NBA Trade Deadline 2020

[ZeusWillJudge]

Your post doesn't hit the mark as they traded Hill for Ben Wallace and Chucky Atkins. Wallace was considered a marginal player. They coul have easily gotten those players with or without Hill.

LMAO. First you argue how wise the Pistons were for trading superstar Grant Hill for those guys, then you turn right around and say they could have easily gotten those same players without trading superstar Grant Hill for them?

You don't even have an argument. Just say whatever is convenient.

[TimDunkem]

DrewShow would be the worst GM. LMA/DD for capspace (which we could have if we let these pieces walk) and one first?

Vomit.

[look_at_g_shred]

NY shopping Knox. I could see the knicks having interest in DDR.

[ZeusWillJudge]

No mention of the Knicks, Hornets, Bulls, Cavs, Pistons, and Twolves. How many lotteries do they need for things to finally work out?

So you're saying that the problem with those teams is that they got lottery picks? Well there's a bright lad.

There's no cure for dumbass. In NBA front offices, or on message boards.

[TimDunkem]

Celts did well for themselves after stockpiling picks.

[RC_Drunkford]

Spurs won't do . Flopovich thinks once the players understand his overrated system they will win more games

[ZeusWillJudge]

Spurs won't do . Flopovich thinks once the players understand his overrated system they will win more games

"These guys just aren't pounding the rock."

[spurspl]

NY shopping Knox. I could see the knicks having interest in DDR.

source?

ddr and 2nd pick for randle and knox would be fine ��

[RC_Drunkford]

Spurs will never deal with the Knicks after what happened with Marcus Morris

[look_at_g_shred]

source?

ddr and 2nd pick for randle and knox would be fine ��

https://clutchpoints.com/nba-trade-r...strong-enough/

[spurspl]

Spurs will never deal with the Knicks after what happened with Marcus Morris

probably yes. Thats annoying bc when u do business ur emotions should be hiden. U just take the best deal u can get. The same thing was about kawhis trade. Spurs could get much better return but all they wanna was to do what kawhi did not want to. One of the reasons why patfo suck

[look_at_g_shred]

Spurs will never deal with the Knicks after what happened with Marcus Morris

If you can get knox on the cheap, you do it tbh

[emanueldavidginobili]

[TimDunkem]

probably yes. Thats annoying bc when u do business ur emotions should be hiden. U just take the best deal u can get. The same thing was about kawhis trade. Spurs could get much better return but all they wanna was to do what kawhi did not want to. One of the reasons why patfo suck

It's the reason why they sent him to NBA Siberia.

That blew up in their faces, didn't it?

[DPG21920]

If the Spurs are serious about winning, Forbes, Beli, Rudy and Carroll all need to be moved and they need to upgrade the roster around DeRozan/LMA. i don’t agree with giving up picks or the youth to do that, but if they believe that then they need to do it.

But this roster needs a lot of reshaping if winning is truly a goal.

[RC_Drunkford]

If you can get knox on the cheap, you do it tbh

I agree, but the Knicks would never send him to San Antonio and the Spurs would never deal with the Knicks

[tbdog]

So you're saying that the problem with those teams is that they got lottery picks? Well there's a bright lad.

There's no cure for dumbass. In NBA front offices, or on message boards.

It means, tanking does not guarantee success. Usually you tank for a few years to be in the same situation we are in now.

[DPG21920]

It means, tanking does not guarantee success. Usually you tank for a few years to be in the same situation we are in now.

Which means no harm no foul then. This type of place ( a losing record team) isn’t a big accomplishment and winning 20 games vs 35 really doesn’t matter.

[spurs1990]

Your post doesn't hit the mark as they traded Hill for Ben Wallace and Chucky Atkins. Wallace was considered a marginal player. They coul have easily gotten those players with or without Hill.

You will recall Hill signed with Orlando as a free agent. The S&T was for cap purposes to get McGrady and Tim Duncan that summer. Detroit benefited by getting a couple players back as well

[exstatic]

You will recall Hill signed with Orlando as a free agent. The S&T was for cap purposes to get McGrady and Tim Duncan that summer. Detroit benefited by getting a couple players back as well

It was never going to be McGrady and Duncan. McGrady was their soft landing after Tim stiffed them.

[tbdog]

Which means no harm no foul then. This type of place ( a losing record team) isn’t a big accomplishment and winning 20 games vs 35 really doesn’t matter.

For this season, sure. Then DD walks. Losing mentality sets in. You then ride the lottery to be in the same position as last season. Maybe.

[tbdog]

It was never going to be McGrady and Duncan. McGrady was their soft landing after Tim stiffed them.

McGrady was coming for cheaper. Once TD rejected magic offer, they just offered McGrady a bigger contract.

[Chillen]

Imagine the rings Tmac would have if he joined Tim in San Antonio on a cheaper contract in 2000. Spurs would also have Tony and Manu on the way. Prime Tmac was amazing. It would have been the big 4 instead of the big 3.

[spurspl]

Imagine the rings Tmac would have if he joined Tim in San Antonio on a cheaper contract in 2000. Spurs would also have Tony and Manu on the way. Prime Tmac was amazing. It would have been the big 4 instead of the big 3.

now we have also a big4: lma ddr forbes and beli

[DPG21920]

For this season, sure. Then DD walks. Losing mentality sets in. You then ride the lottery to be in the same position as last season. Maybe.

You mean that same losing mentality with DeRozan like we have now where they aren’t on track to even have a winning record despite being fully healthy? That losing mentality?