Reply With Quote
Nah, Benghazi happened and people died under her watch. She didn't do about it.
If you've kept up with the goings on in Iraq lately, you'd know we didn't pick this fight. It was there already. Iran was growing more and more brazen. So first learn about the events then formulate your questions if the answers weren't presented in your research already.
Nah, Benghazi happened and people died under her watch. She didn't do about it.
No, it’s not a declaration of war with Iran and we’re not in a war against Iran except through the proxy war in Iraq that has been going on since 2003.
What was she supposed to do? Total fake scandal.
that little is just a pro-Trump talking points bot now.
my biggest fear is that a signal is issued and they poison all of the gas station burritos simultaneously.typical american war propaganda. The cities of LA, NYC and Boston have issued warnings to its citizens of possible terrorist attacks in response to the assasination.
when is the last time Iran commited a terrorist attack on US soil?
mstupid bas s forget most of the attacks were made by Saudi linked Sunnis like Al Qaeda and ISIS
dumb americans
did she order an assassination of a govt official?
no. Just American citizens from what I’ve read.
Mostly in and around the federal lockup while Epstein was inside.
Totally fake scandal and totally partisan smear.
You're asking me to decide on evidence presented by what I consider to be extremely dishonest groups of people for political gain.
No twitter acct but this is interesting
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
Follow Follow @hahussain
More
Bottom line is, Iraqi parliament vote was an Iranian face-saving measure. Iran is in a bind: If it retaliates without claiming its attack, it does not count as revenge for Soleimani. If Iran claims the attack, regime risks further wrath, in a country whose economy is in free fall
That settles it then.
Iran is ed yo. Raising that red flag to ask fellow poor Muslim countries to do their bull Jihadi thing. Thats about all they can do, nothing conventional since not only the USA but the whole world will on them. That's what you get for ing with the big bois
More
For non-Arabic speakers, reporting in the main news outlets NYT and Wash Post is so misinformed (either on purpose or because of incompetence) that you might think that the Iraqi State has officially voted for ejecting US forces from Iraq (because of Trump's miscalculated move
45 replies764 retweets1,127 likes
Reply 45 Retweet 764 Like 1.1K
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
7h7 hours ago
More
to kill Soleimani). What happened is different.
1- Iraqi PM Abdul-Mahdi sent a letter to Parliament in which he argued US troops exist in Iraq, not based on a treaty ratified by Parliament, but on 2 letters from past cabinets to the UN. Hence, Parliament has no role in ejection.
3 replies141 retweets316 likes
Reply 3 Retweet 141 Like 316
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
7h7 hours ago
More
2- Iraqi PM's trying to trade disarming Shia militias for limiting scope of US troops. He wrote: "Whoever wants to become a political power, has to surrender arms, join armed forces, and forgo any political allegiance (i.e. to Iran) other than to military and commander-in-chief."
3 replies121 retweets276 likes
Reply 3 Retweet 121 Like 276
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
7h7 hours ago
More
3- #Iraq parliament barely had a quorum for session on ejecting US troops. Sunni and Kurdish blocs boycotted the session (thus taking America's side over Iran), and thus quorum was 170 of 328 (half + 4, just like Hezbollah designated a PM in Lebanese parliament with half + 4)
4 replies145 retweets301 likes
Reply 4 Retweet 145 Like 301
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
7h7 hours ago
More
4- The text Iraqi Parliament voted on was not a legislation, but a non-binding resolution.
2 replies124 retweets279 likes
Reply 2 Retweet 124 Like 279
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
7h7 hours ago
More
5- To deflect Iranian anger, Abdul-Mahdi said US troops will leave, according to timetable. Troops of Assad dynasty occupied Lebanon for 29 years, with Assad and Lebanese saying withdrawal on its way, but tied to timetable. In Mid Eastern countries, timetables mean indefinitely
3 replies112 retweets286 likes
Reply 3 Retweet 112 Like 286
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
7h7 hours ago
More
6- In his letter to Parliament, Abdul-Mahdi clearly states that Iraqi interest is to maintain neutrality between America and Iran, and that if Iraq antagonizes America, it risks losing its international status (and implicitly oil revenue, just like Iran).
3 replies107 retweets245 likes
Reply 3 Retweet 107 Like 245
Hussain Abdul-Hussain ����
@hahussain
7h7 hours ago
More
7- NYT is, by far, much more pro-Iran than Wash Post. The post reported that "tens of thousands" mourned Soleimani in Ahwaz. NYT made the number of mourners "hundreds of thousands."
7 replies151 retweets298 likes
Reply 7 Retweet 151 Like 298
Cash that was stolen by the United States via sanctions? Giving them their stolen man back in return of them not building nukes is not a bad deal to me tbh
Jihadists are Sunni muslims. Iranians are Shia muslims. All the Saudis and ISIS arabs who are fighting against Asssad and Iran are Sunni muslims. God Damn you're so ing re ed.
The term jihadist is almost exclusively used to describe Sunni extremists. In Syria, where there are thousands of foreign Muslim fighters engaged in the civil war, for example, non-Syrian Shia are often referred to as "militia", and Sunni foreigners as "jihadists" (or "would-be jihadists").
Jihadism- Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihadism#Shia_jihad
OK.
Why did we take a quantum leap in hostilities?
You really pretend like you dont know what is going on.
So you are saying NO Shia muslims are terrorists?
Trump designated Iran’s Revolutionary Guards a Foreign Terrorist Group as an excuse to go in there and start doing regime change. The Zionists have been planning to invade Iran for more than 20 years. Trump is doing what a Zionist puppet would do.
But please tell me what are all the war crimes and terrorist attacks that Iranians have committed. Remember that ISIS and Jihadist are Sunnis. Also remember that Suleimani was an enemy of ISIS. So enlighten me. DMC maybe you know.
Al-Qaeda is also responsible for instigating sectarian violence among Muslims. Al-Qaeda's leaders regard liberal Muslims, Shias, Sufis and other sects as heretical and its members and sympathizers have attacked their mosques and gatherings.
Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia
Are you fckin kidding?
The Revolutionary Guard... you want me to keep going?
You are a complete nut.
You speak in such extremes, it's hard to take you seriously.
You'e the one asking stupid questions. You tell me what's going on since you obviously think you know.
Of course he is on the terrorist watch list AND we could have outed him long before this, how many times does this need to be repeated.You speak in such extremes, it's hard to take you seriously.
You'e the one asking stupid questions. You tell me what's going on since you obviously think you know.
Who did they kill and who did we kill? the latest...
Since Trump has shown such incredible benevolent behavior since we had sailors captured and drones shot down and he showed so much restraint.
They had swift boats all over Hormuz...
What happened to that benevolent restraint?
Yeah me talking in extremes. Our president asks a foreign country to investigate a political opponent on the fckin telephone and red team sees no harm. Wow was I harsh.
And now we know he held back funds trying to get that investigation. My horrible extremes that you dont want to see.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
