The Official Tulsi Gabbard 2020 Bandwagon Thread

[AaronY]

holy shit :lol
Boutons would have given the Taliban financial support after 9/11 lol. after all they took out the U.S. his number 1 enemy in life. Also sure he considers Kuwait the aggressor in the Gulf War lol.

After all every local failure worldwide is America's fault. Hell South and Cemtral America would be a futuristic metropolises with flying cars and shit if the U.S. hadn't intervened so much there

[hater]

Boutons would have given the Taliban financial support after 9/11 lol. after all they took out the U.S. his number 1 enemy in life. Also sure he considers Kuwait the aggressor in the Gulf War lol.

After all every local failure worldwide is America's fault. Hell South and Cemtral America would be a futuristic metropolises with flying cars and shit if the U.S. hadn't intervened so much there

The Talibán did not attack us sherlock. The Talibán were just allowing Al Qaeda to operate from Afghanistan mainly because Al Qeda (which was created by US) helped them fight the Soviets.

What you forget is Saudi Arabia is the country that helped Al Qaeda the most to perform the 911 attacks. We allowed Saudi Arabia to pull their operatives immediately after the attack and never even mentioned or even sanction Saudi Arabia for this attack on US soil. Noone in Saudi Arabia was ever charged with this attack.

Regarding South America I would advise you to read up on Operation Condor. You willee that exactly, US is culpable for much of the problems in Central and South America.

[Quadzilla99]

Boutons would have given the Taliban financial support after 9/11 lol. after all they took out the U.S. his number 1 enemy in life. Also sure he considers Kuwait the aggressor in the Gulf War lol.

After all every local failure worldwide is America's fault. Hell South and Cemtral America would be a futuristic metropolises with flying cars and shit if the U.S. hadn't intervened so much there

US should have surrendered to Taliban and Al Qaeda after 9/11 tbh. Retaliating was stupid etc.

[hater]

US should have surrendered to Taliban and Al Qaeda after 9/11 tbh. Retaliating was stupid etc.

See my post above.

US actually surrendered to Saudi Arabia as they were the biggest sponsors of 911

[AaronY]

Everyone knows it was Al Qaeda but the Taliban was shielding them in Afghanistan. Goes without saying. Much like the fact that a guy who predicts WW3 being imminent 2x a week for 3+ years in a row has zero credibility on foreign politics and war

[hater]

Everyone knows it was Al Qaeda but the Taliban was shielding them in Afghanistan. Goes without saying. Much like the fact that a guy who predicts WW3 being imminent 2x a week for 3+ years in a row has zero credibility on foreign politics and war

Why did we not punish Saudi Arabia?

[hater]

Also al qaeda and Bin Laden were defeated years ago. Why are we still there?

[TheGreatYacht]

Boutons would have given the Taliban financial support after 9/11 lol. after all they took out the U.S. his number 1 enemy in life. Also sure he considers Kuwait the aggressor in the Gulf War lol.

After all every local failure worldwide is America's fault. Hell South and Cemtral America would be a futuristic metropolises with flying cars and shit if the U.S. hadn't intervened so much there

No but right-wingers would not be crying like little bitches wondering why we have illegal aliens trying to cross the border. You can mock all you want and deflect US war crimes but that won't change history. Remember facts don't care about your blind patriotism.

[TheGreatYacht]

Everyone knows it was Al Qaeda but the Taliban was shielding them in Afghanistan. Goes without saying. Much like the fact that a guy who predicts WW3 being imminent 2x a week for 3+ years in a row has zero credibility on foreign politics and war


https://youtu.be/O6LV93jKkXs

This a tough pill to swallow for your side but it's the plain truth.

[hater]

Why did we not punish Saudi Arabia?

Anyone?

[hater]

Also al qaeda and Bin Laden were defeated years ago. Why are we still there?

Anyone?

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi Comes Out For 'Medicare Choice'

https://youtu.be/7NmZYKF1MZA

[TheGreatYacht]

Ro Khanna Debunks Tulsi/Modi Controversy

https://youtu.be/VxURnHD4xdg

[Isitjustme?]

Boutons would have given the Taliban financial support after 9/11 lol. after all they took out the U.S. his number 1 enemy in life.
Pretty sure boo is a 9/11 truther so he for sure thinks 9/11 was the US's fault

[hater]

Pretty sure boo is a 9/11 truther so he for sure thinks 9/11 was the US's fault

We did create al qaeda to fight tbe soviets and we did host bin laden here at the Cia and armed him and trained him tbqh

[hater]

https://www.islamicity.org/global/images/photo/USA/Tim_Osama_FOIA__482x674.GIF

[pgardn]

The Talibán did not attack us sherlock. The Talibán were just allowing Al Qaeda to operate from Afghanistan mainly because Al Qeda (which was created by US) helped them fight the Soviets.

What you forget is Saudi Arabia is the country that helped Al Qaeda the most to perform the 911 attacks. We allowed Saudi Arabia to pull their operatives immediately after the attack and never even mentioned or even sanction Saudi Arabia for this attack on US soil. Noone in Saudi Arabia was ever charged with this attack.

Regarding South America I would advise you to read up on Operation Condor. You willee that exactly, US is culpable for much of the problems in Central and South America.

The above is such a distorted pile of crap its not worth commenting on except on our role and the general randomness of these ordeals.

We definitely did supply money, mostly in the form of arms, and the Saudi Arabians did have a role as they are Sunni and have always believed in spreading their form of Islam. The beginnings of Al Qaeda as described above are stupidly simplified in typical hater form. The mess that remains today is a much more muddled pile of a mess than portrayed above, as most conflicts are.

Hater likes his conflicts with his good guys and bad guys but... it just is not that simple. It almost never is.
The twists and turns of these conflicts are rarely predictable. The leaders and the backstabbing between the groups that form these organizations is not nice, neat, and predictable. We did get what we wanted, Russia out. But when the Taliban would not hand over Bin Laden, we stuck our foot in a cesspool. And the world, including the Russians, was with our intervention to try and get him.

The US fruit business has been incredibly destabilizing in Central and South America. Big business getting into big government.

[Spurtacular]

The above is such a distorted pile of crap its not worth commenting on except on our role and the general randomness of these ordeals.

We definitely did supply money, mostly in the form of arms, and the Saudi Arabians did have a role as they are Sunni and have always believed in spreading their form of Islam. The beginnings of Al Qaeda as described above are stupidly simplified in typical hater form. The mess that remains today is a much more muddled pile of a mess than portrayed above, as most conflicts are.

Hater likes his conflicts with his good guys and bad guys but... it just is not that simple. It almost never is.
The twists and turns of these conflicts are rarely predictable. The leaders and the backstabbing between the groups that form these organizations is not nice, neat, and predictable. We did get what we wanted, Russia out. But when the Taliban would not hand over Bin Laden, we stuck our foot in a cesspool. And the world, including the Russians, was with our intervention to try and get him.

The US fruit business has been incredibly destabilizing in Central and South America. Big business getting into big government.

:cry Muh spoonfed narrative :cry

:lmao Less Than Blake :lmao

[TheGreatYacht]

We did create al qaeda to fight tbe soviets and we did host bin laden here at the Cia and armed him and trained him tbqh


https://youtu.be/O5wsaVadNbQ

[hater]

:cry Muh spoonfed narrative :cry

:lmao Less Than Blake :lmao

:lol urine garden

Come to my garden an d urinate :lol

[TheGreatYacht]

Dumbest Thing Ever Said On Meet The Press by Feminists and Their Blatant Hypocrisy on Tulsi Gabbard

https://youtu.be/usgG4zMRM14

[Psychopav Chump]

Dumbest Thing Ever Said On Meet The Press by Feminists and Their Blatant Hypocrisy on Tulsi Gabbard

https://youtu.be/usgG4zMRM14

It's a video. It doesn't count.

[AaronY]

1182282461859811328

Yass Queen! Slay em all!!1!

[AaronY]

relevant data


Tulsi would be leading right now if Hillary didn't have all the superdelegates

[AaronY]

Seriously though this is going to go over great on all her Fox News appearances and she might even pick up more of the alt-right wing bloc of the Democratic primary voters so good on her

[hater]

https://twitter.com/bigbill_ontw/status/1182313882238537729?s=19

[hater]

Tulsi on a crusade against DNC devils :tu

God bless her brave heart

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi Calls Out CNN To Their Face!

https://youtu.be/O_iJsy-bJ-k

[hater]

Tulsi on a crusade against DNC devils :tu

God bless her brave heart

[hater]

If Tulsi qualifies for next debate she needs to take a shit on a couple of the DNC stooges like Klobuchocha or buttholeface or even Pocahontas

Nothing to lose

Just don't waste your time on losers like kagala or betakus :lol they have zero chance :lol

[hater]

Oh and who da fuck is Tom sawyer?

There was a old geezer at the debate flaunting that he was a rich fu k

Lmao Tom sawyer fuck that clown

[koriwhat]

If Tulsi qualifies for next debate she needs to take a shit on a couple of the DNC stooges like Klobuchocha or buttholeface or even Pocahontas

Nothing to lose

Just don't waste your time on losers like kagala or betakus :lol they have zero chance :lol

got to love how CNN cuts Tulsi off when she states she wants to hear Warren's comments on certain issues. fuck the clown media!

[hater]

got to love how CNN cuts Tulsi off when she states she wants to hear Warren's comments on certain issues. fuck the clown media!

I heard about that. Anyone got a clip off that?

Tulsi is doing fine she will be a beast in 2024 unless she gets taken out by elite before.

IMO she's a socialist libertarian which is the same thing I am

[FrostKing]

Better looking than AOC

[koriwhat]

I heard about that. Anyone got a clip off that?

Tulsi is doing fine she will be a beast in 2024 unless she gets taken out by elite before.

IMO she's a socialist libertarian which is the same thing I am

she's the only one worth a fuck on that panel... as for being a socialist anything i am not ok with that but whatever. she has moxie no doubt and i applaud her for having a spine when the others lack one.

[hater]

she's the only one worth a fuck on that panel... as for being a socialist anything i am not ok with that but whatever. she has moxie no doubt and i applaud her for having a spine when the others lack one.

:tu

[hater]

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1184963863931805696?s=19

[hater]

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1184942902608195584?s=19

[koriwhat]

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1184963863931805696?s=19

yes please! fuck california! actually i like california but the people there are delusional loons.

[hater]

I heard about that. Anyone got a clip off that?

Tulsi is doing fine she will be a beast in 2024 unless she gets taken out by elite before.

IMO she's a socialist libertarian which is the same thing I am

Found it at 1:04

:wow :wow

f7-9qF0sMyk

[koriwhat]

Found it at 1:04

:wow :wow

f7-9qF0sMyk

i don't remember the exact statement and it might be this one but i don't believe it is. they didn't really pan to warren when asked to explain herself by tulsi but they panned to the moderators who were like "break break break.... you're done!"

it was quite sickening how they cut tulsi off but none of the rest of them. you can def tell who shakes that party up and who they want silenced.

[DMC]

Brave soul. I'd like to run roughshod, raw dog up in them skins. No disrespect.

[TheGreatYacht]

https://youtu.be/d3aueuYVjoc

[TheGreatYacht]

https://youtu.be/X4-lk9HZ09s

[Pavlov]

Those pockmarks tho.

[Chumpette]

https://youtu.be/X4-lk9HZ09s

She's not courageous enough to live stream a dental cleaning. I cannot vote for her.

[DMC]

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1184963863931805696?s=19

I'd be ok with it.

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1184963863931805696?s=19

Isn't that part of the Democrat platform to give California to Mexico?

[TheGreatYacht]

She's not courageous enough to live stream a dental cleaning. I cannot vote for her.

:lol

[cd021]

Better looking than AOC

She's fine but she aint AOC fine, c'mon.

[cd021]

Isn't she the chick who railed against the DNC for making it next to impossible to qualify for a debate because of the impossibly high standards of getting 2% in 2 polls? :lol

Even out of the 20+ candidates, she was always in the bottom tear.

[in2deep]

Isn't she the chick who railed against the DNC for making it next to impossible to qualify for a debate because of the impossibly high standards of getting 2% in 2 polls? :lol

Even out of the 20+ candidates, she was always in the bottom tear.

No

She got over 2% in like a dozen polls. She was pissed because DNC arbitrarily chooses WHICH polls count and which don't. Without any rhyme or reason.

[in2deep]

She's not courageous enough to live stream a dental cleaning. I cannot vote for her.

:lol

[cd021]

No

She got over 2% in like a dozen polls. She was pissed because DNC arbitrarily chooses WHICH polls count and which don't. Without any rhyme or reason.

They listed the polls ahead of time. Its not like she got blindsided, 10 candidates did make the stage- the DNC wasn't rigged against them but her? That's pretty silly tbh. She did qualify for this past debate using similar criteria. The DNC was rigged against her the last time but not this time?

[in2deep]

They listed the polls ahead of time. Its not like she got blindsided, 10 candidates did make the stage- the DNC wasn't rigged against them but her? That's pretty silly tbh. She did qualify for this past debate using similar criteria. The DNC was rigged against her the last time but not this time?

No. They did not list which polls counted and which did not. That's the problem.they also don't post anywhere their criteria of deciding how a poll counts

[cd021]

No. They did not list which polls counted and which did not. That's the problem.they also don't post anywhere their criteria of deciding how a poll counts

They did, I remember reading about the polls that the DNC listed back in August and September. She just didn't qualify and blamed the DNC.

For the November debate, the DNC announced the qualifications almost a month ago

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/dnc-raises-qualification-threshold-november-debate-n1057751



To qualify, candidates will need to hit 3 percent support in at least four early state or national polls that meet the DNC’s methodological requirements, up from 2 percent for the September and October debates.


Gabbard has never hit 3 percent in a qualifying poll.

If she doesn't qualify for the November debate, will she rail against the DNC for her not being popular enough to clear 3% in 4 polls? Frankly, it probably should be at least 5% to cut it down to five candidates. Its clearly between Warren, Sanders and Bernie, with the rest of them just hanging around.

[in2deep]

They did, I remember reading about the polls that the DNC listed back in August and September. She just didn't qualify and blamed the DNC.

For the November debate, the DNC announced the qualifications almost a month ago

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/dnc-raises-qualification-threshold-november-debate-n1057751






If she doesn't qualify for the November debate, will she rail against the DNC for her not being popular enough to clear 3% in 4 polls? Frankly, it probably should be at least 5% to cut it down to five candidates. Its clearly between Warren, Sanders and Bernie, with the rest of them just hanging around.

No no

They listed the qualifying polls after the fact to show who qualified. They did not list them before the polls were taken and they don't have a complete list of which polls 2ould count and which would not. They also again I say, never posted their logic to decide how a poll is valid or not.

That is a big problem as they basically can count or discount polls at will. The DNC is shady as fuck especially since what happened to Bernie last year so they need to be called out.

Tulsi and Yang are the only ones with balls

[CosmicCowboy]

LOL Hillary claims the Russians are backing Tulsi to run as a third party.


ormer Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asserted that the Russians are attempting to undermine the 2020 election by backing Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii) as a third-party candidate, stating “she’s the favorite of the Russians.”

Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Clinton made a number of claims regarding Russian meddling in U.S. elections, including that Gabbard’s substantial social-media support relies on Russian bots. Gabbard was the most-searched candidate after the first and second Democratic debates.

“I think they’ve got their eye on someone who’s currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate,” Clinton said on the podcast. “She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”

[hater]

:lol Shitlery

She's a vengeful bitch and never forgave Tulsi from not supporting her in 2016

Another reason to love Tulsi :tu

and another reason to be glad Trump won :tu

[spurraider21]

rcp average has her at 1.2%, behind booker and steyer :lol...

[DMC]

:lol Shitlery

She's a vengeful bitch and never forgave Tulsi from not supporting her in 2016

Another reason to love Tulsi :tu

and another reason to be glad Trump won :tu

Hater in the darkroom eyes tightly closed swinging wildly hitting everyone.

[hater]

Hater in the darkroom eyes wide open swinging wildly hitting every establishment liberal/neocon.

Fixed it for ya ma nig :tu

[hater]

rcp average has her at 1.2%, behind booker and steyer :lol...

Wasn't that Trump's chance in 2016? :lmao

BTW Tulsi is priming herself for 2024. This is just a test run :tu

[SnakeBoy]

Those pockmarks tho.

lol Tulsi doesn't meet Chumps standards

[Pavlov]

LOL Hillary claims the Russians are backing Tulsi to run as a third party.Well, they do seem to like Tulsi. Wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility tbh.

[Pavlov]

lol Tulsi doesn't meet Chumps standardsDo you like her pockmarks?

You think they're sexy?

lol

She's pretty good looking otherwise.

[SnakeBoy]

Do you like her pockmarks?

You think they're sexy?

lol

She's a good looking women.

[Pavlov]

She's a good looking women.Just one last I checked.

[spurraider21]

tusli's good looking imo

[DMC]

Pretty sure Tulsi is that old debul. She been put up to the task by Satan. She sent to get in the way of Warren, to be a roadblock for her but God won't put more on her plate than she can handle. Warren will lead us to Salvation.

[SnakeBoy]

Just one last I checked.

lol only the most perfect woman will do for the forum spellchecker

[hater]

Lol chump

[Pavlov]

lol only the most perfect woman will do for the forum spellcheckerRelax, it's a joke.

She's a good looking woman with bad skin. It happens.

:lol ST posters getting defensive about a politician's skin.

[DMC]

Relax, it's a joke.

She's a good looking woman with bad skin. It happens.

:lol ST posters getting defensive about a politician's skin.

What about those elbows?

[SpursforSix]

LOL Hillary claims the Russians are backing Tulsi to run as a third party.

Just saw this. WTF.

[Pavlov]

What about those elbows?Don't remember seeing them. Are they worth getting defensive over?

[SnakeBoy]

Damn

1185289626409406464

[clambake]

Damn

1185289626409406464

nice

[koriwhat]

Damn

1185289626409406464

:tu

[spurraider21]

i like that first tweet, but then she gets delusional tbh...

1185289629148291078

like brah, ur 10th or whatever in the polls... "between you and me... forget the other people ahead of me"

[ElNono]

The realest WW3 tbh

[Reck]

i like that first tweet, but then she gets delusional tbh...

1185289629148291078

like brah, ur 10th or whatever in the polls... "between you and me... forget the other people ahead of me"

Having confidence is a must if you want to succeed but lol this bitch giving herself that much credit is hilarious.

:lol Also inviting Hillary to join the race.

[AaronY]

like brah, ur 10th or whatever in the polls... "between you and me... forget the other people ahead of me"
shes only 10th in the rigged fake polls

[ducks]

If trump said the same thing you liberal would blast him

[CosmicCowboy]

I think it was a brilliant response. She may have just made herself relevant in this primary.

[AaronY]

I think it was a brilliant response. She may have just made herself relevant in this primary.
lol

[Reck]

I think it was a brilliant response. She may have just made herself relevant in this primary.

How? If she left the first tweet alone...

[spurraider21]

shes only 10th in the rigged fake polls
yeah i heard she cracked 2.2% in the real ones

[baseline bum]

I think it was a brilliant response. She may have just made herself relevant in this primary.

First part was when she shit all over Clinton, next two not so much.

[cd021]

No no

They listed the qualifying polls after the fact to show who qualified. They did not list them before the polls were taken and they don't have a complete list of which polls 2ould count and which would not. They also again I say, never posted their logic to decide how a poll is valid or not.

That is a big problem as they basically can count or discount polls at will. The DNC is shady as fuck especially since what happened to Bernie last year so they need to be called out.

Tulsi and Yang are the only ones with balls

They did list the actual polls, I remember reading them in an article well before the start of debate that she didn't qualify for. IIRC Monmouth
and Quinnipiac were among the polls that were listed. It's B.S. that she's railing against the DNC for her not being popular enough.

The DNC did Bernie dirty, but not Tulsi in this case tbh.

Gabbard is a poor candidate tbh, Harris and Klobuchar are in the same boat tbh. She never had a lane to gain traction in the nomination process.

She better not bitch when she can't get 3% in polls for the November debate.

[CosmicCowboy]

First part was when she shit all over Clinton, next two not so much.

She just shifted the conversation to US sponsored regime change...at least for the next couple of news cycles. That's a win/win for her.

[CosmicCowboy]

Hillary owns Libya.

"We came, We saw, He died." Gigglegigglegiggle

[AaronY]

yeah i heard she cracked 2.2% in the real ones
all kidding aside, i wish her the best of luck. godwilling she can get herself a Fox News show out of this. i already got the dvr set for when she goes on tucker tomorrow and they giggle about the tweet

[koriwhat]

They did list the actual polls, I remember reading them in an article well before the start of debate that she didn't qualify for. IIRC Monmouth
and Quinnipiac were among the polls that were listed. It's B.S. that she's railing against the DNC for her not being popular enough.

The DNC did Bernie dirty, but not Tulsi in this case tbh.

Gabbard is a poor candidate tbh, Harris and Klobuchar are in the same boat tbh. She never had a lane to gain traction in the nomination process.

She better not bitch when she can't get 3% in polls for the November debate.

all i want to know is who are they actually polling, how many in this demographic and how many in that demographic, where are the people from in the polls, etc? these DNC polls are straight up bullshit just like they were in 2016 and prior. a make believe platform is the embodiment of the democratic party.

[Reck]

She just shifted the conversation to US sponsored regime change...at least for the next couple of news cycles. That's a win/win for her.

This will do nothing for her poor poll numbers.

[Spurtacular]

i like that first tweet, but then she gets delusional tbh...

1185289629148291078

like brah, ur 10th or whatever in the polls... "between you and me... forget the other people ahead of me"

Establishment ain't attacking her like she's in 10th. Makes one wonder what the real numbers are.

[CosmicCowboy]

This will do nothing for her poor poll numbers.

It's almost a guarantee her poll numbers will go up after this.

