Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29
  1. #1
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    We can't have Medicare for All because white people don't want to pay for black health care

    UBI has the same problem

  3. #3
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Pelicans
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    15,822
    It will help Syria when she joins Assad’s cabinet.

  4. #4
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    $1.5 trillion to the banks yesterday... that would have paid for this UBI for 4.5 months.

  5. #5
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321

  6. #6
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    derp is going to love socialism now

  7. #7
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,025
    So what's the probable size of the subsidy?

  8. #8
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    Good kickoff for her third party run for president.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Fed has been pumping $10Bs into the repo market for months. Why?

    and now the health crisis hits.

  10. #10
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    It's the priorities Teysha, and the sheer amount. It doesn't matter if it's short term, long term, the liquidity is as good as money in our system.

    Like I was saying earlier, an actual National Emergency releases $50 billion for the entire population, but if the banks are hurting, there's a 1.5 T insta-bailout? Are the banks really leveraged that badly in debt? Shouldn't we be doing something about it?

    How about the small-medium business owner? He's going to have to go to the bank and the bank is going to take a cut, why not cut the middle-man there? It's an exceptional time, an emergency.

  11. #11
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    derp is going to love socialism now
    Lite lashing out cos he doesn't want common sense socialism when it's needed the most.

  12. #12
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    derp wants socialism because tulsi said so

    surprised it didnt even take a sweaty workout video

  13. #13
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    derp wants socialism because tulsi said so

    surprised it didnt even take a sweaty workout video
    Stop lashing out, Lite. What exactly do you have against her proposal?

  14. #14
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,025
    Derp sez: it's common sense socialism.

    It ain't worker control of the means of production, but in this case, I agree with him.

  15. #15
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    It's the priorities Teysha, and the sheer amount. It doesn't matter if it's short term, long term, the liquidity is as good as money in our system.

    Like I was saying earlier, an actual National Emergency releases $50 billion for the entire population, but if the banks are hurting, there's a 1.5 T insta-bailout? Are the banks really leveraged that badly in debt? Shouldn't we be doing something about it?

    How about the small-medium business owner? He's going to have to go to the bank and the bank is going to take a cut, why not cut the middle-man there? It's an exceptional time, an emergency.
    As I understood the article, it was more about shoring up treasuries...which the banks, among others, use as debt leverage. The spectre of another 2008 recession/meltdown is certainly especially dangerous to small/med business and indavidual consumers when credit disappears.

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    As I understood the article, it was more about shoring up treasuries...which the banks, among others, use as debt leverage. The spectre of another 2008 recession/meltdown is certainly especially dangerous to small/med business and indavidual consumers when credit disappears.
    yep, 2008 was called "repo crisis", credit unavailable, so it's worrying that Fed has been already deep into the repo cash flow since September?

  17. #17
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,025
    As I understood the article, it was more about shoring up treasuries...which the banks, among others, use as debt leverage. The spectre of another 2008 recession/meltdown is certainly especially dangerous to small/med business and indavidual consumers when credit disappears.
    During the 2008-9 panic you argued for front-loaded stimulus, straight up checks to ordinary folks.

    Any reason that wouldn't be appropriate now? I get that the Fed is taking its lender of last resort responsibility seriously, but like El Nono said, if measures like this are necessary to avoid systemic financial.collapse, direct, robust fiscal stimulus belongs in the conversation too.

  18. #18
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    yep, 2008 was called "repo crisis", credit unavailable, so it's worrying that Fed has been already deep into the repo cash flow since September?
    Yeah. That's definitely a concern. I need to study that angle next.

  19. #19
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    During the 2008-9 panic you argued for front-loaded stimulus, stright up checks to ordinary folks.

    Any reason that wouldn't be appropriate now? I get that the Fed is taking its lender of last resort reaponsibility seriously, but like El Nono said, if measures like thisnare necessary, robust fiscal stimulus belongs in the conversation too.
    Oh, my argument for a front loaded stimulus package is still valid and I'm still a fan.

  20. #20
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Stop lashing out, Lite. What exactly do you have against her proposal?
    not much tbh. i think there should be UBI for everybody earning under a certain amount (or in the alternative, have the minimum wage be a living wage).

    its just hilarious how left wing you become just because tulsi says it.

  21. #21
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    not much tbh. i think there should be UBI for everybody earning under a certain amount (or in the alternative, have the minimum wage be a living wage).

    its just hilarious how left wing you become just because tulsi says it.
    You means test UBI and you're never getting it through in this crisis. It has zero chance happening if you deny it to the middle class. Just view it as a temporary subsistence level income for the poor as our economy is about to be trashed and temporary stimulus for everyone else to try to prop the economy back up. Just keep it simple like Tulsi is proposing.

  22. #22
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    You means test UBI and you're never getting it through in this crisis. It has zero chance happening if you deny it to the middle class. Just view it as a temporary subsistence level income for the poor as our economy is about to be trashed and temporary stimulus for everyone else to try to prop the economy back up. Just keep it simple like Tulsi is proposing.
    i agree with that

    i was speaking on a more broad, long term approach

  23. #23
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    i agree with that

    i was speaking on a more broad, long term approach
    It's not time for a long term approach IMO, all that matters right now is minimizing deaths in this pandemic. And I think it is very possible if we're on the brink of a crippling recession and when we see a huge gain in corona positive Americans soon. Bush did it on a smaller scale 12 years ago and this is a crisis orders of magnitude worse than the 2008 crash.
    Last edited by baseline bum; 03-13-2020 at 09:02 PM.

  24. #24
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    It's not time for a long term approach IMO, all that matters right now is minimizing deaths in this pandemic. And I think it is very possible if we're on the brink of a crippling recession and when we see a huge gain in corona positive Americans soon. Bush did it on a smaller scale 12 years ago and this is a crisis orders of magnitude worse than the 2008 crash.
    man, i forgot about those stimulus checks

  25. #25
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    As I understood the article, it was more about shoring up treasuries...which the banks, among others, use as debt leverage. The spectre of another 2008 recession/meltdown is certainly especially dangerous to small/med business and indavidual consumers when credit disappears.
    Yup, it's federal money backstopping banks' liquidity. I understand that's important we don't add a financial crisis on top of the current crisis. However, I'm disgusted with the fact that I don't see similar help for the population at large, not from the government, nor the private sector (which will make good use of that federal money to make more money in this time of crisis).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •