were perfectly happy starting the running brisset one week later.

The Raiders signed EJ Manuel as their backup

The Texans went from Savage to Watson.

This argument sounds great but fails in practice

At any given time, you can find a handful of failure starting QBs. That's the nature of the beast. Pointing to one of them as a reason for CK getting screwed does not pass the muster. CK in his own right was a failure, which is why he was benched, dude. Ask yourself if you'd want to roll with a diva backup QB.

[Spurtacular]

:lol abuse

And again, CK did nothing. You can't help but lie about that.

CK is culpable for his gf talking shit about a prospective employer. You're pretending he did nothing wrong as a means to pretend you're not the real snowflake here. PATHETIC.

[Pavlov]

CK is culpable for his gf talking shit about a prospective employer. You're pretending he did nothing wrong as a means to pretend you're not the real snowflake here. PATHETIC.:lol culpable

You're taking this waaaaaaay too seriously, snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

:lol culpable

You're taking this waaaaaaay too seriously, snowflake.

You think they saw the tweets and thought they were innocuous and that CK had nothing to do with it? That would be supremely stupid; almost as supremely stupid as CK's bitch sending out the tweet.

[Pavlov]

You think they saw the tweets and thought they were innocuous and that CK had nothing to do with it? That would be supremely stupid; almost as supremely stupid as CK's bitch sending out the tweet.I think they saw the tweets and lost their shit like sensitive snowflakes do.

They let the world know that this woman got to them by posting two pictures together and letting them connect the dots.

[Spurtacular]

I think they saw the tweets and lost their shit like sensitive snowflakes do.

They let the world know that this woman got to them by posting two pictures together and letting them connect the dots.

CK is culpable, bro. Only SJWs like you would make excuses for that level of bad behavior.

[Pavlov]

CK is culpable, bro. Only SJWs like you would make excuses for that level of bad behavior.:lmao bad behavior in this case being nothing, snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao bad behavior in this case being nothing, snowflake.

So, you're saying that Colin Kaepernick is a victim?

[Pavlov]

So, you're saying that Colin Kaepernick is a victim?I'm saying he's been declared guilty by association. If you think that's fair, OK. He's certainly prone to overreactions from snowflakes.

[Spurtacular]

I'm saying he's been declared guilty by association. If you think that's fair, OK. He's certainly prone to overreactions from snowflakes.

:lmao Guilty by association.

So, Colin Kaepernick bares no responsibility for whatever his girlfriend says about prospective employers?

[Spurtacular]

:lol Jaguars sign Ryan nassib

Age 25 and ninety percent career completion percentage. But you're not alone in your disgraceful dismissal. One snowflake media reporter called it "yet another mediocre quarterback signed instead of Colin Kaepernick."

[Pavlov]

:lmao Guilty by association.

So, Colin Kaepernick bares no responsibility for whatever his girlfriend says about prospective employers?If you believe he is guilty by association.

[Spurtacular]

If you believe he is guilty by association.

Guilty by association implies happenstance. I think there is no happenstance to his bitch talking shit about (prospective) employers.

[Pavlov]

Guilty by association implies happenstance. I think there is no happenstance to his bitch talking shit about (prospective) employers.Great. Prove it.

[Spurtacular]

Great. Prove it.

I don't have to prove it. Nor does the owner. Colin Kaepernick is the only one to blame for not meeting reasonable expectations. Only SJWs argue against these time-tested standards.

[Pavlov]

I don't have to prove it. Nor does the owner. Colin Kaepernick is the only one to blame for not meeting reasonable expectations. Only SJWs argue against these time-tested standards.So all you have is guilt by association.

:lol time-tested tweet abuse standards

Snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

So all you have is guilt by association.

:lol time-tested tweet abuse standards

Snowflake.

No guilt by association as established. CK is responsible for the notorious statements of his girlfriend with regards to prospective employment. If he cannot keep her in check, he should find a new girlfriend. BTW, she has issued no apology either. Nor has CK disavowed the tweet.

[Pavlov]

No guilt by association as established. CK is responsible for the notorious statements of his girlfriend with regards to prospective employment. If he cannot keep her in check, he should find a new girlfriend. BTW, she has issued no apology either. Nor has CK disavowed the tweet.Guilt by association. Nothing else.

Snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

Guilt by association. Nothing else.

Snowflake.