[spurraider21]

Establishment ain't attacking her like she's in 10th. Makes one wonder what the real numbers are.
pick a poll, any poll

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html#polls

[spurraider21]

It's almost a guarantee her poll numbers will go up after this.
unlikely tbh... biden loyalists are largely hillary loyalists. they're not budging over this. the anti-establishment vote is basically bernie. warren is somewhere in between. unless tulsi is about to winner over bernie supporters (she wont), i dont see how this does anything good for her

[CosmicCowboy]

Meh...we will know monday, wont we?

[Reck]

It's almost a guarantee her poll numbers will go up after this.

I asked you how earlier and you didn't respond. How is an irrelevant politician like Hillary going to elevate Tulsi? She's not even in the race. lol

[DMC]

I read the assertions differently. I see it as Hillary saying Russia is trying to bolster her to get her to run 3rd party to act as a spoiler to the Dems, but not that Tulsi is in cohoots, but Hillary doesn't say she isn't also. Russian bots could bolster any candidate and possibly even coax someone, through polling numbers affected by bots, to consider running as a 3rd party candidate to get away from the DNC who will no doubt shit on TG to push Warren forward, as they did against Bernie. Maybe I'm wrong, but accusing a politician on your side of being a Russian plant is pretty egregious of an offense, and I'd be surprised if that what's meant by it.

[Spurtacular]

pick a poll, any poll

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html#polls

:cry Muh submission polls :cry

:lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

I asked you how earlier and you didn't respond. How is an irrelevant politician like Hillary going to elevate Tulsi? She's not even in the race. lol

Your questions are hardly response worthy but since its friday I will humor you. Hillary Clinton is not even close to being irrelevant, and yes, she can get a story planted in the New York Times if she wants to. I still wont be surprised if her ego gets the best of her and she jumps into the game a third time.

[spurraider21]

:cry Muh submission polls :cry

:lmao
post any poll you want tbh, i figured providing you with a list of 20+ would be a good start. but go ahead and show me a poll that shows me where tulsi is really at instead of all these fake polls

[Spurtacular]

post any poll you want tbh, i figured providing you with a list of 20+ would be a good start. but go ahead and show me a poll that shows me where tulsi is really at instead of all these fake polls

They're all bull shit, lite. Polls showing Gabbard winning debate and/or being top three, and the made-up polls don't reflect that. If your polls were the truth, the system wouldn't be trying to pile on Gabbard. They'd just leave her to rot.

[AaronY]

Dem primary would be such a hilarious shit show if Hillary ran i almost want her to do it lol

[Spurs Homer]

I see this waaay differently....

Hrc called trumps treason way before anyone else and she has been proven 100 percent correct.
this alone makes her comments worth paying attention to -

she is basically saying putin is already doing bot campaigns to support gabbard - (this bears out on twitter/facebook already)

putin propping tulsi as a spoiler candidate makes perfect sense to keep his manchurian candidate in power

have tulsi steal just enough votes to make putin/trumps cheating draw less attention


tulsi has never mustered the balls to actually denounce putin

tulsi - whom i really like - unfortunately-

could have answered this hrc innuendo by denouncing russia/putin but the really really disturbing thing to me that tulsi did?


she attacked hrc using RUSSIAN talking points!!!


she read directly from the trumputin playbook in her response


i would absolutely put this round as belonging to hrc - whom no one likes - but she called trumps treason, she got royally fucked by russia and trump and - russia managed to brainwash the trump cult so successfully -


that they still havent been able to break free - just read these cultists russian talking points here 24/7

[DMC]

The realest WW3 tbh

hater called it

[CosmicCowboy]

Oh please. Hillary owns the fuck out of creating the next jihadist sanctuary in Libya. She is the fucking queen. You should really google that you tube of her cackling and gloating over gadaffi getting killed by the mob.

[koriwhat]

I see this waaay differently....

Hrc called trumps treason way before anyone else and she has been proven 100 percent correct.
this alone makes her comments worth paying attention to -

she is basically saying putin is already doing bot campaigns to support gabbard - (this bears out on twitter/facebook already)

putin propping tulsi as a spoiler candidate makes perfect sense to keep his manchurian candidate in power

have tulsi steal just enough votes to make putin/trumps cheating draw less attention


tulsi has never mustered the balls to actually denounce putin

tulsi - whom i really like - unfortunately-

could have answered this hrc innuendo by denouncing russia/putin but the really really disturbing thing to me that tulsi did?


she attacked hrc using RUSSIAN talking points!!!


she read directly from the trumputin playbook in her response


i would absolutely put this round as belonging to hrc - whom no one likes - but she called trumps treason, she got royally fucked by russia and trump and - russia managed to brainwash the trump cult so successfully -


that they still havent been able to break free - just read these cultists russian talking points here 24/7

you obviously have no clue of fusion's script from when mccain ran... same old russian plot line!

[DMC]

I see this waaay differently....

Hrc called trumps treason way before anyone else and she has been proven 100 percent correct.
this alone makes her comments worth paying attention to -

:lol no


she is basically saying putin is already doing bot campaigns to support gabbard - (this bears out on twitter/facebook already)

You have no idea if it does or doesn't.


putin propping tulsi as a spoiler candidate makes perfect sense to keep his manchurian candidate in power

Conspiracy theories good now!


have tulsi steal just enough votes to make putin/trumps cheating draw less attention

Steal votes? You mean your candidate cannot motivate her base to vote for her?


tulsi has never mustered the balls to actually denounce putin

You never denied being a homosexual


tulsi - whom i really like - unfortunately-

could have answered this hrc innuendo by denouncing russia/putin but the really really disturbing thing to me that tulsi did?

You like her but she's not as good as your girl Hillary.. #stillwithher


she attacked hrc using RUSSIAN talking points!!!

Yeah, no one ever thought of saying those things.


she read directly from the trumputin playbook in her response

Or she's been posting here.


i would absolutely put this round as belonging to hrc - whom no one likes - but she called trumps treason, she got royally fucked by russia and trump and - russia managed to brainwash the trump cult so successfully -


that they still havent been able to break free - just read these cultists russian talking points here 24/7

You, RG and Boots should team up and become the Three Retards. You're already the three retards but you'd get a formal proper noun as a name.

:lmao admitting your party can be played like a fiddle by Putin

[Spurs Homer]

you obviously have no clue of fusion's script from when mccain ran... same old russian plot line!


you obviously subscribe to batshit crazy conspiracies and reveal how stupid you are by doing so

[DMC]

you obviously subscribe to batshit crazy conspiracies and reveal how stupid you are by doing so



putin propping tulsi as a spoiler candidate makes perfect sense to keep his manchurian candidate in power


:lmao

[koriwhat]

you obviously subscribe to batshit crazy conspiracies and reveal how stupid you are by doing so

nah you're just a fucking retard who has too much air between your ears and not enough brains tbh. keep pushing that russian conspiracy though you fucking nut. :tu

[Spurs Homer]

:lol no

You have no idea if it does or doesn't.

Conspiracy theories good now!

Steal votes? You mean your candidate cannot motivate her base to vote for her?

You never denied being a homosexual

You like her but she's not as good as your girl Hillary.. #stillwithher

Yeah, no one ever thought of saying those things.

Or she's been posting here.


You, RG and Boots should team up and become the Three Retards. You're already the three retards but you'd get a formal proper noun as a name.

:lmao admitting your party can be played like a fiddle by Putin


i dont have a party -

but after seeing crimes and evidence and treasonous behavior by this administration in plain view - and STILL

supporting the russian asset-

it is clear who putin made fools of -history will not be kind to you when you wake up from your brainwashing

[koriwhat]

i dont have a party -

but after seeing crimes and evidence and treasonous behavior by this administration in plain view - and STILL

supporting the russian asset-

it is clear who putin made fools of -history will not be kind to you when you wake up from your brainwashing

:lmao russia, russia, russia!

[DMC]

i dont have a party -

but after seeing crimes and evidence and treasonous behavior by this administration in plain view - and STILL

supporting the russian asset-

it is clear who putin made fools of -history will not be kind to you when you wake up from your brainwashing

:lmao SURE!

[Spurtacular]

Oh please. Hillary owns the fuck out of creating the next jihadist sanctuary in Libya. She is the fucking queen. You should really google that you tube of her cackling and gloating over gadaffi getting killed by the mob.

You think the Chumpettes haven't seen that?

[Spurtacular]

Dem primary would be such a hilarious shit show if Hillary ran i almost want her to do it lol

The funny part would be watching the Chumpettes do a 180 on sperm shielding for her, tbh.

[cd021]

all i want to know is who are they actually polling, how many in this demographic and how many in that demographic, where are the people from in the polls, etc? these DNC polls are straight up bullshit just like they were in 2016 and prior. a make believe platform is the embodiment of the democratic party.

If you are going to ask that then why not of every poll ever released. Monmouth and Quinnipiac are pretty reputable tbh and the DNC was pretty transparent about the polls that they accepted. There couldn't be any overlap in people polled, they counted polls in early voting states like New Hampshire and Iowa and polls from the big news places like ABC, NBC, CBS etc. I'm sure they poll registered or likely Democratic voters.

She didn't clear 2% in any of them. That's remarkably bad. They even did her a solid by counting polls from weeks ago to let people like her make this past debate stage IIRC. Gabbard is barely even a fringe candidate yet acts like the DNC owes her something. I don't want to hear her shit when she doesn't qualify for the November debate despite the DNC releasing the criteria on September 22nd.

[Reck]

Your questions are hardly response worthy but since its friday I will humor you. Hillary Clinton is not even close to being irrelevant, and yes, she can get a story planted in the New York Times if she wants to. I still wont be surprised if her ego gets the best of her and she jumps into the game a third time.

:lmao

You've been saying Hillary is going to run again for years. It's not gonna happen.

[spurraider21]

They're all bull shit, lite. Polls showing Gabbard winning debate and/or being top three, and the made-up polls don't reflect that. If your polls were the truth, the system wouldn't be trying to pile on Gabbard. They'd just leave her to rot.
how do you know those arent the fake ones?

[koriwhat]

:lol i'll believe in polls when they aren't in favor of the dem party tbh. what were hillary's chances of the presidency the day of? :lmao

[spurraider21]

:lol i'll believe in polls when they aren't in favor of the dem party tbh. what were hillary's chances of the presidency the day of? :lmao
538 had her about 70% on election day

they had her winning the popular vote 48.5 to 45, she won 48.2 to 46.1

[koriwhat]

538 had her about 70% on election day

they had her winning the popular vote 48.5 to 45, she won 48.2 to 46.1

madam what again?

[spurraider21]

madam what again?
what's the confusion?

why would you discredit polls showing democrats getting more votes than republicans when in general elections, democrats have fairly consistently gotten more votes than republicans in the last ~30 years?

[Pavlov]

the peace candidate

649615636088365058

[koriwhat]

what's the confusion?

why would you discredit polls showing democrats getting more votes than republicans when in general elections, democrats have fairly consistently gotten more votes than republicans in the last ~30 years?

i laugh because idgaf about the popular vote, which was rigged in the first place, and neither does our government nor presidential elections.

[spurraider21]

i laugh because idgaf about the popular vote, which was rigged in the first place, and neither does our government nor presidential elections.
but thats what the polls specifically look at... its people who participate in polls, not the states. so are you really challenging the accuracy of the polls? doesnt seem like it.

what makes you say the popular vote was rigged?

[koriwhat]

but thats what the polls specifically look at... its people who participate in polls, not the states

well those polls were straight bullshit tbh and even a dem himself testified against the rigged popular vote. it's comical how so many of yall believe our government and those in power are squeaky clean except for trump.

[spurraider21]

well those polls were straight bullshit tbh and even a dem himself testified against the rigged popular vote. it's comical how so many of yall believe our government and those in power are squeaky clean except for trump.
i mean you call the polls bullshit but they poll for the popular vote and they were pretty accurate tbh. you may well question their usefulness in predicting the outcome of the EC, but with respect to what they actually measure, they were pretty accurate

as to the bolded... link?

[koriwhat]

i mean you call the polls bullshit but they poll for the popular vote and they were pretty accurate tbh. you may well question their usefulness in predicting the outcome of the EC, but with respect to what they actually measure, they were pretty accurate

as to the bolded... link?

has to do with bigTech and well voter manipulation in the form of 2+ million votes.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzF7nBmwPso

[SnakeBoy]

the peace candidate

649615636088365058

Man she really has you rattled. You know she's polling around 1% right.

[Reck]

the peace candidate

649615636088365058

This is about the time all her old tweets get retweeted and thrown back at her. :lol

[spurraider21]

has to do with bigTech and well voter manipulation in the form of 2+ million votes.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzF7nBmwPso
there's no way to quantify how many people's votes are influenced though, thats the same shit with russian trolls, etc.

this is your evidence for the popular vote of the general election being rigged?

[pgardn]

there's no way to quantify how many people's votes are influenced though, thats the same shit with russian trolls, etc.

this is your evidence for the popular vote of the general election being rigged?

Yep.

A rigging of 2 million votes...
Unexplained, it just is because... Trump says so.

[dabom6]

Is hater a russian troll? :lol :lol

[dabom6]

He's always toeing the russhite company line from hillary is a warmonger/ww3/evil bullshit and rolling with tulsi early on. It's easy to notice him now. :lol

The russhites hate Hillary cause she the only one that doesnt play that shit with ruskys. :lol

[Spurtacular]

538 had her about 70% on election day

they had her winning the popular vote 48.5 to 45, she won 48.2 to 46.1

Submission polls.

Why would a dishonest system produce honest polls?

[hater]

He's always toeing the russhite company line from hillary is a warmonger/ww3/evil bullshit and rolling with tulsi early on. It's easy to notice him now. :lol

The russhites hate Hillary cause she the only one that doesnt play that shit with ruskys. :lol

You sound like a 5 year old tbqh

If you were old enough, you would remember Shitler obliterated Libya, turned it into a hell hole where they have slave auctions and then joked about it by saying "we came, we bombed, he died"

I feel sorry for you if you believe Shitler is nothing more than a blood soaked war criminal

[dabom6]

You sound like a 5 year old tbqh

If you were old enough, you would remember Shitler obliterated Libya, turned it into a hell hole where they have slave auctions and then joked about it by saying "we came, we bombed, he died"

I feel sorry for you if you believe Shitler is nothing more than a blood soaked war criminal

Caught you red handed faggot. :lmao

[hater]

Caught you red handed faggot. :lmao

Though so

You are 5 years old.

[dabom6]

Though so

You are 5 years old.

You spout nothing but rushitte propaganda. Just calling it like it is. :tu

[hater]

You spout nothing but rushitte propaganda. Just calling it like it is. :tu

I spout peace propaganda ma niega something that American propaganda channels don't know. Wake up and realize you are brainwashed hard

I really wish you will wake up soon

Good luck to you

[dabom6]

I spout peace propaganda ma niega something that American propaganda channels don't know. Wake up and realize you are brainwashed hard

I really wish you will wake up soon

Good luck to you

I've never seen you actively talk shit about pudding. :lol

I'm just putting it out there for people to judge.

