Grassley's Oversight Investigation into the political corruption of the FBI and DOJ

[TSA]

957835521794945024

[Pavlov]

Is this sundance?

[spurraider21]

he doesn't have a large blue circle. can't trust him

[monosylab1k]

Who doesn’t get their political news from TrumpSoldier?

[boutons_deux]

The ‘Law And Order’ Party Has Unleashed An Extraordinary Attack On Law Enforcement

Trump supporters working to undermine the Mueller investigation are saying things about the FBI you don’t typically hear from Republicans.

President Donald Trump (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/donald-trump) called himself the “law and order (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-law-and-order-candidate_us_5783e562e4b0344d51505dde)” candidate. :lol

Members of law enforcement, Trump said, were the “most mistreated people (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-police_us_569869d1e4b0b4eb759df9b8)” in America, and :lol

it was time to give them their power back. :lol

“We’re going to support you like you’ve never been supported before (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-police-brutality_us_597b840fe4b02a8434b6575a),” he said in a speech last year. :lol

“We love our police and law enforcement ― God Bless them all!” he tweeted (https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/947536951464333318?lang=en) last month. :lol

FBI agents aren’t feeling the love these days.

Call it the war on G-men.

As they’ve run interference for Trump by undermining the special counsel investigation being led by Robert Mueller,

some Republicans on Capitol Hill have unleashed broad attacks that suggest the nation’s premier law enforcement agency is tainted by corruption and malfeasance.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fbi-attack-trump-mueller-republicans_us_5a6b3fe7e4b0ddb658c5c3fd?utm_medium =email&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__012918&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__012918+CID_47103673 79d2a00e75b167a278a2391e&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=extraordinary%20attack%20on%20law%20enfor cement&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__012918

America is being forced, dragged into an autocracy by the oligarchy.

their main points

Govt sucks, defund it

non-right-wing-hate media sucks, sue it for libel

Law enforcement sucks (only when it goes after Trash, Repugs),

All Oligarchy/Repugs are ABOVE THE LAW

Trash, Repugs, right wing hate media are the only sources of The One True Truth

[TSA]

Who doesn’t get their political news from TrumpSoldier?

Find me an MSM article that includes the accompanying senate testimony and supporting congressional letters.

[Pavlov]

But the Senate committee can't see muh memo.

Why is that, TSA?

[TSA]

McCabe Resigns After FBI Director Wray Reviews House FISA Abuse Memo

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was forced to resign Monday, just as the House Intelligence Committee is expected to vote on the public release of a classified memo this afternoon revealing extensive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse under the Obama administration, sources told this reporter.

McCabe apparently lashed out to his colleagues when he was told he would be asked to resign, according to sources. FBI Director Christopher Wray viewed the four-page memo on Sunday, sources familiar with the discussions said.

McCabe, who is facing three federal inquiries for conflicts-of-interest during his time at the FBI, is one of the numerous names mentioned in the classified memo detailing FISA abuse, according to sources who reviewed the memo.

The federal inquiries into allegations against McCabe, who was expected to resign in March, are based on documents and interviews conducted by this reporter over the past year and range from sexual discrimination to improper political activity.

McCabe, a central figure in the ongoing Russia investigation against Trump, is also part of the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s ongoing review into the FBI’s handling of former Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to send classified information.

Current and former FBI officials said McCabe’s resignation is the beginning of more resignations to come.

“There are people lining up in the bureau to go after McCabe,” said a former FBI official, with knowledge. “There will be a clean up at the Bureau of his cronies.”

According to several U.S. officials, McCabe’s government communications were collected as part of the ongoing DOJ Inspector General investigation, which is expected to be completed by March.

FBI spokeswoman Carol Cratty declined to comment on the resignation.

The process to declassify the document could take anywhere up to five days. President Trump is not expected to object to the memo’s release and the House Intelligence Committee is expected to pass it, stated White House officials in an earlier report.

“My understanding is they will proceed with the vote tonight,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, an Ohio Republican. “This memo is something I want every single journalist and American to see, I think it’s that important. If Wray saw the memo, there maybe something to McCabe’s resignation. Or it could also be something as innocent as him using his sick time or leave up until retirement.”

The classified memo is considered “explosive and shocking” and hundreds of Republican members and only a dozen or so Democrats have taken the opportunity to review the report in a secured area, according to congressional sources. The memo also contains information that suggests Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein reauthorized warrants based in part on the unverified dossier to gather communications on former Trump advisor Carter Page, sources said.

House Freedom Caucus chairman Mark Meadows, R-NC, said that he is hopeful the memo will be released to the public and called its contents “shocking.”

“I think from my standpoint there are concerns about political interference by law enforcement and judiciary agencies,” said Meadows, as he prepared to board a flight back to Washington D.C. “These important issues require greater transparency ad it’s critical lady justice remains blindfolded and that the privileged do not have the upper hand in the judicial system.”

Democrat Adam Schiff, D-CA, who has long stated he believes President Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia but has offered no proof, said the classified memo is “profoundly misleading” and asked that it not be released

Carter Page, who is one figure at the center of the memo’s revelations, filed his most recent libel lawsuit against Oath and Broadcasting Board of Governors, Radio Free Europe for the story “Report: U.S. Intelligence Officials Examining Trump Advisor’s Russia Ties” written Sept. 23, 2016. The report came a day after Yahoo published a report, which cited multiple sources that suggested Page was under investigation for his ties to Russia. Page has also filed libel suits against Yahoo News and Buzzfeed. Page asserts in the lawsuit that he was a victim of “swatting,” a term used when a group or person provides false information to law enforcement to provoke an emergency action to be taken against a target.

The dossier, which was compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele, was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign. The DNC and Clinton campaign had hired now embattled research firm Fusion GPS to compile the research. Fusion GPS had previously lobbied on behalf of companies closely connected to Russian President Vladimir Putin against the Magnitisky Act, a U.S. law prohibiting companies and people connected to the death of Sergei Magnitsky from owning property or conducting business in the United States. Magnitsky was an auditor at a law firm in Moscow who uncovered $230 million worth of fraud by Russian tax officials and police officers. After he reported the fraud he was detained by Russian authorities and then died in a prison under suspicious circumstances in 2009.

“By falsely and publicly identifying Dr. Page in the U.S., Europe and worldwide as the main accomplice in the most prominent crime story in recent history and simultaneously mischaracterizing the libelous articles as primarily stemming from slightly more legitimate leakers within USG (U.S. government) agencies rather than the opposition political research consultant Christopher Steele, BBG and RFE played an essential roles in the USG’s black propaganda campaign by branding him as the subject of completely outrageous criminal allegations instigated by earlier excerpts from Mr. Steele’s final report (the “Dodgy Dossier”),” Page states in his complaint filed on January, 19.

Page, who lists a number of previous ‘swatting’ cases, states in his complaint, “In these more benign and little-known swatting cases, defendants have been held accountable by courts…The alleged untruthfulness attached to the DOJ’s allegations in the illegitimate FISA warrant issued against Dr. Page and related abuse of process in 2016 based on the dodgy dossier helps to directly fulfill that burden.”

The Department of Justice and some leading Democrats attempted to stop the committee from releasing the classified FISA abuse memo, citing that the classified nature of the document could threaten national security. The DOJ argued in a letter written by Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd that the department had not been given the document for review.

However, several members of the committee told this reporter that the information contained in the memo is lists extensive FISA abuse that occurred before and after the 2016 presidential election cycle.

“What’s important is that the American people will be informed and that the corruption by a few people inside the bureau and DOJ will be exposed,” said a former FBI source with knowledge of the situation. “We can’t move forward unless we as a nation are willing to come clean about what’s been going on and the first step is telling the truth.”

https://saraacarter.com/mccabe-resigns-fbi-director-wray-reviews-house-fisa-abuse-memo/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

The Unraveling

[Pavlov]

:lmao You just said Wray couldn't see the memo because the FBI was under investigation.

Pick a lane, TSA.

[TSA]

:cry why won't Nunes show the FBI the memo :cry


:lmao You just said Wray couldn't see the memo because the FBI was under investigation.

Pick a lane, TSA.

I said Nunes was under no legal obligation to show the FBI/DOJ. Keep the emojis coming though, dead giveaway when you're shook.

[Pavlov]

I said Nunes was under no legal obligation to show the FBI/DOJ. Keep the emojis coming though, dead giveaway when you're shook.You just put emojis into a fake quote.

You're shook. Dead giveaway.

That and all the questions you've flat ignored the past few days. Your narrative is dead and you need to replace it.

[hater]

Do we need a blue scalps totem pole nigas???


Shits about to get real

[TSA]

958042870216298498

[Pavlov]

Leaks bad now.

What are they saying he leaked? That the dossier was used for FISA warrants? That doesn't make any sense.

[TSA]

:cry why didn't you spend your entire weekend on spurstalk answering my questions :cry

[TSA]

958056498487267333

[Pavlov]

Keep the emojis and fake quotes coming, TSA. Further confirmation you're shook.

And update your narrative -- it has been destroyed.

You ignored several questions today.

You're afraid.

[Pavlov]

958056498487267333Leaks good now.

Pick a lane, TSA.

[TSA]

Keep the emojis and fake quotes coming, TSA. Further confirmation you're shook.

And update your narrative -- it has been destroyed.

You ignored several questions today.

You're afraid.
You're Pavjecting again.


Why don't you mosey on back to your muh Russian collusion thread and keep your shitposting confined to that thread. This thread is for the actual collusion that took place during the investigation.

[TSA]

But the Senate committee can't see muh memo.

Why is that, TSA?

6) Expect major pushback from anyone who latched onto the Russia-Trump collusion theory over the last year.

The 4-page document will reportedly discuss FBI and DOJ handling of Democrat-funded opposition research that was used in official law enforcement work. The more Americans learn about the Russia-Trump collusion theory, the more it seems that the entire story was cooked up by that Democrat-funded opposition research. None of the substantive allegations in the infamous Steele dossier have been independently verified.

If there really is nothing to the Trump-Russia collusion theory, it poses something of an existential crisis for those who bought into the theory as their best hope for removing the elected president. That includes the activist left, the Democratic Party, the mainstream media, and also elements of the NeverTrump right. Among all the theories and attacks on the president, be they legitimate or illegitimate, the Russia theory is set apart and special because of its impeachment power and key to ousting him. While a few Republicans in Congress are working against those forces, the combined power and messaging coordination of the resistance is formidable.

