trump impeachment watch thread

[Thread]

I haven't seen you celebrate much tbh.

He didn't come as unscathed as I thought he would, Dumps.

I'm a bit alarmed because he didn't fight last night to have it end before SoU, just accepted Wednesday.

I fear it's not over,,,& I'm not talking about the Election, more like imminently.

[Spurminator]

He says about a 400 page thread the left created.

Now it's meaningless... now.

When did I say it was meaningless? Where in my post do you see the word "meaningless" or anything implying meaninglessness?

This is very meaningful.
"thread the left created"

[MultiTroll]

Rumpy not wearing the L well.

51-49
Trump president, not Nancy.

[DMC]

The result was never in question. It was always about math, never about merit. And yet you still have losers like TSA and Darrin celebrating like they won something that wasn't already predetermined. I'm trying to imagine having such an empty meaningless existence that something like this would give me joy, but that's a tough one. You guys are just sad.

The GOP, meanwhile, has shown itself to be not only completely predictable but totally gutless. It's the kind of thing that should cause a party to be voted into Oblivion, but fortunately for them they have the two party duopoly and voter supression keeping them relevant for the time being.

When did I say it was meaningless? Where in my post do you see the word "meaningless" or anything implying meaninglessness?

This is very meaningful.
"thread the left created"

It was meaningful for 399 pages then suddenly it wasn't. How did we get 400 pages of discussion about a predetermined outcome?

[spurraider21]

Seriously, where are you getting all these horrible nicknames and memes?

I'm embarrassed for you.

probably from 'liking' Hillary For Prison 2016 on facebook or something

[spurraider21]

Mult

Boiled down:::

Trump and Clinton stand shoulder to shoulder as the only duly elected Presidents to ever be impeached.

[Spurminator]

It was meaningful for 399 pages then suddenly it wasn't. How did we get 400 pages of discussion about a predetermined outcome?

Yes, I did say meaningless when describing your existences.

You still don't get it. The process has never been meaningless. The President is on trial and his jury voted down partisan lines against the will of 75% of the country to prevent key testimony.

Saying it was never in doubt isn't the same as saying it's meaningless. And to that end, it warrants discussion in threads like this.

I'm not sure what's so difficult about this but it's another example of you putting words into someone's mouth so you can argue against that instead of what they actually said. You should stop that.

[spurraider21]

It was meaningful for 399 pages then suddenly it wasn't. How did we get 400 pages of discussion about a predetermined outcome?

a sitting president getting impeached is always meaningful. doesn't happen all that often.

that doesn't change just because we knew all along the GOP senators would bury it as soon as they could

[DMC]

Boiled down:::

Trump and Clinton stand shoulder to shoulder as the only duly elected Presidents to ever be impeached.

At least Clinton got a blowjob out of it.

[DMC]

a sitting president getting impeached is always meaningful. doesn't happen all that often.

that doesn't change just because we knew all along the GOP senators would bury it as soon as they could

Meaningless is meaningless, or is your meaningless better than mine?

[spurraider21]

Meaningless is meaningless, or is your meaningless better than mine?

it was never meaningless

[DMC]

it was never meaningless

So it wasn't meaningless but it was predetermined, so the thread about a predetermined outcome has merit, but TSA and Darrin acting like they won something is silly (because it's meaningless)

So one of you says something stupid and the other tries the slight of hand trick to redirect incoming fire?

[boutons_deux]

+ Six years ago, Rand Paul received the Pillar Human Rights award from a whistleblower advocacy group.

On Thursday, he publicly revealed the name of the alleged whistleblower in the Ukraine scandal.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/01...f-the-century/

[boutons_deux]

Joke heard this morning at Belle’s Bakery and Cafe in Studio City:

Trump could shoot someone in the Senate and still get acquitted 53-47.

Unless he shot a Republican, then it would be 52-47.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/01/31/the-steal-of-the-century/

[Winehole23]

He says about a 400 page thread the left created.

Now it's meaningless... now.

Hardly meaningless, the GOP now owns and participates in DJT's corruption of government.

[ChumpDumper]

Rumpy not wearing the L well.

51-49
Trump president, not Nancy.

proud of being afraid of witnesses

What innocent party does that?

[ChumpDumper]

So it wasn't meaningless but it was predetermined, so the thread about a predetermined outcome has merit, but TSA and Darrin acting like they won something is silly (because it's meaningless)

So one of you says something stupid and the other tries the slight of hand trick to redirect incoming fire?

you don't think any president should be impeached for anything

[Spurminator]

So it wasn't meaningless but it was predetermined, so the thread about a predetermined outcome has merit, but TSA and Darrin acting like they won something is silly

Yes. And this line of argument from you is somehow sillier. Discussion throughout a Presidential impeachment with a predestined partisan outcome has great importance because it illustrates the ridiculousness of the outcome. What you're suggesting I believe is that we shouldn't pay attention to the impeachment proceedings because they're meaningless and the outcome is predictable. Couldn't be further from what I believe.

Hey DMC, do you think the Senate should have called witnesses?

[ChumpDumper]

Yes. And this line of argument from you is somehow sillier.

Hey DMC, do you think the Senate should have called witnesses?

Oh man, let the dodging commence.

[Winehole23]

Dem Bidens, though

[koriwhat]

[DMC]

Hardly meaningless, the GOP now owns and participates in DJT's corruption of government.

That narrative and 2.50 will buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

[DMC]

Yes. And this line of argument from you is somehow sillier. Discussion throughout a Presidential impeachment with a predestined partisan outcome has great importance because it illustrates the ridiculousness of the outcome. What you're suggesting I believe is that we shouldn't pay attention to the impeachment proceedings because they're meaningless and the outcome is predictable. Couldn't be further from what I believe.

Hey DMC, do you think the Senate should have called witnesses?

So Darrin and TSA gloating about an outcome they preferred is meaningless because everyone knew it was going to happen, but then if everyone knew, what's the point of a 400 page discussion? Oh that's right, the left took their victory laps prematurely. The band was on the field a bit early.

I think the dems tried to strongarm the process in the House just to bow up with no teeth to actually bite. Then they proclaim the importance of the impeachment as if it somehow does a single ing thing but add a Wiki note. "Asterisk" lodged never meant anything in reality. A ring is a ring.

But it's still not over. Saying it's predetermined basically s on any gains you think the left made here.

[ChumpDumper]

So Darrin and TSA gloating about an outcome they preferred is meaningless because everyone knew it was going to happen, but then if everyone knew, what's the point of a 400 page discussion?

What is the point of any discussion?

[DMC]

What is the point of any discussion?

Here? To win tiny w's obviously.