The Official Tulsi Gabbard 2020 Bandwagon Thread

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVvYH6Kkj_s

[Reck]

:lmao hater getting shredded in every thread. Tries to deflect.

What's Tulsi's number in this poll, hater?

Ask him about today's poll. :lol

:lol Klobuchar making it instead of her

[Pavlov]

Ask him about today's poll. :lol

:lol Klobuchar making it instead of herMan, her numbers have been abysmal this week. Twitter bots need to find a way to get landlines and respond to verbal questions.

[hater]

^ #stillwithher :lol

[Pavlov]

^ #stillwithher :lol:lmao hater can't even talk about Tulsi is his own Tulsi thread anymore.

:lol































:lmao

[TheGreatYacht]

Red Flag: CNN Defends Tulsi Gabbard & Criticizes Hillary Clinton

https://youtu.be/XIsw6PcZDJI

[Pavlov]

YouTubes aside, she looks done as far as a Democrat run goes.

[TheGreatYacht]

YouTubes aside, she looks done as far as a Democrat run goes.

Bernie Sanders should pick her as his VP asap tbh.

[Pavlov]

Bernie Sanders should pick her as his VP asap tbh.He also looks done. Pete's more likely to be the VP pick in demand.

[Reck]

Bernie Sanders should pick her as his VP asap tbh.

He cant even help himself and you think he's in a position to pick his VP right now? :lol

[spurraider21]

Red Flag: CNN Defends Tulsi Gabbard & Criticizes Hillary Clinton

https://youtu.be/XIsw6PcZDJI
:lmao always a conspiracy

CNN critical of Tulsi? SEE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR THEY HATE HER

CNN defends Tulsi? SEE ITS A DIVERSION THEY ARE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR THEY HATE HER

[hater]

Bernie Sanders should pick her as his VP asap tbh.

tulsi will be fine regardless. this is just abtest run for 2024 as I called since start

[Spurs Homer]

Tulsi on hannity might as well run as a republican

disgraceful bitch was asked about hunter biden and the bitch says

”he must be held accountable”

for what?

fucking bitch

any respectable person - would have set hannity straight and said

”what crimes are you saying he committed?”

she is a disgrace - too bad i actually liked her before this hrc episode


and will she ever explain how hrc actually started wars when she has never been president?

[DarrinS]

Tulsi on hannity might as well run as a republican

disgraceful bitch was asked about hunter biden and the bitch says

”he must be held accountable”

for what?

fucking bitch

any respectable person - would have set hannity straight and said

”what crimes are you saying he committed?”

she is a disgrace - too bad i actually liked her before this hrc episode


and will she ever explain how hrc actually started wars when she has never been president?



This meltdown

:lmao

[Reck]

Tulsi on hannity might as well run as a republican

disgraceful bitch was asked about hunter biden and the bitch says

”he must be held accountable”

for what?

fucking bitch

any respectable person - would have set hannity straight and said

”what crimes are you saying he committed?”

she is a disgrace - too bad i actually liked her before this hrc episode


and will she ever explain how hrc actually started wars when she has never been president?

She's getting primaried.

And thanks to the fact she cant be seem outside of Fox News these days it will probably end up costing her that seat.

[Spurs Homer]

She's getting primaried.

And thanks to the fact she cant be seem outside of Fox News these days it will probably end up costing her that seat.

she actually recited russian talking points - again-

saying that hrc is responsible for MILLIONS of dead from wars she started?

wut?

[Spurs Homer]

Hannity even whined to tulsi that the dems impeachment investigation was being done in secret and was illegitimate...


the bitch responded with, “yeah- I dont know what is going on and we need transparency”

When did she become a republican? Lol

[DarrinS]

Hannity even whined to tulsi that the dems impeachment investigation was being done in secret and was illegitimate...


the bitch responded with, “yeah- I dont know what is going on and we need transparency”

When did she become a republican? Lol


transparency is a terrible thing. Obviously, she's a Russian asset

[Reck]

transparency is a terrible thing. Obviously, she's a Russian asset

Dont know about Russian but she's definitely a closeted Republican who got exposed.

[Spurs Homer]

transparency is a terrible thing. Obviously, she's a Russian asset

you are an idiot

she knows exactly what is going on - she knows that the house is following the rules that were enacted by the majority republican house in 2015

she knows that dems And repukes get equal time asking questions and equal representation

she chose to act stupid and spew an ignorant rt wing whacko conspiracy talking point

[DarrinS]

Dont know about Russian but she's definitely a closeted Republican who got exposed.

What about her is Republican? Be specific

[AaronY]

Looks like Tulsi's poll numbers have doubled..went from 0 to 0.0

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/466927-warren-overtakes-sanders-in-new-poll

lmao

or to put it in hater's language:rollin :lol :lmao :rollin

[AaronY]

someone photoshop tulsi onto belushi's face here real quick:

vgn0O0yuEls

[AaronY]

0.0 lmfao unreal

[AaronY]

What about her is Republican? Be specific
Does she actually have Democratic policies? like does she support M4all, $15 minimum wage etc? I honestly dont follow her so I don't know.

It would be funny watching all you guys jump ship if she got to the top of the polls all of a sudden and supported all those lmao.

[SnakeBoy]

Does she actually have Democratic policies? like does she support M4all, $15 minimum wage etc? I honestly dont follow her so I don't know.

It would be funny watching all you guys jump ship if she got to the top of the polls all of a sudden and supported all those lmao.

She's actually pretty far left policy wise. Really it's just her anti-war stance that has her in trouble with the party. It's like she actually believed what Dems were saying the Bush administration, silly girl.

[Winehole23]

She's actually pretty far left policy wise. Really it's just her anti-war stance that has her in trouble with the party. It's like she actually believed what Dems were saying the Bush administration, silly girl.What Republicans like about Gabbard is her weirdo nationalism and her strident denunciation of swarthy, non-Christian terrorists. Not sure there's much indication Tulsi is actually a peacenik.

[Spurtacular]

What Republicans like about Gabbard is her weirdo nationalism and her strident denunciation of swarthy, non-Christian terrorists.