Why didn't CK take the corrective steps following the tweet if he's an innocent?

[Pavlov]

Why didn't CK take the corrective steps following the tweet if he's an innocent?:lol corrective steps

It's someone else's tweet. Who gives a shit besides snowflakes?

[Spurtacular]

:lol corrective steps

It's someone else's tweet. Who gives a shit besides snowflakes?

It's not just someone. It's his common law wife. He took no care to disavow the himself of the sentiment. He's culpable, bro.

[Pavlov]

It's not just someone. It's his common law wife. He took no care to disavow the himself of the sentiment. He's culpable, bro.:lol culpable

Guilt by association. That's all you got. Nothing else.

Snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

:lol culpable

Guilt by association. That's all you got. Nothing else.

Snowflake.

So, you think he should be allowed to have his cake and eat it to?

His gf should be allowed to shit talk prospective employers while he idly does nothing?

[Pavlov]

So, you think he should be allowed to have his cake and eat it to?

His gf should be allowed to shit talk prospective employers while he idly does nothing?Think about what you're saying.

His girlfriend sent a tweet. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

:lmao middle school snowflake

[DMC]

Think about what you're saying.

His girlfriend sent a tweet. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

:lmao middle school snowflake
:lol this from the same guy who said it was stupid for a media personality to tweet something like Curt did.

:lol Chumpy desperately trying to redefine "snowflake" to mean anyone who's concerned about anything instead of the safe spacers and microaggression whiners.
:lol leveling

Chump, you should have stuck with the "ding" schtick and used it sparingly, but you just couldn't. Now you're just full blown spam posting again.

[Pavlov]

:lol this from the same guy who said it was stupid for a media personality to tweet something like Curt did.It was. I didn't say CK's girlfriend was smart.


:lol Chumpy desperately trying to redefine "snowflake" to mean anyone who's concerned about anything instead of the safe spacers and microaggression whiners.
:lol levelingYou're the one that's so sensitive about tweets with racial jokes.


Chump, you should have stuck with the "ding" schtick and used it sparingly, but you just couldn't. Now you're just full blown spam posting again.:lol your shtick is being a white victim

[DMC]

It was. I didn't say CK's girlfriend was smart.

Shouldn't be a problem since it cannot be associated with CK himself, according to you.


You're the one that's so sensitive about tweets with racial jokes.

Yes, it's everyone but you that's sensitive.


:lol your shtick is being a white victim
Sure it is Chumpy. You're the first to drag race into it.

[Pavlov]

Shouldn't be a problem since it cannot be associated with CK himself, according to you.I never claimed that NFL owners and FO personnel would not be snowflakes.


Yes, it's everyone but you that's sensitive.It is very clear who is sensitive about this one.


Sure it is Chumpy. You're the first to drag race into it.:lol no. You're the first to declare yourself a second amendment hero then spend all your time trying to weasel out of it for some reason.

I'm sure your new buddy appreciates the assist, tho. Are you going to ask for his personal information too?

[Avante]

Owner,,,,I need another QB and you need a job, so here's the deal.......there will be no disrespecting the flag/anthem here,..ok? If you plan on playing that here then this interview is over. So...?
CK....ok, I do need a job.
Owner....great, now let's talk $$$$.

How many people can go to their work place with a personal agenda?

How many young black guys own an NFL team? So just how damn dumb are these guys?

[MultiTroll]

Boy CK and his girlfriend sure showed that Ravens owner. :rolleyes

[DMC]

I never claimed that NFL owners and FO personnel would not be snowflakes.

Either it's stupid or it's not stupid.


It is very clear who is sensitive about this one.

Yes it is.


:lol no. You're the first to declare yourself a second amendment hero then spend all your time trying to weasel out of it for some reason.

I'm sure your new buddy appreciates the assist, tho. Are you going to ask for his personal information too?

Tweeting is stupid, tweeting isn't stupid. It depends on your narrative.

[Pavlov]

Either it's stupid or it's not stupid.Yep.


Yes it is.Yep.



Tweeting is stupid, tweeting isn't stupid. It depends on your narrative.Depends on the tweet.

[spurraider21]

At any given time, you can find a handful of failure starting QBs. That's the nature of the beast. Pointing to one of them as a reason for CK getting screwed does not pass the muster. CK in his own right was a failure, which is why he was benched, dude. Ask yourself if you'd want to roll with a diva backup QB.
Those were all teams with backups who had very different styles than the starter, exactly what you claimed teams try to avoid. It doesn't hold ip

Age 25 and ninety percent career completion percentage. But you're not alone in your disgraceful dismissal. One snowflake media reporter called it "yet another mediocre quarterback signed instead of Colin Kaepernick."
:lol Ryan nassib

[Spurtacular]

Depends on the tweet.

That goes against post after post of pretending twitter is nothing to take seriously. You can't even stay consistent with your shit (cost you can't). You should've just redacted or at least downplayed your 'Baltimore snowflakes' comment. Instead, you just made yourself look like an idiot while we all had a good laugh. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Those were all teams with backups who had very different styles than the starter, exactly what you claimed teams try to avoid. It doesn't hold ip

:lol Ryan nassib

For all I know Ryan Nassib is nothing special. Of course, Colin Kaepernick sucks balls; and I'm not the one who's crying about it.

[Pavlov]

That goes against post after post of pretending twitter is nothing to take seriously. You can't even stay consistent with your shit (cost you can't). You should've just redacted or at least downplayed your 'Baltimore snowflakes' comment. Instead, you just made yourself look like an idiot while we all had a good laugh. :lolPeople take twitter seriously. Doesn't mean they should take twitter seriously, snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

People take twitter seriously. Doesn't mean they should take twitter seriously, snowflake.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?:lol You're moving the goalposts to agree with me.

[Spurtacular]

:lol You're moving the goalposts to agree with me.

Simple question, bro.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

Simple question, bro.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?
:lol already answered before you asked

[Spurtacular]

:lol already answered before you asked

I don't know why that's funny. For the sake of clarity, Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

I don't know why that's funny. For the sake of clarity, Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?
Clarity for whom?

[Spurtacular]

Clarity for whom?

We gonna do this thing where we spend two pages trying to get you to answer a simple question? And you only do that when you're dead to rights, btw. So, we gonna skip the charade this time around?

[Pavlov]

We gonna do this thing where we spend two pages trying to get you to answer a simple question? And you only do that when you're dead to rights, btw. So, we gonna skip the charade this time around?
My position is clear. I can't understand it for you. The tweet was stupid. Also snowflakes like you exist.

[Spurtacular]

My position is clear. I can't understand it for you. The tweet was stupid. Also snowflakes like you exist.

And in what post # did you answer the question of Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

And in what post # did you answer the question of Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?:lol CK again.

Guilt by association.

Now you're demanding post #s.

I said it was stupid to tweet and people like you are snowflakes. That's it.

[Spurtacular]

:lol CK again.

Guilt by association.

Now you're demanding post #s.

I said it was stupid to tweet and people like you are snowflakes. That's it.

Saying it's stupid to tweet is not an answer to the question; it's a specific prescribed strategy in spite of the fact. Given that CK's bitch did tweet, the question is: Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

Saying it's stupid to tweet is not an answer to the questionYes it is. Reasons have been given. You don't like it. Too bad.

[Spurtacular]

Yes it is. Reasons have been given. You don't like it. Too bad.

You're answering a different question.

Q: Is it advisable to tweet?
A: (Via Pavlov) No, it's stupid to tweet.

Q: Should a tweeter responsibly tweet?
A: (Via Pavlov) No, it's stupid to tweet.

Sorry, your answer is not compatible.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

You're answering a different question.

Q: Is it advisable to tweet?
A: (Via Pavlov) No, it's stupid to tweet.

Q: Should a tweeter responsibly tweet?
A: (Via Pavlov) No, it's stupid to tweet.

Sorry, your answer is not compatible.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?You missed it. I understand you missed it. You just aren't very intelligent.

[Spurtacular]

You missed it. I understand you missed it. You just aren't very intelligent.

I reviewed it and found no answer. What's the post #?

[Pavlov]

I reviewed it and found no answer. What's the post #?:lmao

Thanks for proving you aren't very intelligent.

[Spurtacular]

You missed it. I understand you missed it. You just aren't very intelligent.

I'm not intelligent? You just claimed that the following was an answer to the question:

"I said it was stupid to tweet and people like you are snowflakes. That's it."

:lmao That's obviously not an answer to the question, dumb ass.

Now, answer the question.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

Thanks for proving you aren't very intelligent.

You don't win debates (by avoiding the question / pretending you answered it).

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

:lmao more demands.

I said it was stupid.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao more demands.

I said it was stupid.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

Why do I think you won't answer the question? Because you know you'll look like a tragic idiot no matter what direct answer you give to the question. You know it as well.

[Pavlov]

Why do I think you won't answer the question? Because you know you'll look like a tragic idiot no matter what direct answer you give to the question. You know it as well.I said it was stupid.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

Answer the question.

[Spurtacular]

I said it was stupid.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

Answer the question.

So that you don't have to answer the question directly. We both know the question is not is it smart/stupid to tweet. Thus your answer is N/A.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

So that you don't have to answer the question directly. We both know the question is not is it smart/stupid to tweet. Thus your answer is N/A.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?Nope, I said it was stupid long before you showed how stupid you were in not understanding it.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

Answer the question.

[Spurtacular]

Nope, I said it was stupid long before you showed how stupid you were in not understanding it.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

Answer the question.

Dude, I just answered the question DIRECTLY. You not liking the answer does not merit a re-ask.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?

[Pavlov]

Dude, I just answered the question DIRECTLY. You not liking the answer does not merit a re-ask.

Should CK (and his bitch) have taken twitter seriously or not?I was very clear about this.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

Answer the question.

Also :lol still trying so hard to sneak CK in there.

[Spurtacular]

I was very clear about this.

Why do you think I said it was stupid?

Answer the question.

Also :lol still trying so hard to sneak CK in there.

Pavlov: Why do you think I said it was stupid?
Winning Debater: So that you don't have to answer the question directly. We both know the question is not is it smart/stupid to tweet. Thus your answer is N/A.

[Pavlov]

Pavlov: Why do you think I said it was stupid?
Winning Debater: So that you don't have to answer the question directly. We both know the question is not is it smart/stupid to tweet. Thus your answer is N/A.
No one has ever won a debate by declaring himself the winner in the third person.

Also :lmao you don't even understand the question. This is simple stuff.

[Spurtacular]

No one has ever won a debate by declaring himself the winner in the third person.

Also :lmao you don't even understand the question. This is simple stuff.

"Why do you think I said it was stupid?"

I think my answer shows that I perfectly understand the question. Even if you don't consider it the right answer as you'd like to define it (and you do consider it the right answer), I still did answer the question. I clearly understand it. But now you're just showing how trite you're willing to make this as each move you are in check.

[Pavlov]

"Why do you think I said it was stupid?"Well, answer it.

[Spurtacular]

Well, answer it.

You do realize your question is specifically why do I think you asked the question? I answered that. If your question was 'why is it stupid to tweet,' then you'd have a case. Are you really this stupid, or is this just the level of obstinance that you're willing to employ?

[Pavlov]

You do realize your question is specifically why do I think you asked the question?Wrong.

Try again.

[Spurtacular]

Wrong.

Try again.

Terse posts won't give you comeback, kid.

[Pavlov]

Terse posts won't give you comeback, kid.Is that English?

[Spurtacular]

Is that English?

Maybe, this is on me. After all, you were in checkmate and I still pushed as if that was not the case. Not everyone can be gracious losers.

[Pavlov]

Maybe, this is on me. After all, you were in checkmate and I still pushed as if that was not the case. Not everyone can be gracious losers.Since your question was answered before you asked it, there is no victory to be had.

Sorry. It's all been settled for awhile now. Thanks again for backing into agreeing with me.

[Spurtacular]

Since your question was answered before you asked it, there is no victory to be had.

Sorry. It's all been settled for awhile now. Thanks again for backing into agreeing with me.

I guess throwing out illogical assertions is your way of throwing a tantrum in lieu of hitting the walls.

And funnily enough I did answer your question while you ran from my question.

[Pavlov]

I guess throwing out illogical assertions is your way of throwing a tantrum in lieu of hitting the walls.One can always tell you're frustrated when you break out the thesaurus.


And funnily enough I did answer your questionYou did not.

[Spurtacular]

One can always tell you're frustrated when you break out the thesaurus.

You did not.

What you call a thesaurus, I call just understanding the application of words. But I do agree that you love to define people's moods in a cheap attempt to deflect from your ineptitude.

[Pavlov]

What you call a thesaurus, I call just understanding the application of words. But I do agree that you love to define people's moods in a cheap attempt to deflect from your ineptitude.:lmao See what I mean?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao See what I mean?

