Page 1 of 99 123451151 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 2468
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

    It's too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...757-G-JMAA.jpg


    edit 4/2/15
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    That picture has since been shown to be doctored. It's explained here.

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
    (2:13:35 time mark)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.

    The picture is consistent with these analyses.
    http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
    http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/A...March2006.html

    Also, we know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of this page...
    http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm

    ...and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn't fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.

    A 757 would look like this.
    http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com...ntacamscam.jpg

    This analysis makes it pretty clear that a 757 wouldn't fit behind the box.
    http://0911.voila.net/index4.htm
    (fifth picture from top)

    (added 12-26-15)

    The above link is dead so here's the picture from the link to which I'm referring.
    http://www.911-strike.com/ldsxox1.gif


    (added 3-18-11)
    ---------------------------------------
    I copied the top picture on this page and blew it up to a full page to check the math of the above proof.
    http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm

    The length of the picture is 280 mm.

    In the picture the height of the Pentagon at the point where it's as far from the camera from the plane is 18 mm.

    The space between the left side of the box and the tail of the plane is 20 mm. If we increase that by twenty percent to allow for the angle, it's 24 mm. Since a 757 is twice as long as the Pentagon is high, a 757 would be 36 mm at that spot. It's pretty clear that it's a valid proof.
    ---------------------------------------

    Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you'll see the hole made by the craft.
    http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

    There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.
    http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d...37c495d8834-pi

    There's quite a difference.

    Here's a blown up photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
    http://www.sott.net/signs/editorials...otInvolved.php
    (excerpt)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Is it more clear now? Can you see Flight 77 in all its glory? All we can see is an amorphous white blob that looks more like a car than the nose cone of any aircraft. Obviously the images are too grainy to be of any use to anyone. At this point then, the most we can say is that an amorphous white blob with definite Islamic terrorists leanings hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I agree with the person who wrote that it doesn't prove that a 757 hit the Pentagon but I disagree with his saying the photo isn't of any use to anyone. If we look at the high-resolution picture, it's obviously the nose of a fighter-type craft.
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

    Look at the second picture from the top on this page.
    http://insider-outsider.blogspot.com...eo-should.html

    I know the scale is wrong and the 757 is too big but it gives us an idea of what we should have seen in the video released by the government considering all the cameras that surround the Pentagon.
    At the 3:55 time mark of this video it's pointed out that there were lots of cameras at the Pentagon.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNsSn6D3CP4

    They must have footage of the craft hitting the Pentagon. They just don't want us to see it because we'll know it wasn't a 757.

    These four articles are important.
    http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/03/335425.shtml
    http://www.physics911.net/omholt
    http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06...-pentagon.html
    http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
    (excerpt)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    At the 26:55 time mark of part one of this video series...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCHN-1Yk5LI
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxorz4jWDMY

    ...the some good points about the Pentagon are made.

    added 8/21/12
    --------------------------------------------------
    http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_15.htm
    http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_16.htm
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88JQL4esHFg
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ
    (good Pentagon analysis at 29:00 time mark)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    added 8/27/15
    -------
    Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXA-enq65ng


    There are some good documentaries in this link.
    http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

    Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions".

    This stuff below is good too. The first two deal with the "Thermite" issue which is important.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pu0UwSurMw
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSh5o6ca8FM
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwThcdIoufc
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAAztWC5sT8
    http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9t_i08d1xc
    http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06...-pentagon.html
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFGhMBUORx8
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
    (8 parts)

    (added 5/21/11)
    ---------------------
    http://www.thepentacon.com/eyeofthestorm.htm
    ---------------------

    (added 8/27/15)
    ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 911 TRUTH (full unreleased version)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo

    Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

    The Death of Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko after Speaking about 9/11 WTC 7 Building 7
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA
    -------------------------------


    In this clip the representative from NIST is playing dumb about the pools of molten steel.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg

    Here's a 6 part video about group of architects that think 9/11 was in inside job.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhPlV99AVQE

    I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.
    http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums...pic.php?t=1222

    This article deals with that subject.
    http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/20...echniques.html
    (excerpt)
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.
    This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.
    Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.
    --------------------------------------------------------------

    Here's a disinfo agent misrepresenting the truth movement by assuming that truthers believe the no-plane theory and then showing the no-plane theory to be false.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUazHEBlDGI

    The trouble is that truthers already know it's false.

    edit 8-10-12
    ------------------------------
    This video went off-line for a while but now it's back.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
    "provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents"

    Here's another.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhrZ57XxYJU
    "The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers: Zwicker (#3"


    Do a YouTube search on "9/11 news disinfo" to see more.


    They pulled off the 9/11 attack so they would have a pretext to invade the Middle East to get control of the oil there. This is an old story.

    http://video.google.es/videosearch?q=terror+storm#
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html
    http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...atingenemy.htm

    This may be why they needed a pretext to invade Afganistan.
    http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Ce...ghanistan.html

    Here's some stuff about the history of US and British meddling in the Middle East.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...40865741878159
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...000history.htm
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...itishindex.htm
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...niesiniraq.htm
    http://www.war-times.org/pdf/Oil%20leaflet.pdf
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/i...protection.htm

    These two are important.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...38213439292490
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jle47NiSNSQ

    Here's some more stuff.
    http://killtown.911review.org/911links.html#forums

    http://www.consensus911.org/the-911-consensus-points/
    http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/claim.html
    http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11...n-was-hit.html
    http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#5
    http://www.netctr.com/media.html
    http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html
    http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#q=...3e2739446bc197
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95iNfM9QYVk
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E

    Important-
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxintgbjLcw

    If this link goes dead, do a YouTube search on,
    "Psychologists help 9 11 Truth Deniers".


    edit 5/28/16
    -------------------------------------------

    Starting on page #72 of this thread a campaign is being waged to bury my posts to keep the young people reading here from seeing the info. I'm therefore going to post the posts they are trying to bury here to thwart them. You can also just do page searches on my username to find my buried posts.

    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8540913
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746&page=73&p=8593669&viewfull =1#post8593669
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8695259
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746&page=75&p=8743945&viewfull =1#post8743945
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8769615
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746&page=75&p=8774447&viewfull =1#post8774447
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8825653
    Last edited by Cosmored; 11-11-2017 at 10:18 AM.

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    I see you took the time to choose the Bulls as your favorite team. Nice.

  3. #3
    Believe me. Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    56,372
    I'm surprised nobody else has thought to start a thread like this.


  4. #4
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,539
    is the first picture from google street cam?

  5. #5
    Retired Ray xrayzebra's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    9,096
    Damn doesn't cosmered know that this has been gone over about how many times.
    Dumb is as dumb is.

    Pointy nose airplanes. Pointy headed posters.

    Stupid.....stupid.
    _____________________________
    "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."
    - Ronald Reagan




  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    I see you took the time to choose the Bulls as your favorite team. Nice.
    Actually I'm not that much of a sports fan. I just like to watch the highlights. Since Michael Jordan left, I really haven't had a favorite team.

    I mainly came here because I wanted to share some research I'd done. If a theory is wrong, it'll fall by its own lack of merit. This is important. Why don't you check out the evidence and give your analysis of it?

  7. #7
    Retired Ray xrayzebra's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    9,096
    Gee I'll bet he even thinks he is the first to come up with all these links.

    I'll bet his mother is proud of him knowing how to google like that....

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    Damn doesn't cosmered know that this has been gone over about how many times.
    I've seen it gone over but I've never seen it debunked.

  9. #9
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    31,209
    I'm pretty sure Dick Cheney remote-controlled all of those drone aircraft from the safety of his secret underground lair below Bush's ranch in Crawford.

  10. #10
    Believe me. Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    56,372
    I've seen it gone over but I've never seen it debunked.
    hooray for trolls

  11. #11
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    How about some actual analyses of the evidence? Rhetoric and snide remarks don't prove anything.

  12. #12
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    31,209
    Hell, we should've made it look like the terrorists were Canadian and Mexican so we could use it as a pretext to invade their oil fields. We get most of our oil from those two countries.

  13. #13
    Retired Ray xrayzebra's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    9,096
    I've seen it gone over but I've never seen it debunked.
    That's because you aren't too bright. Look at the friggin video footage,
    I am sure Goodmorning America staged that plane flying into the building.

    And I know for damn sure a good friend of mine who was in the towers
    when it happened would slap you up side you face and tell you to get real.

    She witnessed the second plane. And was screaming her butt off.

    Damn idiots. Bet you voted for Obama.

  14. #14
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    31,209
    I'm pretty sure the OP would make a fine candidate for Green Jobs Czar.


    Is that job still available?

  15. #15
    keep asking questions George Gervin's Afro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    11,409
    Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

    It's too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
    http://www.caverca.com/Images/Boeing...0TACV%2001.jpg

    The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.

    The picture is consistent with these analyses.
    http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
    http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/A...March2006.html

    Also, we know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of this page...
    http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm

    ...and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn't fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.

    A 757 would look like this.
    http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com...ntacamscam.jpg

    This analysis makes it pretty clear that a 757 wouldn't fit behind the box.
    http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

    Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you'll see the hole made by the craft.
    http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

    There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.
    http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d...37c495d8834-pi

    There's quite a difference.

