PDA

View Full Version : Ohio Set To Count Provisional Ballots



Nbadan
11-09-2004, 01:03 PM
Ohio Is Set to Reckon With Outstanding Ballots

Experts and Kerry campaign officials agree provisional and overseas absentee votes won't change outcome, but the count draws scrutiny.
By Ralph Vartabedian and Henry Weinstein
Times Staff Writers

November 9, 2004


<snip>Nonetheless despite it being unlikely state winner will change), the Ohio count is attracting scrutiny by groups who say the election was tainted and that voting equipment in Ohio, Florida, South Carolina and elsewhere was defective. On Friday, three congressional Democrats asked for a federal investigation.

Since the election, Internet sites and political blogs have buzzed with speculation that the vote was manipulated. "Evidence mounts that the vote may have been hacked," reads the title of one widely circulated Web offering.<snip>

If 10% of the provisional ballots were rejected, Kerry would need to get 97.6% of those remaining to overcome Bush's lead.<snip>

Counting of the provisional ballots is expected to begin Saturday, although state law allows counties to delay the canvass until Nov. 18, said James Lee, Secretary of State spokesman. Ohio, however, faces a Dec. 7 deadline to finish this process so that its electors can cast their electoral college votes Dec. 13.<snip>

Based on reports that Dill's organization — Verified Voting.org — has received, one precinct in Youngstown, Ohio, recorded a negative 25 million votes, which was discarded from official results. And it was widely reported after Nov. 2 that a North Carolina precinct lost 4,000 votes when a recording device used up all its memory but voters continued to cast ballots on the machine.

LA Times (http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-ohio9nov09,1,5782472.story?coll=la-news-a_section)

So, when does the official investigation for this get started?

http://home.comcast.net/~hugh.moore/HardballChrisMatthewsDecision2004_LINES_1.jpg

DE FULL MANTE
11-09-2004, 01:04 PM
MANTE

samikeyp
11-09-2004, 01:06 PM
Experts and Kerry campaign officials agree provisional and overseas absentee votes won't change outcome

dcole50
11-09-2004, 01:07 PM
It’s irrelevant now. If there is some big conspiracy uncovered (which isn’t going to happen), what will it accomplish? Will things truly be different in the next election (again, making the ridiculous assumptiont that there is some mastermind conspiracy behind this) ... will it change anything?

samikeyp
11-09-2004, 01:08 PM
Exactly.

Yonivore
11-09-2004, 01:22 PM
If I'm not mistaken and, please, please, correct me if I'm wrong, but, didn't Senator John Forbes Kerry stand before the nation on November 3, 2004 and concede the election to President Bush?

gophergeorge
11-09-2004, 01:25 PM
If I'm not mistaken and, please, please, correct me if I'm wrong, but, didn't Senator John Forbes Kerry stand before the nation on November 3, 2004 and concede the election to President Bush?


I conceded the election before I didn't concede the election...

bigzak25
11-09-2004, 01:28 PM
Bunch of fucking DIVIDERS and hypocrites these libs are.....

Yonivore
11-09-2004, 01:29 PM
I conceded the election before I didn't concede the election...
Yeah, I guess that's always a possibility...

samikeyp
11-09-2004, 01:43 PM
Yoni, you didn't hear the "just kidding" at the end?

MannyIsGod
11-09-2004, 02:05 PM
Fuck that, what is so dividing about making sure all the votes are counted? Godamn stop painting liberals with a wide brush just because Dan and Susan Surranden can't let the fucking thing go.

WE KNOW YOU WON BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN'T FIX THE FLAWS IN THE ELECTION PROCESS.

Nbadan
11-09-2004, 02:10 PM
Kerry has until mid-December to take back his concession. The important thing in Ohio isn't to overtake W's total, there simply aren't enough provisional ballots to do that, but to get close enough to trigger a automatic recount which the Republicans are sure to resist because they committed fraud. Plain and simple.

MannyIsGod
11-09-2004, 02:13 PM
I do think it's funny that the conservatives in here get all riled up though. What do you have to hide?

CrazyOne
11-09-2004, 02:51 PM
I'm not riled up... I'm highly amused... :rollin

samikeyp
11-09-2004, 02:54 PM
I am with you Manny. That is why I posted in a different thread about investigating this. I am all for totally revamping the way we run elections. I would also like to see the electoral college done away with.

Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:07 PM
I don't think anyone's seen me suggest they should stop counting...

It's just the "Demoncratic desperate" that seem to think some magic is going to reverse the outcome...

Count 'em, count 'em all!

samikeyp
11-09-2004, 04:19 PM
My wife, who is about as pro-democrat as you can get, even said this last night... "There are votes still to be counted...they are mostly for Bush, but they still need to be counted."

JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 04:21 PM
Every votes counts regardless of who the vote is for.

Bring 'em on!

bigzak25
11-09-2004, 04:23 PM
count them all. recount them all. still short? blame a bush conspiracy.

Marcus Bryant
11-09-2004, 04:24 PM
The poor bastard's lame joke continues.

Nbadan
11-09-2004, 04:28 PM
Oh look, Marcus is back to share his lack of wisdom with us. How pathetic.

Useruser666
11-09-2004, 04:33 PM
Kerry has until mid-December to take back his concession. The important thing in Ohio isn't to overtake W's total, there simply aren't enough provisional ballots to do that, but to get close enough to trigger a automatic recount which the Republicans are sure to resist because they committed fraud. Plain and simple.

Dan, prove any of what you just said. Prove they commited fraud. Prove it, plain and simple.

Marcus Bryant
11-09-2004, 04:36 PM
Awww, is danny boy mad?

Nbadan
11-09-2004, 04:44 PM
It's not up to me to prove it, the proof is already out there. It's up to all of us to demand that the House and Senate look into any role that Optical scanned votes owned by Diebold and ES&S could have played in the manipulation of our election. It's up to all of us to demand that the corporate press quit ignoring this issue, and find out why there were more votes casts than registered voters in two of the most important swing states of this election. It is up to all of us to demand an investigation as to why E-voting machines in Texas, Ohio and other states repeaditly counted votes for John Kerry as votes for Bush. It's up to all of us to demand to know why it took democrats sometimes 9 hours to vote on older machines more likely to produce a 'bad vote' while Republican voters got newer machines and nerely had to wait over an hour. It's up to all of us to wake up. Wake the fuck up!

Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:45 PM
Kerry has until mid-December to take back his concession. The important thing in Ohio isn't to overtake W's total, there simply aren't enough provisional ballots to do that, but to get close enough to trigger a automatic recount which the Republicans are sure to resist because they committed fraud. Plain and simple.
Yeah, like the states are going to change the certifications and pull the slates of electors that are already assembled to cast their votes if Kerry pulls a delayed "Gore" and takes it back.

You have no concept of the damage that'd do to your Party, do you Nbadanallah?

JoeChalupa
11-09-2004, 04:47 PM
How 'bout them Buckeyes!!

Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:52 PM
How 'bout them Buckeyes!!
:lmao

Yonivore
11-09-2004, 04:54 PM
It's not up to me to prove it, the proof is already out there. It's up to all of us to demand that the House and Senate look into any role that Optical scanned votes owned by Diebold and ES&S could have played in the manipulation of our election. It's up to all of us to demand that the corporate press quit ignoring this issue, and find out why there were more votes casts than registered voters in two of the most important swing states of this election. It is up to all of us to demand an investigation as to why E-voting machines in Texas, Ohio and other states repeaditly counted votes for John Kerry as votes for Bush. It's up to all of us to demand to know why it took democrats sometimes 9 hours to vote on older machines more likely to produce a 'bad vote' while Republican voters got newer machines and nerely had to wait over an hour. It's up to all of us to wake up. Wake the fuck up!
No, really, 51% of us are satisfied with the outcome...

You, go ahead and investigate all you want.

Useruser666
11-09-2004, 05:07 PM
I asked you for proof and you haven't given it. I am satisfied with the election. I hear no reports of LARGE numbers of fraud or invalid votes. Dan, stop your ranting for one second and look around. I say go ahead and recount every damn vote everywhere. It doesn't matter, Bush won! He won by more votes then there are ones beng disputed. If all these machines are so faulty then why were they allowed to be used in the first place? Can you ever let this go? I don't think you're capable of rational thought on this subject. You seem blinded by hate or some other force unknown to the rest of us here. You are a bull dog on the mailman's ass. Let go, he's already back at the post office.

NeoConIV
11-09-2004, 05:36 PM
You are a bull dog on the mailmain's ass. Let go, he's already back at the post office.

:lol :lol