Oh, so this is what a nothingburger looks like!

[djohn2oo8]

959613118438629376
lol

[monosylab1k]

Nunes sez he's now moved to Phase 2

:lmao Nunes treating his accusations of treason like it’s a Marvel movie universe.

Part One was so poorly received that he had to improv on the fly “no no no hahaha you guys thought this was it? Of course not uhhhhh I have more memos, brb gotta find a pencil!”

[Spurtacular]

959521687690596352

Mono posting outdated children's videos in lieu of salient points. :lol

[Green Man]

Mono posting outdated children's videos in lieu of salient points. :lol
Not my troll, doggie. And if it was you wouldn’t be worthy of it. You only get replies from dumpster-tier mono trolls.

[Spurtacular]

Not my troll, doggie. And if it was you wouldn’t be worthy of it. You only get replies from dumpster-tier mono trolls.

:lmao Can't even remember that you already claimed it.

[FlAVaK]

959613118438629376
lol

959644624477392899
959646249682112512
959629574731595776

[Green Man]

959651236034285574

[dabom]

:lol

[Reck]

959644624477392899
959646249682112512
959629574731595776

:lol That was a good find.

[Green Man]

959587882792116226

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Tranny / Slob humor I guess.

[Spurtacular]

Not my troll, doggie. And if it was you wouldn’t be worthy of it. You only get replies from dumpster-tier mono trolls.

You owned it many times over, slob. Damn you dumb.

[Reck]

^^^

Tranny / Slob humor I guess.

https://media.giphy.com/media/14O3tUgMNdPva/giphy.gif

[Reck]

You owned it many times over, slob. Damn you dumb.

:lol Thinking calling anyone slob is a witty insult.

[Green Man]

You owned it many times over, slob. Damn you dumb.
:lmao going full on Fabbs.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao going full on Fabbs.

Keep your sucking to the club, slob. TBH

[Green Man]

:lmao putting all your hopes on this guy delivering the goods
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8gyiV3U0AEEHd3.jpg

[DMX7]

Nice mullet, Nunes.

[Isitjustme?]

Mono posting outdated children's videos in lieu of salient points. :lol

Thats ben shapiro hes an intellectual giant of modern conservativism

[Brazil]

So anybody in jail already ?

no ?

what a fucking let down tbh... :depressed ... I can’t wait phase 2 tbh because phase 1 kinda suck

[djohn2oo8]

959683135607857152

[djohn2oo8]

959741091577847809

[Chris]

Yomemo jokes...just when I thought the Left couldn't get any more pathetic.

[Isitjustme?]

Yomemo jokes...just when I thought the Left couldn't get any more pathetic.

Theyre no Ben Garrison cartoons but theyll do in a pinch

[djohn2oo8]

959532126122242050

[boutons_deux]

Preet Bharara‏Verified account @PreetBharara (https://twitter.com/PreetBharara)


@PreetBharara
I mean come on when your memo is crapped on by Alberto "torture memo" Gonzales,
you're up shithole creek I think @DevinNunes (https://twitter.com/DevinNunes)

[DMC]

http://i67.tinypic.com/8yugyb.gif

That's racist.

[DMC]

People here have resorted to regurgitating tweets from people who would never be caught dead here.

[Monostradamus]

Yomemo jokes...just when I thought the Left couldn't get any more pathetic.
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqhuemZCvB1qjru53.jpg

[Will Hunting]

:cry leave Nunes alone, your jokes are really really mean :cry

[Will Hunting]

6pg pdf... -2pgs = 4pgs so where you getting 3.25 pgs at?


How much text do you see on the last page?

A full page's worth?

Less?

More?


https://i.imgur.com/jzuSmKt.png
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

[boutons_deux]

#YoMemoJokes identifies 1000s of talented, creative,intelligent, informed comedy writers

actual "comedy gold"

Even the hashtag is so clever

Nunes And Trump Humiliated Again As #YoMemoJokes Rocks Twitterhttp://www.nationalmemo.com/nunes-trump-humiliated-again-yomemojokes-rocks-twitter/

[Will Hunting]

6pg pdf... -2pgs = 4pgs so where you getting 3.25 pgs at?


How much text do you see on the last page?

A full page's worth?

Less?

More?


Typical libtard view, its a third...
https://dc596.4shared.com/img/3aNCsOevca/s24/16158f58588/1_online?async&rand=0.28309845417762025

Learn how to count...
:lmao so let me break this down...

1) calf_tats and Mikeanaro originally claimed to have read a 6 page memo while also claiming there’s a separate 99 page memo.
2) Pavlov then laughs at them for claiming there’s a 99 page memo and then says their “6 page memo” is only 3.25 pages long.
3) They quickly proceed to give up on the idea of a 99 page memo but insist the actual memo is 6 pages long.
4) Pavlov says that if you had actually read it, you would know the White House added two pages that aren’t part of the actual memo congress released.
5) Their argument is then reduced to “haha stupid libs don’t know how to count...6 - 2 is 4 pages not 3.25 pages”, ignoring the possibility that the final page isn’t a full page (something someone who read the memo would know).
6) Splits posts a picture of the 4th page showing it’s not even half filled with text.
7) Mikeanaro then pretends he never said it was 99, 6 or 4 pages long but then decides to play semantics over 1/4th of a page vs. 1/3rd of a page, stating the memo is 3.33 pages long and that Splits can’t count if he thinks it’s 3.25 pages (even though 3.25 is much closer to 3.33 than the 99 pages, 6 pages or 4 full pages calf_tats was arguing for).

Did I get that all right?

[CosmicCowboy]

Just like Chump to straw man the page count to duck and dodge the content.

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

Just like Chump to straw man the page count to duck and dodge the content.
What content?

[CosmicCowboy]

What content?
That the Steele hit piece was the reason that they got the FISA warrant to spy on an American citizen and didnt disclose the source and admitted they couldnt have gotten the warrant without it. Pretty simple really.

[djohn2oo8]

That the Steele hit piece was the reason that they got the FISA warrant to spy on an American citizen and didnt disclose the source and admitted they couldnt have gotten the warrant without it. Pretty simple really.

If you read the memo, it acknowledges George Papajohn's drunken rant is what started everything. But you didn't read it.

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

That the Steele hit piece was the reason that they got the FISA warrant to spy on an American citizen and didnt disclose the source and admitted they couldnt have gotten the warrant without it. Pretty simple really.

:lmao someone else who cried like a bitch all day yesterday when he realized Obama wasn’t getting put in handcuffs.

[CosmicCowboy]

:lmao someone else who cried like a bitch all day yesterday when he realized Obama wasn’t getting put in handcuffs.

Lol first post I've made on the subject faggot.

[CosmicCowboy]

Nice duck of the content though.

[djohn2oo8]

Nice duck of the content though.

Did you read the memo?

[CosmicCowboy]

Did you read the memo?

Yes. Can you read?

[djohn2oo8]

Yes. Can you read?

I read it. And you clearly ignored the memo admitted there was already an investigation that s not started by the dossier.

[CosmicCowboy]

I read it. And you clearly ignored the memo admitted there was already an investigation that s not started by the dossier.

So? That doesn't excuse lying to get a wiretap. That is, if you believe in the constitution.

[Mikeanaro]

:lmao so let me break this down...