    Here's a blown up photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
    http://www.sott.net/signs/editorials...otInvolved.php
    (excerpt)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Is it more clear now? Can you see Flight 77 in all its glory? All we can see is an amorphous white blob that looks more like a car than the nose cone of any aircraft. Obviously the images are too grainy to be of any use to anyone. At this point then, the most we can say is that an amorphous white blob with definite Islamic terrorists leanings hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I agree with the person who wrote that it doesn't prove that a 757 hit the Pentagon but I disagree with his saying the photo isn't of any use to anyone. If we look at the high-resolution picture, it's obviously the nose of a fighter-type craft.
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

    Look at the second picture from the top on this page.
    http://insider-outsider.blogspot.com...eo-should.html

    I know the scale is wrong and the 757 is too big but it gives us an idea of what we should have seen in the video released by the government considering all the cameras that surround the Pentagon.

    These three articles are important.
    http://www.physics911.net/omholt
    http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06...-pentagon.html
    http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
    (excerpt)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are some good documentaries in this link.
    http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

    Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions".

    This stuff below is good too. The first two deal with the "Thermite" issue which is important.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...07671184881047
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSh5o6ca8FM
    http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9t_i08d1xc
    http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06...-pentagon.html

    I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.
    http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums...pic.php?t=1222

    This article deals with that subject.
    http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/20...echniques.html
    (excerpt)
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.
    This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.
    Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.
    --------------------------------------------------------------

    So does this video.
    http://skoolpool.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
    (7:22 and 9:32 time marks)

    They pulled off the 9/11 attack so they would have a pretext to invade the Middle East to get control of the oil there. This is an old story.

    http://video.google.es/videosearch?q=terror+storm#
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html
    http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...atingenemy.htm

    Here's some stuff about the history of US and British meddling in the Middle East.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...40865741878159
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...000history.htm
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...itishindex.htm
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...niesiniraq.htm
    http://www.war-times.org/pdf/Oil%20leaflet.pdf
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/i...protection.htm

    These two are important.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...38213439292490
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jle47NiSNSQ

    Here's some more stuff.
    http://killtown.911review.org/911links.html#forums

    http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/claim.html
    http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11...n-was-hit.html
    http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#5
    http://www.netctr.com/media.html
    http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html
    I blame Obama because of his attempt to socialize this country.

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    That's because you aren't too bright. Look at the friggin video footage,
    I am sure Goodmorning America staged that plane flying into the building.

    And I know for damn sure a good friend of mine who was in the towers
    when it happened would slap you up side you face and tell you to get real.

    She witnessed the second plane. And was screaming her butt off.

    Damn idiots. Bet you voted for Obama.
    You don't seem to have even looked at post #1. I never said planes didn't hit the towers. I think that the "No Plane" theory was thought up by some government public-relations people to make the 9/11 truthers look silly.

    This is from post #1.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
    (7:22 and 9:32 time marks)

    If the link goes dead, do a YouTube search on, "provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents".
    Last edited by Cosmored; 10-26-2013 at 01:17 PM.

  17. #17
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,460
    You don't seem to have even looked at post #1. I never said planes didn't hit the towers. I think that the "No Plane" theory was thought up by some government public-relations people to make the 9/11 truthers look silly.

    This is from post #1.
    http://skoolpool.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
    (7:22 and 9:32 time marks)
    Why should anyone read your post when it's an absolute guarantee that there isn't anything in it that hasn't already been posted here countless times over the years? Un-crinkle your tin foil hat and go find some new conspiracy. This one is played out.

  18. #18
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    31,209
    I think that the "No Plane" theory was thought up by some government public-relations people to make the 9/11 truthers look silly.

    You guys don't really need any help in that department.

  19. #19
    sick demented ring****** ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    100,201
    Hey Cosmored, could you count up the total time of YouTubes you posted and want everyone to watch and spend that much time watching the debunking videos. Then post a careful and complete comparison of both.

    If it's really important to you, you will do this.
    _____________________________

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    Why should anyone read your post when it's an absolute guarantee that there isn't anything in it that hasn't already been posted here countless times over the years? Un-crinkle your tin foil hat and go find some new conspiracy. This one is played out.
    Has this been discussed?
    http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

    Whatever was in the space behind the box in the picture was too short to be a 757.

    The nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon was too pointed to be that of a 757.
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

    I've never seen this debunked yet. If this piece of evidence has been debunked, could somebody link to it here?

  21. #21
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    Hey Cosmored, could you count up the total time of YouTubes you posted and want everyone to watch and spend that much time watching the debunking videos. Then post a careful and complete comparison of both.
    I've watched a lot of debunk videos and they seem to have been made by professional sophists who didn't even believe their own arguments. The put forth alternative explanations for the evidence and then just consider it to be debunked. Why doesn't somebody post one specific thing that he or she thinks proves the government didn't plan and carry out the 9/11 attacks. I've posted what I think proves it. As far as I'm concerned, what's in post #20 closes the whole case.

