Reply With Quote
Tell us all about this effective gun legislation and make sure it’s cons utional.
dun legislation? Slow down, Lenny, you're drooling on your keyboard.
Tell us all about this effective gun legislation and make sure it’s cons utional.
Infowars is definitely an advocate for people having more guns, and tries to make the case.
https://www.infowars.com/18-little-k...make-us-safer/
NRA certainly goes down that route:
"Guns make colleges safer"
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2009...colleges-safer
"women with guns make america safer"
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2002...-america-safer
Which Is Safer? More Guns Or Fewer?
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2007...-guns-or-fewer
How about the "general position of the NRA"
https://www.foxnews.com/health/areas...hs-study-finds
The general stance can be found here:
https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/guns-in-america
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/12/lie...inia-politics/We’d be safer if more of us carried the tools of self-defense.
You asked for evidence... then review to look at it.
All of those links have people suggesting, directly, and indirectly, that more guns in our country will make us safer.
"guardians" in schools, etc.
Either you agree with the statement or not. You don't have to defend anyone else's position, merely your own.
I don't need to concern myself with random statements you find online. You and Boutons can fellate each other over these until you die of old age.
Make a statement of your own, or post something I said, or start a new thread (you're obviously about to anyhow, given how many you start a day).
Boiled down though: the shooter was killed by a civilian with a gun. Make all your tangential talking points from there. Don't matter.
Back to no takeWell it was fun while it lasted. Glad to know you’re for effective gun legislation!
I don't dance for you, boy. You dance for me.Back to no take
Retreat!
I have seen many gun advocates suggest that more guns everywhere will make people in general safer. Do you agree with that or not? Why or why not?
I haven't asked you to defend anything you didn't say.
I have asked you what your actual position is.
no-take meltdown.
RG: Some people say chocolate ice cream is the best flavor of ice cream. Do you agree? or think another flavor is better?
DMC: I never said about liking chocolate ice-cream, don't ask me to defend that statement.
Derp hiding his boot licking behind a sock puppet
Ah, the old, I won’t be pawed at when asked for you to provide an actual stance.
off...
You say so much without saying anything.
For someone who whines about the precision of words, you sure say a whole lotta nothing.
You say so much without saying anything.
For someone who whines about the precision of words, you sure say a whole lotta nothing.
Go ahead and explain what placebo legislation is in this case.
That's dmcs claim. You'll need to ask your hero on that one, dumb
So you don't know.
Placebo laws that ban cosmetic features so that liberals feel they have addressed the issue (because most liberals don't know a flash suppressor from a magazine).
Definition of assault weapon
Under the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, the definition of "assault weapon" included specific semi-automatic firearm models by name, and other semi-automatic firearms that possessed two or more from a set certain features:[14]
Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Bayonet mount
Flash hider or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
Grenade launcher
Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor
Barrel shroud safety feature that prevents burns to the operator
Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more
A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm.
Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Detachable magazine.
Manufacturers simply skirted those features so they did not have "two or more" of them, none of which would render the firearm less effective if removed. This did not prevent owners from adding these after purchase.
I don't care to do work for derp. I'm sure he doesn't really care about the work you did for him either.
Sure, you're just adept at the +1 contributions
Lol DMC still trying to play the "Sure, you're just adept at the +1 contributionswhat do you contribute here
Ehh, I don’t think he disliked the result given the current reality, that doesn’t mean, as you put it, that we shouldn’t strive for better. Even if slowly.
How do we “strive for better” ElNono? Can you provide some examples of potentially “effective” gun control legislation. DMC supports additional effective gun control legislation but he’s incapable of expressing an actual opinion on what that might entail. You seem to be a pretty straight shooter. What are your thoughts?
6 seconds
Don't mess with Texans
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
