List the individual "war crime promises".
You're losing it, Qhris-- but going full neocon is a stressful transition for you....
List the individual "war crime promises".
Read your Dear Neocon Leader's tweet.
Can you do that?
List the individual "war crime promises".
Or fold.
Again.
cultural targets = war crimes
https://apnews.com/51ddb3630b257a686918c9610b31a50e
family separation, torturing children = Geneva convention violations
... and the Dems did nothing.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/01/05/...s-against-iranArticle 53 of Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions specifically prohibits any acts of hostility against cultural objects, including making such objects the target of reprisals. The US Law of War Manual (2016), which has extensive provisions relating to the protection of cultural property, incorporates this provision into US law
(Most of the Geneva Conventions were previously incorporated into US law as a treaty -- law of the land under the US Cons ution.)
Pompeo clearly dismissed any concern about war crime hypotheticals from Legacy Media and Spurstalk troll accounts.
I'm going by what the guy who orders these strikes said.
Nothing Pompeo said changes any of that.
You're going by whatever NYT and WaPo tells you to go by.
Nothing said by Trump or Pompeo will change any of that.
AOC/Nancy/Schiff/Schumer make great repeaters and serve as a credible source for today's Democrat.
I'm going by what Trump says himself, Qhris.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/05/u...ral-sites.html
If you need a source more suited to your neocon warmonger tastes, let me know.
Trash said he'd bomb cultural sites (war crime)
Pence said no, didn't say that
Trash REPEATS that he'd bomb cultural sites.
Qhris is gathering himself for a backflip as we speak.
Hard to believe that Pompeo's denial of what Trump said is believable -- Trump repeated himself later.
It's hilarious how often Trump wrecks damage control by doubling down.
How many search windows does Qhris have open now?
det change of subject
Good . Tell the US to GTFO of Iraq.
So it's 52 because that's how many hostages there were? That's a weird way to come up with targets.
It's the kind of symbolism terrorists use tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)