Sidney Powell's evidence

[Spurs Homer]

The kraken - FLIPS -


https://youtu.be/w5_VWUWg_SY?si=l4E7kLStQ1kvEAuK



Testifying against the cult traitor soon....6 years probation and if she does not deliver fat ass traitor on a heavy duty steel-reinforced platter - she goes to the Grey Bar Hotel!


:elephant
:elephant
:elephant
:elephant
:elephant
:elephant
:elephant
:elephant:elephant:elephant:elephant:elephant

[Splits]

they're going to have to drop the case against the Cheese. No purpose of a 5 month trial for some low level hack

[Winehole23]

they're going to have to drop the case against the Cheese. No purpose of a 5 month trial for some low level hack?

[Splits]

?

why waste 5 months on some nobody and at the same time give your case away? everything is on hold during the trial. drop the charges and get the rest of the criminals on a trial date ASAP

[Splits]

Sidney’s evidence in Yam Tits’ trial will be interesting. :tu

she's a terrible witness given that she's fucking nuts

[Thread]

why waste 5 months on some nobody and at the same time give your case away? everything is on hold during the trial. drop the charges and get the rest of the criminals on a trial date ASAP


Mornin', Splits.

Let us proceed...

[Winehole23]

I'm not an expert on this case, but what I've seen tends to refute Eastman and Trump's legal bona fides and support the idea that what they were really after was putting political pressure on Pence, Congress and the Supreme Court to stop the transfer of power to Biden.

[Thread]

support the idea that what they were really after was putting political pressure on Pence, Congress and the Supreme Court to stop the transfer of power to Biden.

Winester

[Spurs Homer]

they're going to have to drop the case against the Cheese. No purpose of a 5 month trial for some low level hack

Kracken took the plea deal the day before the start of picking the jury process...and got a great deal as long as she delivers the traitor...

cheese-bro needs to shit-or-get-off the shitter and either take a deal or stay on the titanic and spend years in prison and years ignored by trump anyway -

so easy choice - he will cop a plea and start singing really really soon...

[Thread]

Kracken took the plea deal the day before the start of picking the jury process...and got a great deal as long as she delivers the traitor...

cheese-bro needs to shit-or-get-off the shitter and either take a deal or stay on the titanic and spend years in prison and years ignored by trump anyway -

so easy choice - he will cop a plea and start singing really really soon...

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSW4T_9cMF-MB2P8Sh8BsoQF736lg9yj5g_ZjICFv4pEUtpn9YlpX6gEmAkmQ&s

[Winehole23]

why waste 5 months on some nobody and at the same time give your case away? everything is on hold during the trial. drop the charges and get the rest of the criminals on a trial date ASAPChesebro just failed to quash incriminating emails and docs, can't see why the DA would drop the case now, since it's likely to shore up the picture of the broader conspiracy.

[Thread]

Chesebro just failed to quash incriminating emails and docs, can't see why the DA would drop the case now, since it's likely to shore up the picture of the broader conspiracy.


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSW4T_9cMF-MB2P8Sh8BsoQF736lg9yj5g_ZjICFv4pEUtpn9YlpX6gEmAkmQ&s

[Ef-man]

she's a terrible witness given that she's fucking nuts

Sure, she is a nut case but she will support the prosecution’s case that there were many who coordinated and conspired with ringleader Yam Tits.

[Thread]

Sure, she is a nut case but she will support the prosecution’s case that there were many who coordinated and conspired with ringleader Yam Tits.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSW4T_9cMF-MB2P8Sh8BsoQF736lg9yj5g_ZjICFv4pEUtpn9YlpX6gEmAkmQ&s

[RandomGuy]

she's a terrible witness given that she's fucking nuts

She is. Not someone you really would put on the stand without a shit ton of hard corroborating evidence.

What is hilarious is that when trump said "That isn't my attorney" he took away TWO possible legal defenses.

One was "advice of counsel" where you can be held blameless if you are given bad legal advice, and the other was any kind of attorney client privilege to shield discussions from discovery.

LOL can't help himself, dude is imploding.

