** Official Tuesday April 4, 2023 Elections Thread **

[Millennial_Messiah]

Chicago Mayor.

Wisconsin supreme court.

Could be a harbinger of what's to come in 2024, especially in the rust belt.

Go Judge Kelly and (blue dog democrat) Paul Vallas.

[spurraider21]

lib dominating per par

[Trainwreck2100]

Lol Rs lost another gerrymander

[ChumpDumper]

Today's fragile white Republican male:

1643444787155025925

[Spurs Homer]

Wisconsin ftw

[ElNono]

Today's fragile white Republican male:

1643444787155025925

lulz those tears... conservatards hating democracy per par

[Will Hunting]

Good riddance Scott Walker machine.

can’t wait for justice Janet to redraw the maps and rule right to work laws unconstitutional.

[Will Hunting]

:lol the new lib majority is ready to cook

1643452891049627650

[Millennial_Messiah]

Good riddance Scott Walker machine.

can’t wait for justice Janet to redraw the maps and rule right to work laws unconstitutional.

right to work law I agree with, pro choice being the law I agree with, but I don't think just having a 4-3 court majority and governor Evers with the state legislature and the state senate being solid R majority will be enough to gerrymander a state that has bad geography for Democrats having the vast majority of the democrat voting population centered in two metros, neither of which are big enough to justify cracking or having two districts for.

You have to crack Dane County in an ugly way to get a third blue district. Cracking Milwaukee to include large portions of the WOW would be the other option but it would be stupid because it would outright piss those (R) voters off and in a bad year those two seats could both end up going red, and in any case cracking a big city that's less than the size of a district is stupid. Milwaukee county being surrounded by red counties adds to the Dems' geographic problem.

The problem for Wisconsin Dems is the (D) voters outside of Milwaukee and Madison are scattered throughout the state but not a majority in any specific location that's decently sized enough to make a whole congressional district.

[Will Hunting]

right to work law I agree with, pro choice being the law I agree with, but I don't think just having a 4-3 court majority and governor Evers with the state legislature and the state senate being solid R majority will be enough to gerrymander a state that has bad geography for Democrats having the vast majority of the democrat voting population centered in two metros, neither of which are big enough to justify cracking or having two districts for.

You have to crack Dane County in an ugly way to get a third blue district. Cracking Milwaukee to include large portions of the WOW would be the other option but it would be stupid because it would outright piss those (R) voters off and in a bad year those two seats could both end up going red, and in any case cracking a big city that's less than the size of a district is stupid. Milwaukee county being surrounded by red counties adds to the Dems' geographic problem.

The problem for Wisconsin Dems is the (D) voters outside of Milwaukee and Madison are scattered throughout the state but not a majority in any specific location that's decently sized enough to make a whole congressional district.
I fully understand all of this, I think you’re the one who doesn’t understand what’s going on.

The Dems don’t need to hold the state leg for justice Janet to rule that Scott Walker’s right to work law is unconstitutional :lmao

[pgardn]

Today's fragile white Republican male:

1643444787155025925

another fkn hypocrite...
Its just total retardation the red team keeps putting out these obsessive compulsive liars

After losing the 2020 Wisconsin Supreme Court election, Kelly joined a conservative nonprofit, the Institute for Reforming Government, as a senior fellow in constitutional governance.[23] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kelly_(Wisconsin_judge)#cite_note-23) While there, he was the author of the "Lawmaker's Manual for Executive Oversight," a guide for Wisconsin legislators to use their investigatory committee powers to hold executive branch officials accountable.[24] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kelly_(Wisconsin_judge)#cite_note-24)
Since leaving the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Kelly has been vocal in his criticism of his former colleague, conservative justice Brian Hagedorn (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Hagedorn), for breaking with the court's conservative majority on several decisions. Kelly accused Hagedorn of considering the political implications of his rulings instead of "following what the law says."[25] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kelly_(Wisconsin_judge)#cite_note-25)
Involvement in Stop the Steal movement[edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Kelly_(Wisconsin_judge)&action=edit&section=9&editintro=Template:BLP_editintro)]Kelly was paid $120,000 by the Wisconsin State Republican Party and the Republican National Committee (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_National_Committee) as an attorney who worked on election issues in 2020 after his term with the Wisconsin Supreme Court ended.[26] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kelly_(Wisconsin_judge)#cite_note-26) In the weeks following the 2020 presidential election (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election), he provided legal counsel to the Wisconsin GOP to overturn the 2020 election.[27] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kelly_(Wisconsin_judge)#cite_note-27) Former Wisconsin Republican Party Chairman Andrew Hitt said in a deposition that he and Kelly had "pretty extensive conversations" about the illegal fake elector scheme in Wisconsin that was one of the well-known attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempts_to_overturn_the_2020_United_States_presid ential_election).