Dem debate tonight

[CosmicCowboy]

Like all the people and companies moving to Texas from California?

[Thread]

true, and still is, but that's hardly the point of the article.

anyway, Paul Street's "butthurt" is fringe, will have no effect on Dem voters.

iow, America is ed and un able beyond doubt

if dementia victim Biden runs against dementia victim Trash.

Biden is still ahead nationally, but if he loses, again badly, in NH, I don't think he and his team can deliver The Comeback Kid.

Then the DNC will support Buttigieg as establishment corporate/capitalist toy who has NO financial/economic policies that would bother the oligarchy.

America won't elect a " got", so that means Trash wins 2020.

The only hope is that the Dems take the Senate,

or Moscow Mitch will totally destroy the Federal judiciary, including replacing Notorious RBG with another Gorsuch/Kavanaugh oligarchy , SCOTUS s 6-3 for decades,

while the Repugs continue to destroy the Exec branch agencies with "acting" managers, directors.

Paul Street is naive to think that the Trash/Repug cult mob of "42%" will wake up or accept defeat.

The only solution is violent revolution that is way beyond fatass, teevee watching Americans.

More likely will be continued domestic terrorism from DHS, the police state, and less KKK militia men, with the Christian supremacist evangelical Reconstructionists remaining silent during the mayhem as part of End Times.

You'd imagine such, but, she's liable to last the additional 4 years. Wouldn't surprise me an iota.

, she's out there lifting weights.

[CosmicCowboy]

You'd imagine such, but, she's liable to last the additional 4 years. Wouldn't surprise me an iota.

, she's out there lifting weights.

She will send herself to a taxidermist to be stuffed in her chair before she let's a republican president replace her.

[spurraider21]

Yes, the cons ution allows for amendments which have to be approved by 2/3 in both houses of Congress and then 3/4 of the states. Joseph er says hi.

cool. i never said it can be done with a 50% vote. glad we agree

now, can you justify why it makes sense for the minority to govern the majority as long as they are spread out geographically?

[CosmicCowboy]

I dont have to justify it. It's the US cons ution.

[spurraider21]

can you justify why it makes sense for the minority to govern the majority as long as they are spread out geographically?

I dont have to justify it. It's the US cons ution.

pussy

nobody here "has" to justify or support anything they say. i'm asking if you can. if you cant and it comes down to "my team has benefitted from it recently" then just say so.

[CosmicCowboy]

pussy

nobody here "has" to justify or support anything they say. i'm asking if you can. if you cant and it comes down to "my team has benefitted from it recently" then just say so.

Lol. Suck a . Move to another country if you dont like it. It was specifically written to prevent a few urban centers from being able to discriminate against the rest of the country.

[ChumpDumper]

Mainly to preserve slavery.

[spurraider21]

Lol. Suck a . Move to another country if you dont like it. It was specifically written to prevent a few urban centers from being able to discriminate against the rest of the country.

ok, so you cant justify the concept of a minority of people governing over the majority just because they live farther apart from one another. of course, you dont have to justify it. its just nice to know you cant

got it

[CosmicCowboy]

ok, so you cant justify the concept of a minority of people governing over the majority just because they live farther apart from one another. of course, you dont have to justify it. its just nice to know you cant

got it

You are one stupid . Wa Wa Wa. Life is unfair. WA Wa Wa.

[spurraider21]

You are one stupid . Wa Wa Wa. Life is unfair. WA Wa Wa.

all i wanted to know is if you can justify it. i didnt think you'd be able to. you didn't disappoint. now you're upset about it. that does disappoint. i didnt take you as sensitive

[CosmicCowboy]

Will you please justify why gravity is unfair? It's clearly unfair to fat asses like you.

[spurraider21]

Will you please justify why gravity is unfair? It's clearly unfair to fat asses like you.

even derp's meltdowns are more gracious

[Spurtacular]

pussy

nobody here "has" to justify or support anything they say. i'm asking if you can. if you cant and it comes down to "my team has benefitted from it recently" then just say so.

ok, so you cant justify the concept of a minority of people governing over the majority just because they live farther apart from one another. of course, you dont have to justify it. its just nice to know you cant

got it

even derp's meltdowns are more gracious

All this lashing out because CC hit you with kill shots.

Good luck getting 2/3 to ratify the "let three states run the country" amendment.

Damn you are stupid. Yes, the cons ution allows for amendments which have to be approved by 2/3 in both houses of Congress and then 3/4 of the states. Joseph er says hi.

I dont have to justify it. It's the US cons ution.

Rent free

[CosmicCowboy]

Just pointing out that whining about the senate and the EC makes just as much sense as whining about gravity.

[spurraider21]

Just pointing out that whining about the senate and the EC makes just as much sense as whining about gravity.

Does whining about slavery make about as much sense too?

and regardless of what you think about the feasibility of changing it, do you think the EC which allows for minority rule is a better and more fair system than a popular vote?

[Spurtacular]

Does whining about slavery make about as much sense too?

and regardless of what you think about the feasibility of changing it, do you think the EC which allows for minority rule is a better and more fair system than a popular vote?

"Minority rule"

You don't even give a sh** about the majority having to pay for illegals and leaches right now. You weren't crying when activist judges struck down 187 in Cali.

Your schtick is sad, Lite.

[spurraider21]

"Minority rule"

how else do you describe it when the side with less votes wins?

You don't even give a sh** about the majority having to pay for illegals and leaches right now. You weren't crying when activist judges struck down 187 in Cali.

Your schtick is sad, Lite.

187 had nothing to do with majority/minority derp. The measure passed. It was just uncons utional.

Activist judge is just code for judge who’s decision you disagree with politically

[Spurtacular]

how else do you describe it when the side with less votes wins?

I describe it as we're a republic. I don't get to pick 434 of 435 Congressmen and 98 of 100 Senators. Same pretty much goes for everyone else. I get to pick 0 of 9 Supreme Court justices. The list goes on....

[Spurtacular]

187 had nothing to do with majority/minority derp. The measure passed. It was just uncons utional.

Activist judge is just code for judge who’s decision you disagree with politically

Really. Cos I found nothing in the California Consitution that said we have to give a sh**load of free services to illegals.

Activist judges are minority rule. This has been the Democrats game for decades. Your tears are bull sh**.

[spurraider21]

Really. Cos I found nothing in the California Consitution that said we have to give a sh**load of free services to illegals.

Activist judges are minority rule. This has been the Democrats game for decades. Your tears are bull sh**.

It was against the US cons ution not the CA cons ution. Federal court struck it down

[Spurtacular]

It was against the US cons ution not the CA cons ution. Federal court struck it down

Yea, I found nothing in either Cons ution, Lite.

You've been doing minority rule all along.

[spurraider21]

Yea, I found nothing in either Cons ution, Lite.

and you’re not a judge

it infringed on feds ability to regulate immigration and was preempted by existing federal law on welfare benefits

You've been doing minority rule all along.

no. The judiciary is an equal branch of government

[Spurtacular]

and you’re not a judge

it infringed on feds ability to regulate immigration and was preempted by existing federal law on welfare benefits


no. The judiciary is an equal branch of government

Bull it infringed on their ability.

Like I said, you've been doing minority rule this whole time. Your contention that we need majority rule is a facade.

[CosmicCowboy]

Does whining about slavery make about as much sense too?

and regardless of what you think about the feasibility of changing it, do you think the EC which allows for minority rule is a better and more fair system than a popular vote?

The 14th amendment pretty much set that slavery strawman on fire.