150. I don't have any superpowers, but I am better at math than you are.
"a" variable to the log of x for the win.
You can find that and not your blithe comparisons to the common flu last week,
Content to speak out both sides of your mouth, I see.
150. I don't have any superpowers, but I am better at math than you are.
"a" variable to the log of x for the win.
Over 8k for the flu.
150 for Corona.
The fact remains:::
Over 8k deaths due to flu.
150 deaths due to Corona.
This stupid schtik is not going to age well...
It will till you got more than 8k of Corona, by God.
Well ok then. You go with your bad self. When that changes, I expect you to own that.
https://www.thelocal.it/20200123/flu...down-in-a-weekSince the start of flu season in October 2019, 2,768,000 cases across the country have been confirmed by laboratory tests, according to data from InfluNet published on January 19.
A total of 488,000 cases were reported last week alone, signalling that flu season is hitting its peak in January as predicted.
240 deaths have so far been reported, slightly lower than the expected 258. Most of the fatal cases are elderly patients who suffered complications after contracting the virus.
6 months of data on the flu: 240 deaths.
2 months of data on COVID-19 from the link in the OP: 3k deaths.
Italy on track several weeks ahead of the US. No reason to think the US is really any different.
That you are too stupid to think this is a good point, says all I need to know.
Minimizing this, when all the experts are telling you it is going to be bad, makes you a ing idiot.
Morally and intellectually bankrupt.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 03-19-2020 at 09:39 AM. Reason: double checking shit.
So baseless accusations good now.
Wouldn't have to be 80k? That's the annual deaths from flu.
I'm using the 100k # used like it was nothing before Corona hit. If it was good before Corona, it's even better after Corona.
I always own my .
It's my religion.
The American hospital association estimates a .5% mortality rate and 96M infections in the next two months.
You, dumb, .
This will be fully ten times worse by expert estimates, using fairly generous assumptions, such as medical capacity not being overwhelmed causing fatality rate to be substantially higher at peak.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 03-19-2020 at 10:00 AM. Reason: double checking data
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden...-estimates.htm
22-55k. Range due to not being able to fully capture impact.
You always start up with the name calling when you're mad, RG.
Never stopped you...![]()
Your real world expertise doesn't mean when you can't remember what you were claiming. You touted Snopes as if it was the final say that the Trump administration axed the executive branch team responsible for coordinating a response to a pandemic and did not replace it. The group wasn't disbanded, and the same team, minus a few people, does the same work under a different name.
still thinking the US doesn't have a team to respond to a pandemic
"I'm a real world expert"
Another baseless accusation.
But he surfs the interwebs all day and night looking for confirmation bias articles so he has to be an authority on it!
Eyup. mea culpa.
Serious question:
If someone does something dangerous that imperils others, SHOULD other people get angry at that person?
“As part of my volunteer work, I have studied disaster management.”
![]()
I have. Taken about 12 hours of training. It was a fascinating case study in organizational systems for someone with my professional background. We learned a lot when we flubbed Katrina.
Still thinking you are winning. Knock yourself out, boy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)