1) calf_tats and Mikeanaro originally claimed to have read a 6 page memo while also claiming there’s a separate 99 page memo.
2) Pavlov then laughs at them for claiming there’s a 99 page memo and then says their “6 page memo” is only 3.25 pages long.
3) They quickly proceed to give up on the idea of a 99 page memo but insist the actual memo is 6 pages long.
4) Pavlov says that if you had actually read it, you would know the White House added two pages that aren’t part of the actual memo congress released.
5) Their argument is then reduced to “haha stupid libs don’t know how to count...6 - 2 is 4 pages not 3.25 pages”, ignoring the possibility that the final page isn’t a full page (something someone who read the memo would know).
6) Splits posts a picture of the 4th page showing it’s not even half filled with text.
7) Mikeanaro then pretends he never said it was 99, 6 or 4 pages long but then decides to play semantics over 1/4th of a page vs. 1/3rd of a page, stating the memo is 3.33 pages long and that Splits can’t count if he thinks it’s 3.25 pages (even though 3.25 is much closer to 3.33 than the 99 pages, 6 pages or 4 full pages calf_tats was arguing for).

Did I get that all right?
He said it was a 99 page memo to see if Chump was aware of the real number, Chumpster thinks its only 3.25 pages long which is highly inaccurate.
Also Chumps thinks there is no DNC involvement in the memo, no Hillary, no nothing.
So I dont know what you get right or wrong.

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

Nice duck of the content though.
What content?

[CosmicCowboy]

What if someone gave the DEA a made up report that you are a major drug dealer and they use that to show a judge to get a warrant and swat kicks your door in at midnight. Would that be OK with you? Its the same principle.

[djohn2oo8]

So? That doesn't excuse lying to get a wiretap. That is, if you believe in the constitution.

Who lied? 4 different judges found probable cause.

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

What if someone gave the DEA a made up report that you are a major drug dealer and they use that to show a judge to get a warrant and swat kicks your door in at midnight. Would that be OK with you? Its the same principle.
Except it’s not remotely the same. Holy shit, you Trumptards are shook at how poorly the memo played to the general public.

[boutons_deux]

The Dems knew what was in the #YoMemo, knew it was not legal, nothing but Nunes propaganda, and

Dems screamed wolf, national disaster loud and long about #YoMemo so the no-wolf letdown would be more severe.

[Brazil]

:lmao so let me break this down...

1) calf_tats and Mikeanaro originally claimed to have read a 6 page memo while also claiming there’s a separate 99 page memo.
2) Pavlov then laughs at them for claiming there’s a 99 page memo and then says their “6 page memo” is only 3.25 pages long.
3) They quickly proceed to give up on the idea of a 99 page memo but insist the actual memo is 6 pages long.
4) Pavlov says that if you had actually read it, you would know the White House added two pages that aren’t part of the actual memo congress released.
5) Their argument is then reduced to “haha stupid libs don’t know how to count...6 - 2 is 4 pages not 3.25 pages”, ignoring the possibility that the final page isn’t a full page (something someone who read the memo would know).
6) Splits posts a picture of the 4th page showing it’s not even half filled with text.
7) Mikeanaro then pretends he never said it was 99, 6 or 4 pages long but then decides to play semantics over 1/4th of a page vs. 1/3rd of a page, stating the memo is 3.33 pages long and that Splits can’t count if he thinks it’s 3.25 pages (even though 3.25 is much closer to 3.33 than the 99 pages, 6 pages or 4 full pages calf_tats was arguing for).

Did I get that all right?


:lmao

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

The Dems knew what was in the #YoMemo, knew it was not legal, nothing but Nunes propaganda, and

Dems screamed wolf, national disaster loud and long about #YoMemo so the no-wolf letdown would be more severe.

:lmao Trumptards getting played like a fiddle by this guy-
https://i.redd.it/wr44a1oz355z.jpg

[Mikeanaro]

Except it’s not remotely the same. Holy shit, you Trumptards are shook at how poorly the memo played to the general public.
According to who? Seth Meyers and Jimmy Kimmel?

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

:cry it’s not 1/4 of a page, it’s 1/3! :cry it’s important! :cry

[Reck]

So? That doesn't excuse lying to get a wiretap. That is, if you believe in the constitution.

Who lied and what about?

[CosmicCowboy]

Who lied? 4 different judges found probable cause.

Based on the Justice Department ommission of the fact that the Steele dossier was unsubstantiated dirt paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. They admit they could have never gotten the FISA warrant without it.

[CosmicCowboy]

I would dislike it just as much if Trump invented some bullshit to implicate Hillary of something. Its unconstitutional bullshit, but hey, GO BLUE TEAM! Right?

[Reck]

Based on the Justice Department ommission of the fact that the Steele dossier was unsubstantiated dirt paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. They admit they could have never gotten the FISA warrant without it.

Umm me thinks you need to catch up on some important reading.

A, the Steele dossier didn't triggered the Russian investigation after all. B, Steele gave substantiated evidence that was backed up with what the FBI already learned. And C, Papadopolous was the one who got the ball rolling.

Without his escapades to London to meet with that Russian dude, there would not have been an investigation. The DNC had shit to do with any of this.

[CosmicCowboy]

Umm me thinks you need to catch up on some important reading.

A, the Steele dossier didn't triggered the Russian investigation after all. B, Steele gave substantiated evidence that was backed up with what the FBI already learned. And C, Papadopolous was the one who got the ball rolling.

Without his escapades to London to meet with that Russian dude, there would not have been an investigation. The DNC had shit to do with any of this.

Learn how to read blue team. They lied to get a FISA warrant on an american citizen.thats a fact you cant run away from by changing the subject.

[Reck]

Learn how to read blue team. They lied to get a FISA warrant on an american citizen.thats a fact you cant run away from by changing the subject.

You keep saying that but you're not showing the proof to back up your claim.

What's that? No more Hannity to tell you what to think and say? Guess you'll have to wait til Monday to get your new talking points.

[CosmicCowboy]

You guys apparently dont understand what a lie by ommission is. Let me give you an analogy.

Blakes wife goes to the 7-11 and then goes to Sancho's house and fucks the shit out of him.

When she gets home Blake asks her where she has been.

Blakes wife says she went to the 7-11.

Thats a lie by omission.

[CosmicCowboy]

You keep saying that but you're not showing the proof to back up your claim.

What's that? No more Hannity to tell you what to think and say? Guess you'll have to wait til Monday to get your new talking points.

I don't watch Fox news faggot, but I am able to read with an open mind.

[Pavlov]

That the Steele hit piece was the reason that they got the FISA warrant to spy on an American citizen and didnt disclose the source and admitted they couldnt have gotten the warrant without it. Pretty simple really.That's all been addressed.

Without the supporting documents, it's all easily dismissed as bullshit.

[Pavlov]

You guys apparently dont understand what a lie by ommission is.If anywhere in the application it is said that the source is anti-Trump, it's all good.

Trouble is, we'd need to see the application to make sure.

[CosmicCowboy]

That's all been addressed.

Without the supporting documents, it's all easily dismissed as bullshit.

GO BLUE TEAM!

[Pavlov]

I don't watch Fox news faggot, but I am able to read with an open mind.Read the annotated memo in the Times. It shows how all the things Trumpistas are trying to pimp in the memo are most likely bullshit.

