Why are you so ing obsessed with arguing the subject?
Post it here, Cosmored.
No YouTubes, no links.
Just your own words.
Why are you so ing obsessed with arguing the subject?
Why do you care?
This is Cosmo's time to shine.
Chumpy butthurt is an ugly thing..
Evasive dan is an entertaining thing.
Your own thread has been made for you, dan.
Post your theory there.
God this troll is tired... and I hate truthers...
make it official.
Actually, you made nothing clear at all. You started out with a stupid claim about a fighter jet hitting the Pentagon and then just said some throwaway lines like thermite is important and "they" did it for the oil. Then you just ejaculated a slew of poorly written mumbo jumbo and approximately nine hours of YouTubes even you wouldn't watch.
You simply aren't capable of of making a sane argument in your own words about what really happened on 9/11 because you know deep down that none of your conspiracy theories could ever actually pan out and that if you ever dared to commit to a theory that attempts to explain all the events of 9/11, it would be easily picked apart by the simplest logic and critical thinking.
After a decade, you have no explanation and no theory -- all you have are a bunch of links that make no sense when considered as a whole and a persecution complex and a list of imaginary enemies whom you think are paid by the government to laugh at you on a basketball message board.
By failing miserably to even start a basic explanation in your own words, you proved that you aren't serious about any of this and can forever be dismissed out of hand.
I'm sure your next post will be more whining about shills and disinfo agents and a few more hours of YouTubes you never watched.
If you are that much smarter than everybody else, putting forth your theory shouldn't be that hard.
"If I have to spell out what I think, you're not worth the time."
Ahhh...the Wild Cobra defense.
you posted a theory?
you posted a theory!
I think the government planned and carried out the attacks so they would have a pretext to go into the Middle East and take control of the oil there. The way the towers fell alone proves that the the government was behind it.
Yay. An actual theory.
Now all we need to do is identify the people who planned it and executed it.
That and show how it would be possible, to a reasonable degree to do.
That and then explain how we didn't end up in control of any oil in Afghanistan, and not really in control of the oil in Iraq either...
You'll have to be more specific. The "controlling the oil" conspiracy didn't really work out for you, so you'll have to explain how you're actually trying to tie this to your 9/11 conspiracy theory.
Like what? I was taught a lot of things in school. Most of it is totally believable. Like math.Do you believe what we are taught in school?
Sometimes. Not all the time -- but if your only reason for the US government's killing 3000 of its own citizens and destabilizing its own economy for years was to get det oil -- which they didn't actually get -- I'd say there were far easier and less costly ways to go about it.Do you believe that the US goes to war to defend freedom and democracy in the world?
Now, explain your theory.
Actually, the oil conspiracy thingy worked out pretty well. Today, Iraq exports twice the amount of Petroleum it did with Saddam, (no other country has doubled capacity) much of that investment by Pro-NATO forces countries that either supported or remained neutral while NATO attacked a country which had not supported international terrorismYou'll have to be more specific. The "controlling the oil" conspiracy didn't really work out for you, so you'll have to explain how you're actually trying to tie this to your 9/11 conspiracy theory
How much oil does the US get from Iraq
One of the reason that 9/11 conspiracy theories have continued to persist is because the 911 Commission and NIST did such a poor job providing peer-reviewed scientific evidence of its theories concerning the collapse of WTC towers 1,2 and 7. We have chairpersons of the 9/11 commission calling for a new investigation because they feel that evidence that could have made the case for state sponsored support of terrorism was withheld and some witnesses flat out lied to the commission. Yet Chumpy and RG know better than most members of the commission....it would be laughable if it weren't so sad...You simply aren't capable of of making a sane argument in your own words about what really happened on 9/11 because you know deep down that none of your conspiracy theories could ever actually pan out and that if you ever dared to commit to a theory that attempts to explain all the events of 9/11, it would be easily picked apart by the simplest logic and critical thinking.
How much oil did the US control (or NATO, remember one world government) in Iraq under Saddam?
I have to support ChumpDumper in making this topic it would be nice to give our "personal" views on 9/11 w/o
All the links and copy n paste.
I seriously doubt anyone will give a legitimate reason WTC7 collapsed due to a few small fires.
You claim to have gone to MIT?
If you don't understand what heat does to steel, then I say bull to you being a student there.
Please give us links to quotes from the chairpersons of the 9/11 commission proving your contention.
You have been called out again.
Do you want your own thread?
Nevermind, you would never say what you think really happened on 9/11 anyway.
I don't know. How much?
Do you want your own thread?
Never mind you would never say the truth of what happened on 9/11
Start it. See what happens.
I have said what I believe really happened on 9/11 many, many times.
You and your ilk never, ever have -- and never will. It's amazing that you are so sure that it didn't happen one way, but can't even imagine a way it could have happened in that case. That's because deep down you know you are full of and nothing you dream up would stand even the mildest scrutiny.
Normally, I'd be inclined to tell you folks to STFU since you really have nothing to say about this topic. Now, however, I welcome your snarky posts that say nothing, because it proves you have nothing to say.
So I'll keep asking and you will never answer, and we'll all know why:
What do you think really happened on 9/11?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)