How dare she!

Do you even listen to yourself, Blakehole?

[Winehole23]

Woodrow Wilson campaigned on a promise not to go to WWI, then turned around and did just that.

GWB talked about having a humble foreign policy, then invaded two middle eastern countries and drone-bombed half a dozen more we weren't technically at war with.

Setting too much by the self-representations of politicians is often a primrose path.

[Spurtacular]

Woodrow Wilson campaigned on a promise not to go to WWI, then turned around and did just that.

GWB talked about having a humble foreign policy, then invaded two middle eastern countries and drone-bombed half a dozen more we weren't technically at war with.

Setting too much by the self-representations of politicians is often a primrose path.

Yea, we should really just ignore these beatniks talking about peace.

[Winehole23]

Yea, we should really just ignore these beatniks talking about peace.Hey man, I think peace is cool too. I just don't trust Gabbard very much.

[Spurtacular]

I just don't trust Gabbard very much.

I mean how could you; she's a Russian asset, amirite?

[Winehole23]

I mean how could you; she's a Russian asset, amirite?I don't think so, no.

I don't trust Gabbard because she's a politician running for high office. I might feel differently if it was a city council or school board election.

[Spurtacular]

I don't think so, no.

I don't trust Gabbard because she's a politician running for high office. I might feel differently if it was a city council or school board election.

So, your opinion means next to nothing in a certain context cos you don't trust everyone.

[Pavlov]

Of course certain posters here would support the cult member candidate.

[Spurtacular]

Of course certain posters here would support the cult member candidate.

What cult is that?

Too neutered to answer?

[Reck]

She won’t seek re-election. She’s having a great week. :lol

Fox News there she goes baby make room.

[hater]

:tu called it this is a real test run for 2024 :tu

tulsi tulsi tulsi 2024!!!


usa usa usa!!!

[Pavlov]

:tu Hell yeah! She might even break 1% in 2024! :tu

:tu Dancing with the Stars! :tu

[hater]

^ #stillwithher

[Reck]

:tu called it this is a real test run for 2024 :tu

tulsi tulsi tulsi 2024!!!


usa usa usa!!!

How do you run a test in 2019 by dropping out from a seat in congress? She lost her own constituency by being a complete retard and going to Fox every night. :lol

[Pavlov]

^ #stillwithherI can shut you up about Tulsi any time I want.

:lmao hater


:lol



























:lol

[Pavlov]

How do you run a test in 2019 by dropping out from a seat in congress? She lost her own constituency by being a complete retard and going to Fox every night. :lol:lmao Hawaii doesn't want her back.

:lol hater





















:lol

[hater]

How do you run a test in 2019 by dropping out from a seat in congress? She lost her own constituency by being a complete retard and going to Fox every night. :lol

um it would not have been a real test run if ahe had dropped off Dumbo :lol

she dont give a shit about a miserable congress seat since she is eyeing 2024

everything going as I called it. sorry if you cant keep up. good effort tho :lol

[boutons_deux]

I bet she gets a gig with Fox, moves to some nightmarish shithole red state, switches to Repug shitshow, and announces candidacy for something.

[hater]

and I bet you are wrong on all counts bouttocks :lmao

[Pavlov]

um it would not have been a real test run if ahe had dropped off Dumbo :lol

she dont give a shit about a miserable congress seat since she is eyeing 2024

everything going as I called it. sorry if you cant keep up. good effort tho :lolYou called her complete flameout in the polls and the people of her own district rejecting her?

Bravo.:tu

[Winehole23]

What cult is that?

Too neutered to answer?
Read and learn:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/tulsi-gabbard-2020-presidential-campaign.html

[hater]

:tu :tu

tulsi tulsi tulsi!!!

usa usa usa!!!

https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard/status/1187706669683183616?s=21

[hater]

shes going for the jugular of the democratic party :tu

https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard/status/1187706898100867077?s=21

shes going for all the marbles :tu

[Spurs Homer]

shes going for the jugular of the democratic party :tu

https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard/status/1187706898100867077?s=21

shes going for all the marbles :tu


lol

her tweet translated: “russian talking points”

nuff sed

[boutons_deux]

Wall St. reporter: Tulsi mulls 3rd party run at executive's meeting. (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894924/-Wall-St-reporter-Tulsi-now-mulling-3rd-party-run-at-executive-s-meeting)

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894924/-Wall-St-reporter-Tulsi-now-mulling-3rd-party-run-at-executive-s-meeting?detail=emaildkre

she's testing the waters, will get showered $100Ms from Wall st / oligarchy to split the vote and keep Trash as President, more tax cuts, more murderous deregulations.

[Pavlov]

Wall St. reporter: Tulsi mulls 3rd party run at executive's meeting. (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894924/-Wall-St-reporter-Tulsi-now-mulling-3rd-party-run-at-executive-s-meeting)

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894924/-Wall-St-reporter-Tulsi-now-mulling-3rd-party-run-at-executive-s-meeting?detail=emaildkre

she's testing the waters, will get showered $100Ms from Wall st / oligarchy to split the vote and keep Trash as President, more tax cuts, more murderous deregulations.


lol of all outlets, Fox Business with the scoop.

[hater]

lol

her tweet translated: “russian talking points”

nuff sed

another mccarthy :lol

[spurraider21]

oh no, she's gonna take her 0.0% of the vote to a third party!

[spurraider21]

:tu called it this is a real test run for 2024 :tu

tulsi tulsi tulsi 2024!!!


usa usa usa!!!
:lmao what a successful test run... dropping in the polls to 0.0%

[hater]

Tulsi living rent free in Shillarytards heads :lmao

love it

[spurraider21]

Tulsi living rent free
:lmao its literally a tulsi thread

hillary living rent free in hater's head

[hater]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1187758248297938944?s=21

oh but shes polling at 0% then why would her running at 3rd party hurt the demoshits :lmao

pick a lane morons :lol

[hater]

:lmao its literally a tulsi thread

hillary living rent free in hater's head


yup and youre posting in it multiple times

rent free :lol

[hater]

:lmao

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1187733870101303297?s=21

[boutons_deux]

lol of all outlets, Fox Business with the scoop.