You can see this already with how minor messaging points are blown up into large stories. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) told journalists he was not allowed to see the House Intelligence Committee memo. That’s true, since the only legal access right now is for House members and Burr does not serve in the House but the Senate. It would at the very least require a vote of the entire committee to change those access protocols without violating rules. Still, a combined messaging campaign arose out of this talking point.

Earlier, resistance-allied journalists pushed the talking point that the FBI wasn’t allowed to see the memo alleging abuses at the FBI. These journalists were apparently confused as to which of the two entities has oversight of the other. The FBI is an inferior subordinate agency. Perhaps that’s a reasonable confusion in light of FBI behavior in recent years, but divided government is a real thing that remains. But the document might also encompass other agencies. Why would the FBI get a preview before other agencies? In any case, expect a lot of drama and pushback against the document.

https://thefederalist.com/2018/01/25/what-to-expect-from-the-house-intel-memo-on-surveillance-abuse/

[TSA]

What To Expect From The House Intel Memo On Surveillance Abuse

https://thefederalist.com/2018/01/25/what-to-expect-from-the-house-intel-memo-on-surveillance-abuse/

[Pavlov]

You're Pavjecting again.


Why don't you mosey on back to your muh Russian collusion thread and keep your shitposting confined to that thread. This thread is for the actual collusion that took place during the investigation.Since you are triggered by emojis, I will tell you I am laughing out loud at your going back to muh bet.

You're avoiding that thread like that plague now and I can't blame you for being such a pussy.

Why can't the Senate see muh memo when your twitter gods are leaking its contents, TSA?

[TSA]

Since you are triggered by emojis, I will tell you I am laughing out loud at your going back to muh bet.

You're avoiding that thread like that plague now and I can't blame you for being such a pussy. I'm not avoiding any thread and have no clue what you are talking about.


Why can't the Senate see muh memo when your twitter gods are leaking its contents, TSA?

You are so shook you missed the explanation two posts above yours that I even bolded for you.

Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) told journalists he was not allowed to see the House Intelligence Committee memo. That’s true, since the only legal access right now is for House members and Burr does not serve in the House but the Senate. It would at the very least require a vote of the entire committee to change those access protocols without violating rules. Still, a combined messaging campaign arose out of this talking point.

You've fallen for all the talking points the left has attempted to discredit Nunes memo. You'll keep falling for them and digging yourself a deeper hole and I'll continue to mock you.

[boutons_deux]

Anything from nutty nunes is shit

[koriwhat]

When Qanon said the storm was coming I didn't realize it was going to be an endless stream of articles from the far lefty boutons he/she/it was speaking of.

[TSA]

djohn2oo8 how does this line up with your Wray theory?

958096102812774405

[Pavlov]

I'm not avoiding any thread and have no clue what you are talking about.I am laughing out loud at your feigned ignorance. Today's questions are pending in the threads you are avoiding.



You are so shook you missed the explanation two posts above yours that I even bolded for you.

Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) told journalists he was not allowed to see the House Intelligence Committee memo. That’s true, since the only legal access right now is for House members and Burr does not serve in the House but the Senate. It would at the very least require a vote of the entire committee to change those access protocols without violating rules. Still, a combined messaging campaign arose out of this talking point.

You've fallen for all the talking points the left has attempted to discredit Nunes memo. You'll keep falling for them and digging yourself a deeper hole and I'll continue to mock you.So they voted to let all the House members see muh memo but no one at all in the Senate because it would require -- a vote. Meanwhile you're tweeting info people claim is leaked from muh memo.

I'm rolling on the floor laughing at you. You're a fool.

[TSA]

958021512489037825

[boutons_deux]

Sessions pressured by Trash to attack opponents in a conspiracy of obstruction

[TSA]

I am laughing out loud at your feigned ignorance. Today's questions are pending in the threads you are avoiding.


So they voted to let all the House members see muh memo but no one at all in the Senate because it would require -- a vote. Meanwhile you're tweeting info people claim is leaked from muh memo.

I'm rolling on the floor laughing at you. You're a fool.

poor thing is Pavjecting again.

you act like a little bitch when you are embarrassed, grow the fuck up and accept that the MSM played you for a fool for a year +.

[TSA]

958054676712361984

[Pavlov]

poor thing is Pavjecting again.

you act like a little bitch when you are embarrassed, grow the fuck up and accept that the MSM played you for a fool for a year +.I am openly mocking you and the backflips you are doing to try to fit muh memo into your already destroyed narrative.

[TSA]

958080413494333447

[TSA]

I am openly mocking you and the backflips you are doing to try to fit muh memo into your already destroyed narrative.

You are embarrassed and are lashing out. It's embarrassing and amusing at the same time.

[Pavlov]

You are embarrassed and are lashing out. It's embarrassing and amusing at the same time.Nah, I am asking you pointed and direct questions that you are dodging. You're embarrassed and lashing out because you know you were wrong and it kills you inside -- just like #pizzagate.

[TSA]

958046072076685312

[TSA]

Nah, I am asking you pointed and direct questions that you are dodging. You're embarrassed and lashing out because you know you were wrong and it kills you inside -- just like #pizzagate.

You're Pavjecting again and it's painfully obvious. There is absolutely nothing for me to be embarrassed about and I'm thoroughly enjoying today's breaking news. I think I even told you shit would hit the fan the day before the SOTU. I predict from this point forward you will just continue to dig yourself a deeper hole while trying to ignore everything that is actually coming to light. Sad.

[Pavlov]

You're Pavjecting again and it's painfully obvious. There is absolutely nothing for me to be embarrassed about and I'm thoroughly enjoying today's breaking news. I think I even told you shit would hit the fan the day before the SOTU. I predict from this point forward you will just continue to dig yourself a deeper hole while trying to ignore everything that is actually coming to light. Sad.What's sad is your complete shutdown and devolution into a bot.

You've given up any actual discussion, just started posting tweets and memes a la Chris and I'm enjoying it immensely. You want everyone to forget your old conspiracy theories by bringing out shiny new ones.

[TSA]

What's sad is your complete shutdown and devolution into a bot.

You've given up any actual discussion, just started posting tweets and memes a la Chris and I'm enjoying it immensely.

Your tired schtick is only worthy of tweets and memes.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/ldwi.gif

[TSA]

958104920997101568

can't stop the storm

[Pavlov]

Your tired schtick is only worthy of tweets and memes.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/ldwi.gifYou can't discuss things anymore since your narrative was destroyed. I get it. You just can't admit it -- you did the exact same thing with #pizzagate when I posted your newfound hero warning of the dangers of Cat Stevens mind control.

You post stupid shit and when it is proved to be stupid shit you pretend you never did any of it.

That's your shtick.

[Pavlov]

958104920997101568

can't stop the stormIs that sundance?

LOL TSA's stromfront

[TSA]

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/shm2.gif

[Pavlov]

See, you're not even trying to discuss anymore.

You've surrendered.

I accept.

[TSA]

See, you're not even trying to discuss anymore.

You've surrendered.

I accept.


Your tired schtick is only worthy of tweets and memes.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/ldwi.gif

[Pavlov]

I already accepted your surrender, TSA.

Deal with it.

[TSA]

958116078051213313

Horowitz :bobo

[TSA]

http://i.imgur.com/KETXSgN.gif

[Pavlov]

Wait, was it the memo or the OIG report?

Pick a lane, TSA.

[hater]

Boom

Shits is going to get real now

Blue Totem Pole about to get filles to thw brim with scalps

[Pavlov]

hater's been saying shits going to get real for two years.

[dabom]

hater's been saying shits going to get real for two years.

:lol

[boutons_deux]

Trash called up McCabe, trash talked him, called his wife a loser, and hung up

Trash is piece of shit dickless bully loser.

[Reck]

You are embarrassed and are lashing out. It's embarrassing and amusing at the same time.

Are you derptacular's alt?

You're using his tactics. Fake quotes, using out of context, nonsensical points and even using words like "lashing out."

Either you're him or you have sunked so low you have begun taking your cues from the biggest retard on ST.

:lol TSA

[Reck]

1) faking quotes


Schtick.


Your tired schtick is only worthy of tweets and memes.


Hmm, can't spell potato or shtick.

:lol Exposed

[Spurtacular]

:lol Exposed

Tranny desperate for some dick riding. :lol

[TSA]

https://i1.wp.com/politopinion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Adam-Schiff-Crazy-Looking.jpg?fit=640%2C401

[DarrinS]

Should be an interesting week.

[Isitjustme?]

OP believes in pizzagate

[Reck]

TSA What's in this super secret memo? Rod Rosenstein extending a surveillance on Carter Page? :wow

[TSA]

TSA What's in this super secret memo? Rod Rosenstein extending a surveillance on Carter Page? :wow

You’ve completely mistaken my stance on Rosenstein and you look foolish every time you try to go down this path. I explained this to you earlier. Not doing it twice.

[TSA]

https://judiciary.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/3901_001.pdf?utm_source=House+Judiciary+Committee+ Press+Releases&utm_campaign=5ddb7f8621-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_01_29&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_df41eba8fd-5ddb7f8621-

Goodlatte coming out swinging.

Enjoy the Unraveling.

[Reck]

You’ve completely mistaken my stance on Rosenstein and you look foolish every time you try to go down this path. I explained this to you earlier. Not doing it twice.

You're on the record saying Rosenstein had been working with Nunes. :lol

Looking foolish is yout middle name. Third being flip flopper.

[TSA]

You're on the record saying Rosenstein had been working with Nunes. :lol

Looking foolish is yout middle name. Third being flip flopper.

No, I said Rosenstein handed over the documents to Nunes. This only happened after the threat of holding him contempt.

Stop fighting meaningless losing battles. Sit back and watch this all unfold. We the people are slowing getting back our government.

[Reck]

No, I said Rosenstein handed over the documents to Nunes. This only happened after the threat of holding him contempt.

Stop fighting meaningless losing battles. Sit back and watch this all unfold. We the people are slowing getting back our government.

How are you getting back the government when it didn't go anywhere in the first place?

:lol deep state
:lol I dont always fall for fake news, but when I do, I believe in the deep state conspiracies

[TSA]

One of the unsung heroes in all of this, appointed by true Patriot and lifelong spook Gen. Flynn

The Man McMaster Couldn't Fire

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/ezra-cohen-watnick/534615/

[angrydude]

How are you getting back the government when it didn't go anywhere in the first place?

:lol deep state
:lol I dont always fall for fake news, but when I do, I believe in the deep state conspiracies

Because people in power in Washington DC who went to school together and share the same political beliefs don't talk to each other. Ever. About anything. And certainly wouldn't try to do anything to create the sort of world they would like to see.

Grow up.

[Reck]

One of the unsung heroes in all of this, appointed by true Patriot and lifelong spook Gen. Flynn


Patriots dont plead guilty to anything. Or become snitches.

[TSA]

One of the unsung heroes in all of this, appointed by true Patriot and lifelong spook Gen. Flynn

The Man McMaster Couldn't Fire

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/ezra-cohen-watnick/534615/


There was one person, however, who McMaster couldn’t get rid of: Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence programs. McMaster tried to remove him in March, but President Trump, at the urging of Bannon and Jared Kushner, told McMaster that Cohen-Watnick was staying, as first reported by Politico. According to a senior White House official, the two men had a sit-down meeting the following week in which McMaster acknowledged that he hadn’t been able to do what he wanted to do, and that they would keep things as they are and “see how they go for a while.” That was over four months ago. That Cohen-Watnick, 31 years old and largely unknown before entering the administration, has become unfireable reveals how important he has become to the Trump White House, where loyalty is prized

The senior in Cohen-Watnick’s title reflects the importance of his job, if not the level of experience he brings to it. The senior director for intelligence programs on the NSC is a powerful position, designed to coordinate and liaise between the U.S. intelligence community and the White House.

"If the incumbent has an effective working relationship with the national-security adviser or even the president directly, the senior director for intelligence has an opportunity to exercise considerable influence on intelligence policy, covert actions, and sensitive collection operations," said Stephen Slick, a former CIA official who held the position during the Bush administration.

The CIA has traditionally had control over who fills this position, and normally the job is staffed by a more experienced official. McMaster, assuming he’d be allowed to relieve or reassign Cohen-Watnick, had gone so far as to interview Cohen-Watnick’s potential replacement, Linda Weissgold, a veteran CIA officer.

Despite his prominent, and apparently quite secure, position in Trump’s NSC, little is known about Cohen-Watnick, who had spent much of his short career as a low-ranking official at the Defense Intelligence Agency. Information about him in publicly available sources is scarce. Few higher-ups from the DIA remember him. Only one picture of him can be found online, a snapshot unearthed by Al-Monitor’s Laura Rozen.

Mike Flynn appointed unfireable super spook :bobo

[TSA]

Patriots dont plead guilty to anything. Or become snitches.

You’ve never witnessed a true Patriot such as Gen. Flynn

The process crime he pleas to will be pardoned, laughed at, and then he’ll praised as a hero.

[spurraider21]

You’ve never witnessed a true Patriot such as Gen. Flynn

The process crime he pleas to will be pardoned, laughed at, and then he’ll praised as a hero.
why did flynn have to commit a felony to expose fisa abuse? why couldn't they just go straight to the OIG investigation without flynn intentionally committing a felony?

[TSA]

why did flynn have to commit a felony to expose fisa abuse? why couldn't they just go straight to the OIG investigation without flynn intentionally committing a felony?

Only master spook Flynn knows the answer, but I’m sure it had something to do with continued surveillance on Strzok, Ohr, Page, McCabe etc after Flynn chose to lie to Strzok.

Military intelligence will Trump civilian intelligence every time, and these civilian intel agents were sloppy and cocky. Hillary was supposed to win in a landslide, none of this was supposed to come to light.

Time to hop off the sinking ship.

[hater]

And shit didnt get reqlmChumphumper??

You even changed your login name :lmao

[Reck]

Only master spook Flynn knows the answer, but I’m sure it had something to do with continued surveillance on Strzok, Ohr, Page, McCabe etc after Flynn chose to lie to Strzok.

Military intelligence will Trump civilian intelligence every time, and these civilian intel agents were sloppy and cocky. Hillary was supposed to win in a landslide, none of this was supposed to come to light.

Time to hop off the sinking ship.

The only one getting laughed at is you.

Listen to yourself talk dude. Master spook, Flynn will be praised as a hero by everyone etc. :lol

[DarrinS]

Will be fun watching the existential crisis at CNN et. al.

[Spurminator]

Will be fun watching the existential crisis at CNN et. al.

You realize you have over a year's worth and about 5000 posts pretending that you're above caring about any of this.

[DarrinS]

You have over a year's worth and about 5000 posts pretending that you're above caring about any of this.

You are about the tenth person talking about my “caring” about this issue and my post count.

Skepticism is not synonymous with apathy.

[Reck]

You are about the tenth person talking about my “caring” about this issue and my post count.

Skepticism is not synonymous with apathy.

You know, it would go a long ways if you just come out as a Trump lapdog.

This I dont care nor am I a Trump supporter act hasn't been working for you.

[DarrinS]

You know, it would go a long ways if you just come out as a Trump lapdog.

This I dont care nor am I a Trump supporter act hasn't been working for you.


And another.

[Spurminator]

You are about the tenth person talking about my “caring” about this issue and my post count.

Skepticism is not synonymous with apathy.

Then you might agree that the absence of apathy, such as CNN covering this legitimate and continuing story, is not absence of skepticism.

You've chosen a position and chosen to mock the other position. Don't try to paint it another way. 5001 posts in, no one is buying it.

[DarrinS]

Then you might agree that the absence of apathy, such as CNN covering this legitimate and continuing story, is not absence of skepticism.

You've chosen a position and chosen to mock the other position. Don't try to paint it another way. 5001 posts in, no one is buying it.


If I’m skeptical of #muhRussiaCollusion, why would I NOT mock it?

[boutons_deux]

Repugs vote to release Nunes' lying propaganda shit, but to block Dems' more complete refuting counter-report.


Dems should publish their stuff anyway, have to out-crazy the Repug criminal crazies.

[hater]

Shits getting real nigas

I hope we dont see blood on the streets tbqh

[Spurtacular]

And shit didnt get reqlmChumphumper??

You even changed your login name :lmao

He took the blue pill. :lol

[Spurtacular]

I already accepted your surrender, TSA.

Deal with it.

2) Declaring victory.

:rollin

[Isitjustme?]

Shits getting real nigas

I hope we dont see blood on the streets tbqh

Lol

[TSA]

The only one getting laughed at is you.

Listen to yourself talk dude. Master spook, Flynn will be praised as a hero by everyone etc. :lol


You’re a sheep, and a dumb one at that. The longer you refuse to acknowledge the Unraveling the stupider you are pegged. Choice is up to you from here on out.

[TSA]

You realize you have over a year's worth and about 5000 posts pretending that you're above caring about any of this.

And how many posts do you have concerning the OIG investigation?

[Chris]

TSA What's in this super secret memo? Rod Rosenstein extending a surveillance on Carter Page? :wow

FISA abuse

HRC and DNC roles in obtaining the Steele Dossier

It's a condensed form of thousands of pages of documents.

[spurraider21]

FISA abuse

HRC and DNC roles in obtaining the Steele Dossier

It's a condensed form of thousands of pages of documents.
how seriously would you take a 3 page memo authored by Blake that he claimed was a condensed form of the bible

[Pavlov]

And how many posts do you have concerning the OIG investigation?

Who knows? You've been working so hard to distract from the Mueller investigation it seems you work for Nunes.

[Chris]

how seriously would you take a 3 page memo authored by Blake that he claimed was a condensed form of the bible

Hah, comparing Nunes to Blake and intel to scripture. You are a master of conflation.

[monosylab1k]

Hah, comparing Nunes to Blake and intel to scripture. You are a master of conflation.

:lmao little pussyass Chris hiding from this


Netflix Soars On Q4 Subscriber Adds

Shares rocketed to record highs as Netflix ( NFLX ) added 8.33 million streaming subscribers worldwide , crushing its fourth-quarter target of 6.3 million.

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/stocks-hit-highs-as-netflix-soars-on-subscribers-united-sinks-airlines-biotech-ma-heats-up-weekly-review-cm911414

:lmao

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You are about the tenth person talking about my “caring” about this issue and my post count.

Skepticism is not synonymous with apathy.

And all you do is point out that people are pointing out your lies and hypocrisy. Thou remain a sophist piece of shit.

[Spurminator]

And how many posts do you have concerning the OIG investigation?

Very few if any because I am practicing actual skepticism.

[spurraider21]

Hah, comparing Nunes to Blake and intel to scripture. You are a master of conflation.
im comparing people who have a dog in the fight and thus are probably not the most objective...

[Th'Pusher]

If I’m skeptical of #muhRussiaCollusion, why would I NOT mock it?

So if you’re skeptical about The existence of God, does that warrant your mocking of those who aren’t?

As Spurminator already said, you’re not skeptical. You’ve chosen a side and youre firmly planted in Trump’s camp. Own it and stop being a pussy.

[TSA]

958383687711600640

The wheels have officially fallen off.

[TSA]

FBI’s Wray makes clear McCabe’s retirement tied to IG’s Clinton report

FBI Director Chris Wray made clear in a message sent to all bureau employees on Monday night that Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's decision to step aside was a result of forthcoming information to be detailed in an Inspector General report, according to a copy of his message obtained by NBC News.

Wray alluded to having seen aspects of the IG's report into the way the FBI handled the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private e-mail server.

"It would be inappropriate for me to comment on specific aspects of the IG's review right now," Wray said in the message. "But I can assure you that I remain staunchly committed to doing this job, in every respect, 'by the book.' I will not be swayed by political or other pressure in my decision making."

In the very next paragraph, Wray explained that McCabe had submitted his intention to retire, suggesting a connection between the findings of the IG report and McCabe's decision.

Several sources familiar with McCabe's move said the he made his decision as a result of a meeting with Wray in which the Inspector General's investigation was discussed.

News that McCabe would leave his role seven weeks before he was expected to retire triggered speculation on Monday that he was being forced to leave under political pressure from President Donald Trump. But several FBI insiders said that was not the case.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-s-wray-makes-clear-mccabe-s-retirement-tied-ig-n842671

[spurraider21]

FBI’s Wray makes clear McCabe’s retirement tied to IG’s Clinton report

FBI Director Chris Wray made clear in a message sent to all bureau employees on Monday night that Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's decision to step aside was a result of forthcoming information to be detailed in an Inspector General report, according to a copy of his message obtained by NBC News.

Wray alluded to having seen aspects of the IG's report into the way the FBI handled the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private e-mail server.

"It would be inappropriate for me to comment on specific aspects of the IG's review right now," Wray said in the message. "But I can assure you that I remain staunchly committed to doing this job, in every respect, 'by the book.' I will not be swayed by political or other pressure in my decision making."

In the very next paragraph, Wray explained that McCabe had submitted his intention to retire, suggesting a connection between the findings of the IG report and McCabe's decision.

Several sources familiar with McCabe's move said the he made his decision as a result of a meeting with Wray in which the Inspector General's investigation was discussed.

News that McCabe would leave his role seven weeks before he was expected to retire triggered speculation on Monday that he was being forced to leave under political pressure from President Donald Trump. But several FBI insiders said that was not the case.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-s-wray-makes-clear-mccabe-s-retirement-tied-ig-n842671
:lol suggesting a connection = MADE CLEAR

[koriwhat]

it's going to be a grand day when the clinton cartel is taken down, beady eyed fuckface mccabe is shot for treason, and comey is getting his shit pushed in by bubba. ah i can't wait!

[Pavlov]

958383687711600640

The wheels have officially fallen off.That article didn't say what you wanted it to say.

[Chris]

comey

He's buttering McCabe up on twitter because he knows he's next in the domino chain. Goes all the way up to Obama.

[Chris]

958145125120663553

:cry:cry:cry

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUwH5dtVMAAZrOI.jpg:large

[monosylab1k]

it's going to be a grand day when the clinton cartel is taken down, beady eyed fuckface mccabe is shot for treason, and comey is getting his shit pushed in by bubba. ah i can't wait!

How Republican of you.

[Pavlov]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUwH5dtVMAAZrOI.jpg:largeWhat are you saying Obama is going to prison for, Chris?

[spurraider21]

What are you saying Obama is going to prison for, Chris?
unlawful exposed as being a fraud

[koriwhat]

How Republican of you.

How Retarded of you.

[Blake]

it's going to be a grand day when the clinton cartel is taken down, beady eyed fuckface mccabe is shot for treason, and comey is getting his shit pushed in by bubba. ah i can't wait!

But you don't do accusations. You need proof.

[Pavlov]

it's going to be a grand day when the clinton cartel is taken down, beady eyed fuckface mccabe is shot for treason, and comey is getting his shit pushed in by bubba. ah i can't wait!You'll believe anything said against them but when women accuse men of sexual harassment you demand jury trials before any opinion can be posted.

[monosylab1k]

You'll believe anything said against them but when women accuse men of sexual harassment you demand jury trials before any opinion can be posted.

:lmao

[Chris]

Why did Mueller and Comey ignore McCabe's ties to Russian organized crime and official business? Not only that he was put in charge of the Trump Russia investigation :lol

[Pavlov]

Why did Mueller and Comey ignore McCabe's ties to Russian organized crime and official business? Not only that he was put in charge of the Trump Russia investigation :lolMcCabe's ties to Russian organized crime?

OK, post your source.

[Chris]

What are you saying Obama is going to prison for, Chris?

Can't wait to find out.

[Pavlov]

Can't wait to find out.:lol memeboy is stumped

[Chris]

McCabe's ties to Russian organized crime?

OK, post your source.

https://truepundit.com/comey-mueller-ignored-mccabes-ties-to-russian-crime-figures-his-reported-tampering-in-russian-fbi-cases-files/

[Pavlov]

https://truepundit.com/comey-mueller-ignored-mccabes-ties-to-russian-crime-figures-his-reported-tampering-in-russian-fbi-cases-files/Anonymous article citing anonymous sources?

lol

[Chris]

blahblahblah lol tl/dr cognitivedissonancethesewordsconflictwithmyprogram ming.exe

[Pavlov]

Sorry man, no one else in the world corroborates any of your anonymous, made up crap.

Sucks for you.

[Blake]

https://truepundit.com/comey-mueller-ignored-mccabes-ties-to-russian-crime-figures-his-reported-tampering-in-russian-fbi-cases-files/

"Notes: True Pundit occasionally publishes a legitimate story, some*are*conspiracies. *This source also currently delivers news straight from the*Daily Caller*which has a strong right-wing bias. Most articles from True Pundit have anonymous authors. *This source has also been flagged for*false information*and has an*unproven claim. Simply not trustworthy. (10/4/2016) Update (6/19/2017)"


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-pundit/

Fascinating

[koriwhat]

But you don't do accusations. You need proof.

let's see...
HRC illegal activities include but not limited to a private server sending CONFIDENTIAL info out and about willy nilly.
Comey perjured himself on CSPAN.
McCabe is knee deep in this coup d'etat.

Dismiss what you'd like if you feel your house of cards is crumbling.


You'll believe anything said against them but when women accuse men of sexual harassment you demand jury trials before any opinion can be posted.

see above.

btw, i don't give a fuck about a bunch of celebrities getting sexually harassed. if i had to guess, they put themselves in that position to be abused. money talks, bs walks, and these victims wait decades to come out when they could've saved others from the same treatment that endured. sad they're abused but i really have no sympathy for Hollywood or it's darlings in the biz. As for those out of Hollywood, why wait decades to come forward? An opportune time? Coincidence? Money bribes? it's just sad these victims would sit by and let others be victimized as well. I've never had to deal with this stuff personally so what the hell do I know anyhow. Maybe it's soul crushing and just the thought of telling your story makes you feel victimized again. I don't know.

[Pavlov]

let's see...
HRC illegal activities include but not limited to a private server sending CONFIDENTIAL info out and about willy nilly.
Comey perjured himself on CSPAN.
McCabe is knee deep in this coup d'etatNope. Gotta prove it in a court of law.

You said.

[Blake]

let's see...
HRC illegal activities include but not limited to a private server sending CONFIDENTIAL info out and about willy nilly.
Comey perjured himself on CSPAN.
McCabe is knee deep in this coup d'etat.

Dismiss what you'd like if you feel your house of cards is crumbling.

definitely death penalty worthy!

:lol some day you'll finally admit to yourself that you're a staunch republican

[koriwhat]

"Notes: True Pundit occasionally publishes a legitimate story, some*are*conspiracies. *This source also currently delivers news straight from the*Daily Caller*which has a strong right-wing bias. Most articles from True Pundit have anonymous authors. *This source has also been flagged for*false information*and has an*unproven claim. Simply not trustworthy. (10/4/2016) Update (6/19/2017)"


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-pundit/

Fascinating

what's fascinating is you believe in medabiasfactcheck but not truepundit. you believe in dipshit prostitute loving snopes too? i follow truepundit and they've been pretty consistent with their stories and well ahead of the MSM by months and even a yr at times. Is everything a conspiracy to you if it's not far left leaning?

[Pavlov]

what's fascinating is you believe in medabiasfactcheck but not truepundit. you believe in dipshit prostitute loving snopes too? i follow truepundit and they've been pretty consistent with their stories and well ahead of the MSM by months and even a yr at times. Is everything a conspiracy to you if it's not far left leaning?:lmao follows truepundit.

[koriwhat]

Nope. Gotta prove it in a court of law.

You said.

in due time. Evidence is out there, but you can't say that for most of those sexual harassment accusations you brought into this discussion.


definitely death penalty worthy!

:lol some day you'll finally admit to yourself that you're a staunch republican

some day i will laugh while you make another worthless thread but this time you'll be crying that your party took its last breath.

[Pavlov]

in due time. Evidence is out there, but you can't say that for most of those sexual harassment accusations you brought into this discussion.Actually I did provide real convictions.

Hundreds.

After you asked for them.

[spurraider21]

Actually I did provide real convictions.

Hundreds.

After you asked for them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx32b5igLwA

[Blake]

some day i will laugh while you make another worthless thread but this time you'll be crying that your party took its last breath.

I have no idea what you're saying here.

But you should be enjoying your party being in power at the moment. :toast

[koriwhat]

I have no idea what you're saying here.

But you should be enjoying your party being in power at the moment. :toast

my party lmao

my party consists of psychedelics, bud, and a good music.

[Pavlov]

my party lmao

my party consists of psychedelics, bud, and a good music.And truepundit and rageposting.

[Spurminator]

my party lmao

my party consists of psychedelics, bud, and a good music.

Republicans want all recreational drugs to be illegal and their music is terrible. Why are you Republican?

[TSA]

Hillary’s ‘Sure’ Victory Explains Most Everything

What exactly were top officials in the FBI and DOJ doing during the election of 2016? The Page-Strzok text exchanges might offer a few answers. Or, as Lisa Page warned her paramour as early as February 2016, at the beginning of the campaign and well before the respective party nominees were even selected: One more thing: she [Hillary Clinton] might be our next president. The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more doj than fbi? The traditional way of looking at the developing scandals at the FBI and among holdover Obama appointees in the DOJ is that the bizarre atmospherics from candidate and President Trump have simply polarized everyone in Washington, and no one quite knows what is going on. Another, more helpful, exegesis, however, is to understand that if we’d seen a Hillary Clinton victory in November 2016, which was supposed to be a sure thing, there would now be no scandals at all.

That is, the current players probably broke laws and committed ethical violations not just because they were assured there would be no consequences but also because they thought they’d be rewarded for their laxity. On the eve of the election, the New York Times tracked various pollsters’ models that had assured readers that Trump’s odds of winning were respectively 15 percent, 8 percent, 2 percent, and less than 1 percent. Liberals howled heresy at fellow progressive poll guru Nate Silver shortly before the vote for daring to suggest that Trump had a 29 percent chance of winning the Electoral College. Hillary Clinton herself was not worried about even the appearance of scandal caused by transmitting classified documents over a private home-brewed server, or enabling her husband to shake down foreign donations to their shared foundation, or destroying some 30,000 emails. Evidently, she instead reasoned that she was within months of becoming President Hillary Clinton and therefore, in her Clintonesque view of the presidency, exempt from all further criminal exposure. Would a President Clinton have allowed the FBI to reopen their strangely aborted Uranium One investigation; would the FBI have asked her whether she communicated over an unsecure server with the former president of the United States? Former attorney general Loretta Lynch, in unethical fashion, met on an out-of-the-way Phoenix tarmac with Bill Clinton, in a likely effort to find the most efficacious ways to communicate that the ongoing email scandal and investigation would not harm Hillary Clinton’s candidacy. When caught, thanks to local-news reporters who happened to be at the airport, Lynch sort of, kind of recused herself. But, in fact, at some point she had ordered James Comey not to use the word “investigation” in his periodic press announcements about the FBI investigation. How could Lynch in the middle of an election have been so silly as to allow even the appearance of impropriety? Answer: There would have been no impropriety had Hillary won — an assumption reflected in the Page-Strzok text trove when Page texted, about Lynch, “She knows no charges will be brought.” In fact, after a Clinton victory, Lynch’s obsequiousness in devising such a clandestine meeting with Bill Clinton may well have been rewarded: Clinton allies leaked to the New York Times that Clinton was considering keeping Lynch on as the attorney general. How could former deputy director of the FBI Andrew McCabe assume an oversight role in the FBI probe of the Clinton email scandal when just months earlier his spouse had run for state office in Virginia and had received a huge $450,000 cash donation from Common Good VA, the political-action committee of long-time Clinton-intimate Terry McAuliffe?

Again, the answer was clear. McCabe assumed that Clinton would easily win the election. Far from being a scandal, McCabe’s not “loaded for bear” oversight of the investigation, in the world of beltway maneuvering, would have been a good argument for a promotion in the new Clinton administration. Most elite bureaucrats understood the Clinton way of doing business, in which loyalty, not legality, is what earned career advancement. Some have wondered why the recently demoted deputy DOJ official Bruce Ohr (who met with the architects of the Fusion GPS file after the election) would have been so stupid as to allow his spouse to work for Fusion — a de facto Clinton-funded purveyor of what turned out to be Russian fantasies, fibs, and obscenities? Again, those are absolutely the wrong questions. Rather, why wouldn’t a successful member of the Obama administrative aparat make the necessary ethical adjustments to further his career in another two-term progressive regnum? In other words, Ohr rightly assumed that empowering the Clinton-funded dossier would pay career dividends for such a power couple once Hillary was elected. Or, in desperation, the dossier would at least derail Trump after her defeat. Like other members of his byzantine caste, Ohr did everything right except bet on the wrong horse. What about the recently reassigned FBI lawyer Lisa Page and FBI top investigator Peter Strzok? Their reported 50,000-plus text messages (do the math per hour at work, and it is hard to believe that either had to time to do much of anything else) are providing a Procopian court history of the entire Fusion-Mueller investigation miasma. So why did Strzok and Page believe that they could conduct without disclosure a romantic affair on FBI-government-owned cellphones? Why would they have been emboldened enough to cite a meeting with Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, in which they apparently discussed the dire consequences of an improbable Trump victory? I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s [probably Andrew McCabe, then deputy director of the FBI] office that there’s no way Trump gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40. And why would the two believe that they could so candidly express their contempt for a presidential candidate supposedly then under a secret FBI investigation? Once more, those are the wrong interrogatories. If we consider the mentality of government elite careerists, we see that the election-cycle machinations and later indiscretions of Strzok and Page were not liabilities at all. They were good investments. They signaled their loyalty to the incoming administration and that they were worthy of commendation and reward. Hillary Clinton’s sure victory certainly also explains the likely warping of the FISA courts by FBI careerists seeking to use a suspect dossier to surveille Trump associates — and the apparent requests by Samantha Power, Susan Rice, and others to read surveilled transcripts of Trump associates, unmask names, and leak them to pet reporters. Again, all these insiders were playing the careerist odds. What we view as reprehensible behavior, they at the time considered wise investments that would earn rewards with an ascendant President Hillary Clinton. Did Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, or Debbie Wasserman Shultz worry about their fabrications, unethical behavior, and various conspiratorial efforts to ensure that Hillary Clinton would be exempt from criminal liability in her email shenanigans, and that she would win the Democratic nomination and general election? Not when their equally unethical and conspiratorial boss would appreciate her subordinate soul mates. For a deep-state careerist without ethical bearings, one of the advantages of a Clinton sure-thing presidency would be that the Clintons are known to reward loyalty more highly than morality. Then we arrive at the tragic farce of former FBI director James Comey. It is now easy to deplore Comey’s unethical and unprofessional behavior: In all likelihood, he wrote an exoneration of Hillary Clinton before he even interviewed her and her top aides; then he lied about just that sequence while he was under oath and virtue-signaling before Congress; he feigned concern about Clinton’s felonious behavior but used linguistic gymnastics in his report to ensure his condemnation would be merely rhetorical and without legal consequences. Had Hillary won, as she was supposed to, Comey would probably have been mildly chastised for his herky-jerky press conferences, but ultimately praised for making sure the email scandal didn’t derail her. Comey’s later implosion, recall, occurred only after the improbable election of Donald Trump, as he desperately reversed course a fourth time and tried to ingratiate himself with Trump while hedging his bets by winking and nodding at the ongoing, unraveling fantasy of the Steele dossier. And Barack Obama? We now know that he himself used an alias to communicate at least 20 times with Hillary on her private, non-secure gmail account. But Obama lied on national TV, saying he learned of Hillary’s illegal server only when the rest of the nation did, by reading the news. Would he have dared to lie so publicly if he’d assumed that Trump’s presidency was imminent? Would he ever have allowed his subordinates to use the dossier to obtain FISA warrants and pass around and unmask the resulting surveillance transcripts if he’d seen Trump as the likely winner and a potentially angered president with powers to reinvestigate all these illegal acts? We sometimes forget that Barack Obama, not candidate Hillary Clinton, was president when the FBI conducted the lax investigation of the email scandal, when Loretta Lynch outsourced her prosecutorial prerogatives to James Comey, when the FBI trafficked with the Clinton-funded Fusion GPS dossier, when various DOJ and FBI lawyers requested FISA-approved surveillance largely on the basis of a fraudulent document, and when administration officials unmasked and leaked the names of American citizens. Had Hillary Clinton polled ten points behind Donald Trump in early 2016, we’d have none of these scandals — not because those involved were moral actors (none were), but because Hillary would have been considered yesterday’s damaged goods and not worth any extra-legal exposure taken on her behalf. Similarly, if the clear front-runner Hillary Clinton had won the election, we’d now have no scandals. Again, the reason is not that she and her careerist enablers did not engage in scandalous behavior, but that such foul play would have been recalibrated as rewardable fealty and absorbed into the folds of the progressive deep state. The only mystery in these sordid scandals is how a president Hillary Clinton would have rewarded her various appendages. In short, how would a President Clinton have calibrated the many rewards for any-means-necessary help? Would Lynch’s tarmac idea have trumped Comey’s phony investigation? Would Glen Simpson now be White House press secretary, James Comey Clinton’s CIA director; would Andrew McCabe be Comey’s replacement at the FBI?


In reductionist terms, every single scandal that has so far surfaced at the FBI and DOJ share a common catalyst. What now appears clearly unethical and probably illegal would have passed as normal in a likely 16-year Obama-Clinton progressive continuum. A final paradox: Why did so many federal officials and officeholders act so unethically and likely illegally when they were convinced of a Clinton landslide? Why the overkill? The answer to that paradox lies in human nature and can be explored through the hubris and nemesis of Greek tragedy — or the 1972 petty burgling of a Watergate complex apartment when Richard Nixon really was on his way to a landslide victory. Needlessly weaponizing the Obama FBI and the DOJ was akin to Hillary Clinton’s insanely campaigning in the last days of the 2016 campaign in red-state Arizona, the supposed “cherry atop a pleasing electoral map.” In short, such hubris was not just what Peter Strzok in August 2016 termed an “insurance policy” against an unlikely Trump victory. Instead, the Clinton and Obama officials believed that it was within the administrative state’s grasp and their perceived political interest not just to beat but to destroy and humiliate Donald Trump — and by extension all the distasteful deplorables and irredeemables he supposedly had galvanized.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455885/expected-clinton-victory-explains-federal-employee-wrongdoing

[Pavlov]

In short, how would a President Clinton have calibrated the many rewards for any-means-necessary help? Would Lynch’s tarmac idea have trumped Comey’s phony investigation? Would Glen Simpson now be White House press secretary, James Comey Clinton’s CIA director; would Andrew McCabe be Comey’s replacement at the FBI?:lol

[koriwhat]

Republicans want all recreational drugs to be illegal and their music is terrible. Why are you Republican?

why are you Retarded?

[Chris]

Chuck



958127913332822016

[Pavlov]

:lol @ Chris and his celebrity worship

[spurraider21]

Chuck Woolery and James Woods. Always my go-to sources for political takes

[Chris]

Chuck Woolery and James Woods. Always my go-to sources for political takes

I bet you're a John Oliver guy. Stephen Colbert?

[koriwhat]

I bet you're a John Oliver guy. Stephen Colbert?

watch these hacks try to wiggle out of that question...

[Blake]

Lolllllllll chuck woolery?

[Blake]

I bet you're a John Oliver guy. Stephen Colbert?

Lolllllllll chuck woolery guy

[TSA]

Internal Justice Department probe eyes McCabe’s role in final weeks of 2016 election

The Justice Department’s inspector general has been focused for months on why Andrew McCabe, as the No. 2 official at the FBI, appeared not to act for about three weeks on a request to examine a batch of Hillary Clinton-related emails found in the latter stages of the 2016 election campaign, according to people familiar with the matter.

The inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, has been asking witnesses why FBI leadership seemed unwilling to move forward on the examination of emails found on the laptop of former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) until late October — about three weeks after first being alerted to the issue, according to these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

A key question of the internal investigation is whether McCabe or anyone else at the FBI wanted to avoid taking action on the laptop findings until after the Nov. 8 election, these people said. It is unclear whether the inspector general has reached any conclusions on that point.

A major line of inquiry for the inspector general has been trying to determine who at the FBI and the Justice Department knew about the Clinton emails on the Weiner laptop, and when they learned about them. McCabe is a central figure in those inquiries, these people said.

The FBI declined to comment, as did a spokesman for the inspector general. An attorney for McCabe did not respond to a request for comment.

On Monday, McCabe left the FBI, following a meeting with FBI Director Christopher A. Wray in which they discussed the inspector general’s investigation, according to people familiar with the matter. Horowitz announced in January 2017 that he was examining the Justice Department’s handling of the Clinton investigation. His report is expected in the spring.

The Justice Department’s inspector general has been focused for months on why Andrew McCabe, as the No. 2 official at the FBI, appeared not to act for about three weeks on a request to examine a batch of Hillary Clinton-related emails found in the latter stages of the 2016 election campaign, according to people familiar with the matter.

The inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, has been asking witnesses why FBI leadership seemed unwilling to move forward on the examination of emails found on the laptop of former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) until late October — about three weeks after first being alerted to the issue, according to these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

A key question of the internal investigation is whether McCabe or anyone else at the FBI wanted to avoid taking action on the laptop findings until after the Nov. 8 election, these people said. It is unclear whether the inspector general has reached any conclusions on that point.

A major line of inquiry for the inspector general has been trying to determine who at the FBI and the Justice Department knew about the Clinton emails on the Weiner laptop, and when they learned about them. McCabe is a central figure in those inquiries, these people said.

The FBI declined to comment, as did a spokesman for the inspector general. An attorney for McCabe did not respond to a request for comment.

Andrew McCabe, who has faced repeated criticism from President Trump, is stepping down as deputy director of the FBI and will formally retire in March. (Elyse Samuels, Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

On Monday, McCabe left the FBI, following a meeting with FBI Director Christopher A. Wray in which they discussed the inspector general’s investigation, according to people familiar with the matter. Horowitz announced in January 2017 that he was examining the Justice Department’s handling of the Clinton investigation. His report is expected in the spring.

[How a classified four-page Russia memo set off a political firestorm]

The matter of the Weiner laptop emails has been debated publicly for more than a year, in part because many Clinton supporters say the FBI tilted the 2016 race toward Donald Trump when it announced in late October that it was reopening its probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server when she served as secretary of state.

Key parts of what went into that decision have remained murky and are a major focus of the inspector general’s probe, according to people familiar with the matter.

In late September 2016, FBI agents in New York were investigating Weiner for possible Internet crimes involving a teenage girl. In the course of that probe, they discovered that his laptop contained thousands of work emails belonging to Weiner’s then-wife, Huma Abedin. Abedin was a longtime aide to Clinton, and agents wanted to know whether the emails in question might shed new light on the Clinton investigation, which had been closed in July without any charges.

The New York FBI office alerted FBI headquarters to the new email issue within days — accounts differ as to when precisely, but McCabe was aware of the matter by late September or early October at the latest, according to the people familiar with the matter. The agents on the Weiner case wanted to talk to the Clinton email investigators and see whether the messages were potentially important. Some people familiar with the matter said officials at FBI headquarters asked the New York agents to analyze the emails’ metadata — the sender, recipient and times of the messages — to see whether they seemed relevant to the closed probe.

McCabe was involved in those discussions, but there are differing accounts about how much then-FBI Director James B. Comey understood about the matter in the early days of October.

An attorney for Comey could not immediately be reached for comment.

Some people involved at the time said Comey learned of the issue around the same time as McCabe. Others contend Comey did not know about it until weeks later. Senior Justice Department officials, according to several people familiar with the issue, were not notified until mid-October.

But for a period of at least three weeks, according to people involved at the time, nothing much happened — a lag that has sparked the inspector general’s questions.

McCabe’s defenders in law enforcement say that there was nothing nefarious going on — officials were pursuing a careful process of determining whether the emails might be relevant, and that took time.

Other law enforcement officials, however, have said they are concerned that the issue seemed to die for a period of time at McCabe’s desk, without explanation.

On Oct. 24, 2016, the Wall Street Journal reported that McCabe’s wife had received hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from a close ally of Clinton, then-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe. The donations were for McCabe’s wife’s unsuccessful run as a Democrat for the Virginia state legislature.

The dormant laptop issue then appeared to gain new attention inside the FBI and Justice Department. At a meeting of senior officials of both agencies, senior Justice Department official George Toscas asked about the status of the inquiry into the emails on Weiner’s laptop, according to people familiar with the matter.

At the same time, the FBI was facing a new set of questions, this time about McCabe’s role in a stalled probe into the Clinton Foundation. Some within the FBI felt McCabe had repeatedly moved to hamstring that probe and were suspicious of his motives for doing so, according to people familiar with the matter.

McCabe’s defenders inside federal law enforcement have repeatedly said he tried to navigate a sensitive political investigation between Justice Department officials who thought the probe was going nowhere and FBI agents who believed they were being blocked from issuing subpoenas and taking other steps that could uncover critical evidence.

In the midst of fielding questions on that subject, Comey decided on Oct. 28 to notify Congress by letter that he was reopening the Clinton email investigation to see whether the Weiner laptop provided new evidence. In that letter, Comey said he received a formal briefing on the laptop issue a day earlier. The following week, Comey sent a second letter saying that the emails in question did not change the FBI’s conclusions about the Clinton case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/internal-justice-department-probe-eyes-mccabes-role-in-final-weeks-of-2016-election/2018/01/30/db2ea8f0-05c7-11e8-8777-2a059f168dd2_story.html?utm_term=.10cca4628ff0

[spurraider21]

I bet you're a John Oliver guy. Stephen Colbert?
i like john oliver, but in fairness his show cites sources for just about every claim made unlike chuck or james

i was never a colbert report fan, nor do i watch the late show

[Pavlov]

I bet you're a John Oliver guy. Stephen Colbert?


watch these hacks try to wiggle out of that question...Neither. They're comedians.

[koriwhat]

fuck celebs but i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert, whose own ear is trying to run away from that shit DNC mouthpiece, and oliver, a dipshit brit living it up in USA instead of his own GREAT nation.

[Chris]

fuck celebs but i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert, whose own ear is trying to run away from that shit DNC mouthpiece, and oliver, a dipshit brit living it up in USA instead of his own GREAT nation.

Don't forget Cryin' Kimmel.

[Pavlov]

fuck celebs but i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert, whose own ear is trying to run away from that shit DNC mouthpiece, and oliver, a dipshit brit living it up in USA instead of his own GREAT nation.So your celebrities good.

[Blake]

fuck celebs but i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert, whose own ear is trying to run away from that shit DNC mouthpiece, and oliver, a dipshit brit living it up in USA instead of his own GREAT nation.

Of course because woolery is republican like you

[koriwhat]

Don't forget Cryin' Kimmel.

who could ever forget that misogynist feminist? fuck that crybaby sob.


So your celebrities good.

this is hilarious. who's celebrities? "i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert...and oliver" your reading comprehension skills blows balls just like your dipshit shtick of round about questions.

[Pavlov]

this is hilarious. who's celebrities? "i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert...and oliver" your reading comprehension skills blows balls just like your dipshit shtick of round about questions.Your celebrity good.

[koriwhat]

Of course because woolery is republican like you

you and pav... smh

i don't follow nor keep up with woolery not even .01%... if given the choice though, fuck colbert, fuck oliver, fuck kimmel, and the rest of them sissys.

[koriwhat]

Your celebrity good.

you're a fucking retard pav. plain and simple.

[spurraider21]

guys i dont like democrat celebs, i only like republican celebs!

but fuck both sides!

[Chris]

you and pav... smh

i don't follow nor keep up with woolery not even .01%... if given the choice though, fuck colbert, fuck oliver, fuck kimmel, and the rest of them sissys.

They get paid to regurgitate Radical Socialist doctrine. Traitors to our beloved Republic. SAD!

[Pavlov]

They get paid to regurgitate Radical Socialist doctrine. Traitors to our beloved Republic. lol another conspiracy

[koriwhat]

guys i dont like democrat celebs, i only like republican celebs!

but fuck both sides!

good for you. you and pav both have shitty reading comprehension skills. nice!

[boutons_deux]

The Nunes Conspiracy Theory

The impossibly tangled web behind these bogus accusations.

such an allegation, if true, would require a vast number of people—across two branches of government—to be on board and willing to put their careers on the line for a conspiracy.


1. When Did the FBI Open an Investigation on Carter Page?

THE TAKEAWAY:

If the Nunes memo does not indicate when the investigation underlying the Page FISA application was opened or how many months/years of investigative activity it included preceding the dossier, it is not telling a complete or accurate story.


2. Who in the DOJ Conducted the Woods Procedures on the FISA Application?

THE TAKEAWAY:

If the Nunes memo doesn’t address who conducted the Woods procedures for the Page FISA application, any material deficiencies in those procedures, or address this part of the DOJ review process at all, it is skipping over a critical part of the vetting process.


3. Who Was the Federal Judge Who Approved the Memo?

THE TAKEAWAY:

Alleging a concerted conspiracy by the FBI/DOJ in obtaining the Page FISA

necessarily implicates the judge who approved it and suggests they are incompetent (at best) or corrupt (at worst).

If Nunes is alleging serious crimes on the part of the FBI and DOJ, he must put his money where his mouth is and identify the judge who approved the FISA application. If he doesn’t, it’s likely because even he knows that his accusations don’t have any solid basis.


4. Was the FISA Warrant Ever Extended?
THE TAKEAWAY:

Neither the FBI nor the DOJ has the power to extend a FISA surveillance order; they must request it. If a request to extend FISA surveillance that began in September 2016 was made by Rosenstein in or around March 2017, the FBI had shown a federal judge that it had collected additional foreign intelligence information justifying the original order at least once already, around December 2016. The Nunes memo should address the fact that additional information validating the original FISA order was obtained and reviewed and approved by a (potentially additional) federal judge, in addition to new administration staff at the DOJ.


5. Has Robert Mueller Used Anything Derived From the FISA in His Investigation?

THE TAKEAWAY:

Anything that discredits the Page FISA application by definition is intended to cast doubt on the Mueller investigation. This may also be an attempted implication of the Nunes memo if it tries to tar Rosenstein, as each major step that has been taken by Mueller has been approved by Rosenstein (https://www.justsecurity.org/49847/its-worse-trump-fire-rosenstein-fire-mueller/). If this is the case, then Mueller should be named directly in the memo as someone who has personally engaged in misconduct in reliance on the Page warrant. If he is not, it is because

Nunes knows that this is a line he cannot politically cross directly without real evidence—and is trying to do so indirectly.

In sum,

the Nunes memo reportedly

alleges that at least a dozen FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors fabricated evidence,

engaged in a criminal conspiracy to commit perjury,

lucked out on being randomly assigned Judge Low Blood Sugar who looked the other way, and—coincidentally—

ended up obtaining evidence that justified extending the initial FISA surveillance.

This conspiracy was presumably signed off on by former FBI Director James Comey—

who, while conspiring to bring down Trump, actually shifted the election in his favor by informing Congress he had reopened the Hillary Clinton email investigation one month after the Page FISA warrant.

The sham FISA was validated by one or more federal judges who either didn’t know better or were in on the whole secret,

and later accepted and used by special counsel Mueller who was not a part of the FBI during this time at all. And despite this widespread and outrageous conduct,

the current assistant attorney general, a Trump appointee, wrote (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/24/doj-official-urges-nunes-not-to-release-memo-on-surveillance-abuses.html) Nunes about the memo to say, “we are currently unaware of any wrongdoing relating to the FISA process.”

If Nunes has in fact single-handedly uncovered this vast criminal enterprise, it’s hard to know what’s more astonishing:

that a government bureaucracy managed to pull it off—or

that Nunes has exposed it all in a scant four-page memo.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/01/the-nunes-conspiracy-theory.html

[spurraider21]

good for you. you and pav both have shitty reading comprehension skills. nice!
why would you prefer chuck woolery's political statements any day to those other guys?

[Reck]

fuck celebs but i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert, whose own ear is trying to run away from that shit DNC mouthpiece, and oliver, a dipshit brit living it up in USA instead of his own GREAT nation.

Oh look the non republican takes another stance on where his views lies.

Fuck celebs but I'll listen to Woolery all day.

Fuck Trump but I'll defend him till I die.

:lmao

[TSA]

958479220061147140

[koriwhat]

why would you prefer chuck woolery's political statements any day to those other guys?

i don't prefer any of them. that's why i don't follow any on twitter nor watch any on tv. i don't keep up with any of them.

why would you lend an ear to either colbert or oliver? why?

[Pavlov]

958479220061147140sundance?

[spurraider21]

fuck celebs but i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert, whose own ear is trying to run away from that shit DNC mouthpiece, and oliver, a dipshit brit living it up in USA instead of his own GREAT nation.
so why do you prefer woolery to democrat celebrities?

i don't prefer any of them. that's why i don't follow any on twitter nor watch any on tv. i don't keep up with any of them.

why would you lend an ear to either colbert or oliver? why?
i dont watch colbert. i lend an ear to oliver's show because it tends to be informative and well sourced. plus he's funny

[koriwhat]

Oh look the non republican takes another stance on where his views lies.

Fuck celebs but I'll listen to Woolery all day.

Fuck Trump but I'll defend him till I die.

:lmao

wrong on everything tranny.

this is what should had been said by you but your bias is so far out there and so is your "gender".

Fuck celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day over Colbert or Oliver if I had to.

Fuck Trump but I'll defend anyone against a mob of losers who think they know better, have a heard mentality, act on pure hatred, and let their emotions control their actions without facts/truth to back up their far left bias.

[Pavlov]

Oh look the non republican takes another stance on where his views lies.

Fuck celebs but I'll listen to Woolery all day.

Fuck Trump but I'll defend him till I die.

:lmao

Fuck celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day

Fuck Trump but I'll defend
Welp.

[koriwhat]

so why do you prefer woolery to democrat celebrities?

well fuck, you want me to list them all? fuck that. i love dave chappelle and he voted for that **** HRC.

as well, i caught an episode of the view today and those women are enough to throw my hands up and claim your whole party fucking sucks. if that's the bar, those old hags, then fuck the left altogether. i still believe in real liberals but i have a hard time running into them these days and instead a bunch of psychos took over their party.

[koriwhat]

Welp.

you want to look more and more like a biased far left loon or what? making the case pretty easy i see.

why'd you take my quote out of context dipshit?

this is what you quoted but...
"Fuck celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day"

this is what i stated. hmmm...
"Fuck celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day over Colbert or Oliver if I had to."

[koriwhat]

lets play your game pav.

why did you quote me out of context?

[Pavlov]

you want to look more and more like a biased far left loon or what? making the case pretty easy i see.

why'd you take my quote out of context dipshit?

this is what you quoted but...
"Fuck celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day"

this is what i stated. hmmm...
"Fuck celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day over Colbert or Oliver if I had to."So, fuck celebs except the ones like Woolery whom you would listen to all day under the right circumstances.

[Pavlov]

lets play your game pav.

why did you quote me out of context?For this kind of response.

Everyone can see all the quotes.

[Reck]

wrong on everything tranny.

this is what should had been said by you but your bias is so far out there and so is your "gender".

Fuck celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day over Colbert or Oliver if I had to.

Fuck Trump but I'll defend anyone against a mob of losers who think they know better, have a heard mentality, act on pure hatred, and let their emotions control their actions without facts/truth to back up their far left bias.

:lol You just described what you do on a daily basis here. :lol

You meltdown more often than Wild Cobra ever did. And that's saying something, tats.

[boutons_deux]

Fusion GPS Lawyers Blast Sen. Chuck Grassley For ‘Knowingly’ Endangering Lives of Firm’s Staffers

Lawyers for Fusion GPS slammed Sen. Chuck Grassley for endangering the lives of the firm’s employees after the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee made public a letter identifying a number of its staffers.

In a response sent to Grassley, the Fusion GPS lawyers blasted the senator — as well as his colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham —

for revealing the names of Fusion GPS employees,

“even after we had requested – in writing – that the names of employees not be disclosed to the public because of well-founded concerns about their public safety.”

“We have explained to your staff on multiple occasions that Fusion GPS has received threats to its company, its property and its employees, and that counsel has reported these matters twice to the police,” the Fusion GPS lawyers wrote.

“Ignoring our requests, your office knowingly put these people in danger, by releasing their names,” the lawyers wrote. “These leaks are unauthorized and unethical.”

https://www.mediaite.com/online/fusion-gps-lawyers-blast-sen-chuck-grassley-for-knowingly-endangering-lives-of-firms-staffers/

[koriwhat]

So, fuck celebs except the ones like Woolery whom you would listen to all day under the right circumstances.

why do you think i'd listen to woolery in the first place??

[koriwhat]

For this kind of response.

Everyone can see all the quotes.

so why'd you take my words out of context and shorten the actual quote to fit your narrative?

[koriwhat]

Fusion GPS Lawyers Blast Sen. Chuck Grassley For ‘Knowingly’ Endangering Lives of Firm’s Staffers

Lawyers for Fusion GPS slammed Sen. Chuck Grassley for endangering the lives of the firm’s employees after the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee made public a letter identifying a number of its staffers.

In a response sent to Grassley, the Fusion GPS lawyers blasted the senator — as well as his colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham —

for revealing the names of Fusion GPS employees,

“even after we had requested – in writing – that the names of employees not be disclosed to the public because of well-founded concerns about their public safety.”

“We have explained to your staff on multiple occasions that Fusion GPS has received threats to its company, its property and its employees, and that counsel has reported these matters twice to the police,” the Fusion GPS lawyers wrote.

“Ignoring our requests, your office knowingly put these people in danger, by releasing their names,” the lawyers wrote. “These leaks are unauthorized and unethical.”

https://www.mediaite.com/online/fusion-gps-lawyers-blast-sen-chuck-grassley-for-knowingly-endangering-lives-of-firms-staffers/




i hope that fusionGPS and its staffers all find there way under 6ft of dirt asap. fuck fusionGPS & their staffers. boohoo fake news!

[spurraider21]

well fuck, you want me to list them all? fuck that. i love dave chappelle and he voted for that **** HRC.

as well, i caught an episode of the view today and those women are enough to throw my hands up and claim your whole party fucking sucks. if that's the bar, those old hags, then fuck the left altogether. i still believe in real liberals but i have a hard time running into them these days and instead a bunch of psychos took over their party.
we've already established that what you call "real liberalism" is actually just conservatism :lol

[Pavlov]

so why'd you take my words out of context and shorten the actual quote to fit your narrative?For this kind of response.

Everyone can see all the quotes.

[koriwhat]

:lol You just described what you do on a daily basis here. :lol

You meltdown more often than Wild Cobra ever did. And that's saying something, tats.

go suck another dick you wannabe chick.

[Pavlov]

why do you think i'd listen to woolery in the first place??Because you said you would listen to him all day under that right circumstances.

[koriwhat]

we've already established that what you call "real liberalism" is actually just conservatism :lol

lmao

[koriwhat]

Because you said you would listen to him all day under that right circumstances.

and why wouldn't i listen to colbert or oliver?

[spurraider21]

lmao
i know, it was funny then too :lol

[DisAsTerBot]

go suck another dick you wannabe chick.

lol calls reck a tranny but complains about herd mentality and letting emotions control their actions without facts
Unreal

[Pavlov]

and why wouldn't i listen to colbert or oliver?Because you're a Republican.

[koriwhat]

lol calls reck a tranny but complains about herd mentality and letting emotions control their actions without facts
Unreal

lmao... so many emotions, so little time. i call him tranny because fuck him.

[koriwhat]

Because you're a Republican.

why do you insist i'm a republican pav?

[Pavlov]

why do you insist i'm a republican pav?Call 'em like I see 'em.

[koriwhat]

Call 'em like I see 'em.

why not back those opinions up with facts pav?

[Pavlov]

why not back those opinions up with facts pav?You pretty much support every Republican politician and Republican position here. I'm sure there are exceptions but it's enough to make the call.

[koriwhat]

You pretty much support every Republican politician and Republican position here. I'm sure there are exceptions but it's enough to make the call.

you'll believe whatever your bias dictates you to. why is that pav?

[Pavlov]

you'll believe whatever your bias dictates you to. why is that pav?I go by the evidence. You're free to try to change my opinion if it's important to you. You're not doing a good job so far.

[koriwhat]

I go by the evidence. You're free to try to change my opinion if it's important to you. You're not doing a good job so far.

what evidence do you reference exactly?

[Pavlov]

what evidence do you reference exactly?Your posts in the political forum.

[koriwhat]

Your posts in the political forum.

which posts would those be exactly?

[Pavlov]

which posts would those be exactly?There are dozens. Maybe hundreds. I'm not the only one who has pointed this out. Would you like for me to let you know when a post provides such evidence going forward?

[koriwhat]

There are dozens. Maybe hundreds. I'm not the only one who has pointed this out. Would you like for me to let you know when a post provides such evidence going forward?

no, i'd like you to provide evidence now, like you demand always, if you're up to it. are you up to proving your stance?

[Pavlov]

no, i'd like you to provide evidence now, like you demand always, if you're up to it. are you up to proving your stance?You should look back at all the times people say you're a Republican after you post something. Shouldn't take you long if you're up to it and if it's as important to you as your line of questioning suggests. That is the evidence.

[koriwhat]

You should look back at all the times people say you're a Republican after you post something. Shouldn't take you long if you're up to it and if it's as important to you as your line of questioning suggests. That is the evidence.

pav, this is on you to prove. i don't give a shit what those losers call me. so with that said, are you going to provide proof or just sit on your ass like always and hope others do the leg work for you?

[Pavlov]

pav, this is on you to prove. i don't give a shit what those losers call me. so with that said, are you going to provide proof or just sit on your ass like always and hope others do the leg work for you?To prove my opinion?

lol

It just happened today. Someone said you're a Republican.

Do you remember that?

[koriwhat]

To prove my opinion?

lol

It just happened today. Someone said you're a Republican.

Do you remember that?

i don't need to remember anything tbh. prove it to me pav! this is what you do daily and i'm not going to stop this now so where's your proof?

[Pavlov]

i don't need to remember anything tbh. prove it to me pav! this is what you do daily and i'm not going to stop this now so where's your proof?It just happened today.

The proof is in today's posts.

That posts you already read and responded to.

[koriwhat]

It just happened today.

The proof is in today's posts.

That posts you already read and responded to.

which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?

[Pavlov]

which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?You already read and replied to them today.

Mere hours ago.

Do you seriously not remember what you did today?

Yes or no.

[koriwhat]

You already read and replied to them today.

Mere hours ago.

Do you seriously not remember what you did today?

Yes or no.

i remember plenty but refresh my memory pav. which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?

[koriwhat]

do you not want to prove your stance pav?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

i remember plenty but refresh my memory pav. which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?You didn't answer yes or no.

Do you remember what you did today?

Yes or no.

[koriwhat]

You didn't answer yes or no.

Do you remember what you did today?

Yes or no.

i remember plenty pav. with that said, which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?

[Pavlov]

i remember plenty pav. with that said, which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?You didn't answer yes or no.

Do you remember what you did today?

Yes or no.

Don't dodge the question.

[koriwhat]

You didn't answer yes or no.

Do you remember what you did today?

Yes or no.

Don't dodge the question.

sure, yes i remember but refresh my memory pav. which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?

[Pavlov]

sure, yesOK, no need for me to tell you what you did then.

Glad we got that settled.

[TSA]

“The FBI is intimately familiar with ‘material omissions’ with respect to their presentations to both Congress and the courts, and they are welcome to make public, to the greatest extent possible, all the information they have on these abuses,” said Nunes, a member of Trump’s transition team. “Regardless, it’s clear that top officials used unverified information in a court document to fuel a counter-intelligence investigation during an American political campaign. Once the truth gets out, we can begin taking steps to ensure our intelligence agencies and courts are never misused like this again.”

[Pavlov]

lol Nunes

[TSA]

958860327323660289

[Pavlov]

958860327323660289Another conspiracy!

How many is this total, TSA?

[TSA]

The Memo Freakout

January 31, 2018 6:04 PM

Donald Trump’s critics have moved beyond latter-day Cold Warrior mode into full blown McCarthyism. John Heilemann of MSNBC has taken to insinuating that Republican Devin Nunes, chairman of the House intelligence committee, might be a Russian plant. The congressman’s offense is producing and working to release a memo about the sources of the FBI’s surveillance of persons associated with the Trump campaign in 2016, which has made Nunes the most hated man in Washington for Democrats and the press.

The memo is portrayed as a blatant PR gimmick and a clear and present danger to America’s intelligence operations. But from what we know of Nunes and his colleagues, they have long been sincerely alarmed at what they’ve learned about how the FBI operated in 2016. The suspicions have been heightened by the bizarre stonewalling of the committee’s inquiry by a Republican-led Justice department (this background accounts for why the committee hasn’t worked closely with the DOJ on the memo).

As for endangering U.S. intelligence, the committee has scrupulously followed the process to declassify the document in such circumstances. Nunes or someone else could have simply leaked the document to a sympathetic reporter — this is how Washington usually works — but he has instead played by the rules. The White House is, per chief of staff John Kelly, currently scrubbing the document, and presumably anything that reveals sources and methods will be redacted.

We can’t know if the document is nearly as explosive as advertised until we see it. Perhaps the presuppositions of the committee Republicans have led them to an overly hostile interpretation of the material. (The FBI is already out with a statement saying that the memo leaves out important details.) But you don’t have to be Sean Hannity to be curious about the beginning of the investigation and its conduct, given the disturbing revelations of the last few months.

At the outset of all this, we favored a full investigation of the 2016 election controversies — from the Russian hacking to unmasking — to give the public as many facts as possible. Instead, the main investigation is taking place within the black box of a special-counsel probe. If nothing else, the Nunes memo will pull back the curtain on part of the story. The FBI and the Democrats can — and should — share their own versions. This is called public debate, and we assure the Red Hunters on the Left that this is not how the Kremlin conducts its affairs.

http://amp.nationalreview.com/article/455988/devin-nunes-memo-freakout-media-overblown?utm_source=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_medium=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&utm_campaign=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&__twitter_impression=true

[Pavlov]

At the outset of all this, we favored a full investigation of the 2016 election controversies — from the Russian hacking to unmasking — to give the public as many facts as possible. Instead, the main investigation is taking place within the black box of a special-counsel probe. That's Trump's fault.

Too bad for him.

And what is Nunes doing to investigate the Russian hacking, TSA?

And why would Trump promise to release the memo without even reading it?

[Reck]

That's Trump's fault.

Too bad for him.

And what is Nunes doing to investigate the Russian hacking, TSA?

And why would Trump promise to release the memo without even reading it?

He still hasn't answer that? TSA stop being a faggot and answer the man.

[Pavlov]

He still hasn't answer that? TSA stop being a faggot and answer the man.
It's his own cover up.

[Reck]

Looks like two can play that game. :lol

958780001884786688

[Chris]

Every mornin' at the mine you could see him arrive
He stood six-foot-six and weighed two-forty-five
Kinda broad at the shoulder and narrow at the hip
And everybody knew ya didn't give no lip to big Ron :lol

[boutons_deux]

And why would Trump promise to release the memo without even reading it?

I'm pretty sure the WH, including Trash, has read the memo, in collusion with Nunes.

Repugs proving they care about and know how to govern.

[CosmicCowboy]

Lol @ blue team shitting their pants over the memos release.

[Pavlov]

lol @ CC buying into muh memo.

[CosmicCowboy]

lol @ CC buying into muh memo.

I haven't read it yet. What are you scared of?

[Pavlov]

I haven't read it yet. What are you scared of?Straw man. Nothing in my posts has expressed any fear of it at all.

I'll ask you -- why a staffer memo, CC? Why not a committee report like committees have made since committees began?

[CosmicCowboy]

I am totally OK with a summary and the FBI and Justice Department are free to refute it.

[CosmicCowboy]

I personally think the Obama Justice Department was politically corrupt going back at least to fast and furious.

I can also understand why blue team doesnt want to admit it.

[CosmicCowboy]

"Lets give the cartels guns from US gun dealers so we can prove the Cartel gets guns from US gun dealers so we can advocate for stricter gun laws"

"Oh shit!" They used one of our guns to kill US border patrol agents. Lets cover it up!

[boutons_deux]

The entire Repug party is corrupt, rotten for colluding with Trash's mafiya to trash the FBI and shutdown Mueller

They know Trash and mafiya are multiply guilty

[CosmicCowboy]

I'm sane. Everyone else is crazy

[Pavlov]

I am totally OK with a summary and the FBI and Justice Department are free to refute it.


I personally think the Obama Justice Department was politically corrupt going back at least to fast and furious.

I can also understand why blue team doesnt want to admit it.


"Lets give the cartels guns from US gun dealers so we can prove the Cartel gets guns from US gun dealers so we can advocate for stricter gun laws"

"Oh shit!" They used one of our guns to kill US border patrol agents. Lets cover it up!Yeah, you didn't answer the question.

Don't feel bad -- no Trump supporter can.

[CosmicCowboy]

Yeah, you didn't answer the question.

Don't feel bad -- no Trump supporter can.

I answered you question. Whynot a summary? I admit hundreds of pages of raw data would be more ilkuminating but then you would quibble about classified redactions.

[TSA]

959094727021821952

https://media.giphy.com/media/xkXTQonH7CIMg/giphy.gif

[Pavlov]

I answered you question. Whynot a summary? I admit hundreds of pages of raw data would be more ilkuminating but then you would quibble about classified redactions.:lol There are already redactions in the four page memo.

[CosmicCowboy]

:lol There are already redactions in the four page memo.

So why is blue team afraid it will be released?

[Pavlov]

So why is blue team afraid it will be released?Probably because it's full of shit and designed solely to discredit any investigation into Trump and his minions.

It's hilarious that you can't see what's going on here. You're very easily manipulated.

[CosmicCowboy]

Probably because it's full of shit and designed solely to discredit any investigation into Trump and his minions.

It's hilarious that you can't see what's going on here. You're very easily manipulated.
You have read it?

Lmao @ Chump. Go Blue team!

[Pavlov]

You have read it?I've heard Red Team talking about it incessantly.

Have you heard anyone on Red Team ever talk about it CC?

[TSA]

959099700963168256

[TSA]

Positioning over the Nunes FISA Memo Continues Ahead of Its Release

The FBI and Democrats don’t have good reasons for wanting to prevent its disclosure to the public.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/456003/devin-nunes-fisa-memo-positioning-ahead-its-release

[boutons_deux]

Positioning over the Nunes FISA Memo Continues Ahead of Its Release

The FBI and Democrats don’t have good reasons for wanting to prevent its disclosure to the public.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/456003/devin-nunes-fisa-memo-positioning-ahead-its-release

One big Dem reason is that Nunes has blocked any Dem retort, since he knows his memo is weak, lying bullshit

[TSA]

One big Dem reason is that Nunes has blocked any Dem retort, since he knows his memo is weak, lying bullshit

Nunes didn't block any Dem retort stop pushing Schiff's lies. The transcript was released.

[TSA]

959124806959554561

959152378359504896

[Chris]

Mueller and his goons begging for redactions so they won't be implicated. When the Schiff hits the fan...

[boutons_deux]

959124806959554561

959152378359504896

no, asshole, "the first problem" was that the memo would expose NatSec info.

[TSA]

959151540702359552

[hater]

:lmao this is a jothingburger in the nd fellas

Noone is listening anyway they just talking

[Pavlov]

959124806959554561

959152378359504896


Mueller and his goons begging for redactions so they won't be implicated. When the Schiff hits the fan...Mueller has nothing to do with this.

Why are you guys trying to bash Trump's guy Wray?