[spurraider21]

Submission polls.

Why would a dishonest system produce honest polls?
whats a "submission poll" and please provide examples of these legitimate polls where tulsi is doing so much better

[hater]

I've never seen you actively talk shit about pudding. :lol

I'm just putting it out there for people to judge.

And that's fine tbqh

All I'm saying is a world where USA is by far the #1 power is a real shit world. just look at the last 25 years in the middle east.

So Im all for a mutipolar world. where there are 2 or 3 big powers that will have to check each other. This IMO is a better more peaceful world

[Spurtacular]

whats a "submission poll" and please provide examples of these legitimate polls where tulsi is doing so much better

I don't take stock in the rigged polls. The establishment has been exposed.

You should look up what a submission poll is; it might start the process of taking your head out of your ass. But that's a faint hope, tbh.

[boutons_deux]

Hilarious how Jill Stein another Russian agent jumps to defend Tulsi against Hillary

[SpursforSix]

whats a "submission poll" and please provide examples of these legitimate polls where tulsi is doing so much better

Bend over, I’ll fucking show you a submission pole.

[DMC]

Bend over, I’ll fucking show you a submission pole.

:lol

[spurraider21]

I don't take stock in the rigged polls. The establishment has been exposed.

You should look up what a submission poll is; it might start the process of taking your head out of your ass. But that's a faint hope, tbh.
:lmao please do my research for me :lmao

Can’t answer a simple question about his own comment or provide me with one of the “real polls” showing how well tulsi is doing

[LkrFan]

:cry calling it now. If she runs she will be a force tobe reckoned with :cry

Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi!

USA! USA! USA!

https://twitter.com/cassandrarules/status/1069705864511139840?s=21

She's the brunette version of TomiPERIOD

[hater]

:lmao "queen of the warmongers"

Tulsi went in raw on Shitler :lol


https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1185350974501617664?s=19

[Pavlov]

Tucker Carlson.

Oh.

[hater]

^ #stillwithher


:lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmao you're with Tulsi?

[hater]

^ #stillwithher


:lmao

Still with Hillary :lol

[Spurs Homer]

I still dont see klobuchar, kamala, warren respond...


hrc never mentioned tulsi by name....

tulsi responds with putin scripted attacks....


hmmmm

comrade hater the ruskie cheerleader lol

[Pavlov]

Still with Hillary :lolNope. I'd prefer she go away.

You're with a cult member.

:lmao

:lol

[CosmicCowboy]

He's always toeing the russhite company line from hillary is a warmonger/ww3/evil bullshit and rolling with tulsi early on. It's easy to notice him now. :lol

The russhites hate Hillary cause she the only one that doesnt play that shit with ruskys. :lol

Reset button???? :lmao

[dabom6]

Reset button???? :lmao



Democrats were losing power over the years with Obama. Orange shit stain basically accelerated a growth for Democrats for the next 20 years. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Reset button???? :lmaoBetter than Trump's surrender button tbh.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

It's interesting watching local conservatives supporting Gabbard mostly because they find her attractive. Complete with conspiritard wishcasting.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Now it makes sense completely. She rejects you guys too so it all must seem so normal.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/rep-tulsi-gabbard-gets-2020-endorsement-from-david-duke-2019-10-19

Democratic presidential hopeful Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has apparently gotten an endorsement she said she can do without — from former KKK leader David Duke.

The 68-year-old white supremacist and former GOP Louisiana state senator plastered a banner on his Twitter page prominently featuring a photograph of the Hawaiian lawmaker, the New York Post reported.

“Tulsi Gabbard for President,” it blares, along with the tagline: “Finally a candidate who will actually put America First rather than Israel First!”

“Tulsi Gabbard is currently the only Presidential candidate who doesn’t want to send White children off to die for Israel,” the former Grand Wizard tweeted his more than 50,000 followers along with a photograph of Gabbard meeting a US service member and his child.

But Gabbard wasted no time in lashing back at Duke and rejected his backing.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao please do my research for me :lmao

Can’t answer a simple question about his own comment or provide me with one of the “real polls” showing how well tulsi is doing

Of course I can answer. But the fact that you don't know shows how naive you are in general. Stay naive; it's what you do.

[spurraider21]

Of course I can answer. But the fact that you don't know shows how naive you are in general. Stay naive; it's what you do.
It’s pretty clear you can’t given your dodging

[Spurtacular]

It’s pretty clear you can’t given your dodging

Why is it somehow a point of pride for you that I spoon feed you?

[hater]

I still dont see klobuchar, kamala, warren respond...


hrc never mentioned tulsi by name....

tulsi responds with putin scripted attacks....


hmmmm

comrade hater the ruskie cheerleader lol

Shitlers spokeswoman said it's Tulsi dumbo

[ducks]

CNN, MSNBC avoid Clinton's wild Gabbard conspiracy theory during primetime

[koriwhat]

I don't take stock in the rigged polls. The establishment has been exposed.

spot on. :tu


Hilarious how Jill Stein another Russian agent jumps to defend Tulsi against Hillary

everyone's a russian asset but hillary! :lmao

must suck going through life scared that the russians are everywhere. what a loser mentality and a sad existence.

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi Lashes Back At NYT Smear Article In Dem Debate

https://youtu.be/Hco0RW9gimk

[Pavlov]

She pretty much has to run third party now. Hope she gets primaried tbh.

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

spot on. :tu



everyone's a russian asset but hillary! :lmao

must suck going through life scared that the russians are everywhere. what a loser mentality and a sad existence.
Just like how you shit your pants over Muslims :lmao

Your lack of self awareness is just mind boggling

[koriwhat]

Just like how you shit your pants over Muslims :lmao

Your lack of self awareness is just mind boggling

you keep claiming this but i'm not afraid of muslims one bit nor do i shy away from them in public. i have a corner store across the street from me that i visit regularly and it's ran by nothing but muslims.

you're a fucking idiot and a weak fucking troll too. :tu

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

you keep claiming this but i'm not afraid of muslims one bit nor do i shy away from them in public. i have a corner store across the street from me that i visit regularly and it's ran by nothing but muslims.

you're a fucking idiot and a weak fucking troll too. :tu
I bet you have a Muslim best friend too! :lmao

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

btw on topic, is this the shit we gotta deal with from now on? Every time a shitty candidate gets desperate for attention, they just pull the “:cry it’s rigged :cry” card?

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

and koriwhat is a gayboy

[Spurtacular]

I bet you have a Muslim best friend too! :lmao

I bet you have a fruity friend, tbh.

[spurraider21]

CNN, MSNBC avoid Clinton's wild Gabbard conspiracy theory during primetime
they realize clinton is irrelevant. maybe you should too

[Chucho]

The "you're still fixated on her 3 years later, we've moved on" spend inane amounts of time arguing with the people they claim are still fixated on her and are going out of their way to give credence to the "you're still with her" people.

Det consistency. :lol

[koriwhat]

I bet you have a Muslim best friend too! :lmao

And I bet you're still a faggot.

as well, it's funny you tucked your tail between your legs you weak fuck!

[Spurtacular]

The "you're still fixated on her 3 years later, we've moved on" spend inane amounts of time arguing with the people they claim are still fixated on her and are going out of their way to give credence to the "you're still with her" people.