?? Fox would love a DINO to run a 3rd party and split the Dem vote.

Unlike Russia-compromised Jill Stein / Green, and Nader / Naderism, Gabbard's got no big hot issue to run on.

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1187758248297938944?s=21

oh but shes polling at 0% then why would her running at 3rd party hurt the demoshits :lmao

pick a lane morons :lolWill she make a third party run just like Hillary said?

Yes or no.

Call it.

[cheguevara]

:lmao

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1187733870101303297?s=21

democrats are stupid this is nothing new


Tulsi as 3rd party could actually hurt Trump as well since many independents who might vote Trump to avoid a Biden or lookalike might vote her

[hater]

democrats are stupid this is nothing new


Tulsi as 3rd party could actually hurt Trump as well since many independents who might vote Trump to avoid a Biden or lookalike might vote her

agreed

snowflake shillarytards are the stupidest pieces of shit in existence so regardless Trump will win 2020 unless couped

that is why they are so desperate to coup him

they know they already lost 2020

[spurraider21]

:lmao

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1187733870101303297?s=21
when i look at that guy's page...

https://i.gyazo.com/06dd4e1ffa4c7f2b0aa99e0d43e62d15.png

[Spurs Homer]

Hrc: “called it!”

[Spurminator]

At this point she seems more likely to siphon off Trump votes than Democrat votes if she runs as a 3rd party candidate.

(Which is why she probably won't.)

[Pavlov]

At this point she seems more likely to siphon off Trump votes than Democrat votes if she runs as a 3rd party candidate.

(Which is why she probably won't.)Well it's probably independents who would be most in play, but she may just be auditioning for Fox News after all.

[hater]

https://twitter.com/mark_gander3/status/1187786575624597504?s=21


aaaaaamen

[hater]

https://twitter.com/metcalfemegan/status/1187773929114357761?s=21

[hater]

https://twitter.com/tulsi20203/status/1187795128662003712?s=21

[koriwhat]

lol

her tweet translated: “russian talking points”

nuff sed

lol

your reply translated : "i'm a big fucking conspiracy retard loser"

nuff sed

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/metcalfemegan/status/1187773929114357761?s=21Will she make a third party run just like Hillary said?

Yes or no.

Call it.

[hater]

I would say no. she wont go third party

but everything is possible, shillarytard

[koriwhat]

they know they already lost 2020

yep :tu

[hater]

I can tell ya why too, shillarytard.

Tulsi wants a fight and no better place to fight than within the democratic party.

whe wants to behead Shitler, your hero. thats why I think she will remain

[DMC]

I can tell ya why too, shillarytard.

Tulsi wants a fight and no better place to fight than within the democratic party.

whe wants to behead Shitler, your hero. thats why I think she will remain

It's amazing how politicians call each other "my friend from..." whatever state in congress but shit on each other during elections. You want to know the worst thing about these people? They'll be sure to rat on each other when the prospect of power presents itself.

[Pavlov]

I can tell ya why too, shillarytard.

Tulsi wants a fight and no better place to fight than within the democratic party.

whe wants to behead Shitler, your hero. thats why I think she will remainSo you're actually making a call here?

[hater]

I answer d your question Shillarytard.

just be happy enough with that and go on your merry snowflake way :lol

[Pavlov]

:lol you literally can't stop talking about Hillary

:lmao hater














:lol

[hater]

#stillwithher ^

[Pavlov]

#stillwithher ^#stillpostingabouther ^

[koriwhat]

#stillwithher ^

he's a faggot so of course he loves him some lgbt bull dyke hillary and he doesn't want you to make fun of that ugly old cunt either.

[Pavlov]

Apparently kori can't stop posting about me either.


:lol kori

[hater]

he's a faggot so of course he loves him some lgbt bull dyke hillary and he doesn't want you to make fun of that ugly old cunt either.

:lmao Trump really did a number on d poor bastard

no wonder he renamed himself pavlov on election night :lmao

[koriwhat]

:lmao Trump really did a number on d poor bastard

no wonder he renamed himself pavlov on election night :lmao

he's a weak pos and that's how weak males, like chump, act.

[Spurtacular]

Read and learn:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/tulsi-gabbard-2020-presidential-campaign.html

Sounds like she has a moral compass. Democrats hate that.

[Winehole23]

Sounds like she has a moral compass. Democrats hate that.New Age AF, tbh.

[koriwhat]

Sounds like she has a moral compass. Democrats hate that.

https://people-equation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/truth-uncovered.jpg

[Reck]

https://people-equation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/truth-uncovered.jpg

Weren't you saying how she can go fuck herself like 2 days ago when she posted some video you didn't like? Now she "speaks the truth?"

:lol Femboy crackhead

[koriwhat]

Weren't you saying how she can go fuck herself like 2 days ago when she posted some video you didn't like? Now she "speaks the truth?"

:lol Femboy crackhead

i won't vote for her because of her crazy affiliation with that krishna sect but i never said she should go fuck herself. you're such a disingenuous tranny.

:lol Tranny faggot

[Pavlov]

:lmao Trump really did a number on d poor bastard

no wonder he renamed himself pavlov on election night :lmao:lol look at the join date.

I really did a number on you to make you lie so much. :lmao

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1190363519109066752?s=19

[TheGreatYacht]

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1190363519109066752?s=19

"Google Dancing Israelis" - Charlie Kirk TRUTH BOMBED

https://youtu.be/ntNSUQeah-c

[dabom6]

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1190363519109066752?s=19

As an engineer. Those buildings didn't come down from airplane fuel fire. :lol

[Chris]

As an engineer. Those buildings didn't come down from airplane fuel fire. :lol

nano thermite

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1190363519109066752?s=19
misleading as fuck headline :lol

and holy shit :lmao :lmao tucker's question: WHY ISNT HILLARY DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS

[FuzzyLumpkins]

transparency is a terrible thing. Obviously, she's a Russian asset

The issue is that the GOP has been in every one of those closed door meetings not that transparency is actually a bad thing.