[Pavlov]

GO BLUE TEAM!I read things with an open mind and figured it's all bullshit.

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

GO BLUE TEAM!
:lmao keep melting down, bitch.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/ed9e4d9ca989543c167cf300de6cea37/tenor.gif?itemid=8736604

[CosmicCowboy]

I read things with an open mind and figured it's all bullshit.

Anything that doesnt support Blue teams position has to be a lie, right?

[CosmicCowboy]

The application for the FISA warrant will eventually come out and we will all know the truth then.

[Pavlov]

Anything that doesnt support Blue teams position has to be a lie, right?The mere fact you're relying on an unoffical memo from a member of the Trump transition team tells me what team you are always on.


The application for the FISA application will eventually come out and we will all know the truth then.In the meantime you will support muh Trump without question.

[CosmicCowboy]

Trumps a blowhard and I dont support everything he does but you clearly are going to be a cheerleader for blue team.

[Pavlov]

The short term goal here is to fire Rosenstein and get more of a yes man in his stead to rein in Mueller and eventually fire him. TSA just proved that in the other thread.

You'll rubber stamp that opinion too, CC.

Because GO TEAM RED!

[Pavlov]

Trumps a blowhard and I dont support everything he does but you clearly are going to be a cheerleader for blue team.Why do you rely solely on an unofficial memo from a member of the Trump transition team?

[CosmicCowboy]

Why do you rely solely on an unofficial memo from a member of the Trump transition team?

Im on my phone so cant find the quote but I believe it was McCabe that testified they couldnt have gotten the FISA warrant without the Steele dossier. Is he a liar?

[Spurminator]

The application for the FISA warrant will eventually come out and we will all know the truth then.

Team Red's talking points are already prepared regardless.

No mention of possible political motivation: "The memo is vindicated! #MAGA"
Mention of possible political motivation: "Witch hunt! Bias proven! #MAGA"

[Pavlov]

Im on my phone so cant find the quote but I believe it was McCabe that testified they couldnt have gotten the FISA warrant without the Steele dossier. Is he a liar?Report of closed testimony.

Funny how we can't see that either, isn't it?

Why are you solely and completely trusting an unofficial memo from a member of the Trump transition team, CC?

[Pavlov]

I mean come on -- the memo admits the Trump/Russia investigation started before Carter Page. So why would anyone think the FBI wouldn't look into a guy who was no longer on the Trump campaign but already had been the subject of a FISA warrant for his Russian contacts only two years before?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

So? That doesn't excuse lying to get a wiretap. That is, if you believe in the constitution.

What lies? The end of memo clearly states that Papadopoulos was probable cause for the warrant.

And you seem to fail to understand the difference between bias and a lie. Not surprising. It is quite obvious you are regurgitating another's take.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Thinking calling anyone slob is a witty insult.

Jealous? You could be tranny slob if you want. We all figure you're that kind of a tranny, anyways. :lol

[Blake]

Yomemo jokes...just when I thought the Left couldn't get any more pathetic.

:lol that's incredibly rich

[TSA]

The mere fact you're relying on an unoffical memo from a member of the Trump transition team tells me what team you are always on.
meanwhile read this article from the NYT :rollin

[Spurtacular]

Heads rolling. Chumpettes call this a nothing burger. :lmao

[Pavlov]

meanwhile read this article from the NYT :rollin

Actually the annotated memo has commentary from FISA experts you will never read or admit to reading since they take another direct shit on your narrative.

[Blake]

Heads rolling. Chumpettes call this a nothing burger. :lmao

Whose heads?

[Spurtacular]

Whose heads?

Deputy FBI director for one.

[Blake]

Deputy FBI director for one.

The guy that was gonna retire from the fbi this year any way.

Trump pushing hard on McCabe could ultimately backfire in an obstruction case

[Blake]

What other heads are rolling?

[Spurtacular]

The guy that was gonna retire from the fbi this year any way.

Trump pushing hard on McCabe could ultimately backfire in an obstruction case

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

The guy that was gonna retire from the fbi this year any way.

Trump pushing hard on McCabe could ultimately backfire in an obstruction case

Not what it is, bro.

[Blake]

:lmao

:lmao heads rolling

[Blake]

Not what it is, bro.

Not yet

[Spurtacular]

Not yet

Then your point was shit. FBM getting exposed.

[Pavlov]

:lmao heads rollingDerptacular's point is shit.

[Blake]

Derptacular's point is shit.

Figured

[Pavlov]

Based on the Justice Department ommission of the fact that the Steele dossier was unsubstantiated dirt paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. They admit they could have never gotten the FISA warrant without it.959641575742758913It took one day to destroy all your team's conspiracies.

[TSA]

959641575742758913It took one day to destroy all your team's conspiracies.

When the first sentence of the referenced article stomps on your dick :lmao

“The court that approved surveillance of a former campaign adviser to President Trump was aware that some of the information underpinning the warrant request was paid for by a political entity, although the application did not specifically name the Democratic National Committee or the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the matter.”

[TSA]

:rollin

[TSA]

:lmao

[Pavlov]

When the first sentence of the referenced article stomps on your dick :lmao

“The court that approved surveillance of a former campaign adviser to President Trump was aware that some of the information underpinning the warrant request was paid for by a political entity, although the application did not specifically name the Democratic National Committee or the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the matter.”You think four Republican FISA judges couldn't figure out it was an entity opposed to Trump?

:rollin

Not everyone is as stupid as you, TSA.

[Pavlov]

The last sentence in the third excerpt is the final nail in your narrative's coffin.

Will you post that, TSA?

Thanks in advance.

[djohn2oo8]

959943051912400897

[djohn2oo8]

959943051912400897

Another dossier theory shot down

https://media1.tenor.com/images/3cee8b29ea1bccebddecf6d2820f6d35/tenor.gif?itemid=5921938

[Pavlov]

Here's what TSA left out.

Aw, the brave patriot left something out -- just like Nunes.


Redacting the names of U.S. people or organizations who aren’t the subject of an investigation is a common practice in government legal filings, designed to protect privacy.

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

959959604233990145
:lmao

[Pavlov]

Excerpt from a good interview that TSA will pretend never happened:


To the point, it is silly to think that 'opposition' research is unusable simply because it is opposition research. What matters is its veracity, not where it came from.

If sourcing was paramount, we wouldn't be able to talk to criminals to solve crimes. We wouldn't be able to make deals with crooked politicians to ferret out corruption committed by other politicians. We wouldn't be able to talk to foreign intelligence officers to determine if Americans are betraying our country.

https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2018/02/1060804-fbi-special-agent-in-charge-who-has-testified-in-front-of-nunes-responds-to-biggest-claims-in-memo/

[TSA]

Excerpt from a good interview that TSA will pretend never happened:



https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2018/02/1060804-fbi-special-agent-in-charge-who-has-testified-in-front-of-nunes-responds-to-biggest-claims-in-memo/

:lol veracity
:lol Steele dossier

:rollin

[Pavlov]

:lol veracity
:lol Steele dossier

:rollin:lmao here's the part where TSA pretends the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application.

Are you saying the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

Excerpt from a good interview that TSA will pretend never happened:



https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2018/02/1060804-fbi-special-agent-in-charge-who-has-testified-in-front-of-nunes-responds-to-biggest-claims-in-memo/

Look at you getting all fancy with your quotes. This is serious business for you.

