PDA

View Full Version : Golden State vs Cleveland in OT



Kori Ellis
01-21-2007, 01:06 AM
In regulation ...

LeBron 27p, 7r, 5a, 8to

SJax 28p, 5r, 4a, 6to -- but hey, he got those to back with 5 steals :fro

T Park
01-21-2007, 01:14 AM
Warriors got the ball with 7.6


Lebron fumbled it off his foot :lol

Trade Barry and whatever to get Stephen Jackson back for gods sake.

They are replaying game 6 of the Finals with Jack in it...


But he was worthless according to guys like Mr Body :rolleyes

T Park
01-21-2007, 01:18 AM
Jack misses the game winning 3.

29 points on the night.

ace3g
01-21-2007, 01:19 AM
jackson couldnt hit a jumper to tie the game and send it to a 2nd overtime

v2freak
01-21-2007, 01:21 AM
I'm rooting for the Warriors

ducks
01-21-2007, 09:07 AM
poor james is a t.o machine

MI21
01-21-2007, 09:42 AM
:(

Ed Helicopter Jones
01-21-2007, 01:32 PM
Finley for Jax. Nelson would probably like to have his star player back.

Aggie Hoopsfan
01-21-2007, 01:43 PM
SJax 28p, 5r, 4a, 6to -- but hey, he got those to back with 5 steals

This stat line brought to you by the 2008 Holting Pattern. :pctoss

Mr. Body
01-21-2007, 01:55 PM
Jackson might have found the single place his grousin' and chuckin' ways will work. In Golden State he can shoot all he wants, turn the ball over all he wants, not play defense, and not worry about winning.

And chuckleheads will repeat the same J.R. Smith type arguments, failing to understand a stat line.

T Park
01-21-2007, 01:56 PM
Yeah 28 points 5 boards and 5 steals suck.

Right Body :rolleyes

Mr. Body
01-21-2007, 01:58 PM
They don't suck, but you're not getting what I'm saying.

Anyway, let's wait until the bloom is off the wine. Indiana loved him at first, too.

T Park
01-21-2007, 01:59 PM
Yeah you just keep clutching to your Brent Barry jersey.

Mr. Body
01-21-2007, 02:02 PM
Yeah you just keep clutching to your Brent Barry jersey.

What does this mean? :lol

Uh... go ahead and clutch your Stephen Jackson sweaty, used jock!

There, we're even or something.

boutons_
01-21-2007, 02:19 PM
If Brent played 49 minutes, and took 25 shots @40%, he could have a rare night like SJax did last night.

Sjax shot 40% FG vs Cavs, but a career 42%
( so he was off last night )

Sjax shot 50% 3G vs Cavs, but a carreer 3G of of piss poor 34%
( he was +16% last night. He would be the 5th best 3G shooter on the Spurs)

He's 6'8", but his career RB is 3.6! :lol,
1.33 STL,
AST/TO of 1.04 ( iow, he TOs as much as he ASTs, it's a wash).


SJax is nothing but a no-hustle, poor shooting, inefficient scorer who brings nothing else.

T Park
01-21-2007, 02:25 PM
SJax is nothing but a no-hustle, poor shooting, inefficient scorer who brings nothing else.

Yeah the 03 playoffs showed that no question :rolleyes

td4mvp21
01-21-2007, 02:27 PM
SJax is better than any forward besides Duncan that we have now and he knows the system too.

Bob Lanier
01-21-2007, 02:33 PM
TPark could score 30 on LeBron James.


SJax is nothing but a no-hustle, poor shooting, inefficient scorer who brings nothing else.
:tu

nkdlunch
01-21-2007, 02:34 PM
SJAx is a has been. next topic.

NuGGeTs-FaN
01-21-2007, 03:08 PM
Jackson might have found the single place his grousin' and chuckin' ways will work. In Golden State he can shoot all he wants, turn the ball over all he wants, not play defense, and not worry about winning.

And chuckleheads will repeat the same J.R. Smith type arguments, failing to understand a stat line.


JR last night - 24pts (9/14 shooting, including 6/9 from 3), a few boards, a steal, a block and only 2 to's.

Did i mention he is playing very good D at the moment?

objective
01-21-2007, 03:17 PM
Yeah the 03 playoffs showed that no question

indeed. Going back just to the 4th quarters of the close out games, in every one except 6 against the Lakers, Jackson hit HUGE shots and made big plays, such as actually making some nice assists.

2003.

Back when the Spurs had an awesome 3 man PF/C rotation and an awesome 3 man SF/SG rotation.

2003: PF/C had a starter at center who's a good rebounder and great shotblocker with a bench PF who was a great hustle player and good rebounder, scorer, and versatile defender.

2007: No starting center capable of either rebounding or shotblocking. No bench big who can score in the post, guard anyone that isn't also a big man, or grab a board.

2003: Bowen/Jackson/Manu were the triumverate top notch, they all fit well together, often with Jackson and Manu finishing games.

2007: Bowen/Manu/Steve Smith part II/Steve Smith part III. Bowen and Manu undermined by back-ups who when they don't nail shots can't do anything else to make up for it, like play defense, rebound, etc.

Aggie Hoopsfan
01-21-2007, 03:25 PM
Jackson might have found the single place his grousin' and chuckin' ways will work. In Golden State he can shoot all he wants, turn the ball over all he wants, not play defense, and not worry about winning.

And chuckleheads will repeat the same J.R. Smith type arguments, failing to understand a stat line.

Mr. Body, you should go post in the Club. It's clear you're clueless about basketball.

Aggie Hoopsfan
01-21-2007, 03:26 PM
If Brent played 49 minutes, and took 25 shots @40%, he could have a rare night like SJax did last night.

Sjax shot 40% FG vs Cavs, but a career 42%
( so he was off last night )

Sjax shot 50% 3G vs Cavs, but a carreer 3G of of piss poor 34%
( he was +16% last night. He would be the 5th best 3G shooter on the Spurs)

He's 6'8", but his career RB is 3.6! :lol,
1.33 STL,
AST/TO of 1.04 ( iow, he TOs as much as he ASTs, it's a wash).


SJax is nothing but a no-hustle, poor shooting, inefficient scorer who brings nothing else.

:lol Proof boutons can be a moron on whatever forum he posts on.

That no-hustle, poor shooting, inefficient scorer who brings nothing else to the table brought us the clutch shooting that resulted in a 2003 world championship.

Good call there croutons.

Bob Lanier
01-21-2007, 03:31 PM
Bill Russell also was once a good basketball player.

Usually people who live in the past aren't this bitter.

Mr. Body
01-21-2007, 03:55 PM
Mr. Body, you should go post in the Club. It's clear you're clueless about basketball.

Suck my dick, cocksucking, George Bush-loving nancy boy. Etc.

VaSpursFan
01-21-2007, 04:10 PM
In regulation ...

LeBron 27p, 7r, 5a, 8to

SJax 28p, 5r, 4a, 6to -- but hey, he got those to back with 5 steals :fro

i watched that game on league pass. Jax was all over the place. Nellies wide open system will enable him to have more games like this.

GS has a nice team for Nellie ball

Mr. Body
01-21-2007, 04:18 PM
i watched that game on league pass. Jax was all over the place. Nellies wide open system will enable him to have more games like this.

And idiots like AHF will be all over his jock, as if he'd be able to produce numbers like that for a team with a winning philosophy where he'd come off the bench and be the fourth option at best. Idiots like AHF don't know how to read a stat sheet and know little about basketball other than as a chance to be blowhards. Might as well go to a Britney Spears newsgroup for all they're worth.

Stephen Jackson + San Antonio Spurs = instant championship, fun and profits!!!

Morons.

Aggie Hoopsfan
01-21-2007, 05:00 PM
Suck my dick, cocksucking, George Bush-loving nancy boy. Etc.

So I see you're conceding the argument :lol

Aggie Hoopsfan
01-21-2007, 05:01 PM
And idiots like AHF will be all over his jock, as if he'd be able to produce numbers like that for a team with a winning philosophy where he'd come off the bench and be the fourth option at best. Idiots like AHF don't know how to read a stat sheet and know little about basketball other than as a chance to be blowhards. Might as well go to a Britney Spears newsgroup for all they're worth.

Stephen Jackson + San Antonio Spurs = instant championship, fun and profits!!!

Morons.

I'd be all over his jock because he's already proven (coincidentally with our team - you know, the Spurs) that he can be an integral piece of a championship winning team.

Stat sheets? Fuck you and your cracker ass stat sheets. Jax has proven he can produce in the clutch in the NBA Fucking Finals.

Morons? Let's think about this... you're the one trying to run down Stephen Jackson about his performance from last night while running around in the off-season clamoring for us to give the whole mid-level exemption to a scrub ass Roberto Javtokas that got lit up by Wang Zhi Zhi.

Who's the moron again?

ChumpDumper
01-21-2007, 05:09 PM
So is it safe to say the reports of a Jackson buyout were:

a) premature?

b) bogus?

c) wishful thinking?

Really, I'd be fine if we could pick up Barnes or Azubuike from them.

Bob Lanier
01-21-2007, 05:12 PM
I am still all over his jock because had once proven (coincidentally with our team - you know, the Spurs) that he could be an integral piece of a championship winning team.

Stat sheets? Fuck you and your cracker ass stat sheets. Jax had proven he could produce in the clutch in the NBA Fucking Finals.

Mr. Body
01-21-2007, 05:12 PM
link (http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/44320/20070121/jacksons_influence_on_granger_the_final_straw/)


Jackson's Influence On Granger The Final Straw?
21st January, 2007 - 12:14 pm
New York Daily News -
The Pacers believe Danny Granger can develop into a superstar and they thought Stephen Jackson was becoming a strong negative influence on the young player, which was a key reason for this week's trade.

"That was the last straw," said a source. "They saw what was happening and didn't want (Jackson) to be a negative influence on Granger."


Sweet!

Now, you chowderhead supporters, explain to me how you think the Spurs were ever going to want this guy back. Use full sentences instead of grunts.

Bob Lanier
01-21-2007, 05:14 PM
Luckily the Spurs don't have anyone whom the terms "can develop" or "young player" apply to.

Aggie Hoopsfan
01-21-2007, 05:19 PM
link (http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/44320/20070121/jacksons_influence_on_granger_the_final_straw/)




Sweet!

Now, you chowderhead supporters, explain to me how you think the Spurs were ever going to want this guy back. Use full sentences instead of grunts.

If you had been paying attention all this time, you'd know that even before he got to the Spurs originally, Jax was a bit of a problem child.

But between Tim and Pop, they kept him in check, and would do so again.

The only reason Jax is being singled out like that article you cite is because he's not on the team, and JO still is. Gotta have some excuse to get rid of a player, so claiming negative influence appeases the local peons, much like the bullshit that gets pushed out in the E-N through Ludden and Harvey.

That's okay though, maybe the Spurs can accommodate your rants and bring in Javtokas this summer for the full MLE, then we can have our 5 million dollar 12th man.

When it comes to your basketball 'knowledge', Manny was a prophet.

Mr. Body
01-22-2007, 05:53 AM
That's okay though, maybe the Spurs can accommodate your rants and bring in Javtokas this summer for the full MLE, then we can have our 5 million dollar 12th man.


:lol Wow, are you retarded.

Bruno
01-22-2007, 06:41 AM
It's not a surprise that Jackson is doing well with Warriors. Run&Gun offense has always been great for athletic shooters like Jax.
Given Spurs offense, what he has done with Pacers is more meaningfull to what he can do with Spurs than what he will do with Warriors.

Gerryatrics
01-22-2007, 08:14 AM
In regulation ...

LeBron 27p, 7r, 5a, 8to

SJax 28p, 5r, 4a, 6to -- but hey, he got those to back with 5 steals :fro

Barry 23p, 1r, 2a, 0to, made 8-11, 5-8 from 3 in 22 minutes, off the bench. :fro

Mr. Body
01-22-2007, 10:09 AM
Barry 23p, 1r, 2a, 0to, made 8-11, 5-8 from 3 in 22 minutes, off the bench. :fro

According to timvp, the Clippers will now call to trade Maggette straight up for him.