That is what is funny. They are in the closed door meetings and are privy to all the testimony given. They've chosen to go with this song and dance routine about the process when a) it is based on rules they created and b) they cannot think of a narrative for you to parrot that actually argues the case on merit.

These open hearing are going to be real interesting.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

As an engineer. Those buildings didn't come down from airplane fuel fire. :lol

good thing the NIST model uses all the flammables in the building in their model.

[Chris]

Firefighters and first responders witnessed channels of molten lava like you would see at a foundry. The debris was shipped overseas so it couldn't be inspected.

Nano thermite only comes from one place.

[dabom6]

I agree with Chris.

[hater]

ma niga Tulsi obliteraing them stablishment snakes

[hater]

https://twitter.com/Horton361/status/1190413026312232960

[spurraider21]

Firefighters and first responders witnessed channels of molten lava like you would see at a foundry. The debris was shipped overseas so it couldn't be inspected.

Nano thermite only comes from one place.
:lol

[Chris]

:lol

I don't know what's funny those are all facts

[AaronY]

UPDATE: Clinton added in hypothetical poll. Tulsi doubles once again from 0.0 to 0.00 lol

1190780932149649408

:END UPDATE

[AaronY]

She's literally at 0.0 lmfao.

[Spurtacular]

UPDATE: Clinton added in hypothetical poll. Tulsi doubles once again from 0.0 to 0.00 lol

1190780932149649408

:END UPDATE

Gabbard is hot but ZERO PERCENT.

:lmao Fake Polls

[Spurtacular]

She's literally at 0.0 lmfao.

You're literally an idiot for believing such nonsense. lmfao

[AaronY]

You guys she can keep this momentum up?? I think if she keeps doubling at this rate 0.0000000 is within her reach tbh

[AaronY]

0.0 hehehe oh man rofl

[AaronY]

Democratic Party is terrified of this fucking beast:

https://twitter.com/The_Ryan_King88/status/1185988414283436033
lmao yeh so scary. "We will not be silenced" all 0.0 of us

[ChumpDumper]

deanwormer.gif

[ElNono]

Firefighters and first responders witnessed channels of molten lava like you would see at a foundry. The debris was shipped overseas so it couldn't be inspected.

Nano thermite only comes from one place.

:lmao

Nano thermite conspiratard was easy to debunk. Their reaction releases extremely harmful UV light and apparently none of these first responders were blind since they all saw this molten lava, amiright?

[Reck]

UPDATE: Clinton added in hypothetical poll. Tulsi doubles once again from 0.0 to 0.00 lol

1190780932149649408

:END UPDATE

Scary that Hillary would have that much support this late into this.

[ElNono]

Biden is Hillary. Dems are making a mistake, tbh. I know 4 years of Trump is basically a huge boost to them, but they’re alienating voters.

[Spurminator]

Why hasn't Donald Trump exposed the 9/11 cover-up yet?

[ChumpDumper]

Why hasn't Donald Trump exposed the 9/11 cover-up yet?:lol I mean Gabbard does have a point about the involvement of elements of the Saudi government with radicals but she's never going to get any cooperation just throwing blanket accusations out there.

Qhris went into a whole different area of woo with his rant.

[spurraider21]

:lol I mean Gabbard does have a point about the involvement of elements of the Saudi government with radicals but she's never going to get any cooperation just throwing blanket accusations out there.

Qhris went into a whole different area of woo with his rant.
gabbard: why dont we talk more about saudi involvement in 9/11 and terrorism

chris: exactly! nanothermites and such amirite?

[Spurtacular]

Scary that Hillary would have that much support this late into this.

Why is it scary? Is she corrupt?

[Spurtacular]

Biden is Hillary. Dems are making a mistake, tbh. I know 4 years of Trump is basically a huge boost to them, but they’re alienating voters.

It's a big boost for the country indeed.

[dabom7]

I agree with Chris.

Fuck you nigga. You ain't me.

[Millennial_Messiah]

Scary that Hillary would have that much support this late into this.
not #StillWithHer, tbh?

[Spurtacular]

not #StillWithHer, tbh?

She'll be with whoever the establishment shoves down her throat. That's how she likes it. :lol

[ElNono]

It's a big boost for the country indeed.

No matter how good you think he is, incumbency always has a politically negative cost. Probably the only exception is war times.

[Spurtacular]

No matter how good you think he is, incumbency always has a politically negative cost. Probably the only exception is war times.

How do you figure?

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/Horton361/status/1190413026312232960

She's not for the Incel Chumpettes. They're #StillWithTheirFagHag :lmao

[ElNono]

How do you figure?

Because the freshness and unknown factor is gone. Every president starts off with relatively high approval ratings, but it inevitably dwindles down as they become known quantities (what they promised vs what they delivered, ability to execute an agenda, etc) This isn’t specific to Trump, happens with pretty much all presidents. The exception (such as with dubya), is war times, where exceptional cases of national unity come to the forefront.

Obviously, there’s more factors, but in politics, the more time you spend on power, the less people like you.

[Spurtacular]

Because the freshness and unknown factor is gone. Every president starts off with relatively high approval ratings, but it inevitably dwindles down as they become known quantities (what they promised vs what they delivered, ability to execute an agenda, etc) This isn’t specific to Trump, happens with pretty much all presidents. The exception (such as with dubya), is war times, where exceptional cases of national unity come to the forefront.

Obviously, there’s more factors, but in politics, the more time you spend on power, the less people like you.

That's what the establishment wants you to believe so that these presidents have inbuilt excuses for giving the finger to the American people. Surely approval rating goes down as the result of the finger too. Bush didn't give two shits about serving the public once he got his power renewed. Many would argue same goes for Obama. Trump isn't in their mold.

[Reck]

Because the freshness and unknown factor is gone. Every president starts off with relatively high approval ratings, but it inevitably dwindles down as they become known quantities (what they promised vs what they delivered, ability to execute an agenda, etc) This isn’t specific to Trump, happens with pretty much all presidents. The exception (such as with dubya), is war times, where exceptional cases of national unity come to the forefront.