[Thread]

She is. Not someone you really would put on the stand without a shit ton of hard corroborating evidence.

What is hilarious is that when trump said "That isn't my attorney" he took away TWO possible legal defenses.

One was "advice of counsel" where you can be held blameless if you are given bad legal advice, and the other was any kind of attorney client privilege to shield discussions from discovery.

LOL can't help himself, dude is imploding.

It's explainable...you tried to blow him up, cut his head off and shoot him to death. "imploding?" Sure. But he did the wet work on your side yesterday, son. While you was all celebrating he shoved that Johnson down your throats & up your asses. And you know what, RG? You never saw it comin, doc.

[CosmicCowboy]

Interesting that none of the pleas charges include RICO. If it narrows down to everyone pleading except Trump, how can you have a RICO case of one defendant?

[Winehole23]

Interesting that none of the pleas charges include RICO. If it narrows down to everyone pleading except Trump, how can you have a RICO case of one defendant?All the predicates of a racketeering offense are themselves crimes, so the racketeering enhancement provides an incentive for lower level operatives to cooperate with the prosecution in exhange for reduced punishment. If the government charged all the members of the criminal conspiracy with racketeering, the crooks might tend to hang together instead.

The law is working as designed.

[clambake]

All the predicates of a racketeering offense are themselves crimes, so the racketeering enhancement provides an incentive for lower level operatives to cooperate with the prosecution in exhange for reduced punishment. If the government charged all the members of the criminal conspiracy with racketeering, the crooks might tend to hang together instead.

The law is working as designed.

He’s looking for an out.

[Thread]

Interesting that none of the pleas charges include RICO. If it narrows down to everyone pleading except Trump, how can you have a RICO case of one defendant?

(They'll) get it done, CC, stop walking the floors. After all, son, it's American Democracy.

[Thread]

All the predicates of a racketeering offense are themselves crimes, so the racketeering enhancement provides an incentive for lower level operatives to cooperate with the prosecution in exhange for reduced punishment. If the government charged all the members of the criminal conspiracy with racketeering, the crooks might tend to hang together instead.

The law is working as designed.

And has been since he set Hillary's top rung on that D.C. curb, just before midnight, Election Night..."Now, say good night."

[Thread]

He’s looking for an out.

You wish, kid. Never gonna happen. You're gonna have to frog march him up those 13 steps, onto the scaffolding & drop the trap door, buddy-boy.

Even then, clammy, like that Jew woman/engineer in -Shindler's List- lectures that Nazi officer when he pulls out his Luger to execute her..."That won't be enough."

[CosmicCowboy]

He’s looking for an out.

No I'm not. They could have as easily plead to the RICO charge with the same negotiated reduced sentence.

[Winehole23]

He’s looking for an out.sounds like semantic table pounding to me

[Thread]

No I'm not. They could have s easily plead to the RICO charge with the same negotiated reduced sentence.


You wish, kid. Never gonna happen. You're gonna have to frog march him up those 13 steps, onto the scaffolding & drop the trap door, buddy-boy.

Even then, CC, like that Jew woman/engineer in -Shindler's List- lectures that Nazi officer when he pulls out his Luger to execute her..."That won't be enough."

[Thread]

sounds like semantic table pounding to me

When you got American citizens trying to blow you up, cut your head off and shoot you to death, you'll pound a table, or, 2, Winester.

Let us proceed...

[Winehole23]

No I'm not. They could have as easily plead to the RICO charge with the same negotiated reduced sentence.The racketeering enhancement is treble damages, so it's a worse bargaining position for both sides. The crooks have most of the damaging information.

[Thread]

The racketeering enhancement is treble damages, so it's a worse bargaining position for both sides. The crooks have most of the damaging information.

Yes, the ones with the swords, bombs and guns who tried to cut his head off, bomb his new home and shoot him to death.

[Splits]

Interesting that none of the pleas charges include RICO. If it narrows down to everyone pleading except Trump, how can you have a RICO case of one defendant?

I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell they offer Rudy shit. And I'd seriously doubt Eastman and Meadows either. My guess is all 4 go to trial.

