Reply With Quote
Doesn't matter. You have no way of knowing that wasn't a development after the fact.
Also, what are the chances of a pneumonia patient, whose immune system is shot, developing COVID-19 in that petri dish of a hospital?
Third test proved the doctors' diagnosis it was COVID-19 pneumonia.
Doesn't matter. You have no way of knowing that wasn't a development after the fact.
Also, what are the chances of a pneumonia patient, whose immune system is shot, developing COVID-19 in that petri dish of a hospital?
Sure it does. It's what happened.
It's your claim he got it there, so you're going to have to provide that number.Also, what are the chances of a pneumonia patient, whose immune system is shot, developing COVID-19 in that petri dish of a hospital?
You do know that the onset of COVID-19 wasn't after the admission to the hospital?
It's your claim that he arrived with COVID-19 even though there were two negative tests.
Yes, because the doctors had reached that conclusion and it was verified by the third test.
What was your diagnosis when you examined the patient?
Conclusion - the last part of something : such as result:outcome : a final summation
Words have meaning, Chump. You don't go to the hospital and get conclusions before testing. It's simply not how it works.
They diagnosed him with COVID-19 pneumonia on arrival. They were so sure they retested twice when the test said otherwise. That's how it worked.
This in part is why you've been diagnosed as a psychopath. You know that you're lying and you just don't care; you're just going to compulsively lie out right.
Nope. This is exactly what happened. They thought he had COVID-19 and knew the test could produce false negatives. Otherwise they would've stopped at one test.This in part is why you've been diagnosed as a psychopath. You know that you're lying and you just don't care; you're just going to compulsively lie out right.
What part do you not understand?
If they knew it, they wouldn't bother to test three times. It's what you don't "understand," obviously.
They thought he had COVID-19 and knew the test could produce false negatives.
Do you understand?
Thinking is not diagnosing.
movinggoalposts.gif
COVID-19 pneumonia was their diagnosis. The test confirmed it.
Pneumonia was the diagnosis. In fact, they state that point blank.
The diagnosis was COVID-19 pneumonia. That's why they tested for it three times.
Pneumonia was the diagnosis. They state that point blank.
He then either contracted COVID-19, or he was misdiagnosed.
Last edited by Spurtacular; 04-19-2020 at 09:35 PM.
They were right that it was pneumonia. COVID-19 can cause pneummonia.
It can do a lot of things. That doesn't make it the diagnosis.
The initial diagnosis was pneumonia.
I'll call it a lie, bleke. It's all you do here
Then why test three times?
Which COVID-19 can cause.The initial diagnosis was pneumonia.
You call what a lie? You're just giving auto-cuckbacks.
One very possible reason is that a person with pneumonia in a hospital full of COVID can easily contract the virus.
As his condition worsened, that would obviously become even more pertinent.
Yeah, you said that before.
You're going to half to quantify "easily."
What are the chances?
latin america, africa, pacific. poor countries asking for foreign aid/humanitarian aid...why arent they asking their chinese overlords/masters?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions