Congratulations !!!

[Hook Dem]

CONGRATULATIONS !!!

WE THE PEOPLE ….. HELPED RE-ELECT PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
IN SPITE OF THE “SPIN” AND “ENDORSEMENTS” OF JOHN KERRY BY THE LIBERAL MEDIA:


Peter Jennings ABC


Tom Brokaw NBC


Dan Rather CBS



Larry King, Wolf Blitzer, &

James Carville of CNN


The New York Times


The Los Angeles Times


The Washington Post


Chicago Sun-Times


San Francisco Chronicle


The Boston Globe


The Philadelphia Inquirer


Arizona Daily Star


The Oregonian


The Seattle Times


The New Yorker


The Star-Ledger


etc. etc. etc.


AND OTHER KERRY ENDORSEMENTS BY:


The Communist Party


Vietnamese Communists


The Socialist Party


Yasser Arafat


Organization of the Islamic Conference


American Muslim Taskforce


AND THE FOLLOWING KERRY SUPPORTERS:


Bill and Hillary Clinton


Jimmy Carter and Al Gore


Sen. Ted Kennedy & Sen. Robert Byrd


Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson


General Wesley Clark and Sandy Berger


George Soros and Richard Clarke


Sen. Tom Daschle and Rep. Nancy Polosi


John Kerry and the other John Kerry


AND 99.99% OF THE HOLLYWOOD CROWD:


Michael Moore & Barbra Streisand


Steven Bing & Ben Affleck


Bruce Springsteen & Michael Stipe


George Clooney & Martin Sheen


Michael J. Fox & Warren Beatty


Aaron Sorkin & Harvey Weinstein


etc. etc. etc.


PLUS:


DNC and Kerry Campaign attorneys attempting to intimidate anyone who did not agree with Kerry including the Swift Boat Veterans and the P.O.W.’s


AND WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM:


United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan


France’s President Jacques Chirac


Germany’s Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder



IT IS AMAZING, BUT WE DID IT WITH OUR SECRET WEAPON CALLED THE “TRUTH”

[NeoConIV]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/jeremydane71/werddawg.jpg

[dcole50]

Vietnamese Communists
:rolleyes

[JoeChalupa]

And Kerry still managed 57 million votes in spite of Rush Limbaugh, Sean insHannity, the Savage Nation, Ann Coultergeist, Laura Ingram, William Bennett, etc..

Yeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! !!!!!!!!111

[Yonivore]

And Kerry still managed 57 million votes in spite of Rush Limbaugh, Sean insHannity, the Savage Nation, Ann Coultergeist, Laura Ingram, William Bennett, etc..

Yeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! !!!!!!!!111
I'd remove Michael Savage from that list; he's not much of a Bush fan either...

And, don't forget, Kerry had Dan Blather, Peterless Jennings, and Tom Brokejaw in his corner (two of which are now, thankfully, gone from our T.V. screens). Not to mention the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, and countless editors all pully for him...

I'm surprised that between that and all the typical Demoncratic chicanery, he wasn't able to "produce" more votes...

[Duff McCartney]

How many times does Hook Dem have to post forwarded emails he gets?

[Yonivore]

How many times does Hook Dem have to post forwarded emails he gets?
How many times are you going to complain about posts you voluntarily open?

[Bandit2981]

And, don't forget, Kerry had Dan Blather, Peterless Jennings, and Tom Brokejaw in his corner
conservatives love to throw this out there, but i have yet to see anyone offer any proof that these newscasters were pro-kerry and have an anti-bush bias...help me out Yoni, or anyone...show me evidence to back up your claims

[Yonivore]

conservatives love to throw this out there, but i have yet to see anyone offer any proof that these newscasters were pro-kerry and have an anti-bush bias...help me out Yoni, or anyone...show me evidence to back up your claims
You must have missed the whole forged documents thingie...

[Yonivore]

Another thing Bandit; find me the Democratic/Liberal/Left equivalent of the Media Research Center and their pages and pages and pages of Mainstream Media Bias examples and we'll talk.

One might argue that the Media Research Center is biased in favor of Republicans/Conservatives/Right however, one would be hard pressed to produce a Democratic/Liberal/Left answer to the MRC...

Why do I think that is? Because there is no Republican/Conservative/Right bias in the Mainstream Media. Fox News only looks that way because of how far to the left the rest of the major networks are...

And, those outlets the Left usually complain about...They're KNOWN Conservative sources...The Rush Limbaugh Show, Sean Hannity, etc... They don't hide their bias and they certainly don't try and present their views as unbiased.

But, I'll wait until you provide your answer to the Media Research Center before passing final judgement.

[Hook Dem]

How many times does Hook Dem have to post forwarded emails he gets?
Blow me Duff!!! Get back to me when you get through playing with your siblings and living with mom and dad. You don't even have a clue what life is about yet and at your present level, you may never find out. Don't come in here where men reside and spew your childish comments. :flipoff

[Bandit2981]

You must have missed the whole forged documents thingie...
you mean the yellow cake uranium ones? rather didnt forge the documents himself, he reported on what was given to him at the time, much like your defense of Bush and his initial and main reason for invading iraq

One might argue that the Media Research Center is biased in favor of Republicans/Conservatives/Right however, one would be hard pressed to produce a Democratic/Liberal/Left answer to the MRC...
huh? so your argument that the MRC is NOT biased is that there is no liberal version that you know of to counter it?

Why do I think that is? Because there is no Republican/Conservative/Right bias in the Mainstream Media. Fox News only looks that way because of how far to the left the rest of the major networks are...
uhh, maybe you should watch the movie Outfoxed and then rethink your last statement...a conservative definition of "liberal bias" is anything factual reported in the news that doesnt fit what the talking heads and spinmeisters are yapping about all day on AM radio...like ive stated before, i dont think there is really a large conspiracy bias in the media like you proclaim(you guys are always the victims in everything aren't you? damn...)its not a politically driven motive, its much more simple than that...the saying, "if it bleeds, it leads" always holds true(like when you ask why only the carnage in iraq is reported, not the improvements)...when people stop tuning in to watch, they will change.

And, those outlets the Left usually complain about...They're KNOWN Conservative sources...The Rush Limbaugh Show, Sean Hannity, etc... They don't hide their bias and they certainly don't try and present their views as unbiased.
liberals dont complain about "bias" from rush and hannity, we know they are republican and proud...the problem is, there is no balance...you ask about the left version of MRC, where is the left version of AM radio? it doesnt exist. one side dominates a whole media arm and proclaims it. ive never seen brokaw, jennings, or rather claim they are hardcore liberal and constantly disparage the other side when on air

But, I'll wait until you provide your answer to the Media Research Center before passing final judgement.
i dont know what you want me to say...all the MRC tells me is there is another conservative gripe-tank out there trying to paint the whole party as the victims an the target of everything when they run the whole country...talk about idiocy

[Yonivore]

you mean the yellow cake uranium ones? rather didnt forge the documents himself, he reported on what was given to him at the time, much like your defense of Bush and his initial and main reason for invading iraq
No, the Dan Rather ones...I have no idea what you're talking about. President Bush's SOTUA remarks had nothing to do with the memos in question. You obviously don't get out much...

huh? so your argument that the MRC is NOT biased is that there is no liberal version that you know of to counter it?
No, my argument is that if there was a Conservative bias in the Mainstream Media there WOULD be a Liberal counter to the Media Research Center. Damn, did your ability to nuance die on November 2nd -- along with your candidate?

uhh, maybe you should watch the movie Outfoxed and then rethink your last statement...a conservative definition of "liberal bias" is anything factual reported in the news that doesnt fit what the talking heads and spinmeisters are yapping about all day on AM radio...like ive stated before, i dont think there is really a large conspiracy bias in the media like you proclaim(you guys are always the victims in everything aren't you? damn...)its not a politically driven motive, its much more simple than that...the saying, "if it bleeds, it leads" always holds true(like when you ask why only the carnage in iraq is reported, not the improvements)...when people stop tuning in to watch, they will change.
I don't think so but, thanks for the suggestion. OH, and I never suggested it was a conspiracy, just that the media faces are Liberals unable to hide their bias.

liberals dont complain about "bias" from rush and hannity, we know they are republican and proud...the problem is, there is no balance...you ask about the left version of MRC, where is the left version of AM radio? it doesnt exist. one side dominates a whole media arm and proclaims it. ive never seen brokaw, jennings, or rather claim they are hardcore liberal and constantly disparage the other side when on air
Nobody will buy Left leaning AM radio because you're all full of crap and can't hold up under caller scrutiny or the mere revelation of facts around you.

i dont know what you want me to say...all the MRC tells me is there is another conservative gripe-tank out there trying to paint the whole party as the victims an the target of everything when they run the whole country...talk about idiocy
So stop the whining already...

[Bandit2981]

So stop the whining already...
:lol :lol :rollin
just when i thought a conservative couldnt get anymore pathetic...how often have i posted here recently? compare my number of "whining" posts to your multiple-times-a-day posts kicking and screaming that the whole world is constantly conspiring against you, like france, the UN, the boogeyman, liberal media, bill clinton from 5 years ago still coming after you, the ACLU, 95% of the papers in the country, every anchor on every news channel not starting with "F" and ending with "ox", china, the commie under your bed, man...its always good for a laugh though, you paranoid bastard :lol

[Duff McCartney]

You don't even have a clue what life is about yet and at your present level, you may never find out.

Unlike you old man I don't profess to know what life is about. I know what my life is about.

[Hook Dem]

Unlike you old man I don't profess to know what life is about. I know what my life is about.
That sounds funny coming from someone who has an opinion about everything. Heavy on the "old man" please!!!! You'll never make it. Someone will always be pissing in your post toasties. Good luck loser !!!! :lol

[dcole50]

just wondering ... what exactly did brokaw do to hurt bush's campaign or aid kerry's?

[Yonivore]

just wondering ... what exactly did brokaw do to hurt bush's campaign or aid kerry's?
You can be biased without actually being beneficial.

The fact remains, it was clear the mainstream media wanted John Kerry to win the presidential election and that they wanted George Bush to lose.

[Duff McCartney]

You can be biased without actually being beneficial.

So whats the point of being bias? Or actually complaining about it? It's not like it helped anyway.

[Yonivore]

So whats the point of being bias? Or actually complaining about it? It's not like it helped anyway.
Because it's divisive.

[JoeChalupa]

I'd remove Michael Savage from that list; he's not much of a Bush fan either...

And, don't forget, Kerry had Dan Blather, Peterless Jennings, and Tom Brokejaw in his corner (two of which are now, thankfully, gone from our T.V. screens). Not to mention the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, and countless editors all pully for him...

I'm surprised that between that and all the typical Demoncratic chicanery, he wasn't able to "produce" more votes...

I still say that Kerry did well with over 57 million votes.
Between FoxNews and all the typical Repugnant rhetoric and scare tactics I was surprised he was able to produce as many as he did.
That proves that not all Americans were duped by the repugnants.

Well, at least almost anybody who was a write in candidate got more votes than your repugnant, errr..libertarian candidate. :lol

[Yonivore]

I still say that Kerry did well with over 57 million votes.
That depends on how he got them...but, since he still lost, who cares.

Between FoxNews...
What'd they do?

...and all the typical Repugnant rhetoric...
Such as?

...and scare tactics...
Again, such as?

I was surprised he was able to produce as many as he did.
Really? surprised? I seem to recall most Kerry supporters, in this forum, feeling he was going to trounce Bush in the general election...typical revisionism by the Left.

That proves that not all Americans were duped by the repugnants.
Or, it proves Kerry fooled more people than was thought...

Well, at least almost anybody who was a write in candidate got more votes than your repugnant, errr..libertarian candidate. :lol
I voted for Bush!