Damn Leroids goes Kim Kong on Trump publicly calls him a bum!

[da_suns_fan]

Trump is doing fine. That has to be driving you crazy.

Trumps as bad as everyone said he would be. You just didnt care.

So dont tell me about having respect for our country when you dont give a shit.

[SnakeBoy]

Trigger warning.

912384061615824897

Triggered? I couldn't be happier. Please God let this continue to be the liberal message to the white working class.

[Spurminator]

Triggered? I couldn't be happier. Please God let this continue to be the liberal message to the white working class.

Did I quote you?

You've already made your point clear. You're happy that your fellow conservatives are so sensitive to identity politics, and you like that their feelings can be manipulated to vote the way you want them to.

What a dignified worldview.

[SnakeBoy]

Did I quote you?

You've already made your point clear. You're happy that your fellow conservatives are so sensitive to identity politics, and you like that their feelings can be manipulated to vote the way you want them to.

What a dignified worldview.

What do you think Democrats have been trying to do for years and are still trying to do. Keep the base riled up and hope for a good turn out.

Maybe not dignified but it's not naive either.

It's easier for the GOP since their base doesn't consist of the most unreliable voting blocks.

[SnakeBoy]

Did I quote you?


So? If your looking for a private conversation with rmt then pm her.

[hitmanyr2k]

What do you think Democrats have been trying to do for years and are still trying to do. Keep the base riled up and hope for a good turn out.

Maybe not dignified but it's not naive either.

It's easier for the GOP since their base doesn't consist of the most unreliable voting blocks.

Just like Republicans with the War on coal, the war on Christianity, the war on religious freedom, the war on Christmas :lol , the War on denim, etc.

[SnakeBoy]

What a dignified worldview.

Statues and pussyhats :cry so dignified :cry

[SnakeBoy]

Just like Republicans with the War on coal, the war on Christianity, the war on religious freedom, the war on Christmas :lol , the War on denim, etc.

Politics are fun to watch

Most don't seem to be able to separate themselves from their personal views enough to just enjoy the show

[Chris]

Trump is doing fine. That has to be driving you crazy.

tlongII

[Spurminator]

What do you think Democrats have been trying to do for years and are still trying to do. Keep the base riled up and hope for a good turn out.

Maybe not dignified but it's not naive either.

It's easier for the GOP since their base doesn't consist of the most unreliable voting blocks.

I'm sure this is also the worldview of certain Democrat strategists. Doesn't mean I respect it on their end, either. Let me know their SpursTalk handle and I'll tell them directly.


So? If your looking for a private conversation with rmt then pm her.

I quoted a relevant post and said "Trigger Warning" and you replied as if that warning was for you.


Statues and pussyhats :cry so dignified :cry

I've never worn a pussyhat.

The statue protests arose from a local government deciding to remove a statue, and conservatives/nazis throwing a shit fit that resulted in a dead person, so that's not a great point.

[Spurminator]

And I'm not sure "I'm gonna participate in this somewhat crass fashion statement to show my support for women's reproductive Rights" is really on the same scale as "I'm glad half of the country is getting worked up by the President over meaningless symbolic gestures because that means they'll vote my way."

[SnakeBoy]

I'm sure this is also the worldview of certain Democrat strategists.

It's like you don't know what worldview means.

[SnakeBoy]

And I'm not sure "I'm gonna participate in this somewhat crass fashion statement to show my support for women's reproductive Rights" is really on the same scale as "I'm glad half of the country is getting worked up by the President over meaningless symbolic gestures because that means they'll vote my way."

Yeah democratics never get worked up over symbols

[Spurminator]

It's like you don't know what worldview means.

How do you figure?

[Spurminator]

Yeah democratics never get worked up over symbols

That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about claiming to not care about those symbols but being happy that ideologically similar people do care.

[Splits]

Dayummmm the racist right is fuckin' triggered...


Trump's NFL attacks set record on Breitbart

After breaking with him on other issues, Trump's alt-right media supporters rally around his criticism of football protests.

By JASON SCHWARTZ 09/25/2017 01:53 PM EDT

President Donald Trump’s repeated broadsides against professional athletes dominated the news over the weekend, with pundits from ESPN to CNN to Fox News questioning the wisdom of his statements. But the story was sharply different on leading right-wing news sites, where Trump’s attacks on players like Stephen Curry and Colin Kaepernick received not just huge attention but acclaim.

Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alexander Marlow said metrics indicated that a Sunday morning post on the topic by the site’s Facebook account had greater reach than any post in Breitbart history.

“There is an unbelievable amount of interest,” Marlow said on Sunday night. “I’m looking at my 10 or 11 top stories now, and maybe 7 of them are NFL related.”

“This is the radicalization of the NFL right now,” he said. “It's being encouraged by the media, it's being encouraged by Hollywood and I don’t think that people, at least if the comments and the phone calls to Breitbart are any reflection, I don’t think they like it. They just want neutrality, they don’t want politics in football games.”

With the president facing potential setbacks on a number of fronts, his seemingly out of the blue call for protesting athletes to lose their jobs represents the type of cultural issue capable of rallying his conservative base. Breitbart has opposed the president with greater frequency of late—particularly in Alabama’s senate special election—so the NFL issue provided an opportunity for Trump to remind supporters of why they like him.

The Alabama election may have received the top headline spot on Breitbart for much of Sunday, but as games rolled on throughout the day, from the Ravens and Jaguars’ morning kickoff in London through the Washington-Oakland tilt in primetime, Breitbart’s homepage was loaded with NFL stories. One typical headline read: “NFL snowflakes melt: coaches and owners join massive anti-Trump protest—in U.K.”

The story had nearly 33,000 comments as of early Monday afternoon, tens of thousands more than any other non-sports related story currently on the site’s homepage.

“A lot of people know Andrew Breitbart for his quote, politics is downstream from culture, so the cultural issues that fold in the politics tend to be utterly explosive in terms of the interest level from our readers,” Marlow said.

That level of interest appeared to be consistent across other right-leaning sites. The issue received top billing on Drudge Report, Infowars and The Daily Caller, where the lead story most of the day focused on Alejandro Villanueva, a former Army Ranger who served in Afghanistan and was the only Pittsburgh Steeler to emerge from the locker room for the national anthem.

Five of The Daily Caller’s top 10 stories were NFL related, according to Geoffrey Ingersoll, the site’s editor-in-chief. He believed the NFL story attracted readers simply because of its news value, but also because, “I think we've seen a steady encroachment of politics into once pristine places. This creep has been occurring in sports for a long time, and it seems to be hitting a crescendo of sorts.”

Villanueva’s story—with its military connections—was featured prominently on other sites, like The Gateway Pundit, as well. The site also ran headlines, including: “UNREAL. NFL Players stand for “God save the Queen” and kneel for US National Anthem in London” and “President Trump continues to slam anti-cop NFL for allowing players to disrespect flag and country.”

“Our readers are very upset about these continued anthem protests,” emailed Jim Hoft, the founder of The Gateway Pundit. “It is all people talked about.” :lmao triggered snowflakes
Marlow said that whenever Breitbart covers the protests by NFL players on its website or Sirius radio shows, no topic elicits more comments or call-ins. Social media engagement over the weekend was also through the roof.

The text of the Breitbart Facebook post that went viral reads: “Dear NFL: We will not support millionaire ingrates who hate America and disrespect our Armed Forces and Veterans. Who wins a football game has ZERO impact on our lives. Who fights for and defends our nation has EVERY impact on our lives. We stand with the Heroes, not a bunch of rich, entitled, arrogant, ungrateful, anti-American degenerates. Signed, We the People.” :lmao holy shit

As of Monday afternoon, the post had racked up more than half a million shares, more than 260,000 reactions, and 21,000 comments.

Marlow believes that his audience’s strong reaction is driven by a desire to see sports and politics clearly separated from each other. “So much of America is politicized,” he said, “why sports too? And that's the question that the audience is asking most right now.”

[Pavlov]

No, MJ and Federer never spout political views because they want to appeal to the widest audience and they know that there are people of all different persuasions.“One of the fundamental rights this country is founded on was freedom of speech, and we have a long tradition of nonviolent, peaceful protest,” Jordan wrote. “Those who exercise the right to peacefully express themselves should not be demonized or ostracized. At a time of increasing divisiveness and hate in this country, we should be looking for ways to work together and support each other and not create more division. I support Commissioner Adam Silver, the NBA, its players and all those who wish to exercise their right to free speech.”

Uh-oh.

Or were you talking about a different MJ?

[SnakeBoy]

“One of the fundamental rights this country is founded on was freedom of speech, and we have a long tradition of nonviolent, peaceful protest,” Jordan wrote. “Those who exercise the right to peacefully express themselves should not be demonized or ostracized. At a time of increasing divisiveness and hate in this country, we should be looking for ways to work together and support each other and not create more division. I support Commissioner Adam Silver, the NBA, its players and all those who wish to exercise their right to free speech.”

Uh-oh.

Or were you talking about a different MJ?

:lol Good stuff from MJ

[hater]

:lmao Marc Anthony going balls deep

912428240387678208

[ducks]

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2017/09/25/broncos-von-miller-loses-sponsorship/

[DAF86]

What happened in the last Argentina elections? Oh wait, I don't give a shit.

A friend of Trump (really, not making this up) won. After years of "communism" a right-winger won. The cycle of life, tbh.

[DAF86]

Refusing to stand for the national anthem is considered disrespectful. It's just the way it is.

What about Jehovah's witnesses? Their religion forbids them from singing the anthem or paying tribute to any country's flag. Should we consider them disrespectful for doing what their religion tells them to do? Should we call them "sons of bitches" because of that?

[Chucho]

What about Jehovah's witnesses? Their religion forbids them from singing the anthem or paying tribute to any country's flag. Should we consider them disrespectful for doing what their religion tells them to do? Should we call them "sons of bitches" because of that?
No. Call them sons of bitches when they knock your door peddling their faith in the most invasive way.

[DAF86]

No. Call them sons of bitches when they knock your door peddling their faith in the most invasive way.

Can I call christians sons of bitches for being by far the more invasive of all religions?

[SnakeBoy]

What about Jehovah's witnesses? Their religion forbids them from singing the anthem or paying tribute to any country's flag. Should we consider them disrespectful for doing what their religion tells them to do? Should we call them "sons of bitches" because of that?

Only if you are using the phrase in a friendly southern style the way Trump did.

[DAF86]

Only if you are using the phrase in a friendly southern style the way Trump did.

That's a whole nother level of spinning son. I give you that. :lol

[SnakeBoy]

That's a whole nother level of spinning son. I give you that. :lol

It's not spinning. Trump was just trying to fit in in Alabama. Same kind of shit happened to George.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhaap42I2sc

[DAF86]

It's not spinning. Trump was just trying to fit in in Alabama. Same kind of shit happened to George.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhaap42I2sc

C'mon son, you don't really think it's OK for the president of a nation to publicly say "sons of bitches" in front of millions of people, right? :lol

[Chucho]

Can I call christians sons of bitches for being by far the more invasive of all religions?
I don't care what you do. I've never had Christians come up to my door tho.

[DAF86]

I don't care what you do. I've never had Christians come up to my door tho.

They don't need to. They already have you by the balls. Tell me, what year it is?

[SnakeBoy]

C'mon son, you don't really think it's OK for the president of a nation to publicly say "sons of bitches" in front of millions of people, right? :lol

I'm saying our great President is being unfairly attacked by a media smear campaign that is trying to vilify him for simply embracing the cultural diversity of this great nation.

[DAF86]

Sure thing son. :lol

[Chucho]

They don't need to. They already have you by the balls. Tell me, what year it is?

LOL. Stereotyping. I don't even get where you're going with this, but I'll play your game you rogue. 2017 AD.

[DAF86]

LOL. Stereotyping. I don't even get where you're going with this, but I'll play your game you rogue. 2017 AD.

Exactly.

[Chucho]

Exactly.
Oh man, you're stupid.

[DAF86]

Oh man, you're stupid.

Why? You brought up invasive religions. What's more invasive than giving the Earth an arbitrary date and forcing people to use it despite most of that people not believing in said date? :lol

[Chucho]

Why? You brought up invasive religions. What's more invasive than giving the Earth an arbitrary date and forcing people to use it despite most of that people not believing in said date? :lol


Oh man, you're Boots-level stupid.

[DAF86]

Oh man, you're Boots-level stupid.

Not really debunking any point, but I will let you leave son. Go live to fight another battle. :lol

[Chucho]

Not really debunking any point, but I will let you leave son. Go live to fight another battle. :lol
And you tried to argue a hyperbolic comment about Jehovah's Witnesses door knocking and invading personal space with faith solicitation with something that happened 500 years ago. Like I said, you're Boots-level stupid. "Dey got ya by da balls. DERP".:lmao

[HI-FI]

Chooch

[DAF86]

And you tried to argue a hyperbolic comment about Jehovah's Witnesses door knocking and invading personal space with faith solicitation with something that happened 500 years ago. Like I said, you're Boots-level stupid. "Dey got ya by da balls. DERP".:lmao

Actually, it must have been like 2017 years ago, tbh. :lol

[Chucho]

Actually, it must have been like 2017 years ago, tbh. :lol
Sounds like you've got yourself by the balls, DERPsky. Get some context to your "point", O Woken One.

[tlongII]

Why? You brought up invasive religions. What's more invasive than giving the Earth an arbitrary date and forcing people to use it despite most of that people not believing in said date? :lol

What date do you think we should use?

[DAF86]

Sounds like you've got yourself by the balls, DERPsky. Get some context to your "point", O Woken One.

What more context do I need? I'm a non-christian, using christian conventions. That's the whole point I'm making to prove the "invasiveness" of christianity. I thought it was pretty clear, tbh. :lol

[Chucho]

What date do you think we should use?
Some convoluted petroglyph shit the Mayans scratched onto caves and we should tell time with a sun dial. We need to know the world is ending in 2012, but it's not 2012 yet, according to his preferred calendar.

[DAF86]

What date do you think we should use?

Since I have already grew up with this one, I would rather keep it. But I don't really care anyway. I wasn't complaining, tbh, I'm just pointing out that no religion is more invasive than the christian one.

I don't know why you get so worked up over a simple, obvious fact, tbh. :lol

[Chucho]

What more context do I need? I'm a non-christian, using christian conventions. That's the whole point I'm making to prove the "invasiveness" of christianity. I thought it was pretty clear, tbh. :lol

Ok, what happened 500 years ago makes it invasive, how? Using gun powder in modern weaponry makes the Chinese responsible for all the gun violence according to your stupid train of thought.

[DAF86]

Ok, what happened 500 years ago makes it invasive, how? Using gun powder in modern weaponry makes the Chinese responsible for all the gun violence according to your stupid train of thought.

Because it still makes an impact today, tbh.

[Chucho]

When the vast majority of the world accepts a form of time keeping, it's because of an "invasive" religion. Mmhmmm...

[Chucho]

You do know what "invasive" means, right? And you do realize they've made nonChristian terms for the Gregorian calendar for simple minded, intolerant twits too, right?

[Chucho]

Either way, you're still Boots-level stupid. G'day mate.

[DAF86]

When the vast majority of the world accepts a form of time keeping, it's because of an "invasive" religion. Mmhmmm...

Yes.

The definition of invasive:


Tending to spread especially in a quick or aggressive manner

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/invasive

There you go son.

[DAF86]

You do know what "invasive" means, right? And you do realize they've made nonChristian terms for the Gregorian calendar for simple minded, intolerant twits too, right?

Do you know the definition of invasive? I put it up there son.

[tlongII]

Since I have already grew up with this one, I would rather keep it. But I don't really care anyway. I wasn't complaining, tbh, I'm just pointing out that no religion is more invasive than the christian one.

I don't know why you get so worked up over a simple, obvious fact, tbh. :lol

I’m not worked up. The date convention is something good that came from Christianity. It’s good to have standardization for a point of reference.

[HI-FI]

Since I have already grew up with this one, I would rather keep it. But I don't really care anyway. I wasn't complaining, tbh, I'm just pointing out that no religion is more invasive than the christian one.

I don't know why you get so worked up over a simple, obvious fact, tbh. :lol
DAF, seems like a lot of leftists are triggered by Christianity and cumdrunk on Islam. Are you that way as well?

[DAF86]

I’m not worked up. The date convention is something good that came from Christianity. It’s good to have standardization for a point of reference.

Well, your friend Chucho does seem to be worked up, tbh.

And yeah, I'm not saying it's either good or bad. I'm just saying that it's something that christianity imposed.

[Chucho]

Yes.

The definition of invasive:



https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/invasive

There you go son.

What was aggressive about the spread of the Gregorian calendar? Google it up, sweetie.

[Chucho]

Well, your friend Chucho (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20531) does seem to be worked up, tbh.

And yeah, I'm not saying it's either good or bad. I'm just saying that it's something that christianity imposed.

Im pointing out you got worked up over a hyperbolic comment so you could rage about Christianity and making a piss-poor rebuttal. Me calling you stupid for this, repeatedly, is not "worked up". You misused invasive. But whatevs.

[DAF86]

DAF, seems like a lot of leftists are triggered by Christianity and cumdrunk on Islam. Are you that way as well?

Nah son, I don't give a fuck about any kind of religion but if I have to choose one with a gun pointed to my head I would clearly choose christianity because of parties and gifts on december, and because it doesn't spawn crazy Kamikazes fucks, tbh.

[DAF86]

What was aggressive about the spread of the Gregorian calendar? Google it up, sweetie.

Do you know the definition of "or"?

[DAF86]

Im pointing out you got worked up over a hyperbolic comment so you could rage about Christianity and making a piss-poor rebuttal. Me calling you stupid for this, repeatedly, is not "worked up". You misused invasive. But whatevs.

I'm here laughing my ass off on a topic that really doesn't affect me on any kind of level, while you are there insulting. Who seems to be more worked up son? :lol

[Chucho]

Do you know the definition of "or"?

It took 200 years for the acceptance of the Gregorian calendar.

Now that you Googled, and learned the definition of "invasive", do yourself a favor and learn how to use it in a sentence properly.

[Chucho]

I'm here laughing my ass off on a topic that really doesn't affect me on any kind of level, while you are there insulting. Who seems to be more worked up son? :lol
You're the one who quoted an off-collar comment to segue into a comment of intolerance. It seems you got worked up and excited to make an ignorant comment. Me pointing that out doesn't make me "worked up" and you can't be counted on to know how to use words properly, as I pointed out.

[DAF86]

You're the one who quoted an off-collar comment to segue into a comment of intolerance. It seems you got worked up and excited to make an ignorant comment. Me pointing that out doesn't make me "worked up" and you can't be counted on to know how to use words properly, as I pointed out.

So, yours was an "off-collar" comment, but mine was a comment of "intolerance"? How very convenient for you. :lol

[DAF86]

It took 200 years for the acceptance of the Gregorian calendar.

Now that you Googled, and learned the definition of "invasive", do yourself a favor and learn how to use it in a sentence properly.

I make my living off words, definitions and semantics son. You are not going to get me there, tbh.

[SnakeBoy]

912435071641985024

No word on if he's been able to get back up yet.

[ducks]

someone should come behind him and kick him in the butt!

[Pavlov]

someone should come behind him and kick him in the butt!Why do you want an old black man to be assaulted and battered, ducks. He's not at work.

[florige]

someone should come behind him and kick him in the butt!



You tell em Ducks!

[baseline bum]

911702252993122304

https://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Robin-Lopez-Suns-Bench-Shock-Reaction.gif

[ElNono]

911702252993122304

https://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Robin-Lopez-Suns-Bench-Shock-Reaction.gif

:lmao

[monosylab1k]

911702252993122304

https://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Robin-Lopez-Suns-Bench-Shock-Reaction.gif

https://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Portland-Trailblazers-Robin-Lopez-Dance-on-Floor-After-Dunk.gif

[spurraider21]

911702252993122304

https://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Robin-Lopez-Suns-Bench-Shock-Reaction.gif
:lmao

Woulda been amazing if he posted the gif too

[rmt]

Nah son, I don't give a fuck about any kind of religion but if I have to choose one with a gun pointed to my head I would clearly choose christianity because of parties and gifts on december, and because it doesn't spawn crazy Kamikazes fucks, tbh.

Personally, the word I'd use is influential (for it to be accepted worldwide) - not invasive. And Christianity is more about Easter (and I don't mean Easter Bunnies and Eggs) than Christmas.