Official Trump sexual allegation watch thread

[djohn2oo8]

939287243755311104

Lordy it's coming.

[djohn2oo8]

940037230348845056

[dabom]

940037230348845056

I might actually watch TV for that. :lol

[Reck]

940049251211472896

:lmao
DarrinS :lol

[TSA]

939287243755311104

Lordy it's coming.

939304507229564928
:rollin Lordy! :rollin

[Reck]

939304507229564928
:rollin Lordy! :rollin

So she confirms the story that Trump is a creeper. Whether she's fine with it or not doesn't matter.

16 other women were not.

[dabom]

939304507229564928
:rollin Lordy! :rollin

Dude be grabbing everyone by the pussy. :lmao

[TSA]

So she confirms the story that Trump is a creeper. Whether she's fine with it or not doesn't matter.

16 other women were not.

Only a beta cuck would think that is creepy.

[Reck]

Only a beta cuck would think that is creepy.

Forcibly trying to kiss someone is not creepy?

I thought you had a wife...and a brand new daughter, TSA.

You mean to tell me if someone tries to move on your girl everything would be ok in your book?

And you talk about cucks. :lmao

TSA self outing himself as a cuckold. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Only a beta cuck would think that is creepy.You gonna be trying to kiss other women in elevators after you marry?

[dabom]

Forcibly trying to kiss someone is not creepy?

I thought you had a wife...and a brand new daughter, TSA.

You mean to tell me if someone tries to move on your girl everything would be ok in your book?

And you talk about cucks. :lmao

TSA self outing himself as a cuckold. :lmao

What a beta cuck. :lol

[TSA]

Forcibly trying to kiss someone is not creepy?

I thought you had a wife...and a brand new daughter, TSA.

You mean to tell me if someone tries to move on your girl everything would be ok in your book?

And you talk about cucks. :lmao

TSA self outing himself as a cuckold. :lmaoShe was neither threatened or offended, there was nothing forcible about it.

[TSA]

You gonna be trying to kiss other women in elevators after you marry?

I’m happily married thank you. Are you married or in a relationship?

[Pavlov]

I’m happily married thank you. Are you married or in a relationship?Yes.

You didn't answer the question.

You gonna be trying to kiss on women other than your wife in elevators?

[TSA]

Yes.Good for you. Married or in a relationship?


You didn't answer the question.

You gonna be trying to kiss on women other than your wife in elevators?No I won’t be. And how are you sure Trump was trying to kiss on women other than his wife?

“Former Fox News anchor Juliet Huddy said President Donald Trump tried to kiss her in an elevator around the time he married First Lady Melania.”

[Pavlov]

Good for you. Married or in a relationship?The latter.


No I won’t be.So, beta cuck?


And how are you sure Trump was trying to kiss on women other than his wife?

“Former Fox News anchor Juliet Huddy said President Donald Trump tried to kiss her in an elevator around the time he married First Lady Melania.”She's not the only one who has told this kind of story.

[TSA]

The latter.

So, beta cuck?

She's not the only one who has told this kind of story.

Good for you I hope you somehow find enough time out of your day to spend with he/she.

Again, a guy going in for a kiss isn’t a creeper.

We’re talking about this particular story, stay on track.

[Spurminator]

She was neither threatened or offended, there was nothing forcible about it.

That's a good soldier. Keep fighting the good fight.

[Reck]

Good for you I hope you somehow find enough time out of your day to spend with he/she.

Again, a guy going in for a kiss isn’t a creeper.

We’re talking about this particular story, stay on track.

The dude was married..and she thought his move was out of nowhere/left her feeling wierd.

She wasn't offended, fine. But she was also left feeling wierd. And said she was never left alone with him again which was probably her choice given what he tried to do.

That's a creep move. The end.

[Pavlov]

Good for you I hope you somehow find enough time out of your day to spend with he/she.You're still mad. I understand.


Again, a guy going in for a kiss isn’t a creeper.What if the guy going for a kiss from your wife alone? You cool with that? That would be beta cuck territory.


We’re talking about this particular story, stay on track.It's a bigger track than you want it to be. Tough shit. You may defend Trump to the death any way you wish -- but the allegations and his own corroborating admission exist and there's nothing you can do to make them go away.

[dabom]

The dude was married..and she thought his move was out of nowhere/left her feeling wierd.

She wasn't offended, fine. But she was also left feeling wierd. And said she was never left alone with him again which was probably her choice given what he tried to do.

That's a creep move. The end.

It confirms Trump's predator behavior.

He even admits to grabbing them by the pussy and they let him.

[TSA]

You're still mad. I understand.

What if the guy going for a kiss from your wife alone? You cool with that? That would be beta cuck territory.

It's a bigger track than you want it to be. Tough shit. You may defend Trump to the death any way you wish -- but the allegations and his own corroborating admission exist and there's nothing you can do to make them go away.

Your whole line of questioning assumes Trump was married when he leaned and tried to kiss the woman in the elevator. Until it’s established he was married or not your cute game of hypotheticals is pointless.

:lol mad...was wondering when you start projecting emotions it’d been a while

[Pavlov]

Your whole line of questioning assumes Trump was married when he leaned and tried to kiss the woman in the elevator. Until it’s established he was married or not your cute game of hypotheticals is pointless.Very beta cuck answer tbh. Good to know where you stand on these things.


:lol mad...was wondering when you start projecting emotions it’d been a whileSorry about springing the Cat Stevens mind control video on you. Had to be humiliating -- well, no. You deserved it trying to act like a crusader for the children.

[TSA]

Very beta cuck answer tbh. Good to know where you stand on these things. Was Trump married when he tried to kiss the unfrightened and unoffended woman in the elevator yes or no?


Sorry about springing the Cat Stevens mind control video on you. Had to be humiliating -- well, no. You deserved it trying to act like a crusader for the children.from way out of left field wtf white flag. You’re shook.
Log off.

[Pavlov]

Was Trump married when he tried to kiss the unfrightened and unoffended woman in the elevator yes or no?Sorry, it's a bigger track than you want it to be. His cheating on his wives is a matter of record. You can't cheat if you don't try for det kiss. I don't understand why you have to defend him to the death on every single issue, but your recently declared beta cuck status explains a lot tbh.


from way out of left field wtf white flag. You’re shook.
Log off.:lol OK, what made you so mad at me?

[TSA]

Sorry, it's a bigger track than you want it to be. His cheating on his wives is a matter of record. You can't cheat if you don't try for det kiss. I don't understand why you have to defend him to the death on every single issue, but your recently declared beta cuck status explains a lot tbh.

:lol OK, what made you so mad at me?

You want to make it a bigger track because you can’t confirm whether or not Trump was married and without that you realize the elevator story is a non-story.

Years ago, Trump tried to kiss a woman in the elevator. She wasn’t threatened nor offended. Have fun with that.

[Pavlov]

You want to make it a bigger track because you can’t confirm whether or not Trump was married and without that you realize the elevator story is a non-story.I don't consider the latest allegation the biggest one. Just another one that fits in with all the rest perfectly.


Years ago, Trump tried to kiss a woman in the elevator. She wasn’t threatened nor offended. Have fun with that.Today, TSA tried to deny there were any other accusations of sexual harassment and assault against Donald Trump.

He also admitted to being a beta cuck.

I had fun with that.

[Spurtacular]

Only a beta cuck would think that is creepy.

I don't remember one 'Trannies For Trump' sign during the election, tbh.

[Reck]

TSA, did you not read the page six article? It says he was married to Melania.

[djohn2oo8]

Lordy. Hopefully the Roy Moore defenders tune in.

[djohn2oo8]

I wonder if TSA thinks the fact that Trump said he would be dating a 10 year old later in life is creepy.

[djohn2oo8]

940205037594316800

[pgardn]

Only a beta cuck would think that is creepy.

Wow.

The sucker kiss out of nowhere is the preferred maneuver for alpha's. If you are a real boss of course.

Thanks, I'll write that down. Then I'll chastise myself for the rest of my life thinking I was nervous asking my wife out on a 1st date. I mean, if she would have already slutted it up for me in the elevator after a sucker kiss there would have been nothing to worry about. Hell, I could drag her by her hair and... help me out...

I guess I missed the caveman dating era.

[boutons_deux]

Two senators call for Trump's resignation over sexual assault, harassment allegations

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/11/politics/booker-merkley-trump-resignation/index.html

[boutons_deux]

Trump accusers to unite for first time, demand congressional investigation into allegations

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/364217-trump-accusers-to-unite-for-first-time-demand-congressional

[boutons_deux]

What Happened to the 16 Women Who Accused Trump of Sexual Misconduct

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/11/what-happened-to-trumps-16-sexual-misconduct-accusers.html

[boutons_deux]

The 19 Women Who Accused President Trump of Sexual Misconduct

The "Weinstein effect" continues to roil the nation’s power centers. But the allegations against the president have largely stayed in the background.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/what-about-the-19-women-who-accused-trump/547724/

[boutons_deux]

Here's the video of Trash's victims going on video record

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2lMN3kIjAA

[boutons_deux]

If only somebody in ABC would leak the tapes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpqJv8Qukzk

[djohn2oo8]

940228974994771969

[djohn2oo8]

940224464935182336

[DarrinS]

940224464935182336

Damn, he went in for the full Biden.

[djohn2oo8]

Damn, he went in for the full Biden.

Roy Moore and Trump sexual assault allegations amuse you? Do you assault women Darrin?

[boutons_deux]

I'd LOVE to see the 10 women who were ready to testify against Clarence Thomas until Biden shut them out.

Were they all black? or

"Hey, where are the white women at?" -- Sheriff Bart

[djohn2oo8]

940254360847704066

[TSA]

Wow.

The sucker kiss out of nowhere is the preferred maneuver for alpha's. If you are a real boss of course.

Thanks, I'll write that down. Then I'll chastise myself for the rest of my life thinking I was nervous asking my wife out on a 1st date. I mean, if she would have already slutted it up for me in the elevator after a sucker kiss there would have been nothing to worry about. Hell, I could drag her by her hair and... help me out...

I guess I missed the caveman dating era.

Sorry but there is nothing creepy about Trump going in for a kiss. The woman wasn't threatened nor offended. It's a non-story.

[Pavlov]

Sorry but there is nothing creepy about Trump going in for a kiss. The woman wasn't threatened nor offended. It's a non-story.:lol You even became a beta cuck for Trump.

[djohn2oo8]

Sorry but there is nothing creepy about Trump going in for a kiss. The woman wasn't threatened nor offended. It's a non-story.
She didn't want a kiss. He forced himself. You approve of forcing yourself upon women?

[djohn2oo8]

940256375489417216

[djohn2oo8]

940254360847704066
TSA how about her

[TSA]

She didn't want a kiss. He forced himself. You approve of forcing yourself upon women?

I don't consider going in for a kiss forcing yourself upon a woman. I've gone in for a kiss and been denied, has that never happened to you?

[TSA]

TSA how about her

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?

[TSA]

:lol You even became a beta cuck for Trump.

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?

[djohn2oo8]

940257931320287233

[djohn2oo8]

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?

The accusation has been made. Unless sexual assault only occurs when a democrat does it.

[djohn2oo8]

I don't consider going in for a kiss forcing yourself upon a woman. I've gone in for a kiss and been denied, has that never happened to you?

:lmao. Who goes in for a kiss without having any interaction first? Thats called forcing yourself.

[boutons_deux]

Congressional Dems should make a lot of noisy demands for Congressional hearings on sexual abuse by Trash and Clarence Thomas.

If Repugs refuse, then that's a huge campaign topic, along with the Repug wealth redistribution upwards.

[djohn2oo8]

Ahh I see. TSA has mostly avoided the Roy Moore thread. Seems like Pedophiles and Sexual Assault by Republicans really are a tough topic for him.

[TSA]

:lmao. Who goes in for a kiss without having any interaction first? Thats called forcing yourself.

You just make up lies and hope no one calls you on them. They had lunch together before he tried to kiss her, that would be having interaction first. Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?I've never refused to hypothetically defend my girlfriend in order to be a complete political sellout. You did.

[djohn2oo8]

940254360847704066

TSA she was kissed on the lips during the first introduction. Who does that during the first introduction? She did not want it.

[Pavlov]

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?Are all of them lying, TSA?

[TSA]

I've never refused to hypothetically defend my girlfriend in order to be a complete political sellout. You did.

Dodge #1

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?

[djohn2oo8]

How about putting his hand up someone's skirt?

[TSA]

Are all of them lying, TSA?

Dodge #1

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?

[djohn2oo8]

Dodge #1

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?

Do you believe every Franken accuser?

[Pavlov]

Dodge #1You don't get to say that anymore, beta cuck.


Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?TSA laser focused on one allegation.

Are all of the others lying?

Was Trump lying when he corroborated their stories?

[benefactor]

Per my usual, I don't have a dog in this race...but I think I'm more inclined to believe the girl instead of the guy that's on tape saying he has indeed behaved in this manner

[djohn2oo8]

So TSA's argument is if she didnt deny it then she must have wanted it. Seems like how most rapists/offenders operate.

[Pavlov]

Per my usual, I don't have a dog in this race...but I think I'm more inclined to believe the girl instead of the guy that's on tape saying he has indeed behaved in this manner:cryBut did you ever go for a kiss?:cry

[djohn2oo8]

:cryBut did you ever go for a kiss?:cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

So TSA's argument is if she didnt deny it then she must have wanted it. Seems like how most rapists/offenders operate.TSA won't even hypothetically defend his wife against sexual harassment.

Beta cuck.

[TSA]

You don't get to say that anymore, beta cuck.

TSA laser focused on one allegation.

Are all of the others lying?

Was Trump lying when he corroborated their stories?Dodge #2

Don't expect any answers until you answer the question posed to you first.

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?

[djohn2oo8]

I wonder if I go give her a kiss and she doesn't deny me what will TSA think.

[djohn2oo8]

Dodge #2

Don't expect any answers until you answer the question posed to you first.

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?

What if she is drunk? Does she have the capacity to deny you?

[RandomGuy]

939304507229564928
:rollin Lordy! :rollin

"Yes, it's true."

When you are a celebrity they let you do it.

[TSA]

Do you believe every Franken accuser?

Same goes for you. Answer the question if you expect an answer.

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?

[TSA]

So TSA's argument is if she didnt deny it then she must have wanted it. Seems like how most rapists/offenders operate.

:lol from kissing to rape

[TSA]

What if she is drunk? Does she have the capacity to deny you?

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?

[djohn2oo8]

:lol from kissing to rape
Your argument is if they don't deny you then they must have wanted it. Which is not always true.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA must like forcing himself on women.

[RandomGuy]

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?

No. But then I have been happily married for 20+ years, so my experience is somewhat skewed.

Trump on the other hand has a 40 year history of creepy shit.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/galleries/x701/181683.jpg

[djohn2oo8]

Same goes for you. Answer the question if you expect an answer.

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?
Do you believe every franken accuser? You are the one with his photo.

[RandomGuy]

https://www.soladoni.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/kiss-lol-04.jpg

[Pavlov]

Dodge #2Doesn't work anymore.


Don't expect any answers until you answer the question posed to you first.The answer is no.

I don't expect any answers from you anymore after you became a complete pussy in the pizzagate thread. You failed then and you're failing now with your additional transformation into a beta cuck just to defend Trump.

No more questions three.

[djohn2oo8]

https://www.soladoni.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/kiss-lol-04.jpg
https://static.deathandtaxesmag.com/uploads/2016/10/trump-1476754159-compressed.jpg

[RandomGuy]

https://peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/trump3.jpg?w=2000


If you can remember the creepy shit with the French President's wife.

[Pavlov]

TSA must like forcing himself on women.Or got turned down a lot.

[RandomGuy]

https://i.amz.mshcdn.com/qtYvyVF06cls2_o7P6lJKRxfY8s=/600x338/2016%2F02%2F01%2Fa9%2FDonaldTrump.02409.jpg

[djohn2oo8]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClWMnH-WIAEVIsj.jpg

[lefty]

"Missed" terrorist attack in NY.
More like Trump faking an attack in an attempt to make us forget about his Jerusalem fiasco.
That twerp is so predictable.

DEFLECTING

[djohn2oo8]

https://i.amz.mshcdn.com/qtYvyVF06cls2_o7P6lJKRxfY8s=/600x338/2016%2F02%2F01%2Fa9%2FDonaldTrump.02409.jpg
lol same time my nigga

[TSA]

Do you believe every franken accuser? You are the one with his photo.

Answer the question if you expect an answer.

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?

[RandomGuy]

https://static.deathandtaxesmag.com/uploads/2016/04/GettyImages-3470309-1-compressed.jpg

[RandomGuy]

https://powws.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/hope-hicks-affair-with-trump-768x512.jpg

[Pavlov]

Answer the question if you expect an answer.Sorry, you surrendered that game a ling time ago.

[DisAsTerBot]

Answer the question if you expect an answer.

Is she one of the same ones that came out of the woodworks during the election and then disappeared?

What the fuck does that matter? Where was the girl in your avatar before she made the accusations? Where is she now? See how that makes no difference? See how you’re an idiot?

[RandomGuy]

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Bush: Whatever you want.

Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.

[djohn2oo8]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/07/22/15/367D8C4900000578-0-image-a-28_1469196210581.jpg

[TSA]

No. But then I have been happily married for 20+ years, so my experience is somewhat skewed.

Trump on the other hand has a 40 year history of creepy shit.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/galleries/x701/181683.jpg

that's creepy?

[RandomGuy]

https://fitzinfo.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/trump_rudy_drag_1024x1024.jpg

How can we forget this creepy kiss?

[djohn2oo8]

What the fuck does that matter? Where was the girl in your avatar before she made the accusations? Where is she now? See how that makes no difference? See how you’re an idiot?
:lol

[Pavlov]

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Bush: Whatever you want.

Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.Sorry, that is inadmissible in the TSA beta cuck kangaroo message board court.

[TSA]

Or got turned down a lot.

Or didn't and has been with beautiful women his entire life.

[Pavlov]

What the fuck does that matter? Where was the girl in your avatar before she made the accusations? Where is she now? See how that makes no difference? See how you’re an idiot?I get the feeling TSA will hit every sexual harassment/assault defense before this is over.

Should we count different types of victim blaming?

[Pavlov]

Or didn't and has been with beautiful women his entire life.You'll defend your record with women in third person but won't even hypothetically defend your wife. :lol

[TSA]

The Russian collusion story is falling apart day by day and democrats know this so they've moved on to their next attempt to take down Trump which will inevitably fail.

[djohn2oo8]

You'll defend your record with women in third person but won't even hypothetically defend your wife. :lol
:lmao

[Pavlov]

The Russian collusion story*ding*

[djohn2oo8]

The Russian collusion story is falling apart day by day and democrats know this so they've moved on to their next attempt to take down Trump which will inevitably fail.
Should sexual assault allegations be taken seriously against Republicans?

[RandomGuy]

that's creepy?


Eight former crew members recalled that he repeatedly made lewd comments about a camerawoman he said had a nice rear, comparing her beauty to that of his daughter, Ivanka.

[...]

[Camera assistant Rebecca Arndt] said that Trump would publicly discuss the woman’s beauty and how her blue eyes and blonde hair compared to his daughter Ivanka’s looks.

“He would just mention it all the time. I remember him comparing Ivanka to her and saying that only Ivanka was prettier,” she said.

[boutons_deux]

No. But then I have been happily married for 20+ years, so my experience is somewhat skewed.

Trump on the other hand has a 40 year history of creepy shit.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/galleries/x701/181683.jpg

Trash started a Model Agency when he was nearly 45 to get his creep on with young models like this one.

And Melania was a soft core porn model, which is probably how he met her.

Evangelical Bible-humpers love Trash because God lifted him up, like a model's skirt, to do God's work.

[RandomGuy]

The Russian collusion story is falling apart day by day and democrats know this so they've moved on to their next attempt to take down Trump which will inevitably fail.


On his “hot” 16-year-old daughter.

In 1997, Donald recruited his then 16-year-old daughter Ivanka to help host the Miss Teen USA pageant. And Donald could not have been more proud.

From The New York Times:

He turned to Brook Antoinette Mahealani Lee, Miss Universe at the time, and asked for her opinion of his daughter’s body.

‘Don’t you think my daughter’s hot? She’s hot, right?’ ” Ms. Lee recalled him saying. ‘I was like, ‘Really?’ That’s just weird. She was 16. That’s creepy.”

[Pavlov]

Should sexual assault allegations be taken seriously against Republicans?You must first answer his questions three!

[djohn2oo8]

The Russian collusion story is falling apart day by day and democrats know this so they've moved on to their next attempt to take down Trump which will inevitably fail.
Just grab em by the pussy

[TSA]

You'll defend your record with women in third person but won't even hypothetically defend your wife. :lol

:lol hypothetically defending anything

[RandomGuy]

On (where else but) Howard Stern’s show in 2003, Trump offered some insight into the bizarre power dynamic behind his attraction to his then-21-year-old daughter:

You know who is one of the great beauties of the world, and I helped create her? Ivanka. My daughter, Ivanka. She’s six feet tall. She’s got the best body. She made a lot of money as a model—a tremendous amount. And then she went cold turkey and gave it all up, because she had to go to college. Because I wanted her to go to college. She goes to the best college.

[RandomGuy]

:lol hypothetically defending anything


During a gala celebration after 1997's Miss Universe pageant, Donald Trump cornered the then 21-year-old Temple Taggart (that year’s Miss Utah) to tell her “how much he liked her style” and invite her “to visit him in New York to talk about her future.”

The New York Times reported:

Soon enough, she said, he delivered another unwelcome kiss on her lips, this time in Trump Tower. After boasting of his connections to elite modeling agencies, he advised her to lie about her age to get ahead in the industry, she said.

“‘We’re going to have to tell them you’re 17,’” Ms. Taggart recalled him telling her, “because in his mind, 21 is too old. I was like, ‘No, we’re not going to do that.’”

[Pavlov]

:lol hypothetically defending anythingYeah -- I'm not saying you'd actually defend your wife against sexual harassment -- you seem like you'd offer her up to Trump -- but you wouldn't even say you'd defend her.

That's just weird, dude.

[RandomGuy]

On hot 12-year-olds.

Later, in 2003, Trump told Stern:

Now, somebody who a lot of people don’t give credit to but is in actuality very beautiful is Paris Hilton. I’ve known Paris Hilton from the time she’s 12, her parents are friends of mine, and the first time I saw her she walked into the room and I said, ‘Who the hell is that?’ At 12, I wasn’t interested… but she was beautiful.
According to The Daily Beast, Trump “also admitted to watching Paris Hilton’s sex tape with Knauss, despite knowing her since the age of 12 and being very close friends with the Hilton Family.”

[RandomGuy]

Yeah -- I'm not saying you'd actually defend your wife against sexual harassment -- you seem like you'd offer her up to Trump -- but you wouldn't even say you'd defend her.

That's just weird, dude.

That's a good point. He is so shy about saying anything definitive that he can't even do that one simple thing. Says a lot, IMO.

[boutons_deux]

Temple Taggart

https://boardgamegeek.com/camo/45ca872d7403903bf6f9e1fb97948f77f30c9b79/687474703a2f2f617263686976652e736c747269622e636f6d 2f696d616765732f323030362f303731362f686f6d5f686774 765f303731377e312e6a7067

[RandomGuy]

Who can forget the creepy fucking first cabinet meeting? (barfs a little)


But if you watch the C-SPAN video from the cabinet room, note that after the president’s odd praise for himself, Trump went around the room, offering each member of his cabinet an opportunity to talk about how much they like him and are proud to serve in his administration. With few exceptions, that’s precisely what they did.

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, whose job is reportedly in jeopardy, went so far as to declare, with arms raised, “We thank you for the opportunity and blessing to serve your agenda.”

As cabinet members went around the room, singing the president’s praises, Trump simply nodded in agreement, basking in his underlings’ adulation.

Cabinet meetings have been periodically televised since Eisenhower, but no one has ever seen one quite as creepy as Trump’s display this morning.


CNBC’s John Harwood‏, apparently flabbergasted, said via Twitter, “Honestly this is like a scene from the Third World.”

The New York Times’ Glenn Thrush described it “one of the most exquisitely awkward public events I’ve ever seen.”

[djohn2oo8]

Yeah -- I'm not saying you'd actually defend your wife against sexual harassment -- you seem like you'd offer her up to Trump -- but you wouldn't even say you'd defend her.

That's just weird, dude.
lol

[boutons_deux]

The accusers

https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/K72snjS.Yjg5lwPwOEN3ng--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9NzQ0O2g9NDUw/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/9aabb5480ef86022b39a067d953709db

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-accusers-sexual-assault-153559631.html

[RandomGuy]

Women are coming forward to accuse Donald Trump of sexual assaulting them in the ways he himself described in a leaked 2005 tape: “Just kiss. I don’t even wait. When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy.”

But as those allegations were first surfacing, another disturbing old recording came out — and this one featured Trump objectifying a young girl.

In the 1992 recording, a 46-year-old Trump asks a little girl if she’s going to go up an escalator. Then Trump turns to the camera and says, “I am going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?”

[RandomGuy]

The Los Angeles Times unearthed this wire brief from the Chicago Tribune in December 1992, the same year the escalator video was taken.

After watching a youth choir sing carols, Trump asked two of the girls how old they were. When they said they were 14, Trump, who again was 46 at the time, said, “Wow! Just think — in a couple of years, I'll be dating you.”


Both of the above incidents, and many of the ones below, could be dismissed as jokes. But they’re incredibly creepy and inappropriate. And arguably a lot worse than that.

“I hate to even use the word ‘inappropriate,’” Bostick said. “It’s dangerous. Because even if he's not acting on it, there are people who act on those types of thoughts, and he's making that seem normal.”

[RandomGuy]

Four women who have previously accused President Donald Trump of sexual misconduct before he took office called on Congress to investigate the allegations as America's watershed #MeToo moment continues to unfold.

Jessica Leeds, Samantha Holvey and Rachel Crooks, appearing together on "Megyn Kelly Today" on Monday, described separate interactions with the president in years past, with one of the allegations dating back several decades. Lisa Boyne, who also came forward last year, joined the others via phone for a news conference hours later.

Holvey said when she competed in Trump’s Miss USA pageant in 2006, Trump came backstage unexpectedly when she and other contestants were wearing nothing but robes and he personally inspected the contestants.

“I just felt so gross,” she said. "Just looking me over like I was a piece of meat.”

[RandomGuy]

The creepy shit goes on, and on.

I need a shower.

[Pavlov]

That's a good point. He is so shy about saying anything definitive that he can't even do that one simple thing. Says a lot, IMO.Well, he's trying to shut down any discussion about Trump when there are real accusers with real accusations on the record while still trying to push the Democrat Haitian child sex-slaves-okay-maybe-not-sex-slaves-but-it-still-counts-as-child-sex-slaves smuggling narrative in the same forum.

It's insane -- but there's no reason for these women to go away now.

Sorry, TSA.

[RandomGuy]

Well, he's trying to shut down any discussion about Trump when there are real accusers with real accusations on the record while still trying to push the Democrat Haitian child sex-slaves-okay-maybe-not-sex-slaves-but-it-still-counts-as-child-sex-slaves smuggling narrative in the same forum.

It's insane -- but there's no reason for these women to go away now.

Sorry, TSA.

I'm just puzzled by what drives him to do this stuff. He can't possibly think Trump is not a creep. He must know he is. He can't possibly think Trump is a good president. He must know how shitty he is.

Why work so hard for the whataboutisms? What drives him to work so hard at conspiracy theories.

[TSA]

Yeah -- I'm not saying you'd actually defend your wife against sexual harassment -- you seem like you'd offer her up to Trump -- but you wouldn't even say you'd defend her.

That's just weird, dude.

There was nothing to defend in your stupid hypothetical. If my wife was in a hypothetical elevator after having lunch with someone and he leaned in for a kiss how am I supposed to hypothetically defend her? Hypothetically I could teleport and make myself magically appear in the elevator and tell the guy to back off. Your hypotheticals are pathetic.

[TSA]

That's a good point. He is so shy about saying anything definitive that he can't even do that one simple thing. Says a lot, IMO.

If your wife was in an elevator and another man leaned in to kiss her how would you defend her? Remember, you aren't in the elevator at the time.

[Pavlov]

There was nothing to defend in your stupid hypothetical. If my wife was in a hypothetical elevator after having lunch with someone and he leaned in for a kiss how am I supposed to hypothetically defend her? Hypothetically I could teleport and make myself magically appear in the elevator and tell the guy to back off. Your hypotheticals are pathetic.So you can't make the leap in your imagination that your wife would tell you about it?

OK. Doesn't seem like you would do anything after that either.

Your entire mindset is beta cuck.

[Pavlov]

I'm just puzzled by what drives him to do this stuff. He can't possibly think Trump is not a creep. He must know he is. He can't possibly think Trump is a good president. He must know how shitty he is.

Why work so hard for the whataboutisms? What drives him to work so hard at conspiracy theories.He's still pushing the Satan worshiping angle in the Q thread.

Just weird.

[vy65]

Your argument is if they don't deny you then they must have wanted it. Which is not always true.

That is a comical standard.

[TSA]

So you can't make the leap in your imagination that your wife would tell you about it?

OK. Doesn't seem like you would do anything after that either.

Your entire mindset is beta cuck.

Look how pathetic your hypotheticals are when you keep trying to play them out further.

:cry what would you do about the hypothetical attempted kiss you that happened in an elevator when you weren't present :cry

[Pavlov]

Look how pathetic your hypotheticals are when you keep trying to play them out further.

:cry what would you do about the hypothetical attempted kiss you that happened in an elevator when you weren't present :cryYour answer is obviously "nothing."

No big deal. It makes perfect sense.

[Pavlov]

I'm sorry, that was unfair of me -- you would do more than nothing.

You would log in to defend the man who harassed your wife on the internet.

[RandomGuy]

If your wife was in an elevator and another man leaned in to kiss her how would you defend her? Remember, you aren't in the elevator at the time.


Depends on the overall context. If it was unwanted and prurient, then yes. If it was some doddering old man giving her a peck on the cheek, no.

[TSA]

Depends on the overall context. If it was unwanted and prurient, then yes. If it was some doddering old man giving her a peck on the cheek, no.

She said she wasn't threatened or offended. Hypothetically the man didn't know she was married. What do you do now to "defend" her?

[TSA]

Your answer is obviously "nothing."

No big deal. It makes perfect sense.

What would you do in the same situation Chump? Be specific.

[Pavlov]

She said she wasn't threatened or offended. Hypothetically the man didn't know she was married. What do you do now to "defend" her?


Look how pathetic your hypotheticals are when you keep trying to play them out further.:lmao

[TSA]

:lmao

I'm glad you finally realize how pathetic you look with your hypothetical questions.

[Pavlov]

What would you do in the same situation Chump? Be specific.Wait, are we playing the questions three game again?

In that case, I'm still waiting for your answer.

Be specific.

[Pavlov]

I'm glad you finally realize how pathetic you look with your hypothetical questions.But you look good with yours?

Be specific.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA cant even say if he would defend his wife. Lordy!

[boutons_deux]

http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.newsweek.com/files/styles/lg/public/2016/10/27/1028trumpgrope01.JPG

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-groping-women-criminal-offense-514153

[pgardn]

Sorry but there is nothing creepy about Trump going in for a kiss. The woman wasn't threatened nor offended. It's a non-story.

Sorry, but I disagree.

Do you sucker kiss women you find attractive?

[djohn2oo8]

940306449623863302
Hell of a response there. :lmao

[Reck]

5 Pages of TSA semen shielding and becoming a willing cuck for Trump. :lol

Even Chris is like :claw.

[TSA]

Sorry, but I disagree.

Do you sucker kiss women you find attractive?

If by sucker kiss you mean attempt a kiss without first asking permission yes, I “sucker” kiss women I find attractive. Sucker kissed a woman 6 years ago I found attractive and am now happily married to her.

[boutons_deux]

940306449623863302
Hell of a response there. :lmao

At least Trash said Moore denied his pedophilia and that's enough for Trash.

But SHS won't say she believes Trash's denials?

[Brazil]

If by sucker kiss you mean attempt a kiss without first asking permission yes, I “sucker” kiss women I find attractive. Sucker kissed a woman 6 years ago I found attractive and am now happily married to her.

not technically touching.... I guess it is a bad thing only when it is not Trump because:

"Samantha Holvey, the former Miss North Carolina 2006 who has accused Trump of inspecting beauty pageant contestants, and Jessica Leeds, who has accused the President of grabbing her chest and attempting to move his hand up her skirt on a flight, also sat with Crooks at Monday's event."

Trump apparently also grabbed some chest tbh...

[Brazil]

:lol also

Mindy McGillivray, who accused Trump of grabbing her butt at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida in 2003 and Natasha Stoynoff, who accused Trump of "forcing his tongue" down her throat during a photo shoot at Mar-a-Lago in 2005.

TSA come here and spin dat shit if you can :lmao

[Brazil]

Dodge #1

Have you ever gone in for a kiss and been denied by a man/woman?

happened to me but I've never forced my tongue inside tbh... dat Trump is a creepy gross molester tbh

[Brazil]

"I just watched Sen. Al Franken do the honorable thing and resign from his office," Booker said. "My question is, why isn't Donald Trump doing the same thing -- who has more serious allegations against him, with more women who have come forward. The fact pattern on him is far more damning than the fact pattern on Al Franken."

[DMC]

Did he put a cigar up her twat while he was married?

No?

Probably won't be re-elected then.

[Chucho]

that's creepy?

Only if you're queer. That broad is smokin, tbh.

[RandomGuy]

He's still pushing the Satan worshiping angle in the Q thread.

Just weird.

Religion has to figure into it somehow. It takes a certain mindset to maintain some religious delusions. My guess is the human being on the other side of that profile believes some pretty bizarre shit, akin to flat earth or magic oils.

The woo is strong with this one.

[RandomGuy]

I get the feeling TSA will hit every sexual harassment/assault defense before this is over.

Should we count different types of victim blaming?

Make it into a kind of bingo?

[spurraider21]

Did he put a cigar up her twat while he was married?

No?

Probably won't be re-elected then.
*ding*

[djohn2oo8]

Only if you're queer. That broad is smokin, tbh.

Yeah, because then after that you can just grab em by the pussy.

[DMC]

Yeah, because then after that you can just grab em by the pussy.

When you have Trump money you can always grab'em by the pussy. That's why even Harvey made it so long without getting ratted out, he was paying out so all the good little Hollywhores wanted some of that. Once they got out of the inner circle they started crying foul.

:cry 20 years ago Donald grabbed my pussy, and after I blew him I felt so violated...

[djohn2oo8]

When you have Trump money you can always grab'em by the pussy. That's why even Harvey made it so long without getting ratted out, he was paying out so all the good little Hollywhores wanted some of that. Once they got out of the inner circle they started crying foul.

:cry 20 years ago Donald grabbed my pussy, and after I blew him I felt so violated...
Can't get away with it anymore.

[Chucho]

Yeah, because then after that you can just grab em by the pussy.


Or grope them and make mockery pics while they're passed out.

[DMC]

Or grope them and make mockery pics while they're passed out.

Or hire them and fuck them in your office with a cigar

[DMC]

Can't get away with it anymore.

Of course, he's old and fat now and there are other financial needs that these hoes need to address.

[Chucho]

Or hire them and fuck them in your office with a cigar


You can't get away with it anymore when you're on the other side of the fence.

[Pavlov]

Of course, he's old and fat now and there are other financial needs that these hoes need to address.And what about Trump's accusers?

All lying whores?

[djohn2oo8]

Or grope them and make mockery pics while they're passed out.

Grabbing them by the pussy is not partisan. Neither is taking pictures and groping etc. Only a cumrag like you would get triggered like that.

[Chucho]

Grabbing them by the pussy is not partisan. Neither is taking pictures and groping etc. Only a cumrag like you would get triggered like that.


LOL, you do realize you responded with a triggered comment first, Boxscore? You really are Leftist Chris.

[RandomGuy]

When you have Trump money you can always grab'em by the pussy. That's why even Harvey made it so long without getting ratted out, he was paying out so all the good little Hollywhores wanted some of that. Once they got out of the inner circle they started crying foul.

:cry 20 years ago Donald grabbed my pussy, and after I blew him I felt so violated...

Actions count louder than words, right sporto? What does serial sexual assault say about a man?

[DMC]

Actions count louder than words, right sporto? What does serial sexual assault say about a man?

Which man sexually assaulted you?

[RandomGuy]

[whataboutism]

Not really what the thread is about.

Do you care about Trumps actions or not?

[djohn2oo8]

LOL, you do realize you responded with a triggered comment first, Boxscore? You really are Leftist Chris.

Are you cool with sexual assault?

[RandomGuy]

[redirect]

Not really an answer to the question as to what serial sexual assault says about a man.

Its almost as if you think it's ok.

[Chucho]

Are you cool with sexual assault?


LOL, the trigger runs deep with Boxscore. :lmao

[RandomGuy]

She said she wasn't threatened or offended. Hypothetically the man didn't know she was married. What do you do now to "defend" her?

Again, depends on the intent. Mens resa.

[RandomGuy]

Are you cool with sexual assault?


LOL, the trigger runs deep with Boxscore. :lmao

It is a fair question, and on point for the thread. Just sayin. Shouldn't be a hard one to answer.

I'll go first: No.

[Chucho]

It is a fair question, and on point for the thread. Just sayin. Shouldn't be a hard one to answer.

I'll go first: No.


Nope, not one bit.

Dunno why Boxscore is tryin to appropriate Pav's gimmick tho. It's thread-pertinent, but not to our specific dialogue.

[Pavlov]

It is a fair question, and on point for the thread. Just sayin. Shouldn't be a hard one to answer.

I'll go first: No.:lol It's come to the point where we actually have to ask.

For the record, my answer is also no.

[DMC]

And what about Trump's accusers?

All lying whores?
Did I say "lying"?

Shove your narrative up your lily white ass.

[DMC]

Not really an answer to the question as to what serial sexual assault says about a man.

Its almost as if you think it's ok.

It's called begging the question and it's the tactic you plebes use most when you have a narrative to push. You haven't proven sexual assault. You called Roy Moore a pedo because he touched a 14 year old when pedo is defined clearly as desiring sex with prepubescent children.

If any of you ever offers an honest retort you'll get an honest response. You won't because you hold shit for cards so you talk a game and bluff and eventually always fold.

[boutons_deux]

Why women, esp poor women, don't report sexual abuse

Woman says high-ranking Kansas official offered her job for sex, harassed her with pornographic texts

“The messages were graphic and sexual in nature, ranging from words to pictures to videos,”

Haehn was disciplined by the agency for conduct involving Gill. Haehn was suspended for a period of weeks, but allowed to return to his previous role as a KDADS commissioner reporting to the Cabinet secretary.

Haehn, who was essentially a deputy secretary at KDADS, remained at the agency until resigning in June to take a job at Amerigroup Kansas.

She hesitated to involve her employer and state officials in the matter because of apprehension that a personnel conflict with a prominent KDADS commissioner might damage her career or the interests of her employer, Topeka-based disability services company Equi-Venture Farms.

She said her worst fears about standing up to Haehn’s behavior were realized during the past year.

She was fired from her Equi-Venture job after reporting the harassment.

She was undercut by a non-compete clause in a contract barring her from Kansas jobs in her field, despite 20 years of experience.

She returned home to Tennessee after losing her house, and

her family continues to suffer financially and emotionally.

http://cjonline.com/news/state-government/local/2017-12-02/woman-says-high-ranking-kansas-official-offered-her-job-sex

[Spurminator]

Conservatives have been reduced to arguing semantics around the appropriate characterization of 30 year olds stalking teenagers at the mall to justify the election of a racist fossil to the US Senate.

[Pavlov]

Did I say "lying"?

Shove your narrative up your lily white ass.It was a question.

Do you think they are all lying whores?

Yes or no.

Don't be a pussy. Just answer.

[Spurtacular]

Snowflakes are gonna post like wishes for 100 plus pages here. Book it.

[DarrinS]

940254360847704066

What’s is Brave New Films?

[spurraider21]

What’s is Brave New Films?
That’s the takeaway

[RandomGuy]

Not really an answer to the question as to what serial sexual assault says about a man.

Its almost as if you think it's ok.



It's called begging the question and it's the tactic you plebes use most when you have a narrative to push. You haven't proven sexual assault. You called Roy Moore a pedo because he touched a 14 year old when pedo is defined clearly as desiring sex with prepubescent children.

If any of you ever offers an honest retort you'll get an honest response. You won't because you hold shit for cards so you talk a game and bluff and eventually always fold.

There is a difference between attempting to infer something based on statements, and begging the question. If you like, I can take the action of explaining how they are different.

I was merely trying to get a baseline of discussion, but whatever is up your butt seems to be distracting you.

I don't think you are capable of an honest discussion, because you seem vastly more concerned with personal attacks than actually getting anywhere.

Your continued failure to say anything meaningful is all on you, so please stop blaming me for your failures. You could choose to move beyond them at any time. Yet you choose not to.

[Reck]

What’s is Brave New Films?

Are you ADD?

You would have to be for this to be your main takeaway. Who wonders off like that?

The background is what you remember most about this. :lmao

[pgardn]

If by sucker kiss you mean attempt a kiss without first asking permission yes, I “sucker” kiss women I find attractive. Sucker kissed a woman 6 years ago I found attractive and am now happily married to her.

Same situation as Trump. Not looking like a sucker punch.
Thats the debate.

Your old, she's much younger and clearly at a lower level on the business scale.

Maybe this is just an upbringing thing. Cept I've been married longer. I kissed a girl looking at her lips parted a bit, and then got a half a response. She then said, I have a boyfriend. After asking me to the movies... ? That was it, done, finito. Maybe it's just personality. I'm done, embarrassed, and apologizing after that type of peck response. I'm hoping never to run in to her. I usually had to have huge hints. Like being kissed first. Or asked, please kiss me and more. Rejection is a huge turnoff. If the other person is not liking any bit of what's going on, its so done. I'm stopping. Without being told. Only a what's wrong keep going is gonna change that. I was under the wacky assumption consensual meant both parties wanted "in". I needed, extensive permission. This IS considered alpha in my upbringing. The women has much more to consider and must be much more careful. I was taught about the 9 months that I did not have to carry, so don't Carryon. There is no white knight, just straight reason concerning consequences. I have sisters, so my dad was very clear with them as well.

So yeah, it's a huge no. Glad it worked out for you. Weird you had no hints and it all worked out. Good deal.

[TSA]

What’s is Brave New Films?

A film production company funded by George Soros' Open Society and partnered with Media Matters.

[Spurtacular]

Snowflakes are gonna post like wishes for 100 plus pages here. Book it.

500 plus if this becomes the snowflakes' new nothing burger Russia story.

[DarrinS]

A film production company funded by George Soros' Open Society and partnered with Media Matters.

Figures

[TSA]

Same situation as Trump. Not looking like a sucker punch.
Thats the debate.

Your old, she's much younger and clearly at a lower level on the business scale.

Maybe this is just an upbringing thing. Cept I've been married longer. I kissed a girl looking at her lips parted a bit, and then got a half a response. She then said, I have a boyfriend. After asking me to the movies... ? That was it, done, finito. Maybe it's just personality. I'm done, embarrassed, and apologizing after that type of peck response. I'm hoping never to run in to her. I usually had to have huge hints. Like being kissed first. Or asked, please kiss me and more. Rejection is a huge turnoff. If the other person is not liking any bit of what's going on, its so done. I'm stopping. Without being told. Only a what's wrong keep going is gonna change that. I was under the wacky assumption consensual meant both parties wanted "in". I needed, extensive permission. This IS considered alpha in my upbringing. The women has much more to consider and must be much more careful. I was taught about the 9 months that I did not have to carry, so don't Carryon. There is no white knight, just straight reason concerning consequences. I have sisters, so my dad was very clear with them as well.

So yeah, it's a huge no. Glad it worked out for you. Weird you had no hints and it all worked out. Good deal.

I was very good at picking up on subtle hints but had no problem being rejected if I read them wrong and was denied.

[pgardn]

500 plus if this becomes the snowflakes' new nothing burger Russia story.

So it will reach and disturb the trembling millions like pizzagate.

[Spurtacular]

So it will reach and disturb the trembling millions like pizzagate.

I honestly don't know what point you're trying to make; but good luck with that.

[pgardn]

I honestly don't know what point you're trying to make; but good luck with that.

Simplified:
This thread will have as many liberal snowflakes flocking to it as the trembling conservatives lemminged to pizzagate.

[DMC]

There is a difference between attempting to infer something based on statements, and begging the question. If you like, I can take the action of explaining how they are different.

I was merely trying to get a baseline of discussion, but whatever is up your butt seems to be distracting you.

I don't think you are capable of an honest discussion, because you seem vastly more concerned with personal attacks than actually getting anywhere.

Your continued failure to say anything meaningful is all on you, so please stop blaming me for your failures. You could choose to move beyond them at any time. Yet you choose not to.

Go ahead and explain the difference between begging the question and the question you asked me about approving sexual assault.

[Reck]

940370640019869697

RIP Nikki Haley or is this fake news? :lol

[DMC]

940370640019869697

RIP Nikki Haley or is this fake news? :lol

https://www.fairfaxstatic.com.au/content/dam/images/g/i/r/t/4/u/image.related.articleLeadwide.620x349.grtir6.png/1475664270357.jpg

Isn't one of these your tweeter?

Now wonder you follow so closely.

[Reck]

https://www.fairfaxstatic.com.au/content/dam/images/g/i/r/t/4/u/image.related.articleLeadwide.620x349.grtir6.png/1475664270357.jpg

Isn't one of these your tweeter?

Now wonder you follow so closely.

Is that your subtle way of coming Out?

Good luck in your endeavors. Fag

[Spurminator]

What’s is Brave New Films?


A film production company funded by George Soros' Open Society and partnered with Media Matters.


Figures

:lol

Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."

BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.

TSA's answer, like the DailyWire (https://www.dailywire.com/news/24524/george-soros-funded-group-gathering-trumps-ryan-saavedra) article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.

