Reply With Quote
lib dominating per par
Chicago Mayor.
Wisconsin supreme court.
Could be a harbinger of what's to come in 2024, especially in the rust belt.
Go Judge Kelly and (blue dog democrat) Paul Vallas.
lib dominating per par
Lol Rs lost another gerrymander
Today's fragile white Republican male:
Wisconsin ftw
lulz those tears... conserva s hating democracy per par
Good riddance Scott Walker machine.
can’t wait for justice Janet to redraw the maps and rule right to work laws uncons utional.
the new lib majority is ready to cook
right to work law I agree with, pro choice being the law I agree with, but I don't think just having a 4-3 court majority and governor Evers with the state legislature and the state senate being solid R majority will be enough to gerrymander a state that has bad geography for Democrats having the vast majority of the democrat voting population centered in two metros, neither of which are big enough to justify cracking or having two districts for.
You have to crack Dane County in an ugly way to get a third blue district. Cracking Milwaukee to include large portions of the WOW would be the other option but it would be stupid because it would outright piss those (R) voters off and in a bad year those two seats could both end up going red, and in any case cracking a big city that's less than the size of a district is stupid. Milwaukee county being surrounded by red counties adds to the Dems' geographic problem.
The problem for Wisconsin Dems is the (D) voters outside of Milwaukee and Madison are scattered throughout the state but not a majority in any specific location that's decently sized enough to make a whole congressional district.
I fully understand all of this, I think you’re the one who doesn’t understand what’s going on.
The Dems don’t need to hold the state leg for justice Janet to rule that Scott Walker’s right to work law is uncons utional
another fkn hypocrite...
Its just total re ation the red team keeps putting out these obsessive compulsive liars
After losing the 2020 Wisconsin Supreme Court election, Kelly joined a conservative nonprofit, the Ins ute for Reforming Government, as a senior fellow in cons utional governance.[23] While there, he was the author of the "Lawmaker's Manual for Executive Oversight," a guide for Wisconsin legislators to use their investigatory committee powers to hold executive branch officials accountable.[24]
Since leaving the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Kelly has been vocal in his criticism of his former colleague, conservative justice Brian Hagedorn, for breaking with the court's conservative majority on several decisions. Kelly accused Hagedorn of considering the political implications of his rulings instead of "following what the law says."[25]
Involvement in Stop the Steal movement[edit]
Kelly was paid $120,000 by the Wisconsin State Republican Party and the Republican National Committee as an attorney who worked on election issues in 2020 after his term with the Wisconsin Supreme Court ended.[26] In the weeks following the 2020 presidential election, he provided legal counsel to the Wisconsin GOP to overturn the 2020 election.[27] Former Wisconsin Republican Party Chairman Andrew Hitt said in a deposition that he and Kelly had "pretty extensive conversations" about the illegal fake elector scheme in Wisconsin that was one of the well-known attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