[CosmicCowboy]

I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell they offer Rudy shit. And I'd seriously doubt Eastman and Meadows either. My guess is all 4 go to trial.

You are probably right on that, especially Rudy.

[scott]

Rudy, and to some extent Trump, would probably love a plea deal that got them off easy... the problem is that they are the targets :lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell they offer Rudy shit. And I'd seriously doubt Eastman and Meadows either. My guess is all 4 go to trial.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/chief-staff-mark-meadows-granted-immunity-tells-special/story?id=104231281

Meadow already flipped for immunity. He's been saying that Trump was well aware fo what was going on and the consequences of his actions or lack thereof.

[Splits]

https://abcnews.go.com/US/chief-staff-mark-meadows-granted-immunity-tells-special/story?id=104231281

Meadow already flipped for immunity. He's been saying that Trump was well aware fo what was going on and the consequences of his actions or lack thereof.

That article has not been corroborated, was disputed by his lawyer, and has to do with the Jan 6 federal case not Georgia. There's also a lot of ways he can be forced to testify about a narrow range of topics by Jack without "flipping" or getting immunity from Fani

[ChumpDumper]

I can't see a scenario where Meadows hasn't flipped early and often.

[Splits]

I can, he's a snake, always walking up to the edge but not stepping over. And again, there's a difference between "flipping" (actually known as a cooperation agreement where you plead out for special treatment) and being forced to testify about specific topics by being given limited immunity. Nobody knows which side of the fence Meadow's is on, there has been no confirmed reporting on that, could be either.

[spurraider21]

https://abcnews.go.com/US/chief-staff-mark-meadows-granted-immunity-tells-special/story?id=104231281

Meadow already flipped for immunity. He's been saying that Trump was well aware fo what was going on and the consequences of his actions or lack thereof.
immunity for grand jury testimony can be fairly limited

use immunity just means that the govt agrees that the testimony that day you give to the grand jury cant be used to incriminate you

otoh, transactional immunity is when they agree ahead of time to give you immunity from prosecution for the offenses involved as long as you agree to give testimony about it

its quite likely that just for the purpose of grand jury testimony, they'd only offer the more limited "use immunity"

[FuzzyLumpkins]

That article has not been corroborated, was disputed by his lawyer, and has to do with the Jan 6 federal case not Georgia. There's also a lot of ways he can be forced to testify about a narrow range of topics by Jack without "flipping" or getting immunity from Fani

It is a 'sources' source but they are quoting Meadows in conversations and ABCnews has a pretty good record for integrity.

But yeah you are right. GA doesn't need Meadows. They have Trump on tape threatening the GA governor if he doesn't find the votes he wanted.

[ChumpDumper]

I can, he's a snake, always walking up to the edge but not stepping over. And again, there's a difference between "flipping" (actually known as a cooperation agreement where you plead out for special treatment) and being forced to testify about specific topics by being given limited immunity. Nobody knows which side of the fence Meadow's is on, there has been no confirmed reporting on that, could be either.

Yeah, thinking about it -- the guys nearer the top might just roll the dice on Trump's being POTUS again.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

immunity for grand jury testimony can be fairly limited

use immunity just means that the govt agrees that the testimony that day you give to the grand jury cant be used to incriminate you

otoh, transactional immunity is when they agree ahead of time to give you immunity from prosecution for the offenses involved as long as you agree to give testimony about it

its quite likely that just for the purpose of grand jury testimony, they'd only offer the more limited "use immunity"

How would it be in Meadows interest to agree to that version?

[spurraider21]

How would it be in Meadows interest to agree to that version?
i dont think the full transactional immunity even exists on a federal level. some states allow it, and usually only in most compelling circumstances.

its not even a question of accepting the offer. the government simply grants use immunity and that can allow them to compel grand jury testimony. it basically acts as though you have exercised your 5th amendment priivlege to not self incriminate, since none of what you say can be used against you. in addition to your statements alone, any info that they later learn as a result of your statements can also not be used against you

so basically, meadows wouldnt have to accept a deal. government basically says you have immunity and therefore must testify before grand jury.