Obviously, there’s more factors, but in politics, the more time you spend on power, the less people like you.

Such was never the case with Trump though. He's right where he started. Has he ever been above 45%? He has neither increased his base nor has it shrunk really except a big chunk of independents breaking away.

Anyways you look it it, he's gonna need better numbers than 2016.

[Spurtacular]

Such was never the case with Trump though. He's right where he started. Has he ever been above 45%? He has neither increased his base nor has it shrunk really except a big chunk of independents breaking away.

Anyways you look it it, he's gonna need better numbers than 2016.

Tranny coming up with desperate narratives to help her sleep at night.

[Chris]

Such was never the case with Trump though. He's right where he started. Has he ever been above 45%? He has neither increased his base nor has it shrunk really except a big chunk of independents breaking away.

Anyways you look it it, he's gonna need better numbers than 2016.

Trump was at 50% and will win easily in 2020. His base is larger than ever. What are you talking about? :lol

[Chris]

What a terrible take :lol

[boutons_deux]

Because the freshness and unknown factor is gone. Every president starts off with relatively high approval ratings, but it inevitably dwindles down as they become known quantities (what they promised vs what they delivered, ability to execute an agenda, etc) This isn’t specific to Trump, happens with pretty much all presidents. The exception (such as with dubya), is war times, where exceptional cases of national unity come to the forefront.

Obviously, there’s more factors, but in politics, the more time you spend on power, the less people like you.

I read that at 1000 days, Trash's approval is middle of the pack.

But Trash's hilarious anomaly is that he has NEVER had approval above 50%

https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

[Spurtacular]

Trump was at 50% and will win easily in 2020. His base is larger than ever. What are you talking about? :lol

Independents are breaking off. You didn't hear?

[Chris]

Independents are breaking off. You didn't hear?

:http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/O5NyCibf93upy/giphy.gif

[Reck]

Trump was at 50% and will win easily in 2020. His base is larger than ever. What are you talking about? :lol

Trump has never polled at 50% with a reputtable pollster in his life. And how has he grown his base? :lol Qchris believing 4chan counts for anything

[Chris]

Qualifiers and hyperbole. Boring.

[ElNono]

That's what the establishment wants you to believe so that these presidents have inbuilt excuses for giving the finger to the American people. Surely approval rating goes down as the result of the finger too. Bush didn't give two shits about serving the public once he got his power renewed. Many would argue same goes for Obama. Trump isn't in their mold.

There’s no establishment nothing, this is basic human interaction. That’s why I said it’s not restricted to Trump. There’s simply wear and tear as you get to know a person better. You like some things, you dislike others, you learn the virtues and the flaws, the person becomes a known quantity.

That’s the price of incumbency. When you don’t know a person, you can always idealize it to be close to your preferences, once you get to know them, what sets it apart from your idealization is the differences and, generally, flaws. Similar psychological situations happen in other situations like marriages.

That’s why politicos are told to spend the bulk of their political capital early right after elections, when support is normally stronger and most of them end up as lame ducks towards the end of their terms.

[ElNono]

Such was never the case with Trump though. He's right where he started. Has he ever been above 45%? He has neither increased his base nor has it shrunk really except a big chunk of independents breaking away.

Anyways you look it it, he's gonna need better numbers than 2016.

Despite being historically among the most disliked presidents, his chances are always relative to the competition. Biden, for example, is not an unknown, he’s a known quantity and not of the good kind...

[Spurtacular]

There’s no establishment nothing

:lmao The naivety

[Spurtacular]

There’s no establishment nothing, this is basic human interaction. That’s why I said it’s not restricted to Trump. There’s simply wear and tear as you get to know a person better. You like some things, you dislike others, you learn the virtues and the flaws, the person becomes a known quantity.

That’s the price of incumbency. When you don’t know a person, you can always idealize it to be close to your preferences, once you get to know them, what sets it apart from your idealization is the differences and, generally, flaws. Similar psychological situations happen in other situations like marriages.

That’s why politicos are told to spend the bulk of their political capital early right after elections, when support is normally stronger and most of them end up as lame ducks towards the end of their terms.

You're just completely overlooking the fact that the people are the ones without the leverage once a politician has been elected to a final term. This is when politicians show their true colors the most (IE Obama telling Putin he'll cooperate with him after re-election); and they are almost always not good colors. My belief is that Trump is of a different mold. He gets off on results. We'll see though.

[TheGreatYacht]

As Gabbard Introduces Resolution For Actual Syria Withdrawal, US Troops Don't Know Who To Shoot At

https://youtu.be/BiaJJezycHQ

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I read that at 1000 days, Trash's approval is middle of the pack.

But Trash's hilarious anomaly is that he has NEVER had approval above 50%

https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

I've shown you the comparison to other presidents already. Why do you keep repeating this shit?

[hater]

Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi!

USA! USA! USA!

[spurraider21]

Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi!

USA! USA! USA!
:lol she's got one week left to qualify for the november debate

[hater]

Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi!

USA! USA! USA!

[hater]

:lol she's got one week left to qualify for the november debate

shes just jogging for the real race in 2024 ma nig

called it since pqge 1 :tu

[hater]

Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi!

USA! USA! USA! USA!

[hater]

:lmao tha bitch from the view :lol obliterated :lol

https://twitter.com/lovewave_sw/status/1192241542968283136?s=21

[Reck]

Tulsi riding Hillary's coattails 2 weeks after she made comments without even using her name. :lol Hater

[hater]

Tulsi riding Hillary's coattails 2 weeks after she made comments without even using her name. :lol Hater

yup thanks Killary :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao tha bitch from the view :lol obliterated :lol

https://twitter.com/lovewave_sw/status/1192241542968283136?s=21She's definitely a Russian asset if you don't get all snowflakey about the term. Also seen as a Republican asset by the Republicans.

[Spurtacular]

She's definitely a Russian asset if you don't get all snowflakey about the term. Also seen as a Republican asset by the Republicans.

Elaborate if you're not too neutered.

[spurraider21]

shes just jogging for the real race in 2024 ma nig

called it since pqge 1 :tu
2024? she's gonna run as a republican challenger to democrat incumbent?

[hater]

2024? she's gonna run as a republican challenger to democrat incumbent?

a dem is winning 2020? who and how?

[hater]

Elaborate if you're not too neutered.

the poor bastard wont elaborate. or just regurgitate a disproven media talking point

[ChumpDumper]

the poor bastard wont elaborate. or just regurgitate a disproven media talking pointShe's an asset to both since she can serve as a means to at least some of their ends. It's pretty simple, but I can't expect you to understand anything so simple. I don't think she is an agent for either; just a useful idiot like so many others.

[hater]

She's an asset to both since she can serve as a means to at least some of their ends. It's pretty simple, but I can't expect you to understand anything so simple. I don't think she is an agent for either; just a useful idiot like so many others.

called it

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi Takes On The View & Hillary

https://youtu.be/OBArkIbMybU

[ChumpDumper]

called it
You called your not being able to understand the simple concept?

Congratulations.

[CosmicCowboy]

Wow Chump. Being against American sponsored regime change is bad now?

[ChumpDumper]

Wow, CC. Her political stances are not terribly principled and easily changed depending on, for instance, what her spiritual guru says.

[CosmicCowboy]

mlz3-OzcExI

[spurraider21]

mlz3-OzcExI
ok. now do "he died like a dog"

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not for the toppling of governments with absolutely no plan to do anything afterwards. Unfortunately that's what we've been doing since 2001.

[CosmicCowboy]

I'm not for the toppling of governments with absolutely no plan to do anything afterwards. Unfortunately that's what we've been doing since 2001.

Damn. You miraculously agree with me and Tulsi Gabbard on something!

[CosmicCowboy]

Fyi, that's about the only thing I agree with on her platform.

[ChumpDumper]

Damn. You miraculously agree with me and Tulsi Gabbard on something!That's not rocket science. I do not share her overriding Islamophobia and embrace of dictators. You might.

[Spurtacular]

She's an asset to both since she can serve as a means to at least some of their ends. It's pretty simple, but I can't expect you to understand anything so simple. I don't think she is an agent for either; just a useful idiot like so many others.


called it

:lol Safe Space Chump pretending we didn't understand the meaning as he takes a pass on actually explaining how she could be an asset for the Russians.

[CosmicCowboy]

That's not rocket science. I do not share her overriding Islamophobia and embrace of dictators. You might.

Typical american liberal hubris. Iraq and Libya were better with dictators than they are now. Some cultures just aren't ready for american style democracy. Hell, I'm beginning to think we might not be either.

[Winehole23]

Typical american liberal hubris. Iraq and Libya were better with dictators than they are now. Some cultures just aren't ready for american style democracy. Hell, I'm beginning to think we might not be either.all hail King Trump!

[ducks]

a dem is winning 2020? who and how?

Now likely

[ChumpDumper]

Typical american liberal hubris. Iraq and Libya were better with dictators than they are now. Some cultures just aren't ready for american style democracy. Hell, I'm beginning to think we might not be either.
Typical bootlicker. You aren't ready for American style democracy.

[hater]

:lol Safe Space Chump pretending we didn't understand the meaning as he takes a pass on actually explaining how she could be an asset for the Russians.

:lol

yup called it

[ChumpDumper]

:lol

yup called it
:lol called your not understanding simple sentences

:lol called it

[hater]

She's definitely a Russian asset if you don't get all snowflakey about the term. Also seen as a Republican asset by the Republicans.


Elaborate if you're not too neutered.


the poor bastard wont elaborate. or just regurgitate a disproven media talking point


She's an asset to both since she can serve as a means to at least some of their ends. It's pretty simple, but I can't expect you to understand anything so simple. I don't think she is an agent for either; just a useful idiot like so many others.


called it

:lmao :lmao

not elaborating how she is a russian asset and how she serves as means to what ends to “them”

:lmao called it

lol chump :lol

[ChumpDumper]

hater, does her stance on Syria line up with the goals of Putin in the area?

Yes or no.

[CosmicCowboy]

hater, does her stance on Syria line up with the goals of Putin in the area?

Yes or no.

Why would US and Russian goals always have to be opposite? Is a stable dictatorship that admittedly is pretty fucking cruel better than anarchy of religious zealots like we now have in Libya?

[Winehole23]

Why would US and Russian goals always have to be opposite? Is a stable dictatorship that admittedly is pretty fucking cruel better than anarchy of religious zealots like we now have in Libya?It was better for Libyans, no doubt about it. Ditto Iraq.

[CosmicCowboy]

hater, does her stance on Syria line up with the goals of Putin in the area?

Yes or no.

Why would US and Russian goals always have to be opposite? Is a stable dictatorship that admittedly is pretty fucking cruel better than anarchy of religious zealots like we now have in Libya?

[CosmicCowboy]

It was better for Libyans, no doubt about it. Ditto Iraq.

I would disagree about Libya. You might want to research that. Libya under gadaffi had extensive social services, free college education, etc. Now it's just a fucked up mess.

[CosmicCowboy]

And Iraq under Hussein was at least a foil to Iran. Now that they are unopposed they are gradually increasing their influence across the region.

[ChumpDumper]

And Iraq under Hussein was at least a foil to Iran. Now that they are unopposed they are gradually increasing their influence across the region.If only we had a ruthless secular dictator to support in Iran....

[CosmicCowboy]

If only we had a ruthless secular dictator to support in Iran....

You have a magic wand to fix that?

[ChumpDumper]

You have a magic wand to fix that?So somehow supporting the ruthless dictator didn't work?

Wow!

That really shits on your little theory, doesn't it?

[Spurtacular]

hater, does her stance on Syria line up with the goals of Putin in the area?

Yes or no.

So anti-war mongering is an asset for Russia? Then BFD on who is an asset for Russia.

:lmao Blake Zero

[ChumpDumper]

So anti-war mongering is an asset for Russia? Then BFD on who is an asset for Russia.

:lmao Blake ZeroYou didn't answer the question.

Does her stance on Syria line up with the goals of Putin in the area?

Yes or no.

[Winehole23]

I would disagree about Libya. You might want to research that. Libya under gadaffi had extensive social services, free college education, etc. Now it's just a fucked up mess.
Read my post again, we agree on this. Things were better before the USA attacked Iraq or Libya.

[CosmicCowboy]

So somehow supporting the ruthless dictator didn't work?

Wow!

That really shits on your little theory, doesn't it?

Wow. You think the mullahs are better than the Shah?

[ChumpDumper]

Wow. You think the mullahs are better than the Shah?Wow. It doesn't matter what you think. The people of Iran overthrew the Shah. Do you know who was there before the Shah 2.0?

[TheGreatYacht]

I would disagree about Libya. You might want to research that. Libya under gadaffi had extensive social services, free college education, etc. Now it's just a fucked up mess.

You are very right, Gaddafi was a great man, when a leader fights for his land and its resources the Americans and europe call him dictator and do all they can to get him dead.

[TheGreatYacht]

Gaddafi gold-for-oil, dollar-doom plans behind Libya 'mission'

https://youtu.be/GuqZfaj34nc




Basically, Gaddafi was about to make GOLD the financial policy in his country, his plan was to unite africa by using a solid currency which would have devastated the united states economic system and bring the current global economic system to an end. United States did NOT want this to happen because it would make an african country the richest most powerful nation in the world. Gaddafi if he would have succeeded would have made the african region a crowning jewel of the world and would have distributed prosperity to the have nots. THE worst things to EVER happen in the 21st century was the Western sponsored removal of Muammar Gaddafi.

The United States of America, a nation of thieves and murderers. The United States and Israel are the real axis of evil.

[Reck]

I forgot to add RT to TGY repertoire. :lol

[Spurtacular]

I forgot to add RT to TGY repertoire. :lol

Yea, that was a glaring omission. Thanks for updating your list, tranny.

[Spurtacular]

Gaddafi gold-for-oil, dollar-doom plans behind Libya 'mission'

https://youtu.be/GuqZfaj34nc

Basically, Gaddafi was about to make GOLD the financial policy in his country, his plan was to unite africa by using a solid currency which would have devastated the united states economic system and bring the current global economic system to an end. United States did NOT want this to happen because it would make an african country the richest most powerful nation in the world. Gaddafi if he would have succeeded would have made the african region a crowning jewel of the world and would have distributed prosperity to the have nots. THE worst things to EVER happen in the 21st century was the Western sponsored removal of Muammar Gaddafi.

The United States of America, a nation of thieves and murderers. The United States and Israel are the real axis of evil.

The elites hate the gold standard.

[Spurtacular]

Wow. It doesn't matter what you think. The people of Iran overthrew the Shah. Do you know who was there before the Shah 2.0?

Pop quiz. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

Pop quiz. :lol:lol you already failed

[hater]

You didn't answer the question.

Does her stance on Syria line up with the goals of Putin in the area?

Yes or no.

called it. regurgitating a debunked media talking point :lmao

Tulsi is against US warmongering EVERYWHERE

for example in Korean peninsula. does that make her a NK asset?

Yemen. does that make her a yemeni asset?

:lol

chump regurgitating a neocon Bush Jr talking point “you are either with us or against us”

:lmao neocon chimp

[ChumpDumper]

called it. regurgitating a debunked media talking point :lmao

Tulsi is against US warmongering EVERYWHERE

for example in Korean peninsula. does that make her a NK asset?

Yemen. does that make her a yemeni asset?

:lol

chump regurgitating a neocon Bush Jr talking point “you are either with us or against us”

:lmao neocon chimphater folds

Called it :lol

[hater]

hater folds

Called it :lol

Tulsi is also against intervention in USA does that also make her an american asset?

[ChumpDumper]

Tulsi is also against intervention in USA does that also make her an american asset?When has the military invasion of the USA by the USA been an issue?

:lmao hater just making shit up now

Called it:tu

[Spurtacular]

called it. regurgitating a debunked media talking point :lmao

Tulsi is against US warmongering EVERYWHERE

for example in Korean peninsula. does that make her a NK asset?

Yemen. does that make her a yemeni asset?

:lol

chump regurgitating a neocon Bush Jr talking point “you are either with us or against us”

:lmao neocon chimp

:lmao Truth-Bombed Neocon Chump

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/62/b5/c9/62b5c92edfeaf59c75dedacbf4f44d88.gif

[Spurtacular]

hater

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77452&p=1954156&viewfull=1#post1954156

Q: Who do you think should be president?


Whoever appoints the fewest neocons to their cabinet.

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

You can tell derp is super angry doing research decades back to find out nothing has actually changed in that time.:lol

[Reck]

Looks like she'll make it to the november debate. That way she can spend her alloted 2 minutes talking how she's gonna defeat Hillary in the primary on her way to become ze president

[ChumpDumper]

Looks like she'll make it to the november debate. That way she can spend her alloted 2 minutes talking how she's gonna defeat Hillary in the primary on her way to become ze president"As a veteran" drinking game.

[Isitjustme?]

1193986420039454721

[ChumpDumper]

1193986420039454721A Republican asset.

[Reck]

HILLARY MUST APOLOGIZE NAO!

[TheGreatYacht]

Special Guest Tulsi Gabbard

https://youtu.be/GjPGvy8LS68




Stay tuned. Live chat very shortly...

[Winehole23]

HILLARY MUST APOLOGIZE NAO!yeah, that was grandiose. even ventured to dictate the apology letter for HRC.

[Spurtacular]

HILLARY MUST APOLOGIZE NAO!

Are you saying she shouldn't apologize, tranny?

[Reck]

Are you saying she shouldn't apologize, tranny?

For what? The fact Tulsi is still hurt about this a month after the fact is telling. Hillary is in her head just like I live rent free in yours.

Neither of us asked for that either. :lol derp

[Spurtacular]

For what? The fact Tulsi is still hurt about this a month after the fact is telling. Hillary is in her head...

So, you're okay with Hillary's wild accusation that an active service woman, vet, and congresswoman is a traitor to her country, huh?

