Reply With Quote
Sigh.. business is business, I'd do it..
The grumbles up there is tony parker for T Murphy, Brandon Rush, and Indy 10th pick....Ill help tony pack if indy takes it. (dont kill the messenger if this has been posted in 5 threads already)
http://blogs.indystar.com/pacersinsi...r_a_pacer.html
Last edited by The_Worlds_finest; 06-03-2010 at 12:02 PM.
Sigh.. business is business, I'd do it..
then why post this nonsense again
No.
the trade is a joke and you are a joke.
The lack of respect Tony Parker receives on this forum is sickening.
This.
You all are ing re ed... he's a ing good player u s needa recognize
This was mentioned in Chad Ford chat the other day:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155532
It's probably a rumor initiated by someone on the Indiana side (team/fan/reporter/whatever).
Swap out Murphy for Granger & its a deal!
If the Spurs do not want to extend Parker, this may very well be the best value available, if Indiana actually puts this on the table.
No way this is the best offer we get for Tony. If we feel like we are not going to extend him then we better get something better than this. Honestly id rather play the season out and let him walk then take on Brandon ing Rush and Matt Bonner Jr.
Matt Bonner Jr. Come on. Murphy is definitely better than Bonner. But I agree overall that TP would command more than this.
It gets more stupid every time it is posted.
This is the best offer the Spurs are going to get for Parker. There are many reasons why. Parker had an off-year and was plagued with injuries. Secondly, Parker's contract is expiring. Teams who trade for Parker have to consider Parker's decision to stay or leave their team after next season. With Parker being accustomed to winning, he may very well leave a lottery team like Indiana. , it is good that we actually get a decent 3 point shooting power forward who can rebound and a SG who can shoot the basketball on a cheap rookie contract plus a lottery pick with an outside chance at drafting Greg Monroe or some other talented big.
Assuming that a good team wants to trade for Parker, this below may very well be the offer.
Andre Miller + Martell Webster + Late 1st rounder = Tony Parker + Malik Hairston
I am not saying we trade Parker for such an offer from Indy or Portland but considering the cir stances, Parker's value couldn't be at an all-time low since 2005.
Im so sick of this "stretch 4" im going to go insane. Plus the guy is already 30 years old. Would be an absolute terrible trade. Take a look at the recent draft picks at the #10 position and it starts to make even less sense.
I agree with that. I am simply saying calling Murphy Bonner Jr. is crossing the line
If they're on a mission to move him and these are the best offers out there I would rather start the season and let Tony show that he still has it (which he will) and better offers will come. if it comes to that point Tony might be able to give the Spurs a shortlist of teams he would like to be traded to and I guarantee you those teams will put out a better offer than this. The only people not wanting Tony Parker right now as their point guard are spurs fans, and its pretty re ed if you ask me.
I agree with that. I am simply saying calling Murphy Bonner Jr. is crossing the line
There are much better offers imo that the Spurs could get for TP.
I might not even trade Hill for that package, much less ing Parker. Holy , any Spurs fan who is for that proposed swap is an idiot.
F that trade. You'd have to include Granger before I even think about it for a second.
Yeah, what about that sweet Michael Beasley deal?
Yeah that's credible...a rehashed rumor.
lol Michael Beasley.
The best part of the original post is ...
as if he has some inside information that hasn't been posted from Chad Ford's chat five times already
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