a better indication of flipping would be a plea deal

[scott]

i dont think the full transactional immunity even exists on a federal level. some states allow it, and usually only in most compelling circumstances.

its not even a question of accepting the offer. the government simply grants use immunity and that can allow them to compel grand jury testimony. it basically acts as though you have exercised your 5th amendment priivlege to not self incriminate, since none of what you say can be used against you. in addition to your statements alone, any info that they later learn as a result of your statements can also not be used against you

so basically, meadows wouldnt have to accept a deal. government basically says you have immunity and therefore must testify before grand jury.

a better indication of flipping would be a plea deal

In the case of Use Immunity, I take that you are still liable for any perjury you may commit while testifying? As in, the Immunity is only from prosecution of the acts described in the testimony, but you are not immune from prosecution for any crimes committed WHILE testifying?

[spurraider21]

In the case of Use Immunity, I take that you are still liable for any perjury you may commit while testifying? As in, the Immunity is only from prosecution of the acts described in the testimony, but you are not immune from prosecution for any crimes committed WHILE testifying?
yes, you can still get busted for perjury. just not the underlying conduct you are testifying about

or if they find incriminating evidence independent of your testimony and not found solely as a result of your testimony

[Splits]

i dont think the full transactional immunity even exists on a federal level. some states allow it, and usually only in most compelling circumstances.

its not even a question of accepting the offer. the government simply grants use immunity and that can allow them to compel grand jury testimony. it basically acts as though you have exercised your 5th amendment priivlege to not self incriminate, since none of what you say can be used against you. in addition to your statements alone, any info that they later learn as a result of your statements can also not be used against you

so basically, meadows wouldnt have to accept a deal. government basically says you have immunity and therefore must testify before grand jury.

a better indication of flipping would be a plea deal

My understanding, not being board certified as you are so I could get part of this wrong, is that there's an additional complication in Meadows' case because of multiple jurisdictions. So if Jack grants use immunity, where he isn't even indicted (unless it is under seal), but Fani doesn't grant immunity, where he is indicted, then any testimony to the Fed grand jury could actually be used against him in Fulton Co.

I also think the cooperation agreements work differently in the jurisdictions. In the Ellis case in Georgia for example, she plead AND got sentenced to probation in exchange for her cooperation. At the Federal level, they'll offer reduced charges but won't recommend sentencing until after your cooperation is complete. So it compels the defendant to be as helpful as possible to get as much leniency as you can.

[spurraider21]

My understanding, not being board certified as you are so I could get part of this wrong, is that there's an additional complication in Meadows' case because of multiple jurisdictions. So if Jack grants use immunity, where he isn't even indicted (unless it is under seal), but Fani doesn't grant immunity, where he is indicted, then any testimony to the Fed grand jury could actually be used against him in Fulton Co.

I also think the cooperation agreements work differently in the jurisdictions. In the Ellis case in Georgia for example, she plead AND got sentenced to probation in exchange for her cooperation. At the Federal level, they'll offer reduced charges but won't recommend sentencing until after your cooperation is complete. So it compels the defendant to be as helpful as possible to get as much leniency as you can.
yeah, i dont really practice crim law, let alone federal (we've worked one state crim case only), so im not an expert on the subject. i can just generally speak to the different types of immunity and why those arent necessarily indicative of flipping

but im not sure fani would have access to federal grand jury testimony anyway. i know fed attorneys can basically share grand jury stuff, but there are limited circumstances where they can disclose any of it to states attorneys

got nothing to do with being an attorney. anybody can look up the federal rules of crim pro and be more brushed up on it than me

[benefactor]

Rudy, and to some extent Trump, would probably love a plea deal that got them off easy... the problem is that they are the targets :lol
Trump will never, ever take a plea deal, even if it gets him off easy. How he looks to his base is way too important to him.

[scott]

Trump will never, ever take a plea deal, even if it gets him off easy. How he looks to his base is way too important to him.

While it is certainly debatable, I think this is only true because he is holding out hope for winning the election and thus getting off on all fed charges and setting up a constitutional crisis re: state crimes.

If not for that, Trump would definitely take a plea deal to stay out of prison. He’s a selfish coward above all else.

