He has no chance of winning this, tbh. Contrary to his and his slurpers' opinion, he is not en led to a starting job in the NFL.
He has no chance of winning this, tbh. Contrary to his and his slurpers' opinion, he is not en led to a starting job in the NFL.
This dude is ing re ed. Not only does he have no case, he’s going against billionaires’ attorneys.
Last edited by Darth_Pelican; 10-15-2017 at 06:51 PM.
lol, dude is basically kim kardashan at this point..
Good for him, I also hate to take responsibility for my actions.
Perhaps you should try being good at football tbh
He needs somebody in his corner to tell him to stay out of his own way. He's gonna be des ute if he loses this lawsuit.
But, but, but, he played in the Super Bowl
![]()
Where did anyone say he should start? The issue is about being signed to a team at all. And it has nothing to do with talent.
If he has memos, or emails he most definitely has a case.
man, who would have thought that little asshole from Nevada who ruined BSU's 2010 season would go on to ruin the NFL
Ruin the NFL how? By not standing for the flag? lol
if he can prove it that voids the cba completely
Kraep opted out because he wanted the opportunity to start elsewhere. Every team with a bad starting quarterback that doesn't sign him and make him their starter gets criticized by the SJWs. The media seems to think that he's en led to start in the NFL.
It absolutely has to do with talent and the difference between how he values himself and how the league values him. If Kraep didn't suck and wasn't asking for too much money, he'd still be playing on Sunday - kneeling or no kneeling.
i disagree kinda, he's not transcendent enough to warrant the signing. Vick and AP got jobs after they're bad PR and they did so because they weren't awful at their job
And if he doesn't have evidence of owners colluding in writing his case is toast. A smoking gun that leaves no doubt is the only way this case survives.
There's also no way the owners are stupid enough to put evidence of collusion in writing.
Yeah...even if there was some kind of blackballng, I doubt the owners would ever put anything in writing to each other. It would probably just be something understood.
That being said, any owner has the right to not try out a QB even based on at ude. I would think.
All 32 owners each making an individual decision is fine, collusion is what would be a CBA breach.
i personally don't buy the idea that any owner out there would sacrifice a potential upgrade in QB play for some hush hush agreement between owners. It's too much of a stretch.
another great role model for Black America in the NFL. Today's lesson is that it's ok to accept victimhood
It wouldn't be surprising.
He isn't asking for alot of money. He wants to be on a team. He would at least be a backup if he had never spoken out or knelt.
He opted out of $14mil because he thought he was good enough to earn more money on a longer contract as a starter. Nobody's fault but his own for his blind arrogance; this er thought he was above working out with Joe Montana and Jerry Rice during several offseasons.
You gave no reason as to why no one signed him. Owners want to mandate all players stand for the anthem. Why is that? Why now? Why not before Kaepernick spoke out and knelt? No son. Nothing to do with money. Plenty of crazy contracts passed out all the time like candy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)