I see that you may be insecure. But I needn't harp on that. I'd just be kicking you while you're down.

[Pavlov]

I see that you may be insecure. But I needn't harp on that. I'd just be kicking you while you're down.You're the one who can't figure out why I said her tweet was stupid.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one who can't figure out why I said her tweet was stupid.

I've put forth the answer. You're free to tell me in which you feel I've erred.

[Pavlov]

I've put forth the answer. You're free to tell me in which you feel I've erred.You've erred by answering incorrectly.

[spurraider21]

You're the one who can't figure out why I said her tweet was stupid.
Why do you prefer going in circles instead of just restating your answer

[Pavlov]

Why do you prefer going in circles instead of just restating your answer

In this case I want to see if he can figure it out. Apparently he cannot.

People should be careful what they tweet because billionaire snowflakes will flip out and not hire your boyfriend or block your cancer having ass from expressing your political opinion.

[Spurtacular]

You've erred by answering incorrectly.

Are you really that afraid to return to the substantive dialogue?

[Pavlov]

Are you really that afraid to return to the substantive dialogue?:lmao you missed it again!

[Spurtacular]

Why do you prefer going in circles instead of just restating your answer

1. He knows I answered his question (correctly).
2. He doesn't want to return to the point of conversation in which he'll look like a bitch.
3. This is his patented stalling / avoidance technique.

[Pavlov]

1. He knows I answered his question (correctly).
2. He doesn't want to return to the point of conversation in which he'll look like a bitch.
3. This is his patented stalling / avoidance technique.:lol you're still missing it.

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're still missing it.

You're still stalling.

[Pavlov]

You're still stalling.I completely spelled it out for you. I can't understand it for you.
In this case I want to see if he can figure it out. Apparently he cannot.

People should be careful what they tweet because billionaire snowflakes will flip out and not hire your boyfriend or block your cancer having ass from expressing your political opinion.

[Spurtacular]

I completely spelled it out for you. I can't understand it for you.

Hmm. From an "edited" post. But okay, we can progress forth. That is certainly an answer to the question finally.

[Pavlov]

Hmm. From an "edited" post. But okay, we can progress forth. That is certainly an answer to the question finally.I had already said it long ago. Thanks again for agreeing with me.

[Spurtacular]

I had already said it long ago.

Post the alleged answer from long ago, then.

[Spurtacular]

People should be careful what they tweet because billionaire snowflakes will flip out and not hire your boyfriend or block your cancer having ass from expressing your political opinion.

:lmao "political opinion."
:lmao When you get a job, slam your boss, get fired, then get mad because he doesn't like your "political opinion."

[Spurtacular]

People should be careful what they tweet because billionaire snowflakes will flip out and not hire your boyfriend or block your cancer having ass from expressing your political opinion.

Well, you had to hedge (finally) because you had criticized Curt Schilling for not watching what he tweeted (and you had been called out for being the bitch you are). But you're still pretending that it was reasonable for CK's bitch to shit talk his prospective employer and that he's a victim. SJW snowflakes like you never think they have to take responsibility for their actions.

[Pavlov]

Post the alleged answer from long ago, then.Nope. You're free to use the search function.


:lmao "political opinion."
:lmao When you get a job, slam your boss, get fired, then get mad because he doesn't like your "political opinion."Different tweet, different person. You really can't keep track of things.


Well, you had to hedge (finally) because you had criticized Curt Schilling for not watching what he tweeted (and you had been called out for being the bitch you are). But you're still pretending that it was reasonable for CK's bitch to shit talk his prospective employer and that he's a victim. SJW snowflakes like you never think they have to take responsibility for their actions.I said they were both stupid. :lol at your still trying to blame CK for someone else's tweet. Guilt by association.

[Spurtacular]

Nope. You're free to use the search function.

You clearly don't want your standard avoidance to be properly analyzed. It's alright; we all know you ran in circles like a bitch.


Different tweet, different person.

Sorry I figured you were prattling on; I didn't realize you were going to make this about your Trump daddy issues, too.


I said they were both stupid. :lol at your still trying to blame CK for someone else's tweet. Guilt by association.

You had two completely different initial reactions/assertions. For Schilling it was his fault for not being more mindful. For CK it was that he was a victim. Patented SJW snowflake mentality! :lmao

[Pavlov]

CK didn't send the tweet. Guilt by association.