[Pavlov]

Look at you getting all fancy with your quotes. This is serious business for you.I always quote this way.

You never read them.

[TSA]

You think four Republican FISA judges couldn't figure out it was an entity opposed to Trump?

:rollin

Not everyone is as stupid as you, TSA.


Based on the Justice Department ommission of the fact that the Steele dossier was unsubstantiated dirt paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. They admit they could have never gotten the FISA warrant without it.

You abandoned this attempt rather quickly

[Spurtacular]

959521687690596352

Pretty sure BS outsourcing his meme tweets, tbh. This segment flies in the face of that tweet.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO5ZHPmh8LM

[TSA]

:lmao here's the part where TSA pretends the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application.

Are you saying the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application?

Yes or no.

You’ll have to ask McCabe :rollin

[Pavlov]

You abandoned this attempt rather quicklyNope. I addressed this directly.

[Pavlov]

You’ll have to ask McCabe :rollinDodge #1.

Are you saying the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application?

Yes or no.

[Spurminator]

:rollin


:lmao


:lol veracity
:lol Steele dossier

:rollin


You’ll have to ask McCabe :rollin

This is how someone posts when they are clearly winning an argument and should be taken seriously.

[Pavlov]

This is how someone posts when they are clearly winning an argument and should be taken seriously.Yeah, TSA hasn't been the same since he tried to pimp Cat Stevens mind control in his #pizzagate thread.

[TSA]

Nope. I addressed this directly.

CC said the FISC was never told who funded the dossier. You proceed to post an article supporting his claim.
:rollin

[Pavlov]

It's pretty much like trading posts with Nbadan over his 9/11 conspiracies.

TSAdan will forever be moving the goalposts and say WELLWHATABOUTTHIS? forgetting all the bullshit he believed before it fell apart.

[TSA]

Dodge #1.

Are you saying the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application?

Yes or no.

I haven’t read the application so I can’t answer. I do know how important McCabe said the dossier was in obtaining it.

[TSA]

This is how someone posts when they are clearly winning an argument and should be taken seriously.

There’s really nothing to argue I just do that for entertainment. You’ve all been taken like fools and continue to be regardless of the evidence presented. There’s no helping you useful idiots.

[Pavlov]

CC said the FISC was never told who funded the dossier. You proceed to post an article supporting his claim.
:rollinActually I posted this.

If anywhere in the application it is said that the source is anti-Trump, it's all good.

Trouble is, we'd need to see the application to make sure.

You're lying again, TSA.

Now we have three reports saying the source documents contain exactly that information.

Unless the WSJ is in on the conspiracy now.

[Pavlov]

I haven’t read the application so I can’t answerActually that means your answer is no.

You are not saying the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application.

[Pavlov]

There’s really nothing to argue I just do that for entertainment. You’ve all been taken like fools and continue to be regardless of the evidence presented. There’s no helping you useful idiots.Cat Stevens mind control, TSA. You presented as evidence a guy that believes in Cat Stevens mind control.

Cat

Stevens

mind

control

[TSA]

Actually I posted this.


You're lying again, TSA.

Now we have three reports saying the source documents contain exactly that information.

Unless the WSJ is in on the conspiracy now.

You have three reports that say during the application for the FISA the FISC was told that the DNC funded the Steele dossier?

Not sure how I missed a bombshell like that three times can you provide three links? Even one link will do just fine.

[TSA]

Cat Stevens mind control, TSA. You presented as evidence a guy that believes in Cat Stevens mind control.

Cat

Stevens

mind

control

This is how someone posts when they are clearly winning an argument and should be taken seriously

[Pavlov]

You have three reports that say during the application for the FISA the FISC was told that the DNC funded the Steele dossier?More lies from you.


Not sure how I missed a bombshell like that three times can you provide three links? Even one link will do just fine.I'm sure you are lying about what I posted at the time and just reposted minutes ago.

[Chris]

This is how someone posts when they are clearly winning an argument and should be taken seriously

*Risitas

[Pavlov]

This is how someone posts when they are clearly winning an argument and should be taken seriouslyActually it's how someone reminds a you that you used a guy who believes in Cat Stevens mind control to support your argument.

SPOILER ALERT: You did not win that argument.

[TSA]

More lies from you.

I'm sure you are lying about what I posted at the time and just reposted minutes ago.

Thanks for admitting you never addressed CC’s claim.

[Pavlov]

Thanks for admitting you never addressed CC’s claim.I did. Then and now. You just can't stand that you got caught in another lie.

It's what you do now.

[TSA]

*Risitas

:cry but but but remember that argument from last year :cry

Fkk9DI-8el4

[TSA]

I did. Then and now. You just can't stand that you got caught in another lie.

It's what you do now.

Can you link your quote where you address the FISC being told the opposition research being submitted for the FISA was funded by the DNC. K thx

[Pavlov]

Can you link your quote where you address the FISC being told the opposition research being submitted for the FISA was funded by the DNC. K thxI already explained then that it's a red herring since revealing the identities of sources is not usually done on FISA warrant applications. If they say it's oppo research, that's good enough for FISC.

I did not cite my source then since CC left, but the IJR interview I posted explains it fully.

Did you read that?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

I haven’t read the application so I can’t answer. I do know how important McCabe said the dossier was in obtaining it.


Actually that means your answer is no.

You are not saying the dossier was the only evidence used in the FISA application.

:lmao Chump unhinged / #StillWithHer

[Pavlov]

:lmao Chump unhinged / #StillWithHer
4) Butthurt grudge post.
I understand the conversation is too advanced for you and you feel frustrated.

[Reck]

I don't watch Fox news faggot, but I am able to read with an open mind.

Umm you said you read the memo but insist the inviestigation was triggered by the DNC and the dossier which the memo itself refutes. :lol

Go sit along side Koriwhat and Mikeariano.

[Reck]

Then your point was shit. FBM getting exposed.

Blake won this without having to do anything. :lol

There's a reason why your're ST's derp in chief.

[Spurtacular]

Blake won this without having to do anything. :lol

There's a reason why your're ST's derp in chief.

Tranny jumping in with blanket declarations. So desperate for W's. :lol

[Reck]

Tranny jumping in with blanket declarations. So desperate for W's. :lol

You quoted me, so no, I'm not jumping in, derptacular.

Is McCabe retiring/resigning/fired whatever you want to call it without full benefits?

Because according to you, if he was let go because of this memo, he wouldn't be enjoying the perks of retirement benefits. :lol

[Spurtacular]

You quoted me, so no, I'm not jumping in, derptacular.

Is McCabe retiring/resigning/fired whatever you want to call it without full benefits?

Because according to you, if he was let go because of this memo, he wouldn't be enjoying the perks of retirement benefits. :lol

He gone b/c the heat was on. And he retired b/c those benefits don't get revoked or lessened once they're instated.

:lol Today's tranny thinking he/she had something.
:lol Trying to hitch your trailer to a cuck.

[Reck]

He gone b/c the heat was on. And he retired b/c those benefits don't get revoked or lessened once they're instated.

:lol Today's tranny thinking he/she had something.
:lol Trying to hitch your trailer to a cuck.

What are you talking about, gimp?