[Spurtacular]

For what? The fact Tulsi is still hurt about this a month after the fact is telling. Hillary is in her head just like I live rent free in yours.

Neither of us asked for that either. :lol derp

:lmao This is the first time you've replied to me in like 20 posts cos you're a safe space poster. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

So, you're okay with Hillary's wild accusation that an active service woman, vet, and congresswoman is a traitor to her country, huh?Wait, where did Hillary call her a traitor?

Link?

[Reck]

So, you're okay with Hillary's wild accusation that an active service woman, vet, and congresswoman is a traitor to her country, huh?

Why wouldn't I be ok? This doesn't affect me in any way.

And just because you served doesn't mean you're above reproached. They're often the most corrupt, I find.

You of all retards should know this as you even made a thread about McCain. You're the same piece of shit that laughed and mocked his dying.

Check yourself, derp.

[spurraider21]

You of all retards should know this as you even made a thread about McCain. You're the same piece of shit that laughed and mocked his dying.

Check yourself, derp.
truth nuke

[Spurtacular]

Wait, where did Hillary call her a traitor?

Link?

You think being groomed by the Russians is not being a traitor? Aren't you trying to impeach a sitting president for that type of relationship?

:lmao Dumb Ass Chump

[Spurtacular]

You think being groomed by the Russians is not being a traitor? Aren't you trying to impeach a sitting president for that type of relationship?

:lmao Dumb Ass Chump

Real Truth Nuke.

:lmao spurraider21

[Spurtacular]

Why wouldn't I be ok? This doesn't affect me in any way.


Yea, I forget; trannies don't have filters. It's okay for Hillary to have wildly inappropriate rhetoric in your world.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

And just because you served doesn't mean you're above reproached. They're often the most corrupt, I find.

Okay, tell us how Tulsi meets such corruption within the scope of Hillary's accusations.

[spurraider21]

Real Truth Nuke.

:lmao spurraider21 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=31905)
hyping up your own posts :lmao... might as well go with your typical parade of alts as well

[Spurtacular]

hyping up your own posts :lmao... might as well go with your typical parade of alts as well

Highlighting, not hyping. Chump just got destroyed.

:lmao :cry But that doesn't fit my chumpette preset
:lmao Lite

[spurraider21]

Highlighting, not hyping. Chump just got destroyed.

:lmao :cry But that doesn't fit my chumpette preset
:lmao Lite
:cry god damn
:cry oh snap
:cry shot through the heart

[Spurtacular]

:cry god damn
:cry oh snap
:cry shot through the heart

Funny, but your buddy still got blown up. :tu

[Winehole23]

You think being groomed by the Russians is not being a traitor? Aren't you trying to impeach a sitting president for that type of relationship?

:lmao Dumb Ass ChumpI thought HRC said Gabbard was being groomed as a Republican asset, is that a mistaken impression?

[Winehole23]

Or do you believe it because it was reported by the NYT, CNN and Politico?

[ChumpDumper]

You think being groomed by the Russians is not being a traitor? Aren't you trying to impeach a sitting president for that type of relationship?

:lmao Dumb Ass ChumpSo you lied.

lol derp

[ChumpDumper]

hyping up your own posts :lmao... might as well go with your typical parade of alts as well:lol

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi Demands Info On Saudi Involvement In 911 Attacks

https://youtu.be/O_0_CQ7umic

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi: Why I’m Running Against Bernie

https://youtu.be/FZ8AuEiiAXM

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi’s Lawyer Demands Hillary Retract Defamation & Apologize

https://youtu.be/mGd-O-K3IYc

[hater]

tulsi qualifies for November debates and is 9000 single donors away from qualifying for December

cue in the salty retards :lmao :lmao :lmao

called it :tu

TULSI TULSI TULSI!!!

USA USA USA!!!!!

[hater]

:lol she's got one week left to qualify for the november debate

:lmao and she did :lmao ^

[hater]

https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard/status/1194951109309132800?s=21

:lmao tulsi going balls deep

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wow. It doesn't matter what you think. The people of Iran overthrew the Shah. Do you know who was there before the Shah 2.0?

A functioning democracy?

[hater]

https://twitter.com/nomorewars2/status/1194960266867273730?s=21

[TheGreatYacht]

Tulsi Comments On Rude Reception On “The View”

https://youtu.be/9cV1YlSsF1g

[Spurtacular]

So you lied.

lol derp

How do you figure, Psychopav Chump?

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/nomorewars2/status/1194960266867273730?s=21

No excuse for Americans to give this witch credence in today's social media world.

[ChumpDumper]

How do you figure, Psychopav Chump?Hillary didn't call her a traitor.

If she did, you would've quoted it.

You lied and there's nothing you can do about it.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

Hillary didn't call her a traitor.

If she did, you would've quoted it.

You lied and there's nothing you can do about it.

lol derp

"Groomed" speaks to a working relationship with 'the bad guys'. That's what your hero said.

lol dump

[ChumpDumper]

"Groomed" speaks to a working relationship with 'the bad guys'. That's what your hero said.

lol dumpI didn't ask for your imagined inference.

Where did she call her a traitor, derp?

Show me the quote.

If you don't have a quote, just say so.

[Spurtacular]

I didn't ask for your imagined inference.

Where did she call her a traitor, derp?

Show me the quote.

If you don't have a quote, just say so.

:lol "imagined"
:lol "inference"

No, groomed speaks directly to a working relationship.

:lmao Pyschopav Chump doesn't want to take ownership of his psychopath hero.

[ChumpDumper]

:lol "imagined"
:lol "inference"

No, groomed speaks directly to a working relationship.

:lmao Pyschopav Chump doesn't want to take ownership of his psychopath hero.
Derp folds.

Hillary did not call her a traitor. You proved it. :tu

[Spurtacular]

Derp folds.

Hillary did not call her a traitor. You proved it. :tu

Working against America's interests for the objectives of its enemies makes one a traitor?

Yes or no.

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard/status/1194951109309132800?s=21

:lmao tulsi going balls deep

Going balls deep on someone that is not even running? Called it!