PDA

View Full Version : Oh, so this is what a nothingburger looks like!



Pages : 1 2 [3]

TSA
02-06-2018, 03:23 PM
Does the court require that? If they do not, then no issue.

You've dodged a very simple yes or no question twice now. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

Isitjustme?
02-06-2018, 03:23 PM
that loses its effect when you essentially use that to describe anything you don't agree with

Onlu cucks dont like getting called cucks, you cuck

Chris
02-06-2018, 03:24 PM
You've dodged a very simple yes or no question twice now. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

dodgerjohn2oo8 :lol

Blake
02-06-2018, 03:25 PM
Onlu cucks dont like getting called cucks, you cuck

So only non-cucks like being called cucks?

Blake
02-06-2018, 03:27 PM
You've dodged a very simple yes or no question twice now. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

Again, I haven't kept up, but I'm betting it's a false question per the ol' tsa par

spurraider21
02-06-2018, 03:27 PM
You've dodged a very simple yes or no question twice now. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?
from what we've seen, no.

there's your answer.

all we know according to muh memo is that the fbi and doj were aware of the political origins of the dossier, and now we've learned from gowdy, who read the application, that the FISA court was also made aware of the political origins of the dossier.

i mean, if i disclose that it is political opposition research, why is it so important to you that the exact named source (which apparently it is custom practice not to name exact sources) was revealed? explain why being made aware that the political origins/opposition research is not enough for the FISA court to take that into consideration before approving a warrant?

djohn2oo8
02-06-2018, 03:28 PM
You've dodged a very simple yes or no question twice now. Try again.

Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?

You can't provide that the court needed that information. Therefore, no you have no argument.

Isitjustme?
02-06-2018, 03:29 PM
So only non-cucks like being called cucks?
Captain Cuck chiming in

Spurminator
02-06-2018, 03:29 PM
Repetition of Red Herring questions was obviously a key chapter in The Gorilla Mindset.

Isitjustme?
02-06-2018, 03:31 PM
Cucks to the left of me cucks to the right...here i am cucked in the middle with you

Chris
02-06-2018, 03:32 PM
Cucks to the left of me cucks to the right...here i am cucked in the middle with you

http://mygeekblasphemy.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/1-2.jpg

boutons_deux
02-06-2018, 03:33 PM
Who would understand the source documents better Nunes or a former Federal prosecutor?

Nunes was responsible for the so-called "memo", so he should have read the documents, and asked for help from Gowdy if Nunes can't read

and why is a NON-lawyer with an agriculture education heading an Congressional intelligence committee? that's typical Repug kakistocracy.

boutons_deux
02-06-2018, 03:40 PM
Here's another Repug motherfucker who won't / can't read, but who has The Best Brain

John Kelly says Trump likely won’t read ‘quite lengthy’ 10-page Democratic memo on FBI

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/trump-afp-1.jpg

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/john-kelly-says-trump-likely-wont-read-quite-lengthy-10-page-democratic-memo-fbi/

Brazil
02-06-2018, 03:42 PM
Still 2nd grade brah? Grow up and get better insults tbh. At least be funny

:lol wtf bro... it was a serious question, you were not on the celibacy for life business being virgin and poetry and stuff ?

Mark Celibate
02-06-2018, 03:47 PM
:lol wtf bro... it was a serious question, you were not on the celibacy for life business being virgin and poetry and stuff ?
:lmao didn’t realize one of the many people operating this account used that shtick. Nah this isnt rogue.

Brazil
02-06-2018, 03:50 PM
:lmao didn’t realize one of the many people operating this account used that shtick. Nah this isnt rogue.

:lmao sorry brah tbh... I used to remember this account was about dat blond actress with big boobs (can't remember he name), poems, disappointing love story, virginity....

Chris
02-06-2018, 03:51 PM
The Goddess :lol

DisAsTerBot
02-06-2018, 03:54 PM
:lmao sorry brah tbh... I used to remember this account was about dat blond actress with big boobs (can't remember he name), poems, disappointing love story, virginity....

Nah this is the one that wants his foreskin back lmao

Blake
02-06-2018, 03:57 PM
Captain Cuck chiming in

Someone here said cuck and you chimed in quick.

You're pretty obsessed with it, tbhimo

Isitjustme?
02-06-2018, 04:04 PM
Someone here said cuck and you chimed in quick.

You're pretty obsessed with it, tbhimo

Tbh at least you had a woman to get cucked by so that puts you up on most of spurstalk

Blake
02-06-2018, 04:10 PM
Tbh at least you had a woman to get cucked by so that puts you up on most of spurstalk

Oh look you're still going on about it. No way!

