CONGRATULATIONS !!!
WE THE PEOPLE ….. HELPED RE-ELECT PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
IN SPITE OF THE “SPIN” AND “ENDORSEMENTS” OF JOHN KERRY BY THE LIBERAL MEDIA:
Peter Jennings ABC
Tom Brokaw NBC
Dan Rather CBS
Larry King, Wolf Blitzer, &
James Carville of CNN
The New York Times
The Los Angeles Times
The Washington Post
Chicago Sun-Times
San Francisco Chronicle
The Boston Globe
The Philadelphia Inquirer
Arizona Daily Star
The Oregonian
The Seattle Times
The New Yorker
The Star-Ledger
etc. etc. etc.
AND OTHER KERRY ENDORSEMENTS BY:
The Communist Party
Vietnamese Communists
The Socialist Party
Yasser Arafat
Organization of the Islamic Conference
American Muslim Taskforce
AND THE FOLLOWING KERRY SUPPORTERS:
Bill and Hillary Clinton
Jimmy Carter and Al Gore
Sen. Ted Kennedy & Sen. Robert Byrd
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson
General Wesley Clark and Sandy Berger
George Soros and Richard Clarke
Sen. Tom Daschle and Rep. Nancy Polosi
John Kerry and the other John Kerry
AND 99.99% OF THE HOLLYWOOD CROWD:
Michael Moore & Barbra Streisand
Steven Bing & Ben Affleck
Bruce Springsteen & Michael Stipe
George Clooney & Martin Sheen
Michael J. Fox & Warren Beatty
Aaron Sorkin & Harvey Weinstein
etc. etc. etc.
PLUS:
DNC and Kerry Campaign attorneys attempting to intimidate anyone who did not agree with Kerry including the Swift Boat Veterans and the P.O.W.’s
AND WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM:
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan
France’s President Jacques Chirac
Germany’s Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder
IT IS AMAZING, BUT WE DID IT WITH OUR SECRET WEAPON CALLED THE “TRUTH”
And Kerry still managed 57 million votes in spite of Rush Limbaugh, Sean insHannity, the Savage Nation, Ann Coultergeist, Laura Ingram, William Bennett, etc..
Yeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! !!!!!!!!111
I'd remove Michael Savage from that list; he's not much of a Bush fan either...
And, don't forget, Kerry had Dan Blather, Peterless Jennings, and Tom Brokejaw in his corner (two of which are now, thankfully, gone from our T.V. screens). Not to mention the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, and countless editors all pully for him...
I'm surprised that between that and all the typical Demoncratic chicanery, he wasn't able to "produce" more votes...
How many times does Hook Dem have to post forwarded emails he gets?
How many times are you going to complain about posts you voluntarily open?
conservatives love to throw this out there, but i have yet to see anyone offer any proof that these newscasters were pro-kerry and have an anti-bush bias...help me out Yoni, or anyone...show me evidence to back up your claimsAnd, don't forget, Kerry had Dan Blather, Peterless Jennings, and Tom Brokejaw in his corner
You must have missed the whole forged do ents thingie...
Another thing Bandit; find me the Democratic/Liberal/Left equivalent of the Media Research Center and their pages and pages and pages of Mainstream Media Bias examples and we'll talk.
One might argue that the Media Research Center is biased in favor of Republicans/Conservatives/Right however, one would be hard pressed to produce a Democratic/Liberal/Left answer to the MRC...
Why do I think that is? Because there is no Republican/Conservative/Right bias in the Mainstream Media. Fox News only looks that way because of how far to the left the rest of the major networks are...
And, those outlets the Left usually complain about...They're KNOWN Conservative sources...The Rush Limbaugh Show, Sean Hannity, etc... They don't hide their bias and they certainly don't try and present their views as unbiased.
But, I'll wait until you provide your answer to the Media Research Center before passing final judgement.
Blow me Duff!!! Get back to me when you get through playing with your siblings and living with mom and dad. You don't even have a clue what life is about yet and at your present level, you may never find out. Don't come in here where men reside and spew your childish comments.
you mean the yellow cake uranium ones? rather didnt forge the do ents himself, he reported on what was given to him at the time, much like your defense of Bush and his initial and main reason for invading iraqYou must have missed the whole forged do ents thingie...
huh? so your argument that the MRC is NOT biased is that there is no liberal version that you know of to counter it?One might argue that the Media Research Center is biased in favor of Republicans/Conservatives/Right however, one would be hard pressed to produce a Democratic/Liberal/Left answer to the MRC...
uhh, maybe you should watch the movie Outfoxed and then rethink your last statement...a conservative definition of "liberal bias" is anything factual reported in the news that doesnt fit what the talking heads and spinmeisters are yapping about all day on AM radio...like ive stated before, i dont think there is really a large conspiracy bias in the media like you proclaim(you guys are always the victims in everything aren't you? damn...)its not a politically driven motive, its much more simple than that...the saying, "if it bleeds, it leads" always holds true(like when you ask why only the carnage in iraq is reported, not the improvements)...when people stop tuning in to watch, they will change.Why do I think that is? Because there is no Republican/Conservative/Right bias in the Mainstream Media. Fox News only looks that way because of how far to the left the rest of the major networks are...
liberals dont complain about "bias" from rush and hannity, we know they are republican and proud...the problem is, there is no balance...you ask about the left version of MRC, where is the left version of AM radio? it doesnt exist. one side dominates a whole media arm and proclaims it. ive never seen brokaw, jennings, or rather claim they are hardcore liberal and constantly disparage the other side when on airAnd, those outlets the Left usually complain about...They're KNOWN Conservative sources...The Rush Limbaugh Show, Sean Hannity, etc... They don't hide their bias and they certainly don't try and present their views as unbiased.
i dont know what you want me to say...all the MRC tells me is there is another conservative gripe-tank out there trying to paint the whole party as the victims an the target of everything when they run the whole country...talk about idiocyBut, I'll wait until you provide your answer to the Media Research Center before passing final judgement.
No, the Dan Rather ones...I have no idea what you're talking about. President Bush's SOTUA remarks had nothing to do with the memos in question. You obviously don't get out much...
No, my argument is that if there was a Conservative bias in the Mainstream Media there WOULD be a Liberal counter to the Media Research Center. Damn, did your ability to nuance die on November 2nd -- along with your candidate?
I don't think so but, thanks for the suggestion. OH, and I never suggested it was a conspiracy, just that the media faces are Liberals unable to hide their bias.
Nobody will buy Left leaning AM radio because you're all full of crap and can't hold up under caller scrutiny or the mere revelation of facts around you.
So stop the whining already...
So stop the whining already...
just when i thought a conservative couldnt get anymore pathetic...how often have i posted here recently? compare my number of "whining" posts to your multiple-times-a-day posts kicking and screaming that the whole world is constantly conspiring against you, like france, the UN, the boogeyman, liberal media, bill clinton from 5 years ago still coming after you, the ACLU, 95% of the papers in the country, every anchor on every news channel not starting with "F" and ending with "ox", china, the commie under your bed, man...its always good for a laugh though, you paranoid bas
Unlike you old man I don't profess to know what life is about. I know what my life is about.
That sounds funny coming from someone who has an opinion about everything. Heavy on the "old man" please!!!! You'll never make it. Someone will always be pissing in your post toasties. Good luck loser !!!!
just wondering ... what exactly did brokaw do to hurt bush's campaign or aid kerry's?
You can be biased without actually being beneficial.
The fact remains, it was clear the mainstream media wanted John Kerry to win the presidential election and that they wanted George Bush to lose.
So whats the point of being bias? Or actually complaining about it? It's not like it helped anyway.
Because it's divisive.
I still say that Kerry did well with over 57 million votes.
Between FoxNews and all the typical Repugnant rhetoric and scare tactics I was surprised he was able to produce as many as he did.
That proves that not all Americans were duped by the repugnants.
Well, at least almost anybody who was a write in candidate got more votes than your repugnant, errr..libertarian candidate.
That depends on how he got them...but, since he still lost, who cares.
What'd they do?
Such as?
Again, such as?
Really? surprised? I seem to recall most Kerry supporters, in this forum, feeling he was going to trounce Bush in the general election...typical revisionism by the Left.
Or, it proves Kerry fooled more people than was thought...
I voted for Bush!Well, at least almost anybody who was a write in candidate got more votes than your repugnant, errr..libertarian candidate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