He pulled a wool out from under Trump. What's worse is that Wray threatened to resigned if McCabe was pushed out.

He used his accumulated unclaimed leave time to reach the retirement with benefits threshold.

958039366009610241

:lol Talking out of his ass per par
:lol benefits dont get revoked or lessened
:lol instated
:lol resignation came as a surprise
:lol heads rolling
:lol muh memo

http://media.giphy.com/media/YsLkkSvGXheh2/giphy.gif

[Spurtacular]

What are you talking about, gimp?

He pulled a wool out from under Trump. What's worse is that Wray threatened to resigned if McCabe was pushed out.

He used his accumulated unclaimed leave time to reach the retirement with benefits threshold.

958039366009610241

:lol Talking out of his ass per par
:lol benefits dont get revoked or lessened
:lol instated
:lol resignation came as a surprise
:lol heads rolling
:lol muh memo

http://media.giphy.com/media/YsLkkSvGXheh2/giphy.gif

McCabe retired early to have his retirement benefit enacted. Your tweet only makes my point. Fuck you dumb, tranny.

[Reck]

Deputy FBI director for one.


The guy that was gonna retire from the fbi this year any way.

Trump pushing hard on McCabe could ultimately backfire in an obstruction case


McCabe retired early to have his retirement benefit enacted. Your tweet only makes my point. Fuck you dumb, tranny.

Do I even need to say more?

Heads be rolling.....oh wait...no no I meant he's just retiring with full benefits. :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

960133465441218562

[djohn2oo8]

960133465441218562

https://i.imgur.com/DwekylS.gif

Gowdy taking out Chris and TSA.

[Blake]

McCabe retired early to have his retirement benefit enacted. Your tweet only makes my point. Fuck you dumb, tranny.

You don't really understand how retirement works. Or personal leave.

[Blake]

Do I even need to say more?

Heads be rolling.....oh wait...no no I meant he's just retiring with full benefits. :lmao

Rolling his own head

[TSA]

REP. RATCLIFFE: POTENTIAL FISA ABUSES IN DECLASSIFIED MEMO ARE SUPPORTED BY SOURCE DOCUMENTS

WASHINGTON – Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) issued the following statement on the release and declassification of a memo prepared by the majority members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence regarding oversight of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). He is one of just a handful of members of Congress to have reviewed the underlying source documents for the potential FISA abuses outlined in the majority memo:

“As a former U.S. Attorney and federal terrorism prosecutor with considerable FISA experience, I am more than just troubled by the revelations outlined in this memo. Subsequent to my initial review of the memo, I also reviewed, in detail, the still-classified, underlying source documents upon which the initial warrant application and all subsequent warrant renewal applications to surveil an American citizen were made. I believe the memo unfortunately but accurately highlights questionable actions and departures from required legal standards and practices under FISA by a discrete number of senior agents and officials, who appear to have allowed politics to contaminate our apolitical justice system.

“It is my hope that the revelations of this memo will not be misconstrued as a condemnation of the tens of thousands of brave women and men who nobly serve the public with distinction and integrity in the DOJ and FBI. This memo can and should, however, be viewed as an appropriate expression of Congress’ oversight responsibilities of these vital institutions. Further oversight and accountability for the individuals in question is necessary to ensure that the American people can have confidence in these important institutions going forward.”

https://ratcliffe.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-ratcliffe-source-documents-confirm-potential-fisa-abused-highlighted

[boutons_deux]

Nothing was "outlined" in a Repug propagana hit peice :lol

Texas :lol

FUCKING shithole EAST TEXAS :lol

[TSA]

960133465441218562

Gowdy, who’s read the source documents; the disclosure that dossier was politically motivated was contained in a footnote in FISA application

[Pavlov]

REP. RATCLIFFE: POTENTIAL FISA ABUSES IN DECLASSIFIED MEMO ARE SUPPORTED BY SOURCE DOCUMENTS

WASHINGTON – Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) issued the following statement on the release and declassification of a memo prepared by the majority members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence regarding oversight of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). He is one of just a handful of members of Congress to have reviewed the underlying source documents for the potential FISA abuses outlined in the majority memo:

“As a former U.S. Attorney and federal terrorism prosecutor with considerable FISA experience, I am more than just troubled by the revelations outlined in this memo. Subsequent to my initial review of the memo, I also reviewed, in detail, the still-classified, underlying source documents upon which the initial warrant application and all subsequent warrant renewal applications to surveil an American citizen were made. I believe the memo unfortunately but accurately highlights questionable actions and departures from required legal standards and practices under FISA by a discrete number of senior agents and officials, who appear to have allowed politics to contaminate our apolitical justice system.

“It is my hope that the revelations of this memo will not be misconstrued as a condemnation of the tens of thousands of brave women and men who nobly serve the public with distinction and integrity in the DOJ and FBI. This memo can and should, however, be viewed as an appropriate expression of Congress’ oversight responsibilities of these vital institutions. Further oversight and accountability for the individuals in question is necessary to ensure that the American people can have confidence in these important institutions going forward.”

https://ratcliffe.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-ratcliffe-source-documents-confirm-potential-fisa-abused-highlightedIt's a good thing a guy with so much experience talked at length about the specific legal standards.

So convincing!

[Pavlov]

Gowdy, who’s read the source documents; the disclosure that dossier was politically motivated was contained in a footnote in FISA applicationSo now Republicans admit it was in the application.

OK.

This is going so well for you!

[hitmanyr2k]

960133465441218562

It's amusing when Republicans get honest when they're on the way out the door. Gowdy would have never said any of this shit if he were still a lapdog like Nunes.

[Reck]

So now Republicans admit it was in the application.

OK.

This is going so well for you!

This is precisely the problem with TSA. He has to win every silly point he makes regardless if its true or not.

Perpetually in child mode. Cant tell him he's wrong or like a kid, he will throw a tantrum and cry about how he's right and you're wrong.

[TSA]

So now Republicans admit it was in the application.

OK.

This is going so well for you!

It actually is going well for me and the fact that you race in here and try and refute every single thing I post shows me how poorly it’s going for you.

I said it from the start, the Nunes memo was nothing more than a primer for the public. Grassley/Graham memo is due out next, followed by the OIG investigation report. All three are tied together and focusing on the same abuses within the DOJ/FBI. You thought you were in the clear but the exposure of the corruption within the Obama administration is just getting started.

2018 will not be kind to your side.

[Reck]

It actually is going well for me and the fact that you race in here and try and refute every single thing I post shows me how poorly it’s going for you.

I said it from the start, the Nunes memo was nothing more than a primer for the public. Grassley/Graham memo is due out next, followed by the OIG investigation report. All three are tied together and focusing on the same abuses within the DOJ/FBI. You thought you were in the clear but the exposure of the corruption within the Obama administration is just getting started.

2018 will not be kind to your side.


This is precisely the problem with TSA. He has to win every silly point he makes regardless if its true or not.

Perpetually in child mode. Cant tell him he's wrong or like a kid, he will throw a tantrum and cry about how he's right and you're wrong.

:lmao Not one minute after posting he goes and proves me right. :lol

[Reck]

It actually is going well for me and the fact that you race in here and try and refute every single thing I post shows me how poorly it’s going for you.

I said it from the start, the Nunes memo was nothing more than a primer for the public. Grassley/Graham memo is due out next, followed by the OIG investigation report. All three are tied together and focusing on the same abuses within the DOJ/FBI. You thought you were in the clear but the exposure of the corruption within the Obama administration is just getting started.

2018 will not be kind to your side.

It's sad though how you jump from conspiracy to conspiracy and let down to let down.

Now you're pinning your hopes and dreams on a Grassley and Graham memo. Man...

[Pavlov]

It actually is going well for me and the fact that you race in here and try and refute every single thing I post shows me how poorly it’s going for you.You just supported what I have been posting the last two days.

:lmao

This is going so well for you!

[Pavlov]

959982534414209026:lol a paraody site lays it out.

TSA is going all out to defend this idiot.

[Pavlov]

It's sad though how you jump from conspiracy to conspiracy and let down to let down.

Now you're pinning your hopes and dreams on a Grassley and Graham memo. Man...TSAdan runs around between conservativetreehouse.com and ST like Nunes between the White House and the press.

Tell me, TSA -- who hired Carter Page?

[DarrinS]

TSAdan runs around between conservativetreehouse.com and ST like Nunes between the White House and the press.

Tell me, TSA -- who hired Carter Page?


Who hired him?

[Pavlov]

Who hired him?Good question.

That's why I asked it.

[DarrinS]

Good question.

That's why I asked it.

Now, I’m asking you. Who hired him?

[Pavlov]

Now, I’m asking you. Who hired him?I asked the question because I don't know who hired Carter Page, Darrin.

Do you know who hired Carter Page, Darrin?

[Blake]

Now, I’m asking you. Who hired him?

Don't ruin it. I want to see tsa's face when he discovers the truth

[Reck]

I asked the question because I don't know who hired Carter Page, Darrin.

Do you know who hired Carter Page, Darrin?

We can at least say we know what Carter Page has in common with Trump though.

[djohn2oo8]

Now, I’m asking you. Who hired him?
Better question. Who vetted him?

[djohn2oo8]

960218903577231360
Lordy!

[Pavlov]

960218903577231360
Lordy!:lol

Why can't Nunes do anything by the book, TSAdan?

[boutons_deux]

Anyway, FBI gets leads from everywhere, why not from GPS F / Steele?

[spurraider21]

Gowdy, who’s read the source documents; the disclosure that dossier was politically motivated was contained in a footnote in FISA application
if you're under the impression that a footnote in a legal briefing is in any way comparable to fine print in that they are insignificant, often glossed over, or meant to be hidden in any way, then you're just misinformed. footnoes in legal briefings are incredibly common practice. we use them all the time

i mean, just read the intro paragraph to this entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co.)... we spent a hell of a lot of time in Constituional Law just learning about "footnote four"


It actually is going well for me and the fact that you race in here and try and refute every single thing I post shows me how poorly it’s going for you.
if every single thing you post here can be so easily refuted then it's probably not going well for you

[boutons_deux]

:lol

Why can't Nunes do anything by the book, TSAdan?

Patel typifies Nunes', Repug malicious, willful incompetence

[Pavlov]

TSAdan and the others keep going on about the Steele dossier's being totes unverified. The truth is Steele nailed details about the privatization of a Russian oil company months before its board even knew them. That privatization scheme is the basis of a alleged bribe offered to Page. The fact that the dossier was so accurate in that respect probably helped get Page's FISA warrant renewed by another Republican judge.

[djohn2oo8]

TSAdan and the others keep going on about the Steele dossier's being totes unverified. The truth is Steele nailed details about the privatization of a Russian oil company months before its board even knew them. That privatization scheme is the basis of a alleged bribe offered to Page. The fact that the dossier was so accurate in that respect probably helped get Page's FISA warrant renewed by another Republican judge.

He doesn't even want to google the process of obtaining a FISA Warrant

[djohn2oo8]

959651802235920385

[djohn2oo8]

Given that story line, one can only conclude that the Nunes memo fails to make its case—and fails quite badly at that.

Consider, first, the obvious timing problem. The Nunes memo begins with a FISA application dated October 21, 2016. That date is significant for a number of reasons. As an initial matter, coming less than 20 days before the election, it seems a particularly poor way of trying to influence the outcome of the election. A FISA application just a few days before November 9 would not actually have produced any evidence until well*after*the election—making Nunes' implicit charge of a corrupted investigation chronologically implausible. In addition, the focus on this date has to deal with the uncomfortable fact that the surveillance of Page it authorized started roughly a month*after*Page officially left the Trump campaign—so, again, it is a poor way of effectuating a bias against Trump to collect evidence relating to the actions of a former campaign volunteer

https://www.politico.com/magazine/amp/story/2018/02/02/the-nunes-memo-makes-no-sense-216928?__twitter_impression=true

[Chris]

I asked the question because I don't know who hired Carter Page, Darrin.

Do you know who hired Carter Page, Darrin?

Why can't you answer a simple question? Darrin was asking you.

[Pavlov]

Why can't you answer a simple question? Darrin was asking you.Chris, I asked the question.

[Blake]

Chris, I asked the question.

Lol for fuck sakes Chris.

[TSA]

if you're under the impression that a footnote in a legal briefing is in any way comparable to fine print in that they are insignificant, often glossed over, or meant to be hidden in any way, then you're just misinformed. footnoes in legal briefings are incredibly common practice. we use them all the time

i mean, just read the intro paragraph to this entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co.)... we spent a hell of a lot of time in Constituional Law just learning about "footnote four"


if every single thing you post here can be so easily refuted then it's probably not going well for you

“try” to refute

[TSA]

Given that story line, one can only conclude that the Nunes memo fails to make its case—and fails quite badly at that.

Consider, first, the obvious timing problem. The Nunes memo begins with a FISA application dated October 21, 2016. That date is significant for a number of reasons. As an initial matter, coming less than 20 days before the election, it seems a particularly poor way of trying to influence the outcome of the election. A FISA application just a few days before November 9 would not actually have produced any evidence until well*after*the election—making Nunes' implicit charge of a corrupted investigation chronologically implausible. In addition, the focus on this date has to deal with the uncomfortable fact that the surveillance of Page it authorized started roughly a month*after*Page officially left the Trump campaign—so, again, it is a poor way of effectuating a bias against Trump to collect evidence relating to the actions of a former campaign volunteer

https://www.politico.com/magazine/amp/story/2018/02/02/the-nunes-memo-makes-no-sense-216928?__twitter_impression=true

The FISA warrant on Page was to cover for all the previous 702 about queries that were run as it’s retroactive. Adm. Mike Rogers shut down the about queries so the DOJ/FBI needed Page to keep surveillance going. The FISA warrant sought for Page was also title I not title VII so any of Page’s contacts could also be put under surveillance.

Do you understand the difference between title I and title VII and why they sought it?

[Pavlov]

The FISA warrant on Page was to cover for all the previous 702 about queries that were run as it’s retroactive. Adm. Mike Rogers shut down the about queries so the DOJ/FBI needed Page to keep surveillance going. The FISA warrant sought for Page was also title I not title VII so any of Page’s contacts could also be put under surveillance.

Do you understand the difference between title I and title VII and why they sought it?:lmao the conspiracy widens.

Let me guess -- sundance?

[djohn2oo8]

960511020400771072

[djohn2oo8]

960511020400771072

960529915287392256
:lmao busted

[Blake]

Lol

[djohn2oo8]

960533533826732038
:lol

[dabom]

:lol

Ya trumpfags getting owned every single fucking minute. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

960513046438449152
lol

[Splits]

960529915287392256
:lmao busted

lol what a fool. Congress has their own Trump

[djohn2oo8]

960541041320517632

[dabom]

960541041320517632

Very powerful. I don't say that lightly.

[djohn2oo8]

960719719027433472
:lmao :lmao :lmao

[Chris]

960719719027433472
:lmao :lmao :lmao

I hope Trump rejects it just to bust some balls. :lol it would be WW3 for the Left :lmao

[boutons_deux]

https://images.dailykos.com/images/504334/story_image/and0206web.jpg?1517861989

[djohn2oo8]

960855641513496576
lol who keeps letting this dunce in tv

[Reck]

960855641513496576
lol who keeps letting this dunce in tv

I knew he would fuck up. :lmao

[boutons_deux]

960855641513496576
lol who keeps letting this dunce in tv

One of the articles I posted said Pootin's groomers gave up on Page because he was too stupid.

[djohn2oo8]

I knew he would fuck up. :lmao
and Trump tards don't think that dumbass made himself an easy target.

[djohn2oo8]

960852928616718338

[djohn2oo8]

960852928616718338

960622873542037507
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

960740286849675264

[djohn2oo8]

960740286849675264

Another TSA theory down

https://media.giphy.com/media/134UEF4C8g3I7S/giphy.gif

[TSA]

960740286849675264

The Nunes memo said the FISC was never told the Steele dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign and it wasn't. There was no lie in the memo.

[TSA]

Another TSA theory down

https://media.giphy.com/media/134UEF4C8g3I7S/giphy.gif

The Nunes memo revealed a damning omission

Having reviewed hundreds and hundreds of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant applications as the final stop between the FBI and the desks of Attorneys General William French Smith and Edwin Meese III, I read the Nunes memo as revealing one major fact that stands out above all other revelations: The FISA warrant for surveillance on Carter Page (and the three subsequent renewals of the warrant) omitted a material fact. While the FBI admitted that the information came from a politically motivated source, the bureau did not disclose that the source had been financed by Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. That is a damning omission.

My job reviewing those warrants existed because prior to the establishment of a National Security Division at the Justice Department, a special assistant to the attorney general with the appropriate clearances had the job of making sure the attorney general did not sign off on a warrant application that got bounced back from the FISA court. Such a rejection had never happened before I got there, didn’t happen while it was my job and has happened only a handful of times since. That record is in large part because of trust developed between the FISA courts and the FBI and Justice Department over decades, especially the respect accorded the counterintelligence professionals at the bureau. That trust has now been injured.

Upon publication of the Nunes memo, a retired federal judge emailed me: “There is not an officer of the court in the land who in the context of this particular application to the FISA court should not have identified the source of the information as having been the [Democratic National Committee] and the Clinton Campaign. If I had granted the application and then subsequently learned that the information was sourced to the DNC and the Campaign, I would have rescinded the authorization and issued a show-cause order to the Government to explain who and why this sourcing was not made known to the court. The fact (if it be that) that the Government told the court that it was a political source, but did not identify who, in this particular instance, is highly probative that the Government purposely misled the court.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-nunes-memo-revealed-a-damning-omission/2018/02/05/189f05e0-0a91-11e8-8b0d-891602206fb7_story.html?utm_term=.ae4cbc7a18cf

[djohn2oo8]

The Nunes memo said the FISC was never told the Steele dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign and it wasn't. There was no lie in the memo.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/hotair.com/archives/2018/02/05/nunes-well-technically-maybe-doj-disclose-dossiers-political-bias-fisa-court/amp/

He did not deny the footnote was there
:lmao :lmao :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

960643116192722944
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

But in an appearance on "Fox & Friends," Nunes was asked about reports over the weekend that the FBI application did refer to a political entity connected to the dossier. It is unclear precisely what language the application might have used.

Nunes conceded that a "footnote" to that effect was included in the application, while faulting the bureau for failing to provide more specifics.

Bam. Boom Disclosed. You lost again PeeSA. :lmao

[boutons_deux]

Holy shit, rightwingnutjob assholes are pathetic and hilarious

[djohn2oo8]

Gowdy read the footnote. Lordy!

[TSA]

But in an appearance on "Fox & Friends," Nunes was asked about reports over the weekend that the FBI application did refer to a political entity connected to the dossier. It is unclear precisely what language the application might have used.

Nunes conceded that a "footnote" to that effect was included in the application, while faulting the bureau for failing to provide more specifics.

Bam. Boom Disclosed. You lost again PeeSA. :lmao

The Nunes memo said the FISC was never told the Steele dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign and it wasn't. The footnote did not disclose who funded the dossier either.


“There is not an officer of the court in the land who in the context of this particular application to the FISA court should not have identified the source of the information as having been the [Democratic National Committee] and the Clinton Campaign. If I had granted the application and then subsequently learned that the information was sourced to the DNC and the Campaign, I would have rescinded the authorization and issued a show-cause order to the Government to explain who and why this sourcing was not made known to the court. The fact (if it be that) that the Government told the court that it was a political source, but did not identify who, in this particular instance, is highly probative that the Government purposely misled the court.”

[Blake]

Tsa not giving up, digging in

[djohn2oo8]

The Nunes memo said the FISC was never told the Steele dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign and it wasn't. The footnote did not disclose who funded the dossier either.


“There is not an officer of the court in the land who in the context of this particular application to the FISA court should not have identified the source of the information as having been the [Democratic National Committee] and the Clinton Campaign. If I had granted the application and then subsequently learned that the information was sourced to the DNC and the Campaign, I would have rescinded the authorization and issued a show-cause order to the Government to explain who and why this sourcing was not made known to the court. The fact (if it be that) that the Government told the court that it was a political source, but did not identify who, in this particular instance, is highly probative that the Government purposely misled the court.”

Sorry TSA. The court was notified the dossier had a political backing. And was STILL approved. You lose.

[TSA]

Tsa not giving up, digging in

There's nothing to give up on, Clinton/DNC/FBI/DOJ are all fucked. It's amusing watching the left claim victory after a 4 page memo was released while forgetting that the OIG investigation has been going on for over a year and Horowitz has been working directly with Grassley and Nunes. Where do you think the source documents Nunes used came from? Where did the Strzok/Page texts come from? Who recovered the Strzok/Page texts the FBI said were missing?

[djohn2oo8]

Pisser is triggered.

[Blake]

There's nothing to give up on, Clinton/DNC/FBI/DOJ are all fucked.

Yeah I haven't really kept up much but I'm thinking lol no.

[djohn2oo8]

Yeah I haven't really kept up much but I'm thinking lol no.

Trump's own appointees at the DOJ who approved the applications are all fucked.

[Blake]

Well, I'm really waiting the Horowitz report due out sometime this Spring.

Should be good.

[djohn2oo8]

McCabe - Republican
Comey - Republican
Rosenstein - Republican
Wray - Republican
FISA judges selected by John Roberts, another republican.

Somehow all a Hillary conspiracy :lol

[Pavlov]

The Nunes memo said the FISC was never told the Steele dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign and it wasn't. There was no lie in the memo.Is it a FISA requirement that the funding source must be completely disclosed?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

The Nunes memo said the FISC was never told the Steele dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign and it wasn't. The footnote did not disclose who funded the dossier either.


“There is not an officer of the court in the land who in the context of this particular application to the FISA court should not have identified the source of the information as having been the [Democratic National Committee] and the Clinton Campaign. If I had granted the application and then subsequently learned that the information was sourced to the DNC and the Campaign, I would have rescinded the authorization and issued a show-cause order to the Government to explain who and why this sourcing was not made known to the court. The fact (if it be that) that the Government told the court that it was a political source, but did not identify who, in this particular instance, is highly probative that the Government purposely misled the court.”:lol unnamed former federal judge

Four Republican appointed federal judges did know it was oppo research.

It was good enough for them.

And this is Carter Page we're talking about.

[djohn2oo8]

Schiff disputed the GOP memo's assertion as "not accurate," saying the court was aware that there was a "likely political motivation" behind the Steele dossier. The California Democrat also said it is normal in FISA applications not to name individuals who may be sources of information.

The Washington Post, New York Times and Wall Street Journal reported after the memo's release that the FISA court was aware of political motivations behind the dossier.

According to an official cited in the Post on Friday, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity, the Justice Department presented "ample disclosure of relevant, material facts," to the FISA court, including that "the research was being paid for by a political entity."

[Pavlov]

There's nothing to give up on, Clinton/DNC/FBI/DOJ are all fucked. It's amusing watching the left claim victory after a 4 page memo was released while forgetting that the OIG investigation has been going on for over a year and Horowitz has been working directly with Grassley and Nunes. Where do you think the source documents Nunes used came from? Where did the Strzok/Page texts come from? Who recovered the Strzok/Page texts the FBI said were missing?Why didn't Nunes read the source documents, TSA?

[djohn2oo8]

Why didn't Nunes read the source documents, TSA?

I'll answer. His TSCI was stripped months ago.

[Pavlov]

Those four Republican FISA judges are fucked!

Yeah!

[TSA]

Sorry TSA. The court was notified the dossier had a political backing. And was STILL approved. You lose.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

[TSA]

I'll answer. His TSCI was stripped months ago.

Wrong, just like your claim Nunes was recused.

[Pavlov]

Wrong, just like your claim Nunes was recused.So why didn't he even look at the source documents?

[djohn2oo8]

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

Did the court require that information? Yes or No?

[djohn2oo8]

Wrong, just like your claim Nunes was recused.

Nope. Why wouldn't Nunes look at relevant documents? Unless he has no access to it. Which he does not have access to classified intelligence anymore.

[Pavlov]

BAIER: Did you read the actual FISA applications?

NUNES: No, I didn’t. This has been one of the bogus news stories that had been put out. So, the agreement we made with the Department of Justice was to create a reading room and allow one member and two investigators to go over and review the documents. I thought the best person on our committee will be the chairman of the Oversight Committee, Trey Gowdy, who has a long career as a federal prosecutor, to go and do this.

GOWDY: This is the right time, for me, to leave politics

lol

[Spurminator]

So if I'm scanning this correctly, the position of the Posobiec/Cernovich/4chan wing hinges on the assumptions that:

- Intelligence sources cannot be impartial if they are funded by partisan groups
- FBI employees cannot have opinions about political candidates and contribute impartially to investiagations

Does that about cover it? These are certainly brand new standards regardless of how you feel about their validity.

[Pavlov]

So if I'm scanning this correctly, the position of the Posobiec/Cernovich/4chan wing hinges on the assumptions that:

- Intelligence sources cannot be impartial if they are funded by partisan groups
- FBI employees cannot have opinions about political candidates and contribute impartially to investiagations

Does that about cover it? These are certainly brand new standards regardless of how you feel about their validity.Yeah and Great Satan du jour Bruce Ohr covered up Steele's desperation to prevent a Trump presidency by officially documenting an interview saying Steele was desperate to prevent a Trump presidency.

Diabolical!

[Mark Celibate]

Guy never takes a day off, cuckposting and atheistposting 24/7 365

[spurraider21]

I mean, Gowdy, the one guy who actually read the application, is the same guy that's saying Mueller's investigation is in no way discredited or compromised, and voiced legitimate concerns. And this is a guy who typically isn't afraid to take partisan stances on investigations (made his congressional career on benghazi)

[spurraider21]

Guy never takes a day off, cuckposting and atheistposting 24/7 365
that loses its effect when you essentially use that to describe anything you don't agree with

[Mark Celibate]

Yeah yeah we get it, it triggers you you’ve told me before

[Brazil]

Yeah yeah we get it, it triggers you you’ve told me before

still virgin bro ?

[Mark Celibate]

Still 2nd grade brah? Grow up and get better insults tbh. At least be funny

[spurraider21]

Yeah. start using cuck more. GOAT insult

[Mark Celibate]

Tings must be slow today in the caliphate of frankistan tbh

[TSA]

Did the court require that information? Yes or No?

You dodged a very simple yes or no question. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

[Mark Celibate]

You dodged a very simple yes or no question. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

Yes

[TSA]

Nope. Why wouldn't Nunes look at relevant documents? Unless he has no access to it. Which he does not have access to classified intelligence anymore.

DOJ only allowed one member of congress to review and Nunes chose Gowdy as he would be the most qualified to review them. You keep saying Nunes doesn't have access to classified intelligence anymore and that is a lie just like when you said Nunes recused himself from the investigation.

[boutons_deux]

Nunes: Fine, the FBI Didn’t Lie, But Its Font Was Too Small

Nunes was asked (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHkTXAP7UbU) about this on Fox & Friends.

He did not deny the point.

Instead he insisted that it wasn’t good enough because the disclosure was merely a footnote.

“A footnote saying something may be political

is a far cry from letting the American people know that

the Democrats and the Hillary campaign paid for dirt that

the FBI then used to get a warrant on an American citizen to spy on another campaign,”

the distinguished Republican :lol explained.

Notice how “The FBI LIED about the Steele dossier” has been scaled back to,

“The FBI did not highlight the truth about the Steele Dossier in the part of the application we bothered to read.”

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/02/nunes-fine-the-fbi-didnt-lie-but-its-font-was-too-small.html (http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/02/nunes-fine-the-fbi-didnt-lie-but-its-font-was-too-small.html)

Like TSA, Nunes is just so FULL OF SHIT

[Chris]

:lol dijon

[boutons_deux]

DOJ only allowed one member of congress to review and Nunes chose Gowdy

Why did non-recused Nunes choose himself instead of Gowdy?

Nunes was admitting he's an self-indicting unqualified dumbshit? :lol

But farmer Nunes thinks he knows enough Federal law to bring down Mueller? :lol

[boutons_deux]

...

[djohn2oo8]

You dodged a very simple yes or no question. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

Does the court require that? If they do not, then no issue.

[TSA]

Why did non-recused Nunes choose himself instead of Gowdy?

Nunes was admitting he's an self-indicting unqualified dumbshit? :lol

But farmer Nunes thinks he knows enough Federal law to bring down Mueller? :lol



Who would understand the source documents better Nunes or a former Federal prosecutor?