[Reck]

:lol

Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."

BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.

TSA's answer, like the DailyWire (https://www.dailywire.com/news/24524/george-soros-funded-group-gathering-trumps-ryan-saavedra) article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.

Are you surprised?

These are the same people who get their "facts" off of memes and take it as gospel news.

They dont challenge each other on the validity of the source. They take each other words over it.

[boutons_deux]

Trump furious with Nikki Haley after she says his assault accusers ‘should be heard’

House, President Donald Trump did not react well to news that U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley stood up for sexual assault victims during an interview on CBS on Sunday.

The Associated Press (https://apnews.com/e3b50b28fa73426799e6ac63839057fb) reports that “Haley’s comments infuriated the president,

Haley commended the women who have come forward as part of the #MeToo movement, saying, “I’m proud of their strength. I’m proud of their courage.”

“They should be heard, and they should be dealt with. And I think we heard from them before the election. And I think any woman who has felt violated or felt mistreated in any way, they have every right to speak up.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/trump-furious-with-nikki-haley-after-she-says-his-assault-accusers-should-be-heard-report/

[boutons_deux]

The White House’s audacious new lie about the women accusing the president of sexual abuse

There is only one "eyewitness," and his story is a sham.

, the White House claims that the accusations were contradicted “in most cases” by eyewitnesses:


These false claims, totally disputed in most cases by eyewitness accounts, were addressed at length during last year’s campaign, and the American people voiced their judgment by delivering a decisive victory.

The timing and absurdity of these false claims speaks volumes, and the publicity tour that has begun only further confirms the political motives behind them.


This is a lie.


Only one “eyewitness” has ever emerged to dispute a claim of sexual assault against Trump. That man, Anthony Gilberthorpe, is a serial fableist with a history of pushing false stories for a few minutes of attention.


Gilberthorpe claims that he was in the first-class cabin with Trump and Jessica Leeds during a cross-country flight in 1980. Gilberthorpe presented no actual evidence that he was on the flight, “just his self-described excellent memory. (https://nypost.com/2016/10/14/trump-camp-puts-forward-witness-to-refute-sex-assault-claim/)”

He also did not explain why he might have been on a first-class domestic flight in the U.S. as an 18-year-old British boy. He also did not explain why, if he had been on such a flight, he would remember an interaction between Trump and Leeds in which “nothing inappropriate” occurred.

He also claims that Leeds, who was in her 30s at the time, confided in him during the flight that she wanted to marry Trump.

Trump’s eagerness to rely on such an unreliable account suggests he has little information that contradict the allegations against him.

During the campaign, Trump and Mike Pence promised information that would prove all the allegations against Trump are “all categorically false (https://thinkprogress.org/trump-secret-evidence-sexual-assault-9a5edea8094d#.6yswinfu0).”

They later confirmed that they were alluding to Gilberthorpe’s story.

https://thinkprogress.org/the-white-houses-audacious-new-lie-about-the-women-accusing-the-president-of-sexual-abuse-fe7187f24282/

[DMC]

Are you surprised?

These are the same people who get their "facts" off of memes and take it as gospel news.

They dont challenge each other on the validity of the source. They take each other words over it.

Meanwhile your facts are taken from knee-jerk articles from desperate journalists who ignore simple things like dates.

[DarrinS]

:lol

Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."

BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.

TSA's answer, like the DailyWire (https://www.dailywire.com/news/24524/george-soros-funded-group-gathering-trumps-ryan-saavedra) article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.



They seem like a really unbiased organization

https://www.bravenewfilms.org

[TSA]

:lol

Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."

BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.

TSA's answer, like the DailyWire (https://www.dailywire.com/news/24524/george-soros-funded-group-gathering-trumps-ryan-saavedra) article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.

I just went to their about page and looked up their donors and partners.

https://www.bravenewfilms.org/about

Who’s BNF’s largest donor?

[Spurtacular]

Simplified:
This thread will have as many liberal snowflakes flocking to it as the trembling conservatives lemminged to pizzagate.

Cept Pizzagate is not made up, and show me the 500 plus page Pizzagate thread if you want to make the equivalency all the same.

[Pavlov]

Cept Pizzagate is not made up, and show me the 500 plus page Pizzagate thread if you want to make the equivalency all the same.Eh, what's real about Pizzagate?

I will have to ask you to be specific, considering the thread.

[Spurminator]

They seem like a really unbiased organization

https://www.bravenewfilms.org

Who said anything about unbiased? Do you believe BNF's liberal bias means the women in this video are lying?

Do you believe BNF put them up to this?

(I bet you won't answer.)


I just went to their about page and looked up their donors and partners.

https://www.bravenewfilms.org/about

What a happy coincidence that you and DailyWire/Gateway Pundit looked at the BNF "About" page on the same exact day and used one of their funding partners as evidence against the accusers' credibility.


Who’s BNF’s largest donor?

I can't tell from the information I can find. Open Society appears to be one of five top donors contributing at least $200K of their total $2.5MM in 2016 revenue along with the Ford Foundation.

If you have better info, feel free to provide it. As it stands it seems like you could have just as easily said BNF is a Ford-funded media company.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

They seem like a really unbiased organization

https://www.bravenewfilms.org

:lol a Fox News watcher/Drudge Report reader complaining about bias

[RandomGuy]

Go ahead and explain the difference between begging the question and the question you asked me about approving sexual assault.

As you wish. First let's see if we can pin down "begging the question".

Begging the question is a circular argument that assumes the premise buried in the question itself to confirm the question.

Identify the premise in the question, and then try to state how it is circular:

"What does serial sexual assault say about a man?"




For reference:
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/53/Begging-the-Question
http://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/Begging-the-Question.html
http://www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/begging-the-question/

If you can't identify a circular argument, why do you think that is?

[djohn2oo8]

940585004853317632

[SpursforSix]

940585004853317632

Trumps a retard but where's the sexual harassment part?

[djohn2oo8]

Trumps a retard but where's the sexual harassment part?

she would do anything for campaign contributions. You see what that implies.

[SpursforSix]

she would do anything for campaign contributions. You see what that implies.

That's a big ass leap.

[djohn2oo8]

That's a big ass leap.

Anything actually includes alot. "She would do anything" generally means one thing.

[RandomGuy]

:lol

Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."

BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.

TSA's answer, like the DailyWire (https://www.dailywire.com/news/24524/george-soros-funded-group-gathering-trumps-ryan-saavedra) article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.

It shows a perfect example of how poor Darrins reasoning skills are. I have been talking to the human being on the other end of that for years about climage change. For years I have shown him how flawed his reasoning is, in terms of "ad hominem".

"it is wrong because of the source"

When I try to use very simple examples to coax him out of his Dunning-Kruger effect haze, he acts like he can't read.

Example:
"An umbrella salesman, says that it is forecast to rain today, so therefore it will not rain, because he has a motive to lie".

What the forecast says about the rain is a fact that exists outside of who claims it. What is actually important is the claim itself.

This has been explained to him repeatedly, yet he still thinks it works, as in this case.

It is fine to apply a bit of extra skepticism, where appropriate. But Darrin keeps running back to arguments like this, like a dog to vomit. It is sad to see someone so enslaved to bad thinking.

[SpursforSix]

Anything actually includes alot. "She would do anything" generally means one thing.

Uh...no it doesn't. It's a pretty a common phrase. And in most cases, normal people don't infer sex.

The fact that you think it implies sex makes you pretty creepy.

[djohn2oo8]

Uh...no it doesn't. It's a pretty a common phrase. And in most cases, normal people don't infer sex.

The fact that you think it implies sex makes you pretty creepy.

So most people go around saying "she would do anything" without anything being infered from that. Sure. Naive boy. :lol

[DMC]

As you wish. First let's see if we can pin down "begging the question".

Begging the question is a circular argument that assumes the premise buried in the question itself to confirm the question.

Identify the premise in the question, and then try to state how it is circular:

"What does serial sexual assault say about a man?"




For reference:
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/53/Begging-the-Question
http://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/Begging-the-Question.html
http://www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/begging-the-question/

If you can't identify a circular argument, why do you think that is?

You have to know the context in which the question is asked.

1. You claim person X sexually assaulted person Y because person Y said so.
2. I challenge the veracity of the claim of Person Y
3. You ask what sexual assault says about person X

Your question infers person X sexually assaulted someone. Since we haven't established sexual assault happened, the question about what it means about a person is either A) moot or B) begging the question

I gave you benefit of the doubt that you wouldn't ask a moot question. Ergo you are begging the question. If you'd like to change that to "moot", that's ok.

[SpursforSix]

So most people go around saying "she would do anything" without anything being infered from that. Sure. Naive boy. :lol

So when you're talking to someone and they say, "I'd do anything to have a day off on Monday", you infer that they are willing to have sex?

That's fucked up.

[djohn2oo8]

So when you're talking to someone and they say, "I'd do anything to have a day off on Monday", you infer that they are willing to have sex?

That's fucked up.

The phrase clearly says "she would do anything". As in, talking about someone else. You know damn well that is not the same context. "I would do anything for a day off" and "she would do anything for campaign contributions" are not even the same context and you damn well know it

[SpursforSix]

The phrase clearly says "she would do anything". As in, talking about someone else. You know damn well that is not the same context. "I would do anything for a day off" and "she would do anything for campaign contributions" are not even the same context and you damn well know it

So is it the "she" that causes you to infer that it means sex? What if it was a guy and Trump said that? What would you take that to mean? Be honest.

As retarded as Trump is, he's not going to say something like that and mean it like you're taking it.

So many idiots on the left and right that have to try to jump on anything that can further their cause.

[djohn2oo8]

So is it the "she" that causes you to infer that it means sex? What if it was a guy and Trump said that? What would you take that to mean? Be honest.

As retarded as Trump is, he's not going to say something like that and mean it like you're taking it.

So many idiots on the left and right that have to try to jump on anything that can further their cause.

She would do anything for money that was the context. What is that supposed to mean? And Trump never goes after men that way.

[SpursforSix]

She would do anything for money that was the context. What is that supposed to mean? And Trump never goes after men that way.

You're truly retarded. I doubt any rational Democrats are going to grab hold of this bullshit.

You're as bad as the people that overlook Moore being a pedo.

[djohn2oo8]

You're truly retarded. I doubt any rational Democrats are going to grab hold of this bullshit.

You're as bad as the people that overlook Moore being a pedo.
You didn't answer the question. what does that statement mean

[RandomGuy]

940585004853317632

Saw that.

What a fucking idiot.

She got pulled out of a bible study group to be told that the President was rage-tweeting at her.

[RandomGuy]

So is it the "she" that causes you to infer that it means sex? What if it was a guy and Trump said that? What would you take that to mean? Be honest.

As retarded as Trump is, he's not going to say something like that and mean it like you're taking it.

So many idiots on the left and right that have to try to jump on anything that can further their cause.

Dude, the implication "she will do anything" is pretty clear to anyone.

If you think he wasn't trying for that, you should really, really, look at some of the other gross shit that Trump had said.

As dumb as this fucker is, he meant it exactly that way.

[RandomGuy]

Uh...no it doesn't. It's a pretty a common phrase. And in most cases, normal people don't infer sex.

The fact that you think it implies sex makes you pretty creepy.

When you were in my office, you said you would do anything for a raise. I will take you up on that.

[RandomGuy]

"It is tempting to split today’s Republican Party into factions, to see Trump as a bizarre aberration, to see his voters as alienated and marginal, to see Roy Moore as an inexplicably Alabaman phenomenon, and to frame establishment Republicans as fundamentally normal politicians suffering through an abnormal moment. This is wrong.
Trump could flourish in the Republican Party precisely because “normal” Republicans like McConnell and Ryan spent years dismissing the facts they didn’t like, undermining the institutions and information sources that contradicted them, indulging the conspiracies and falsehoods they found convenient." —Ezra Klein

[SpursforSix]

You didn't answer the question. what does that statement mean

you're asking me what the phrase "she would do anything" means?

In the political context, I would think that it means doing unscrupulous things like lying. I wouldn't jump straight to assuming it means sex.

God damn, you must be hard to deal with in real life. Do you take every exaggeration, metaphor, and hyperbole literally?

[SpursforSix]

Dude, the implication "she will do anything" is pretty clear to anyone.

If you think he wasn't trying for that, you should really, really, look at some of the other gross shit that Trump had said.

As dumb as this fucker is, he meant it exactly that way.

I'm surprised you're in on this too. As dumb as he is, he's not dumb enough to say that and mean it that way. I'll say he was dumb to say that and not realize that a bunch of other dumb people are going to infer that he meant she'd fuck for campaign contributions.

[vy65]

940585004853317632

Tweets are sexual harassment now?

[RandomGuy]

Tweets are sexual harassment now?

When you were in my office, you begged me for money, and said you would do anything. I will take you up on that.

[vy65]

When you were in my office, you begged me for money, and said you would do anything. I will take you up on that.

huh?

[RandomGuy]

I'm surprised you're in on this too. As dumb as he is, he's not dumb enough to say that and mean it that way. I'll say he was dumb to say that and not realize that a bunch of other dumb people are going to infer that he meant she'd fuck for campaign contributions.

He is not dumb in that way. Again, look at his past piggish statements. I can provide a few dozen of them. I think he meant it exactly that way, and the pattern of piggishness backs that up.
.

[RandomGuy]

huh?

Did you read what he wrote?

[djohn2oo8]

you're asking me what the phrase "she would do anything" means?

In the political context, I would think that it means doing unscrupulous things like lying. I wouldn't jump straight to assuming it means sex.

God damn, you must be hard to deal with in real life. Do you take every exaggeration, metaphor, and hyperbole literally?

And I'm telling you in business, Managers, high power people that is how they talk. It's not right. It does happen. Now whether you choose to believe that or not I don't care.

[vy65]

Did you read what he wrote?

You're talking about the tweet? Because there's nothing in there about "I will take you up on that."

And my point is that it's a fucking tweet.

[Spurminator]

2017, when we debated the specific meaning of a juvenile social media taunt by The President of the United States.

[SpursforSix]

And I'm telling you in business, Managers, high power people that is how they talk. It's not right. It does happen. Now whether you choose to believe that or not I don't care.

What the fuck. Now you're stereotyping managers and "high power people"????

That's not how most of them talk or think.

I agree that some do and that it's not right. But it's not as common as you seem to think.

[vy65]

2017, when we debated the specific meaning of a juvenile social media taunt by The President of the United States.

This is the best post on the subject. Crying about :cry harassment :cry when the better criticism is that POTUS is tweeting lame troll attempts at other senators. The tweet is pathetic; but thinking its sexual harassment is snowflake mentality to a T.

[SpursforSix]

This is the best post on the subject. Crying about :cry harassment :cry when the better criticism is that POTUS is tweeting lame troll attempts at other senators. The tweet is pathetic; but thinking its sexual harassment is snowflake mentality to a T.

Huge double standard.

Several times a week, I'll be buying a drink at a convenience store and the woman behind the counter has the nerve to call me "hon" or "sweetie". Or follow me into the bathroom and stick her finger in my butt when I'm trying to pee.

[boutons_deux]

but thinking its sexual harassment

not harassment.

It's misogynist Trash slandering KG as a whore, right up there with MK "bleeding from wherever".

[RandomGuy]

You're talking about the tweet? Because there's nothing in there about "I will take you up on that."

And my point is that it's a fucking tweet.

The last bit was my embellishment to make a point.

It is a statement by the president of the united states. Does the medium mean the content is any different?