Russia Hoax completely unraveled. Deep State drops criminal case vs Michael Flynn

[hater]

called it :tu

https://twitter.com/ap/status/1258463906047164421?s=21

[baseline bum]

Wow Barr dropped the case, shocker.

[DMX7]

Wow Barr dropped the case, shocker.

Barr is deep state. They're all deep state. Everyone is deep state.

[ChumpDumper]

Wow Barr dropped the case, shocker.:lol what was the point of dragging it out this long?

[spurraider21]

congrats to TSA and Chris tbh

Barr the hatchet man did the hatchet job. would have preferred to see the Court's ruling on the motions tbh

[Reck]

congrats to TSA and Chris tbh

Barr the hatchet man did the hatchet job. would have preferred to see the Court's ruling on the motions tbh

Can he not be charged again under a different administration? He still pleaded guilty.

[boutons_deux]

:lol what was the point of dragging it out this long?

punishing a criminal? a traitor compromised by Russia? make an example?

[spurraider21]

Can he not be charged again under a different administration? He still pleaded guilty.
theoretically. i dont think anybody would go forward with it.

i dont think double jeopardy would be a concern because trial didnt start, but i just dont think its practical

this also explains why the prosecutor withdrew from the case. protest

[spurraider21]

:lol what was the point of dragging it out this long?
barr hand picked an attorney to review the case, who gave the recommendation to drop charges.

have to create degrees of separation so its not just barr unilaterally making this move

[hater]

Barr is deep state. They're all deep state. Everyone is deep state.

ma nig :tu

[TSA]

theoretically. i dont think anybody would go forward with it.

i dont think double jeopardy would be a concern because trial didnt start, but i just dont think its practical

this also explains why the prosecutor withdrew from the case. protest

Bullshit he withdrew in protest. He’s withdrawn from his other cases as well. He was purposely withholding evidence beneficial to Flynn. Van Grack is done as a DOJ lawyer.

[hater]

when you have flaccid clowns like Strzok in your team, you are bound to lose

[TSA]

congrats to TSA and Chris tbh

Barr the hatchet man did the hatchet job. would have preferred to see the Court's ruling on the motions tbh

It’s truly amazing how you can just ignore what the prosecution tried to pull off and try to make this out as a Barr hatchet job. Lost a lot of respect (not that it matters) for you after seeing you comment like this.

[hater]

It’s truly amazing how you can just ignore what the prosecution tried to pull off and try to make this out as a Barr hatchet job. Lost a lot of respect (not that it matters) for you after seeing you comment like this.

sadly cheerleaders are everywhere

thats why we are where we are

[ChumpDumper]

Ohr shit! QAnon Pizzagate guy lost respect for 21!

[spurraider21]

It’s truly amazing how you can just ignore what the prosecution tried to pull off and try to make this out as a Barr hatchet job. Lost a lot of respect (not that it matters) for you after seeing you comment like this.
thats fine

nothing the FBI did forced Flynn to knowingly lie to them

[ChumpDumper]

thats fine

nothing the FBI did forced Flynn to knowingly lie to themThey also didn't force him to like to Sean Spicer, Reince Priebus and the fucking Vice-President of the United States.

:lol going to bat for this guy. I'm glad this lying weirdo is out of service to the country and will never be back.

[spurraider21]

They also didn't force him to like to Sean Spicer, Reince Priebus and the fucking Vice-President of the United States.

:lol going to bat for this guy. I'm glad this lying weirdo is out of service to the country and will never be back.
you dont think trump is going to find a job for him in his administration? i'd put money on it

[hater]

They also didn't force him to like to Sean Spicer, Reince Priebus and the fucking Vice-President of the United States.

:lol going to bat for this guy. I'm glad this lying weirdo is out of service to the country and will never be back.

:lmao yeah

today was definitely a win for your team :lmao :lol :lol

[ChumpDumper]

you dont think trump is going to find a job for him in his administration? i'd put money on itWould be tough because of the lies to Pence. Easier to see his getting a jerb at Fox or OAN and releasing ghostwritten books a la Ollie North

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao yeah

today was definitely a win for your team :lmao :lol :lolThe win for the US was February 13, 2017.:tu

[hater]

The win for the US was February 13, 2017.:tu

that win was abolished today :lmao

[Reck]

They also didn't force him to like to Sean Spicer, Reince Priebus and the fucking Vice-President of the United States.

:lol going to bat for this guy. I'm glad this lying weirdo is out of service to the country and will never be back.

What you talking about, willis? Trump already asked Flynn to head the FBI as director. MAGA!

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao yeah

today was definitely a win for your team :lmao :lol :lol

Hater - this guy was put under oath...

what happened to his memory - when they asked him under oath - about the "deep state?"

(TSA was too chicken-shit to answer the question)


https://www.foxnews.com/media/john-ratcliffe-doesnt-know-deep-state-meaning

[Reck]

that win was abolished today :lmao

Is it a win when you have to input a cheat code in for the W?

[ChumpDumper]

that win was abolished today :lmaoNope. The only way that W could be "abolished" is if he's reinstated as National Security Adviser. That's unlikely since he lied to Pence too.

[DMX7]

ma nig :tu

You're deep state. Oh, and Flynn already pleaded guilty TWICE. :lol

[Nathan89]

Leftist ideology is corrupting every institution in this country.

[ChumpDumper]

Leftist ideology is corrupting every institution in this country.I prefer the US National Security Adviser not lie to the Vice President about foreign contacts. That's my ideology.

What's your ideology when it comes to the US National Security Adviser's lying to the Vice President about foreign contacts?

[Spurminator]

Leftist ideology is corrupting every institution in this country.

Former Bernie Bro prefers the ideology of "As long as you're going to break the law, make sure you have powerful friends."

[Reck]

Leftist ideology is corrupting every institution in this country.

How were you ever a Bernie Sanders supporter again? Run it by once more.

[Spurtacular]

:lol what was the point of dragging it out this long?

:lmao 2000 pages of TDS.
:lmao A record.

[Chris]

congrats to TSA and Chris tbh

Barr the hatchet man did the hatchet job. would have preferred to see the Court's ruling on the motions tbh

That's my shit.

Get your own shit.

[DMC]

Barr is deep state. They're all deep state. Everyone is deep state.

Bend over, I'll show you fuckin' deep state.

[DMC]

Leftist ideology is corrupting every institution in this country.

The ideology is innocent enough. It's the execution that's the problem. The left can't stop stepping on their own dicks long enough to make any headway. They look like incompetent fucksticks.

[pgardn]

sadly cheerleaders are everywhere

thats why we are where we are

The Russian hoax: AKA, Russia did not interfere in our elections.
You still believe that because you keep using it?

[DarrinS]

The Russian hoax: AKA, Russia did not interfere in our elections.
You still believe that because you keep using it?

Nope. The hoax was so-called collusion

[boutons_deux]

Remember that Pootin toadie Flynn was on the phone 5 TIMES to American adversary Russia the day after the election.

Magnitsky Sanctions Act STILL in force

Caving on Flynn will embolden Trash as did impeachment.

Pootin continues to attack Russia, with collusion by traitorous Trash, Moscow Mitch, Repugs

[ElNono]

Can he not be charged again under a different administration? He still pleaded guilty.

DOJ dismissed with prejudice, so he can't be charged again for this... Barr doing a fine job, tbh

[spurraider21]

DOJ dismissed with prejudice, so he can't be charged again for this... Barr doing a fine job, tbh
good catch

[Spurtacular]

I prefer the US National Security Adviser not lie to the Vice President about foreign contacts. That's my ideology.

What's your ideology when it comes to the US National Security Adviser's lying to the Vice President about foreign contacts?

Tell us about it.

[hater]

You're deep state. Oh, and Flynn already pleaded guilty TWICE. :lol

and hes going home to fuck his wife raw :tu

Flynn

[hater]

:lmao the pussyhat tears in here :lol

[hater]

Nope. The hoax was so-called collusion

ma niga :tu

[hater]

:lmao.

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1258526724242849792?s=20

[ChumpDumper]

Tell us about it.I already did.

What part do yo not understand?

[pgardn]

Nope. The hoax was so-called collusion

Nope, thats not at all what I got out of Mueller, he passed on that.
And before that I told DJohn regularly by what I used as a definition for collusion that would be off the board doubtful.
Way to dangerous for either party and Russia could be much more effective just creating chaos and division.
Just so happens Trump uses chaos and division to lead the country but no way he could get together with the Russians on the campaign they put out.
It was much less expensive and much more in your face to our intelligence services than anything Trump could ever ask for.

And this is for Hater.
So I will ask you.
Do you believe Russia, directed by Putin and others, interfered in our elections?

[Spurtacular]

I already did.

What part do yo not understand?

You made a vague claim and now refuse to detail it. Par.

[ChumpDumper]

You made a vague claim and now refuse to detail it. Par.No, I made very specific claims about Flynn and what he did.