    Somebody please address the evidence in post #20.

  22. #22
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,460
    I've never seen this debunked yet. If this piece of evidence has been debunked, could somebody link to it here?
    Or you could just follow Chump's suggestion and go look for yourself..........

  23. #23
    sick demented ring****** ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    100,201
    Has this been discussed?
    http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

    Whatever was in the space behind the box in the picture was too short to be a 757.

    The nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon was too pointed to be that of a 757.
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

    I've never seen this debunked yet. If this piece of evidence has been debunked, could somebody link to it here?
    You only need look at the pictures of the plane wreckage, especially from the Moussaoui trial.

    If a security cam was working at, say, one frame every 0.8 seconds -- what would the time stamps look like in whole second numbers?

  24. #24
    Democratic Socialist RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    36,569
    I've watched a lot of debunk videos and they seem to have been made by professional sophists who didn't even believe their own arguments. The put forth alternative explanations for the evidence and then just consider it to be debunked. Why doesn't somebody post one specific thing that he or she thinks proves the government didn't plan and carry out the 9/11 attacks. I've posted what I think proves it. As far as I'm concerned, what's in post #20 closes the whole case.

    Somebody please address the evidence in post #20.
    (Begin EDIT)
    FOR THOSE OF YOU READING THIS FOR THE FIRST TIME, SEE PAGES 3 AND 4 for the NIST FAQ that answers the biggest "truther" questions.(end EDIT)

    Since the 9-11 CTers like to copy and paste ad inifinitum, let's see if we can get some good stuff here.

    It might surprise you CTers but there is a whole cottage industry built up around your bullshit.

    They don't sell T-shirts, mugs, or crappy videos.

    http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

    http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...24912447824934

    http://www.911mysteriesguide.com/

    http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf

    Here is a gem: The 9-11 "truthers" in their own "like, words". Icky.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...66640147&hl=en

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html

    http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/

    http://wtc.nist.gov/

    http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

    http://www.911myths.com/

    Best one out of all the lot so far:
    http://www.debunking911.com/

    Mike Walter talking about the plane hitting the pentagon, and how irritated he is with the 9-11 "truth" movement for lying about what he said.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycPUDktZpCU

    Link to a TON of debunking links:
    http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm

    Here ARE SOME REALLY PRECIOUS LINKS.

    9-11 "truth" scholars turning on each other. You thought they were unstable and kooky when they talk about the government, wait until they start talking about each other.

    http://www.911myths.com/html/911_infighting_links.html


    A whole page of youtube debunking videos

    A whole page of decent debunking links and one of the best ones so far.
    The thing is that everytime someone debunks the bullshit, someone thinks of something new based on some half-assed, amatuer sleuthing, and thinks they have found the holy grail of conspiracy theories.

    I have seen it before.

    People like you spend hours on the websites because you are inclined to agree with them, and completely set aside any reasonable, critical questions that should be asked by any fair assessment.

    You have never honestly questioned this or attempted to find a fair alternative explanation. Please don't think you have been thorough or provided compelling proof.

    After the umpteenth time where I bothered to do background confirmations on conspiracy bullshit, I just don't bother anymore. It never pans out and the fanatics who post this shit onthe internet ALWAYS prove to be intellectually dishonest hacks.

    If you bothered to spend 1/10th the time on the debunking stuff I might post, I might bother to read your material, even though it is probably little more than an invitation to be the subject of a bukkakke of stupid.

    As it is... we know where you live, and you will be among the first herded into our death camps, unless you keep posting this. Then we may have to arrange an evil conspiracy "accident". Buwahahahahaha.

    Come to the dark side, we have health insurance, and paid vacations.
    Last edited by RandomGuy; 01-20-2010 at 03:01 PM.
    _____________________________
    To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. -- The kind of Republican that would kicked out of the party today.

    "You know what uranium is, right? Its this thing called nuclear weapons. And other things. Like lots of things are done with uranium. Including some bad things." -President Trump

    Putin has built up their military again and again and again. Their military is much stronger. Hes doing nuclear, were not doing anything. Our nuclear is old and tired and his nuclear is tippy-top from what I hear. Better be careful, folks, okay? You better be careful. -President Trump



    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...16#post9293816

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,555
    You only need look at the pictures of the plane wreckage, especially from the Moussaoui trial.

    If a security cam was working at, say, one frame every 0.8 seconds -- what would the time stamps look like in whole second numbers?
    How does this explain the size of the craft that was behind the box in this picture?
    http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm
    http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

    How does this explain the shape of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon?
    http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

    Please answer the questions that I ask you. Don't avoid them.

    Sorry to say this but you people are acting like sophists trying to obfuscate the evidence.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •