Reply With Quote
Already answered.
Was Stone’s recommended sentence excessive compared to what felony liar leaker Wolfe got?
Manifestly unjust according to TechnF
Already answered.
Was Stone’s recommended sentence excessive compared to what felony liar leaker Wolfe got?
that's not answering my question at all
do you think they're resigning out of fear? shame?
The prosecution recommended two years for Wolfe after he pleaded guilty to one charge, rube.
Stone was found guilty on seven counts after a trial.
If they did in fact brief DOJ completely different than what they actually recommended then they planned this for the media narrative that is currently playing out now. The Mueller boys are still butthurt and looking for media gigs just like Weissman landed.
You didn’t answer my question at all.
Was Stone’s recommended sentence excessive compared to what felony liar leaker Wolfe got?
i told you im not that familiar with this case so i don't know.
so your story is they are resigning because they just want media gigs and are done being lawyers?
Compare the charges, rube.
Wolfe: one felony count of lying to investigators (pleaded guilty)
Stone: five felony counts of lying to investigators, one count of obstructing a congressional probe and one count of witness tampering (trial verdict)
You're seriously trying to say they're the same thing.
I said I think they are resigning to create the media narrative currently being pushed. If they did in fact lie to DOJ in their brief about what they were going to recommend what other motive/outcome can you come up with?
just checking in to see how many days in jail he's has spent so far.
Prosecution said they were okay with probation so just waiting for judge to sentence. “major trouble probation”
This news makes things all the more interesting.
Prosecution said they were okay with probation so just waiting for judge to sentence. “major trouble probation”
imagine quitting your job just for the purpose of pushing a media narrative
yep, Trash blocking a Stone prosecutor from career advancement to protect his corrupt ass
You didn’t answer my question at all, and only 1 of 4 quit their job.
If they did in fact lie to DOJ in their brief about what they were going to recommend what other motive/outcome can you come up with?
Should the law be the president's plaything?
that would explain them getting fired.
None of them got fired.
You didn’t answer my question at all, and only 1 of 4 quit their job.
If they did in fact lie to DOJ in their brief about what they were going to recommend what other motive/outcome can you come up with? Why lie in the briefing and then go and recommend an excessive amount of time while most likely expecting/wanting a rebuke from DOJ if not to get this in the media to push a narrative?
i dno. it would be pretty weird to lie to my boss at the risk of getting disciplined/fired just for a media narrative
What reasons can you think of to lie to DOJ in briefing and turn around opposite your brief and recommend an excessive amount of time?
We all know - if his lips are moving - he is ing lying -
but we REALLY know he is lying when he denies doing something...
and then follows that with: "if I wanted to - I have the right to..."
meaning -
in a few days or weeks - we will see the actual proof/memo/email/text/ny times article -
that yes indeed - he did it and the call or email was exposed...
ing lying piece of criminal -sucker traitor
cant think of any, considering the DOJ is going to see the recommendation. not like they can sneak that by
Why do you think these people lied to DOJ? Why do you think these people resigned?
i think there's probably more to the story than "they lied to the DOJ knowing that they were going to make a different recommendation (which the DOJ can overrule anyway) just as part of their grand plan to withdraw from the case and/or resign
we'll probably learn more
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