[benefactor]

While it is certainly debatable, I think this is only true because he is holding out hope for winning the election and thus getting off on all fed charges and setting up a constitutional crisis re: state crimes.

If not for that, Trump would definitely take a plea deal to stay out of prison. He’s a selfish coward above all else.
Oh I agree with that...I was working from the angle that he won't while being a presidential candidate. If that wasn't a thing I think he most definitely would. In the end Trump is only about saving his own ass. When he leaves politics he will still grift people for money via his MAGA fame but that won't matter nearly as much as keeping himself intact as a franchise.

[CosmicCowboy]

i dont think the full transactional immunity even exists on a federal level. some states allow it, and usually only in most compelling circumstances.

its not even a question of accepting the offer. the government simply grants use immunity and that can allow them to compel grand jury testimony. it basically acts as though you have exercised your 5th amendment priivlege to not self incriminate, since none of what you say can be used against you. in addition to your statements alone, any info that they later learn as a result of your statements can also not be used against you

so basically, meadows wouldnt have to accept a deal. government basically says you have immunity and therefore must testify before grand jury.

a better indication of flipping would be a plea deal

Feds must give transactional immunity occasionally considering they have the ability to give witnesses new identities and put them in witness protection.

[Thread]

Trump will never, ever take a plea deal, even if it gets him off easy. How he looks to his base is way too important to him.

bene-boy

[Thread]

While it is certainly debatable, I think this is only true because he is holding out hope for winning the election and thus getting off on all fed charges and setting up a constitutional crisis re: state crimes.

If not for that, Trump would definitely take a plea deal to stay out of prison. He’s a selfish coward above all else.

You want to see him crawl. Uh, uh. Nope, scott. You tried to blow him up. You tried to cut his head off. You tried to shoot him to death multiple times. & now you're subjecting him to the agony of crucifixion.

You fucks, you dirty rotten fucks.

He's livin' still.

[Thread]

Oh I agree with that...I was working from the angle that he won't while being a presidential candidate. If that wasn't a thing I think he most definitely would. In the end Trump is only about saving his own ass. When he leaves politics he will still grift people for money via his MAGA fame but that won't matter nearly as much as keeping himself intact as a franchise.


You want to see him crawl. Uh, uh. Nope, bene. You tried to blow him up. You tried to cut his head off. You tried to shoot him to death multiple times. & now you're subjecting him to the agony of crucifixion.

You fucks, you dirty rotten fucks.

He's livin' still.

[spurraider21]

Feds must give transactional immunity occasionally considering they have the ability to give witnesses new identities and put them in witness protection.
people in witsec usually still serve prison sentences. fed prisons have separate areas away from gen pop that is used for people under particular danger, including witsec inmates

their family may meanwhile be relocated and they connect them after sentence is up

witsec is voluntary on behalf of the witness. basically they agree to the plea deal including a reduced sentence (as we've seen, sometimes that means no prison). the plea deal cannot include any promises of witsec unelss separately authorized by the witsec program. when witsec determines this case of worthy of protection, the witness decides if he wants to go through that or not. if they accept, then the protection starts basically immediately including thru the prison sentence

[Thread]

people in witsec usually still serve prison sentences. fed prisons have separate areas away from gen pop that is used for people under particular danger, including witsec inmates

their family may meanwhile be relocated and they connect them after sentence is up

witsec is voluntary on behalf of the witness. basically they agree to the plea deal including a reduced sentence (as we've seen, sometimes that means no prison). the plea deal cannot include any promises of witsec unelss separately authorized by the witsec program. when witsec determines this case of worthy of protection, the witness decides if he wants to go through that or not. if they accept, then the protection starts basically immediately including thru the prison sentence

21, sweetheart, puddin'head, that ain't Trump. They'll be nary deal. Nary You're gonna have to put him in a prison cell in the uniform of that prison and in front of the world.

C'mon, 21, chop/chop.

[RandomGuy]

Trump will never, ever take a plea deal, even if it gets him off easy. How he looks to his base is way too important to him.

He is a coward. My guess is that he will take the deal if it benefits him, and will spin it on the backside, as he always does.

[Thread]

He is a coward. My guess is that he will take the deal if it benefits him, and will spin it on the backside, as he always does.


RG, sweetheart, puddin'head, that ain't Trump. They'll be nary deal. Nary You're gonna have to put him in a prison cell in the uniform of that prison and in front of the world.

C'mon, RG, chop/chop.

[Ef-man]

And the final nail in the coffin. Out with a whimper. :lmao

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revisit sanctions levied against two pro-Trump attorneys who filed frivolous lawsuits challenging the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood filed separate appeals asking the justices to review sanctions imposed by a US district court in 2021. Though their cases involved several technical arguments, both claimed sanctions would make it less likely for lawyers to take “unpopular” cases to court.

The Supreme Court denied both appeals without offering any comment on the case.

[Thread]

And the final nail in the coffin. Out with a whimper. :lmao

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revisit sanctions levied against two pro-Trump attorneys who filed frivolous lawsuits challenging the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood filed separate appeals asking the justices to review sanctions imposed by a US district court in 2021. Though their cases involved several technical arguments, both claimed sanctions would make it less likely for lawyers to take “unpopular” cases to court.

The Supreme Court denied both appeals without offering any comment on the case.

That's what happens when you make President by storming the gate.

tee, hee.

[Ef-man]

And the final nail in the coffin. Out with a whimper. :lmao

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to revisit sanctions levied against two pro-Trump attorneys who filed frivolous lawsuits challenging the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood filed separate appeals asking the justices to review sanctions imposed by a US district court in 2021. Though their cases involved several technical arguments, both claimed sanctions would make it less likely for lawyers to take “unpopular” cases to court.

The Supreme Court denied both appeals without offering any comment on the case.

A two-fer castration, a buy one get one free deal from the SC, nice.

A kraken and a super-lawyer belonging to Yam Tits! :lol

[Thread]

A two-fer castration, a buy one get one free deal from the SC, nice.

A kraken and a super-lawyer belonging to Yam Tits! :lol


That's what happens when you make President by storming the gate.

tee, hee.

[Ef-man]

https://i.redd.it/j48p4htz1lp61.jpg

[spurraider21]

:lmao requested default judgment against herself

translation here is that kari lake is effectively capitulating that she is indeed liable for defamation. is seeking a jury trial just as it relates to the damages

1772718897499611178

[scott]

:lmao requested default judgment against herself

translation here is that kari lake is effectively capitulating that she is indeed liable for defamation. is seeking a jury trial just as it relates to the damages

1772718897499611178

Can't afford the legal bills and the damages.

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GNx5G4AXAAEUHe-?format=jpg&name=large


Powell, an attorney who has filed numerous lawsuits in a failed bid to overturn former President Donald Trump (https://www.newsweek.com/topic/donald-trump)'s 2020 election loss, made the comments during an appearance on the conservative Stew Peters Show on Friday.

She said that as a pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol that day, her team was seeking an emergency injunction to prevent the certification of Biden's win.


"We were filing a 12th Amendment constitutional challenge to the process that the Congress was about to use under the Electoral Act provisions that simply don't jive with the 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution," she said. "And Justice Alito was our circuit justice for that."



She added: "Louie Gohmert was the plaintiff in our lawsuit, and we were suing the vice president to follow the 12th Amendment as opposed to the Electoral College Act."





Powell claimed that when Pelosi learned of the lawsuit, she hurriedly reconvened Congress to certify Biden's victory shortly after the attack on the Capitol.


"She got notice when we made our filing because she wanted to file an amicus brief," Powell said. "And everything broke loose and she really had to speed up reconvening Congress to get the vote going before Justice Alito might have issued an injunction to stop it all, which is what should have happened."

https://www.newsweek.com/sidney-powell-drags-justice-samuel-alito-supreme-court-january-6-mess-1632896

[Thread]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GNx5G4AXAAEUHe-?format=jpg&name=large




https://www.newsweek.com/sidney-powell-drags-justice-samuel-alito-supreme-court-january-6-mess-1632896

Good. Whatever it takes.