Det consistency. :lol


:lmao Chumpettes went all in on this psychopath.

[koriwhat]

The "you're still fixated on her 3 years later, we've moved on" spend inane amounts of time arguing with the people they claim are still fixated on her and are going out of their way to give credence to the "you're still with her" people.

Det consistency. :lol

chucho, just an observation but you're obsessed with Spurt just like you claim he's obsessed with everyone. for the past couple weeks i've noticed the pattern of you jumping to the chance to be the #1 reply to anything Spurt has to say. as well, you try your hardest to put him down but here you are doing exactly what you bitch and moan about. it's quite the ironic situation you've gotten yourself into and as much as most here want to claim i have no self-awareness you sir definitely have none. :tu

[hater]

Democratic Party is terrified of this fucking beast:

https://twitter.com/The_Ryan_King88/status/1185988414283436033

[boutons_deux]

every so-called "dialog" with rightwingnutjob Trash fellators:

https://media3.giphy.com/media/NUJZKPi2CpqpO/source.gif

why even bother?

[Chucho]

chucho, just an observation but you're obsessed with Spurt just like you claim he's obsessed with everyone. for the past couple weeks i've noticed the pattern of you jumping to the chance to be the #1 reply to anything Spurt has to say. as well, you try your hardest to put him down but here you are doing exactly what you bitch and moan about. it's quite the ironic situation you've gotten yourself into and as much as most here want to claim i have no self-awareness you sir definitely have none. :tu

LOL, coming from you, that means jack shit. You cant control yourself from attacking everyone on the board and then getting your shit packed in, only person who gets shitted on more than you is derp.

So...dont worry about me. You're too busy coming onto this board daily to get reminded your a failure, a queer with long hair and shit tattoos.

The ironic part is you bringing up everyone pointing out your severe lack of self awareness, you dipshit. You're a no one that is nowhere, but loves attention that random people have been providing him by brutally shitting all over your worthless existence you cant stop screaming into everyone's ears, you penis wrinkle.

[AaronY]

Democratic Party is terrified of this fucking beast:
lol

[koriwhat]

LOL, coming from you, that means jack shit. You cant control yourself from attacking everyone on the board and then getting your shit packed in, only person who gets shitted on more than you is derp.

So...dont worry about me. You're too busy coming onto this board daily to get reminded your a failure, a queer with long hair and shit tattoos.

The ironic part is you bringing up everyone pointing out your severe lack of self awareness, you dipshit. You're a no one that is nowhere, but loves attention that random people have been providing him by brutally shitting all over your worthless existence you cant stop screaming into everyone's ears, you penis wrinkle.

the butthurt is strong with you you old fuck. :tu

[koriwhat]

every so-called "dialog" with rightwingnutjob Trash fellators:

why even bother?

just run back into your echo chamber of a thread where you pretend we all read your rag outlet articles. :tu

[Spurtacular]

lol

Tell us why you don't like Tulsi.

[AaronY]

Tell us why you don't like Tulsi.
Because I'm a democrat.

[Spurtacular]

Because I'm a democrat.

And what un-Democrat things is Tulsi doing?

[koriwhat]

And what un-Democrat things is Tulsi doing?

going against hillary and her cronies as well as the establishment as a whole. that's what upsets the brainwashed zombies tbh.

[Spurtacular]

going against hillary and her cronies as well as the establishment as a whole. that's what upsets the brainwashed zombies tbh.

She wants to get out of the wars. That's not good for WarmongerY.

[hater]

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1185378097178140672?s=20


:lmao shitler

[DMC]

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1185378097178140672?s=20


:lmao shitler

Russian bot farm

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1185378097178140672?s=20


:lmao shitler


russian botz good now/again

[Winehole23]

background

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/tulsi-gabbard-2020-presidential-campaign.html

[hater]

Tulsi solid in most recent poll

:lmao shitler
https://twitter.com/ZachMontellaro/status/1186263643110940674?s=19

[Pavlov]

Tulsi solid in most recent poll

:lmao shitler
https://twitter.com/ZachMontellaro/status/1186263643110940674?s=19That's not solid. That is not qualifying.

Pete #3 with a bullet tho.

[hater]

^ #stillwithher :lmao

[Pavlov]

^ #stillwithher :lmaoWith whom? I only mentioned Tulsi, whose numbers from this poll aren't enough to qualify her for anything, and Pete, whose surge is pretty impressive.

[DMC]

Tulsi solid in most recent poll

:lmao shitler
https://twitter.com/ZachMontellaro/status/1186263643110940674?s=19

This post is misleading. You could put her on the very bottom and still be at the same 3%. There's no reason to rank her at the top of the 3% getters. She's not solid at all.

[DMC]

Bernie still getting shit on. This dude is like the fucking Ralph Nader of our times.

[Chucho]

Bernie still getting shit on. This dude is like the fucking Ralph Nader of our times.

Nah, Nader was a true progressive with actual progressive accomplishments. The other is a colluding, spineless, poverty pimp who thinks not combing his hair is hip and ironic.

[DMC]

Nah, Nader was a true progressive with actual progressive accomplishments. The other is a colluding, spineless, poverty pimp who thinks not combing his hair is hip and ironic.

Yeah I mean in terms of his odds of winning the presidency. Basically like Ron Paul.

[hater]

This post is misleading. You could put her on the very bottom and still be at the same 3%. There's no reason to rank her at the top of the 3% getters. She's not solid at all.

Disagree. "everyone else at or below 2 %" which means she could not possibly be at the very bottom and still be at 3%

It is solid because she is in the middle of the pack. When months ago, she was literally at the bottom.

:tu

good solid run :tu good practice for the real dance in 2024 :tu

[DMC]

Disagree. "everyone else at or below 2 %" which means she could not possibly be at the very bottom and still be at 3%

It is solid because she is in the middle of the pack. When months ago, she was literally at the bottom.

:tu

good solid run :tu good practice for the real dance in 2024 :tu

Make the same list and put her at the bottom of that list though. There's a reason they put her at the very top and it's to try to fool the eye into thinking she's at a higher rank than she is.

I don't think we'll hear about her again. Where is Jill Stein? Where's those other people from the previous election who got about 3%?

Where the fuck is Beto? :lol

[hater]

Make the same list and put her at the bottom of that list though. There's a reason they put her at the very top and it's to try to fool the eye into thinking she's at a higher rank than she is.

I don't think we'll hear about her again. Where is Jill Stein? Where's those other people from the previous election who got about 3%?

Where the fuck is Beto? :lol

huh? shes tied for 5th. The only reason she's listed first is due to the Alphabet :lol

again tied for 5th at 3% is significantly better than her polling at 1% or 2% at the bottom. It's solid :tu

I'm pretty sure we will hear from her again.

[hater]

oh and :lmao Kagala

[Chucho]

oh and :lmao Kagala


Wouldn't calling her "Kagada" be more funny since you're of some kind of Spanish speaking nationality? Doesn't cagada mean "shit" in Spanish?

[hater]

Wouldn't calling her "Kagada" be more funny since you're of some kind of Spanish speaking nationality? Doesn't cagada mean "shit" in Spanish?

Cagala means to shit, or shit it out.

[Chucho]

Cagala means to shit, or shit it out.

Gotcha. Thought the Messicans called it "Cagada". LkrFan, please translate.

[DMC]

huh? shes tied for 5th. The only reason she's listed first is due to the Alphabet :lol

again tied for 5th at 3% is significantly better than her polling at 1% or 2% at the bottom. It's solid :tu

I'm pretty sure we will hear from her again.

Put her at the bottom.

[Pavlov]

:lol the main difference for Tulsi is that four Republicans voted for her this time around.

More non-Democrats voted for her than Democrats :lmao

[hater]

^ #stillwithher

[hater]

Put her at the bottom.

I'll think about it.... Maybe

[Pavlov]

^ #stillwithher:lmao you can't refute even one thing I posted.

:lol ad haternem.

[boutons_deux]

"It is okay to disagree and vote against party leadership in the house on specific issues.

To have your own principled stance on something that matters to your state or district.

I can understand that, and respect negotiations.

On the other hand, this rant, filled with Fox News endorsed talking points, is simply disqualifying.


https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1176853437499215874/ru7zyZe4_bigger.jpg (https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard)Tulsi Gabbard
(https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard)✔@TulsiGabbard
(https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard)Oct 18, 2019 (https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1185289626409406464)

Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton (https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton).
You, the queen of warmongers,
embodiment of corruption, and
personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long,
have finally come out from behind the curtain.
From the day I announced my candidacy,
there has been a ...




https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1163227052675387392/FZlU4QQ-_bigger.jpg (https://twitter.com/AhmedBaba_)



Ahmed Baba@AhmedBaba_
(https://twitter.com/AhmedBaba_)
With this unhinged thread alleging the former 2016 Democratic nominee is launching a conspiracy against her,

Tulsi Gabbard confirms she is not seriously running for the Democratic nomination.

Tulsi just confirmed all of the criticisms directed at her.

This is some right-wing BS

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1185289626409406464 … (https://t.co/n1glf4RY3a)


===================

she has taken every turn to

embrace views that could be summed up as “American lives matter, the lives of anyone else don’t.”

Jacobin covered this in a breakdown of the congresswoman (https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party).

From 2014 onward, Gabbard appeared regularly on Fox News to lambast the Obama administration for avoiding the phrase (“radical Islam.”)

In one interview (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/28/hawaii-rising-dem-star-risks-future-to-take-on-obama-over-islamic-extremism.html), she told the host that “the vast majority of terrorist attacks conducted around the world for over the last decade have been conducted by groups who are fueled by this radical Islamic ideology,”

a statement that may be technically true (https://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2015/257526.htm) due to the violence and instability plaguing Middle Eastern countries,

but is wildly misleading considering that non-Muslims make up the vast, vast majority of terrorist perpetrators in both Europe (https://thinkprogress.org/less-than-2-percent-of-terrorist-attacks-in-the-e-u-are-religiously-motivated-cec7d8ebedf6) and the United States (https://www.wired.com/2013/02/american-muslim-terrorism/).

In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shootings in January 2015,

Gabbard complained (http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/white-house-terror-rhetoric-appropriately-careful-overly-cautious/) on Fox News that by “not using this term ‘Islamic extremism’ and clearly identifying our enemies,”

the administration couldn’t “come up with a very effective strategy to defeat that enemy.”

She told Neil Cavuto (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/02/03/hawaii_democrat_tulsi_gabbard_the_name_of_the_grou p_can_change_but_we_are_fighting_radical_islamic_i deology.html) that “this isn’t about one specific group,” but about “this radical Islamic ideology that is fueling this,” and that it needed to be defeated “militarily and ideologically.”

She characterized (http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/02/16/democratic-rep-gabbard-were-not-recognizing-who-our-enemy) Obama’s refusal to “recognize” the enemy as “mind-boggling” and “troubling.”


Gabbard flirted with joining the Trump administration, (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/why-democratic-rep-tulsi-gabbard-met-donald-trump-n686976) taking an interview,

and she also refused to denounce the appointment of Steve Bannon in the Trump administration.

Breitbart, Bannon, and others quickly praised her.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/18/1893465/-Let-s-get-real-about-Tulsi-Gabbard?detail=emaildkre (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/18/1893465/-Let-s-get-real-about-Tulsi-Gabbard?detail=emaildkre)

[in2deep]

Those are not republican talking points

Lol

[Winehole23]

Jeet Heer pits the kibosh of the "Russian asset" piffle:

https://www.thenation.com/article/clinton-tulsi-gabbard/

[boutons_deux]

Hillary's move on TG could be a warning shot, scaring off any 3rd party Russian assets like Moscow-visiting 3rd party Jill Stein who hurt Hillary in 2016.

If TG runs as 3rd party and ends up with lots "dark money" funds, Hillary's "smear" would have been spot on.

[LkrFan]

Gotcha. Thought the Messicans called it "Cagada". LkrFan, please translate.

Nope, it's cagala. I'll use it in a sentence:

Donald Trump is full of orange cagala :lol

[DMC]

Nope, it's cagala. I'll use it in a sentence:

Donald Trump is full of orange cagala :lol
Cagala means "Gray". Cagada means "shit".

[LkrFan]

Cagala means "Gray". Cagada means "shit".

Don't try and correct me son. You're wrong, I'm rightPERIOD. :lol

[hater]

https://twitter.com/rachelfromohio/status/1186390630823550976?s=21

[DMC]

Don't try and correct me son. You're wrong, I'm rightPERIOD. :lol

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=cagada&s=g&t=w

[Chucho]

Nope, it's cagala. I'll use it in a sentence:

Donald Trump is full of orange cagala :lol

:tu gracias amigo de un hijo del mojado grande jefe

[Winehole23]

Informal command form plus direct object pronoun, like hater said.

[LkrFan]

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=cagada&s=g&t=w

I said what I said :lol

[LkrFan]

:tu gracias amigo de un hijo del mojado grande jefe

No problemo :lol

[Millennial_Messiah]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRm44TJXdWc

what she is saying is correct, especially regarding syria.

[DMC]

I said what I said :lol

That's because you're not a real Messican

[Reck]

Tulsi still talking about Hillary a week later.

Talk about clout chasing. Still won't make the next debate.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tulsi-gabbard-hillary-clinton-democrats-russia

[hater]

tulsi tulsi tulsi!


usa usa usa!

[boutons_deux]

New York Times changes story admitting they misquoted Clinton saying ‘Russians’ were ‘grooming’ Tulsi Gabbard

1186712387707199488

1186712397337243649

[Pavlov]

tulsi tulsi tulsi!


usa usa usa!:lol today's CNN poll

[hater]

^ #stillwithher

[Pavlov]

^ #stillwithher:lmao hater getting shredded in every thread. Tries to deflect.

What's Tulsi's number in this poll, hater?

[Chris]

tusli's good looking imo

excellent point

[Chris]

https://media0.giphy.com/media/CVKHzO236cItG/source.gif

[Pavlov]

Chris is melting down incredibly hard today.

[Winehole23]

The Emerson Poll was 64% landlines. No wonder Joe Biden supporters are so hard to spot in the wild.

https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/july-national-poll-biden-extends-support-while-bernie-bounces-back

[Winehole23]

(You have to go to the tabs in the embedded spreadsheet, right at the end.)

[AaronY]

The Emerson Poll was 64% landlines. No wonder Joe Biden supporters are so hard to spot in the wild.

https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/july-national-poll-biden-extends-support-while-bernie-bounces-back
Im right here every day bro.

[Winehole23]

Im right here every day bro.I meant in meatspace.

[AaronY]

I meant in meatspace.
Actually cyberspace is where you most of you guys hang out https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/political-twitter-is-no-place-for-moderates/

imagine thinking rose twitter represents real life in any way *shudders*