BOOOOM!!!!
idiots never ing learn
Barr will ultimately be investigated along with trump
book it.
Barr not acting TOO ing guilty of the he has done -
not trying TOO ing hard to cover up that he knows will catch up to him.
Major Report Omission Shows Mueller Was Either Incompetent Or A Political Hack
Not once does Robert Mueller mention an investigation into whether Russia interfered with the presidential election by feeding dossier author Christopher Steele misinformation.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/06...olitical-hack/
Booom!!!!!!
![]()
You guys are seriously still following John Solomon?
Might as well give us some QAnon updates as well.![]()
Who do you follow - Jim Acosta and Kyle Griffin?![]()
Nope.
Not Jhn S
l
m
n
The problem I have with this tweet is that both John Solomon and Sean Hannity make a living peddling fake news for re s.
Hopefully they weren't lying this one time.
I don’t follow Hannity so I’ll have to take your word.
Go through each Solomon article and read the editors notes.
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/48...mns-on-ukraine
"From the opening of the investigation, the FBI team kept ac ulating exculpatory information. Yet rather than wind the investigation down, they ramped it up...Then it got worse. The FBI team excluded exculpatory information from its FISA application..."
of course
a professional investigator will just DROP an investigation because not ALL the evidence points ONE way
lolololol
you gather EVERYTHING
then FOLLOW the evidence - follow the facts - it will lead you to truth.
It did.
Mueller spelled it out already and Barr and Trump COVERED IT UP.
There is your evidence - right there.
If this evidence against a deep state was so prevalent- then the criminal barr and the traitor trump
would release EVERYTHING.
instead....Comrade TSA - is being cherry-picked favorable tidbits and he is swallowing whole again.
useful idiot
How do you validate it without investigating it?
You mean his opinion column?
“Obama admin”
“spied”
you after horowitz report: “it was never claimed to be spying for political gain”
now its a watergate sized scandal?
This again? The context Horowitz put spying for political gain in meant spying to get Trump campaign information (battleground state tactics/ad placements/debate tactics) And again, it was never claimed to be spying for political gain.
Throughout his report Horowitz brings up confidential human sources sent at the Trump campaign and undercover FBI agents sent at the Trump campaign. Illegal FISA warrants were used for the most intrusive form of spying on Carter Page. Yes, the FBI “spied”, it’s not up for debate.
Watergate implies political purposes
CI’s are not typically considered spies but i know we can get into semantics. Espionage by definition seeks political or military information
Yeah, show me all the editors notes pointing out all the fake news he pushes. Or don’t, it wasn’t your claim to begin with.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)