Reply With Quote
I've always been a big fan of his, he's a stud! I bet da Bulls regret letting him go.
is averaging 12.5 rebounds a game...
He is starting to be a force in the nba
I've always been a big fan of his, he's a stud! I bet da Bulls regret letting him go.
the bulls ed up.... i knew it from when they made that trade.... they should have kept dude.......
What's the point of posting his number?
Just happened to be next to his name while copy and pasting?
he's been playing great although he tends to get into foul trouble A LOT
yah i was watching a game once when he was on the bulls he had 5 fouls in 5 minutes of play......
but whose better though?
chandler or curry?
they have different games.... on offense id take curry.... on defense and rebounding id take chandler
At $10M a season I'd take neither.
Reggie Evans costs less than half that and would likely rebound about the same if he played as many minutes.
And I don't know if I could ever trust Curry with his weight and work ethic, despite his offensive potential.
the guy is starting to be a force
a double double guy
duncan is not even averagin a double double this year
I love the guy...a garbage pail type player that everyone underestimated.
Chandler main quality is the defense, not the rebounding.
Being a good rebounder isn't enough to be a good player in nba.
You should wonder you why Evans who is the best rebounder in the league has only played 14 min over the last 6 games with Denver.
Last edited by Bruno; 03-07-2007 at 11:35 AM.
Chandler isn't a very good defender. He's a decent weakside shotblocker and a pretty athletic player overall, but he's no defensive stopper. The Hornets actually give up more points when Chandler is on the court than when he is off (+2.2 per 100 possessions).
Evans, on the other hand, isn't only a better rebounder but has also started to play defense this year. The Nuggets give up seven less points per 100 possessions when Evans is on the court.
I don't think George Karl has ever been accused of being a great coach. And uh, the Spurs are currently starting at center the player that began last year as the Nuggets' 12th man.
So either the Spurs' bigs are horrible or Karl doesn't know what he's doing as far as his bigman rotation.
did someone just say they owuld take reggie evans over chandler and curry?
If my choices were Chandler with a moster contract and a chronically bad back, Curry with a monster contract and a heart condition or Evans and a smallish contract, I'd take Evans hands down. Curry and Chandler are cap killers and neither one is good enough to warrant that type of money.did someone just say they owuld take reggie evans over chandler and curry?
Chandler isn't a very good defender. He's a decent weakside shotblocker and a pretty athletic player overall, but he's no defensive stopper. The Hornets actually give up more points when Chandler is on the court than when he is off (+2.2 per 100 possessions).
Evans, on the other hand, isn't only a better rebounder but has also started to play defense this year. The Nuggets give up seven less points per 100 possessions when Evans is on the court.
I agree that Chandler isn't a great man to man defender but he is more than a "decent" weakside shotblocker. To me, he is a very good team defender.
BTW, I wonder how points per possessions is a good stat to judge a player :
Bowen was at +2.7 last year and is at -7.6 this year on the defensive end. Evans looked good on the defensive end in the two or three games I've watched with him this year but I don't know if he has played good defense the whole year.
George Karl isn't stupid too. If he goes with a player like Najera over Evans, there is a reason.
I see nothing wrong with Elson case. It's not like he is playing great with Spurs and starting over Oberto isn't the biggest performance of the year.
The only thing that I don't understand at all is why Nuggets have signed Evans to a long term contract : AFAIK, he isn't playing worse than in the previous years (you even think that he is playing better D) and he is in the doghouse. What's the point to sign a player to a quite big contract if you don't use him while he plays at his level ?
He has popovichitis.
I agree that Chandler isn't a great man to man defender but he is more than a "decent" weakside shotblocker. To me, he is a very good team defender.
BTW, I wonder how points per possessions is a good stat to judge a player :
Bowen was at +2.7 last year and is at -7.6 this year on the defensive end. Evans looked good on the defensive end in the two or three games I've watched with him this year but I don't know if he has played good defense the whole year.
George Karl isn't stupid too. If he goes with a player like Najera over Evans, there is a reason.
I see nothing wrong with Elson case. It's not like he is playing great with Spurs and starting over Oberto isn't the biggest performance of the year.
The only thing that I don't understand at all is why Nuggets have signed Evans to a long term contract : AFAIK, he isn't playing worse than in the previous years (you even think that he is playing better D) and he is in the doghouse. What's the point to sign a player to a quite big contract if you don't use him while he plays at his level ?
Remember Rasho???
Dude was playing very well on D, was never known as a dunker and could've scored more if he wasn't playing with Timmy(KG spent most of his time on the perimeter)
________
Vaporizers info
Last edited by san antonio spurs; 09-17-2011 at 10:41 AM.
Rasho has had a good first season with Spurs and played a lot.
He has been in the doghouse after that because he wasn't at the same level. He was too a bad fit in the post-Shaq west conference but it wasn't the main reason since Spurs have tried to sign Przybilla last summer.
If Rasho was at the same level in 05-06 than in 03-04, he would have played more and he would still be a Spurs.
Are you serious? 20.2 and 10.6-7 is still a double-double.
maybe but well see if they make the playoffs and make it someware
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