Several times.

What part do you not understand?

[Spurtacular]

No, I made very specific claims about Flynn and what he did.

Several times.

What part do you not understand?

In your 2000 page cry thread?

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

In your 2000 page cry thread?

:lmaoWhat part do you not understand?

[Spurtacular]

What part do you not understand?

Maybe the part where you didn't answer this question either.

You need to get your shit together.

[ChumpDumper]

Maybe the part where you didn't answer this question either.

You need to get your shit together.:lol What do you need to know, derp?

You're flailing around demanding....what?

[Spurs Homer]

DOJ dismissed with prejudice, so he can't be charged again for this... Barr doing a fine job, tbh


not exactly

talking head attorney on tv just said that only the false statements cannot be retried

but his other charges he admitted - other crimes he admitted to committing

not registering as a foreign agent
and
I forget what else-

but the statute does not run out til march 2022

and he already pled guilty to these charges so a prosecutor in a post barr DOJ would have a easier case

[pgardn]

Hater and Darrin:

Do you believe the Russians directed by their intelligence and Putin, interfered in our elections?

[ChumpDumper]

Hater and Darrin:

Do you believe the Russians directed by their intelligence and Putin, interfered in our elections?Dad joke about Facebook incoming.

[hater]

until we see evidence doesnt matter what we think tbqh

and no I dont think a “probable” by our intelligence agencies constitutes as proof

last time they told us something was “probable” we went in and killed a million Iraqis on a lie

[TSA]

Hater and Darrin:

Do you believe the Russians directed by their intelligence and Putin, interfered in our elections?

Sure.

But what’s that have to do with the Clinton campaign paying for fabricated “evidence” that was passed to the FBI who knew it was bullshit and then lied to the FISA court and used that same “evidence” to fraudulently obtain a FISA warrant and spy on one of Trump’s campaign members?

[DarrinS]

Hater and Darrin:

Do you believe the Russians directed by their intelligence and Putin, interfered in our elections?

This isn't collusion

[pgardn]

Sure.

But what’s that have to do with the Clinton campaign paying for fabricated “evidence” that was passed to the FBI who knew it was bullshit and then lied to the FISA court and used that same “evidence” to fraudulently obtain a FISA warrant and spy on one of Trump’s campaign members?

Nothing.
Just need to know the tin foil hatters.
Be on your way, get along now.

[pgardn]

This isn't collusion

You are correct I already posted that just like I posted this to Djohn BEFORE Mueller.

So what’s your answer to my question?
Hater does not believe due to deep state paranoia.

[pgardn]

until we see evidence doesnt matter what we think tbqh

and no I dont think a “probable” by our intelligence agencies constitutes as proof

last time they told us something was “probable” we went in and killed a million Iraqis on a lie

We have seen the evidence.
Both parties believe it to be true besides a few nutcases.
The nutcase who is our president vacillates on this. Last I saw he says Yes.
Other people on the red team downplay it as Russia, Russia, zrussia

We got an election coming up. Just needed to know if you still like being tinfoil hat, gadfly guy.
Stay strong. You are entertainment.

[Th'Pusher]

The ideology is innocent enough. It's the execution that's the problem. The left can't stop stepping on their own dicks long enough to make any headway. They look like incompetent fucksticks.

Yeah, it suck. Blacks can’t vote. Woman can’t vote. Gays can’t marry. Abortion is illegal. Progressives haven’t accomplished shit.

[hater]

Tinfoil is believing the “evidence” presented by our “intelligence” as proof that Russia interfered.

please post the “insurmountable evidence” of this

there simply isnt. and some officials parroting there is is equivalent to Colin Powell dangling a test tube in front of caneras and saying Iraq has WMDs

Ill glady review the evidence you claim to have seen. please by all means post it here

[pgardn]

Tinfoil is believing the “evidence” presented by our “intelligence” as proof that Russia interfered.

please post the “insurmountable evidence” of this

there simply isnt. and some officials parroting there is is equivalent to Colin Powell dangling a test tube in front of caneras and saying Iraq has WMDs

Ill glady review the evidence you claim to have seen. please by all means post it here

This is like saying I will not take any scientific evidence from the NIH because they are "deep state medicine"
Bottom line is the vast majority of Congressmen and Trump himself believe.

Thus you get tin foil hat.
This same deep state told us about the virus BEFORE any other government agency.
And you will buy this.

All you do is regularly contradict yourself.
Putin good, Assad good.
I put up tons of good reporting on this as well but you brushed it aside. You will use MSM WaPo and NYT for the virus, but not for things you dont want to believe.

[Spurs Homer]

Tinfoil is believing the “evidence” presented by our “intelligence” as proof that Russia interfered.

please post the “insurmountable evidence” of this

there simply isnt. and some officials parroting there is is equivalent to Colin Powell dangling a test tube in front of caneras and saying Iraq has WMDs

Ill glady review the evidence you claim to have seen. please by all means post it here


Common sense will take you far - far enough to see the evidence publicly available.

1) The Mueller report - which is still being covered up for a reason by Barr. Even with all the redactions and even WITHOUT the Grand Jury information - that the DOJ and the Trump administration are BEGGING the SCOTUS to NOT release-even accounting for all that - just reading the 400 page Mueller report is enough if you have common sense.

2) Your own eyes and ears. You saw and heard trump inviting russia. Trump jr saying “i love it” and taking the mtg to collude. 16000 lies in your face from the biggest pathological liar on the planet. Thousands of other lies by EVERY TRUMP TEAM sycophant regarding their russia contacts.

3) the dozen indicted russians (read the mueller report), manafort in prison, cohen in prison, flynn under oath saying “i plead guilty - because i am - in fact - guilty, stone guilty, wikileaks hacking dnc for russia,

4) DOZENS upon DOZENS of sworn hearing transcripts - (Ive read every one - before the tons released yesterday - which i will read as time permits) - in those hearings you are provided overwhelming evidence

5) many books available regarding trump and deutsche bank and his russian money laundering
6) trump doing deals in russia and promising putin rewards - DURING his 2016 campaign while he denied it - TO YOUR FACE!

7) COMMON FUCKiNG SENSE
8) Trump asks comey to let flynn go- comey wont play along- trump fires the guy investigating him and then goes into the oval office and reports to the russians (after getting rid of american media- but inviting russian media) “i got rid of comey because of the investigation- we are clear now!
9) trump standing next to putin in helsinki pledging loyalty to russia and betraying the usa- again - IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES AND EARS
10) unanimous CONCLUSION of all USA intelligence- that russia interfered to help trump - common sense tells you - NOTHING is ever unanimous - for over a hundred years we have relied on usa intel - except when the orange con man brainwashed his cult that HE was clean and THEY were dirty - common fucking sense- ill take the usa intel over con man 100 times out of 100.


I could list more but why? You prefer to be lied to - you do NOT want the truth.

[hater]

1) The Mueller report says Russia interfered but provides no definite details nor proof. Another Iraq WMDs hoax wake upe.
2) Thats basically nothingburger
3) Manafort and Cohen were not found guilty of colluding w Russia. Flynn is home fuckin his wife raw. The indicted Russians case was dropped after they requested Discovery, Muller folded there. nothing there either
4) Please post some of these.
5) Please post links to these
6) Does not prove Russia intefered
7) Common sense tells me there is no evidence.
8) Another irrelevant point
9) That didnt happen
10) please post this unanimous conclusion. all I know is the paper about the 7 agencies that said “probable or likely” but provided no proof. oh and most agencies backtracked later

just anothe Iraq WMDs hoax so far.

but please post this “evidence” and I will gladly study it

[hater]

just post your theory even. pretend you are writing a very small book on this. explain in 3 paragraphs how russia interfered in the 2016 election to say a 7th grade class in the year 2035. ofcourse back that up with links

[pgardn]

Basic problem for Trumptards and Putin lovers

Trump continues to be unable to decouple the findings that Russia actively sought to interfere in the last presidential election from the idea that admitting that fact somehow robs him of credit for winning.

[hater]

the basic problem of tinfoil russia hoaxers:

they show no evidence besides parroting deep state assessments

[Spurs Homer]

1) The Mueller report says Russia interfered but provides no definite details nor proof. Another Iraq WMDs hoax wake upe.
2) Thats basically nothingburger
3) Manafort and Cohen were not found guilty of colluding w Russia. Flynn is home fuckin his wife raw. The indicted Russians case was dropped after they requested Discovery, Muller folded there. nothing there either
4) Please post some of these.
5) Please post links to these
6) Does not prove Russia intefered
7) Common sense tells me there is no evidence.
8) Another irrelevant point
9) That didnt happen
10) please post this unanimous conclusion. all I know is the paper about the 7 agencies that said “probable or likely” but provided no proof. oh and most agencies backtracked later

just anothe Iraq WMDs hoax so far.

but please post this “evidence” and I will gladly study it


You are SPOON-FED - the road map - the transcripts are on a gov website - (House Intelligence Committee) -

everything I gave you is PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE -

but you do not want the truth. You can google exactly where it says that the USA intel community along with the 5 eyes int'l intel - UNANIMOUSLY CONCLUDED that Russia interfered to help trump and hurt HRC - that is also public knowledge -


but you REFUSE to believe your own eyes and ears.

I have posted ( the entire planet witnessed the Helsinki debacle - it is on youtube) that Helsinki video several times.

It cannot be explained any other way than what I said - Trumps is asked who do you believe - USA intel which unanimously concluded that Putin directed Russia to attack the USA - or Russia? Trump answers


"I have Putin standing next to me - and he was very STRONG in his denial - I have NO REASON to think why it WOULD BE RUSSIA!"

You witnessed it with your eyes and ears - but now - it is ADORABLE -


ADORABLE -

that the ORANGE TRAITOR - has lied to YOUR FACE - over 16000 times - and -




YOU BELIEVE HIM!!!! :lol:lol:lol:lol



Hey little guy - that is really adorable!!! If I was your big bro -

I would think you were adorable for believing the orange turd - and I would muss up your hair and give you a "nuggie" with my knuckles!!!


16000 lies - to YOUR FACE -


and you still BELIEV:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:lol:lol:lol:lol:lo l




:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol

[DMC]

called it

[hater]

called it

ma niga :tu

[hater]

You are SPOON-FED - the road map - the transcripts are on a gov website - (House Intelligence Committee) -

everything I gave you is PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE -

but you do not want the truth. You can google exactly where it says that the USA intel community along with the 5 eyes int'l intel - UNANIMOUSLY CONCLUDED that Russia interfered to help trump and hurt HRC - that is also public knowledge -


but you REFUSE to believe your own eyes and ears.

I have posted ( the entire planet witnessed the Helsinki debacle - it is on youtube) that Helsinki video several times.

It cannot be explained any other way than what I said - Trumps is asked who do you believe - USA intel which unanimously concluded that Putin directed Russia to attack the USA - or Russia? Trump answers


"I have Putin standing next to me - and he was very STRONG in his denial - I have NO REASON to think why it WOULD BE RUSSIA!"

You witnessed it with your eyes and ears - but now - it is ADORABLE -


ADORABLE -

that the ORANGE TRAITOR - has lied to YOUR FACE - over 16000 times - and -




YOU BELIEVE HIM!!!! :lol:lol:lol:lol



Hey little guy - that is really adorable!!! If I was your big bro -

I would think you were adorable for believing the orange turd - and I would muss up your hair and give you a "nuggie" with my knuckles!!!


16000 lies - to YOUR FACE -


and you still BELIEV:clap:clap:clap:clap:clap:lol:lol:lol:lol:lo l




:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol

a lot of ranting but no evidence provided

[Spurs Homer]

a lot of ranting but no evidence provided


16000 times


in your face

but HE is your north star!

:lol:lol:lol

[Officer Dump Chumper]

hater, I'm going to have to write you up.
This thread already exists and in the safest possible
framework for the Chumpettes for whom I serve and protect.

[ChumpDumper]

hater, I'm going to have to write you up.
This thread already exists and in the safest possible
framework for the Chumpettes for whom I serve and protect.lol salty alt derp

[Spurtacular]

lol salty alt derp

Is hater an attention whore for not using your Chumpette sanctioned thread?

[ChumpDumper]

Is hater an attention whore for not using your Chumpette sanctioned thread?Sure, hater's always been an attention whore.

[Spurtacular]

Sure, hater's always been an attention whore.

Are you an attention whore?

[ChumpDumper]

Are you an attention whore?I'm biased when it comes to me, so I'll defer to others. It's all a matter of opinion.

[Spurtacular]

I'm biased when it comes to me, so I'll defer to others. It's all a matter of opinion.

You're biased towards the side that you're not an attention whore?

[ChumpDumper]

You're biased towards the side that you're not an attention whore?Biased towards not making a big deal out of being called an attention whore like you're doing.

[Spurtacular]

Biased towards not making a big deal out of being called an attention whore like you're doing.

This statement belies your actions. You've made a big deal of calling people attention whores on many occasions.

[ChumpDumper]

This statement belies your actions. You've made a big deal of calling people attention whores on many occasions.I say it when it happens.

You're going on and on about it and using your alts because you got called out.

It's a really big deal to you.

[Spurtacular]

I say it when it [supposedly] happens.

Because it's a big deal to you.

[ChumpDumper]

Because it's a big deal to you.It happened. Don't lie about what I said. You're still going on about it.

[Spurtacular]

It happened. Don't lie about what I said. You're still going on about it.

I've lied about nothing. It's a big deal for you to worry about who is an attention whore, according to you.
You've performed in this capacity a great many times.

[ChumpDumper]

I've lied about nothing. It's a big deal for you to worry about who is an attention whore, according to you.
You've performed in this capacity a great many times.I say it when it happens. Sorry.

You're going on and on about it after you were called out on it in a totally different thread using multiple alts.

It is most important to you.

And you're not going to stop.

Because it is more important to you than it is to anyone else.

lol derp

[Spurs Homer]

a lot of ranting but no evidence provided

This is just ONE example - just ONE - which you cannot and will not explain away - because you dont want the truth.
This is from USA intel - and although it has been DE-classified - when this was given to Trump - along with a FULL CLASSIFIED BRIEFING - in January 2017 - this was what was found as of the end of 2016.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf



This intel is a confirmation of this:


We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the USpresidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assessPutin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. Wehave high confidence in these judgments.


and a lot more. You wont read it - but there are goldmines in there that dispels all of the propaganda spewed by cultists and right wing conspiracists - and this was only what was available at the end of 2016. The Mueller report detailed more treasonous behavior - even though

1) Mueller hands were tied by Rosenstein - and later - Barr
2) Mueller report is still under a cover up

This intel was -

given to Trump with a full classified briefing. Now 44 other presidents would have received this intel - and immediately proceeded to begin to protect the country. 44 Presidents - knowing that they had a duty to protect the USA from this type of an attack - would have had zero problem standing behind this Intel assessment - UNLESS THEY WERE GUILTY of something nefarious.

Guess what president #45 did? He went on the attack - against - the USA intel. For months he called it fake news and deep state and never ONCE - when asked - did he or could he EVER CONFIRM THAT RUSSIA attacked the USA. To this day he still has NEVER ONCE - confirmed that RUSSIA did what they did in 2016 -


Even though he had this Intel assessment - and had a full classified briefing on it. He could NOT bring himself to ever defend the USA - because of the stupidity and ineptness of the USA media - it took months before he was asked the following question:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBtsNNXjBPw

and see how he answered.


You have eyes and ears.


Tell me how a president - sworn to defend the USA constitution against all enemies - and here he is in this video standing next to the guy that ordered the attack - and I have provided the report for you - declassified -

but trump had the full classified intel -


how in the fuck - is it ok - to answer in the way he did?


You have eyes and ears - you KNOW why -


He works for that person and that country he defended.


This is but ONE example - for you - with the evidence you were crying about -

if only you trusted your own eyes and ears instead of -

the biggest liar on the planet after he lied to your face 16000 times.

[Spurtacular]

I say it when it happens. Sorry.

You're apologizing for making it a big deal every time. Okay. :tu

[ChumpDumper]

You're apologizing for making it a big deal every time. Okay. :tuNope.

You're still talking about it.:tu

[Spurtacular]

Nope.

You're still talking about it.:tu

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.You're still talking about it.:tu

[Spurtacular]

You're still talking about it.:tu

I'm fine with you having that tiny w.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

I'm fine with you having that tiny w.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.You're still talking about it.

[Spurtacular]

You're still talking about it.

Sure, have that tiny w.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

Sure, have that tiny w.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.You're still talking about it.

[Spurtacular]

You're still talking about it.

Blake has used this cuckbot defense too.

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

Blake has used this cuckbot defense too.

:lolNothing more I need to say if you keep talking about it because it's so important to you.

[Spurtacular]

Nothing more I need to say if you keep talking about it because it's so important to you.

Sure, you're free to walk away like a coward.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

Sure, you're free to walk away like a coward.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.:lol this is so important to you

[pgardn]

Sure, you're free to walk away like a coward.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

I am biased by your posts.

You are a fckn idiot incel boy.

[Spurtacular]

:lol this is so important to you

Sure.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

I am biased by your posts.

Absolutely. A lot of bitterness comes with being shat on so much. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

Sure.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.:lolYou're still talking about it.

[Spurtacular]

:lolYou're still talking about it.

Still running.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

[Spurs Homer]

Still running.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

Dude - you are such a fragile pussy - every post of yours I see - I immediately think of this;



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EY7lYRneHc

[Spurtacular]

Dude - you are such a fragile pussy - every post of yours I see - I immediately think of this;



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EY7lYRneHc

Chump should harden the fuck up and answer the question. :tu

[ChumpDumper]

Chump should harden the fuck up and answer the question. :tuWhy should I? All you're doing it proving me right.:tu

[Spurtacular]

Why should I? All you're doing it proving me right.:tu

You've been attention whoring, post after post, after whining about others supposedly doing it. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

You've been attention whoring, post after post, after whining about others supposedly doing it. :lmao:lol you're still talking about it, showing it's really, really important to you.

Now do it again, proving you can't stop yourself.:tu

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're still talking about it, showing it's really, really important to you.

Now do it again, proving you can't stop yourself.:tu

Oh, look; more attention whoring.

[ChumpDumper]

Oh, look; more attention whoring.So you're challenging me to stop posting in this thread?

OK. Done.:tu

I challenge you to keep whoring here.

[Spurtacular]

So you're challenging me to stop posting in this thread?

OK. Done.:tu

I challenge you to keep whoring here.

Not being an attention whore is not a challenge you're up for.

I'm challenging you to answer a question.

Is your biased opinion that you are an attention whore?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Attention Whore Chump not up to the challenge.

[Spurtacular]

Wiretapping a guy who has not committed a crime.


President Obama (https://www.foxnews.com/category/person/barack-obama) was aware of the details of then-incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn's intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, apparently surprising then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-fires-acting-ag-after-justice-department-staff-told-not-to-defend-refugee-order), according to documents released (https://www.scribd.com/document/460387217/Doc-198-Govt-Motion-to-Dismiss-Criminal-Information-With-Exhibits-05-07-20) Thursday as exhibits (https://www.scribd.com/document/460387217/Doc-198-Govt-Motion-to-Dismiss-Criminal-Information-With-Exhibits-05-07-20) to the government's motion to dismiss the Flynn case.
Obama's unexpectedly intimate knowledge of the details of Flynn's calls, which the FBI acknowledged at the time (http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-reviewed-flynns-calls-with-russian-ambassador-but-found-nothing-illicit/2017/01/23/aa83879a-e1ae-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html) were not criminal or even improper, raised eyebrows because of his own history with Flynn -- and because top FBI officials secretly discussed (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/michael-flynn-fbi-handwritten-notes-get-him-lie-fired) whether their goal was to "get [Flynn] fired" when they interviewed him in the White House on January 24, 2017.
Obama personally had warned the Trump administration against hiring Flynn, and made clear he was "not a fan," according (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/08/obama-warn-trump-michael-flynn-238116) to multiple officials. Obama had fired Flynn as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014; Obama cited insubordination, while Flynn asserted he was pushed out for his aggressive stance on combating lslamic extremism.
READ THE DOJ'S MOTION TO DISMISS W/ EXHIBITS (https://www.scribd.com/document/460387217/Doc-198-Govt-Motion-to-Dismiss-Criminal-Information-With-Exhibits-05-07-20)
On January 5, 2017, Yates attended an Oval Office meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Vice President Joe Biden (https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1258495491450589191), then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, according to the newly declassified documents, including an FD-302 FBI witness report. They were discussing Russian election interference, along with national security adviser Susan Rice and other members of the national security council.
After the briefing, Obama asked Yates and Comey to "stay behind," and said he had "learned of the information about Flynn" and his conversation with Russia's ambassador about sanctions. Obama "specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information."
A previous memo from Rice (https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1258495491450589191) stated that Biden also stayed behind after the main briefing had ended.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-knew-details-of-wiretapped-flynn-phone-calls-surprising-top-doj-official-new-docs-show

[in2deep]

the basic problem of tinfoil russia hoaxers:

they show no evidence besides parroting deep state assessments

agree

brainwashed sheeple

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5XLyJgwTQM

[hater]

They will clutch onto the russian hoax till their deaths. That we know.

But it wont go anywhere in reality.

Just another agenda of the Deep States Ministry of Truth(minitrue) which serves to spread falsification of historical events

[Spurtacular]

They will clutch onto the russian hoax till their deaths. That we know.

But it wont go anywhere in reality.

Just another agenda of the Deep States Ministry of Truth(minitrue) which serves to spread falsification of historical events

Onto the next hoax is all.

Literally the day after this hoax failed, the next one was announced. :lol

TheGreatYacht (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=43719)

[Spurtacular]

No Chumpette thread on this? It's funny how they don't make them when they ain't gloating. :lol


Trump is big winner and Sessions is big loser in Tuesday primaries, while Dems remain divided

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/doug-schoen-trump-is-big-winner-in-tuesday-primaries-while-democrats-remain-divided

[hater]

No Chumpette thread on this? It's funny how they don't make them when they ain't gloating. :lol



https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/doug-schoen-trump-is-big-winner-in-tuesday-primaries-while-democrats-remain-divided

Looks like a other Trump anihilation coming up tbqh

Mainstream media quiet as a mouse. Their periodic Biden leading "polls" are so similar to the Hillary winning polls as well.

Cant believe Trump will win despite not being able yo use his strongest weapon, the Trump Rallies :lmao

Holy shit.

Oh and :lmao Biden

[Spurtacular]

Looks like a other Trump anihilation coming up tbqh

Mainstream media quiet as a mouse. Their periodic Biden leading "polls" are so similar to the Hillary winning polls as well.

Cant believe Trump will win despite not being able yo use his strongest weapon, the Trump Rallies :lmao

Holy shit.

Oh and :lmao Biden

I've been saying it forever that these polls (like the news) are manufactured.

[ElNono]

No Chumpette thread on this? It's funny how they don't make them when they ain't gloating. :lol

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/doug-schoen-trump-is-big-winner-in-tuesday-primaries-while-democrats-remain-divided

Commented on a different thread, :tu:tu:tu on Sessions getting the F out.

[Spurtacular]

Commented on a different thread, :tu:tu:tu on Sessions getting the F out.

No chumpette was rooting for that before it happened.
Ya'll were rooting for Sessions. We know how your TDS works at this point. :tu:tu:tu:tu

[ElNono]

No chumpette was rooting for that before it happened.
Ya'll were rooting for Sessions. We know how your TDS works at this point. :tu:tu:tu:tu

link/quote where I was rooting for Sessions?

Didn't Trump's endorsed candidates lost a couple of races recently? I don't think most of the people here lapped that up? (boutons notwithstanding).

I think you're the one with the TDS.

[ChumpDumper]

No chumpette was rooting for that before it happened.
Ya'll were rooting for Sessions. We know how your TDS works at this point. :tu:tu:tu:tu:lmao mad at Trump's failure hiring Sessions.

[Spurtacular]

Didn't Trump's endorsed candidates lost a couple of races recently? I don't think most of the people here lapped that up? (boutons notwithstanding).


Sure the have. Especially high profile losses. Sorry, there would of been a gloat parade if Sessions won. We all know it.

[ElNono]

Sure the have. Especially high profile losses. Sorry, there would of been a gloat parade if Sessions won. We all know it.

Well, don't add me there. My first post about that race (before even this thread) was :tu:tu:tu Sessions lost, tbh

[Spurtacular]

Well, don't add me there. My first post about that race (before even this thread) was :tu:tu:tu Sessions lost, tbh

Well congrats if you're the exception to the rule.

[daboom1]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1389675558964023297?s=19

[Ef-man]

Beep Boop

:lmao Trump, the idiot that keeps on giving.

Former MI6 spy Christopher Steele produced a 2nd dossier on Trump while he was president, report says.

The former British spy who published a dossier that made explosive claims about Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and Russia produced a second, previously unreported dossier during Trump's presidency, The Telegraph reported on Monday.

Christopher Steele's first dossier was leaked to and published by BuzzFeed in January 2017.

That report detailed numerous claims of ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, and it came to the attention of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the FBI as they investigated Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

The document also contained claims that Russia had incriminating material on Trump, including a tape of him with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room in 2013.

Some of its allegations have proved true, though much still remains uncorroborated. Trump has denounced it as false.

The Telegraph, citing unnamed sources, reported that Steele produced for the FBI a second dossier on Trump during his presidency, which lasted from January 2017 to January 2021.

The Telegraph wrote that the second document "contains raw intelligence that makes further claims of Russian meddling in the US election and also references claims regarding the existence of further sex tapes."

The newspaper also said the second dossier relied on different sources from the first one.

It also said the existence of a second dossier suggested the FBI was confident in the material in his first dossier.

Insider was unable to reach the FBI for comment and has contacted Trump's office for comment.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/former-mi6-spy-christopher-steele-produced-a-2nd-dossier-on-trump-while-he-was-president-report-says/ar-BB1gl9HW?ocid=msedgntp

[hater]

Beep Boop

:lmao Trump, the idiot that keeps on giving.

Former MI6 spy Christopher Steele produced a 2nd dossier on Trump while he was president, report says.

The former British spy who published a dossier that made explosive claims about Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and Russia produced a second, previously unreported dossier during Trump's presidency, The Telegraph reported on Monday.

Christopher Steele's first dossier was leaked to and published by BuzzFeed in January 2017.

That report detailed numerous claims of ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, and it came to the attention of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the FBI as they investigated Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

The document also contained claims that Russia had incriminating material on Trump, including a tape of him with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room in 2013.

Some of its allegations have proved true, though much still remains uncorroborated. Trump has denounced it as false.

The Telegraph, citing unnamed sources, reported that Steele produced for the FBI a second dossier on Trump during his presidency, which lasted from January 2017 to January 2021.

The Telegraph wrote that the second document "contains raw intelligence that makes further claims of Russian meddling in the US election and also references claims regarding the existence of further sex tapes."

The newspaper also said the second dossier relied on different sources from the first one.

It also said the existence of a second dossier suggested the FBI was confident in the material in his first dossier.

Insider was unable to reach the FBI for comment and has contacted Trump's office for comment.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/former-mi6-spy-christopher-steele-produced-a-2nd-dossier-on-trump-while-he-was-president-report-says/ar-BB1gl9HW?ocid=msedgntp

:lmao 2nd steele dossier

:lol


When you first fail, try and try again :lmao

[Winehole23]

#StillWithHim crew getting nervous

[Ef-man]

:lmao 2nd steele dossier

:lol


When you first fail, try and try again :lmao

Your #stillwithhim tax dollars paid for it.

:lmao

[Cuck Ross]

Beep Boop

:lmao Trump, the idiot that keeps on giving.

Former MI6 spy Christopher Steele produced a 2nd dossier on Trump while he was president, report says.

The former British spy who published a dossier that made explosive claims about Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and Russia produced a second, previously unreported dossier during Trump's presidency, The Telegraph reported on Monday.

Christopher Steele's first dossier was leaked to and published by BuzzFeed in January 2017.

That report detailed numerous claims of ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, and it came to the attention of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the FBI as they investigated Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

The document also contained claims that Russia had incriminating material on Trump, including a tape of him with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room in 2013.

Some of its allegations have proved true, though much still remains uncorroborated. Trump has denounced it as false.

The Telegraph, citing unnamed sources, reported that Steele produced for the FBI a second dossier on Trump during his presidency, which lasted from January 2017 to January 2021.

The Telegraph wrote that the second document "contains raw intelligence that makes further claims of Russian meddling in the US election and also references claims regarding the existence of further sex tapes."

The newspaper also said the second dossier relied on different sources from the first one.

It also said the existence of a second dossier suggested the FBI was confident in the material in his first dossier.

Insider was unable to reach the FBI for comment and has contacted Trump's office for comment.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/former-mi6-spy-christopher-steele-produced-a-2nd-dossier-on-trump-while-he-was-president-report-says/ar-BB1gl9HW?ocid=msedgntp

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Damn, blake. Even your fellow cucks are laughing at you.

[hater]

:lmao

:lmao stupid fucking muppets

[Ef-man]

Derptacular thinks everyone is Blake! :lmao. :lmao

Per mental health professionals, this happens when you have below average intelligence.


:tu

[Ball Buster]

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1391083274181677057?s=21

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1391083288433942530?s=21

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1391083292464664576?s=21

[hater]

"Everything is possible"

"Low to moderate confidence" :lmao

"Theres no reason not to investigate"


:lmao

[pgardn]

Russia interfered in our elections.
The Trump administration knew bout it and welcomed the interference.
Trump himself knew and knows Russia interfered in our elections.

And so the hoax is... what?

The Meuller report brought the solidly out, the red team knows it.

And Flynn is a liar and a felon who would be in jail if not for a pardon given by possibly the most corrupt president in modern history. I can get a loan easier than Trump in the US... this is a pitiful reminder of what a lying, cheating asshole he is.

[Ball Buster]

Item: To this day, neither the FBI nor any other law enforcement agency has even asked to examine the DNC server that was allegedly hacked. Astoundingly, they have simply taken at face value the assessment of CrowdStrike, the firm hired by the DNC itself, and headed by a well-known bitterly anti-Putin Russian expatriate. How’s that for investigative thoroughness and impartiality?

[Ball Buster]

Item: By far, the most serious forensic analysis of the “hack that wasn’t,” comes from the work of William Binney, former technical director of the NSA and now a leader of the veteran intelligence professionals for sanity. Mr. Binney clearly demonstrates that the recorded speed of the download of the cited e-mails to Wikileaks was almost double the maximum rate possible using even the most advanced technology via the internet, but well within the limits for a (far faster) direct transmission using a thumb drive or other storage device. Therefore, it had to be a leak, not a hack from Russia or anyplace else. Why was there zero effort by team Mueller to interview or consult with this man?

[Ball Buster]

Item: The much-ballyhooed “unanimous consensus” of the seventeen U.S. Intelligence Services that bad Vlad and his minions were culpable, has been shown to be a multilevel fraud. It turns out that their document was written by representatives of just four — no, make that three — agencies, each one of whom was handpicked because of their known proclivities to write just what they did. Even then, the best they could manage was “high confidence” for two of the services and a mere “moderate confidence” for the third, in the soundness of their conclusions. As Mr. Binney has quipped, these phrases are bureaucratic doublespeak for “We have no hard evidence, but this is our best guess.” Yet the Mueller report rubber-stamped their judgment as revealed truth.

[Ball Buster]

Item: Based on the near-reverential deference and adulation being lavished on Robert Mueller and the U.S. intelligence community generally by many of the “resist” crowd, one might think that these folks have had an unblemished record of competence and truthfulness as the core of their reputation. But aren’t these the same institutions that told us in December 1964 that North Vietnam had attacked American ships in the Gulf of Tonkin? That Saddam Hussein’s troops were killing helpless little tots in Kuwait by disconnecting baby incubators in 1990? Or that Iraq itself was one big arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of that nation? Robert Mueller was personally, actively involved in disseminating that latter deadly fraud. Exactly when did he and his “intel” cohorts ascend from that sordid activity to achieve sainthood status?

[spurraider21]

bull buster lives for this story. posting snippets from 2019 baltimore sun articles and shit

[ElNono]

bull buster lives for this story. posting snippets from 2019 baltimore sun articles and shit

It's actually opinion, IIRC...

[ElNono]

Not to mention it's false as well... According to Crowdstrike:
- We worked closely with law enforcement and provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI as requested.

[hater]

Not to mention it's false as well... According to Crowdstrike:
- We worked closely with law enforcement and provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI as requested.

Yeah but Russia hoax is falser

[Spurtacular]

Yeah but Russia hoax is falser

But the same people who tried that scam did an honest and fair election.

Pick a lane, Karen.

[ElNono]

Yeah but Russia hoax is falser

I agreed with the Mueller report conclusions, tbh

[Ball Buster]

https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1395709981773770756?s=21

[hater]

I agreed with the Mueller report conclusions, tbh

A person can agree to anything. Doesnt make it fact.

Mueller report has zero evidence of russia hoax claims. Because it was 100% complete fabrication.

[Winehole23]

The post-9/11 pivot to domestic and international counterterrrorism guaranteed the acromegaly of the deep state; four years of weak, authoritarian and incompetent leadership have awarded US armed forces and the deep state more discretion than they ever had before.

US history with it's deep state extension and it's paranoid expression and its current mania for national renewal, is rapidly acquiring a Turkish flavor. Power fraught with internal enemies.

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1395709981773770756?s=21

OJ is still looking for the real killers too.

[Ball Buster]

OJ is still looking for the real killers too.

Beg pardon?

[ChumpDumper]

Beg pardon?He said it in an interview!

[spurraider21]

its about as convincing as that time the cat said that he was not a cat

[Ball Buster]

He said it in an interview!

Biggest lie the US news media has purported since WMDs found in Iraq. More people believe this conspiracy theory then Q anon.

I think it’s an interesting topic.

[ChumpDumper]

Biggest lie the US news media has purported since WMDs found in Iraq. More people believe this conspiracy theory then Q anon.

I think it’s an interesting topic.People think OJ is innocent too.

[Ball Buster]

People think OJ is innocent too.

Why is it the first thing you think of is a black man murdering a white woman? Racist.

[ChumpDumper]

Why is it the first thing you think of is a black man murdering a white woman? Racist.Seemed an apt comparison.

I can give white examples if that will soothe you.

Do you think OJ is innocent of the murders?

Yes or no.

[spurraider21]

Why is it the first thing you think of is a black man murdering a white woman? Racist.
one could argue it would be racist to avoid that example specifically because he was a black man murdering a white woman

[Ball Buster]

Seemed an apt comparison.

I can give white examples if that will soothe you.

Do you think OJ is innocent of the murders?

Yes or no.

No.

Do you think Russians hacked the 16 election causing Trump to win?

[ChumpDumper]

No.
So interviewing the accused isn't terribly useful as they are free to lie.:tu


Do you think Russians hacked the 16 election causing Trump to win?Define "hacked."

I find imprecise language leads to very stupid assumptions and conclusions.

That said, I don't think anything Russia did to influence the 2016 election had more effect than Clinton's shitty campaign or Comey's letter.

[Ball Buster]

I don't think anything Russia did to influence the 2016 election had more effect than Clinton's shitty campaign or Comey's letter.

Thank you.

[ChumpDumper]

Thank you.I've said that over and and over and over and you Trump apologists can never accept it.

So remember it this time.

Are you not going to define hacking?

[Ball Buster]

I've said that over and and over and over and you Trump apologists can never accept it.

So remember it this time.

Are you not going to define hacking?

Not a Trump apologist, try to remember this time. :lol

Like you said there wasn't any hacking on any large scale or sophistication to affect anything really. Mainstream news sources made a huge deal about for over 4 years now.

There was a Russian troll farm. It was a small shanty office with a few people working there. Greaty over-stated by US news media.

[ChumpDumper]

Not a Trump apologist, try to remember this time. :lol

Like you said there wasn't any hacking on any large scale or sophistication to affect anything really. Mainstream news sources made a huge deal about for over 4 years now.

There was a Russian troll farm. It was a small shanty office with a few people working there. Greaty over-stated by US news media.:lol QAnon proves you don't need a lot of people to have a stupidly outsized influence on the internet.

One small group of people fooled millions of rubes including a bunch of people here who are trying to deny it.

[Ball Buster]

:lol QAnon proves you don't need a lot of people to have a stupidly outsized influence on the internet.

One small group of people fooled millions of rubes including a bunch of people here who are trying to deny it.

So the media is not overstating the dangerous Russian hacks.

OK.

Has the media, New York Times or MSNBC, ever had to retract any of their Russia gate reporting? What did you think about that Russia putting bounties on US soldiers story... Does Hillary exaggerates?

[Bogie]

Not a Trump apologist, try to remember this time. :lol

Like you said there wasn't any hacking on any large scale or sophistication to affect anything really. Mainstream news sources made a huge deal about for over 4 years now.

There was a Russian troll farm. It was a small shanty office with a few people working there. Greaty over-stated by US news media.

Can you cite a source that the Russian troll farm was a small shanty office with a few people?

and can you cite the section of the mueller report that exonerated trump?

[Ball Buster]

Can you cite a source that the Russian troll farm was a small shanty office with a few people?

and can you cite the section of the mueller report that exonerated trump?

Can you cite evidence of Russian interference in the Mueller report?

https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2018/03/15/trollfactory-02-edit-1ee01ddb483b3d82e72ad21bbb797b32fa921713-s800-c85.webp

[TSA]

and can you cite the section of the mueller report that exonerated trump?

"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

“The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

"The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

"The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

"The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

"The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download

[Bogie]

"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

“The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

"The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

"The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

"The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

"The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download


You logged into both accounts to do this?

btw what was your response to being called a retard for being a piece of shit q follower?

oh and where does it say they were exonerated in there?

[ChumpDumper]

So the media is not overstating the dangerous Russian hacks.I think you're really trying to downplay Russian interference efforts for whatever reason. It probably has something to do with Trump.


Has the media, New York Times or MSNBC, ever had to retract any of their Russia gate reporting? What did you think about that Russia putting bounties on US soldiers story... Does Hillary exaggerates?You'll have to cite specific examples of stories you think should be retracted by the media.

You're just starting to throw shit at the wall now.

[ChumpDumper]

You logged into both accounts to do this?I guess technically he can say he's still ignoring me?


btw what was your response to being called a retard for being a piece of shit q follower?:lol sheer embarrassment

[TSA]

:lol thinking I’m Ball Buster

[Ball Buster]

You're just starting to throw shit at the wall now.

Not really.

You're semen-shielding for liars in political office. And, you out yourself as gullible for believing planted stories about Russia in the US news media.

[ChumpDumper]

Not really.

You're semen-shielding for liars in political office. And, you out yourself as gullible for believing planted stories about Russia in the US news media.
So cite those stories.

[Bogie]

:lol thinking I’m Ball Buster

You’re most definitely a retard though. How does that make you feel to know that you’re so fucking scared and stupid you fall for conspiracy lies.

The lawyer said you’re a retard. That has to hurt.

And where was the exoneration? Why did mueller say if they thought Trump was innocent, they would have said so?

You’re a Q retard

[ChumpDumper]

:lol thinking I’m Ball BusterMeh, it's a guessing game.

[Ball Buster]

So cite those stories.

Already asked about the fake Russian bounty story. How about a story about proof of Russian interference :lol

[Bogie]

Already asked about the fake Russian bounty story. How about a story about proof of Russian interference :lol


Youre the one that’s making the assertion. You get to prove it. Cite your sources.

[ChumpDumper]

Already asked about the fake Russian bounty story.Cite the actual media article you think should be retracted.

If you don't and just start melting down, we can guess you're derp.

[TSA]

You’re most definitely a retard though. How does that make you feel to know that you’re so fucking scared and stupid you fall for conspiracy lies.

The lawyer said you’re a retard. That has to hurt.

And where was the exoneration? Why did mueller say if they thought Trump was innocent, they would have said so?

You’re a Q retard

You’re most definitely a retard though. How does that make you feel to know that you’re so fucking scared and stupid you fall for conspiracy lies.

Mueller said you're a retard. That has to hurt.

You’re a collusion retard

[Ball Buster]

Cite the actual media article you think should be retracted.

If you don't and just start melting down, we can guess you're derp.

I'm melting down... This is so hard :cry

https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/cnn-announcement-retracted-article/index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/06/27/the-cnn-retraction-and-the-danger-of-relying-on-one-anonymous-source/

https://apnews.com/article/lawrence-odonnell-donald-trump-ap-top-news-politics-entertainment-5f32c14a803e43359dff5e8151dade4c

https://www.businessinsider.com/washington-post-nyt-retract-reports-fbi-warned-giuliani-over-russia-2021-5

https://theintercept.com/2019/01/20/beyond-buzzfeed-the-10-worst-most-embarrassing-u-s-media-failures-on-the-trumprussia-story/

Should I stop?

This is why even the Republican chodes on this forum can dunk on you so easily when it comes to this bs. :lol

[Thread]

You’re most definitely a retard though. How does that make you feel to know that you’re so fucking scared and stupid you fall for conspiracy lies.

Mueller said you're a retard. That has to hurt.

You’re a collusion retard

Then they put him on-the-spot there at the last and the poor thing became incoherent.

[Bogie]

You’re most definitely a retard though. How does that make you feel to know that you’re so fucking scared and stupid you fall for conspiracy lies.

Mueller said you're a retard. That has to hurt.

You’re a collusion retard


where did mueller say trump was innocent? In fact, why did he say in his press conference that if they thought Trump was innocent, they would have put it in the report?

why are you a retard?

[Bogie]

Then they put him on-the-spot there at the last and the poor thing became incoherent.

chicken shit dale.

[TSA]

where did mueller say trump was innocent? In fact, why did he say in his press conference that if they thought Trump was innocent, they would have put it in the report?

why are you a retard?

You are conflating collusion and obstruction like the true retard you are.

[Bogie]

You are conflating collusion and obstruction like the true retard you are.


So now you’re admitting trump and Barr obstructed the investigation

You are truly truly stupid No wonder the people that think for you call you a retard.

[TSA]

So now you’re admitting trump and Barr obstructed the investigation

You are truly truly stupid No wonder the people that think for you call you a retard.

Only a retard would come to that conclusion from my statement.

[Bogie]

Only a retard would come to that conclusion from my statement.


you’re the one said mueller said there was obstruction, and you never said you disagreed. So you’re saying there was obstruction.

you really are incredibly incredibly stupid. This is why the q people that think for you call you a retard. You’re literally intellectually disabled.

[hater]

Then they put him on-the-spot there at the last and the poor thing became incoherent.

Poor Mueller. They really took a shit on that mans career. Did they really think it was a good idea to trot his senile ass out there? :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I'm melting down... This is so hard :cry

https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/cnn-announcement-retracted-article/index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/06/27/the-cnn-retraction-and-the-danger-of-relying-on-one-anonymous-source/

https://apnews.com/article/lawrence-odonnell-donald-trump-ap-top-news-politics-entertainment-5f32c14a803e43359dff5e8151dade4c

https://www.businessinsider.com/washington-post-nyt-retract-reports-fbi-warned-giuliani-over-russia-2021-5

https://theintercept.com/2019/01/20/beyond-buzzfeed-the-10-worst-most-embarrassing-u-s-media-failures-on-the-trumprussia-story/

Should I stop?

This is why even the Republican chodes on this forum can dunk on you so easily when it comes to this bs. :lol

So you're showing examples of stories that were actually retracted?

:lolK

Thanks for proving the media acted responsibly when new information was made available. You just dunked on yourself.

[hater]

So you're showing examples of stories that were actually retracted?

:lolK

Thanks for proving the media acted responsibly when new information was made available. You just dunked on yourself.

Retracted fake news are still fake news. They already did the damage.

Thats why cnn,etc still do it. Doesnt matter if its retracted. Damage is done

[ChumpDumper]

Retracted fake news are still fake news. They already did the damage.

Thats why cnn,etc still do it. Doesnt matter if its retracted. Damage is done:lol moar conspiracies

[TSA]

you’re the one said mueller said there was obstruction, and you never said you disagreed. So you’re saying there was obstruction.

you really are incredibly incredibly stupid. This is why the q people that think for you call you a retard. You’re literally intellectually disabled.

Just take your L and move on. The quotes are right here for anyone to see.

[TSA]

Retracted fake news are still fake news. They already did the damage.

Thats why cnn,etc still do it. Doesnt matter if its retracted. Damage is done

Adding a footnote to a 6 month old online article that no one is going to re-read to say they completely fucked up and got the story wrong :lol

[Ball Buster]

Thanks for proving the media acted responsibly.

You're in a fucking cult. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

Adding a footnote to a 6 month old online article that no one is going to re-read to say they completely fucked up and got the story wrong :lol:lol that's more than you did with your QAnon.


You're in a fucking cult. :lol:lol Trumptard

[Ball Buster]

:lol Trumptard

Yes, anyone who points out the false Russia-gate reporting is a Trump-tard. :lol

You're triggered by the previous President, and you want the planted stories about him to be true.

[ChumpDumper]

Yes, anyone who points out the false Russia-gate reporting is a Trump-tard. :lol

You're triggered by the previous President, and you want the planted stories about him to be true.Planted by whom?

Let's see your full Russian bounty conspiracy theory here.

[ChumpDumper]

Adding a footnote to a 6 month old online article that no one is going to re-read to say they completely fucked up and got the story wrong :lol

Yet, somehow you know they retracted the story.

Go figure.

[Ball Buster]

Planted by whom?

Let's see your full Russian bounty conspiracy theory here.

Explain your Russian conspiracy theory here. Be specific on what you think.

[TSA]

You're triggered by the previous President, and you want the planted stories about him to be true.

Nailed it. I still remember det debunked McClatchy Cohen in Prague story he was pushing.

[ChumpDumper]

Explain your Russian conspiracy theory here. Be specific on what you think.I already have.

You thanked me for telling you.:lol

[Ball Buster]

Nailed it. I still remember det debunked McClatchy Cohen in Prague story he was pushing.

He'll just pretends it never happened, like an adult child of an alcoholic.

Disappointing.

[ChumpDumper]

Nailed it. I still remember det debunked McClatchy Cohen in Prague story he was pushing.I remember you pimped a guy who believes Satanists control jurors using Cat Stevens songs.

[hater]

I remember you pimped a guy who believes Satanists control jurors using Cat Stevens songs.

I remember you called yourself pavlov and pimped the russians peed on trump theory for 4 years :lol

[ChumpDumper]

I mean just mention some keywords and phrases to jar your memories of TSA's conspiracies:

pizza

basement

no no the other basement

Awan brothers

Silsby

Q chillin' outside AF1

Kim Dotcom

Uranium One

Hunter

ritual child sacrifice

I'm sure I could go on.

[ChumpDumper]

I remember you called yourself pavlov and pimped the russians peed on trump theory for 4 years :lol

I remember you said a camera lens is a secret steering wheel.:lol

[hater]

I remember you said a camera lens is a secret steering wheel.:lol

Never said that. Liar

[ChumpDumper]

Never said that. Liar


There is clearly a steering wheel at :31 on your video :lmao :lol :lmao

Holy fuck :lmaoDo you see a camera on the dash?

https://i.gyazo.com/4bfda1cc0d28a9ee4b5e84d39140335c.png

Yes or no.

[hater]

Do you see a camera on the dash?

https://i.gyazo.com/4bfda1cc0d28a9ee4b5e84d39140335c.png

Yes or no.

Never said I didnt

Sorry this is happening to you

[ChumpDumper]

Never said I didnt

There is clearly a steering wheel at :31 on your video :lmao :lol :lmao

Holy fuck :lmao

Watch the video. Freeze at 31 seconds. The passenger is driving the car


:lmao

Sorry this is happening to you


Its clearly a 2nd steering wheel


https://twitter.com/mikehahn_/status/1395778730950287360?s=19

[Spurs Homer]

lol Hater with another "L"

and TSA too chicken-shit

to answer why he disappeared after the failed insurrection led by his hero - the usa traitor

[Thread]

chicken shit dale.

Your mother's waitin', Bogie, get ta fuckin' her some more, son.

[Thread]

lol Hater with another "L"

and TSA too chicken-shit

to answer why he disappeared after the failed insurrection led by his hero - the usa traitor

Homer!!! Sweetheart!!!!!! Pumpkinpuss!!!!!!!!!

Give me two or three words that'll change me life.

[Spurs Homer]

Homer!!! Sweetheart!!!!!! Pumpkinpuss!!!!!!!!!

Give me two or three words that'll change me life.

I’ll give you FOUR- you treasonous piece of shit:

KOBE RAPED.

TRUMP LOST.

now go fuck your mother you unpatriotic traitor scum

[Thread]

I’ll give you FOUR- you treasonous piece of shit:

KOBE RAPED.

TRUMP LOST.

now go fuck your mother you unpatriotic traitor scum

...I'm a trend setter.

I set trends.

[ElNono]

A person can agree to anything. Doesnt make it fact.

Mueller report has zero evidence of russia hoax claims. Because it was 100% complete fabrication.

Based on what? The report established there was no collusion, and the investigation was as thorough and independent as you could possibly ask (to the point that not only charged people with crimes, it actually proved them in a court of law).

Where's your investigation to compare?

[boutons_deux]

The Mueller report was viciously circumscribed in what it could investigate the, eg, no finances.

Repugs "forgot" and lied about the Russian connections before and throughout the investigation,

then Barr BLATANTLY LIED in his 4-pager to trying to exonerate Trash.

Trash trusts Pootin, while trashing 17 US agencies, and has private face to face with Pootin and destroys Trash's translator's notes.

WAY too much SMOKE. Traitorous Trash, his mafiya, Repugs are guilty as hell of working with Pootin to undermine USA.

[pgardn]

Poor Mueller. They really took a shit on that mans career. Did they really think it was a good idea to trot his senile ass out there? :lmao

You got the wrong man per usual.
Meuller did a great job on the report itself.
Schiff ran with the collusion stuff early.

Do you need me to got through Mueller's major findings that no red team member will touch?
Ive done this at least ten times before and it just leads to slack jaw in the bull shiters like you.

[pgardn]

Retracted fake news are still fake news. They already did the damage.

Thats why cnn,etc still do it. Doesnt matter if its retracted. Damage is done

BS

You are a simpleton that cant see what a retraction from a blundering error versus a obvious thought out error is.
When you look at a retraction you can tell if someone is really going to put in the shitter because they just made crap up like you do, versus a very honest mistake that is not a key point.

This again is more conservative BS that you grab a hold of and gulp. READ the fckn retractaction, it tells you a ton. There are retractions that lead to firings versus Tucker Carlson retractions in court that say he is fake anyway so any reasonable person knowns NOT to take him seriously

[hater]

Based on what? The report established there was no collusion, and the investigation was as thorough and independent as you could possibly ask (to the point that not only charged people with crimes, it actually proved them in a court of law).

Where's your investigation to compare?

Exactly. Zero evidence of russia hoax claims (collusion w trump, getting votes for trump, hacking, etc)

None of that was proven. Its not about agreeing or disagreeing. Its facts

[pgardn]

This is where red team member fall flat. And this is why they can actually go to the major news sources that you can believe if its not opinion and find more about them. No one find out anymore about Breitbart, etc... We know what these are. And when red team legislators need to make a real point and a real and egregious blue team error they got straight to the sources they hate.

Hater you have already quoted the NY Times on many ocassions to prove a point because you know it carries weight. You basically stopped putting up RT news because you know its government run and mostly laughable crap.

[pgardn]

Exactly. Zero evidence of russia hoax claims (collusion w trump, getting votes for trump, hacking, etc)

None of that was proven. Its not about agreeing or disagreeing. Its facts

Bull shit again.
Do you need the 3 major points again that the red team cant stomach?

[hater]

Exactly. Zero evidence of russia hoax claims (collusion w trump, getting votes for trump, hacking, etc)

None of that was proven. Its not about agreeing or disagreeing. Its facts

Called it

[pgardn]

Exactly. Zero evidence of russia hoax claims (collusion w trump, getting votes for trump, hacking, etc)

None of that was proven. Its not about agreeing or disagreeing. Its facts

You keep using the word hoax and that the collusion idea was a big stretch.
There is other stuff in that report that is a horrible look for this country from witholding evidence to accepting foreign intervention in elections and WELCOMING it and ADVANCING it. This is how a banana republic would work willing to change governments every month.

[pgardn]

Called it

1. Trump was given information into hacking Demo HQ to hacking of military and financial institutions. This hacking involved the Russian government directly all the way to paying criminal entities within Russia hack anything and everything even for the hackers personal gain as long as it involved US disruption. This hacking has now lead to Russian having a lack of control over this disruption that might lead the US to go offensive on Russian government facilities. Actually we probably already have but wont discuss it, Putin will get the message as he knows all his pipeline stuff to Europe could be in huge jeopardy if we decide to jam it. Putin did nothing to stop it to begin with because Trump did and did not believe it off and on.

Do you want more? There are three more huge points.

[hater]

1. Trump was given information into hacking Demo HQ to hacking of military and financial institutions. This hacking involved the Russian government directly all the way to paying criminal entities within Russia hack anything and everything even for the hackers personal gain as long as it involved US disruption. This hacking has now lead to Russian having a lack of control over this disruption that might lead the US to go offensive on Russian government facilities. Actually we probably already have but wont discuss it, Putin will get the message as he knows all his pipeline stuff to Europe could be in huge jeopardy if we decide to jam it. Putin did nothing to stop it to begin with because Trump did and did not believe it off and on.

Do you want more? There are three more huge points.

No evidence of this. What you just vomited up is pure fake news. Congrats on that :lol

[boutons_deux]

Barr forced the prosecutors to drop the case against Flynn in order to protect Flynn and trash

[ElNono]

Exactly. Zero evidence of russia hoax claims (collusion w trump, getting votes for trump, hacking, etc)

None of that was proven. Its not about agreeing or disagreeing. Its facts

When I say I trust the report's conclusions, that's exactly what I mean. No collusion, Russia tried to interfere (not uncommon and probably not the only country), and obstruction of justice debatable.

[pgardn]

No evidence of this. What you just vomited up is pure fake news. Congrats on that :lol

Its directly in the report.
And then more has been found outside of the report now after Russian non government groups are running a bit wild and doing things Putin does not want.

There is airtight evidence of RUSSIAN government hacking of everything I mentioned. The red team knows and believes this as well. But they certainly dont dwell on it because orange man still has influence.

Deny all you want RT man. Its right in the report. Of course you dont believe it, because it crushes everything you believe in about Russia and its honest play while Putin arrests and kills political opponents.

[hater]

When I say I trust the report's conclusions, that's exactly what I mean. No collusion, Russia tried to interfere (not uncommon and probably not the only country), and obstruction of justice debatable.

:tu

[pgardn]

When I say I trust the report's conclusions, that's exactly what I mean. No collusion, Russia tried to interfere (not uncommon and probably not the only country), and obstruction of justice debatable.

Trump campaign advisors, family and Trump lied about contacts with Russian officials to federal investigators. We KNOW this. Its in the report.

[pgardn]

When I say I trust the report's conclusions, that's exactly what I mean. No collusion, Russia tried to interfere (not uncommon and probably not the only country), and obstruction of justice debatable.

The breadth of it and the fact that Russian WANTED US TO KNOW is highly uncommon.

[hater]

Its directly in the report.
And then more has been found outside of the report now after Russian non government groups are running a bit wild and doing things Putin does not want.

There is airtight evidence of RUSSIAN government hacking of everything I mentioned. The red team knows and believes this as well. But they certainly dont dwell on it because orange man still has influence.

Deny all you want RT man. Its right in the report. Of course you dont believe it, because it crushes everything you believe in about Russia and its honest play while Putin arrests and kills political opponents.

Read ElNonos post
You might learn something

[pgardn]

Read ElNonos post
You might learn something

I did.
Its very general.

Im giving you specifics FROM THE REPORT.
Read my stuff, you wont because you cant handle it as you are in love with Putin. You have a stake in this so you poke your eyes on purpose. Its very common with people like you and derp.

[pgardn]

Its directly in the report.
And then more has been found outside of the report now after Russian non government groups are running a bit wild and doing things Putin does not want.

There is airtight evidence of RUSSIAN government hacking of everything I mentioned. The red team knows and believes this as well. But they certainly dont dwell on it because orange man still has influence.

Deny all you want RT man. Its right in the report. Of course you dont believe it, because it crushes everything you believe in about Russia and its honest play while Putin arrests and kills political opponents.

The Russians threw this in our face you idiot.
They made zero efforts of cover, just lie to people like you who want to believe and it works.
Really a fantastic strategy taking advantage of a poorly educated democracy made of people like you.

[pgardn]

Too bad the truth in the report is not directly tied to Hater's stimulus check.

[hater]

Blah blah

Post the evidence, urine

I will gladly take a look. Post it

[ElNono]

Trump campaign advisors, family and Trump lied about contacts with Russian officials to federal investigators. We KNOW this. Its in the report.

The report notes this in the form of obstruction of justice. However, it also makes clear there was no evidence of collusion, and it's the most in-depth investigation we have on that case.


The breadth of it and the fact that Russian WANTED US TO KNOW is highly uncommon.

Where on the report it claims Russia wanted us to know? The report unearthed a number of previously unknown Russian operations, including phishing attempts.

[Ball Buster]

Evidence “very strong” for Russia’s hack of the DNC (https://www.dropbox.com/s/229h62us8vc1ujp/Screen%20Shot%202021-03-21%20at%202.49.28%20PM.png?dl=0), January 3, 2017. This story probably should have been #1 on this list, as one reader points out. The initial Intelligence Community Assessment (https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf) of Russian electoral interference, published in January of 2017, was unequivocal when it came to assigning blame for the hack of the Democratic National Committee, writing
[COLOR=#000000]
In July 2015, Russian intelligence gained access to Democratic National Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that access until at least June 2016.
Politicians and intelligence officials tended to use this same language for years (although Barack Obama used the term “not conclusive (https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/18/remarks-president-final-press-conference)” just before he left office). This is from an interview California congressman Adam Schiff gave to NPR (https://www.npr.org/2017/01/03/507984012/rep-adam-schiff-weighs-in-on-russian-hacking-evidence) just a few days before the release of the ICA:
SCHIFF: Well, the evidence is very, very strong, and I think this is the consensus of the Democrats and Republicans on the Intelligence Committees. You know, we view, obviously, a variety of intelligence, different sources, different methods of gathering it, and none of us have a question really about Russia's involvement in the hacking of our institutions and the dumping of data.
Years later, however, we learned that the company charged with doing this analysis had no such evidence. Shawn Henry of Crowdstrike, testifying (https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2020/05/sh21.pdf) in secret to congress, has this exchange with none other than Schiff, saying there was not “concrete evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC,” never mind by whom:

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:s teep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F e95ba952-41d3-4b87-8e1c-faf0fac4e23e_685x166.pngHenry went on to dump all over several sacred cows of Russia reporting, saying, “we just don’t have the evidence that says [data] actually left.” Utah congressman Chris Stewart appeared dumbfounded, asking Henry if the lack of concrete evidence covered the “emails that, you know, everyone is so knowledgeable of”:
(https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F e95ba952-41d3-4b87-8e1c-faf0fac4e23e_685x166.png)https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:s teep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F a167faf3-982e-49ff-816b-c1c287df772a_649x319.png (https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F a167faf3-982e-49ff-816b-c1c287df772a_649x319.png)

[Ball Buster]

Trump had“repeated contacts” with Russian intelligence, New York Times,February 14, 2017. Four “current and former American officials,” citing a “trove of information the FBI is sifting through,” said the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/us/politics/russia-intelligence-communications-trump.html).” Months later:

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:s teep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F e3ac9e9e-2269-4c88-9fa3-12fbdf1f2a36_814x294.png (https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F e3ac9e9e-2269-4c88-9fa3-12fbdf1f2a36_814x294.png)

[Spurs Homer]

The Mueller report was viciously circumscribed in what it could investigate the, eg, no finances.

Repugs "forgot" and lied about the Russian connections before and throughout the investigation,

then Barr BLATANTLY LIED in his 4-pager to trying to exonerate Trash.

Trash trusts Pootin, while trashing 17 US agencies, and has private face to face with Pootin and destroys Trash's translator's notes.

WAY too much SMOKE. Traitorous Trash, his mafiya, Repugs are guilty as hell of working with Pootin to undermine USA.

[Thread]

Too bad the truth in the report is not directly tied to Hater's stimulus check.

That's light $600 because mother fucker Biden lied, then picked President Trump's pocket for the $600. Then didn't even had the decency to explain his lie, just celebrated the two Georgia jerk offs wins. "I fooled 'em, Hussein, just like you taught me, bro. Now, let's hustle us some race, that'll distract 'em. tee, hee, Hussein, tee, hee."

That piece of shit couldn't even keep his word on the 2k. Was ALMOST worth it just to see mother fucker Biden grub like that. That pitiful old fart.