I would say that a campaign manager giving data to a known intelligence asset qualifies. But then, I actually read the report.
Didn't appear to be much beyond that, but that in and of itself should be enough, IMO, to reach the conclusion that "yes, collusion happened"
aw. you want to keep deflecting. I get it. Maybe for an encore you will tell me how a few hundred votes in a special election in Kenucky is somehow a meaningful trend.
Tell me, did Mueller indicate that he thought he got all the evidence he could about this? Or did he note some limitations on what he could get?
You left those qualifiers out, because you want to lie through cherry-picking.
A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.
...
Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated — including some associated with the Trump Campaign — deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.
Why have Trash and his mafiya, for 3 years, been lying, "forgetting", hiding, obstructing their connections to Russians from any and all investigations?
Why did Trash hire some many people with deep histories with Russia?
Will Trump Be Meeting With His Counterpart — Or His Handler?
A plausible theory of mind-boggling collusion.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/07/trump-putin-russia-collusion.html
aw. you want to keep deflecting. I get it. Maybe for an encore you will tell me how a few hundred votes in a special election in Kenucky is somehow a meaningful trend.
Tell me, did Mueller indicate that he thought he got all the evidence he could about this? Or did he note some limitations on what he could get?
You left those qualifiers out, because you want to lie through cherry-picking.incompetent Mueller the liar
1. "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
2. "The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."
3. "The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."
4. "The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."
5. "The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."
6. "The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or cons uted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."
7. "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_pickingCherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is the confirmation bias.[1][2] Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. This fallacy is a major problem in public debate
Anti-Vaxxers Are Terrified the Government Will ‘Enforce’ a Vaccine for Coronavirus
Anti-vax groups on social media are claiming that
the spread of the disease will lead to
mandatory vaccinations and
'unlimited surveillance.'
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/m7q5vv/anti-vaxxers-are-terrified-the-government-will-enforce-a-vaccine-for-coronavirus?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&u tm_campaign=curated_vice_daily_1023202
As USA is bullied into an authoritarian theocracy, a authoritarian theocracy shows its competence
HOW IRAN BECAME A NEW EPICENTER OF THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK
Harirchi dismissed as hype an Iranian lawmaker’s claim that
fifty people had already died from covid-19.
“I will resign if the numbers are even half or a quarter of this,”
Iran opposed quarantines,
he said, because they belonged to an era before the First World War—
“to the plague, cholera, stuff like that.”
The next day, Harirchi confirmed in a video—from quarantine—that he had contracted coronavirus.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-c...term=TNY_Daily
It Is Written.
Allah Wills It
Mulvaney laying down the narrative at CPAC: coverage of the pandemic is an attempt by the biased media to hurt the stock market and take down DJT.
^ doing his best Iranian leader impression I see
hope he gets the virus over the weekend like those Iranian leaders did
Trump hadn't slept for at least 'a day and a half' before his coronavirus press conference
Mulvaney while speaking at Friday's Conservative Political Action Conference declared that
the president basically "never sleeps,"
having apparently barely done so before addressing the nation about the coronavirus crisis earlier this week.
Although Mulvaney chalked up Trump's wacky sleep schedule to
his desire to get the most out of his time in office,
https://theweek.com/speedreads/899055/trump-hadnt-slept-least-day-half-before-coronavirus-press-conference-mick-mulvaney-says
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-28-2020 at 06:46 PM.
You know what would make Americans safer?
How about an emergency tax cut?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...irus-tax-cuts/
This is not true. CDC developed test and open sourced it. A number of other countries developed tests. They all have accuracy problems. CDC first batch shipped was bad because of a bad batch of chemicals, that's what caused the delay.
https://www.who.int/emergencies/dise...atory-guidance
but Trump
everything is trump's fault in the eyes of the loser dems.
on a side note, they're all spineless pathetic losers who never take accountability for their own downfalls and would rather claim orange man bad time and time again.
Thought you were a "my body my choice" type tbh
FYI Dems have been pushing the lie that Trump cut the CDC budget and that's why we can't handle this. That's a lie.
There is a lot of narratives about Trump failing with this virus but every country is failing because nobody can handle this virus. This will continue to spread all over the world.
Last edited by Nathan89; 02-28-2020 at 04:54 PM.
Go point by point and list all of the significant portions of related data that contradicts the below positions.Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is the confirmation bias.[1][2] Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. This fallacy is a major problem in public debate
1. "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
2. "The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."
3. "The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."
4. "The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."
5. "The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."
6. "The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or cons uted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."
7. "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."
Last edited by RandomGuy; 02-28-2020 at 06:32 PM.
Ain't no one saying "we can't handle this because of budget cuts. That is itself a lie. Not that I expect you to be able to tell the difference in truth and lies these days.
They are pointing out that Trump cut the budget for the agency responsible for preparing for and dealing with these things.
hopefully all of china and iran fall to their knees in a cold sweat. both those countries equally!
He also never s, right?Trump hadn't slept for at least 'a day and a half' before his coronavirus press conference
Mulvaney while speaking at Friday's Conservative Political Action Conference declared that
the president basically "never sleeps,"
having apparently barely done so before addressing the nation about the coronavirus crisis earlier this week.
Although Mulvaney chalked up Trump's wacky sleep schedule to
his desire to get the most out of his time in office,
Dang. You got me there. I did not know they were saying that. Already voted in the primary, so I tuned out of it a couple of weeks ago. It has been blissful.Ain't no one saying "we can't handle this because of budget cuts. That is itself a lie. Not that I expect you to be able to tell the difference in truth and lies these days.
They are pointing out that Trump cut the budget for the agency responsible for preparing for and dealing with these things.
They are wrong, and the fact check is correct. It is a distortion.
Repug / oligarchy tax cuts are like alcohol: drink to commiserate, drink to celebrate
No matter how good or bad it is, T A X C U T S !!!
Trump DID propose cuts to the CDC and NIH.
The cuts did not take place.
Would these cuts have affected our response? I dunno...
So are you thanking Congress Nathan?
Trump did not create this mess but he is the last person I trust to handle it wisely. It would be rough on any president however.
So Step away and shut up. Let Mike comment now.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