TSA
02-06-2018, 05:24 PM
You can't provide that the court needed that information. Therefore, no you have no argument.

A simple yes or no question put dodgerjohn in the fetal position.

Spurminator
02-06-2018, 06:21 PM
A simple yes or no question put dodgerjohn in the fetal position.

Meanwhile, you've avoided spurraider21's direct answer to your question for two hours, which is why no one tries to engage with you in a real discussion anymore.

djohn's counter-question to your red herring is a sufficient response. You won't answer it.

TSA
02-06-2018, 09:02 PM
Meanwhile, you've avoided spurraider21's direct answer to your question for two hours, which is why no one tries to engage with you in a real discussion anymore.

djohn's counter-question to your red herring is a sufficient response. You won't answer it.

spurm shield activated

Brazil
02-07-2018, 06:20 AM
The Goddess :lol


Nah this is the one that wants his foreskin back lmao

classic

:lmao

Splits
02-07-2018, 09:01 AM
961203377618157568

Spurminator
02-07-2018, 09:51 AM
spurm shield activated

Nothing to shield. You're shooting blanks that make fart noises.

djohn2oo8
02-10-2018, 12:58 PM
962383170640412674
lol

monosylab1k
02-10-2018, 01:02 PM
962383170640412674
lol

:lmao

nunesmullet.jpg

boutons_deux
02-10-2018, 01:28 PM
What in steele dossier has been verified or disproven?

djohn2oo8
11-27-2019, 05:09 PM
a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials.

b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. Law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of -- and paid by -- the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.


Hiding these facts from the FISC is hardly a nothingburger. Will be interesting to see how the FBI and DOJ try and spin these facts.
Horowitz beating your bitch ass down :lmao

djohn2oo8
11-27-2019, 05:10 PM
You are really trying to push this line. FISA warrants are retroactive. The Page warrant was used to cover for the 702 about queries they were abusing prior to being shut down by Adm. Mike Rogers.

Why would the FBI hide who funded the Steele dossier when they presented it to the FISC? Why would the FBI be seeking a FISA warrant for Page in the first place?
Christ almighty :lmao

TSA
11-27-2019, 05:10 PM
:lmao nervous laughter
:lmao nervous bumping

djohn2oo8
11-27-2019, 05:10 PM
Because it just revealed that the FBI hid the fact it was using a DNC funded dossier to obtain a FISA warrant. This is just the tip of the iceberg. The OIG investigation will build upon this and reveal far more damaging information.
Bwhahahahahahhaha

djohn2oo8
11-27-2019, 05:11 PM
Did you even read the article? None of the below is minor.



The key finding of the Nunes Memo is that the Steele dossier “formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application,” without informing the FISA court that it originated from a partisan source, and that the “corroboration” for the Steele dossier was a Michael Isikoff article that was itself sourced from the dossier. As law professor Orin Kerr explains, that’s not necessarily a legal defect in the application. Nor, obviously, does it show that Carter Page should not have been a legitimate target for FISA surveillance. But it does suggest that the process of launching the Page investigation by the Obama DOJ and FBI got warped by presidential politics in the heat of campaign season and wasn’t adequately disclosed to the courts, two things that should not happen.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/456057/nunes-memo-here-what-does-it-mean

It focuses on then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, who documented Steele’s statement in September 2016 to the effect that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president,” and highlights that ever-present feature of incestuous DC operations: while Ohr was holding down a nominally nonpartisan job, his “wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump,” another fact not told to the FISA court.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/456057/nunes-memo-here-what-does-it-mean


"In other words, the Nunes Memo appears to reflect the FBI’s own view that the Steele dossier was in fact essential to the obtaining of the original FISA warrant."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/456057/nunes-memo-here-what-does-it-mean




"On the other hand, within those narrow confines, it does make a persuasive case – pending any detailed rebuttal by its partisan Democratic critics – that flimsily-corroborated Democratic Party campaign opposition research succeeded in influencing law enforcement to spy on a U.S. citizen involved in the political process at the height of a presidential campaign. That may not be an enormous scandal in size, but it is, if true, a scandal."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/456057/nunes-memo-here-what-does-it-mean
Horowitz says the dossier was in fact NOT a key part :lol

TSA
11-27-2019, 05:13 PM
:lmao keep melting down

djohn2oo8
11-27-2019, 05:24 PM
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/62/36/61/13233240/4/920x920.jpg

Spurtacular
11-27-2019, 05:46 PM
Oh yeah government spying on a presidential candidate due to a fake pee tape story funded by Clinton is a nothing burger :lmao

:lmao shithole country :lmao

:lmao Nuked the OP for your entrance
:lmao Slob / Chumpettes